SR-72 Battles: Improved SR-72(mach 12): ruclips.net/video/R1r7wThM3Es/видео.html SR-72 vs Russian Air Force & SAMs: ruclips.net/video/onVSUUxwrqk/видео.html SR-72 vs Chinese Navy: ruclips.net/video/Els8ZXRPnrI/видео.html Which SAMS/Planes Can Intercept SR-72: ruclips.net/video/AOpqkzBA8bw/видео.html
The problem with the S-400 overachieving in the game compared to real life is because the game can’t really model the S-400’s limitations. The main reason why the S-400 is not performing up to spec in Ukraine, besides general Russian incompetence, is power. It is pretty well established that the systems don’t get enough power. So sure. It theoretically has a long range but it can’t actually use that range. And that’s hard to model
I think the 70k altitude limit is making this impossible to simulate. We all know the SR-72 would be 90,000+ and at that height most missile will lose a lof of energy before they get to the target
Plus the additional time to maneuver will increase the energy required to make the intercept. The low altitude is a double whammy in favor of the missile.
@@Yaivenov You can't maneuver the SR72 like you see on the video. It will literally disintegrate due to the G forces. It's turning circle is about 500 miles big.
@@MaxIsStrange1 I've been requesting CH to create THAAD! Along with Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System NSM, Modular SM-6! Plus a few other things... lol so far noda
This mod is forgetting one important thing. ECM's. The blackbird used ECMs's heavily and those systems heald up their end of the equation for keeping them from getting shot down, some of the systems were called "BLUE DOG", "MAD MOTH", "PIN PEG" and "BIG BLAST". The SR-72 would be untouchable if the creator added some of these kinds systems for the pilot to weaponize against those plebians down below. It's a trifecta of Speed, Altidude and ECM's all working together.
@@emmata98 I mean yeah, maybe, until you get another gotdanged crash from the ads in the games you put on the MFDs to entertain yourself on the long and lonesome flights
Just seen this According to Yuri Ignat, spokesman of the Ukrainian Air Force, the US are planning to deliver AIM-120 AMRAAM to the Ukrainian forces. He also adds that the range of those missiles will be 160-180km, which points to the AIM-120D version. In combination with F-16 this is going to be a powerful standoff weapon. Could you do a continuation of the Su 35 vs possible f 16s that could be sent to Ukraine now with the aim-120d.
@@grimreapers In real life, would the current (newest version) of the Eurofighter match / exceed the newest F15 radar (that is apparently really powerful)?
What if the SR-72 did have some ECM , It worked for the Vulcans when they penetrated the USA . Yes a different era but modern ECM would work I would think .
The SR-71 carried the same ECM suite as all the others. No reason to believe they would not include it on the -72, or even something more modern. I can understand not having chaff/flares. But one more antenna and 50 pounds of gear wouldn't hurt anything
0:57 The target is Putin's collection of Oasis albums, rarities, and bootlegs including the "Wibbling Rivalry" EP of the Gallagher brothers arguing in front of that journalist who had a tape recorder going.
LOL!!! Posted 27 seconds ago and 2 views! Hey, never been first in a GR video comment section before! 8:15 Hate to tell you, but on my phone I can’t even tell anything is written down there, let alone what it says. Mebbe keep that mind - you have to spell everything out for mobile users (at least those on older phones). 12:00 I do get the “Bend jt like Beckham” reference… THBBBBB!
Darkstar is probably much faster than Mach-5.5 Lockheed hints that it could be even faster than Mach-10 that complicates interception quite a bit and if it is capable of Maneuvering at those Speeds then it is unstoppable for any defensive system of any country
The only other issue here is that you have this over-protected. There is no way he would attempt penetrating space that heavily defended. The jamming tech is the SR72 is likely alien level. This new version isn't to take pictures.
"Modern" lol. Hey Cap, can I suggest you watch Habitual linestepper's videos? His shorts are hilarious. Also he's US Army and does radar/air defense so he's very knowledgeable. I can't get enough of the psychotic F-22 and grandpa B-52.
Pretty neat one here. What’s fascinating to me is that those 31’s are considered interceptors not fighters. They carry anti satellite missiles. That’s a fantastic set up and I’d like to see more.
