How Will The World's NEWEST Nuclear Icebreaker Work?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2024

Комментарии •

  • @ch4.hayabusa
    @ch4.hayabusa Год назад +187

    Japan: We don't want ☢️ power, lets buy LNG instead
    Russia: Nuclear powered delivery of LNG for Tanaka, sign here

    • @MaximGhost
      @MaximGhost 2 месяца назад +7

      Only 3.6 roentgens. Not great, not terrible.

    • @Arsenic71
      @Arsenic71 Месяц назад +4

      @@MaximGhost RBMK reactors don't explode.

    • @itsbxrd5220
      @itsbxrd5220 Месяц назад +1

      @@MaximGhost it's not 3 roentgen... It's 15,000.

    • @79adventures
      @79adventures 9 дней назад +1

      @@Arsenic71 ofc they don't they simply melt elephants

    • @superyamagucci
      @superyamagucci День назад

      @@Arsenic71 :…don’t explode.
      Russia: Hold my vodka

  • @charlesblithfield6182
    @charlesblithfield6182 Месяц назад +13

    Cool ship. I like how crew comfort is a priority. Commerce is obviously a prime reason that there are substantial resources being put into this project but military applications and Arctic sovereignty are in the mix as well.

  • @clintstinkeye5607
    @clintstinkeye5607 Год назад +73

    I'm not a hater of people that populate countries that have political issues with my United States.
    If Russia did something that worked better than ours I'm not feeling any hate.
    This elevates the standards and that isn't bad in my mind.
    Some competitions actually help more people than they hurt.

    • @dataman6744
      @dataman6744 Год назад +20

      "worked better"?? I don't think the US is anywhere near the Russians when it come to ice breakers, no one is

    • @nettlecarrier8259
      @nettlecarrier8259 8 месяцев назад

      Fun fact: Russia has no political issues with USA, it's the USA who has political issues with Russia. In the 90's Russia wanted to become allies with USA and in 2000s Putin proposed that Russia join NATO, but U.S. only wanted Russia as a gas station not partner, so they went on with their "containment policy" against Russia. That's what brings us where we are now. I mean, who on Earth would love being "contained"?

    • @simonmackie4924
      @simonmackie4924 4 месяца назад +2

      Funny saying a country that political issues with your country the US.

    • @MrNebelschatten
      @MrNebelschatten 3 месяца назад +2

      clint here is indeed not from "his" United States but a Russian trying to claim that Americans are impressed with his countries achievements. Talking of having low self esteem Russia has patterns of overpromising and underdelivering.

    • @joshbobst1629
      @joshbobst1629 3 месяца назад

      ​@@MrNebelschattenBut I am a u s citizen, and I am impressed with russia's achievements. History's fastest growing economy and no homelessness under the Soviets, and now putin has somehow managed to bring the country out from under the united states' plan for it: to be a third world resource mine. Russia is not my enemy, I don't know why the morons who run my country think it's theirs.

  • @astecheee1519
    @astecheee1519 Год назад +117

    "2 Soccer fields long and the height of a multi-story building". With measurements this vague, who needs lies?

    • @dallysinghson5569
      @dallysinghson5569 Год назад +27

      American freedom units.

    • @maksimer6612
      @maksimer6612 10 месяцев назад +7

      Помереишь когда построим 👌!

    • @zukacs
      @zukacs 4 месяца назад +6

      They said 650f

    • @northwind4362
      @northwind4362 4 месяца назад +11

      Displacement 69,700 tonnes (68,600 long tons)
      Length 209 m (686 ft)
      Beam 47.7 m (156 ft)
      Draft 13 m (43 ft)
      Depth 20.3 m (67 ft)

    • @azi6477
      @azi6477 3 месяца назад +9

      Yup, but the creators from this item even translated metric back to the antique and stupid imperial system that the Americans are still holding on to.

  • @firstnamelastnameisallowed7943
    @firstnamelastnameisallowed7943 3 месяца назад +17

    If it is built the same way they are planning it then that will be some incredible ships!! Hope they pull it off and have great success with them!!

  • @onebridge7231
    @onebridge7231 Месяц назад +6

    Very cool ship. The U.S. and Canada can’t even come close to Russia’s Ice Breakers.

    • @danmystro
      @danmystro Месяц назад +1

      Tf does the US need an Ice breaker for

  • @robincondite
    @robincondite Год назад +148

    Chemical Reaction???? I thought it was nuclear? Nuclear reactions are not chemical reactions...

