Oswald was mad but he wasn't stupid. If he opened fire at the limo while it was still on Houston it would speed past him and leave him a sitting duck for the Secret Service agents behind it.
It isn't how snipers kill their victims, and Oswald would have missed Kennedy altogether. Every sniper knows that its easier to hit your target if its moving away from you than it is if is moving towards yo, at that distance. Also, Oswald would have drawn attention to himself because the SS were FACING the book depository, they would have immediately looked up and seen the rifle and Oswald in the window. Also, exactly what aaronz7056 said.
@@aaronz7056 Snipers in a room do not as a rule stick their rifles out of the window for all to see, they sit as far back as possible from the widow where neither they nor their weapon will be seen.
@@tonyoliver2750 Swell. Oswald owned the rifle. Oswald smuggled the rifle. A man was seen in the window who could plausibly have been Oswald. No bullets or fragments were ever found that didn't match to that rifle. No unidentified persons were ever caught inside the building. Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the plaza. Witnesses directly under that window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Oswald lied to police, refused to cooperate, acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, and just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@rlsiler8663I read the full 888pg Warren Commission when I was a kid in high school. I remember reading about how the FBI ballistics lab had to install shims for the scope just to be able to zero the rifle. I had many years of rifle-shooting experience up to that point, and would gain many more since that time. I also read the eye witness accounts, and the travel background of Lee Oswald. The WC report turned me into a skeptic. It was actually scary reading it, as it felt like they were flaunting the cover-up with that report, not actually trying to paint an accurate picture of what happened.
I think once a lot of people started reading it they knew it was bullshit. I actually think that the report opened a lot of eyes and without it I think people would go on to the next thing to worry about
As an avid hunter of both varmit's and bigger game such as deer. I know from the hundred's of time's I shot an animal. That any and all of the impacting of the bullet striking any animal, "ALWAY'S" follow's the trajectory of the bullet, meaning away from the vantage point it was fired from. Assuming any and all regardless of how many were shot during that event. It's reported that they all came from a location behind the auto. There's debate of one being shot from the front, via the grassy knoll. "IF" the only shot's, meaning the supposed one from the grassy knoll didn't happen. Any and all of the impacting result's of the bullet would have been toward's the front of the auto, not to an degree to the rear of the auto. My question is now and has since first viewing the original film. What exactly was Jackie in the process of attempting to retrieve, when she obviously left her sitting postion, faceing the front to leaping and reaching to the rear upon the trunk of the auto? I heard and read that it was in part, a portion of John's scalp and or brain matter. He wasn't wearing a hat, so what was it she was attempting to retrieve? And the only way assuming the object was a portion of John's head. Only a shot from the front, could have caused it to go to the rear of the auto. And that gives credence to a shot causing a hole in the front wind shield, and what ever was found on the trunk by Jackie, had to come from the area knowing as the grassy knoll.
She was attempting to get out of the shooting gallery which is exactly what anyone would do. Took her a while to figure it out but she wanted no part of that vehicle. There were multiple gunmen and the headshot came from storm sewer. Mob hit. No question. The day of the murder my school had installed an intercom system. Shortly after lunch school secretary plays the live radio broadcast of CBS Walter Cronkite. Sort time later they dismissed school but it was surreal and no one was sure they should go home. Like September 11 exactly
Um, you are aware, aren't you, that blood and gore went in all directions, splattering everybody in the limo. Only damage to the windshield, still in the National Archives, is a crack caused by a bullet fragment that also damaged the chrome plating... from the INSIDE. The idea somebody was assuming they would frame this on a lone shooter from behind while standing squarely in front of the limo (where, exactly...?), firing through glass (!) and past the ears of a carful of passengers as he shot Kennedy in the face is laughable. Same goes for the grassy knoll, where anybody firing a rifle behind that flimsy fence would have been absurdly obvious and very visible.
@@doncook3584 No, she was attempting to grab a piece of Kennedy's head, as she always very firmly said. No credible evidence for multiple gunmen. Zero. Storm drain would be a lousy vantage point and anybody firing from it laughably obvious. Let me get this straight: they were assuming they would frame Oswald for this as they shot Kennedy in the face from yards away? Connally's said all the shots came from behind. Witnesses under the sixth floor window said the shots all came from directly overhead. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind and Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the photos.
Connally was seated a few inches lower than Kennedy and few inches closer to the middle of the car. If Connally had been turing slightly to the right, it might explain the odd angles. What does confuse me is that the autopsy photos show the wound in the back of Kennedy was about 4" lower than the throat wound. If LHO was shooting downwards, then a T3 entry wound in the back would be expected to exit even lower - ie about T4 or T5 level. If the bullet found a tissue plane and was deflected upwards (ie out the front of the neck, it would be hard to then go into Connaly and then end up in his left upper leg. Bullets do some strange things but.........
Exactly! No way the bullet struck his back at that angle and exits out the throat. Especially when the emergency physicians said it was a clear entrance wound from the front neck.
JFK's throat wound was more level with the ground, and came from the front. It was from a 6.5 Carcano fired from the apex of the fence on the knoll, if it went through his neck and embedded in the seat behind him. The frontal head shot would come from another shooter at the junction of the overpass and fenceline. Connally could have taken fire from TSBD and the Dal-Tex Bldg. The forensics points to a set of sequential ambushes along the kill zone on Elm. Look at a 3D map of Dealey Plaza, paying attention to the fenceline and where you would locate to place those shots. It's perfect really, with egress routes as well.
OMG, It's Tricia "the Troll" Griffith !!!! Apparently She had to Introduce Herself to Him at the end. He did Not seem Impressed, that's Hysterical, LOL !!! FYI - JBR - IDI
@@brianb6957 Not many semi auto rifles available for the public during that time. I think Remington made a semi auto deer rifle but it was nothing like the military rifles. This is of course to the best of my knowledge. I was a younger back then lol
@@brianfitzpatrick1183 I would be interested in perusing the catalog that LHO supposedly ordered his rifle from. I wonder if any copies are still around.
I’m not saying I accept the magic bullet theory or not, but I’m somewhat tired of seeing these so-called experts, who go through the whole analysis without acknowledging that the governor’s seat was lower and to the left by a few inches. It is a critical fact, but seems to be almost universally ignored by those who want to discredit the theory.
It was a jump seat, but Gov Connally was a tall & broad/wide man too. Also, that seat wasn't low enough or far enough to the left to make a difference for a SBT to work.
@@d.g.s.4121 Oh please… stop trying to discredit the evidence with such a weak point. You guys will ignore the evidence no matter how strong because it doesn’t fit a conspiracy.
@@jetcat132 There was NO EVIDENCE of the stupid SBT. It was entirely MADE UP FROM NOTHING by staff lawyer Arlen Specter. He made it up because otherwise, the WC would have had to acknowledge there was more than 3 shots--which was the entire basis for blaming the coup d'etat only on LHO. But LHO could not have done it, as he was on the 2nd floor cafeteria, calmly drinking a Coke near the machine, seen there barely over 1 minute after the last shot fired. Think of the timeline if LHO did it on the 6th floor: he fires the last shot, he has to gather-up the 3 spent cartridges, arrange them neatly all-in-a-row on the window sill or wherever they were, when later found (what killer does something that stupid to leave them there as hard evidence? But no fingerprints of his on those cartridges!), then had to get up, take the rifle and find a place to hide it somewhere among some boxes elsewhere, then start walking toward the back stairs, walk down 4 flights of rickety, creaky old stairs (making noise that two other 4th floor descenders never see or hear), then breathing harder than after the last two shots, go to the Coke machine, drop a dime in it, retrieve the bottle, and start drinking to hide his harder breath. That's when officer Marrion Baker barges in, sees him and demands he give his name while at the same time drawing his gun and shoving it in LHO's midsection. All within less than 90 seconds after the last shot! LHO doesn't blink, show fear, or is breathing heavily from all that he went through in less than 90 sec.! Does that sound logical if he was a shooter? Heck no! He passed a nitrate gunshot residue test at the Dallas PD later that afternoon, clearing him from shooting any gun, including killing officer J.D. Tippit. He was exactly what he said he was: a patsy to cover-up for the real shooters elsewhere in Dealey Plaza, in front (two locations), and another shooter(s) in the rear across the street, probably at the County Records building. LHO is innocent! "I'm just a patsy." And when asked why he did it, "I didn't shoot anybody, no sir!" That puts the lie to the lying WC that "reported" he did it for the nonsensical idea of "publicity" when he completely denied it twice!
Think about this.What are the chances out of one million shots from a sniper that one bullet can cause 7 wounds and that kind of movement.And remember Oswald was not considered a good sniper while in the military.My question is what dumb shit would leave the the bullet shells after you shot the president of America.Looks like to me somebody wanted them bullet shells to be found.I am not no Columbo but he could figure this one out.
Exactly! And who leaves the 3 shells all neatly lined up in-a-row instead of taking them so fingerprints or other evidence could not be linked to you? Nobody! Proving once more, the infamous 6th floor window outline was a planted piece to "prove" Oswald was the "guilty" person! He was never there! Barry Ernest book, "The Girl On The Stairs" (2nd ed., 2013) proves once and for all, there was nobody shooting from there, least of all LHO!
To answer your questions in order. Given the positioning of Gov. Connolly and the president in relation to each other and Oswald, the chances are basically 100% because that’s how they were lined up. Don’t forget, JFK’s seating position was higher up than Connollys and a full 6 inches further to the right. Not to mention JFK can be seen quite clearly leaning over the side of the car in footage leading up to the second shot, while Connolly is seated firmly inside. With regard to the notion that Oswald wasn’t a good shot, simply put this is a misunderstanding. He was a former USMC member who had obtained the grades of Marksman and Sharpshooter during his time in the military. As to why he left the shell casings, it’s quite clear from Oswalds actions leading up to that day that he wanted to get caught. In a way it’s a shame he was murdered so shortly after he killed JFK because it would have been interesting to see how his story developed.
Think about this: Wecht was a lying grifter. All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet. Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window. Recovered bullet is in fact in a condition consistent with causing the wounds. You expected Oswald to sweat leaving the shells were they fell when he already knew he was going to immediately flee the building and would have to leave his rifle behind since he couldn't carry it with him into the streets. Remember that Oswald in fact scored 18 out of 20 in rapid fire at targets 200 yards away as per his Marines scorebook, if you could have been bothered to research it.
When entering even soft tissue does not necessarily mean a straight-line bullet path. Coupled with with the fact that it hit bone; change of direction can certainly be an accurate assumption. With that said I personally find the single bullet theory hard to believe.
a) As victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up, his shoulder is driven down and his expression violently contorts between frames from the blow. One bullet. b) Connally was seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right. c) Multiple and mathematically precise computer recreations done over the years by various investigators have consistently demonstrated all the victims' wounds line up on a perfect trajectory, and straight back to the sixth floor window. d) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him first. e) Bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, as it would have, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrates. f) That bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle. g) Nobody planting any bogus bullet at the hospital within one hour of the shooting could possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot.
@@aaronz7056 One other point about someone planting the bullet. After five hours of surgery. Connallys doctor in front of the press said that the bullet was still in the leg. It was a non serious injury entry wound, so they barely looked at it. Turns out the injury it was only half as deep as the length of the bullet. So it was only half imbedded at its worst. Little doubt it came off in Connallys cloths, but who could have known any of this ahead of time. The last thing anybody would do is plant a bullet when it is much more likely it would still be in a person or in the limo. Unless, Connally was shot from underneath the Limo?
The rifle initially shown being held up by the strap is completely different from the rifle held up in the police headquarters. Why no one noticed that discrepancy at the time is, almost, a mystery.
He was a demonstrable liar many times over who spent the 1970's firmly testifying the evidence showed the shots came from behind before he started cashing in lucratively as a conspiracy theorist.
@@evangiles4403 How about getting your heads out of your …… Knowing Oswald is the key to the case, it tells you exactly why he did it and did it alone.
@@jetcat132 How about you READING, "LBJ: The Mastermind of the JFK Assassination" (2nd ed., 2013) by Phillip F. Nelson. Also, Barry Ernest, "The Girl On the Stairs" (2013) which proved from 2 witnesses on the 4th floor, nobody came down those same creaky, old stairs as they heard or saw nobody when they also descended the same only a few seconds after the last shot fired!
@@freeguy77 You know that whole thing about the girls on the stairs…? I don’t have time right now, but I’m going to tell you why the author is wrong, and exactly why the WC chose to not consider their testimony as part of the timeline concerning your boy Oswald’s movements through the TSBD after the assassination. Stay tuned…
@@freeguy77 The whole LBJ did it thing is ridiculous and not worth responding to. There is not a single shred of credible evidence that he was involved in any way, and there is no point in discussing that crackpot nonsense. Ok now about your “Girls On The Stairs…” Adams and Styles claim they ran down the stairs and didn’t see Oswald. They claim that when they got to the first floor, they immediately saw Billy Lovelady and William Shelley. Here’s the problem…. Lovelady and Shelley were together during the entire assassination. They both claimed that immediately following the shots, they ran to the knoll area to see what the commotion was, because a cop and onlookers had run up the knoll. Upon arriving at the knoll and seeing nothing, they testified that they milled around a bit, and it was at least five minutes before they returned to the TSBD. We also positively know Oswald was out of the building three minutes after the shooting and his encounter with Baker and Truly on the 2nd floor, because he was seen outside the TSBD by reporter Robert MacNeil who asked Oswald where he could find a phone. So if the first thing the girls saw when they came down was Lovelady and Shelley, there was no chance they would have seen Oswald on the stairs, because he was already gone by two minutes. They missed him, and they were simply mistaken in their estimate of their time in coming down the stairs. THAT is why the WC chose to not consider their testimony when laying out the timeline for Oswald’s departure from the building, not because they ignored it. You guys really need to get a handle on the facts, and the details. Quit getting your information from CT authors without fact checking them, unless you want to spread the lies.
It’s undisputed that one shot struck a curb and struck Mr. Tague in the cheek. Another shot striking Kennedy’s head was frangible or explosive and inconsistent with military Full Metal Jacket ammo that Oswald allegedly used. The magic bullet, CE #399, that caused seven wounds in Kennedy and Connolly wound up in pristine condition on a baby stretcher in Parkland Hospital. Gerald Ford altered the location of Kennedy’s back wound upward to reconcile the bullet wounds with the official government story. Interestingly, none of the four agents who handled the bullet in the chain of custody would identify 399 as the bullet they saw in evidence. Looking at the medical forensic records, Commission Exhibit 392, a magic fourth bullet, entered Connolly’s thigh, was never removed, and lies buried with the governor. All the evidence was manipulated, and none is reliable.
The problem with the Magic Bullet Joke is that Connally was not seated directly in front of JFK. The seating arrangement in the limo placed Connally some towards the left and lower than Kennedy.
Given that the Secret Service Agent who found the bullet says he found it in the back seat of the limousine, it was not the bullet that injured Connolly, i.e. the timing of the Magic Bullet doesn't work for one shooter. The timing of the head shots of the last second, according to Josiah Thompson, is also broken. Anyone who looks at the timing problems of the shots -- whoever the shooters really were -- can only come to one conclusion.
Yup. The "pristine bullet" proves there was at least one shooter from the front and that WC moved the bullet from JFK's gurney to Connally's to make their single bullet theory work.
The first shot should've been the easiest and the one most on target. However everyone knows the first shot missed. What if it was supposed to miss ? What if it was a signal ? Everyone says that only three shots were fired from the depository, why can't anyone do the maths ? They say the first missed, second hit JFK in the back, third hit JFK in the head. What about the bullet that hit the overpass, the one that hit the grass, the one that hit the chrome inside the car and the one that went through the windscreen? How many magic bullets were there ??
@@dev1346 Physical evidence we have of bullet impacts: 1. Curb on Elm 2. JFK's throat 3. Connally's chest 4. Connally's wrist 5. Connally's left thigh 6. Overpass pillar 7. James Tague's cheek 8. Limo windshield 9. JFK's head That's throwing out the windshield frame dent. The WC knew it had a major problem on its hands with way too many shots and impacts, so they needed to create not 1, but 2 magic bullets and 1 normal bullet that would account for 9 impacts. They actually posited a 10th impact with the tree branch for the missed shot. It's an exercise in mental gymnastics to smash it all together so they could have some thin story that avoided the obvious multiple shooter scenario staring them dead in the face. Kids who went to school, shut up when told, asked permission to raise their hands, and be good little boys and girls swallowed the WC, as the alternative is too uncomfortable.
@@LRRPFco52 Curb on Elm, overpass pillar, James Tague’s cheek - Shot 1 JFK’s throat, Connally’s back, chest, wrist, and left thigh - Shot 2 JFK’s head and windshield - Shot 3 It makes sense to me brother, still nothing there to disprove that’s how it happened. We don’t have to throw out the windshield, because it was caused by a fragment of the 3rd shot that hit JFK in the head. That fragment and others recovered inside the limousine were all traced back to the Carcano. The first shot didn’t hit a branch. It was concluded via an independent study completed in 2013, and first published in 2016. The first shot grazed the horizontal support of the light support at Elm and Houston just after the turn. It was deflected down range where it hit the curb, causing the cut to Tague’s cheek, then striking the overpass support.