Considering the US was able to shoot down a satellite going 17000 mph in the 80s from a jet. I'd be very surprised if modern missiles couldn't hit 6th gen aircraft.
Due a satellite doesn't turn. That's why the US and Rusia have shoot down many satellites. Is much more easy and more if you already know the path of the satellite
6th gen doesn't mean it's immune to missiles, it's just an incremental update in areas like stealth, range, speed, avionics, and most importantly, data links with drones
btw i just wanted to drop a comment that i love watching your vids. been into fighter jets my whole life and love playing some ace combat (dont have the skills for sim flight games like you and your team).
Is there a link to the R-37 mod for the Mig 31?(and hopefully the SU-35 and Su-57) GR you should have re-done this and gone a little closer to the S 400 lol I love these hypersonic vids Also, at the end you popped to 100K feet- would have been interesting to see if AAMs and SAMs can get up there if you do a loft trajectory like that, just for going over the target area
I think the answer is to slow down about 10% when you're anticipating that they'll fire a Fox 3, then accelerate up to max speed after you've confirmed launch. The change in intercept trajectory might be too much for the missile.
Bending it like Beckham would carry a decidedly different set of risks in the case of turning sharply in a manned hypersonic plane vs curling a free kick. Though some Man Utd fans might disagree; Red Army Men in Black, especially.
+GrimReapersAtomic *The U. S. Air Force / Lockheed Martin SR-72 Alfa's performance is Top Secret Ultra; but the SR-71 gives a minimum-performance ballpark.* Notional envelope of 4.0 Mach @ 100,000' MSL.
I in the comments, as a Canadian, understand and remember 'Bend it like Beckham', and I bet more then a couple Yanks will too, David Beckham was a minor celeb over here for a while.
Question: Can you limit the AI altitude? Like to Angels 20? Then allow the Dark Star to run unlimited. That should give you 40 to 60 thousand plus feet to play with.
My issues with this simulation is...1. The Darkstar is reported to have a max speed over Mach 10 and 2. The Darkstar's stealth capabilities, while still highly classified, I'd bet makes it harder to detect than either the F-22, the B-2, the F-35 and the B-21 combined. So I call BS.
Thinking directed energy weapons would be required...just need to advance the Laser weapons tech. Firing solutions are easy when the weapon is lightspeed fast
Why are the interceptor aircraft airborne? Shouldn't they be scrambled for a more accurate scenario or is it a limitation of the program? I can't imagine russia having the financial resources to maintain that large of a cap.
I would guess that thing that will make a SR-72 so effective is it's altitude limits. IF you can't do that in the game what I would try is ground hugging... Other thought would be to throttle back and drop altitude to gain maneuverability as the misses get close but it would not be ideal. I think they altitude increase would be the best option once the game adds it...
The sr 71 rarely actually had to go into the air space it was photographing. When you're dozens of miles high you can see out pretty far with a high Rez camera
Ok, if I may…almost every time as far as I can tell. The enemy knows the objective of the attackers. What if we set up a scenario where there are multiple objectives. Let them guess which one is the objective. Human pilots would be a huge plus.
I am unfortunatley am a news junky but I am also a retire Air Force flyer. The tactics in Ukraine are very unique and not what is usually expected. I would not use Ukraine as a 100% indication of what should be done in DCS.
Frankly I just don’t see the point in these hypothetical scenarios. Obviously, if there is a SR 72 or equivalent flying, none have been shot down. No F15 or F22 or F 35 have been shot down. No Su 57 have ever been seen in a combat theater and neither have any Chinese fighter aircraft.
Better not add segments in your video saying "Attempt 1", "Attempt 2" etc, because that indicates already that all the previous attempts have failed even before watching the video....
My suspicion of in-game S-400 overperformance isn't really based off any flight characteristics, it's based off all the smouldering craters that popped up on protected Russian-soil military assets around the same time 8 HIMARS showed up in Ukraine 😂 Not even HIMARS, there were Mi-24s in Belgorod and Tu-141s in Engels, certainly sounds ridiculous, but less ridiculous than Ukraine having something that could defeat multiple S-400 systems as they are claimed on paper.