    • @elizabethnilsson1815
      @elizabethnilsson1815 Год назад

      The Russians lead the world with the TOP BIGGEST and MOST ADVANCED ICEBREAKERS.
      They are Nuclear reactions and NOT CHEMICAL...

    • @johnwilkes5044
      @johnwilkes5044 Год назад

      Actually, they are. Nuclear reactions are the result of chemical elements decomposing. Yes, yes, don't bother nitpicking those of you who are thinking of it... I'm just trying to explain things simply...
      Chemistry happens when elements are combined in one or another many ways.
      Check out isotopes on Google, should give you a good initiation into Nuclear Chemistry..

    • @kef103
      @kef103 Год назад +19

      Ever hear of the periodic table from chemistry class?

    • @johnwilkes5044
      @johnwilkes5044 Год назад +7

      Yes, I'm intimatly familiar with it. Your point is..?

    • @steveallen1340
      @steveallen1340 Год назад +31

      @@kef103 Ever heard of a sub atom particle? Chemical reactions do not change the nucleus.

  • @glashoppah
    @glashoppah Месяц назад +63

    No worries, Al Gore told me the arctic would be ice-free by 2014, so all we have to do is wait for 2014.

    • @auramdickerson112
      @auramdickerson112 Месяц назад +8

      @@glashoppah The northern passage opened for the first time in Ages in 2012. Close enough

    • @glashoppah
      @glashoppah Месяц назад +3

      @@auramdickerson112 Uh huh.

    • @aaronzaloum7986
      @aaronzaloum7986 Месяц назад +1

      @@glashoppah if you say so.

    • @jaromor8808
      @jaromor8808 Месяц назад

      😁😁😁😁😁

    • @HighlanderNorth1
      @HighlanderNorth1 Месяц назад +4

      ​@@auramdickerson112
      Yep, because having a passageway open for a short period of time is the same as the entire Arctic becoming semi-permanently ice free! Al Gore's predictions are still perfect! 😅

  • @ZIGZAG12345
    @ZIGZAG12345 Месяц назад +6

    Wow this comment section is full of clueless Reddit users who "stand with the latest thing"! 🤣😂👍

  • @lukehorning3404
    @lukehorning3404 27 дней назад +2

    I’m not a big fan of Russia but those icebreakers are pretty cool

  • @conantdog
    @conantdog 3 месяца назад +11

    Great ship builder's 💪

    • @6421rich
      @6421rich 3 месяца назад +2

      Not so great at war ships, tanks or fighter jet
      Or cars for that matter

    • @fredbecker607
      @fredbecker607 Месяц назад +1

      ​. Hammer and sickle tech,cut to shape and pound to fit.

  • @ЯрославНовиков-в2ы
    @ЯрославНовиков-в2ы Месяц назад +4

    One question - HOW? Isnt Russia a country who steal microwaves and washingmachines for chips?

    • @simulatedpilot3441
      @simulatedpilot3441 Месяц назад

      @@ЯрославНовиков-в2ы I would like to see tankers and container ships under nuclear power with four reactors

    • @ЯрославНовиков-в2ы
      @ЯрославНовиков-в2ы Месяц назад +1

      @@simulatedpilot3441 Russia has now a ship that is a nuclear plant by itself

  • @RosinaMuto
    @RosinaMuto 11 месяцев назад +7

    Altissima tecnología SOVIÉTICA

  • @Diaszurana
    @Diaszurana Год назад +19

    I'm going to keep my eyes on this one. VERY impressive!

  • @JohnHill-k6p
    @JohnHill-k6p 5 месяцев назад +26

    Russia always oversell and under delivers. Like most governments. Lots of icebreakers have used the bubbler system. They also use large tanks of water that they can pump from side to side to make the Shiprock. As far as open water capabilities, the wind class icebreakers that were built in the late 40s were made for North Atlantic escort duty. They weren’t the best riding. I know I spent two years on one, but we were in several hurricanes and had waves of 25+ foot and did just fine. We were also even with those small ships under 300 feet 68 feet wide capable of going through 15 foot thick ice. And the ship was tough enough that it lasted more than 40 years of continuous service going to the Arctic and Antarctic, and also breaking ice on the great lakes during the winter

    • @masskracka
      @masskracka 3 месяца назад +5

      @user-zd1du1zk7r huh you come across lots of tropical storms in the Arctic do you

    • @JohnHill-k6p
      @JohnHill-k6p 3 месяца назад +2

      @@masskracka no not tropical storms in the Antarctic or Arctic, but you do come across very severe storms in both places and in order to get to either one you have to go through the tropics. Thanks for playing.

