Thank you for this video - i like functional programming in theory, but struggle with the obtuse terms. True to form, they tend to be recursively obtuse in their definitions (... a monad is a monoid in the category of an endofunctor...). You're one of the only FP evangelists i've seen who doesn't assume a pre-enlightened audience. 👍 You're doing great work
Strictly speaking a monoid is not the actual operation but whole frame. The set of all lists with the append operation and the empty list as the identity element is a monoid.
Thank you for this video - i like functional programming in theory, but struggle with the obtuse terms. True to form, they tend to be recursively obtuse in their definitions (... a monad is a monoid in the category of an endofunctor...). You're one of the only FP evangelists i've seen who doesn't assume a pre-enlightened audience. 👍 You're doing great work
recursively obtuse, I like that term
Strictly speaking a monoid is not the actual operation but whole frame. The set of all lists with the append operation and the empty list as the identity element is a monoid.
This is the best video on monoid 😎
Thanks!
It’s a good video bruh
"monoids kick monads' butt" :facepalm:. Does true kick false's butt? Does 42 kick 41's butt? Is > greater-than