Sorry X-Mid! I'm Keeping My Duplex

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
  • The X-Mid Pro was one of the most anticipated new tents of the year. Until now the Zpacks Duplex has been the King of ultralight tents. And everyone thinks the X-Mid Pro is going to beat the socks off the Duplex. But is it?
    X-Mid Pro 2: geni.us/7y5l
    Zpacks Duplex: geni.us/OOhn
    Disclaimer: Some of these links are affiliate links where I'll earn a small commission if you make a purchase at no additional cost to you.
    Check out my #TakeASeat Shirts at MyLifeOutdoors...
    Contact me at: info@mylifeoutdoors.com
    Subscribe to my Channel:
    / @mylifeoutdoors
    Subscribe to my Blog:
    mylifeoutdoors....
    Connect on Social:
    Facebook: / mylifeoutdoors
    Twitter: / mylifeoutdoors
    Instagram: / mylifeoutdoors
    Camera Equipment I use: Camera Equipment I use:
    Camera: www.amazon.com...
    Camera Lens: www.amazon.com...
    Audio Mic: www.amazon.com...
    Tripod: href="www.amazon.com...
    ND Filter: www.amazon.com...
    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases at no addition cost to you.

Комментарии • 544

  • @MyLifeOutdoors
    @MyLifeOutdoors  9 месяцев назад

    X-Mid Pro 2: geni.us/lchuziJ
    Zpacks Duplex: geni.us/Agxnca

    • @Wrath0365
      @Wrath0365 9 месяцев назад

      I think the X-Mid is just a better tent. The normal or standard version even crushes most budget tents dollar for dollar.

  • @brycewalburn3926
    @brycewalburn3926 Год назад +274

    I don't think most people prioritize headroom as much as you do. That's not in any way a judgement, just an observation. In my mind, the amount of time that both people are in the tent and sitting up is minimal. So, I would personally prioritize ease of setup, ease of entry/exit, storm worthiness, and condensation management.

    • @1519Spring
      @1519Spring Год назад +21

      Great points, Bryce. It feels like most of the review and the video's conclusion/title are intentionally mismatched to drive viewer engagement and comments like these.

    • @brycewalburn3926
      @brycewalburn3926 Год назад +19

      @@1519Spring I disagree. I'm confident that Steven genuinely believes what he's saying. Certainly, the title and thumbnail are "RUclips-y", but you gotta play the algorithm game these days if you want anyone to see your content. He always talks about headroom when reviewing tents. It's a priority for him, and that's totally fine. Something that I discounted in my original comment is that he is considerably taller than me, so it makes sense that livable space for him (and his wife) is a big deal.

    • @KyleGraham19
      @KyleGraham19 Год назад +2

      @@brycewalburn3926 Additionally, all his friends that he camps with are taller than him, so it’s even more of an issue during those trips with friends.

    • @keithkreatives
      @keithkreatives Год назад +5

      "both of these tents provide more than enough headroom" - Steve. Enough said

    • @deKampeerwijzer
      @deKampeerwijzer Год назад +10

      Right. Only when you undress, go to sleep, wake up and get dressed. So headroom is ONLY a problem when you are inside of the tent. And using it. But the headroom is okay when you are outside of the tent while backpacking or bikepacking. So indeed, headroom is not a valid point for tentpicking.

  • @joelpaul7001
    @joelpaul7001 Год назад +187

    I choose the X Mid all day. That headroom doesn’t make up for all the other ways that the X mid is way better. The door. The vents. The setup. The bonded seams. Feels great inside even with two people. I absolutely love the X mid pro 2.

    • @neilquinn
      @neilquinn Год назад +12

      The setup alone for me. See my other comment - almost every duplex i've seen in the field has a ridiculously horrible pitch.

    • @closer2003
      @closer2003 Год назад +10

      I own both and XMid is the best of them both. Hands down !! Period!!!! ❤

    • @nathandolenc554
      @nathandolenc554 Год назад +1

      Quick question: Are you concerned about the durability of the flooring material in the X Mid Pro?

    • @closer2003
      @closer2003 Год назад +6

      @@nathandolenc554 not at all because it’s a SilPoly not dynema which is use on the regular XMid which I also own and it completely held up without a ground sheet on the Appalachian Trail

    • @Mike___Kilo
      @Mike___Kilo Год назад

      Agreed. And I haven’t noticed any issue with the headroom.

  • @durstongear
    @durstongear Год назад +541

    Thanks for the review and kind words. As you say, the X-Mid Pro 2 has a lot of advantages (e.g. no poles in doorways, door zippers, at least as good useable length, bonded construction etc) plus many others like a full coverage fly to block drafts, peak vents, and more floor area.
    For headroom, I was surprised that you found the Duplex more spacious because the X-Mid Pro is simply the tent with more headroom. That is a main advantage of the X-Mid geometry and this improvement in headroom has been widely praised by many other review outlets (e.g. BackpackingLight, Section Hiker, Outdoor Gear Lab). More specifically, the X-Mid Pro 2 has 20% more volume in the upper half compared to the Duplex including a longer ridgeline (58" vs 48").
    The headroom only appears less here because you are measuring both tents with a methodology that is optimized for the Duplex (e.g. you measure both tents at the location where the Duplex has it's maximum room, instead of measuring the X-Mid where it's headroom is). The X-Mid ultimately has more headroom because both tents have a similar ridgeline height, but the X-Mid ridgeline is 10" longer (58" vs 48") so that is a 10" longer span of headroom - not 25" less. The X-Mid ridgeline runs on an angle, so to capture this headroom you have to measure at that angle. This headroom is very much real, since two people can sit at this same angle an enjoy the full 58" length of the ridgeline (vs 48") that lets you sit 10" further apart than the Duplex. Perhaps you prefer the PLACEMENT of the headroom in the Duplex but I suggest this is because you are used to that tent. It is a small extra step to shift slightly offset for max headroom in the X-Mid but this quickly becomes second nature and gives substantially more headroom as the two occupants move 10" further apart for substantially better personal space like this:
    imgur.com/CmhjSLT.png

    • @nelistheron83
      @nelistheron83 Год назад +36

      X-mid Aaaalll the way!!!

    • @grasshopper33xx
      @grasshopper33xx Год назад +9

      Does the regular X-Mid 2 fit 2 25" pads? I thought I read somewhere (maybe drop??) that the floor is actually 52" wide

    • @daveenrando1820
      @daveenrando1820 Год назад +12

      @@grasshopper33xx yes it does

    • @grasshopper33xx
      @grasshopper33xx Год назад +8

      @@daveenrando1820 Awesome thanks! I think I've found my next tent

    • @amythinks
      @amythinks Год назад +43

      I thought the click-baity headline was unfair to X-Mid given the content of the review.

  • @diversie509
    @diversie509 Год назад +112

    You can also get the X-Mid in a non-dyneema fabric and its less than $300 for a sub 2.5 lb tent. Also the X-Mid stands up to wind and intense storms WAYYYY better with premium waterproof zippers and massive vestibules. honestly an odd choice I feel to choose the Duplex for stuff like freestanding ability if you shell out another few hundred dollars.