    • @JohnHill-k6p
      @JohnHill-k6p 3 месяца назад

      @IceBreaker-l5r in the early 70s I had the opportunity to be on a Russian icebreaker for five weeks. What I found is the people are just like us. Their red tape is 1000 times worse than ours when something breaks. It’s almost impossible to get a replacement. Their safety measures don’t come close to ours. Yes they’re big and they’re powerful but there’s always a trade-off. Again, the Russians always oversell their capabilities. And what I’m using to compare against is, I was on the very wind class icebreaker that we gave the Russians on a lend lease program right after World War II so I’m experienced in icebreakers and when we got our icebreaker back, it was a total total wreck.

    • @virginiosavani
      @virginiosavani 2 месяца назад +13

      @@JohnHill-k6p And you are convinced that today's Russia is the same Soviet Union as almost 50 years ago...how pretentious. 🤣

    • @larry77117
      @larry77117 2 месяца назад +2

      Polar Star or Polar Sea.
      i helped paint inerta 160 coatings on them at Todd.
      awesome super tough vessels. even when compared to the other military ships We worked on.

  • @janvanholten7592
    @janvanholten7592 10 месяцев назад +13

    This ship is a beauty. Leave it to the Russians, they are very capable!

    • @timothynechville8326
      @timothynechville8326 2 месяца назад

      Ya and our politicians in the west want war with them. Crazy

  • @stephenferrari2362
    @stephenferrari2362 Месяц назад +3

    I’ll save you the trouble. It’s a cool show about cool ships. The comment section is “my dad can beat up your dad.”

  • @sercanse
    @sercanse Год назад +2

    what is the name of the ship?

  • @miketuggle9273
    @miketuggle9273 3 месяца назад +3

    That's nuttin'. I invented a super cheap ultra reliable ice breaker. A 60 pound sledge in my hand. Busts up all the ice i need. And whats really cool (pun intended) is I can pick up the smaller pieces and make margarita's after I get done.

    • @gp8666
      @gp8666 3 месяца назад

      60 pounds? you must be busting really hard if its that swollen

  • @whiskeymonk4085
    @whiskeymonk4085 2 месяца назад +1

    How do I get a job on this vessel?

  • @jjjpetersen
    @jjjpetersen Месяц назад +2

    Clickbait… where the cool red boat on the cover photo?

  • @tikitiki7610
    @tikitiki7610 Месяц назад

    great knowledge and individuals! thx for sharing, fascinating!!

  • @tiomoidofangle102
    @tiomoidofangle102 Месяц назад +2

    I'd love to convert one of these to an expedition yacht.

  • @7071t6
    @7071t6 Год назад +4

    Just think of how good the lodging is on her as well?
    Food and other activities, which is internal, they will not be able to stop, unless there's a massive space which in summer months up north allows the ship to stop and allow the ship mates to get off at the north pole etc. ⚓⚓👌👌✌✌👍👍

  • @MrChriss000
    @MrChriss000 Месяц назад +1

    Will they float longer than the Moskva?

  • @danieladmassu941
    @danieladmassu941 Год назад +13

    The new Leader class looks exciting to my untrained eyes. I hope we see it sooner than later and lives up to its specifications.

    • @dataman6744
      @dataman6744 Год назад +2

      We would have such reservations if we weren't talking about the world's leading country in icebreaker technology and construction. I wonder where your scepticism is coming from.?

  • @lyndon1961
    @lyndon1961 3 месяца назад +2

    smash through that Ice at 10-12 knots,.. are you kidding...

  • @mrMacGoover
    @mrMacGoover 3 месяца назад +1

    Canada better get building similar ships and securing our northern passage and make it economically viable for taxation to countries wanting to use it.

    • @TheTechnoPilot
      @TheTechnoPilot Месяц назад

      We are increasing our northern security, but definitely can be doing more.

  • @jamesgarrison6430
    @jamesgarrison6430 Год назад +13

    Protection from running aground haha its designed to ground itself on the thick ice and fall though it 😄

  • @beagle3247
    @beagle3247 2 месяца назад

    The helipad really should get wind gaurds but I love how military this design is

  • @vanguard9067
    @vanguard9067 Год назад +4

    I hope Canada and the US collaborate on fleet of modern, powerful icebreakers. Together, they can ensure the Northwest Passage becomes a viable trade route as climate change opens the Arctic Ocean to near year-round shipping.

