2024 Mazda CX-30 e-Skyactiv X acceleration 0-100, 1/4 mile, flexibility | AWD | GPS results

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024
  • Please consider subscribing: / @acceleratingcars
    2024 Mazda CX-30 e-Skyactiv X
    2L 4-cyl petrol
    186 hp & 240 Nm
    6-speed automatic
    18-inch wheels
    AWD
    weight: ~ 1.585 kg
    claimed 0-100: 9.1 sec
    best tested 0-100: 9.66 sec
    best tested 1/4 mile: 16.95 sec @ 136.44 km/h
    00:01 car presentation & info
    00:33 60-100 km/h
    00:58 80-120 km/h
    01:23 100-150 km/h
    01:57 0-100 km/h (x2)
    02:46 1/4 mile
    03:24 speedo vs GPS
    03:34 results sheet

Комментарии • 11

  • @AcceleratingCars
    @AcceleratingCars  3 месяца назад +3

    I was a bit unplesantly surprised by this car's (rather poor) performance. It has just marginally better results than the CX-30 e-Skyactiv G, which has 36 hp and some 30 Nm less. Actually the "problem" is in acceleration from 0 km/h, because in rolling acceleration this Skyactiv X performs quite a bit better. I don't know if it was me (failing to launch better, press some buttons, whatever) or the car itself, but it got worse times from 0 to 60 km/h than the 150 hp Skyactiv G. This car did 0 - 60 km/h in about 4.7 sec, whereas the lower powered version took 4.5 sec. This 4.7 sec time to 60 km/h is a very poor result for a car with over 115hp/T and with AWD.

    • @Messergebnis-liebhaber
      @Messergebnis-liebhaber 3 месяца назад +2

      You have done your job perfectly. There is nothing wrong with your launching technique. The car itself is the source of problem. I have seen several tests of this car in various car magazines and they also mentioned its poor performance. Some even clocked higher than 10.0 s 0-100 km/h!
      I think Mazda is trying hard to both increase the power and improve fuel consumption simultaneously and they have to limit throttle opening to some extent or delay its opening to get better fuel economy. The only solution is to go for Turbo like other manufacturers did.

    • @AcceleratingCars
      @AcceleratingCars  3 месяца назад +2

      @@Messergebnis-liebhaber thanks for your comment and for the provided information! 👍 alles Gute!

    • @Messergebnis-liebhaber
      @Messergebnis-liebhaber 2 месяца назад

      @@dragospahontu Yes, but even Mazda went for it (Mazda 3 Turbo, CX-9, CX-5, etc)

    • @derbigpr500
      @derbigpr500 Месяц назад +1

      No this engine is just dead below 3000 rpm.

  • @ladalout245
    @ladalout245 3 месяца назад +2

    I have a Mazda 3 manual Skyactive X 2wd and the power surges very high in the rev range so I think output is much lower throughout the rest of the rev range, therefore headline figures are deceptive, a graph would reveal all! It's a lovely car to drive when you get used to it and fast if you rev it to exploit the high gearing in the 1st 3 gears but it's clearly engineered primarily for economy. It has a crank driven supercharger so doesn't deliver much power at low revs but I do love it! I wish they'd used a bigger battery to give more hybrid electrical assistance at low revs if anything but it's a brilliant car all the same. It's the only compression ignition petrol engine in existence as far as I know and will no doubt be developed further.

    • @AcceleratingCars
      @AcceleratingCars  3 месяца назад +1

      Thanks for your input, man! Nice to see some Mazda owners sharing some insight 😉

  • @Seba03111976
    @Seba03111976 3 месяца назад +1

    Da, reprizele sunt cam ce trebuie, dar accelerația de pe loc e slabă. Mi se pare ca pornește foarte greu 0-30.

    • @AcceleratingCars
      @AcceleratingCars  3 месяца назад

      Asa e, dupa 40 incepe sa se miste cat de cat

  • @danielpghe
    @danielpghe 18 дней назад

    poti sa faci share la excel? merci!