WHAT CAN YOU expect from the SU-34? WHAT is the PERFORMANCE, SENSORS & WEAPONS for it? - War Thunder

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024
  • The CHINESE LEAKER has spoken and the Su-34 is probably coming, but what is it exactly and what can you expect from the aircraft?
    Patreon: / matawg
    Canal em Português/BR: / @matawg-brasil
    Donate with Paypal: www.paypal.com...
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @matawg

Комментарии • 297

  • @Armata6348
    @Armata6348 3 дня назад +69

    4:45 В is a Russian letter meaning V

    • @matawg
      @matawg  3 дня назад +22

      thats right thanks!

  • @tatihof4919
    @tatihof4919 3 дня назад +65

    The reason that the radar is sometimes called B004 and sometimes called V004 is because the "B" in the Cyrillic (russian) alphabet in the Latin alphabet, is actually a "V". So B004 is with the Cyrillic letter and V004 with the corresponding letter from the Latin alphabet.

  • @mmneaapro596
    @mmneaapro596 3 дня назад +38

    something you might not have noticed
    is that the Su-34 could use E-Sapsan thermal pod and does use it irl
    there are pictures of the su-34 flying with it
    even mig-29smt and su-27sm can use it and did have it equipped at some point.
    Khod (thermal pod) was produced (5 total) for Su-25T and Su-39 and it didn't get added in-game
    (bug report rejection reason, no plans to add thermal pods)

    • @WildChannel-t3p
      @WildChannel-t3p 3 дня назад +3

      Это русский фейк расслабься

    • @Wotplaya4
      @Wotplaya4 3 дня назад

      Even without pod it will probably be fine. The Kh-38MTs give you thermals, apparently it can carry 6. Russian TV/IIR weapons are not nearly as bad to use as NATO counterparts without targeting pod, because you actually get variable zoom and in some cases color camera, and in case of the 38, thermals too.
      Not to mention you can get much closer to the battlefield (12km) without having to worry about SPAA at all.

    • @mmneaapro596
      @mmneaapro596 3 дня назад +1

      @@Wotplaya4 ngl i would rather use laser guided bombs and missiles with tpods

  • @blackjack8697
    @blackjack8697 3 дня назад +6

    The V004 uses a massive passive electronically scanned array (PESA) antenna and operates in the X band. It’s reportedly able to track 10 aerial targets while scanning and engage four of them simultaneously; a fighter-sized aircraft can reportedly be detected at 75 miles (120km). In its primary air-to-ground role, the radar can reportedly detect a large warship at a range of more than 80 miles, a rail bridge at over 60 miles, or a moving truck at 19 miles. These figures are provided for the export version of the radar, so it’s likely that the original Russian equipment possesses superior characteristics. its nose also houses EW equipment.

  • @romanianguy20
    @romanianguy20 3 дня назад +30

    Remember the su34 evaded successfully 3 Patriot missiles in Ukraine love that jet👍

    • @MrUsernameisinvalid
      @MrUsernameisinvalid 3 дня назад +2

      Sure bud!

    • @FutureGohanGlazer
      @FutureGohanGlazer 3 дня назад +22

      @@MrUsernameisinvalidit did lol theres a black box recording of the whole thing on youtube

    • @vczs
      @vczs 3 дня назад +5

      It's just a fat Sukhoi, it won't fly better than any Flanker. Evading SAM isn't really a big deal either especially when you have ample time to make an evasion. What's actually funny with that is the fact that particular aircraft had to rely on some AWACS/GCI to make that evasion which makes it actually worse when you think about it.

    • @LarryPigeon1
      @LarryPigeon1 2 дня назад +6

      ​@@MrUsernameisinvalid coping is hard ay ?

    • @airlightshockZOV
      @airlightshockZOV 2 дня назад +6

      @@vczsWell no, most of these missiles fired by the patriot at it were jammed by its active jamming pods on the wings

  • @Astrofax2.0
    @Astrofax2.0 3 дня назад +11

    The new mirage 2k RMD can only carry mica ir as an aar missile hope it comes this update

  • @acrylo9000
    @acrylo9000 3 дня назад +22

    Imagine with the su34 they announced the remake of flanker family flight model 😍

    • @10TonneSkeleton
      @10TonneSkeleton 3 дня назад +1

      @@acrylo9000 Su34 has much worse fm then any flanker and it's different in too much aspects - big nose with armor, canards, different wing (based on su33) etc.