    • @tomascernak6112
      @tomascernak6112 Год назад

      Northwest Passage sucks. It is surrounded by land and thus ice is much thicker, atmosphere is much cooler and sea floor is not deep enough. In summer, it is usable, but in winter is not. Even with icebreakers.

    • @MrZombiekiller23
      @MrZombiekiller23 Год назад +5

      The US is unable to build new icebreakers because they don't have the manufacturing capability to develop thick enough steel anymore, US shipbuilding altogether is in dire disrepair

    • @tomascernak6112
      @tomascernak6112 Год назад +1

      @@MrZombiekiller23 I do not think, that thickness of steel would be main reason. After all USA is still building aircraft carriers which have really thick hull. Problem would be, that USCG wants them to build as warships (ability to carry weapons on board if needed) and for that does not have original contract winner experience or capabilities. This was solved by buyout by military ship supplier but made that 3 years gap between original planned delivery and current planned delivery.

    • @vanguard9067
      @vanguard9067 Год назад +1

      @@MrZombiekiller23that’s ridiculous. Have you ever watched steel-making videos on RUclips?

    • @piotrberman6363
      @piotrberman6363 Год назад +3

      A bigger problem may be lack of "gas stations" in Arctic, and US and Canada seem to suck in nuclear power technology. Russia also invests in ore extracting projects that will add additional domestic demand for the Northeast Passage, ore processing requires power that can come from small nuclear plants and transportation of the products plus all supplies for the mines and the miners. I am not sure what Arctic projects can Canada develop.

  • @HarryHound
    @HarryHound Месяц назад +3

    Awesome

  • @dudley5658
    @dudley5658 3 месяца назад +1

    Why not build cargo subs and go under the ice?

  • @savagemako17
    @savagemako17 2 месяца назад

    You should show counter rotating props on your modeling.

  • @ilkertaysi6812
    @ilkertaysi6812 Год назад +16

    Chemical reaction!!! 🤣 You don’t know what you’re talking about bro!!

    • @The_vincepryor
      @The_vincepryor Год назад +11

      @ilkertaysi6812 The nuclear rods super heating the water creating steam that turns the turbine. Which is a chemical reaction.
      They may have said chemical reaction because they are translating from Russian to English. We don't use the same words.
      So I won't say you don't know what YOU are talking about.
      I will say you are unaware and spoke out of ignorance my dear sibling. 😁

    • @ilkertaysi6812
      @ilkertaysi6812 Год назад +6

      @@The_vincepryor oh boy! so... water becoming vapor is a chemical reaction!!? ok.. I am not gonna make fun of you but it is a physical reaction not a chemical.

    • @The_vincepryor
      @The_vincepryor Год назад

      @@ilkertaysi6812 Things get lost in translation.
      As you know Chemical changes usually involve the production of Energy... By definition.
      Follow me.
      The Russian guy was talking about a nuclear Generator that produces Energy.
      To clarify the nuclear-powered steam engine turned a turbine that produced energy.
      He was translating Russian.
      It is my belief the translator was trying to be concise in his translation.
      The translator is not a physicist.
      Relax bro.

    • @bentheguru4986
      @bentheguru4986 Год назад +4

      @@The_vincepryor ROFL @ That pearl of wisdom.... Nuclear reaction generates HEAT. Heat transfers to water generating steam to spin turbines. The only chemical reactions are that of corrosion which are mitigated inside the systems. Back to school buddy.

    • @fakename8856
      @fakename8856 Год назад +3

      @@The_vincepryor nuclear is not a chemical reaction. Heating water is not a chemical reaction. Do you know what q chemical reaction is?

  • @BEBESSCHET-rs7ir
    @BEBESSCHET-rs7ir 2 месяца назад

    The way the ice pack is melting, maybe we shouldn't be breaking up the ice. It's Probably making it melt faster!

  • @youtube7076
    @youtube7076 Год назад

    15:19 sure no power is one thing, what happens it it capsizes is it still a fool proof reactor?

  • @redbeard8913
    @redbeard8913 Месяц назад +1

    Why do we need new ice breakers if the earth is getting hotter?

    • @johnscalzi6827
      @johnscalzi6827 Месяц назад

      @@redbeard8913 Its not getting hot fast enough for the people peddling hydro carbons they got to get their product to market, so they can make a bunch of money and there by melt the ice faster
      So they can get even more to market and poison the planet quicker,!

  • @jeffthomas4246
    @jeffthomas4246 Год назад +3

    But, however, chemical reactions can lead to nuclear reactions though!