Patriot batteries are either equally as bad as the S 400 or worse and they’re probably worse and this is coming from an American Russians have the best Sam systems in the world hand down so if the extra hundred is bad, the patriot system is even shittier
@@Red-238 it doesn’t really matter if it gets destroyed or not if he can’t even shoot down what is shooting at patriot in almost every war they have been, and have been proved to be underwhelming and subpar
@@mrprodigy7143 first thing first, go and check out Habitual linecrosser, he is a patriot operator and is a expert in this field, he also has a great video explaining how successful the patriot is, second the patriot is the first SAM to intercept a missile with a missile, and sense then it has gotten way better, third it has shot down almost everything that is has come to contact with, same can’t be said for the s-400, and also sense their introduction in Ukraine they have shot down every kinzhal that Russia has sent their way, speaking of kinzhal its not anything impressive, its just a iskander missile that is repurposed to be launched out of a plane and reach hypersonic speeds in a semi-ballistic trajectory, something in which is the patriots bread and butter.
if you ignore the 40n6e because it doesnt exist, then there is no point to this video because the sr72 isnt active yet 🤔. the point of this video is the best of russia vs the best recon thingamajig coming then the s500 should be there with the mig 41
the SR-72 if it flying at hpyer sonic would been seen from the infreaid heat sensors and heat sensor tactal links and the agis missle sistems heat detacion with the f-35 inferaid imaging camras would see this SR-72 when is giong hpyer sonic so qickly. that bacly any russin heat saeking weapon and detection sistem would also track and see it at super super long ranges. thers no ponit of hpyer sonic milles or aricfact if a sub sinoic and super sonic heat seaking and ir imgaing gided missle and ecro ocpic senros gieed sistems would just be so easy ofr them to tack and amke a very very long interction flgith path that would just get infronut of the hpyer sonic aircraft. that giong to end up of the hpyer sonic arcraft can't even react qick entogh before it gets shoot down. like i seaid THERE NO SUCH THING AS STAELTH HYPER SONIC MISSLES OR AIRCRAFT IN A PLANTS ATMOSHERE AS THICK AS EARTHS.
How somebody can say that S-400 is under performing when Ukrainian aircraft is not flying near the frontlines at all? Where S-400 is deployed, it seems to be working fine. Especially being a high value target for Ukraine by itself. It's vulnerable against small composite drones, especially in swarms, but there is nothing in the world effective against those for now.
@@dm1i HIMARS has hit many targets in Russia, most of these targets are protected by S-400. The only thing Ukraine had was GMLRS, there's absolutely nothing special about GMLRS rockets, so any S-400 system shouldn't have any trouble stopping the 2 to 4 HIMARS units that attack targets together. More to the point; the S-400 is put in places to protect important things, and when those important things explode then that's usually a good sign the thing doing the protecting failed.
@@unarmored9973 HIMARS had never hit anything in Russia because this is prohibited by USA. S-400 are deployed far from the frontlines inside Russias territory. GMLRS age usually just jammed, because GPS is their main weakness. As for shooting down GMLRS , drones and missiles, there are Pantsirs and TORs for that. GMLRS is doing nothing now. The only thing that manages to hit targets are Storm Shadow missiles used together with decoys to overwhelm SAM sites.
How Far Could Hypersonic 6th Gen SR-72 Penetrate Into Russian Air Defence? Judging by real life, as far as it wants tbh, Russia's air defence is pretty useless
Russian air defense is literally better than any air defense America has access to including aegis and before you call me a troll I’m an American the only difference between me and you if I don’t meet ride the shit out of America
@@jonathantoymaker A Russian troll wouldn't know a fact if it slapped them in the face... going back to the original comment, Russian air defense is not layed lol if it was then that S400 wouldn't have been destroyed the other day
@@fauzin3338 the USA can’t build hypersonic missiles and has pursued a strategy of getting their engineers for abroad, rather than graduating American engineers. The USA has systematically destroyed its K-12 education system on the spigot. A foreign engineers is going to get turned off. One friend I have in cyber security describe the USA strategy as “using Chinese engineers to contain China”. And it has be as disastrous as one would’ve guessed.