Connely was sitting in the jump seat in front of JFK which was much lower (and shifted to the left) than the President was setting. You know so many critics of the SBT conveniently overlook or for whatever reason leave this VERY important detail out!!! Frustrating.
Thank you! I have been saying this for ages. They were not sitting in a straight line. If that was the case then yeah magic bullet, but you put them in the correct position with the president up and to his right it lines up perfect!
Thank God, some people who get it! The conspiracy theorists (like Wecht and Stone) totally mis-represent the single bullet theory so it can easily be dismissed as ridiculous. That’s called a straw man argument. It’s also a LIE, because Dr. Wecht (at the very least) should know better. And when the conspiracy theorists have to mis-represent the truth (lie) in order to make their case, what’s that say about the validity of their position?
Wecht knew that full well, that grifter didn't care. He staged recreations of the shooting using two actors absurdly seated bolt upright, both facing forward, at the same height and level. Just one of his many fraudulent claims.
The "Magic Bullet" was only slightly twisted. A bullet that did all of the damage that the "Magic Bullet" was alleged to have done would have shown a lot more damage than just a slight twist.
@@mattlynn2866 Governor Connally never said that. He had didn't know when JFK got hit. Connally had always said he was hit by second shot. He said he knew the first bang was a gunshot, and he turned to see if JFK got hit. He says he never saw him, he turned one way and was starting to turn another when he got hit.
@shermbloom879 then the governor and Mrs Connally both lied to the HSCA I really believe based on exactly what was said you're incorrect. But in some of the many interviews the Connallys gave I did here the governor say that. Mrs Connally was adamant that it was a different shot that hit her husband
...why don't you keep your madness going and say : " Gee....the anglicized version of the German name " Oswald" is EASTWOOD !! Therefore, the " Line of Fire" actor who's character feels guilty that he failed to save JFK in Dallas was REALLY THE SHOOTER !!! OSWALD=EASTWOOD !!!......AAAAAAHHHHHHH !!!!!!!!!
It's badly crushed at the nose, and flattened down one side (not pristine, as Wecht keeps lying), perfectly consistent with drilling through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling and broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs.
And , not to mention, Oswald was given that test( the name escapes me) , that is given to determine if a person had fired a weapon. It came back negative. Meaning he did NOT fire a weapon that day. Case closed
Case open: - he tested positive on his hands - a man was seen in the window who could plausibly have been him - no unidentified persons were ever caught inside the building - witnesses directly under the window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead - no bullets or fragments were ever found that did not match to the recovered rifle, the one Oswald owned and smuggled - Oswald immediately fled the plaza after the shooting - he was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as the man seen shooting Tippit and fleeing - he was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop minutes later - bullets from Tippit's body were matched to his revolver - he observed to police, "Well they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking them the penalty for cop-killing - he lied to police and refused to cooperate with any investigator - he acted so smug and placid he even convinced his own brother he was guilty - he refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association - his latent print was found on the rifle - his prints were found in the EXACT spots they would be on the sniper nest had he been firing from it - he made no attempt to blurt out anything about any conspiracy and instead just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked point blank on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?" But, have it your way, it must have been somebody else...
Dr. Wecht's view of the magic bullet is much more plausible than the Warren Commission's even though Connolly's seat was lower and to the left. Other major factors are the massive exit wound of 5-6 inches in the lower right of JFK's head noticed by the Parkland surgeons attending. Also, the many windows open in Dealy Plaza, and what about any crime scene analysis of the limousine? (The windshield, blood or tissue samples).
"and what about any crime scene analysis of the limousine? (The windshield, blood or tissue samples)." The limo was cleaned IMMEDIATELY after the occupants left to go into the hospital! The S.S. destroyed critical evidence of that crime scene by washing it down, scrubbing away blood, tissues, glass, etc., and then the limo totally revamped and remodeled with bulletproof glass, and other security improvements that LBJ then used. After a few years, it was flown to Dearborn, MI to be on display there, if I remember correctly. The S.S. were complicit in the coup d'etat, and with the destruction of evidence, they also were deeply involved in the cover-up. They prevented M.E. Earl Rose from conducting his legal autopsy at Parkland Hospital as Texas law commanded he do then and there after Kennedy was declared dead. The S.S. screamed obscenities, brandished their weapons (all in front of poor Jackie) and pushed Dr. Rose against the wall, telling him to stop going against their desire to whisk the body out of Parkland (and then) onto Bethesda Naval Hospital in Maryland. So the Navy (military) brass could commit a secret prior surgery before the autopsy--when they removed the telltale bullet fragments that showed shots from the front, and surgically covered the gross 4-inch diameter hole in the back of his head, to "prove" only shots from the rear could be "shown" in fraud x-rays and photos, as Navy photographer Saundra Spencer later said she denied the photos she saw later that were wildly different than the ones she saw and took.
Once the "official" story is entrenched and supported by willing defenders and a compliant media, it becomes "fact" and those that carefully and scientifically refute it are ignored or ridiculed no matter how convincing their case may be.
If there was a second shooter, to make sure the job was done, it still was coordinated by Russia as get back for the insult of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Oswald trained in Russia and just before the day of the assassination Oswald visited the Russian consulate in Mexico to get his game plan. I believe Ruby was a Russian agent in the US whose job was to take out Oswald so he could not divulge the truth of Russian involvement.
@@davidclark573Mafia were double-crossed by JFK and RFK, after Papa Joe negotiated with the Italians, Sicilians, and Russian Joos to rig the election in favor of JFK in 1960. JFK was supposed to pull Bobby off their backs, but instead made him AG, where he really went after Hoffa and the Mafia like a pitbull. OSS had recruited a lot of Mafia hitmen during the War, along with Russians and Nazi defectors/double agents. Mafia were some of the main smugglers involved in the Caribbean, Europe, and even Southeast Asia for CIA operations in the 1950s-forward. The Kennedy bros even asked Mafia to help them whack Castro. Johnson was facing a huge criminal corruption scandal from Texas, and hated the Kennedy bros. Literally everyone in positions of power around them wanted them gone. Jack Ruby was one of the Mafia stooges who ran casinos in Dallas, smuggled drugs and weapons for CIA, but was always broke. His brother was an informant for the Bureau of Narcitics before he even went down to Dallas.
THIS ASSINATION WAS A VERY WELL PLANNED CONSPIRACY WITH MORE THAN ONE SHOOTER AND OUR FBI , CIA AND OFFICIALS DID EVERYTHING TO HIDE THAT THAT EVIDENCE 😮
It’s funny you say that… because even since the official story that is the WC report came out in 1964, there have been over 900 books published on the Kennedy assassination. 95% of those are pro-conspiracy covering over 300 active variations of conspiracy theories. This has had a great deal to do with convincing the majority of the public that there was some sort of conspiracy to kill Kennedy. As many as 65% of Americans believe it was a conspiracy, with 20% believing it was the government. The uphill battle now is in trying to convince people that there was no conspiracy, that Oswald in fact did act alone. The amount of evidence pointing to him is overwhelming, yet the CTers cling to these misguided, misleading and in some cases, offensive theories.
This has shaken my heart. An American, a respected and honored one, KNOWS a person he believes (and accuses publicly for 60 years) assisted in covering up the assassination of JFK... Yetrepeatedly votes him into office.
Also, Connally was turning to his right when he was hit by the 2nd bullet because he recognized the sound of the first bullet and that it came from behind them.
Geared Ford moved the bullet wound in the upper back to the back of the neck, exiting the front. A high-powered rifle bullet firing a 160 gr. Full metal jacket bullet through your neck would instanty render you quadriplegic and unconscious. Kennedy would not be able to raise.his hands to his throat, elbows high.
No, his notations basically "move" the wound from above the shoulder to base of the neck, big deal. Never mind that autopsy photos and x-rays clearly show the wound's exact location anyway.
The " magic" bullet was not unnecessarily for Connolly it was there to establish credibility to the one man shooter scenario because it puts LHO'S ammo in the limo it later became easier to explain Connoly's wounds - he was a bit angry he had been shot at all. Notice the path of the wounds were only traced on images if his body not extended beyond
That's right. Remember "Lee Oswald by himself" is absolutely essential to the narrative not falling apart. A really interesting question to ask yourself is, "what rating (out of ten) do you think the actual plotters of the big event of 22nd Nov '63 would have ascribed to it after the act?" Granted, they finally got their kill within the ambush zone, but there are many, many other aspects to this kind of operation beyond getting your target. The head shot aside, I think it was actually very unsuccessful. If you assess all the operational aspects, I would say the plotters might have only given it a 5 or 6 out of ten because the "rear shooters" failed so dismally. Think about it... If the rear shooter(s) had made a fatal head shot, then the back-up forward shooters could have simply packed up and slinked off. More importantly, the cover-up would have been made so much less complicated than it turned out to be. There would be zero, "Grassy Knoll" controversy among many other suspicions. With a low level of public suspicion, there would likely have been very little independent research and only a few books might have been written. Hardly anybody would still be digging, and interest in it today would be near-zero. I believe the failure of those first "rearward" shooters was a massive blow to the covert and growing presence of the deep state and all their shenanigans.... even to this day, and the problem is so much worse now.
@@aaronz7056 the first big problem before we think too far about their position is that President gets hit and raises his hands to his throat because he is aware of a bullet passing through him once, but the Governor, whom this bullet hits thrice is compeltely unaware and from the video we can all see, is completely fine as of the time the president was already almost clutching his throat, ofcourse towards the end of that footage we can see when the governor gets shot and his reaction
Not exactly...down lower, but not to the left as has been reported. If you look at a photo of the jump seat in the back, not a drawing, it is not to the left 10" as many have tried to report. Besides, all one has to do is looks at the film to know Kennedy was hit first.
Gov. Connolly was riding in the "jump" seat. eighteen inches in from the door. Not directly in front of the President Kennedy as you show in you example.
Everyone does this. It is irritating. It wasn’t a magic bullet. The President was sitting higher and to Connelys right. It’s a perfect line. But everyone wants to keep the conspiracy going.
In the first minute he misstates "they go the murder weapon, an Italian Carcano rifle." The Dallas police found and documented a German Mauser rifle that did not match the three spent shells also found on the sixth floor.
It's because although there were reports given to the feds until the 25th that the gun found was a Mauser, the Warrenati insisted they'd made a mistake and the actual murder weapon was a carcano, which the feds likely already had. Hence all the fake order paperwork
Matter of fact, the evidence envelope signed by jesse curry and others pertaining to the governors left leg, stated that there were fragments inside. Debunks the magic bullet theory .
Congratulations Dr Cyril Wetch, you were right to criticize this ridiculous magic bullet theory! Any serious person can't admit this stupidity! Thanks to Paul Landis for his confession which finally condemns this magic bullet theory!
The assassination hearings were biased; Oswald was a decoy who was fooled. Roscoe White's wife worked for Jack Ruby. Roscoe shot Kennedy from the grassy knoll.
In that case we look forward to you now explaining away all of the following: a) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. b) Within 1-2 frames of Kennedy being hit, Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up, his shoulder is driven down and his expression violently contorts between frames from the blow and his lung being collapsed, all demonstrating one bullet, and from behind. c) Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard, and turned sharply to his right, the victims' wounds demonstrably lining up on a trajectory and tracking straight back to the sixth floor window. d) Landis' story, if he's even telling the truth, just backs up the idea the single bullet fell from Connally's leg and when he found it he placed it on the stretcher, which does nothing to invalidate the single bullet theory at all. e) That bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle. f) That bullet is in fact badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side, perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence firmly demonstrate. g) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would demonstrably have been blocked by Kennedy's body, meaning the same bullet has to have gone through both of them. h) Witnesses a few feet directly under the sixth floor window firmly testified the shots all came from directly overhead. i) Your hero Wecht staged recreations of the shooting absurdly using two actors seated bolt upright, at the same plane and level, both facing forward, knowing full well that wasn't true. j) He also shamelessly lied about the condition of the bullet, knowing full well it is NOT "completely undamaged." k) He firmly testified through the 1970's the evidence backed up the Warren Commission before he started cashing in nicely as a conspiracy theorist.
So, here it is, many people are under the guise there were MORE than a few shooters, wrong, the report was deliberately exaggerated for the purpose of raising people's curiosity 'mis direction', nothing new there! But it's intention worked, as the public at the time indeed, back shelved their memories owing to the confusing story they were hearing otherwise the ability to identify the real shooters if which there WERE 3! One front/back and side only, of course we know the patzy, but don't know the equipment used or the disguises and no, you'll never have the full picture tho it's irrelevant now.😊
@@randomsasquatchwithwifi4090 You must mean the O. Stone fiction film "JFK" which is a historical abomination that's packed with demonstrable fabrications and falsehoods; but to younger and thus more ignorant people, it's a documentary.
Zapruder's film shows JFK head exploding up and forward indicating a rear shot -- then his whole body fell back not just his head in a reaction and perhaps by his rigid corset type support On the other hand the severe damage to the rear of the skull looks like an exit wound.
Are most political killing close quarter affaires? A pistol, like Oswald’s, or a knife, was it the president of Japan, or a bomb? And is the killer is caught at the seen? Why if Oswald walked away to escape, did he leave his rifle where he did, to be found and used to easily trace him?
@@mikeharland3358 How about you think about this: - where, exactly, would Oswald "conceal" the weapon where an army of searching cops would not be bound to find it sooner or later? - Oswald would have been fully aware he would be zeroed in on as a suspect when he immediately fled the crime scene anyway and his absence would be bound to be noticed sooner or later - in fact, he DID "conceal" the rifle, dumping it where it was later found Of course, this weird and pointless side issue glosses over a few other details anyway: Oswald owned the rifle. Oswald smuggled the rifle. A man who could plausibly have been Oswald was seen in the window. No unidentified persons were ever caught inside the building. Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the plaza. Oswald lied to police (starting with his whereabouts during the assassination). Oswald refused to cooperate with any investigator. Oswald refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association. Oswald acted so smug and placid he even convinced his own brother he was guilty. Oswald just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked point blank on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?" Etc.
@@aaronz7056 - So you think Oswald's exit plan from the start was to leave his rifle, with his fingerprints on it, to be found by the authorities? Would you do that? I wouldn't. I would want it to take as much time as possible for authorities to figure out I was a suspect.
@@aaronz7056 - And there's the problem. If you're planning to kill the President and you want to get away with it, would you use your own gun? I think anyone who wanted to get away with it would use a gun not connected to them, wipe fingerprints off it, and wear gloves. Then they could leave the gun behind and it wouldn't matter as much.
What a poor misleading demonstration. This lady is not seated at the height JFK was in the limo. JFK was sitting higher than Connally. His right arm was resting on the car which caused his shoulder to be higher than just resting at his side. Connally was seated further left of JFK in a jump seat. The bullet wounds to both men match perfectly with the angle and direction of the bullets coming from behind from the direction of the 6th floor window. The autopsy diagram does not correctly depict where the bullet entered JFK below the back of his neck. JFK's arm resting on the car raised the area of his shoulder and back. The entrance wound is always smaller than the exit wound. The entrance wound entered from behind and the bullet exited from his throat. Connally's wounds line up and could only come from behind from the angle and direction from the 6th floor window. Connally could not have received his wounds from any other angle. The film shows both men reacting at virtually the same time. Demonstrations have shown that the 3 shots could easily be fired with that rifle. The first bullet would have already been in the chamber for Oswald to just need to aim & shoot. Only 3 bullets were fired. Only 3 shots were heard. All 3 bullets came from Oswald's rifle from his perch at the 6th floor window. Gun shot wound experts say the head wound was caused by a bullet coming from behind. The blast from his front right skull was the exit wound. That shot did not come from the grassy knoll.
You have any idea how much chaos and confusion was going on that day? Cops freely admitted to initially misidentifying the unfamiliar Carcano at first, big deal, but of course, for conspiracy theorists, the idea some police could have made an honest mistake is impossible to believe, it's much more likely and probable that somebody safely approached every cop to enter the building and persuaded them all to bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason after their ace hit man happily left the wrong kind of rifle, or multiple rifles, lying around the crime scene for an army of police and FBI agents to swiftly find.
The things about human trafficking is really real they most go get Small kids, they screen the woman. Most probably that's why JFK wife is still alive. How they perfectly missed her huge smiles
As for what became of the Magic Bullet, a bullet was found on Connolly's stretcher at Parkland Hospital and it was matched to "Oswald's" rifle. The bullet was slightly flattened at the rear where the power charge had pushed it forward, and it was otherwise nearly pristine. It had lost only a tiny fraction of the grains of weight than were found in Connolly's body.
@@grandadmiralahab9085 Either it was never fired from a gun or it was fired into cotton wadding. The "Magic Bullet" excuse was moot anyway; and so is the question of whether the shooter could have accurately fired three shots in rapid succession. The first shot hit a tree branch and glanced off the rim of a traffic light. Another bullet hit a curb near the triple overpass, causing a chip of concrete to hit a witness on the cheek. Of the alleged three bullets, that leaves only one bullet to do all the damage that three bullets were alleged to have done. Multiple shooters, anyone?