    • @Mike___Kilo
      @Mike___Kilo Год назад +2

      Agreed. I did something radical and asked my sons what they thought was best. They voted for the X-Mid 2P Gen 2 Solid over the Pro. They thought it would be nice to have for fall-winter while using our "legacy" Gen 1 2P for spring-summer.

    • @poptart14971
      @poptart14971 Год назад +1

      Yeah when he said the price for the X mid it caught me off guard for a second!

    • @Y2J3469
      @Y2J3469 Год назад +2

      The X-Mid is not even slightly better, let along “WAYYYY” better in windy conditions and storms.
      Both tents are good; however, this dude manifestly hasn’t used both tents in windy conditions and we have a fake new alert bulletin!

    • @Chris66able
      @Chris66able Год назад

      @@Y2J3469 I was looking to buy the xmid, until l saw a couple of videos, and written reviews saying its total garbage in rough weather, the sides blew in concave. There's a site selling glue on patches to attach extra guy lines.

    • @ColtPinky
      @ColtPinky Год назад +3

      @@Chris66able those reviews were most likely written by people who didnt set up the tent right i own and xmid 2 and it held up in 4 and a half inches of snow without me needing to smack it off cause it doesnt build up on the walls if set up tight. i have no idea about needing guy lines cause i havent brought it into heavy winds without tree cover but it has several point to anchor so i doubt it would be a problem

  • @peter123123st
    @peter123123st Год назад +84

    The biggest difference, which you don't address, is dealing with wind. I own both tents. When it is windy the wind (and rain ) blow under the vestibule doors of the Duplex no matter how low you pitch it. The XMid Pro can pitch down to the ground around the entire perimeter solving that design issue. I like both tents but prefer the XMid when the forecast is for nasty weather.

    • @christianb8228
      @christianb8228 Год назад +1

      True, but other wise it’s a good video I think

    • @whereisthemessiah
      @whereisthemessiah Год назад

      Interesting, thanks for sharing!

    • @ExMeroMotu9
      @ExMeroMotu9 Год назад +1

      @@christianb8228 No one is asking if the video was good though?

  • @UGA.D
    @UGA.D Год назад +32

    However... I find that when two people are in the tent for an extended time and are not sleeping, they face each other. If my wife and I are rained in and talking, eating or playing a game, we aren't shoulder to shoulder, side by side facing the same way. In those instances the X-Mid is fantastic as the peaks offset and both people have equal (tall!) headroom.

    • @normpeterson7767
      @normpeterson7767 Год назад +1

      Absolutely this, 100%. I just got my X-mid and got to use if for the first time this past weekend. Wife and I went backpacking together. We tried sleeping the same direction the first night. Quickly figured out it's better to sleep opposite. Did not experience any more foot stink than any other arrangement (let's be honest, there's a lot of stink to go around when you're out on the trail) and the benefits exceed any perceived disadvantage. Like you, I think it's actually an advantage.

  • @karyn4875
    @karyn4875 Год назад +101

    The door falls to the ground
    The trekking pole and the guy line get in the way of the door
    Hook and loop system on door is difficult to use and doesn't stay closed very well.
    You need 8 stakes and guy lines. X-mid you need 4.
    The only positive thing you said about the duplex was the perceived head room and it's availability. Those two things do not, in my opinion, outweigh the positives you said about the x-mid.

    • @keithkreatives
      @keithkreatives Год назад +6

      Yeah. I used follow this guy for good advice but ........ 🤷‍♂️

    • @paulkeeley1905
      @paulkeeley1905 Год назад +3

      The X-mid is a hot item at the moment and everyone is raving about it. An opinion against everyone else is so far out there that it guarantees views and more so comments so increases RUclips revenue. The Xmid is the better tent, availability is sorted pending the next deliveries from November - February and the headroom issue isn't a problem as you're supposed to lie down opposite each other in the 2p Xmids.

    • @kevin7mckinney
      @kevin7mckinney Год назад +5

      @@paulkeeley1905 there is size differences between the regular and pro 2P in floor space. The pro will do better with mummy style pads that aren’t wide - which gram counting ultralight users likely already use. I think the two versions are very dialed in for their intended user base. Pro has 48x90, reg has 52x92. Reg is double-wall, pro is single-wall. A reg xmid would absolutely accommodate 2P waaaaaay better than this reviewer is claiming - staggering sleeping pads slightly (still head to head) with its generous length would work. I agree with you - the video strikes me as click-bait - sure, everyone has their own deal breakers, but I think he’s just being controversial to kick up dust/clicks/comments. And it worked - here I am replying to you lol.
      But, it I also unsubscribed from this channel, too 🤷🏻‍♂️ - I think his conclusion is irrational - and that’s not what I’m looking for in a reviewer.

  • @KrizAkoni
    @KrizAkoni Год назад +37

    Very nice video! I’ve had the Duplex for 5 years and become very familiar with it as a one and two person tent. Using stick struts on the sidewall lines, one can achieve a little more headroom. It’s flexible and forgiving when it comes to pitch too. The rainbow door with centered pole was awkward but I got used to it. Pockets and clothesline loops were a nice touch. Now I also have the XMid Pro 2. More room for two…massive for one. The headroom seemed bigger for me and my wife and we had more room for stuff inside. Better one hand zip doors and less stakes to pitch. Glued seams. And a ton of optional tie outs and anchor loops for all kinds of flexible pitching. Our Pro was also lighter than the Duplex by a little bit and packs smaller. I wanted to like the Duplex better…it’s my “1st love” and don’t want to betray it…and yet here I am, liking the XMid better.

    • @mikeyhikeys
      @mikeyhikeys Год назад +1

      I agree that using sticks to prop up the side walls of the duplex makes a nice difference when it comes to headroom...love the duplex, especially for leaving the doors open at night and having great sunrise views. The XMid also looks great!

  • @BeedeeEx
    @BeedeeEx Год назад +33

    The ease of setup, weather protected vestibules, actual zippers, even the bath tub floor that holds its shape all make the X-Mid the tent for me. But I also tried a 25” wide pad and honestly didn’t see why everyone loves them so much more that a standard 20”. But I guess I’m weird like that. Excellent video as always! Thank you.

    • @jimihenrik11
      @jimihenrik11 Год назад +4

      Calling 50 cm (20") the standard is quite a stretch. In my opinion it was only the standard for thin foam pads. Because on a thin 50 cm foam pad your arms will rest on the ground, which will probably not be noticed. On a thick inflatable pad with only 50 cm width your arms will fall of the sides and due to the thickness result in a very uncomfortable sleeping position. Therefore, I think wider pads in the 60 - 65 cm range should be the standard for inflatable pads.

    • @BeedeeEx
      @BeedeeEx Год назад +2

      @@jimihenrik11 I’m just using industry terms (at least in the USA). 20” is regular or standard, and 25” is wide…also know as not standard. That’s all. I’ve used a 25” pad for about 15 nights on various trips and I never found it a whole lot better than a 20”. I know that’s not typical, just my personal experience is all.