  • @kenkluge9473
    @kenkluge9473 Год назад +9

    Put a laser on the front. Ice problem solved.

    • @flixri726
      @flixri726 4 месяца назад +3

      Using lasers to melt ice is an idea that can only come from someone who has no idea of physics.

    • @yun-z
      @yun-z 4 месяца назад

      @@flixri726 ice can absorb infra red pretty well, so just use IR lasers.

    • @flixri726
      @flixri726 4 месяца назад

      @@yun-z yeah no

    • @skyblue5509
      @skyblue5509 Месяц назад +1

      how about 30mm machine gun with unlimited ammo

    • @aigslmnop
      @aigslmnop Месяц назад

      @@kenkluge9473 yes lasers are too highly focused the power density is unlikely to permeate since ice insulates well

  • @richardgreen4567
    @richardgreen4567 Год назад +4

    This application should be used for all shipping

  • @VerneLowell-t2g
    @VerneLowell-t2g 27 дней назад

    Promises are the uniquely human way of ordering the future, making it predictable and reliable to the extent that this is humanly possible.

  • @henrycarlson7514
    @henrycarlson7514 3 месяца назад

    Interesting , Thank You . I hope it works, and can be built

  • @Spearhead45
    @Spearhead45 Месяц назад +1

    damn russia knows how to make a good looking ship.

  • @VitoEdward-z4j
    @VitoEdward-z4j Месяц назад

    Not what we have but what we enjoy constitutes our abundance.

  • @douglachman7330
    @douglachman7330 Месяц назад

    As long as it has a heavier stronger bow to match the high horsepower.

  • @sissywalker1955
    @sissywalker1955 3 месяца назад +10

    Wait i thoght we were trying to save the ice, so we are trying to break it up? Someone needs to tell Gretta!

    • @dizzleslaunsen2372
      @dizzleslaunsen2372 Месяц назад +1

      In the 1970 there was a smog cloud over Los Angeles, and thanks to regulations the level of smog has gone down significantly since then and air quality is much better. We also used to have the “hole” in the ozone layer that due to banning CFCs and aerosols has been greatly reduced. Neither of those would have been possible if people with your mindset had their way.

  • @HoraceCamilla
    @HoraceCamilla Месяц назад

    If you're in a bad situation, don't worry it'll change. If you're in a good situation, don't worry it'll change.

  • @maxiegrobner9018
    @maxiegrobner9018 Месяц назад

    All this technology and in the end it still gets down to steam. Steam to move latterly and liquid fuel to move vertically. We aren’t really making progress.

  • @michag5561
    @michag5561 Месяц назад

    Congratulations!

  • @tobyw9573
    @tobyw9573 27 дней назад

    Start icebreaker project, start with conventional hull, made with stainless steel with gas turbine engines. Musk is a master of metallurgy, electric motors, and manufacturing. Build simple, medium power ships first. Time to completion is a big factor and will positively affect cost per hour. Musk is a master of continuous development of projects. Perhaps an overhaul of an existing icebreaker is a good start. There may be benefits to catamaran style hulls.

  • @mikebeatstsb7030
    @mikebeatstsb7030 3 месяца назад +1

    Why they don't just have a boiling hot huge shower 🚿 spraying in front of them?
    Or a heated blade like front.. ❔
    Or two of them large metal screw wheel things facing each other along the water line @
    (the Bow? isit) the front of the ship so it could "climb" up over the blockage an use it's weight crashing bk down ² break up the pack

    • @jonathanhirschbaum6754
      @jonathanhirschbaum6754 26 дней назад

      This all been done before. Sounds good, doesnt work. As per climbing and breaking with the mass - thats exactly what is doing. Hence the name: breaker. Not cutter

    • @2012isnear-my-my-my
      @2012isnear-my-my-my 22 дня назад

      that will take you a year to cross a mile

  • @WendyHuggins-t4p
    @WendyHuggins-t4p 27 дней назад

    She had the gift of being able to paint songs.

  • @pashapasovski5860
    @pashapasovski5860 Год назад +17

    Jelouski Ukronazis are plenty here!

  • @id104335409
    @id104335409 27 дней назад +1

    Hydrocarbons.......☠

  • @lilesmw
    @lilesmw Год назад +2

    Incredible

  • @LaurelFreeman-y6p
    @LaurelFreeman-y6p 27 дней назад

    Those who are free of resentful thoughts surely find peace.