SR-72 Battles:
Improved SR-72(mach 12): ruclips.net/video/R1r7wThM3Es/видео.html
SR-72 vs Russian Air Force & SAMs: ruclips.net/video/onVSUUxwrqk/видео.html
SR-72 vs Chinese Navy: ruclips.net/video/Els8ZXRPnrI/видео.html
Which SAMS/Planes Can Intercept SR-72: ruclips.net/video/AOpqkzBA8bw/видео.html
The problem with the S-400 overachieving in the game compared to real life is because the game can’t really model the S-400’s limitations.
The main reason why the S-400 is not performing up to spec in Ukraine, besides general Russian incompetence, is power. It is pretty well established that the systems don’t get enough power. So sure. It theoretically has a long range but it can’t actually use that range.
And that’s hard to model
That target is clearly a thermal exhaust port for Russia's Not-Quite-A-Moon-But-Far-Larger-Than-A-Space-Station secret weapon.
Lmao 😂🎉
About the size of a Womp Rat in Beggar's Canyon.
I think it's Putin's holiday house and there are models visiting.
They want to grab some more blackmail to show his wife to embarrass his government.
I think the 70k altitude limit is making this impossible to simulate. We all know the SR-72 would be 90,000+ and at that height most missile will lose a lof of energy before they get to the target
Plus the additional time to maneuver will increase the energy required to make the intercept. The low altitude is a double whammy in favor of the missile.
@@Yaivenov You can't maneuver the SR72 like you see on the video. It will literally disintegrate due to the G forces. It's turning circle is about 500 miles big.
Good video. I am now interested in seeing what the SR-72 can do against a similar American setup involving F-15EX's, F-22's, Patriots etc. etc.
And EU including Typhoon, Gripen, Rafale etc.
Dont forget about Patriot PAC 3
The American equivalent to the S-400 (more or less) would be the Patriot and THAAD working together. Unfortunately, we don’t have THAAD in DCS yet 😕
@@MaxIsStrange1 I wonder how Iron Dome would fair
@@MaxIsStrange1 I've been requesting CH to create THAAD! Along with Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System NSM, Modular SM-6! Plus a few other things... lol so far noda
The real question is if the filter on the planes radar is set high enough.
This mod is forgetting one important thing. ECM's. The blackbird used ECMs's heavily and those systems heald up their end of the equation for keeping them from getting shot down, some of the systems were called "BLUE DOG", "MAD MOTH", "PIN PEG" and "BIG BLAST".
The SR-72 would be untouchable if the creator added some of these kinds systems for the pilot to weaponize against those plebians down below. It's a trifecta of Speed, Altidude and ECM's all working together.
The dark star looks absurdly hard to fly
Fly by wire would help alot.
probably computers would help massively rl
@@emmata98 I mean yeah, maybe, until you get another gotdanged crash from the ads in the games you put on the MFDs to entertain yourself on the long and lonesome flights
@@gundamator4709yeah, and with fly-by-wire upgraded to fly-by-optics & IFCS, seems like it'd basically be mandatory
@@Omniseedthen when you try to take control back from the computer, you hear, "What are you doing, Dave?" and crap your flightsuit.
Just seen this
According to Yuri Ignat, spokesman of the Ukrainian Air Force, the US are planning to deliver AIM-120 AMRAAM to the Ukrainian forces. He also adds that the range of those missiles will be 160-180km, which points to the AIM-120D version.
In combination with F-16 this is going to be a powerful standoff weapon.
Could you do a continuation of the Su 35 vs possible f 16s that could be sent to Ukraine now with the aim-120d.
Problem is these F-16's don't have long range radar so couldn't use the AIM-120D at more than 40 miles?
@@grimreapers In real life, would the current (newest version) of the Eurofighter match / exceed the newest F15 radar (that is apparently really powerful)?
What if the SR-72 did have some ECM , It worked for the Vulcans when they penetrated the USA . Yes a different era but modern ECM would work I would think .