    • @mysterylovescompany2657
      @mysterylovescompany2657 Год назад +1

      @@BeedeeEx I guess it wouldn't be that terrible if you don't have wide shoulders or hips, & you're not a particularly mobile sleeper.

    • @BeedeeEx
      @BeedeeEx Год назад

      @@mysterylovescompany2657 I'm not a tiny guy, but I guess I don't move much at night. I know that I am the minority though.

    • @Kevinschart
      @Kevinschart Год назад +2

      I'm 6'1". I have decently broad shoulders and a 76 inch wing span. I sleep on my back and every time my elbow slips off the pad, and touches the cold ground, it wakes me up. For me, a 25" pad is a necessity for good sleep. Everyone does not have the same body that you have.

  • @mochidomo
    @mochidomo Год назад +10

    The fact that you compromise on every single advantage the x-mid has over the duplex just for a little more "conventional headroom" really says something...

    • @glassman3333
      @glassman3333 Год назад +1

      It says … that’s what’s important to him.

  • @jasonburke3620
    @jasonburke3620 Год назад +22

    I would choose the X-mid all day and everyday over the duplex for the exact reasons you mentioned in your video. And the supply issues will be a thing of the past starting in February.

    • @dianawright9624
      @dianawright9624 Год назад

      But if you wanted to backpack with the X-mid this Summer/Fall, you couldn’t purchase it. I understand supply issues, but it was frustrating that it was unavailable after the many stellar reviews. Husband hiking the Long Trail ended up buying the duplex for his October hike. It will be interesting to see if supply issues are resolved…

    • @wilderoutdoors
      @wilderoutdoors Год назад +1

      @@dianawright9624 easy to buy on eBay.

  • @jackvoss5841
    @jackvoss5841 Год назад +18

    The REAL lesson here, is that we have some choices. We didn’t used to have the many choices that we have now. Any one of nearly any other of the tents out there are pretty darned nice. When we have to use small comparison points between Exhibit A and Exhibit B, we are in a privileged group.
    Just my thoughts. But, they’re pretty much true.
    Courtesy of Half Vast Flying

  • @ciscokid1999
    @ciscokid1999 Год назад +23

    Wow, the fact that Zpacks doors are one of the worst designs in tents today. To think you need to skirt your way around a tent door when entering and exiting is crazy. You have no choice but to have this in mind or you will gouge a hole in the mesh door and even get it dirty if it hits a soggy ground...Also Zpacks tend to get splash back in heavy rain inside the mesh vents that protects against condensation. The Xmid can literally pitch to the ground to prevent this from happening. Glad you mentioned the pole in the middle of the Zpack tents, this i might be able to live with, but Dan and his team has addressed all the points I mention. I would call the Xmid a Zpacks killer. I appreciate the video keep em coming. So after hearing your comments as I was typing away, you hit all my points why the Zpack is not better........lol. Oh, Head room is important, but the simplicity of setting up, less stakes is worth getting the Xmid.

    • @willek1335
      @willek1335 Год назад

      I guess the question is, do you sleep with a partner or solo?

  • @ytmwang
    @ytmwang Год назад +13

    I use the xmid pro for solo backpacking, and after 15-20 miles in a day I don't usually do much sitting up in the tent, if at all. As such, I find the xmid's benefits (faster pitch, less stakes, zipper, out of the way poles) far outweigh any perceived negatives the xmid may have. It really bugs me to have to crawl around the trekking poles and unzip the door all the way in the middle of the night just to go pee! I really dislike the awkward clip system for the tent fly as well. Thanks for the video!

  • @danloucks1251
    @danloucks1251 Год назад +24

    The regular Xmid is double walled and is 50 inches of floor space side to side.
    Steven you should do a comparison of the regular Xmid and the new outdoor vitals forties tent.

    • @lakorai2
      @lakorai2 Год назад +3

      The new V2 model is 52" wide

  • @nelistheron83
    @nelistheron83 Год назад +15

    Chose the X-mid. As a 6'3 guy, getting in and out of the tent without having to contort around an obstacle right in the middle of my way, while being concerned whether I'm damaging or wetting my door is a clear win!

    • @ericlane2954
      @ericlane2954 Год назад

      @Straight & Narrow I'm also 6'3". How's the headroom for you when you lie down? Length and headroom for those of us that are taller is rarely mentioned. Thanks for your thoughts.

    • @edwardcorrado2541
      @edwardcorrado2541 Год назад +2

      @@ericlane2954 I have the Xmid 2 Pro and I'm 6'2". I fell like I could be at least another 6 inches taller and still would have plenty of room length wise and I had no problem with the height.

    • @nelistheron83
      @nelistheron83 Год назад +1

      @@ericlane2954 Hi. Take a look at the Side Trail Adventure channel. Search his X-mid 2 John Muir Trail video. Skip to chapter- "Take a look inside" it's about 8:45 min into the video.

    • @nelistheron83
      @nelistheron83 Год назад +1

      Also see video by Brian Albus X-mid 2p for tall sleepers. He is 6'4

    • @ericlane2954
      @ericlane2954 Год назад

      @@nelistheron83 Thanks for these resources. I'll check them out!

  • @tomhoppe5757
    @tomhoppe5757 Год назад +9

    X-Mid. Flat out, easy decision for me. Zippered doors, more stable, not tripping on the poles or guy lines, easy 4 stake setup.

  • @anthonyng8800
    @anthonyng8800 Год назад +4

    Love your channel but you messed up here... watch the video again, based on your head to head, pretty sure the x-mid came out ahead

  • @01huntingtown
    @01huntingtown Год назад +60

    This kinda feels like a click bait video. The X-mid is so clearly superior in practically every way. Very odd conclusion.

    • @MrsStevenBrown
      @MrsStevenBrown 8 месяцев назад +9

      Completely! Like who wants a pole in their way! Who wants hooks holding the vestibule closed instead of a waterproof zipper! I’m going for the regular XMid 2, still under 2 pounds and 280$. ❤

  • @CharmingGecko
    @CharmingGecko Год назад +7

    I can’t believe someone would prefer the Duplex’s garbage doors over the. X-Mid.

  • @davidgeorge442
    @davidgeorge442 Год назад +11

    Interesting. I have both tents and I love the X-Mid specifically because I don’t hit my head in it like I do with the Duplex. As a 6’1” solo user, I feel that my x-Mid has so much more functional headroom than my Duplex.

  • @mgillee1
    @mgillee1 Год назад +2

    I gotta say this is likely a groupie kind of choice for some. To me, XMid2 has the bells and whistles I care about. Clip closures in sideways wind???? That turns your tent's bathtub into a real bathtub... from a place with real rain, XMid ALL the way... just ordered my 2nd. Why? I didn't need it, but I just could not help myself. I had to see the gen2 with side walls, more interior space, and an even steeper pitch for shedding the weather.