  • @colinjames7569
    @colinjames7569 3 месяца назад

    Very cool. Russians are very versatile and very good at adapting. I think ballasts as used by modern US Navy would be immensely useful 😁

  • @SssVvv-q7i
    @SssVvv-q7i 5 дней назад

    stop breaking the ice, that makes ice melting

  • @LeeMartha-k3w
    @LeeMartha-k3w Месяц назад

    Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from not and make a brand new ending.

  • @realistic.optimist
    @realistic.optimist Год назад +1

    Nuclear reactions NOT chemical reactions. I stopped watching at that point. No one checks this?

  • @cckeysify
    @cckeysify Месяц назад

    what are feet?

  • @MyrnaAntoinette
    @MyrnaAntoinette Месяц назад

    How we spend our days is, of course, how we spend our lives.

  • @caldodge
    @caldodge 2 месяца назад

    Nuclear reactors don't generate energy from chemical reactions.

  • @FAS1948
    @FAS1948 Год назад +3

    You need to talk more slowly and clearly if you want to be understood by most English speakers. I have lived in the UK for all but 5 years of my life and I struggled to keep up with what you were saying.

  • @leprechaun7667
    @leprechaun7667 Год назад +2

    This is NOT nuclear! This is a Chemical reaction!!

    • @Virtualik
      @Virtualik 10 месяцев назад

      Works on vodka.

  • @timothynechville8326
    @timothynechville8326 2 месяца назад +1

    They are not Chemical reactions.

  • @staggerinstanton56
    @staggerinstanton56 Год назад +5

    Nothing against the Russian people. Russia hasn't always had the best record with nuclear powerplants. Mobile or stationary.

    • @47ex1
      @47ex1 7 месяцев назад +1

      Please give several examples

    • @Matt-yg8ub
      @Matt-yg8ub 3 месяца назад +1

      @@47ex1 I’m betting their number one example will actually be Ukrainian :-)

  • @jaakkobergman4489
    @jaakkobergman4489 Год назад +12

    FFS use metrics, just like rest of the world....hurts my brain to trying to convert foots and soccerfields and washing machines and toyota corollas and african elephants what your freedom units seem to be....and si illogical convertions between units.

  • @MariaCocker
    @MariaCocker Месяц назад

    Formula for success: under promise and over deliver.

  • @tylernathan7985
    @tylernathan7985 3 месяца назад

    But do they have a plan for the undead?

  • @loganj.2329
    @loganj.2329 3 месяца назад +1

    Who knew nuclear reactors were chemicals reacting...learn sum new erryday

    • @joshbobst1629
      @joshbobst1629 3 месяца назад

      It's true tho. Everything is a chemical, so uranium atoms reacting together are indeed chemicals reacting. It's just not a chemical reaction.

    • @2012isnear-my-my-my
      @2012isnear-my-my-my 22 дня назад

      its just bad translation

  • @LeoMkII
    @LeoMkII Год назад +3

    Well it's way uglier than the older soviet breakers but hey! If it works. They should paint it orange like a stinking castle like they used to do though

    • @LeoMkII
      @LeoMkII Год назад +1

      The original arctic literally looks like some sort of steampunk kremlin roaming the bast ice of the far north lol

    • @Militaryst.
      @Militaryst. 10 месяцев назад

      Не завидуй. Это грех😂😂😂😂

  • @wy9718
    @wy9718 Месяц назад

    Wow so much Natural Gas in Russia! Do all towns have the infrustructure to heat and cook and does every citizen receive a gas allowance every year?

    • @ZIGZAG12345
      @ZIGZAG12345 Месяц назад +1

      Since the Russian state has the most control of the exraction companies, the prices for gas are kept tiny for the people who live there. The fuel they put in their vehicles looks like it's very cheap too.
      Meanwhile, I'm here in the UK. The UK has oil and gas in the North Sea. But......they've given all control of those to PRIVATE companies, so we who live here get to be ripped off and pay extrotionate amounts for it. The governmant puts a nice 60-65% tax on it too if we're buying energy from a petrol station.
      Sometimes, if the private companies don't think they've made enough money, the govt here gives THEM an "allowance"! Prices stay high, it's just that pensioners, unemployed, people on REALLY low incomes etc., have some of the bill paid by the government. Gotta make sure those PRIVATE companies stay rich, y0!

  • @dafrasier1
    @dafrasier1 Год назад +1

    Steam Powered, nuclear 'fired'. Still in the Steam Power Age. not coal but Nuclear Heat boils water = steam.