    • @Iden_in_the_Rain
      @Iden_in_the_Rain 3 дня назад

      And then they move them all up 1.0 BR+ 😍

    • @airlightshockZOV
      @airlightshockZOV 2 дня назад +2

      @@Iden_in_the_RainRight because then they can stand their own so their now broken

    • @Iden_in_the_Rain
      @Iden_in_the_Rain 2 дня назад

      @@airlightshockZOV with how good their missiles are and how good their flight models would be, yes they would be broken

    • @SirCabooseCCCP
      @SirCabooseCCCP День назад

      @@Iden_in_the_Rain their missiles are all worse then F-15/16s so how is it broken that they can dogfight better / as good as them

  • @thunderwithchrissy
    @thunderwithchrissy 3 дня назад +12

    The thing i wonder... how does this channel only have 40k subs? This should be like a popular war thunder news channel talking about things to expect and stuff like that.

    • @nicolefitzgerald9132
      @nicolefitzgerald9132 3 дня назад +5

      he uploads too much in a day

    • @PsyTramper
      @PsyTramper 3 дня назад

      I like his channel and it´s one of my main sources of news together with TEC, but watching his Mig-29SMT videos left a sour taste. His opinion about the aircraft changed 3 or 4 times within like 3 months it seemed and with each "change" he released a new video contrary to the previous. After watching all his videos about it I still don´t know what to expect, but I´m grinding it either way so I´ll find out soon enough. Still one of the best channels imo, at least as long as you take everything with a grain of salt.

    • @thunderwithchrissy
      @thunderwithchrissy 3 дня назад

      @@nicolefitzgerald9132 who said you have to watch everything? i think it's better having a ton of videos because there is more variety and some channels you have to wait for a whole week just for new content.

    • @thunderwithchrissy
      @thunderwithchrissy 3 дня назад

      @@PsyTramper thing is the aircraft changed quite a bit here and there with all the things being added.

    • @LarryPigeon1
      @LarryPigeon1 2 дня назад

      He just nilks stuff more nor

  • @TallyPatka-dz2cz
    @TallyPatka-dz2cz 2 дня назад +1

    the pantsir also has a working PESA radar

  • @STRYKER1467
    @STRYKER1467 3 дня назад +2

    "Su-34M modernised version is to feature a new electro-optical infrared targeting pod, a Kopyo-DL rearward facing radar that can warn the pilots if missiles are approaching, combined with automatic deployment of countermeasures and jamming"
    Su-34M exists in low numbers yet.

  • @dassatisfan
    @dassatisfan 3 дня назад +1

    11:02 RBK-500 can also house bunch of explosively formed penetrator Motiv-3 munitions, similar to US' SADARM project but inside bomb casing, they were used in Syria afaik. thatd be cool to see in game sometime
    and su34 prolly is not coming soon at all

  • @Arturijo
    @Arturijo 3 дня назад +3

    Well the reason for B004 or V004 is probably that the russian "b" is an english "v". So pronounced V004 either way.

  • @RossianNub
    @RossianNub 3 дня назад +2

    Really hyped for this 34 jet!

  • @ballrunners2820
    @ballrunners2820 2 дня назад +1

    I'm grinding Russia currently just because of this plane

  • @Doc_Roe
    @Doc_Roe 3 дня назад +19

    The flying Platypus, Im still confused on why the F15E is coming before the hornet.

    • @slowrider8680
      @slowrider8680 3 дня назад +2

      the hornet might break the game, wait till su-33 or mabey mig-31 and than itl come

    • @Gurubashy
      @Gurubashy 3 дня назад +13

      @@slowrider8680 hornet won't break anything, don't know why people hype it so much. It's close in dogfights with F-16 if you know how to fly it, and worse in BVR since F-16 has better acceleration, better top speed, better climb rate and can throw an AIM-120 at higher speed (higher energy). Even in ground RB the F-16C can do just as good.

    • @sloveniandude9458
      @sloveniandude9458 3 дня назад +5

      ​@@slowrider8680 su33 is just the normal su-27 with enlarged wings and canards for naval purposes

    • @blanchbacker
      @blanchbacker 3 дня назад

      I’m guessing they are waiting for ECM to be finished coding to implement the FA-18