@@AmericanActionReport Even fired through a ton of cotton wadding the bullet would be distorted. Mass increases with velocity. This works both ways when considering what the mass is impacting. "Science" is a thing.
All bullets and fragments every were matched to Oswald's rifle, the stretcher bullet included. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
@@aaronz7056 not true. Many fragments were not tested. Over 50% of witnesses in Dealey Plaza said shots came from the railroad yards. Stop disinforming.
@@dphinman6952 Crackpot rubbish. What did I literally just say above? Most credible witnesses heard 3 shots total. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds with several seconds between each. Victims' reactions, 1-2 frames apart, clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet. Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right, the victims' wounds demonstrably lining upon a trajectory and tracking straight back to the sixth floor window.
The purpose of these things isn't to convince people that " my crazy magic bullet theory " is true, but to say if you think my crazy theory is wrong then there must have been a second shooter!
Wecht blatantly lies about the bullet's condition and about the positions of the victims during the shooting, it's a bit hard to afford him much credibility.
@@aaronz7056 Explain how the round entered his back to the right of his spine and then went up and exited through the neck on a downward trajectory? This should be good........
@@laurad2442 Possibly because as any idiot can plainly see the limo was demonstrably travelling on a downhill grade from the plaza. How about YOU explain away ALL of the following: a) All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. b) Stretcher bullet was also matched to Oswald's rifle. c) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo from behind. d) As Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his shoulder is driven down, his hat flips up and his expression violently contorts between frames from the blow. One bullet, and ergo, from behind. e) Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard, and turned sharply to his right. f) Wecht, on the other hand, demonstrably stages recreations of the shooting using two actors seated bolt upright at the same height, facing forward, knowing full well that's B.S. g) Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window. h) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been demonstrably blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them, and ergo through Kennedy's back and throat wounds. i) Bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side. j) Nobody planting a bogus bullet at the hospital within one hour of the shooting could possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot. k) Witnesses a few feet directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. l) No witnesses ever heard or saw any gunman firing from any other window in the TSBD or any other building. This should be even more good...
Uhhh, no, not right. We must have watched two different Zapruder films. If Connally is holding his Stetson hat up as high as you say, why do I see his jacket and not the hat when they come out from behind the sign? That was a big hat he had that day. I shouldn't even be able to see his face if what you say is true. Come on dude. Not a minute into this and you're already bullshiiiin' me. This guy is full of it if he thinks I'm too stupid to believe my own eyes. That's called gaslighting, and this guy might be pretty good at it.
He's just giving people the general idea to show how nonsensical the magic bullet idea is. Not giving you a mm accurate representation ready for Scientific American!
The reason that JFK was assassinated is common knowledge and so is the identity of the Agency involved, I find it incredible that people are still debating the event.
Would you like to share with me that reason and which agency just to see if it matches with mine . From my research it was a mysterious group known as the secret team and the reason was because JFK didn't want outside interference in running American politics .
@@geoffdrew5207 No I just find value in alerting the unwary when they are being misled by crackpots so paranoid they assume anybody not on board for this silly conspiracy crap must be a "bot." lol
No bullets or fragments were ever found that did not match to Oswald's rifle. The throat wound has to be an exit wound: the view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been blocked by Kennedy's body and the bullet has to have gone through him first. Let me get this straight: somebody was assuming they would frame this on a lone shooter from behind while standing squarely in front of the limo (where, exactly?), firing through glass and past the ears of a carful of passengers, and shooting Kennedy in the face....
@@hj179 Let me restate: a) no bullets or fragments were ever found that didn't match to Oswald's rifle b) as victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up and his expression violently contorts between frames from a blow c) victims' wounds line up on a perfect trajectory, and for that matter straight back to the sixth floor window d) the view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him before going through Connally d) stretcher bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle e) bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side f) if the stretcher bullet is a planted fake, it was planted by somebody who could not possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot g) there was no possibly vantage point from which any shooter could have been standing unseen from which he could have fired through the windshield (much less without hitting anybody else in the car) and getting Kennedy in the throat, and anybody firing through that windshield would never assume in a million years they would be able to frame this on Oswald...
"a) no bullets or fragments were ever found that didn't match to Oswald's rifle2 "@@aaronz7056 but of course Aaron omits to mention that MANY FRAGMENTS could not be NAA tested . he further omits to mention that the NAA test that was conducted on some fragments is now regarded as seriously flawed . and even further to that Aaron omits to mention that officially one shot missed and was never found .in addition witnesses have bullets either causing a fresh furrow in the grass , striking down by the manhole causing dust or concrete to fly up , and a witness said a shot struck the street behind the limo and caused sparks to fly up . " as victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames" Aaron its funny then that Aarons bible the warren commission said that there was atleast 1.5 seconds between both mens reactions .so much so that the commission had to ask connallys surgeon dr shaw could connally have had a DELAYED REACTION .to which he replied NO , NOT WITH THE SERIOUS WOUNDS HE HAD .so zapruders camera filmed at about 18.5 frames per second , so that is mean there is a gap of about 27 frames between both men reacting NOT THE 1 TO 2 FRAMES he claims . but Aaron knows all this , i already pointed out all this to him . but that wont stop him re posting what he knows is not true . "c) victims' wounds line up on a perfect trajectory, and for that matter straight back to the sixth floor window" Aaron what Aaron fails to mention here is that the trajectory he speaks of (from the warren commission ) has a bullet hitting jfk on the RIGHT OF THE NECK , above shoulder level . and the autopsy photos show the bullet wound irrefutably several inches lower down ON THE BACK and BELOW shoulder level just right of the spine .so if the obvious is not obvious Aarons trajectory is not only wrong but based on a provable LIE . but none of that will stop Aaron continually saying the TRAJECTORY IS PERFECT . "d) the view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him before going through Connally" Aaron this nonsense ASSUMES that any shooter was IN A straight and DIRECT line right behind jfk . and sat or kneeling so as to be about the same height in the limo as jfk . there are several problems here . oswald was supposed to be 6 FLOORS ABOVE JFK . second elm street curves left to right and film and photo shows the angle of the limo and the men in it at certain times during the shooting sequence . i will give a good example . i have been told that connally would have blocked any shot to jfk from the knoll . yet willis photo shows jfk and the knoll above and to his front and right , and shows a clear unobstructed view from the knoll to jfk . if oswald was the shooter he had to be sat not only 6 floors above jfk but also off to the right rear of the limo . the secret service OWN recreation photos and film show a white chalk mark on the jfk standin and the connally standin is seen quite clear , all from the 6th floor window . surely Aaron has seen these stills ? . "e) bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side" Aaron not according to expert medical witness testimony of which all but one dr said that ce399 the bullet in question could not have smashed connallys wrist . so again even the warren commission disputes Aaron . "f) if the stretcher bullet is a planted fake, it was planted by somebody who could not possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot" Aaron the problem here is that ce399 was never planted at parkland . 3 men saw the bullet that day and two of them (both experienced hunters and one was a former cop ) said the bullet they saw was POINTED TIPPED . the bullet in evidence is round nosed all most flat . g as usual involves much speculation on Aarons part . speculation is akin to theory , and is not proof .
@@aaronz7056 @Aaron Z Yes exactly _ "Into the neck and out the back shot from the front probably through the windshield. " as stated✔✔✔ and there were two men dressed as cops on the underpass.
Cyril Wecht is a passionate Dr who has been involved in the assassination since it happened and he is not a nut and anyone who doesn’t care about the truth of that day has no right to bitch about the mess we are in today. I don’t know if Oswald did it or if sponge Bob did it I just look at the two bullets I’ll give you the BS story on CE-399,run with it but before you do look at the third bullet the 6.5 carcano bullet was a full metal jacket but the head shot was a hollow point and shattered on impact and from the official X-rays you can easily see forty two shards from the bullet and was never found or is in evidence meaning two different bullets from two different weapons means two shooters=Conspiracy!
The crux of the issue is that there are two Cyril Wechts. First, there is Wecht the reputable forensic pathologist. Then there is Wecht the assassination buff. The first Wecht usually comes to conclusions very close to (if not identical to) those of other reputable forensic pathologists. The second Wecht repeats assassination factoids and bogus trajectory analysis.
Unless you hold your beliefs about the JFK assassination in a manner akin to religious beliefs (evidence and facts don't matter) what he's saying makes sense. One bullet did not travel through two men, striking bone and tissue, and emerge missing three grains of metal. In fact, there was considerably more metal found in Connally's body alone than was missing from the "magic bullet". That's true. What's the old line, "You can have your own opinions but you can't have your own facts"? And the final, formal investigation done into the assassination of JFK, in 1978, concluded that probably at least four shots were fired and there was a conspiracy to kill JFK - that was what the government concluded.
Does anyone understand that for Kennedys wound in the back to go upward like Wecht is saying, he had have been shot by some either laying on the truck of the car or laying on the ground close behind the car and then shot through the trunk. The car was going downhill. Tn the presidents back in the autopsy files is really high on the shoulder, right beside the bottom of the neck. The autopsy says it went in beside C3. The drawing is a pretty bad one, because it does look like the bullet went in at about C7 or T1. The problem is if the drawing is right. That bullet is coming out of JFKs chest. High powered rifle, there would be and exit wound and that bullet is still moving. Thats why it hit Connally. Wecht never explains where the bullet went if it didn't hit Connally.
@@81overon Yes, it is clearly visible between the T3-T4 vertebrae and off to the right near the middle trapezius. With the downward trajectory, it would have exited out the chest near the area of the manubrium or top of the sternum.
Perfect sense to whom Some of the best shooters in the country attempted to do what Oswald allegedly did and could not pull it off. The entire assaniation was completed by a select group of agents and the majic bullet was part of the scheme. Im a retired policeman and in 39 years never saw a projectile do as many things and with no damage to it. One has to look at all of the evidence with an open mind.
@@robertchristianson1187 That's right, "the best shooters in the country" couldn't pull off 3 shots over 8-9 seconds (as victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate) at a slow-moving target a maximum of 88 yards away. Where do people read this crackpot rubbish?
@@robertchristianson1187 How's this for looking at the evidence with an "open mind?" A) As the victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up, his shoulder is driven down and his expression violently contorts between frames from a blow. One bullet. B) Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right, the wounds all lining up on a perfect trajectory. C) The view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through Kennedy first. D) The bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition EXACTLY consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrates. E) If that bullet was a planted fake, the person planting it could not possibly have known: - a bullet needed planting at all - he would not simply get caught in that emergency ward with agents, cops and officials all over the place - exactly where to plant it where it would be plausibly tied to Connally - the "real bullet" wasn't still in Connally's leg, as even his doctors erroneously thought at first - he wasn't simply planting one bullet into evidence and blowing the whole plot F) Witnesses under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. G) Multiple and mathematically precise computer recreations by different investigators over the years have consistently demonstrated the wounds all track on a straight line directly back to that window. H) There is no evidence for a "select group of agents." Zero.
Once he looks at how everyone in the car was seated, this whole argument goes down the toilet. They didn't sit directly behind each other, or on the same plane. Sorry.
So his way of disproving the single bullet theory is to take 2 random people who aren't the same size or body type as either Kennedy or Connolly, and sit them in chairs directly behind each other, facing the exact same way, when even the most rudimentary knowledge of the case would tell you they weren't in that position at all. Connolly was in a jump seat, which placed him below and slightly to the left of Kennedy. The Zapruder film shows that Connolly was turning before the shot hit Kennedy's neck (either waving at the crowd or because he heard a first shot that had missed). You can also see that he's still turned when Kennedy is hit. If you put the volunteers in those positions the path of the bullet lines up perfectly.
@@jimbrown9817 View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him first.
@@aaronz7056 Nonsense. Look at JCc wounds. Straight line. If he was hit turned sharply to his right the bullet would have exited the middle of his chest.
Wecht has been proven wrong so many times on this issue, Michael Baden and Vincent Bugliosi for two it is hard to believe he’s still spouting this nonsense. Bugliosi’s book Reclaiming History proves irrefutably that Wecht is positively wrong on this issue
There were several shooters at various positions. That's why there are many inconsistencies with the crime scene. What the doc is saying is what most of the experts have been saying since that day
The magic bullet theory is just that, a theory. It was only created months after the autopsy. It was needed when the story of the missed bullet became known. The bullet path through JFK was never traced, it was assumed. The WC provided exhibits that "proved" the theory. Which exhibit do you feel best describes theory. The diagram that that shows the bullet striking JFL in the back, moving up to exit the throat, then moving down to strike JC, moving up to strike the wrist, then deflecting down to enter the thigh. The photo exhibit shows the bullet striking JFK in the back, exiting his CHEST and then striking JC. Which WC exhibit best represents the theory for you? The diagram with changing bullet angles and direction or the photo that has the bullet exiting JFK's chest? They both can't be right.
@@garybrewster5657It doesn't matter if Wecht is correct or not. The fact of the matter is that this was a coup d'etat. At least 6shots from at least 3 shooters. Read all you can about it and you'll see it. I realize that it's unsettling to find out that factions of our own government did this. Then covered it up. But it's the truth. Lee's sole contribution to JFK's assassination was to be blamed for it.
cyril wecht has been for his entire career this nations pre-eminent forensic pathologist , the "nonsense " you refer to is a nobody like you sniping at the heels of someone as accomplished as dr. wecht !
Best one for me is LHOs alleged shooting of JD. Tippit, LHO had on him a revolver, They found shell casings at the scene that matched LHOs revolver, NOW, 1st up, LHO would have to have been THEE dumbest MOFO on earth EVER to shoot a cop then stand there and empty the shells out of his revolver, OR 2nd up he had the worlds first and ONLY revolver that ejects shells, And I don't think Ex-marines/would be assassins would leave shells at a scene regardless of whatever gun they were using (Same as with the shells in the book depository) Lee may have been involved in JFK assassination but I don't think he killed him, he certainly didn't shoot Tippit (PS, Jack Ruby went for an X-ray and they told him to "wait here" flipped the X-ray on and blasted him with radiation, Cancer chewed him up in no time) Thanks for listening, PS I'm available for weddings, funerals or bar mitzvahs.
While I agree on the revolver issue he could have done a partial reload to keep 6 live rounds in the cylinder. I wouldnt walk around with a half empty weapon when I could reload.
@@snelgrave101 Not only that but the revolver had been bored out. So everytime the gun was fired, it left different and inconsistent marks on the bullets, meaning that they could not narrow it down to that revolver exclusively. Also, when the casings were found by a witness and handed them to an officer they both initialed the casings. One officer also radioed them in (can't remember if it was the same officer) and said that casings were found from a .38 auto. Not only were the casings in evidence from a .38 special but they didn't have any of the initials on them, so no chain of custody. And adding to what you said, in a time when you could buy a revolver from practically anywhere without a trail, why would you mail order one leaving a paper trail, and then deliberately leave the shells at the scene? lol
The chairs are not at correct height. Back seat was higher and offset from front seat.. front seat was jump seat. not saying the MB theory is correct, but this makes a big difference when you line up seats correction. and Wecht knows this, but he is being cute in the video. there is no zig zag line when you line up the seats correctly.
Chairs are in the wrong position and the wrong height. JFK was sitting higher than the Governor and the Gov. sat more inward , he was not sitting directly in front of JFK. The hospital diagram was also incorrect , the bullet hit JFK higher up in the back (almost the neck). It was a straight line , there was no turning of the bullet , no magical. It only deflected after it hit Connelly's wrist , then it changed it's direction and landed in his thigh and it was not in "pristine" condition as some say. One bullet did in fact go through 2 people from the school book depository building 6th floor. The headshot on the other hand , that's another gun with a different kind of bullet from the right front (grassy knoll).
JFK was not sitting higher, or if he was, it was an inch or two at the most. JFK was taller than Connelly by about 4 inches -- JFK was 5'11" and Connelly was 5'7", maybe 5'8". If you look closely at pics that day, you'll see both men having their arms on the side of the limo at various points, and JFK's seat is not at the door like Connelly's is, and the door is a little further out than the edge of where JFK is by a few inches (3-4 maybe). The idea that he isn't directly in front of him is a myth cooked up by Warren Commission apologists to make the magic bullet "theory" plausible. Even if he's not, the distance, is negligible. Putting someone in a chair directly in front of someone else is perfectly fine for demonstration purposes. Changing the distances to support what those that argue were in allegedly place in the limo would not change the outcome of the analysis Wecht presented here. Its a red herring at best and dishonest at worst.
@@scott1564 Connelly's seat (these were custom seats added to the limo , they are not factory from Lincoln) is much lower than the rear seats in the limo. Plus as you put it JFK is taller than Connelly which accounts for the trajectory in the ballistics. Out JFK's throat and into Connelly's back.