  • @brandonb.5304
    @brandonb.5304 11 месяцев назад +1

    I'll choose the tent that doesn't have the trekking pole directly in the middle of its doorway, the pole that's the only thing holding the tent upright. When you're getting up in the middle of the night to pee, I can foresee plenty of people knocking the trekking pole down trying to get out in the dark, collapsing the entire tent. Seems like a pretty big flaw to me.

  • @Tanko3691
    @Tanko3691 Год назад +2

    Unfortunately, neither of them are designed for the UK, but if I had to, it would be the X-Mid, the Duplex looks like something the kids would play in at the bottom of the garden, that toggle for the doors is a joke.

  • @helpfulcommenter
    @helpfulcommenter Год назад +2

    Solo hiker here. Love my X-Mid. It just feels more stable in weather and every little detail is perfect.
    Oh. It’s not a “Pro” but it still rules. It actually has FOUR pockets and they’re actually above ground.

  • @2910Alison
    @2910Alison 10 месяцев назад +1

    With the Duplex, the door possibly not closing so it might rain on you, and not having the air vents to keep it raining from you on the inside are enough to make the X-Mid the obvious choice. As you even say if you stagger the pads then when your lying down it doesn't matter. And how often are two people sitting up? I'm personally up and running away way before my boyfriend so it never be a problem.

  • @daveonahike5561
    @daveonahike5561 Год назад +6

    I feel that I can do an educated comparison of the Durston X-Mid design vs the Zpacks Duplex as I have both. I own both of the original Durston SilPoly X-Mids, the 1P and the 2 P. I also own the Zpacks DupleXL, which I took when I did the AT this year. I chose the DupleXL for the AT strictly due to the weight benefit vs the X-Mid 2P. (The 1P was a bit coffin like for a long through hike). After returning from the AT I did a couple of nights out with the X-Mid and I have to say that the experience only pointed out how terrible the doors and vestibules are on the Zpacks in comparison. I enjoyed being able to open the screen and fly zippers with only one hand with the X-Mid, along with not dealing with the door dropping into the mud or on the floor of the tent like with the DupleXL. The fully zippered fly of the X-Mid was also much more wind/rain resistant than the poor door design of the DupleXL. Zpacks tries to walk the fine line between ultralight and stupid light, and the doors are an example of where they’ve strayed across into stupid light. If the X-Mid 2 Pro had been available when I was making my final tent decision for my AT through hike, I would have happily gone with it.
    Edit - I didn’t use the pockets in the DupleXL after the novelty of the first couple of nights as their location only made sure that anything in them was in the way of entering or exiting the tent, or got rained on due to the lousy doors. Didn’t use them, didn’t see any advantage to them.

    • @Algorythmfpv
      @Algorythmfpv Год назад

      I was going to get the original SilPoly x-mid 2. For not only future possibility of camping with a partner, but the added floor space and head space inside the tent. My biggest worry as a side sleeper is that I would kick my leg off the side of my pad and push the mesh of the 1P tent into the dirt and get my quilt or knee (plus the bug netting) dirty or wet, however I'm starting to learn toward the 1P for weight, smaller footprint meaning more possible locations to pitch it, and price difference. My question to you is, do you use a 25" wide pad? have you ever experienced the SilPoly-1P being too narrow in the netting and or running into the netting while tossing and turning in your sleep?
      Thanks in advance!

    • @daveonahike5561
      @daveonahike5561 Год назад

      @@Algorythmfpv I use a 25” rectangular Nemo Tensor, the long wide version, without any trouble in my 1P. I haven’t run into any problems with pushing the inner tent into the dirt or mud at all, and actually with the amount of room between the inner tent, and the fly there is little risk of bumping against the fly. As far as tossing and turning, I sleep like a rotisserie chicken, turning all night long and had no problems. I did suspect that using the 1P on a 5-6 month through hike might feel a bit tight, but with the design changes with the current version, I think that would be less of an issue. I’ve used mine on multi-day backing trips and was quite comfortable. This weekend I’m going to give my 2P Pro a try.

  • @johnmiddleton4753
    @johnmiddleton4753 Год назад +4

    Having used both, I much prefer the xmid. I have the solid inner. Much better tent for how I use it. Great review though, thanks

  • @pepstein
    @pepstein Год назад +3

    For me it's not even close. My last tent had the trekking poles in the middle of the door. So annoying when getting in or out! X-Mid solves that problem perfectly. The mesh door hangs down without touching the ground, and the trekking poles provide a place to lean your pack and hang a towel, without getting in the way. It's easy to reach the zipper on the fly too.
    With a few nights under our belt, I can confirm the X-Mid Pro 2 has plenty of room for two people to sit up at the same time, whether facing in the same or opposite directions. It handles rain well when pitched low to the ground. Ventilation is decent and it's easy to reach everywhere to wipe off condensation. My only challenge so far is getting the 4 corners square for a perfect pitch, but I have a few ideas.

  • @JOHNW2999
    @JOHNW2999 Год назад +3

    I HAD a duplex, used it for the entire PCT. However, last month I had the safety pins one of the doors shut because the cheap low quality zipper had failed. ( Like you mentioned it lays on the ground and the dirt and sand). Before I finish my journey both zippers failed . Their customer service isn't what I'd expect. Sure they mailed me replacement zippers and told me how to fix it under warranty. Ultimately ended up causing more damage to the tent trying to fix it because I'm not a seamstress, so I sold it, & haven't been happier.

  • @tomhayes7134
    @tomhayes7134 Год назад +3

    Been rocking the X-mid 1 since it’s Drop days and have never regretted it. Best $200 I’ve ever spent on a tent. Eventually will move to the Pro, but not yet.

  • @danagantt2474
    @danagantt2474 Год назад +6

    The X Mid 2 Pro got my purchase due to ease of setup, weight, door design, bonded seams, vents and zippers. The X Mids are the best tent(s) that I have used. I have a 1P, 2P and 2P Pro. They just make sense. If you need pockets, you can buy them from Zpacks! I don't quite get the whole headroom issue but then I use the tent mostly solo and it is a friggin' palace. Seems to me the reason they are hard to get while production ramps up is that the design does a great job of addressing most backpackers use cases, regardless of if you are an ultralight thru hiker or a weekend warrior, there is an XMid version for you and/or your budget.

  • @keving574
    @keving574 Год назад +1

    I thought this was a fantastic review. I've owned a duplex for about 5 years and really like it. I thought your points regarding the trekking pole obstructing access, the awkward toggle to close the vestibule area, and the outward pull on the vestibule tensioner string were totally valid. That said, I have not had any issue with the rainbow shaped doors. The Durston Xmid 2 Pro looks like it is extremely well thought out. I like the 4 stake pitch, the zipper vestibule, the offset pole not impeding access, the hanging doors and the larger vestibule storage space. Very, very well done. My biggest issue with the Durston's design is the amount of space required to pitch it. Reminds me of the days when i used a Trailstar and was never able to find adequate space to pitch my shelter when hiking with friends. Overall, the differences are minor based on my use of the duplex. I'm also a gram weanie so i hate to say it but 2 or 2.5 oz of weight difference also makes a difference. That's just me, however. Net-net, my guess is people will love either of these tents and i love to see someone giving zpacks a run for the money.