    • @missingthe80s58
      @missingthe80s58 3 дня назад +3

      Ability to engage 10 targets simultaneously. JHMCS. That's pretty damn powerful when the Russians are in a technological black hole through the 90s and as such are waiting for Russia to hit the 2010s to finally have the ability to match the US in part.
      I say in part. As of right now the Chinese J-10A is all that is propping RedForce up. The Su-27SM might carry 8 R-77 but it can only guide 2 to targets and if any more missiles are fired, the first 2 go blind.
      This severe limitation presents a competitive problem for the game. It's why you don't see a change in ARB mode. Russia is literally spraying and praying missiles hoping to hit something after blind firing in BVR mode. Russia needs the clusterfuk of small maps and lots of enemies in that small area just to cope.
      The F-18C opens the gap between US and RedForce even more than previous jets like the F-15C and that jet vs the J-11A was insane.
      RedForce is riding on the gimped Mig-29SMT and 4 missile datalink limit and J-10A and it's datalink limit.
      It NATO got the F-18C with this update and RedForce got no counter, it would end the game.
      But RedForce does advance, they jump from being gimped to actually good radars and radar control computers with PESA radar, it's like going from the stone age to space age at the snap of a finger.
      The Su-27SM with an 80s radar to the Su-27SM3 and Su-35 with advanced PESA radars just like that. Gonna change detection and engagement capabilities instantly.

  • @a0fefd
    @a0fefd 3 дня назад +2

    For everyone yapping about “Germany suffers” just play the bloody MiG-29G, it’s op

    • @fboyg91
      @fboyg91 3 дня назад

      double nerfed flight model, dogshit radar, no fox3s, constant uptiers.... yeah bro totally OP.

    • @a0fefd
      @a0fefd 3 дня назад

      @@fboyg91 if you have more than 2 brain cells you can get at least 2 kills per match

    • @fboyg91
      @fboyg91 2 дня назад

      @@a0fefd what’s your name on WT? Let’s check that KD spread.

    • @a0fefd
      @a0fefd 2 дня назад

      @@fboyg91 doesn’t matter whether I’m good at the game or not but the MiG-29G has missiles it shouldn’t and is the best performing MiG-29 in the game

  • @Greg99rock
    @Greg99rock 2 дня назад

    5:57 yes, they will. there's no way they add this many planes with AESA without modeling the radar type.

  • @rabbaniazzahra1784
    @rabbaniazzahra1784 3 дня назад +1

    Why does it looks SO DAMN GOOD!😭😭

  • @D4nger_CLO5E
    @D4nger_CLO5E 3 дня назад +2

    Hope we see some WILD 4.5s at Christmas alongside new IR and Fox 3s 😯

    • @FutureGohanGlazer
      @FutureGohanGlazer 3 дня назад +1

      Tbh every nation will have super good IR missiles while russia wont high chance of an R-73M which has stronger thrust vectoring giving it 50Gs but it has gate width irccm same as the magic 2 and if they added it they should also remove the current R-73s irccm since it never had it irl

    • @Iden_in_the_Rain
      @Iden_in_the_Rain 3 дня назад

      @@FutureGohanGlazer if Russia gets the R-37M the US better get AIM-174B and JATM, Germany/France/Whoever get the Meteor, etc.

    • @FutureGohanGlazer
      @FutureGohanGlazer 3 дня назад +2

      @@Iden_in_the_Rain where did i mention R-37M???

    • @Iden_in_the_Rain
      @Iden_in_the_Rain 3 дня назад

      @@FutureGohanGlazer before you edited your comment.

    • @FutureGohanGlazer
      @FutureGohanGlazer 2 дня назад

      @@Iden_in_the_Rain it was a typo and all i did was fix it?

  • @pedroafonso7531
    @pedroafonso7531 День назад

    they should add multicrew to tanks and airplanes in sim battles imo

  • @LiamW1ls0n
    @LiamW1ls0n 3 дня назад +3

    Is it gonna have thrust vectoring

  • @Nick_o7
    @Nick_o7 3 дня назад +22

    WT devs have officially lost the plot, we still don't have ecm on tons of planes that should have it already and they are adding completely modern and stealth aircraft that are completely classified so its all just paper fiction.

    • @Spearhead45
      @Spearhead45 3 дня назад +3

      100%.

    • @GripenDeezNetz
      @GripenDeezNetz 3 дня назад +3

      Yep. The SU27 doesn’t even have its wing ecm pods, the F15 also has an internal jammer, the JF17 has an external jammer that can put on. The M2k also has ecm… so many jets that are missing them.

    • @MrUsernameisinvalid
      @MrUsernameisinvalid 3 дня назад +1

      They’ll run out of vehicles to add by next 2026 at this rate. Whats the plan after that? Let the game die? Cause knowing gaijin they wont bother actually working on other content

    • @PsyTramper
      @PsyTramper 3 дня назад +2

      War Thunder has always been paper fiction and it has never claimed to be a simulation. People get carried away thinking about realism, especially since there´s "realistic" and "simulation" mode, but irl there is no scenario in which 16v16 vehicles encounter each other in an otherwise sterile environment so this whole realism thought is pointless from the very beginning.