The SR-71 carried the same ECM suite as all the others. No reason to believe they would not include it on the -72, or even something more modern. I can understand not having chaff/flares. But one more antenna and 50 pounds of gear wouldn't hurt anything
@@valuedhumanoid6574 I agree why wouldn't they . Makes perfect sense .
The SR-72 should really be at least low observable, and it's not The Old SR-71, and I wouldn't be surprised if it had an incredible jamming technology
How would you propose it achieve that LO capability? At that speed, RCS doesn’t enter the equation. There is just too much heat… IR is also a thing.
@@FloridaManMatty IR is more difficult to find
@@Anarchy_420at the speed it’s traveling the SR-72 would have a much higher IR signature than conventional aircraft.
@@infidel1993 ruclips.net/video/Fz6cd9tHiyM/видео.htmlsi=QNPfe966QJ_8za6d
@@infidel1993 I kno that's different however still explains the narrow view point of IR and theres such a thing as Plasma Stealth
0:57 The target is Putin's collection of Oasis albums, rarities, and bootlegs including the "Wibbling Rivalry" EP of the Gallagher brothers arguing in front of that journalist who had a tape recorder going.
LOL!!! Posted 27 seconds ago and 2 views!
Hey, never been first in a GR video comment section before!
8:15 Hate to tell you, but on my phone I can’t even tell anything is written down there, let alone what it says. Mebbe keep that mind - you have to spell everything out for mobile users (at least those on older phones).
12:00 I do get the “Bend jt like Beckham” reference… THBBBBB!
Same, and I've got a modem phone. But I trust Cap.
There was a RUclips update a few months ago that added the ability to zoom, the same way you would zoom to fill. Hope this helps
Darkstar is probably much faster than Mach-5.5 Lockheed hints that it could be even faster than Mach-10 that complicates interception quite a bit and if it is capable of Maneuvering at those Speeds then it is unstoppable for any defensive system of any country
Cool video as always thank you .
The only other issue here is that you have this over-protected. There is no way he would attempt penetrating space that heavily defended. The jamming tech is the SR72 is likely alien level. This new version isn't to take pictures.
"Modern" lol. Hey Cap, can I suggest you watch Habitual linestepper's videos? His shorts are hilarious. Also he's US Army and does radar/air defense so he's very knowledgeable. I can't get enough of the psychotic F-22 and grandpa B-52.
Would you intercept me?? I'd intercept me..... 😆 🤣
Yup already watch lols.
Pretty neat one here. What’s fascinating to me is that those 31’s are considered interceptors not fighters. They carry anti satellite missiles. That’s a fantastic set up and I’d like to see more.
You guys should have a TV show. People would watch this.
Thx Cap and Friends.
Considering cardboard drones are regularly taking trips to Russian airbases I’d say this thing can go anywhere it would like in Russia.
Considering the US was able to shoot down a satellite going 17000 mph in the 80s from a jet. I'd be very surprised if modern missiles couldn't hit 6th gen aircraft.
Well we know US missiles can
But the satellite doesn't make evasive turns.
Due a satellite doesn't turn. That's why the US and Rusia have shoot down many satellites. Is much more easy and more if you already know the path of the satellite
@@roli4040precisely👍
6th gen doesn't mean it's immune to missiles, it's just an incremental update in areas like stealth, range, speed, avionics, and most importantly, data links with drones
18:55 Who told you I like fun?! Give me the name of this birdie!
Hmm. Try this with the Reliant Robin super SAM. It would be fun, if silly. But silly is good too!
You guys need to try this once you can get the altitude and speed correct for the Dark Star.
Keira Knightly was fit in Bend it like Beckham
When isn't she ;)
you guys are just too damn funny and just too good, I for one enjoy your videos very, very much. thank ya`ll . . . 👍
I imagine the aircraft would have some sort of RCS assist for manouvering at altitude.
11:48 I understand this reference. And as an American, I don't know whether to be ashamed or not....
btw i just wanted to drop a comment that i love watching your vids.
been into fighter jets my whole life and love playing some ace combat (dont have the skills for sim flight games like you and your team).