@@jimbrown9817 No of course not, I think it's much more likely some conspiracy knew it could safely approach scores and scores of police, FBI, Secret Service, ballistics experts, photographers, x-ray technicians, doctors, witnesses, whole commissions, etc. and persuade them all to obey illegal orders to falsify evidence, commit perjury by the dozen, and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason.
Here’s the real answer: The actual bullet that traveled through Kennedy and Connally pretty much disintegrated. There were still fragments in Connally when he died. But The Commission needed some kind of visual evidence to support their single-bullet theory, so they took one of the test-fired bullets from the FBI lab, that was only slightly damaged, and decided that was close enough to be called the “magic bullet”. Exhibit 399 did not hit anyone that day. It might have passed through a cadaver’s wrist several weeks/months later during a test firing.
How did they know they needed to plant a bullet? And why would they plant a bullet that looked like CE399? Why would they want to fight that battle? Why wouldn’t they have fired a test round and use fragments, or a more heavily damaged version? They didn’t even know the Zapruder film existed or what it showed until well after Parkland where CE399 was found. It’s just nonsense, just absolute rubbish.
@@jetcat132 The bullet found on the stretcher was not necessarily the same one that was finally submitted as #399. It was only after the Commission realized they needed to sell the single bullet theory that this magic bullet emerged.
The SBT theory cannot be disproved, simply because the exact parameters are unknown and the possible variants exceed "calculability". The SBT theory seems implausible, particularly in view of the slight deformation of the bullet. But, "implausible" is not the same as "impossible". There are other possible anomalies and occurances that now can only be studied in the "trusted" films (if indeed anything can be trusted). Only an utterly incongruous, perhaps irrational observation of a supposedly normal object or person can lead to major suspicion. I will point to the Zapruder film. Before frame 300, visible panning into the sprocket hole area, is the Babushka lady. The "camera" she holds up to her face lights up like a car headlight. It is not a flash bulb, because that only last less than a frame, and Kodachrome, unlike video, has no latency. The bright light lasts for several frames, possibly continues beyond the film area. Such a light emitting from a "camera" must be artificially placed inside or on the camera. It is a clear signal. Why send signals to the opposite side of Elm Street? Other signals appear to be sent. "Apron Man" marks the commencement of the operation, "Umbrella man" marks beginning of the ideal "kill zone", "Dark Complected Man" sends a walkie talkie "squelch as a signal to three shooter teams. "Babushka Lady" signals to the main shooter in the Eastern end of the Elm Street Pergola, one second before the head shot.
The gun is NOT considered inferior by "every gun expert". He also ignores the fact that the back seat sat a few inches higher than the Connelly's seat.
Connaly was hit from the side to align the wrist and thigh wounds,hit in the back from another shot from behind in another building.shots were coming from every where.Oswald was in the break room drinking a coke.
So, I guess the bullet that hit JFK disappeared into thin air after exiting his body unlike the bullet found in Connally that must have zipped around JFK's body to hit Connally.
They were run through by the same bullet. As the victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up and his expression violently contorts from a blow. One bullet. Connally was seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right, the victims' wounds all lining up on a perfect trajectory. View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him first. Bullet recovered from Connally's stretcher was matched to Oswald's rifle. That bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, as it would have done, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence demonstrates: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side. If that bullet was a planted fake it was planted by somebody who could not possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole conspiracy.
@@aaronz7056 , agree. I was being sarcastic. These conspiracy theorists never explain how these fourth and fifth bullets hit their targets and then disappear after hitting them. It obvious that after the bullet hit JFK it then traveled into Connally.
@@aaronz7056 Well said. Why is it a surprise that a bullet that went thru Kennedy and didn't hit bone would end up hitting Connally. Why would someone plant a bullet if Connally should already have a bullet in him? People have been misrepresenting the path of this bullet for decades by using false inputs.
@@aaronz7056dude you try way to hard to be anything but a paid disinformation specialist. Lengthy posts full of inaccuracies on EVERY JFK assassination video are a dead giveaway.
@@aaronz7056 Governor John Connally's account of the assassination shows that the single bullet theory is false if you compare it with the Zapruder film. This is something that I really only noticed recently. Connally said that when he heard the first shot, he turned to the right to see where the shot came from. He stated that when he was turning back to the left, facing forward, he felt an impact to his back, throwing him forward. He noticed he was covered with blood and realized he had been shot. His wife then pulls him down into her lap. Seems straight forward, and everything. At least that's what I always assumed. I figured the shot through Kennedy's back and through his throat entered Connally's back, exited his chest, hit his thigh, and wrist. Ok, sounds reasonable I guess, right? I never thought anything of it, until I actually compared Connally's account with the Zapruder film itself. This is where it gets interesting. The Zapruder film shows that Kennedy was shot in the back BEFORE Connally turned to the right. Connaly, according to his own account hadn't been shot yet, but Kennedy is hunched forward clutching his neck. Therefore, that shot DIDN'T hit Connally. So where did the bullet that exited Kennedy's neck go? If you watch the Zapruder film, at the moment Kennedy reacts to the throat wound, Connally's jacket collar flap seems to flip up. Perhaps the bullet exited Kennedy's throat, passed through Connally's jacket collar flap and either ended up in a car seat back or perhaps the front windshield of the car. Some witnesses claim they saw a bullet hole in the windshield. The bullet could have then struck the curb by the overpass. Now Connaly turns to his left, which is the moment he claimed he felt the shot to his back. He states he felt something like a fist slamming into his back, which threw him forward. When you look at the Zapruder film, this happens at the exact instant that Kennedy is shot in the head, not in his back. Could the bullet that hit Kennedy in the head be the one that also hit Connally? I don't know. The bullet trajectory doesn't seem to line up. But Connally was definitely shot at the same time as Kennedy's head shot. No doubt about it. Therefore, the single bullet theory is definitely false. Do your own comparison and you will see what I mean.
The "magic" bullet makes sense if you research the seating positions of the 2 men and consider Connelly had turned around in his seat to see what was happening after the 1st shot. It does line up with only a minor deflection when it hit Connellys wrist.
I thought so too. It's so simple that it's too simple to accept. The Zapruder film (stabilized & enhanced version) you can see they get hit at the exact same time. It's alarming how vulnerable JFK was, and how there wasn't enforced protocol with dealing with crime scenes, evidence, autopsy pictures... not allowing 30 people in one operating room. Seems a lot of this would never fly today, and that day changed so much it's intense. Also, in the Zapruder film just before the headshot you can see all 6 occupants of the car move in synchronization, indicating the driver tapped the breaks for a second. Probably confused from the shots but in my opinion seemed untrained to just hit the gas at the sound of anything that sounded like a gunshot.
@@robberezowski68 There's a video titled "The Zapruder Film Mystery" which is very interesting. If the info in that video is accurate then it means the Zapruder film was altered and we can't really trust our eyes. For example, look closely at the back of JFK's head, it doesn't get blown out as described by the Parklands doctors. There's a bright spot on his temple, almost like a tracer round. The back of his head seems to be blacked out in the critical frames to hide the damage because it contradicts the official story.
@@misterG2006 The Zapruder film was 100% altered. Zapruder himself even said so. He likely was hit in the back of the head but the final kill shot came from the front right milliseconds afterwards. The magic bullet was complete bs though. The back wound only goes in about 2" for starters.
Gerald Ford admitted to moving the back wound for the good of the country 😂 The reason people believe the Lonespiracy magic bullet crap is because they're scared of the implications of multiple shooters and the CIA involvement. But don't worry America, Allen Dulles investigated and found no CIA involvement 😂
@@robberezowski68 How do you accept the fact that the round entered his back just to the right of his spine on a downward trajectory and then somehow exited above the entrance wound and towards the left through the throat? How is that even possible? Even if that could have legitimately happened, then the round would have had to have exited upward from the neck and out of the vehicle.
This guy is full of crap...there was nothing unusual about that bullet going through both people..after going through the neck it tumbled down into Connally's back......then lost its energy and hit the wrist.......big deal.....
The pro-conspiracy camp holds that the magic bullet of the assassin not Oswald, is evident simply by its absence. _Datsa soma compelling argument dare_ .
Stick to the point. It doesn't matter which magazine, how illustrious it is or how they obtained the film, you studied it. Likewise, it doesnt matter who your friends were or if and when you supported any political adventure. 8 minutes could have been said in one.
The seating positions are inaccurate in the demonstration. Gov. Connally was sitting in the right side jump seat, not the front seat of the car. The jump seats are several inches INBOARD of the backseat positions where JFK and Mrs. Kennedy were sitting. (if you doubt this, simply find a picture of the Presidential limousine) So Connally was sitting several inches inboard of President Kennedy. The "Magic Bullet Theory" is not magical at all and the bullet trajectory makes a lot more sense when you consider the actual seating positions of the two men. In fact, this has been brought up several times before but there are still many people out there who don't seem to know. I do not doubt there was a conspiracy to kill the President. I believe it's highly possible there were even multiple shooters that day. But, I do think we need to be as accurate as possible with our claims. The "Magic Bullet Theory" itself is NOT accurate.
There are so many errors in this guys analysis. If you know the facts, and the exact flight path and how they were specifically seated. It is a single bullet fact.
@@rc4688 I've seen the film. Connally was facing forward. This is his testimony: "About the time I turned back where I was facing more or less straight ahead, the way the car was moving, I was hit."
Dorothy kilgallen. / Judy garland. Dorothy is part of , An Os shooting. Magical trajectories are references to Os and Oz . Ever watch real life events follow a movie ? Judy garland arrived in Hyannis port . Her home is in Hyannis port. After she arrives , she is greeted by the emerald king of hearts ♥️.. John Kennedy. This is the beginning of his end . Walter Disney’s end . Oswald is the rabbit smuggler who was one of David ferries fairy’s..
First hit, JFK throat (frontal). Second hit, JFK back (rear). Third hit, JC (rear). One bullet caused all JC wounds as he held stetson close to chest while turning right to see JFK. Fourth hit, JFK head shot (frontal). Bullet found in stretcher was planted, not from any wound. Two more shots may have missed (see Buddy Walthers bullet and James Tague wound/curb).
First shot : not in zapruder film/must be around the time that they turn to elm street.shot missed, but hit a guy (minor injury) in crowd that was watchin the president go by ... Second shot: hit kenedy and governor Third shot: jfk head shoot . rip JFK
A military weapons specialist was given the same kind of rifle and was asked to fire the same number of rounds at the same speed and was able to do it but without the accuracy needed to hit a moving target. Far too many holes need to be filled, I doubt that it will ever be told.
One thing that got me is WHY didn't LHO fire before the car turned from Elm St? It was closer, straight line of sight, and easier.
Oswald was mad but he wasn't stupid. If he opened fire at the limo while it was still on Houston it would speed past him and leave him a sitting duck for the Secret Service agents behind it.
It isn't how snipers kill their victims, and Oswald would have missed Kennedy altogether. Every sniper knows that its easier to hit your target if its moving away from you than it is if is moving towards yo, at that distance. Also, Oswald would have drawn attention to himself because the SS were FACING the book depository, they would have immediately looked up and seen the rifle and Oswald in the window. Also, exactly what aaronz7056 said.
harder shot with target coming at you. plus nest wasnt set up that way
@@aaronz7056 Snipers in a room do not as a rule stick their rifles out of the window for all to see, they sit as far back as possible from the widow where neither they nor their weapon will be seen.
@@tonyoliver2750 Swell.
Oswald owned the rifle.
Oswald smuggled the rifle.
A man was seen in the window who could plausibly have been Oswald.
No bullets or fragments were ever found that didn't match to that rifle.
No unidentified persons were ever caught inside the building.
Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the plaza.
Witnesses directly under that window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
Oswald lied to police, refused to cooperate, acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, and just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
Mark Twain said something very true that applies to this: Its easier to fool someone than it is to convince them they have been fooled
Thak you Sam Clemmons. Also Forrest gump.
I think that quip could sit on either side of the fence
I think not, the Warren Report was part of the cover up
@@rlsiler8663I read the full 888pg Warren Commission when I was a kid in high school. I remember reading about how the FBI ballistics lab had to install shims for the scope just to be able to zero the rifle. I had many years of rifle-shooting experience up to that point, and would gain many more since that time.
I also read the eye witness accounts, and the travel background of Lee Oswald. The WC report turned me into a skeptic. It was actually scary reading it, as it felt like they were flaunting the cover-up with that report, not actually trying to paint an accurate picture of what happened.
I think once a lot of people started reading it they knew it was bullshit. I actually think that the report opened a lot of eyes and without it I think people would go on to the next thing to worry about
What was he relationship between the CIA and Life Magazine (owner of Z film)?
Henry Luce was reportedly an asset.
Owner of the TSBD building was at that time, Byrd, a long-time CIA asset.
As an avid hunter of both varmit's and bigger game such as deer. I know from the hundred's of time's I shot an animal. That any and all of the impacting of the bullet striking any animal, "ALWAY'S" follow's the trajectory of the bullet, meaning away from the vantage point it was fired from. Assuming any and all regardless of how many were shot during that event. It's reported that they all came from a location behind the auto. There's debate of one being shot from the front, via the grassy knoll. "IF" the only shot's, meaning the supposed one from the grassy knoll didn't happen. Any and all of the impacting result's of the bullet would have been toward's the front of the auto, not to an degree to the rear of the auto. My question is now and has since first viewing the original film. What exactly was Jackie in the process of attempting to retrieve, when she obviously left her sitting postion, faceing the front to leaping and reaching to the rear upon the trunk of the auto? I heard and read that it was in part, a portion of John's scalp and or brain matter. He wasn't wearing a hat, so what was it she was attempting to retrieve? And the only way assuming the object was a portion of John's head. Only a shot from the front, could have caused it to go to the rear of the auto. And that gives credence to a shot causing a hole in the front wind shield, and what ever was found on the trunk by Jackie, had to come from the area knowing as the grassy knoll.
She was attempting to get out of the shooting gallery which is exactly what anyone would do. Took her a while to figure it out but she wanted no part of that vehicle. There were multiple gunmen and the headshot came from storm sewer. Mob hit. No question. The day of the murder my school had installed an intercom system. Shortly after lunch school secretary plays the live radio broadcast of CBS Walter Cronkite. Sort time later they dismissed school but it was surreal and no one was sure they should go home. Like September 11 exactly
Um, you are aware, aren't you, that blood and gore went in all directions, splattering everybody in the limo.
Only damage to the windshield, still in the National Archives, is a crack caused by a bullet fragment that also damaged the chrome plating... from the INSIDE. The idea somebody was assuming they would frame this on a lone shooter from behind while standing squarely in front of the limo (where, exactly...?), firing through glass (!) and past the ears of a carful of passengers as he shot Kennedy in the face is laughable.
Same goes for the grassy knoll, where anybody firing a rifle behind that flimsy fence would have been absurdly obvious and very visible.
@@doncook3584 No, she was attempting to grab a piece of Kennedy's head, as she always very firmly said.
No credible evidence for multiple gunmen. Zero.
Storm drain would be a lousy vantage point and anybody firing from it laughably obvious.
Let me get this straight: they were assuming they would frame Oswald for this as they shot Kennedy in the face from yards away?
Connally's said all the shots came from behind.
Witnesses under the sixth floor window said the shots all came from directly overhead.
Autopsy shows the shots came from behind and Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the photos.
@@aaronz7056 naive.
@@doncook3584 That's your idea of a solid rebuttal to all the hard evidence I listed above...??? lol
Connally was seated a few inches lower than Kennedy and few inches closer to the middle of the car. If Connally had been turing slightly to the right, it might explain the odd angles. What does confuse me is that the autopsy photos show the wound in the back of Kennedy was about 4" lower than the throat wound. If LHO was shooting downwards, then a T3 entry wound in the back would be expected to exit even lower - ie about T4 or T5 level. If the bullet found a tissue plane and was deflected upwards (ie out the front of the neck, it would be hard to then go into Connaly and then end up in his left upper leg. Bullets do some strange things but.........
Exactly! No way the bullet struck his back at that angle and exits out the throat. Especially when the emergency physicians said it was a clear entrance wound from the front neck.
Right even if the bullet was somehow able to tumble in Kennedy it would have tumbled up and out not into Connelly.
JFK's throat wound was more level with the ground, and came from the front. It was from a 6.5 Carcano fired from the apex of the fence on the knoll, if it went through his neck and embedded in the seat behind him.
The frontal head shot would come from another shooter at the junction of the overpass and fenceline.
Connally could have taken fire from TSBD and the Dal-Tex Bldg.
The forensics points to a set of sequential ambushes along the kill zone on Elm. Look at a 3D map of Dealey Plaza, paying attention to the fenceline and where you would locate to place those shots. It's perfect really, with egress routes as well.
Yep, and that there is the problem. Well one of them. The wound in the back was only 5cm deep
@@chickenfist1554 You make a 5cm hole sound like a flesh wound 😀.
OMG, It's Tricia "the Troll" Griffith !!!! Apparently She had to Introduce Herself to Him at the end. He did Not seem Impressed, that's Hysterical, LOL !!! FYI - JBR - IDI
Was the rifle that LHO trained with in the Marine Corp publicly available for purchase in 1963?