  • @Yuri_Gagarin44
    @Yuri_Gagarin44 3 месяца назад

    Awesome !! uraaaa!

  • @SamponSweet
    @SamponSweet Месяц назад

    They can conquer who believe they can.

  • @dusancorlija9088
    @dusancorlija9088 Год назад +6

    Use CGS (centimeter, gram, second) system. who care for feet, OK?

    • @josephpadula2283
      @josephpadula2283 4 месяца назад +1

      C,g, s is obsolete decades ago !
      MKS is current practice .
      SI for short …..”

  • @moonlander03
    @moonlander03 4 месяца назад

    Gata love mother Russia.. 😎😎😎😎😎💪💪💪💪💪💪

  • @danieloblinger1199
    @danieloblinger1199 Месяц назад

    One form of uranium, losing neutrons, and becoming another form of uranium is a chemical reaction.

    • @TheTechnoPilot
      @TheTechnoPilot Месяц назад

      No, that’s a nuclear reaction. Chemical is breaking and forming chemical bonds between molecules, nuclear is changes in the nucleus of the atom.

  • @outbacktrek
    @outbacktrek Месяц назад +1

  • @Qatarp
    @Qatarp Год назад +2

    لمصر متأكد بعد ضربها عبدها في كونها وهو و نحنا عشاش صشقار سودان سودان

  • @RidoDrago
    @RidoDrago 2 месяца назад

    Its 100 feet long. Not your feet, but mine. If we use your feet it'll be only 89 my-feet long

  • @themechanic2938
    @themechanic2938 Год назад +3

    The guy at 12:22 sure looks like putin nephew

  • @randyrobertson4686
    @randyrobertson4686 Год назад +3

    Designing the latest and greatest future mega ice breaking ships of the future is a curious endeavor to me. From a practical perspective, and obviously including monetary considerations, from all the chatter coming from peer reviewed studies written on recycled materials, and notarized with the artistically relevant and specifically designed logo made from mounds of material one could find practically blind folded waltzing through a local grazing prairie recently occupied by the most elite bovine specimens in the Northern Hemisphere. Aside from being distracted by the clever and humiliating contraptions strapped to the backs of the poor sheep in the pen over that are connected to their anuses to capture any methane, and you can assist the 2 gravely injured Red Tailed Hawks that were accidentally lacerated by the 130 foot tall eye sore that is spinning and humming just above you. Hopefully the noise pollution won’t interfere with your equilibrium so you can get into your best Flo Jo style “run for your life” routine and get to your Prius. It’s almost inevitable at this point that you could not help but say to yourself…..what exactly is going on around here?
    Despite all this greenery and enormous and endless amounts of capital being pilfered….. I mean invested to combat the next ice age, wait….that’s right, we’re not in the early to mid 70’s. I meant the warming of the planet by humans ourselves and apparently sheep and bovines and other farm animals plus the rampaging SUV’s and small private jets and 15, 8 cylinder limousines that are running nonstop with the air conditioning on full blast waiting for powerful individuals to exit the building after an exhausting 5 hours of ranting and shaming everyone who paid big bucks to watch the individual speak on conservation and reducing pollution and your carbon footprint of inexcusable sizes and how much they need to lead by example…….which will remain their little secret that they don’t.
    But regardless of this…..we must ponder the reasons such enormous amounts of money are being wasted to develop a behemoth of a ship that will be capable of breaking through ice fields that seem to be endless and are so thick that they must be maintained before the ice gets so thick that even a larger ship could not breach. Why I ask, why completely flush hard earned money down the toilet?? A titanic floating machine of these dimensions and thickness will simply not be necessary, for the road we are told that we’re heading down will not require any machinery for a purpose or reason that will not plague mankind anymore.

    • @spicesmuggler2452
      @spicesmuggler2452 Год назад +4

      yikes

    • @vanguard9067
      @vanguard9067 Год назад +1

      @@spicesmuggler2452 Yikes is right! A truly massive, manic, manifesto…oh I am tired already:-)

  • @jonnyringo6338
    @jonnyringo6338 Месяц назад

    Why cant they sell their hydrocarbons in Europe? oh yeah, thats right.

    • @ZIGZAG12345
      @ZIGZAG12345 Месяц назад +3

      Europe decided that paying about 50% more for their energy was a good idea to show how serious they are about, "standing with the latest thing"! 😂
      (Meanwhile some German manufacturers are closing their now uncompetitive plants in Germany and opening more operations in USA and China! 🤣🤣)

  • @davidbonilla7770
    @davidbonilla7770 Месяц назад

    Should we be breaking up huge pieces of ice?