Is there a link to the R-37 mod for the Mig 31?(and hopefully the SU-35 and Su-57)
GR you should have re-done this and gone a little closer to the S 400 lol
I love these hypersonic vids
Also, at the end you popped to 100K feet- would have been interesting to see if AAMs and SAMs can get up there if you do a loft trajectory like that, just for going over the target area
I think this version comes with R-37: www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3312137/
Well done
I think the answer is to slow down about 10% when you're anticipating that they'll fire a Fox 3, then accelerate up to max speed after you've confirmed launch. The change in intercept trajectory might be too much for the missile.
Exactly, or a minor change in trajectory after the missle launch to make the missle have to recalculate the lead. Or both
Bending it like Beckham would carry a decidedly different set of risks in the case of turning sharply in a manned hypersonic plane vs curling a free kick.
Though some Man Utd fans might disagree; Red Army Men in Black, especially.
I’m curious how vectored thrust would improve maneuverability at those altitudes
+GrimReapersAtomic *The U. S. Air Force / Lockheed Martin SR-72 Alfa's performance is Top Secret Ultra; but the SR-71 gives a minimum-performance ballpark.* Notional envelope of 4.0 Mach @ 100,000' MSL.
I in the comments, as a Canadian, understand and remember 'Bend it like Beckham', and I bet more then a couple Yanks will too, David Beckham was a minor celeb over here for a while.
Question: Can you limit the AI altitude? Like to Angels 20? Then allow the Dark Star to run unlimited. That should give you 40 to 60 thousand plus feet to play with.
I'll look but I doubt it.
200 mile truning circle, sounds like my car...
Could something like a THAAD system, made to counter near orbital-speed warheads, be a threat to this thing?
I appreciate any gaming scenarios that contemplate attacks on Russia.
This would help explain the development of the US "Mutant" missile.
My issues with this simulation is...1. The Darkstar is reported to have a max speed over Mach 10 and 2. The Darkstar's stealth capabilities, while still highly classified, I'd bet makes it harder to detect than either the F-22, the B-2, the F-35 and the B-21 combined. So I call BS.
Thinking directed energy weapons would be required...just need to advance the Laser weapons tech. Firing solutions are easy when the weapon is lightspeed fast
This was just great boys!
Why are the interceptor aircraft airborne? Shouldn't they be scrambled for a more accurate scenario or is it a limitation of the program? I can't imagine russia having the financial resources to maintain that large of a cap.
Now do the S-550 which is designed with hypersonic targets in mind.
I would guess that thing that will make a SR-72 so effective is it's altitude limits. IF you can't do that in the game what I would try is ground hugging... Other thought would be to throttle back and drop altitude to gain maneuverability as the misses get close but it would not be ideal. I think they altitude increase would be the best option once the game adds it...
We need thrust-vectoring missiles for high altitude and speeds.
100% valued, 100% viewer
'Bend It Like Beckham' (2002) - starring Kiera Knightley, Parminder Nagra & Jonathan Rhys Meyers
What are the members thar were mentioned at about 6:00?
I like planes with “long members”
The sr 71 rarely actually had to go into the air space it was photographing. When you're dozens of miles high you can see out pretty far with a high Rez camera
can you do f-16 mlu with apkws and pods vs shead swarm + cruise missiles? Us successful shot down cruise missiles with apkws in 2019
Cool
try against an S-200, the missile has considerably more range at high altitude
Which G and AOA must be with such maneuvers at M6? Does it even did such maneuver?
I think plane is limited to 3g.
@@grimreapers But on the video it looks like all 30G )
Ok, if I may…almost every time as far as I can tell. The enemy knows the objective of the attackers. What if we set up a scenario where there are multiple objectives. Let them guess which one is the objective. Human pilots would be a huge plus.
This commenter knows "Bend it Like Beckham".
The S400 has turned out to be very much flawed. It's not shooting down a Mach 6 jet.
Growlers can only intercept up to 3.1 mach
Bend it like Beckham has something to do with Keira Knightley.
How about looking at US Airforce Starship armed with 150 Toms of Tungsten rods against Russia or China ?
can you try this again with the SR71 at 85000 and M3.2 with the same setup??
Can try but I imagine it will get smashed at those speeds.
I am unfortunatley am a news junky but I am also a retire Air Force flyer. The tactics in Ukraine are very unique and not what is usually expected. I would not use Ukraine as a 100% indication of what should be done in DCS.