Anybody?
Around the time he was in the Marines the military was starting to switch from the M1 to the M14. Neither of which was available to the public
@brianfitzpatrick1183 Do you have any idea what a comparable weapon to the M1 or M14 was publicly available for sale at the time?
@@brianb6957 Not many semi auto rifles available for the public during that time. I think Remington made a semi auto deer rifle but it was nothing like the military rifles. This is of course to the best of my knowledge. I was a younger back then lol
@@brianfitzpatrick1183 I would be interested in perusing the catalog that LHO supposedly ordered his rifle from. I wonder if any copies are still around.
I love the "there was no lone gunman" theory. Question: If I'm hunting all by myself, with no one with me, am I not a lone gunman?
I’m not saying I accept the magic bullet theory or not, but I’m somewhat tired of seeing these so-called experts, who go through the whole analysis without acknowledging that the governor’s seat was lower and to the left by a few inches. It is a critical fact, but seems to be almost universally ignored by those who want to discredit the theory.
You are correct sir
It was a jump seat, but Gov Connally was a tall & broad/wide man too. Also, that seat wasn't low enough or far enough to the left to make a difference for a SBT to work.
@@d.g.s.4121 Oh please… stop trying to discredit the evidence with such a weak point. You guys will ignore the evidence no matter how strong because it doesn’t fit a conspiracy.
@@jetcat132 There was NO EVIDENCE of the stupid SBT. It was entirely MADE UP FROM NOTHING by staff lawyer Arlen Specter. He made it up because otherwise, the WC would have had to acknowledge there was more than 3 shots--which was the entire basis for blaming the coup d'etat only on LHO. But LHO could not have done it, as he was on the 2nd floor cafeteria, calmly drinking a Coke near the machine, seen there barely over 1 minute after the last shot fired. Think of the timeline if LHO did it on the 6th floor: he fires the last shot, he has to gather-up the 3 spent cartridges, arrange them neatly all-in-a-row on the window sill or wherever they were, when later found (what killer does something that stupid to leave them there as hard evidence? But no fingerprints of his on those cartridges!), then had to get up, take the rifle and find a place to hide it somewhere among some boxes elsewhere, then start walking toward the back stairs, walk down 4 flights of rickety, creaky old stairs (making noise that two other 4th floor descenders never see or hear), then breathing harder than after the last two shots, go to the Coke machine, drop a dime in it, retrieve the bottle, and start drinking to hide his harder breath. That's when officer Marrion Baker barges in, sees him and demands he give his name while at the same time drawing his gun and shoving it in LHO's midsection. All within less than 90 seconds after the last shot! LHO doesn't blink, show fear, or is breathing heavily from all that he went through in less than 90 sec.! Does that sound logical if he was a shooter? Heck no! He passed a nitrate gunshot residue test at the Dallas PD later that afternoon, clearing him from shooting any gun, including killing officer J.D. Tippit. He was exactly what he said he was: a patsy to cover-up for the real shooters elsewhere in Dealey Plaza, in front (two locations), and another shooter(s) in the rear across the street, probably at the County Records building. LHO is innocent! "I'm just a patsy." And when asked why he did it, "I didn't shoot anybody, no sir!" That puts the lie to the lying WC that "reported" he did it for the nonsensical idea of "publicity" when he completely denied it twice!
Think about this.What are the chances out of one million shots from a sniper that one bullet can cause 7 wounds and that kind of movement.And remember Oswald was not considered a good sniper while in the military.My question is what dumb shit would leave the the bullet shells after you shot the president of America.Looks like to me somebody wanted them bullet shells to be found.I am not no Columbo but he could figure this one out.
Exactly! And who leaves the 3 shells all neatly lined up in-a-row instead of taking them so fingerprints or other evidence could not be linked to you? Nobody! Proving once more, the infamous 6th floor window outline was a planted piece to "prove" Oswald was the "guilty" person! He was never there! Barry Ernest book, "The Girl On The Stairs" (2nd ed., 2013) proves once and for all, there was nobody shooting from there, least of all LHO!
To answer your questions in order.
Given the positioning of Gov. Connolly and the president in relation to each other and Oswald, the chances are basically 100% because that’s how they were lined up. Don’t forget, JFK’s seating position was higher up than Connollys and a full 6 inches further to the right. Not to mention JFK can be seen quite clearly leaning over the side of the car in footage leading up to the second shot, while Connolly is seated firmly inside.
With regard to the notion that Oswald wasn’t a good shot, simply put this is a misunderstanding. He was a former USMC member who had obtained the grades of Marksman and Sharpshooter during his time in the military.
As to why he left the shell casings, it’s quite clear from Oswalds actions leading up to that day that he wanted to get caught. In a way it’s a shame he was murdered so shortly after he killed JFK because it would have been interesting to see how his story developed.
Think about this:
Wecht was a lying grifter.
All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet.
Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window.
Recovered bullet is in fact in a condition consistent with causing the wounds.
You expected Oswald to sweat leaving the shells were they fell when he already knew he was going to immediately flee the building and would have to leave his rifle behind since he couldn't carry it with him into the streets.
Remember that Oswald in fact scored 18 out of 20 in rapid fire at targets 200 yards away as per his Marines scorebook, if you could have been bothered to research it.
When entering even soft tissue does not necessarily mean a straight-line bullet path. Coupled with with the fact that it hit bone; change of direction can certainly be an accurate assumption. With that said I personally find the single bullet theory hard to believe.
a) As victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up, his shoulder is driven down and his expression violently contorts between frames from the blow. One bullet.
b) Connally was seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right.
c) Multiple and mathematically precise computer recreations done over the years by various investigators have consistently demonstrated all the victims' wounds line up on a perfect trajectory, and straight back to the sixth floor window.
d) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him first.
e) Bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, as it would have, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrates.
f) That bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle.
g) Nobody planting any bogus bullet at the hospital within one hour of the shooting could possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot.
@@aaronz7056 One other point about someone planting the bullet. After five hours of surgery. Connallys doctor in front of the press said that the bullet was still in the leg. It was a non serious injury entry wound, so they barely looked at it. Turns out the injury it was only half as deep as the length of the bullet. So it was only half imbedded at its worst. Little doubt it came off in Connallys cloths, but who could have known any of this ahead of time. The last thing anybody would do is plant a bullet when it is much more likely it would still be in a person or in the limo.
Unless, Connally was shot from underneath the Limo?
@@shermbloom879 Precisely (except for the shooter under the limo bit).
The rifle initially shown being held up by the strap is completely different from the rifle held up in the police headquarters. Why no one noticed that discrepancy at the time is, almost, a mystery.
Rifle strap is adjustable, this is hardly secret knowledge, for goodness' sake.
Rip Dr. Wecht. I hope you finally find out the real truth behind 11/22/63. You were a great American.
He was a demonstrable liar many times over who spent the 1970's firmly testifying the evidence showed the shots came from behind before he started cashing in lucratively as a conspiracy theorist.
Never believed Oswalt acted alone. Did not make sense.
He never acted because it wasn't him - Please read about the french connection and Vietnam get your head around that first
@@evangiles4403 How about getting your heads out of your …… Knowing Oswald is the key to the case, it tells you exactly why he did it and did it alone.
@@jetcat132 How about you READING, "LBJ: The Mastermind of the JFK Assassination" (2nd ed., 2013) by Phillip F. Nelson. Also, Barry Ernest, "The Girl On the Stairs" (2013) which proved from 2 witnesses on the 4th floor, nobody came down those same creaky, old stairs as they heard or saw nobody when they also descended the same only a few seconds after the last shot fired!
@@freeguy77 You know that whole thing about the girls on the stairs…? I don’t have time right now, but I’m going to tell you why the author is wrong, and exactly why the WC chose to not consider their testimony as part of the timeline concerning your boy Oswald’s movements through the TSBD after the assassination.
Stay tuned…
@@freeguy77 The whole LBJ did it thing is ridiculous and not worth responding to. There is not a single shred of credible evidence that he was involved in any way, and there is no point in discussing that crackpot nonsense.
Ok now about your “Girls On The Stairs…”
Adams and Styles claim they ran down the stairs and didn’t see Oswald. They claim that when they got to the first floor, they immediately saw Billy Lovelady and William Shelley. Here’s the problem….
Lovelady and Shelley were together during the entire assassination. They both claimed that immediately following the shots, they ran to the knoll area to see what the commotion was, because a cop and onlookers had run up the knoll. Upon arriving at the knoll and seeing nothing, they testified that they milled around a bit, and it was at least five minutes before they returned to the TSBD.
We also positively know Oswald was out of the building three minutes after the shooting and his encounter with Baker and Truly on the 2nd floor, because he was seen outside the TSBD by reporter Robert MacNeil who asked Oswald where he could find a phone.
So if the first thing the girls saw when they came down was Lovelady and Shelley, there was no chance they would have seen Oswald on the stairs, because he was already gone by two minutes. They missed him, and they were simply mistaken in their estimate of their time in coming down the stairs.
THAT is why the WC chose to not consider their testimony when laying out the timeline for Oswald’s departure from the building, not because they ignored it. You guys really need to get a handle on the facts, and the details. Quit getting your information from CT authors without fact checking them, unless you want to spread the lies.
It’s undisputed that one shot struck a curb and struck Mr. Tague in the cheek. Another shot striking Kennedy’s head was frangible or explosive and inconsistent with military Full Metal Jacket ammo that Oswald allegedly used. The magic bullet, CE #399, that caused seven wounds in Kennedy and Connolly wound up in pristine condition on a baby stretcher in Parkland Hospital. Gerald Ford altered the location of Kennedy’s back wound upward to reconcile the bullet wounds with the official government story.
Interestingly, none of the four agents who handled the bullet in the chain of custody would identify 399 as the bullet they saw in evidence. Looking at the medical forensic records, Commission Exhibit 392, a magic fourth bullet, entered Connolly’s thigh, was never removed, and lies buried with the governor. All the evidence was manipulated, and none is reliable.
Finally someone who knows what they're talking about. I was beginning to lose hope!
All lies.
@@jetcat132 Warning: Shill confirmed
@@chickenfist1554 Haha thanks for the insult, now I know I’m in the club.
@@jetcat132 Well I figured after calling people liars it'd be 1 - 1
It's a fair comment though, my bad
The problem with the Magic Bullet Joke is that Connally was not seated directly in front of JFK. The seating arrangement in the limo placed Connally some towards the left and lower than Kennedy.
Given that the Secret Service Agent who found the bullet says he found it in the back seat of the limousine, it was not the bullet that injured Connolly, i.e. the timing of the Magic Bullet doesn't work for one shooter. The timing of the head shots of the last second, according to Josiah Thompson, is also broken. Anyone who looks at the timing problems of the shots -- whoever the shooters really were -- can only come to one conclusion.
The "magic bullet" was the first shot, it was never found, it disappeared.
Yup. The "pristine bullet" proves there was at least one shooter from the front and that WC moved the bullet from JFK's gurney to Connally's to make their single bullet theory work.
The first shot should've been the easiest and the one most on target. However everyone knows the first shot missed. What if it was supposed to miss ? What if it was a signal ? Everyone says that only three shots were fired from the depository, why can't anyone do the maths ? They say the first missed, second hit JFK in the back, third hit JFK in the head. What about the bullet that hit the overpass, the one that hit the grass, the one that hit the chrome inside the car and the one that went through the windscreen? How many magic bullets were there ??
@@dev1346 Physical evidence we have of bullet impacts:
1. Curb on Elm
2. JFK's throat
3. Connally's chest
4. Connally's wrist
5. Connally's left thigh
6. Overpass pillar
7. James Tague's cheek
8. Limo windshield
9. JFK's head
That's throwing out the windshield frame dent.
The WC knew it had a major problem on its hands with way too many shots and impacts, so they needed to create not 1, but 2 magic bullets and 1 normal bullet that would account for 9 impacts. They actually posited a 10th impact with the tree branch for the missed shot.
It's an exercise in mental gymnastics to smash it all together so they could have some thin story that avoided the obvious multiple shooter scenario staring them dead in the face.
Kids who went to school, shut up when told, asked permission to raise their hands, and be good little boys and girls swallowed the WC, as the alternative is too uncomfortable.
@@LRRPFco52
Curb on Elm, overpass pillar, James Tague’s cheek - Shot 1
JFK’s throat, Connally’s back, chest, wrist, and left thigh - Shot 2
JFK’s head and windshield - Shot 3
It makes sense to me brother, still nothing there to disprove that’s how it happened.
We don’t have to throw out the windshield, because it was caused by a fragment of the 3rd shot that hit JFK in the head. That fragment and others recovered inside the limousine were all traced back to the Carcano.
The first shot didn’t hit a branch. It was concluded via an independent study completed in 2013, and first published in 2016. The first shot grazed the horizontal support of the light support at Elm and Houston just after the turn. It was deflected down range where it hit the curb, causing the cut to Tague’s cheek, then striking the overpass support.
Traduscan Al Espanol estos documemtales estan interesantes
Connely was sitting in the jump seat in front of JFK which was much lower (and shifted to the left) than the President was setting. You know so many critics of the SBT conveniently overlook or for whatever reason leave this VERY important detail out!!! Frustrating.
AND the road is pretty steep downhill !!! Jumpseat is a fact, downhill road is a fact Connelly turned is a fact. I've lost all faith in Wecht.
Thank you! I have been saying this for ages. They were not sitting in a straight line. If that was the case then yeah magic bullet, but you put them in the correct position with the president up and to his right it lines up perfect!
So the jacketed bullet struck and destroyed all manner of bones from both men yet remained in almost perfect condition? Plz explain.
Thank God, some people who get it! The conspiracy theorists (like Wecht and Stone) totally mis-represent the single bullet theory so it can easily be dismissed as ridiculous. That’s called a straw man argument. It’s also a LIE, because Dr. Wecht (at the very least) should know better.
And when the conspiracy theorists have to mis-represent the truth (lie) in order to make their case, what’s that say about the validity of their position?
Because it's harder for people like that to profit off of tragedy when questions are actually answered!
But the Carcono isn’t an inferior rifle and the seats are lined up perfectly
Wecht knew that full well, that grifter didn't care. He staged recreations of the shooting using two actors absurdly seated bolt upright, both facing forward, at the same height and level. Just one of his many fraudulent claims.
The “lone wolf” story doesn’t make sense, you’re right
@@badpiggies988 Why, because you don’t like it?
The "Magic Bullet" was only slightly twisted. A bullet that did all of the damage that the "Magic Bullet" was alleged to have done would have shown a lot more damage than just a slight twist.
I have seen full metal jacket bullets that went through cape buffalo that you could reloaded and used over again.
Governor and Mrs Connally testified that Governor was not shot by the same bullet, 2 shooters done
@@54upchuck After hitting even one bone?
@@mattlynn2866 Governor Connally never said that. He had didn't know when JFK got hit. Connally had always said he was hit by second shot. He said he knew the first bang was a gunshot, and he turned to see if JFK got hit. He says he never saw him, he turned one way and was starting to turn another when he got hit.
@shermbloom879 then the governor and Mrs Connally both lied to the HSCA I really believe based on exactly what was said you're incorrect.
But in some of the many interviews the Connallys gave I did here the governor say that. Mrs Connally was adamant that it was a different shot that hit her husband
Single bullet facts, the Dr. is a nut.
Facts? Good one 😂😂😂
Judy garland. John Kennedy.
An Oz shooting with magical trajectories.
Jackie bouvier. Jack Kennedy.
An Os shooting with magical trajectories.
...why don't you keep your madness going and say : " Gee....the anglicized version of the German name " Oswald" is EASTWOOD !! Therefore, the " Line of Fire" actor who's character feels guilty that he failed to save JFK in Dallas was REALLY THE SHOOTER !!! OSWALD=EASTWOOD !!!......AAAAAAHHHHHHH !!!!!!!!!
C.S. Lewis (the fake one) is Judy Garland, is Bruce Jenner (the former one).
What is going on with the comments? Why no one talks about the bullet 🤔
It's badly crushed at the nose, and flattened down one side (not pristine, as Wecht keeps lying), perfectly consistent with drilling through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling and broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs.
CE399? It’s a hoax, and not a good one.
A bit of a Joker, Kennedy was sitting higher than Connolly and Connolly was also turned to his right.
And , not to mention, Oswald was given that test( the name escapes me) , that is given to determine if a person had fired a weapon. It came back negative. Meaning he did NOT fire a weapon that day. Case closed
The "Paraffin" test...
Case open:
- he tested positive on his hands
- a man was seen in the window who could plausibly have been him
- no unidentified persons were ever caught inside the building
- witnesses directly under the window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead
- no bullets or fragments were ever found that did not match to the recovered rifle, the one Oswald owned and smuggled
- Oswald immediately fled the plaza after the shooting
- he was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as the man seen shooting Tippit and fleeing
- he was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop minutes later
- bullets from Tippit's body were matched to his revolver
- he observed to police, "Well they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking them the penalty for cop-killing
- he lied to police and refused to cooperate with any investigator
- he acted so smug and placid he even convinced his own brother he was guilty
- he refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association
- his latent print was found on the rifle
- his prints were found in the EXACT spots they would be on the sniper nest had he been firing from it
- he made no attempt to blurt out anything about any conspiracy and instead just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked point blank on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
But, have it your way, it must have been somebody else...