    • @Spartan-jg4bf
      @Spartan-jg4bf 3 дня назад +1

      ​@PsyTramper You should look at Israel vs. Syria conflicts, during the Bekka valley Turkey shoot, far more than 16 vs 16 engagements occurred

  • @sid875
    @sid875 3 дня назад +5

    Germany still suffering in air it seems...

    • @STRYKER1467
      @STRYKER1467 3 дня назад

      Germany could get the modern Tornado ECR, but its not very different from the others.

    • @SirCabooseCCCP
      @SirCabooseCCCP День назад

      me when i grind a nation that didnt make any aircraft until extremly advanced 4.5 gens, then i complain that they dont have any aircraft:

  • @rav3727
    @rav3727 3 дня назад +20

    What we can expect?
    Well, literally the same thing that happened to the flankers and fulcrums, it gets 4 to 6 days, or even two weeks max, before its flight model gets butchered to the fucking floor and it turns into another flying airbrake
    I mean, otherwise its russian bias innit?

    • @ichosolemanuel6048
      @ichosolemanuel6048 3 дня назад +4

      its a ground attack aircraft not a light manouverable dogfighter dont expect to outturn an f16 in that massive bomber

    • @ichosolemanuel6048
      @ichosolemanuel6048 3 дня назад +4

      @@Apex_warthunder jas39 gripen is the best dogfighter in the game and it has better missiles than any russian jet, is this balanced?

    • @lazer2238
      @lazer2238 3 дня назад +3

      @@Apex_warthunderinsane missiles is an overstatement, aim-120 wipes the 77. Now moving the 27 down to 13.0 was dumb, they should’ve made the fm better. Currently air to air NATO jets are a lot better.

    • @SovietUnion_
      @SovietUnion_ 3 дня назад +4

      ​@@Apex_warthunderwell clearly you don't have russian top tier and not know how 🐶💩 the missiles and the radars are huh.
      US mains really live in an echo chamber

    • @Gurubashy
      @Gurubashy 3 дня назад +3

      @@Apex_warthunder r77 is an insane missile? Do you have any russian jet unlocked with R77? It's one of the worst missiles in the game.

  • @10TonneSkeleton
    @10TonneSkeleton 3 дня назад +10

    8:18 there is no radar in the tail, it was just the project, not a single one was built
    9:54 su34 proved to have no thermal sight at all, maybe it will have t220 "Ход" reconnaissance thermal pod, but i doubt it.
    And there is no HMD for sure

    • @milky6919
      @milky6919 3 дня назад +2

      At 9:18 in the cockpit pilot side I believe it shows a radar point downwards, im not sure if its a second radar though it would make sense to reuse older radars for watching your back instead of using a hmd cause it can't maneuver as well idk tho

    • @10TonneSkeleton
      @10TonneSkeleton 3 дня назад +1

      ​@@milky6919i don't think so. The first from the left screen is datalink and the second from the left is optical targeting system

    • @TheNicestPig
      @TheNicestPig 3 дня назад +2

      Su-34 definitely has thermal. The specific targettings system is even known.

    • @10TonneSkeleton
      @10TonneSkeleton 3 дня назад

      @@TheNicestPig it has thermal only if experimental Ход and Сапсан-Е counts. Otherwise there is no thermals on su34.

    • @АлександрНевский-с9т9я
      @АлександрНевский-с9т9я 2 дня назад

      ​@@10TonneSkeletonесть еще подвес "сыч" , но я если честно не уверен в наличии на нем камеры как таковой.

  • @hwbxjr
    @hwbxjr 2 дня назад +1

    The mad duck

  • @missel-skibidi
    @missel-skibidi 3 дня назад +2

    Cant wait for it!!!!!

  • @VectorGhost
    @VectorGhost 3 дня назад +19

    To be flown completely wrong. It's a medium bomb, not exactly a super fighter.