  • @elevatelife-nk7896
    @elevatelife-nk7896 Год назад +2

    I totally agree with your assessment about the duplex over the x-mid. I initially bought the duplex and loved it for myself only (and personally felt like it was large enough for my husband and I), but realized that we had significant humidity build up on the inside for a single walled tent, so I purchased the x-mid 2 (double walled) and after setting it up in the living room (in the winter), I'm so disappointed at the headroom. I feel claustrophobic in it and can't understand why the head room doesn't bother other people. So I've been on a search to find the next best thing to my duplex that is double walled, so that we don't have the condensation issue - which seems to be super significant with the two of us in the tent at the same time - enough to drip down on our heads while we sleep. Maybe we just exhale a lot of moisture, IDK - but if you have any better ideas on the next lightest, roomiest double walled tent for two, let me know! 🙂. Thanks!

  • @PrivateRash
    @PrivateRash Год назад +2

    The regular (non-pro) Xmid fits two 25" pads, better zippers, better seams, better door, just over 2# and has an option to get ultralight poles so you don't "need" to use trekking poles. All for $300!!! Clear winner!

  • @Mars21681
    @Mars21681 Год назад +2

    The x mid has a much better design, full stop. The duplex with the free standing kit is good. X mid has 1 person and 3 person sizes, plus different materials with inner mesh tent and no condensation issues. I'll go with the better design even with slight more weight as I'm not a weeny, but I'll fine with ultralight. My goal isn't to compromise by going as light as possible. My goal is to have my kit highly tuned while being light or "ultra light" without compromise.

  • @rolfdenver
    @rolfdenver Год назад +2

    I've seen the Duplex on the trail and would love to own one, but having bought the X-Mid Pro 2 I'm super happy with it. For me, the ease and speed of 4-stake pitching are paramount. I don't think there's any other tent out there where you can lay the tent down in a driving rainstorm, pitch four stakes, insert two trekking poles through vents, and finish setting up the tent with the interior and bottom of the tent being totally dry. Also, the incredible ventilation of the X-Mid is an added plus.

  • @artallen2860
    @artallen2860 Год назад +3

    I have two Zpack solo tents and getting in and particularly out of them (center pole, two hand zipper open wide, fiddling with outer door hooks) a couple times a night is a royal pain. All these issues are none existent in my Xmid pro. So Xmid pro for me and my wife.

  • @LMay64
    @LMay64 Год назад +2

    I've had a duplex for 3 years now. I love the flex pole kit and often opt to bring it when I believe bad weather and rain are highly likely. Now, with ZPacks offering an XL version for very little weight difference, the duplex XL is a wonderful choice. I appreciate the xmid pro uses fewer stakes, but this is only when the flex pole kit is not used. I do believe I'd like a zipper and better door system, but not enough to switch from the duplex at this time. All of that said, I have an XMid 1P Solid on order as a winter tent. I'm looking forward to using the double walled Durston tent above treeline when conditions are grim and possible very large hail is expected that would damage dcf. Also, there is the option of using the fly or inner by themselves for a bit of weight savings. Both tents, in and of themselves, are nice options, but I'm not going to rush out to purchase one as a replacement for the other. There are too many other unique designs and options to look for a tent that is more distinguished. My Duplex serves me well and will go with me on many more adventures. Now if Dan were to come up with a really nice one pole trekking tent that outperforms the Altaplex and Plex Solo, I'd give it a look. I REALLY don't like my Altaplex.

  • @ewoksalot
    @ewoksalot Год назад +8

    I'm an X-mid 1 guy. Love it. Two person test are for socialites :P

    • @robyncaddell5269
      @robyncaddell5269 Год назад

      Lol I love this comment. I’m waiting for my x-mid 1 to arrive

    • @ewoksalot
      @ewoksalot Год назад

      @@robyncaddell5269 It's my first tent. I've always cowboy camped... and I love it so far. I want to get it out once or twice more and then I'll shoot a quick review.
      I'm excited for you!

  • @Kevinschart
    @Kevinschart Год назад +5

    The xmid is more storm worthy. Period. The huge vestibule gaps on the duplex leads to rain splatter, lack of privacy, and decreased wind shedding. Sleeping head to toe is no big deal if necessary. Duplex owners constantly complain about toe box wetness because of the wall slope. The more vertical walls on the xmid help it perform better. Objectively these two are a wash. Campers that are concerned about a freestanding tent after spending $700, usually will have a great freestanding tent for the job. There are plenty of areas where the xmid outperforms, but it seems like you focused on your personal checklist which is fine.

  • @matthewho826
    @matthewho826 Год назад +2

    I always size up my tent when backpacking or canod tripping. I always take a 2P tent when going solo and 3P tent when going tandem. So, headroom isn't the issue for me. The idea is to have space for my gears - things I don't want to get wet. To this end, I will still prefer the X-Mid over Duplex... both are great tents in term of quality but the pole and guideline at the middle of the doorway of duplex is my primary reason to go with the X-Mid.

  • @rushi7312
    @rushi7312 Год назад +2

    Bought a non dcf x-mid as my first trekking pole tent. Received it today and super excited to try it out.

    • @Algorythmfpv
      @Algorythmfpv Год назад

      is it a 1P or 2? If the 1P have you had any issues with running into the netting on either side while sleeping or an arm or leg rolling off your pad and pushing the netting to the ground?

  • @Mike___Kilo
    @Mike___Kilo Год назад +3

    The X-Mid is far superior.

  • @jwpercy
    @jwpercy Год назад +1

    If I am buying a tent with the intended purpose of sleeping two people, I wouldn't buy a 2P tent even in the ultra-light category. There just isn't enough room in any of them for my comfort. I would go with a 3P and split the weight with the second person. You will save money and still carry as little as a 1.5 lbs per person for shelter.

  • @lauriemeade8592
    @lauriemeade8592 Год назад +6

    I've owned both the Duplex and Triplex. After 2000+ PCT miles I sold my Duplex, because the Triplex was a better fit after I got a new canine companion.
    I was able to score the X-Mid Pro 2 last month. Honestly, when I first set it up, it felt super narrow. Narrower than what I remembered the Duplex feeling. Then again, I sold that 2 years ago and spent this summer on the Colorado Trail in the Triplex with my pup. The Triplex is a palace.
    I've since taken the X-Mid Pro out twice, on single night trips, with my pup. I use a 25" pad and a 20" inflatable short pad for my pup. It's tight for sure, but is sufficient and feeling a bit larger than when I first set it up without putting in the pads.
    So far I like the X-Mid Pro. I would rather have a 1oz dyneema floor, like the Zpacks tent. Yes, I know the Sil nylon packs down smaller, but the dyneema is bombproof. I've ordered the Durston footprint, because the floor feels rather flimsy compared to Zpacks. This, of course, adds more weight.
    I'm planning on swapping out the guylines with the cord Zpacks uses, because the Durston guyline is a bit rough and sticky sometimes in the lineloc.
    Also, don't waste $10 on the stakes Durston offers. Get something more durable. I have a mix of titanium Shepard hooks and 2 mini groundhogs to anker down the windward side of the tent.
    I don't understand tent manufactures not offering quality stakes, but instead offer stakes that are heavy or bend when you look at them.
    There's so much to like about the Durston design: the setup, doors, vents, steeper walls to shed condensation and the zippers. My biggest concern is the floor material. Time will tell.
    I had planned on selling the Triplex once I received the X-Mid Pro, but think I will hold on to it for a while to see if I miss the extra space for me and my pup.