@@aaronz7056 tufts of fibres from the shirt he was wearing were also found on the rifle found on the 6th floor .
@@aaronz7056liar, you will be held accountable on the day of your death.
@@rickjensen2833 I'll take that as a death threat and I've just reported it as such, you psycho.
Dr. Wecht's view of the magic bullet is much more plausible than the Warren Commission's even though Connolly's seat was lower and to the left. Other major factors are the massive exit wound of 5-6 inches in the lower right of JFK's head noticed by the Parkland surgeons attending. Also, the many windows open in Dealy Plaza, and what about any crime scene analysis of the limousine? (The windshield, blood or tissue samples).
"and what about any crime scene analysis of the limousine? (The windshield, blood or tissue samples)."
The limo was cleaned IMMEDIATELY after the occupants left to go into the hospital! The S.S. destroyed critical evidence of that crime scene by washing it down, scrubbing away blood, tissues, glass, etc., and then the limo totally revamped and remodeled with bulletproof glass, and other security improvements that LBJ then used. After a few years, it was flown to Dearborn, MI to be on display there, if I remember correctly. The S.S. were complicit in the coup d'etat, and with the destruction of evidence, they also were deeply involved in the cover-up. They prevented M.E. Earl Rose from conducting his legal autopsy at Parkland Hospital as Texas law commanded he do then and there after Kennedy was declared dead. The S.S. screamed obscenities, brandished their weapons (all in front of poor Jackie) and pushed Dr. Rose against the wall, telling him to stop going against their desire to whisk the body out of Parkland (and then) onto Bethesda Naval Hospital in Maryland. So the Navy (military) brass could commit a secret prior surgery before the autopsy--when they removed the telltale bullet fragments that showed shots from the front, and surgically covered the gross 4-inch diameter hole in the back of his head, to "prove" only shots from the rear could be "shown" in fraud x-rays and photos, as Navy photographer Saundra Spencer later said she denied the photos she saw later that were wildly different than the ones she saw and took.
@@freeguy77 That is the single most ridiculous post you have made yet.
Utter nonsense….. even what you got correct is without proper context.
Once the "official" story is entrenched and supported by willing defenders and a compliant media, it becomes "fact" and those that carefully and scientifically refute it are ignored or ridiculed no matter how convincing their case may be.
If there was a second shooter, to make sure the job was done, it still was coordinated by Russia as get back for the insult of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Oswald trained in Russia and just before the day of the assassination Oswald visited the Russian consulate in Mexico to get his game plan. I believe Ruby was a Russian agent in the US whose job was to take out Oswald so he could not divulge the truth of Russian involvement.
@@davidclark573Mafia were double-crossed by JFK and RFK, after Papa Joe negotiated with the Italians, Sicilians, and Russian Joos to rig the election in favor of JFK in 1960.
JFK was supposed to pull Bobby off their backs, but instead made him AG, where he really went after Hoffa and the Mafia like a pitbull.
OSS had recruited a lot of Mafia hitmen during the War, along with Russians and Nazi defectors/double agents.
Mafia were some of the main smugglers involved in the Caribbean, Europe, and even Southeast Asia for CIA operations in the 1950s-forward.
The Kennedy bros even asked Mafia to help them whack Castro.
Johnson was facing a huge criminal corruption scandal from Texas, and hated the Kennedy bros.
Literally everyone in positions of power around them wanted them gone.
Jack Ruby was one of the Mafia stooges who ran casinos in Dallas, smuggled drugs and weapons for CIA, but was always broke.
His brother was an informant for the Bureau of Narcitics before he even went down to Dallas.
THIS ASSINATION WAS A VERY WELL PLANNED CONSPIRACY WITH MORE THAN ONE SHOOTER AND OUR FBI , CIA AND OFFICIALS DID EVERYTHING TO HIDE THAT THAT EVIDENCE 😮
It’s funny you say that… because even since the official story that is the WC report came out in 1964, there have been over 900 books published on the Kennedy assassination. 95% of those are pro-conspiracy covering over 300 active variations of conspiracy theories.
This has had a great deal to do with convincing the majority of the public that there was some sort of conspiracy to kill Kennedy. As many as 65% of Americans believe it was a conspiracy, with 20% believing it was the government.
The uphill battle now is in trying to convince people that there was no conspiracy, that Oswald in fact did act alone. The amount of evidence pointing to him is overwhelming, yet the CTers cling to these misguided, misleading and in some cases, offensive theories.
@@davidclark573 Yes, I’m sure the Soviets were hoping for WW3. C’mon man, that is just an ignorant thing to say.
This has shaken my heart. An American, a respected and honored one, KNOWS a person he believes (and accuses publicly for 60 years) assisted in covering up the assassination of JFK... Yetrepeatedly votes him into office.
Kennedy and Connelly were NOT seated at the same height and Connelly was seated a bit inward to boot.
Also, Connally was turning to his right when he was hit by the 2nd bullet because he recognized the sound of the first bullet and that it came from behind them.
@@Daniel-sh3os
Exactly 💯 CORRECT
Thank you for the truth
@@Daniel-sh3os Connally was turning to his right? Did you read his testimony?
Nobody seems to speak about the jumpseat that Conley was sitting in 6 inches shorter than JFK seat
Geared Ford moved the bullet wound in the upper back to the back of the neck, exiting the front. A high-powered rifle bullet firing a 160 gr. Full metal jacket bullet through your neck would instanty render you quadriplegic and unconscious. Kennedy would not be able to raise.his hands to his throat, elbows high.
No, his notations basically "move" the wound from above the shoulder to base of the neck, big deal. Never mind that autopsy photos and x-rays clearly show the wound's exact location anyway.
@@aaronz7056 I didn't mean to imply that he somehow surgically physically moved the bullet wound. Geez. Lighten up.
@@jaredpeterson380 Sorry, you said he had "moved the bullet wound."
@aaronz7056 It's OK bro. I'm just being a smartass.
The " magic" bullet was not unnecessarily for Connolly it was there to establish credibility to the one man shooter scenario because it puts LHO'S ammo in the limo it later became easier to explain Connoly's wounds - he was a bit angry he had been shot at all. Notice the path of the wounds were only traced on images if his body not extended beyond
What the heck did you say....???
huh?
HE WAS NOT ANGRY HE WAS SHOT, BECAUSE HE WAS NOT SHOT 😊
@@daggen7273 What happened then, he stubbed his toe?
That's right. Remember "Lee Oswald by himself" is absolutely essential to the narrative not falling apart. A really interesting question to ask yourself is, "what rating (out of ten) do you think the actual plotters of the big event of 22nd Nov '63 would have ascribed to it after the act?"
Granted, they finally got their kill within the ambush zone, but there are many, many other aspects to this kind of operation beyond getting your target. The head shot aside, I think it was actually very unsuccessful. If you assess all the operational aspects, I would say the plotters might have only given it a 5 or 6 out of ten because the "rear shooters" failed so dismally. Think about it... If the rear shooter(s) had made a fatal head shot, then the back-up forward shooters could have simply packed up and slinked off. More importantly, the cover-up would have been made so much less complicated than it turned out to be. There would be zero, "Grassy Knoll" controversy among many other suspicions.
With a low level of public suspicion, there would likely have been very little independent research and only a few books might have been written. Hardly anybody would still be digging, and interest in it today would be near-zero. I believe the failure of those first "rearward" shooters was a massive blow to the covert and growing presence of the deep state and all their shenanigans.... even to this day, and the problem is so much worse now.
Cyril just had his own meter when it came to talking, a lot of alliteration etc.
Just one of those shining personalites. Missed will be he.
He also spent years telling demonstrable lies.
It would help if you got the seating positions correct. The gov. is seated down and to the left. Not even.
Absolutely incorrect
media.nbcdfw.com/2021/11/jfk-convertible-dmn.jpg?quality=85&strip=all&resize=850%2C478
@@mikeberg5003 Connally was seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right.
@@aaronz7056 the first big problem before we think too far about their position is that President gets hit and raises his hands to his throat because he is aware of a bullet passing through him once, but the Governor, whom this bullet hits thrice is compeltely unaware and from the video we can all see, is completely fine as of the time the president was already almost clutching his throat,
ofcourse towards the end of that footage we can see when the governor gets shot and his reaction
It was supposed to be yarhbough in the car johnson hated him and wanted him inthe car but kennedy wanted conally
Not exactly...down lower, but not to the left as has been reported. If you look at a photo of the jump seat in the back, not a drawing, it is not to the left 10" as many have tried to report. Besides, all one has to do is looks at the film to know Kennedy was hit first.
Jackie and Kennedy, I see reflections of Judy and Kennedy.
Gov. Connolly was riding in the "jump" seat. eighteen inches in from the door. Not directly in front of the President Kennedy as you show in you example.
Everyone does this. It is irritating. It wasn’t a magic bullet. The President was sitting higher and to Connelys right. It’s a perfect line. But everyone wants to keep the conspiracy going.
In the first minute he misstates "they go the murder weapon, an Italian Carcano rifle." The Dallas police found and documented a German Mauser rifle that did not match the three spent shells also found on the sixth floor.
It's because although there were reports given to the feds until the 25th that the gun found was a Mauser, the Warrenati insisted they'd made a mistake and the actual murder weapon was a carcano, which the feds likely already had. Hence all the fake order paperwork
Cops freely admitted to initially misidentifying the unfamiliar Carcano at first, big deal. This was cleared up 60 years ago.
The rifle used was the main battle rifle of the Italian army for a time. It was a decent rifle.
Called “the humane rifle”.
Maybe decent for combat. That doesn't make it a decent sniper's rifle.
That is like saying the Tesla is a decent car so let's use it as a drag racer
😂
correct and it was commonly available through magazine advertisments
Matter of fact, the evidence envelope signed by jesse curry and others pertaining to the governors left leg, stated that there were fragments inside. Debunks the magic bullet theory .
Congratulations Dr Cyril Wetch, you were right to criticize this ridiculous magic bullet theory! Any serious person can't admit this stupidity! Thanks to Paul Landis for his confession which finally condemns this magic bullet theory!
The assassination hearings were biased; Oswald was a decoy who was fooled.
Roscoe White's wife worked for Jack Ruby. Roscoe shot Kennedy from the grassy knoll.
@@frankbrzozowski6343 Hold up, the first part is spot on. The second part isn't confirmed although it wouldn't surprise me
That makes two bullshitters.
In that case we look forward to you now explaining away all of the following:
a) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind.
b) Within 1-2 frames of Kennedy being hit, Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up, his shoulder is driven down and his expression violently contorts between frames from the blow and his lung being collapsed, all demonstrating one bullet, and from behind.
c) Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard, and turned sharply to his right, the victims' wounds demonstrably lining up on a trajectory and tracking straight back to the sixth floor window.
d) Landis' story, if he's even telling the truth, just backs up the idea the single bullet fell from Connally's leg and when he found it he placed it on the stretcher, which does nothing to invalidate the single bullet theory at all.
e) That bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle.
f) That bullet is in fact badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side, perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence firmly demonstrate.
g) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would demonstrably have been blocked by Kennedy's body, meaning the same bullet has to have gone through both of them.
h) Witnesses a few feet directly under the sixth floor window firmly testified the shots all came from directly overhead.
i) Your hero Wecht staged recreations of the shooting absurdly using two actors seated bolt upright, at the same plane and level, both facing forward, knowing full well that wasn't true.
j) He also shamelessly lied about the condition of the bullet, knowing full well it is NOT "completely undamaged."
k) He firmly testified through the 1970's the evidence backed up the Warren Commission before he started cashing in nicely as a conspiracy theorist.
So, here it is, many people are under the guise there were MORE than a few shooters, wrong, the report was deliberately exaggerated for the purpose of raising people's curiosity 'mis direction', nothing new there!
But it's intention worked, as the public at the time indeed, back shelved their memories owing to the confusing story they were hearing otherwise the ability to identify the real shooters if which there WERE 3!
One front/back and side only, of course we know the patzy, but don't know the equipment used or the disguises and no, you'll never have the full picture tho it's irrelevant now.😊
Back and to the left. Back and to the left.
@Random Sasquatch With WiFi An empty slogan, which is defeated by the facts.
@@apointofinterest8574 chill....it popped in my head from the Kevin Costner movie.
@@randomsasquatchwithwifi4090 You must mean the O. Stone fiction film "JFK" which is a historical abomination that's packed with demonstrable fabrications and falsehoods; but to younger and thus more ignorant people, it's a documentary.
@@randomsasquatchwithwifi4090 Lol. I thought it was a Seinfeld reference when Kramer & Newman got spit on!
Direction a person's head goes on being shot is meaningless regarding what direction the bullet came from.
Zapruder's film shows JFK head exploding up and forward indicating a rear shot -- then his whole body fell back not just his head in a reaction and perhaps by his rigid corset type support
On the other hand the severe damage to the rear of the skull looks like an exit wound.
Are most political killing close quarter affaires? A pistol, like Oswald’s, or a knife, was it the president of Japan, or a bomb? And is the killer is caught at the seen? Why if Oswald walked away to escape, did he leave his rifle where he did, to be found and used to easily trace him?
So... you expected Oswald to carry the rifle with him into the street...?
@@aaronz7056 Don’t be silly. If it were you, would you not make plans to conceal your weapon? Wake up, think.
@@mikeharland3358 How about you think about this:
- where, exactly, would Oswald "conceal" the weapon where an army of searching cops would not be bound to find it sooner or later?
- Oswald would have been fully aware he would be zeroed in on as a suspect when he immediately fled the crime scene anyway and his absence would be bound to be noticed sooner or later
- in fact, he DID "conceal" the rifle, dumping it where it was later found
Of course, this weird and pointless side issue glosses over a few other details anyway:
Oswald owned the rifle.
Oswald smuggled the rifle.
A man who could plausibly have been Oswald was seen in the window.
No unidentified persons were ever caught inside the building.
Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the plaza.
Oswald lied to police (starting with his whereabouts during the assassination).
Oswald refused to cooperate with any investigator.
Oswald refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association.
Oswald acted so smug and placid he even convinced his own brother he was guilty.
Oswald just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked point blank on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
Etc.
@@aaronz7056 - So you think Oswald's exit plan from the start was to leave his rifle, with his fingerprints on it, to be found by the authorities? Would you do that? I wouldn't. I would want it to take as much time as possible for authorities to figure out I was a suspect.
@@aaronz7056 - And there's the problem. If you're planning to kill the President and you want to get away with it, would you use your own gun? I think anyone who wanted to get away with it would use a gun not connected to them, wipe fingerprints off it, and wear gloves. Then they could leave the gun behind and it wouldn't matter as much.
What a poor misleading demonstration. This lady is not seated at the height JFK was in the limo.
JFK was sitting higher than Connally.
His right arm was resting on the car which caused his shoulder to be higher than just resting at his side.
Connally was seated further left of JFK in a jump seat.
The bullet wounds to both men match perfectly with the angle and direction of the bullets coming from behind from the direction of the 6th floor window.
The autopsy diagram does not correctly depict where the bullet entered JFK below the back of his neck. JFK's arm resting on the car raised the area of his shoulder and back. The entrance wound is always smaller than the exit wound.
The entrance wound entered from behind and the bullet exited from his throat. Connally's wounds line up and could only come from behind from the angle and direction from the 6th floor window.
Connally could not have received his wounds from any other angle.
The film shows both men reacting at virtually the same time.
Demonstrations have shown that the 3 shots could easily be fired with that rifle. The first bullet would have already been in the chamber for Oswald to just need to aim & shoot.
Only 3 bullets were fired. Only 3 shots were heard. All 3 bullets came from Oswald's rifle from his perch at the 6th floor window.
Gun shot wound experts say the head wound was caused by a bullet coming from behind. The blast from his front right skull was the exit wound. That shot did not come from the grassy knoll.
Wecht knew full well he was telling blatant lies, he was only interested in lining his pockets as a conspiracy theorist.
The twisted Cyril... He needs to be famous. It's rather disgusting to see this old man behave this way.
late great should have stated gun originally found HP German 7.65 just for ignorant which Wally Concretely mentioned for first two days
You have any idea how much chaos and confusion was going on that day?
Cops freely admitted to initially misidentifying the unfamiliar Carcano at first, big deal, but of course, for conspiracy theorists, the idea some police could have made an honest mistake is impossible to believe, it's much more likely and probable that somebody safely approached every cop to enter the building and persuaded them all to bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason after their ace hit man happily left the wrong kind of rifle, or multiple rifles, lying around the crime scene for an army of police and FBI agents to swiftly find.
U S Mexico boarder security programs existed back then?
The things about human trafficking is really real they most go get Small kids, they screen the woman. Most probably that's why JFK wife is still alive.