Super CAP - Best CAP today! 🎉🎉
If you were at !00,000 ft plus it would have been a lot easier.
We need cardboard drone simulations with human defenders
We make them here in Australia and send them to Ukraine
4:58 lol please fix it, not much more to talk about😅
Bend it … Good movie👍
The S-400 goes Mach 15 so not far?
I'd bet the sa-5 would get you.
Question isn't this a stealth aircraft so how is it being picked up on radar so easy failure in this scenario
Whoever said the SR-72 would employ stealth technology?
Frankly I just don’t see the point in these hypothetical scenarios. Obviously, if there is a SR 72 or equivalent flying, none have been shot down. No F15 or F22 or F 35 have been shot down. No Su 57 have ever been seen in a combat theater and neither have any Chinese fighter aircraft.
skip to 6:00
Couldn’t they just use satellites to take the photo?
Russian made mods performing better then they should be?!?! No I don’t believe it!!
Ukraine gets a lot of Leopard 1 tanks, apparently they se som use in them. . So if older hardware is ok, why not dust off a few SR-71?
I’m hearing rumors that warbirds are being sent soon too
Better not add segments in your video saying "Attempt 1", "Attempt 2" etc, because that indicates already that all the previous attempts have failed even before watching the video....
Beckham? Laughing stock in US. Thank his wife.
NEXT VIDEO, SHOULD BE ABOUT AMERICAN SETUP.
SUUUPPER CAP!!!!!
They dont need an absurd plane thats barely flyable to get pee tapes, or do they?
My suspicion of in-game S-400 overperformance isn't really based off any flight characteristics, it's based off all the smouldering craters that popped up on protected Russian-soil military assets around the same time 8 HIMARS showed up in Ukraine 😂
Not even HIMARS, there were Mi-24s in Belgorod and Tu-141s in Engels, certainly sounds ridiculous, but less ridiculous than Ukraine having something that could defeat multiple S-400 systems as they are claimed on paper.
Patriot batteries destroyed too - in war everything gets destroyed eventually
@@dexlab7539nope, not a single patriot battery or a unit have bean lost in Ukraine
Patriot batteries are either equally as bad as the S 400 or worse and they’re probably worse and this is coming from an American Russians have the best Sam systems in the world hand down so if the extra hundred is bad, the patriot system is even shittier
@@Red-238 it doesn’t really matter if it gets destroyed or not if he can’t even shoot down what is shooting at patriot in almost every war they have been, and have been proved to be underwhelming and subpar
@@mrprodigy7143 first thing first, go and check out Habitual linecrosser, he is a patriot operator and is a expert in this field, he also has a great video explaining how successful the patriot is, second the patriot is the first SAM to intercept a missile with a missile, and sense then it has gotten way better, third it has shot down almost everything that is has come to contact with, same can’t be said for the s-400, and also sense their introduction in Ukraine they have shot down every kinzhal that Russia has sent their way, speaking of kinzhal its not anything impressive, its just a iskander missile that is repurposed to be launched out of a plane and reach hypersonic speeds in a semi-ballistic trajectory, something in which is the patriots bread and butter.
if you ignore the 40n6e because it doesnt exist, then there is no point to this video because the sr72 isnt active yet 🤔. the point of this video is the best of russia vs the best recon thingamajig coming then the s500 should be there with the mig 41
the SR-72 if it flying at hpyer sonic would been seen from the infreaid heat sensors and heat sensor tactal links and the agis missle sistems heat detacion with the f-35 inferaid imaging camras would see this SR-72 when is giong hpyer sonic so qickly. that bacly any russin heat saeking weapon and detection sistem would also track and see it at super super long ranges. thers no ponit of hpyer sonic milles or aricfact if a sub sinoic and super sonic heat seaking and ir imgaing gided missle and ecro ocpic senros gieed sistems would just be so easy ofr them to tack and amke a very very long interction flgith path that would just get infronut of the hpyer sonic aircraft. that giong to end up of the hpyer sonic arcraft can't even react qick entogh before it gets shoot down. like i seaid THERE NO SUCH THING AS STAELTH HYPER SONIC MISSLES OR AIRCRAFT IN A PLANTS ATMOSHERE AS THICK AS EARTHS.