  • @ruth370
    @ruth370 5 месяцев назад

    Great video, both tents are excellent! I chose the X-mid. I'm super short so the headroom isn't an issue for me, but it is for my husband who is super tall. So in our case it is perfect. For a super rainy night when we are hanging out in the tent I like that we can sit facing each other rather than side by side. But the ease of setup is what actually sold me. I struggle so much, but this one is easy for me and makes ALL the difference. The stakes are garbage though, we use our old stakes.

  • @normpeterson7767
    @normpeterson7767 Год назад +1

    I just bought the Durston X-mid Pro 2P. I think it arrived in Sept and I just took it backpacking this weekend. We were only out 2 nights (hey, fall break is fall break; you only get so many days). First night we slept same direction. Second night we slept opposite and it worked much better. Both had our own vestibule. Both had the advantage of the tall area on our head end of the tent. And we actually slid around less on a more sloped spot than the night before. My big complaint would apply to any single-wall design and that's condensation. But the weight trade-off made it well worth that small sacrifice.

  • @mathieulepage4910
    @mathieulepage4910 14 дней назад

    I bought the "X-Mid 2 Solid" for two reasons other than lightness, quality and all the other advantages you mentioned. So 1st the "Solid" for the double wall feature since I deal with high humidity often and 2nd the 2 person tent since I like to keep my crash pad in my tent when I go camping on climbing trips. I live in New-Bruswick Canada it's quite humid especially in the forest since we have most of our hiking trails in the hills next to the shoreline. I'm absolutely in love with my tent so far and I plan on purchasing one of the backpacks they sell(Kakwa 55). I sadly have to wait for the backpack purchase since the small version is out of stock in Ultra 200 frabric.

  • @MugoiKihaku
    @MugoiKihaku 9 месяцев назад

    when it comes to condensation and gettin up in the morning with two people. head space is honestly so crucial for comfort. a lot of people are bashing that decision but its pretty solid reasoning for comfort.

  • @ListlessSilence
    @ListlessSilence Год назад +4

    I’d still choose the X Mid over the duplex, the ease of setup and storm readiness is simply superior to the duplex. While these are “2 person tents” as someone like me who uses 2p tents as 1p tent I would 100% pick the X Mid.

  • @JoshSweet
    @JoshSweet Год назад +4

    The regular Xmid 2 has 52 inch floors, and it’s only 2.5 lbs….

  • @rabmcleod3508
    @rabmcleod3508 Год назад +1

    For me living and playing in the windy mingfest that is the Scottish Highlands the X-Mid Pro is the clear winner due to the door closure, its just way more secure when its blowing a hoolie with that Scottish horizontal rain. The Duplex is a great tent and I did use it for years but it used to rip my knitting with the doors flapping around like a burst couch. Simple.

  • @bairdotv
    @bairdotv Год назад

    Simple solution. X mid pro 1. Less snoring. Better sleep. The floor of the xmid feels very thin. Wondering if footprint is a must compare to duplex.

  • @simonpratt5475
    @simonpratt5475 Год назад +1

    I got the X-Mid Pro 2. My wife and I sleep on 2 wide pads in it and it seems fine, doesn't put any pressure on the zippers or overly tension the floor that I've noticed. I shared my friend's triplex last week for a 4 day trip and the only thing that I thought was better was that it was 60" wide instead of 48". Those doors on the triplex make me feel like I'm going to break it every time I get out, plus slightly worse headroom. Now if there was a 60" wide X-Mid Pro 3 I'd be all over it. Worth the extra grams!

  • @b0mazor
    @b0mazor 6 месяцев назад +1

    OMG those pockets make a world of difference why did you wait till the end?!?!

  • @EndOfTrail
    @EndOfTrail Год назад +4

    Cannot beat the xmid pro imo. Sets up perfectly in under 2 minutes with 4 stakes. Just spent 2 nights in heavy rain and not a single drop inside. If you don’t get your duplex just right, you’ll have puddles inside.

  • @camerontipton4384
    @camerontipton4384 Год назад +1

    Probably should have mentioned that the x mid offers a cheap option that the duplex doesnt. A 389$ savings I might add. Yeah it's a different material and 16oz heavier but it justifies the cost savings.

  • @brucecarroll4041
    @brucecarroll4041 Год назад +1

    Another great video. Being solo in my tent always, your Vid has convinced that waiting to get an X-Mid Pro is the better long term option. You make good stuff. Super Thanks.

  • @kid5Media
    @kid5Media Год назад +1

    Not having used either, but having read and viewed extensive reviews, I wouldn't hesitate to get in line for an X-Mid. And not the pro. I don't think the weight savings are anywhere near the price/performance tradeoffs.

  • @jimdeehr4283
    @jimdeehr4283 Год назад

    If the tent site is sloped so that 2 people need to sleep head-to-head, sleep that way, but one person flip head-to-foot at other times. It's easy and each person has full advantage of the x-mid design for head and shoulder room.

  • @29028ft
    @29028ft Год назад +2

    And if you're a couple that uses a 2-person pad and quilt, staggering pads is not an option. I upgraded my Duplex to the DupleXL, and the difference is huuuggge.

  • @mooreofstephen
    @mooreofstephen 7 месяцев назад

    The Xmid Pro now has pockets as of 2024. The only thing I can't argue with is the freestanding you get with zpack but Ive yet to need that in all my years of camping but its nice to have it as a backup. All the other issues are for sure not enough to pick the zpack IMO.

  • @mitchholder99
    @mitchholder99 Год назад +2

    Should have added a side by side of setting up each tent and tearing down and putting away with a timer.... X-mid 2mins duplex 5+ mins

  • @Andy-Mesa
    @Andy-Mesa Год назад +2

    No mention of the primary reason why I chose my XMid 1: storm worthiness.
    You went backpacking with Dan Becker and his X-Mid did great in the 40 mph winds. How did your tent do again?

  • @bjf10
    @bjf10 Год назад +2

    I currently use a Lanshan 2 Pro, which I generally like, but it is more space than I need and either of these would be a POUND less weight in my pack, which would be quite welcome. A single person trekking pole tent from either manufacturer would be even better in that regard, but I'm not really sure how small is too small, and the expense makes the idea of trying one out pretty daunting.