How they perfectly missed her huge smiles
Never trust a beautiful Lady. When thing's like this goes down. She's questionable to me
As for what became of the Magic Bullet, a bullet was found on Connolly's stretcher at Parkland Hospital and it was matched to "Oswald's" rifle. The bullet was slightly flattened at the rear where the power charge had pushed it forward, and it was otherwise nearly pristine. It had lost only a tiny fraction of the grains of weight than were found in Connolly's body.
That bullet was never fired from a gun.
@@grandadmiralahab9085 Either it was never fired from a gun or it was fired into cotton wadding. The "Magic Bullet" excuse was moot anyway; and so is the question of whether the shooter could have accurately fired three shots in rapid succession. The first shot hit a tree branch and glanced off the rim of a traffic light. Another bullet hit a curb near the triple overpass, causing a chip of concrete to hit a witness on the cheek. Of the alleged three bullets, that leaves only one bullet to do all the damage that three bullets were alleged to have done. Multiple shooters, anyone?
@@AmericanActionReport Even fired through a ton of cotton wadding the bullet would be distorted.
Mass increases with velocity. This works both ways when considering what the mass is impacting.
"Science" is a thing.
@@grandadmiralahab9085 Mass is unchanged by velocity.
@@jimbrown9817 Tell that to Einstein. His words, not mine.
All of the fragments recovered from the limousine could NOT be matched to two bullets!
All bullets and fragments every were matched to Oswald's rifle, the stretcher bullet included.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
@@aaronz7056 not true.
Many fragments were not tested.
Over 50% of witnesses in Dealey Plaza said shots came from the railroad yards.
Stop disinforming.
@@aaronz7056 what about the fragments left in Connally's body, which Connally and his family REFUSED to have extracted post-mortem???
@@dphinman6952 Crackpot rubbish.
What did I literally just say above?
Most credible witnesses heard 3 shots total.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds with several seconds between each.
Victims' reactions, 1-2 frames apart, clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet.
Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right, the victims' wounds demonstrably lining upon a trajectory and tracking straight back to the sixth floor window.
The purpose of these things isn't to convince people that " my crazy magic bullet theory " is true, but to say if you think my crazy theory is wrong then there must have been a second shooter!
Wecht blatantly lies about the bullet's condition and about the positions of the victims during the shooting, it's a bit hard to afford him much credibility.
@@aaronz7056Are you a medical professional who has specific training autopsy if not shut up because your displaying your ignorance
@@aaronz7056I used to think highly of him, but I now have him in my “kook” file.
@@aaronz7056 Explain how the round entered his back to the right of his spine and then went up and exited through the neck on a downward trajectory?
This should be good........
@@laurad2442 Possibly because as any idiot can plainly see the limo was demonstrably travelling on a downhill grade from the plaza. How about YOU explain away ALL of the following:
a) All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
b) Stretcher bullet was also matched to Oswald's rifle.
c) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo from behind.
d) As Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his shoulder is driven down, his hat flips up and his expression violently contorts between frames from the blow. One bullet, and ergo, from behind.
e) Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard, and turned sharply to his right.
f) Wecht, on the other hand, demonstrably stages recreations of the shooting using two actors seated bolt upright at the same height, facing forward, knowing full well that's B.S.
g) Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window.
h) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been demonstrably blocked by Kennedy's body, the same bullet has to have gone through both of them, and ergo through Kennedy's back and throat wounds.
i) Bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side.
j) Nobody planting a bogus bullet at the hospital within one hour of the shooting could possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot.
k) Witnesses a few feet directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
l) No witnesses ever heard or saw any gunman firing from any other window in the TSBD or any other building.
This should be even more good...
Uhhh, no, not right. We must have watched two different Zapruder films. If Connally is holding his Stetson hat up as high as you say, why do I see his jacket and not the hat when they come out from behind the sign? That was a big hat he had that day. I shouldn't even be able to see his face if what you say is true. Come on dude. Not a minute into this and you're already bullshiiiin' me. This guy is full of it if he thinks I'm too stupid to believe my own eyes. That's called gaslighting, and this guy might be pretty good at it.
He's just giving people the general idea to show how nonsensical the magic bullet idea is. Not giving you a mm accurate representation ready for Scientific American!
Sounds pretty specific to me, not a generalization. I'm old enough to see through BS and gaslighting. The hat is in the governor's lap the whole time.
The reason that JFK was assassinated is common knowledge and so is the identity of the Agency involved, I find it incredible that people are still debating the event.
Would you like to share with me that reason and which agency just to see if it matches with mine .
From my research it was a mysterious group known as the secret team and the reason was because JFK didn't want outside interference in running American politics .
I find it incredible too: after 60 years all credible evidence still points directly at Oswald.
@@aaronz7056 Typical bot reply.
@@geoffdrew5207 No I just find value in alerting the unwary when they are being misled by crackpots so paranoid they assume anybody not on board for this silly conspiracy crap must be a "bot." lol
@@aaronz7056 If you are not a bot then you either work for a government agency or you have the interpretive powers of a mushroom.
You can clearly see in the video jfk and John were shot at the exact same time. They both throw up their hands in pain at the EXACT same time.
Into the neck and out the back shot from the front probably through the windshield.
No bullets or fragments were ever found that did not match to Oswald's rifle.
The throat wound has to be an exit wound: the view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been blocked by Kennedy's body and the bullet has to have gone through him first.
Let me get this straight: somebody was assuming they would frame this on a lone shooter from behind while standing squarely in front of the limo (where, exactly?), firing through glass and past the ears of a carful of passengers, and shooting Kennedy in the face....
@@aaronz7056 Yes exactly _
"Into the neck and out the back shot from the front probably through the windshield. " as stated✔✔✔
@@hj179 Let me restate:
a) no bullets or fragments were ever found that didn't match to Oswald's rifle
b) as victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up and his expression violently contorts between frames from a blow
c) victims' wounds line up on a perfect trajectory, and for that matter straight back to the sixth floor window
d) the view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him before going through Connally
d) stretcher bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle
e) bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side
f) if the stretcher bullet is a planted fake, it was planted by somebody who could not possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot
g) there was no possibly vantage point from which any shooter could have been standing unseen from which he could have fired through the windshield (much less without hitting anybody else in the car) and getting Kennedy in the throat, and anybody firing through that windshield would never assume in a million years they would be able to frame this on Oswald...
"a) no bullets or fragments were ever found that didn't match to Oswald's rifle2 "@@aaronz7056
but of course Aaron omits to mention that MANY FRAGMENTS could not be NAA tested . he further omits to mention that the NAA test that was conducted on some fragments is now regarded as seriously flawed . and even further to that Aaron omits to mention that officially one shot missed and was never found .in addition witnesses have bullets either causing a fresh furrow in the grass , striking down by the manhole causing dust or concrete to fly up , and a witness said a shot struck the street behind the limo and caused sparks to fly up .
" as victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames" Aaron
its funny then that Aarons bible the warren commission said that there was atleast 1.5 seconds between both mens reactions .so much so that the commission had to ask connallys surgeon dr shaw could connally have had a DELAYED REACTION .to which he replied NO , NOT WITH THE SERIOUS WOUNDS HE HAD .so zapruders camera filmed at about 18.5 frames per second , so that is mean there is a gap of about 27 frames between both men reacting NOT THE 1 TO 2 FRAMES he claims . but Aaron knows all this , i already pointed out all this to him . but that wont stop him re posting what he knows is not true .
"c) victims' wounds line up on a perfect trajectory, and for that matter straight back to the sixth floor window" Aaron
what Aaron fails to mention here is that the trajectory he speaks of (from the warren commission ) has a bullet hitting jfk on the RIGHT OF THE NECK , above shoulder level . and the autopsy photos show the bullet wound irrefutably several inches lower down ON THE BACK and BELOW shoulder level just right of the spine .so if the obvious is not obvious Aarons trajectory is not only wrong but based on a provable LIE . but none of that will stop Aaron continually saying the TRAJECTORY IS PERFECT .
"d) the view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him before going through Connally" Aaron
this nonsense ASSUMES that any shooter was IN A straight and DIRECT line right behind jfk . and sat or kneeling so as to be about the same height in the limo as jfk . there are several problems here . oswald was supposed to be 6 FLOORS ABOVE JFK . second elm street curves left to right and film and photo shows the angle of the limo and the men in it at certain times during the shooting sequence . i will give a good example . i have been told that connally would have blocked any shot to jfk from the knoll . yet willis photo shows jfk and the knoll above and to his front and right , and shows a clear unobstructed view from the knoll to jfk . if oswald was the shooter he had to be sat not only 6 floors above jfk but also off to the right rear of the limo . the secret service OWN recreation photos and film show a white chalk mark on the jfk standin and the connally standin is seen quite clear , all from the 6th floor window . surely Aaron has seen these stills ? .
"e) bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side" Aaron
not according to expert medical witness testimony of which all but one dr said that ce399 the bullet in question could not have smashed connallys wrist . so again even the warren commission disputes Aaron .
"f) if the stretcher bullet is a planted fake, it was planted by somebody who could not possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot" Aaron
the problem here is that ce399 was never planted at parkland . 3 men saw the bullet that day and two of them (both experienced hunters and one was a former cop ) said the bullet they saw was POINTED TIPPED . the bullet in evidence is round nosed all most flat .
g as usual involves much speculation on Aarons part . speculation is akin to theory , and is not proof .
@@aaronz7056 @Aaron Z Yes exactly _
"Into the neck and out the back shot from the front probably through the windshield. " as stated✔✔✔ and there were two men dressed as cops on the underpass.
Cyril Wecht is a passionate Dr who has been involved in the assassination since it happened and he is not a nut and anyone who doesn’t care about the truth of that day has no right to bitch about the mess we are in today.
I don’t know if Oswald did it or if sponge Bob did it I just look at the two bullets I’ll give you the BS story on CE-399,run with it but before you do look at the third bullet the 6.5 carcano bullet was a full metal jacket but the head shot was a hollow point and shattered on impact and from the official X-rays you can easily see forty two shards from the bullet and was never found or is in evidence meaning two different bullets from two different weapons means two shooters=Conspiracy!
No, he’s disingenuous. He knows the seating arrangement in the limo completely debunks his “magic bullet”, but he persists in spreading the lie.
The crux of the issue is that there are two Cyril Wechts. First, there is Wecht the reputable forensic pathologist. Then there is Wecht the assassination buff. The first Wecht usually comes to conclusions very close to (if not identical to) those of other reputable forensic pathologists. The second Wecht repeats assassination factoids and bogus trajectory analysis.
Unless you hold your beliefs about the JFK assassination in a manner akin to religious beliefs (evidence and facts don't matter) what he's saying makes sense. One bullet did not travel through two men, striking bone and tissue, and emerge missing three grains of metal. In fact, there was considerably more metal found in Connally's body alone than was missing from the "magic bullet". That's true. What's the old line, "You can have your own opinions but you can't have your own facts"? And the final, formal investigation done into the assassination of JFK, in 1978, concluded that probably at least four shots were fired and there was a conspiracy to kill JFK - that was what the government concluded.
Does anyone understand that for Kennedys wound in the back to go upward like Wecht is saying, he had have been shot by some either laying on the truck of the car or laying on the ground close behind the car and then shot through the trunk. The car was going downhill.
Tn the presidents back in the autopsy files is really high on the shoulder, right beside the bottom of the neck. The autopsy says it went in beside C3. The drawing is a pretty bad one, because it does look like the bullet went in at about C7 or T1. The problem is if the drawing is right. That bullet is coming out of JFKs chest. High powered rifle, there would be and exit wound and that bullet is still moving. Thats why it hit Connally. Wecht never explains where the bullet went if it didn't hit Connally.
Dr Burkley verified the back wound at T3. Dr Ebersole placed it to the right of T4.
@@81overon Yes, it is clearly visible between the T3-T4 vertebrae and off to the right near the middle trapezius. With the downward trajectory, it would have exited out the chest near the area of the manubrium or top of the sternum.
We all know the magic bullet story is all steamy horse manure
We all know it makes perfect sense and is backed up by evidence.
Perfect sense to whom
Some of the best shooters in the country attempted to do what Oswald allegedly did and could not pull it off.
The entire assaniation was completed by a select group of agents and the majic bullet was part of the scheme.
Im a retired policeman and in 39 years never saw a projectile do as many things and with no damage to it.
One has to look at all of the evidence with an open mind.
@@robertchristianson1187 That's right, "the best shooters in the country" couldn't pull off 3 shots over 8-9 seconds (as victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate) at a slow-moving target a maximum of 88 yards away. Where do people read this crackpot rubbish?
@@robertchristianson1187 How's this for looking at the evidence with an "open mind?"
A) As the victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up, his shoulder is driven down and his expression violently contorts between frames from a blow. One bullet.
B) Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right, the wounds all lining up on a perfect trajectory.
C) The view of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through Kennedy first.
D) The bullet recovered from the stretcher is in a condition EXACTLY consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrates.
E) If that bullet was a planted fake, the person planting it could not possibly have known:
- a bullet needed planting at all
- he would not simply get caught in that emergency ward with agents, cops and officials all over the place
- exactly where to plant it where it would be plausibly tied to Connally
- the "real bullet" wasn't still in Connally's leg, as even his doctors erroneously thought at first
- he wasn't simply planting one bullet into evidence and blowing the whole plot
F) Witnesses under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
G) Multiple and mathematically precise computer recreations by different investigators over the years have consistently demonstrated the wounds all track on a straight line directly back to that window.
H) There is no evidence for a "select group of agents." Zero.
Once he looks at how everyone in the car was seated, this whole argument goes down the toilet. They didn't sit directly behind each other, or on the same plane. Sorry.
Wecht knew full well he was blatantly lying, he only cared about lining his pockets as a conspiracy grifter.
So his way of disproving the single bullet theory is to take 2 random people who aren't the same size or body type as either Kennedy or Connolly, and sit them in chairs directly behind each other, facing the exact same way, when even the most rudimentary knowledge of the case would tell you they weren't in that position at all. Connolly was in a jump seat, which placed him below and slightly to the left of Kennedy. The Zapruder film shows that Connolly was turning before the shot hit Kennedy's neck (either waving at the crowd or because he heard a first shot that had missed). You can also see that he's still turned when Kennedy is hit. If you put the volunteers in those positions the path of the bullet lines up perfectly.
Connally was still turned when JFK was hit? Was Connally turned when he was hit - or was he facing straight ahead?
Problem is, the back wound had no exit, per Dr. Humes.
@@jimbrown9817 View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him first.
@@81overon Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right, the wounds all lining up on a perfect trajectory.
@@aaronz7056 Nonsense. Look at JCc wounds. Straight line. If he was hit turned sharply to his right the bullet would have exited the middle of his chest.
Case closed, people.
Mythbusters managed to model the shot perfectly. It is a very possible shot.
Shots plural, at least three.
RFK Jr said it was C!@/Military Industrial Complex.
"RFK Jr. said..." lol
Wecht has been proven wrong so many times on this issue, Michael Baden and Vincent Bugliosi for two it is hard to believe he’s still spouting this nonsense. Bugliosi’s book Reclaiming History proves irrefutably that Wecht is positively wrong on this issue
There were several shooters at various positions. That's why there are many inconsistencies with the crime scene. What the doc is saying is what most of the experts have been saying since that day
@@rlsiler8663 Their was 1 shooter period any other theory is pure nonsense
The magic bullet theory is just that, a theory. It was only created months after the autopsy. It was needed when the story of the missed bullet became known. The bullet path through JFK was never traced, it was assumed. The WC provided exhibits that "proved" the theory. Which exhibit do you feel best describes theory. The diagram that that shows the bullet striking JFL in the back, moving up to exit the throat, then moving down to strike JC, moving up to strike the wrist, then deflecting down to enter the thigh. The photo exhibit shows the bullet striking JFK in the back, exiting his CHEST and then striking JC. Which WC exhibit best represents the theory for you? The diagram with changing bullet angles and direction or the photo that has the bullet exiting JFK's chest? They both can't be right.
@@garybrewster5657It doesn't matter if Wecht is correct or not. The fact of the matter is that this was a coup d'etat. At least 6shots from at least 3 shooters. Read all you can about it and you'll see it. I realize that it's unsettling to find out that factions of our own government did this. Then covered it up. But it's the truth. Lee's sole contribution to JFK's assassination was to be blamed for it.
cyril wecht has been for his entire career this nations pre-eminent forensic pathologist , the "nonsense " you refer to is a nobody like you sniping at the heels of someone as accomplished as dr. wecht !
Best one for me is LHOs alleged shooting of JD. Tippit, LHO had on him a revolver, They found shell casings at the scene that matched LHOs revolver, NOW, 1st up, LHO would have to have been THEE dumbest MOFO on earth EVER to shoot a cop then stand there and empty the shells out of his revolver, OR 2nd up he had the worlds first and ONLY revolver that ejects shells, And I don't think Ex-marines/would be assassins would leave shells at a scene regardless of whatever gun they were using (Same as with the shells in the book depository) Lee may have been involved in JFK assassination but I don't think he killed him, he certainly didn't shoot Tippit (PS, Jack Ruby went for an X-ray and they told him to "wait here" flipped the X-ray on and blasted him with radiation, Cancer chewed him up in no time) Thanks for listening, PS I'm available for weddings, funerals or bar mitzvahs.
