BMW X3 20d stage 1 acceleration | F25 | 2013 | re-test | 2 years and 40k km later

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 12

  • @AcceleratingCars
    @AcceleratingCars  11 месяцев назад +1

    What's your opinion on the results? How do you think this car stood this (little) test of time? (Yes, i know, the glovebox door needs some fixing.)

  • @ВеликоБанов
    @ВеликоБанов 11 месяцев назад

    👍 Good performance.

  • @BenPower123
    @BenPower123 2 месяца назад +1

    are the turbo and gearbox still doing well?

    • @AcceleratingCars
      @AcceleratingCars  2 месяца назад

      ​​@@BenPower123 yes, they are! At 214k km at the moment and daily driving the car. I had to replace the EGR some months ago though. For extra info, i had the engine tune done about 5 and 1/2 years ago, at about 95k km and i have done an oil change for the gearbox at about 115k km.

  • @valeriymanin5779
    @valeriymanin5779 11 месяцев назад

    Nice performance! And some notice: you specified 0-100 acceleration as 7.30 sec as the best run. But for the 1/4 mile run you achieved 7.25 sec of 0-100 acceleration. May be you should use this value in your Excel table.

    • @AcceleratingCars
      @AcceleratingCars  11 месяцев назад +2

      Hi, Valeriy! In the Excel table i have the best values achieved while performing the respective test. In the case you mentioned, although the best absolute 0-100 time was recorded while doing a 1/4 mile run, in the results sheet i have the best value that i got during the specific 0-100 test. Same goes for all tests. For example, 60-100 times are always faster during tests where the car is in full power (0-100 or 1/4 mile), than in the dedicated test. Despite this, in Excel i have the best times i get during the specific test. Usually i mention this in the final results card where i sometimes write 2 values for the same test (individual / overall).

    • @valeriymanin5779
      @valeriymanin5779 11 месяцев назад

      Makes sense. Nice. @@AcceleratingCars

  • @iurieboitov7380
    @iurieboitov7380 11 месяцев назад

    Good initial launch, but definitely slows down at higher speeds (trap speed is 143kmh in 1/4mile). Which, I think, is kind of expected with high torque, low(ish) hp diesels

    • @AcceleratingCars
      @AcceleratingCars  11 месяцев назад +3

      Thanks for your comment! You are right, acceleration drops quite noticeably at higher speeds. You can also feel this subjectively, while driving. Up to 80-90 km/h it has very good acceleration, to 130 km/h it's decent(ish), but after that it's not impressive at all. Despite not being that heavy, i guess the power level is just not there to overcome air resistance at high speeds.

    • @iurieboitov7380
      @iurieboitov7380 11 месяцев назад +2

      More than decent performance nonetheless (at legal speeds 🙂), combined with diesel efficiency too.

    • @AcceleratingCars
      @AcceleratingCars  11 месяцев назад +2

      @@iurieboitov7380 Again you are right. Overtaking, for example, at legal speeds is usually not a problem. As for consumption, it can achieve sub 5L/100 at a constant speed of 100-110 km/h, low-to-mid 6L/100 at 130 km/h and 10-11L in heavy (bumper to bumper) city traffic.