  • @Mike-vd2qt
    @Mike-vd2qt 4 месяца назад

    Tarptent Protrail for solo backpacking or bikepacking. Fast and easy setup, takes less space to set up, great in wind and rain. Very well made with excellent construction.

  • @Xhadp
    @Xhadp 4 месяца назад

    After watching a couple of these comparison videos: I'd say the Durston tents are better except with one major caveat, they require more space. I see some people claiming that its only 13% larger but that can be an issue depending on camp-site. We're buying two-person tents for the ability to have a second person's worth of space for a reason. We aren't looking for that extra space for a cathedral at a campsite.
    Durston excels in providing cheaper options and alternatives like double-walled tents whereas Z-packs is only building tents at a price point/options for dedicated thru-hikers.

  • @chrismiller5390
    @chrismiller5390 Год назад +1

    X-mid wins for me. Ease of set-up, storm worthiness, less condensation, better construction, better design massively outweigh any cons for me...but I'm only 5'8 and my wife is 5'3, so we didn't notice any headroom issues.

  • @Dante07cid
    @Dante07cid Год назад +3

    XMid all the way, but the double walls. I own XMid 2 original and XMid 1 v2 solid. Love them both. Got both for price of one Duplex.

  • @TacBlades
    @TacBlades Год назад +1

    For me the durston is just a better design, better features better buying options better vestibule and most importantly better in adverse weather. I only ever solo camp tho.

  • @HuskyMike
    @HuskyMike Год назад +2

    While not a comparison to the Duplex, I did just spend my first 2 nights in the X-Mid Pro 2 instead of my Stratospire Li. The Strat has some benefits- true double wall, pockets and interior loops to hang things, but otherwise, I like the X-Mid better. Mostly because it's easier to set up. It does feel a lot bigger than the Strat but that is because without the true double wall, you lose the layer between you and the top of the tent. Time will tell if condensation is an issue. Since it's just me and my dog, both are palaces and headroom is not as much of a consideration.

  • @bcbslc6942
    @bcbslc6942 Год назад

    Thank You! Been trying to figure out if the Xmid 2 would work with a double pad setup. The answer is no, since you cannot stagger a double pad. Neither of us are going to want tent in the face, already lived that and we're out. Not only does that look uncomfortable to have 2 people in the tent, the condensation from being just a few inches from the wall will be worse. Looks like the Duplex XL or triplex is really the way to go for 2p.

  • @aussiehiker2
    @aussiehiker2 Год назад +1

    I like this channel but I believe this video could potentially be misleading to anyone considering both options. The xmid is superior in just about every aspect. That goes for the 2p and the 1p. Anyone considering both I'd disregard the headroom comment. Way more head room and room in general than the duplex. Once again that goes for the plex solo too.

  • @stevieceejustgoingforit25
    @stevieceejustgoingforit25 Год назад +1

    You're alone on this my dude. Crazy but everyone has their preference and opinions.The X-mid is the only tent I bought Twice cause its so good. (OG 1 Person from Drop, New Xmid-2) Great video but wild to think you would prefer Zpacks over X-mid after using both.

  • @elr05
    @elr05 Год назад +3

    Great video! I Don’t have a Dynema tent, but I’ll get the X-Mid Pro 1P for myself when it comes out. I live in the blustery Eastern Sierra and the Zpacks can’t compare to DD products when it comes to random unpredictable perfect-then-not-perfect weather. The x-mid looks like it will take care of me better ;)

    • @NikhilShahi
      @NikhilShahi Год назад

      Did you buy it? It released today.

    • @elr05
      @elr05 Год назад +1

      @@NikhilShahi yes I did :)

    • @NikhilShahi
      @NikhilShahi Год назад +1

      @@elr05 makes two of us.

  • @rogerc7972
    @rogerc7972 Год назад +6

    My 1st night in my Duplex a huge thunderstorm hit just after I got in it. I sat cross-legged watching the light show, and laughed out loud I was so happy with the front row seat at a awesome performance! I stayed bone dry except for a teaspoon of water in one corner. So worth the price of admission.

    • @normpeterson7767
      @normpeterson7767 Год назад +1

      But how did it do on condensation inside from your breathing all night? I just got the X-mid. Had lots of condensation in a humid, rainy environment, and I figured that's just the cost of having a tent that weighs about as much as my shoes.

    • @rogerc7972
      @rogerc7972 Год назад

      @@normpeterson7767 I haven't had it in the worst conditions yet, but coming from a SMD Lunar Solo which would rain condensation on me I'm thrilled! I just did the FHT with it and loved the room to spread all my junk out in there, and sit up without rubbing the roof.

  • @elevatelife-nk7896
    @elevatelife-nk7896 Год назад +1

    I also find it interesting that most other commenters seem to like the x-mid and don't seem to worry about head room. I'll say that when you have two people in the tent, it makes a HUGE difference and when one person has the tent roof or the inside netting in their face - it's definitely enough to feel claustrophobic! I wish more tent companies considered (and tested) their tents with two people inside a two-person tent. I will say that I do appreciate the extra vestibule room of the x-mid and the fact that the outer walls go all the way down to the ground (and have the vent up at the top of the pitch). The pole out of the way is nice, but I guess it never bothered me to have the pole in the middle, but I do dislike the rainbow door that falls to the floor in the duplex, so the x-mid wins there. Anyway, both great tents, but the headroom is a real thing with two adults. Just say'n.

  • @RonsWorld5
    @RonsWorld5 Год назад +1

    Great comparison video. The XMID can be set up without the rain fly if you get the StarGazer Kit. I cannot speak on the ZPacks Duplex it looks like a nice and capable tent. I love my XMID 2, especially the ease of setup with four stakes. I am 6’2” and have plenty of room above and all around. The tent has held up very well to heavy rain and wind. I treat the XMID 2 as a one person tent and keep my backpack inside. 🙏

    • @wellseasonedhiker
      @wellseasonedhiker Год назад

      This is true for the double wall poly tents, not the pro which is what he's comparing to. Still the xmid (I have both) is a far better tent. Not sure why MLO is suggesting otherwise,

  • @texasdirthawker
    @texasdirthawker Год назад +1

    I just bought my first ultra lite tent and thought heavily about whether to buy the xmid or zpacks. I can see your points about the duplex having more head room and can fit inside the xmid but I like the idea of having more room in the vestibules to keep out of poor weather better and as far as head room if I have my wife with me we can always sit in front of each other instead of side to side. I think the xmid handles rain and wet better. I went ahead and bought the xmid pro 2.

  • @globetruck17
    @globetruck17 Год назад

    I have a Duplex and it’s a great tent… but my biggest gripe is the lack of vertical clearance at the head and foot. I’m 6’1” and winter quilts will draw condensation from the low sloping ceiling. I also didn’t love the Duplex door and the fact that you must unzip the entire arch in order to enter or exit. Always seemed to have a lot of tension at the top of the zipper.
    I really debated the XMid, but I came across the Tarptent Dipole Li. It’s heavier than either of these, but it’s a true 2 person tent and has vertical struts that vastly improve head and foot room. I’m also impressed with the head and foot windows on the Dipole. So for anyone debating the Duplex vs XMid: I’d like to confabulate you by adding yet another fantastic option.