While I agree on the revolver issue he could have done a partial reload to keep 6 live rounds in the cylinder. I wouldnt walk around with a half empty weapon when I could reload.
@@charlespratt8663 Tippit wasn't shot 6 times though
@@snelgrave101 Not only that but the revolver had been bored out. So everytime the gun was fired, it left different and inconsistent marks on the bullets, meaning that they could not narrow it down to that revolver exclusively. Also, when the casings were found by a witness and handed them to an officer they both initialed the casings. One officer also radioed them in (can't remember if it was the same officer) and said that casings were found from a .38 auto. Not only were the casings in evidence from a .38 special but they didn't have any of the initials on them, so no chain of custody.
And adding to what you said, in a time when you could buy a revolver from practically anywhere without a trail, why would you mail order one leaving a paper trail, and then deliberately leave the shells at the scene? lol
@@chickenfist1554 So the patsy could be in place.
Witnesses saw him shake the casings out of the revolver and drop them near the scene after the shooting. Not so hard to understand really.
When the “facts” absolutely positively NEED to match the evidence 😂 (but they don’t)
for some reason I don't believe the CIA, FBI, SS, or any gov't agency....and it's getting worse by the day
The chairs are not at correct height. Back seat was higher and offset from front seat.. front seat was jump seat. not saying the MB theory is correct, but this makes a big difference when you line up seats correction. and Wecht knows this, but he is being cute in the video. there is no zig zag line when you line up the seats correctly.
Chairs are in the wrong position and the wrong height. JFK was sitting higher than the Governor and the Gov. sat more inward , he was not sitting directly in front of JFK.
The hospital diagram was also incorrect , the bullet hit JFK higher up in the back (almost the neck).
It was a straight line , there was no turning of the bullet , no magical. It only deflected after it hit Connelly's wrist , then it changed it's direction and landed in his thigh and it was not in "pristine" condition as some say.
One bullet did in fact go through 2 people from the school book depository building 6th floor.
The headshot on the other hand , that's another gun with a different kind of bullet from the right front (grassy knoll).
Wow
JFK was not sitting higher, or if he was, it was an inch or two at the most. JFK was taller than Connelly by about 4 inches -- JFK was 5'11" and Connelly was 5'7", maybe 5'8". If you look closely at pics that day, you'll see both men having their arms on the side of the limo at various points, and JFK's seat is not at the door like Connelly's is, and the door is a little further out than the edge of where JFK is by a few inches (3-4 maybe). The idea that he isn't directly in front of him is a myth cooked up by Warren Commission apologists to make the magic bullet "theory" plausible. Even if he's not, the distance, is negligible. Putting someone in a chair directly in front of someone else is perfectly fine for demonstration purposes. Changing the distances to support what those that argue were in allegedly place in the limo would not change the outcome of the analysis Wecht presented here. Its a red herring at best and dishonest at worst.
@@scott1564 Connelly's seat (these were custom seats added to the limo , they are not factory from Lincoln) is much lower than the rear seats in the limo. Plus as you put it JFK is taller than Connelly which accounts for the trajectory in the ballistics. Out JFK's throat and into Connelly's back.
I’ve been to Daley plaza. The book depository shot was easy. The shot from the gassy knoll was not possible.
@@angeloftheabyss5265 witnesses that were there on that day that saw and smelled the gunsmoke would disagree with your forensic theory.
Military called it the rifle that hurt nobody let alone killed anyone.
Swell, pity all bullets and fragments ever found were matched to it and the shooting was successfully recreated by investigators using it.
@@aaronz7056 Fragments. Do you seriously believe the NAA results?
@@jimbrown9817 No of course not, I think it's much more likely some conspiracy knew it could safely approach scores and scores of police, FBI, Secret Service, ballistics experts, photographers, x-ray technicians, doctors, witnesses, whole commissions, etc. and persuade them all to obey illegal orders to falsify evidence, commit perjury by the dozen, and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason.
I owned one. You couldn't hit the wall of a room standing inside the room.
Here’s the real answer: The actual bullet that traveled through Kennedy and Connally pretty much disintegrated. There were still fragments in Connally when he died. But The Commission needed some kind of visual evidence to support their single-bullet theory, so they took one of the test-fired bullets from the FBI lab, that was only slightly damaged, and decided that was close enough to be called the “magic bullet”. Exhibit 399 did not hit anyone that day. It might have passed through a cadaver’s wrist several weeks/months later during a test firing.
It's easier than that. JFK's back wound was only 5cm deep lol
How did they know they needed to plant a bullet? And why would they plant a bullet that looked like CE399? Why would they want to fight that battle?
Why wouldn’t they have fired a test round and use fragments, or a more heavily damaged version? They didn’t even know the Zapruder film existed or what it showed until well after Parkland where CE399 was found.
It’s just nonsense, just absolute rubbish.
@@chickenfist1554That’s untrue as well. They didn’t probe the wound all the way through, although it would have been helpful.
@@jetcat132 The bullet found on the stretcher was not necessarily the same one that was finally submitted as #399. It was only after the Commission realized they needed to sell the single bullet theory that this magic bullet emerged.
@@jetcat132 Humes probed it with his little finger and felt the 'end'. Magic bullet denied, conspiracy confirmed.
The SBT theory cannot be disproved, simply because the exact parameters are unknown and the possible variants exceed "calculability".
The SBT theory seems implausible, particularly in view of the slight deformation of the bullet. But, "implausible" is not the same as "impossible".
There are other possible anomalies and occurances that now can only be studied in the "trusted" films (if indeed anything can be trusted).
Only an utterly incongruous, perhaps irrational observation of a supposedly normal object or person can lead to major suspicion.
I will point to the Zapruder film. Before frame 300, visible panning into the sprocket hole area, is the Babushka lady. The "camera" she holds up to her face lights up like a car headlight. It is not a flash bulb, because that only last less than a frame, and Kodachrome, unlike video, has no latency. The bright light lasts for several frames, possibly continues beyond the film area. Such a light emitting from a "camera" must be artificially placed inside or on the camera. It is a clear signal. Why send signals to the opposite side of Elm Street?
Other signals appear to be sent. "Apron Man" marks the commencement of the operation, "Umbrella man" marks beginning of the ideal "kill zone", "Dark Complected Man" sends a walkie talkie "squelch as a signal to three shooter teams. "Babushka Lady" signals to the main shooter in the Eastern end of the Elm Street Pergola, one second before the head shot.
Seen a 90 year old man do those shots faster than the real shots
Where he fired those bullets, in air?
The gun is NOT considered inferior by "every gun expert". He also ignores the fact that the back seat sat a few inches higher than the Connelly's seat.
it,s worse than inferior ,it,s like an alfa romeo from the seventys.
No, but it was considered inferior by the Italian army lol
His statement "I'm a Democrat" didn't age well.
Not in these days. Hard to believe he admitted it
@@michaelmiller6848 One moronic comment in reply to another moronic comment, dumfk and dumberfk, great stuff!
At least it’s not part of the magat infestation we have these days
most Jews are loyal democrats
Connaly was hit from the side to align the wrist and thigh wounds,hit in the back from another shot from behind in another building.shots were coming from every where.Oswald was in the break room drinking a coke.
So, I guess the bullet that hit JFK disappeared into thin air after exiting his body unlike the bullet found in Connally that must have zipped around JFK's body to hit Connally.
They were run through by the same bullet.
As the victims come into view from behind the sign and Kennedy is hit, within 1-2 frames Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up and his expression violently contorts from a blow. One bullet.
Connally was seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right, the victims' wounds all lining up on a perfect trajectory.
View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been completely blocked by Kennedy's body, the bullet has to have gone through him first.
Bullet recovered from Connally's stretcher was matched to Oswald's rifle.
That bullet is in a condition perfectly consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, as it would have done, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence demonstrates: badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side.
If that bullet was a planted fake it was planted by somebody who could not possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole conspiracy.
@@aaronz7056 , agree. I was being sarcastic. These conspiracy theorists never explain how these fourth and fifth bullets hit their targets and then disappear after hitting them. It obvious that after the bullet hit JFK it then traveled into Connally.
@@aaronz7056 Well said. Why is it a surprise that a bullet that went thru Kennedy and didn't hit bone would end up hitting Connally. Why would someone plant a bullet if Connally should already have a bullet in him? People have been misrepresenting the path of this bullet for decades by using false inputs.
@@aaronz7056dude you try way to hard to be anything but a paid disinformation specialist. Lengthy posts full of inaccuracies on EVERY JFK assassination video are a dead giveaway.
@@aaronz7056 Governor John Connally's account of the assassination shows that the single bullet theory is false if you compare it with the Zapruder film. This is something that I really only noticed recently. Connally said that when he heard the first shot, he turned to the right to see where the shot came from. He stated that when he was turning back to the left, facing forward, he felt an impact to his back, throwing him forward. He noticed he was covered with blood and realized he had been shot. His wife then pulls him down into her lap. Seems straight forward, and everything. At least that's what I always assumed. I figured the shot through Kennedy's back and through his throat entered Connally's back, exited his chest, hit his thigh, and wrist. Ok, sounds reasonable I guess, right? I never thought anything of it, until I actually compared Connally's account with the Zapruder film itself. This is where it gets interesting. The Zapruder film shows that Kennedy was shot in the back BEFORE Connally turned to the right. Connaly, according to his own account hadn't been shot yet, but Kennedy is hunched forward clutching his neck. Therefore, that shot DIDN'T hit Connally. So where did the bullet that exited Kennedy's neck go? If you watch the Zapruder film, at the moment Kennedy reacts to the throat wound, Connally's jacket collar flap seems to flip up. Perhaps the bullet exited Kennedy's throat, passed through Connally's jacket collar flap and either ended up in a car seat back or perhaps the front windshield of the car. Some witnesses claim they saw a bullet hole in the windshield. The bullet could have then struck the curb by the overpass. Now Connaly turns to his left, which is the moment he claimed he felt the shot to his back. He states he felt something like a fist slamming into his back, which threw him forward. When you look at the Zapruder film, this happens at the exact instant that Kennedy is shot in the head, not in his back. Could the bullet that hit Kennedy in the head be the one that also hit Connally? I don't know. The bullet trajectory doesn't seem to line up. But Connally was definitely shot at the same time as Kennedy's head shot. No doubt about it. Therefore, the single bullet theory is definitely false. Do your own comparison and you will see what I mean.
welty, is still around? time to switch to the alamo or something
the magic bullet theory was debunked long ago. attention is one hell of a drug
Theory makes perfect sense and is backed up by evidence.
The "magic" bullet makes sense if you research the seating positions of the 2 men and consider Connelly had turned around in his seat to see what was happening after the 1st shot. It does line up with only a minor deflection when it hit Connellys wrist.
I thought so too. It's so simple that it's too simple to accept. The Zapruder film (stabilized & enhanced version) you can see they get hit at the exact same time. It's alarming how vulnerable JFK was, and how there wasn't enforced protocol with dealing with crime scenes, evidence, autopsy pictures... not allowing 30 people in one operating room. Seems a lot of this would never fly today, and that day changed so much it's intense. Also, in the Zapruder film just before the headshot you can see all 6 occupants of the car move in synchronization, indicating the driver tapped the breaks for a second. Probably confused from the shots but in my opinion seemed untrained to just hit the gas at the sound of anything that sounded like a gunshot.
@@robberezowski68 There's a video titled "The Zapruder Film Mystery" which is very interesting. If the info in that video is accurate then it means the Zapruder film was altered and we can't really trust our eyes. For example, look closely at the back of JFK's head, it doesn't get blown out as described by the Parklands doctors. There's a bright spot on his temple, almost like a tracer round. The back of his head seems to be blacked out in the critical frames to hide the damage because it contradicts the official story.
@@misterG2006 The Zapruder film was 100% altered. Zapruder himself even said so. He likely was hit in the back of the head but the final kill shot came from the front right milliseconds afterwards. The magic bullet was complete bs though. The back wound only goes in about 2" for starters.
Gerald Ford admitted to moving the back wound for the good of the country 😂 The reason people believe the Lonespiracy magic bullet crap is because they're scared of the implications of multiple shooters and the CIA involvement. But don't worry America, Allen Dulles investigated and found no CIA involvement 😂
@@robberezowski68 How do you accept the fact that the round entered his back just to the right of his spine on a downward trajectory and then somehow exited above the entrance wound and towards the left through the throat? How is that even possible? Even if that could have legitimately happened, then the round would have had to have exited upward from the neck and out of the vehicle.
This guy is full of crap...there was nothing unusual about that bullet going through both people..after going through the neck it tumbled down into Connally's back......then lost its energy and hit the wrist.......big deal.....
No bullet holes in neck except anterior, below larynx.
The pro-conspiracy camp holds that the magic bullet of the assassin not Oswald, is evident simply by its absence. _Datsa soma compelling argument dare_ .
It's pathetic to see how he continues to grossly misrepresent this issue.
He doesn't care as long as he can keep cashing in.
Stick to the point.
It doesn't matter which magazine, how illustrious it is or how they obtained the film, you studied it. Likewise, it doesnt matter who your friends were or if and when you supported any political adventure.
8 minutes could have been said in one.
Go back to sleep Princess, you’re not fit to tie this man’s shoes.
I disagree.. I believe he was shot from behind by a secret service man whose gun discharged
There's no evidence to support that nonsense.
What are the chances that that shot hit him square in the head? That would be the most unfortunate thing ever.
Ridiculous.
Flatly contradicted by film, eyewitness, ballistic and medical evidence.
It was the secret service driver that killed him with his poor driving skills and just plain taking his foot off the gas.
Wecht got the trajectory wrong.
He knew he was lying, he didn't care, he was a grifter.
I once killed seven deer with one bullet. Magic it was.
por favor
Read
If it was OSwald he shoot at who he thought was LBJ. JFK was shot from the front. Thanks to the Zapruder film
With all the witnesses and cops how could gunman get away
………..THAT is one magic loogie
The seating positions are inaccurate in the demonstration. Gov. Connally was sitting in the right side jump seat, not the front seat of the car. The jump seats are several inches INBOARD of the backseat positions where JFK and Mrs. Kennedy were sitting. (if you doubt this, simply find a picture of the Presidential limousine) So Connally was sitting several inches inboard of President Kennedy. The "Magic Bullet Theory" is not magical at all and the bullet trajectory makes a lot more sense when you consider the actual seating positions of the two men. In fact, this has been brought up several times before but there are still many people out there who don't seem to know.
I do not doubt there was a conspiracy to kill the President. I believe it's highly possible there were even multiple shooters that day. But, I do think we need to be as accurate as possible with our claims. The "Magic Bullet Theory" itself is NOT accurate.
According to the limo specs, the jump seats are 2.5 inches from the door.
There are so many errors in this guys analysis. If you know the facts, and the exact flight path and how they were specifically seated. It is a single bullet fact.
Where did that bullet enter JFK?
You forgot Connolly was sitting in a swivel seat and was turned almost 90 degrees to the right.
Swivel seat? Connally was turned almost 90 degrees to the right? Did you read his testimony?
@@81overon Did you watch the film?
@@rc4688 There were no swivel seats. If you look up Lincoln X100 you’ll find photos of its interior as well as exterior.
@@rc4688 I've seen the film. Connally was facing forward. This is his testimony:
"About the time I turned back where I was facing more or less straight ahead, the way the car was moving, I was hit."
He didn't forget, he just lied.
Dorothy kilgallen. / Judy garland.
Dorothy is part of ,
An Os shooting.
Magical trajectories are references to Os and Oz .
Ever watch real life events follow a movie ?
Judy garland arrived in Hyannis port .
Her home is in Hyannis port.
After she arrives , she is greeted by the emerald king of hearts ♥️.. John Kennedy.
This is the beginning of his end .
Walter Disney’s end .
Oswald is the rabbit smuggler who was one of David ferries fairy’s..
I bet that guy is hard to live with.
First hit, JFK throat (frontal).
Second hit, JFK back (rear).
Third hit, JC (rear). One bullet caused all JC wounds as he held stetson close to chest while turning right to see JFK.
Fourth hit, JFK head shot (frontal).
Bullet found in stretcher was planted, not from any wound.
Two more shots may have missed (see Buddy Walthers bullet and James Tague wound/curb).
Thank god someone gets it. I was beginning to lose hope!
First shot : not in zapruder film/must be around the time that they turn to elm street.shot missed, but hit a guy (minor injury) in crowd that was watchin the president go by ...
Second shot: hit kenedy and governor
Third shot: jfk head shoot .
rip JFK
@@RDX1981 Where about's did the second shot hit JFK?
A military weapons specialist was given the same kind of rifle and was asked to fire the same number of rounds at the same speed and was able to do it but without the accuracy needed to hit a moving target. Far too many holes need to be filled, I doubt that it will ever be told.