How somebody can say that S-400 is under performing when Ukrainian aircraft is not flying near the frontlines at all? Where S-400 is deployed, it seems to be working fine. Especially being a high value target for Ukraine by itself. It's vulnerable against small composite drones, especially in swarms, but there is nothing in the world effective against those for now.
You call not being able to hit GMLRS reliably "working fine"?
@@unarmored9973 Where this is came from?
@@dm1i HIMARS has hit many targets in Russia, most of these targets are protected by S-400. The only thing Ukraine had was GMLRS, there's absolutely nothing special about GMLRS rockets, so any S-400 system shouldn't have any trouble stopping the 2 to 4 HIMARS units that attack targets together.
More to the point; the S-400 is put in places to protect important things, and when those important things explode then that's usually a good sign the thing doing the protecting failed.
@@unarmored9973 HIMARS had never hit anything in Russia because this is prohibited by USA.
S-400 are deployed far from the frontlines inside Russias territory.
GMLRS age usually just jammed, because GPS is their main weakness. As for shooting down GMLRS , drones and missiles, there are Pantsirs and TORs for that. GMLRS is doing nothing now.
The only thing that manages to hit targets are Storm Shadow missiles used together with decoys to overwhelm SAM sites.
@@unarmored9973 and do you think American Sam system would do any better
S-500 says please go ahead and try 😂
The S-500 is not in game yet.
@@Mr.Su-35Flanker-E Model it like you did for jets and missiles you don't even have yet 🤣
@@jonathantoymaker the S-500 is like THAAD.. it doesn't shoot aircraft bruv
@@jonathantoymaker also 554 comments?!?!? Does Russia pay u? 🤣🤣 get a damn life and touch some grass
@@TFY-v8lthe s500 have missiles to shoot down AWACS, command planes and tankers, apart that it can also use the s400 misiles
You should have done this against humans then. Ahh
I'm rootin for Putin
Mr. Putin was not happy at CAP today LOL
Nazi
How Far Could Hypersonic 6th Gen SR-72 Penetrate Into Russian Air Defence? Judging by real life, as far as it wants tbh, Russia's air defence is pretty useless
The same though the US in the 50's and a u2 was shoot down by a s125.
That was before the Generals started stealing and selling half the equipment
@@robbarrett4038 we are talking about Russia not Ukraine.
Russian generals make money desapear
Russian air defense is literally better than any air defense America has access to including aegis and before you call me a troll I’m an American the only difference between me and you if I don’t meet ride the shit out of America
@@ser43_OLDC and it’s funny you’re talking shit about Russia why you can’t spell disappear correctly
IF YOU USED AN SR72 BETTER USE MORE SUITABLE S500 OR AN S550 THAT THEY ARE ALREADY EXISTING .... PLEASE NOTE RUSSIAN AIR DEFENCE IS LAYERED
According to who russian state media? They can't even afford to build SU-57S.
U can always spot a Russian troll lol they always have caps lock
Exactly 💯 but this is what they do to win...CHEAT
@@TFY-v8lYou can always spot the American fanboy ...hate facts
@@jonathantoymaker A Russian troll wouldn't know a fact if it slapped them in the face... going back to the original comment, Russian air defense is not layed lol if it was then that S400 wouldn't have been destroyed the other day
The sr72 doesn’t exist. By the time it does, Russia will likely have photonic radar systems that make stealth irrelevant.
Does photonic radar really exist though?
@@fauzin3338 prototypes exist. Once that happens production is inevitable. So, yes.
@@utiz4321 Then the US would probably have already researched it too. It always cuts both ways in these kinds of technological race
@@fauzin3338 the USA can’t build hypersonic missiles and has pursued a strategy of getting their engineers for abroad, rather than graduating American engineers. The USA has systematically destroyed its K-12 education system on the spigot. A foreign engineers is going to get turned off.
One friend I have in cyber security describe the USA strategy as “using Chinese engineers to contain China”. And it has be as disastrous as one would’ve guessed.