  • @1langeu
    @1langeu Год назад +1

    I used to have a tent like the Duplex in the 80s. It was a Fjällräven Everest. So the innovation in geometry is zero. The Xmid is much more innovative and thought out.

  • @PacemakerandButtons
    @PacemakerandButtons Год назад

    yes!! We did some thinking on this one and glad we didn't pull the trigger and get one. We have the Zpack TriPlex and we're sticking to it. We'll see how the Xmid progresses in a few more years. For two married hikers my wife and I couldn't do the head to foot sleeping with this design. they need a XMid pro3 for two+ gear 60" wide on floor width. and raise that other wall the falls in one persons face. I could overlook that but would be a nice fix

  • @Oldsparkey
    @Oldsparkey Год назад +1

    You can have the X-Mid Pro and the Zpack's Duplex. I will keep and use my Original X-Mid 1 ( 1st ones available on Drop ). There are more advantages to the X-mid family of tents then any others. Unlike other tents , The X-Mid has a four stake pitch without any guide lines unless you want them and then it's only 2 lines. With the X-mid you can disconnect the inner tent and have the outer tent as a Tarp set up. It's simple and quick to set up and take down. From the long waiting list for a new X-mid I would say that others think it's a much better tent. Just my opinion and no one else's.

  • @tomnoyb8301
    @tomnoyb8301 Год назад +1

    Condensation may turn-out to be the key determining factor?

  • @XwaYdesu
    @XwaYdesu Год назад +1

    Thanks for doing this review! Great atrention to details.
    I really like some of the Xmid improvements over the Duplex. But, yeah, that side to side headroom can make all the difference. The last thing I want, is water on my face first thing sitting up in the morning, from bumping up against a humid ceiling. And, while I personally need to either sleep flat or with my feet higher than my head, no thanks on the stinky trail feet in my face. So, sticking with my Duplex. Really wishing it had a few of those other features though!

  • @ingoor
    @ingoor Год назад +1

    From the websites, it looks like the Tarptent Double Rainbow Li is a bit lighter than the Zpacks duplex with Freestanding kit.

  • @ericschwartz9982
    @ericschwartz9982 11 месяцев назад

    Zpacks duplex also comes with a zipper model at the same price as the hook & loop model. And you can buy it now....and not have to sit on a back order slip. Just my dos pesos worth.

  • @phantomapprentice6749
    @phantomapprentice6749 Год назад +1

    X-mid pro is better and harder to come by so appreciate you keeping your duplex.. Don't get me wrong , they are both good but X-mid has inner wall and a more storm worthy design. Alsp not that it matters much but the X-mid pro 1 has a pocket

  • @Zhy151Tex
    @Zhy151Tex Год назад

    I got the regular x mid 2. At $300 for 2 pound tent basically. You can’t beat that. I am using it as a one person mainly so plenty of room for me

  • @chadbrow
    @chadbrow Год назад +6

    The Duplex may beat the X-Mid with side-by-side headroom, but the X-Mid has more end-to-end headroom. So two occupants could sit at opposite ends facing each other better.

  • @Anttik_
    @Anttik_ Год назад +6

    Kind of weird conclusion in this review. You find that X-mid is better in almost all aspects, but still you think Duplex is better. Things you find better in Duplex are the possibility to use it as self-standing tent and the headroom when two persons are sitting. Actually sitting headroom is better in X-mid, as Dan kindly explained, just don't sit side to side. And most people would never want to use these tents self-standing anyway.
    X-mid has better zippers, poles not in your way at the doors, more convenient vestibules for storage. And is roomier and better in windy conditions.
    I think the real question is should you get X-mid pro or the regular X-mid. 😉

  • @TheRealTomSelleck
    @TheRealTomSelleck 6 месяцев назад

    I want a true ultralight tent with a 50” floor so bad. Spouse and I are both side sleepers 25” pads are a must.

    • @MyLifeOutdoors
      @MyLifeOutdoors  6 месяцев назад

      The X-Mid Pro 2+ is it. I’ll be doing a video on it soon. It’s basically the x-mid 2 pro but with a 50 inch floor

  • @JohnConstantine646
    @JohnConstantine646 Год назад +4

    Great video as always, Steven, but I feel like the title of the video doesn't properly reflect the content.

  • @travisbard4670
    @travisbard4670 Месяц назад

    I have no doubt that the Duplex is a good tent. I'll bet I would like it. But my X-mid (not the pro) only put me back $250 and I love it. For budget friendly gear the x-mid IMHO is the best value on the market. Not knocking the Duplex. But I love my X-Mid. Great video.

  • @joanrusche6918
    @joanrusche6918 Год назад

    I have the original X MID 2. Headroom is not an issue for me when I’m sleeping. I love the large vestibules, and doors that stay off the floor. My original version has two pockets on each side.

  • @neilquinn
    @neilquinn Год назад +4

    I'll personally take easier pitching all day long. The amount of duplexes I see out in the field with HORRIBLE pitches is hilarious. In fact I might argue that I've never seen one with a good pitch. (Though I just do short backpacking trips, no thru-hikes)

    • @jilladams663
      @jilladams663 Год назад +1

      Agree on the horrible pitches for the Duplex. Enlightened Equipment had a photo of the Duplex that was cringe worthy. Just about every RUclips video I've ever seen of the Duplex is also cringe worthy. I don't know why it's so difficult to get right. My duplex pitch is drum tight and it really aint that hard.

  • @billyhorr7126
    @billyhorr7126 3 месяца назад

    the only negitive its a PIA tonset up and its not cheap BUT its light and when u backpacking long haul u need less weight

  • @classicautomotivenc
    @classicautomotivenc Год назад

    I would have liked to seen you compare as pitched weights of the two tents. X-Mid Pro 2 with its 4 stakes, and no guy line required, and the Duplex with its 8 stakes and 4 guy lines. It definitely evens the weight out a bit. As for the head room. Dan does not recommend sleeping head to feet, but he does encourage two people sitting opposite of each other when just sitting in the tent, then the head room is greatly increased for both people and you are actually facing your companion instead of turning your neck to look at them. Also, I would have liked you to mention that the pitched size of the X-mid pro 2 is 8'x9', while the pitched size of the Duplex is 9'x9'. I've been in both, owned multiples, and honestly the trekking pole not being in the center of the doorway is the seller for me. And the door not crumpling to the ground. And the storm worthiness of the Xmid. But I understand, to each his own. The Duplex has been king of the mountain and the standard for quite a while now.

    • @jimdeehr4283
      @jimdeehr4283 Год назад

      The footprint of the X-Mid Pro 2 is much closer to 7'x8' than 8'x9' (80"x100").