    • @2112kustoms.
      @2112kustoms. Месяц назад

      @@davidbonilla7770 it's sea ice not glaciers

    • @davidbonilla7770
      @davidbonilla7770 Месяц назад

      @@2112kustoms. so destroying it can’t effect water temperature if they’re breaking it up nonstop?

  • @1EliPrice
    @1EliPrice Месяц назад

    Narrator sounds like Tony Hinchcliffe

  • @HanabangIrawan-nu7uo
    @HanabangIrawan-nu7uo 7 месяцев назад +1

    Here is the real biggest icebraker whole the world , russia icebraker

  • @6uiti
    @6uiti 4 месяца назад +1

    8:18 😂

  • @jaromor8808
    @jaromor8808 Месяц назад

    if you break the ice you'll pay for it!

  • @pbtyo
    @pbtyo Год назад +1

    and where can we see a real ice braker? not pictures I mean

    • @DestinationBarbarism
      @DestinationBarbarism 7 месяцев назад +4

      You can look at Project 22220 class that has three ships in service already (Ural, Sibir, Arktika), that are by far the most powerful ice breakers in the world. Taking that title from the previous by-far-most-powerful-icebreakers in the world, the Arktika-class which still has two ships in service (Yamal, 50 Let Pobedy).
      As they say, the Project 10510 is enormously expensive and the Northern Sea Route is not the mega transport route bringing in huge money yet, much of it is in planning stages. So the Russians are holding off with further ships to see how it actually develops.

  • @Canoga_Knuckles
    @Canoga_Knuckles 4 месяца назад

    Pretty graphics, no boat !

    • @xitrou
      @xitrou 3 месяца назад

      In development now

  • @ExecuteBrandon
    @ExecuteBrandon 25 дней назад

    Nuclear reaction, not chemical.

  • @whistlebloer8254
    @whistlebloer8254 Месяц назад +1

    Russia is awesome. They do more things than most people know.

  • @vicrigg9390
    @vicrigg9390 3 месяца назад +2

    The Oceans are boiling why the need for an ice breaker.

  • @fakename8856
    @fakename8856 Год назад +7

    Would need more than 161HP (120KW) of power, would need like 161,000HP. Please learn the difference between a decimal point and a comma; decimal points separate whole numbers from fractional numbers and commas are used to separate number groups such as 161,000.

    • @garyavery2918
      @garyavery2918 Год назад

      There are two types of people 1) those that can complete a project with incomplete data

    • @tomascernak6112
      @tomascernak6112 Год назад +4

      Problem is, that this apply only on countries which were sometime in history under oppression of United Kingdom. Rest of free world, is using comma as decimal separator nad spaces (sometimes dot) as group separator.

    • @DanielOlaiDanielsen
      @DanielOlaiDanielsen Год назад +7

      Please learn the different between how countries use different decimal point symbols before you make silly comments?

    • @fakename8856
      @fakename8856 Год назад +1

      @@DanielOlaiDanielsen ALL COUNTRIES on Earth use one decimal point to separate fractional numbers from whole numbers. You can absolutely never have more than one decimal point for a real number. Here is an example, please add the following: $100.10 + $100,000.10 + $3000.00.000

    • @fakename8856
      @fakename8856 Год назад

      I work in the UK mate. Everywhere on earth numbers only have one decimal point per number. It’s extremely basic math, like 1st Grade mathematics we are talking about.

  • @6421rich
    @6421rich 3 месяца назад +1

    Russia always had the best weapons in the world until we saw them try to take over Ukraine

  • @paulclarke4776
    @paulclarke4776 Месяц назад

    Why are the front of these ships not like a Mad Max style hull?? Pointed blade like fixtures sticking out the front and sides to chop and dice any sea ice????

  • @Lietuva47
    @Lietuva47 Месяц назад

    Атомки даже совсем не плохо ! А то их отходы може уже переработать и опять использовать ....... ;)!

    • @johnscalzi6827
      @johnscalzi6827 Месяц назад

      I hate to disagree but nuclear power is dangerous the waste is not recycled except to make ammo yo use against tanks.
      A 22,000 year half life is daunting man had never built anything that has lasted 22,000 years. How about the reactors sitting on yhe bottom of the ocean whats going to happen when the fuel get exposed to sea?
      Nuclear power is not safe i served on a nuclear powered submarine when i was in the Navy.