    • @MrNPC
      @MrNPC 3 дня назад +6

      When you give a plane 12 missiles (8 r-77 and 4 r-27er), what do you expect? xD

    • @maxpopkov1432
      @maxpopkov1432 3 дня назад +2

      @@MrNPC Su-34 is also a massive target and it’s less manoeuvrable then a Su-27

    • @daft9099
      @daft9099 3 дня назад +2

      @@maxpopkov1432 no exactly less, it has the canard modifications for high AOE pulls like the Su-30/ Su-33

    • @christopherchartier3017
      @christopherchartier3017 3 дня назад

      @@daft9099I don’t really know why they did that tbh

    • @TheNicestPig
      @TheNicestPig 3 дня назад +3

      @@daft9099 Canards is *not* for high AoE, it's to balance the center of aerodynamics with the weight shift from the massive oversized radar, cockpit, and armour in the nose. Same thing with Su-30 and 33. Su-35S does not need canards to be supermanueverable because it's a vanilla Flanker airframe with composites in some places to make it lighter.

  • @ValeryKamov
    @ValeryKamov 3 дня назад +24

    and NO EUROFIGHTERS?! BROOO GERMANY IS SO COOKED😭😭😭

    • @PHENOMAS_YT
      @PHENOMAS_YT 3 дня назад +8

      cope

    • @joe_gaming2006
      @joe_gaming2006 3 дня назад +14

      They SHOULD (if the snail doesn’t screw germany over ) get the Swiss F18 C it should have an ir maverick AGM 65F for cas and have all the other f18 goodies

    • @jacobbaumgardner3406
      @jacobbaumgardner3406 3 дня назад +1

      @@joe_gaming2006exactly. Eurofighter at this stage, thing would dominate.

    • @invertedv12powerhouse77
      @invertedv12powerhouse77 3 дня назад

      ​@@joe_gaming2006if i recall, the swiss f18 is nutty because it has its wingfold mechanism locked and a higher g limit. But i could be wrong

    • @joe_gaming2006
      @joe_gaming2006 3 дня назад

      @@invertedv12powerhouse77 wouldn’t be surprised i would be surprised if Switzerland had a aircraft carrier in alps mountains

  • @bradzboy
    @bradzboy 3 дня назад

    I'm guessing this update is going to be called ground pounder.

  • @mamilkman8614
    @mamilkman8614 3 дня назад

    Damn gotta wait til December for f18

  • @ghostscl1084
    @ghostscl1084 3 дня назад

    I'm just realizing most of the community knows about the unfair Flanker's fm nerf and complain about it, but it seems that the loudest people are the ones with skill issue because from what I'm reading most agree that the fm nerfs are just absurd and are expecting the Su-34 to get a hard nerf too. But ofc "Russian bias".

  • @Hawkeye6941
    @Hawkeye6941 3 дня назад

    I want the J11B for China, like only one fox 3 missile sucks for top tier.

  • @harrywisfitt
    @harrywisfitt 3 дня назад +1

    Will you do one about tornado gr4?

  • @careerraindrop5564
    @careerraindrop5564 3 дня назад +3

    NASAMS when, F-16C ground radar modes when

  • @airlightshockZOV
    @airlightshockZOV 3 дня назад +6

    What if they give it the kinzhal 💀

    • @КомандаЛеви
      @КомандаЛеви 3 дня назад +2

      As far as I know only mig-31 is suitable for kinzal.

    • @lis_yt6230
      @lis_yt6230 3 дня назад +1

      ​@@КомандаЛеви нет, кинжал может нести не только МиГ-31К

    • @_b_x_b_1063
      @_b_x_b_1063 3 дня назад

      ​@@lis_yt6230Ту-22М3 ещё, но вроде не Су-34

    • @STRYKER1467
      @STRYKER1467 3 дня назад +2

      It can get Kalibr, S-25LD, Kh-25, Kh-29, Kh-31 ,Kh-35 ,Kh-38, Kh-59 & Kh-101.
      What could it get in War Thunder (for now) ? S-25LD, Kh-25, Kh-29, Kh-38, Kh-59(maybe)
      it can use all bombs as the Su-24M2 but more.
      For AAM's it is the same as the Su-27SM
      The Su-47M Kinzhal is only for the Su-34M.

    • @airlightshockZOV
      @airlightshockZOV 2 дня назад

      @@STRYKER1467 No, the kinzhal can be mounted on the normal su-34, I know this because ive seen it in real life. The Su-34M upgrade is for the R-77M and a better radar and avionics

  • @christopherchartier3017
    @christopherchartier3017 3 дня назад

    I love this plane, it looks like a platypus

  • @wartheunderbro
    @wartheunderbro 2 дня назад

    6:05 us mains finna be balling about “Russian bias”

  • @elite_mittens9483
    @elite_mittens9483 3 дня назад

    Which line do I need to grind ?😐

  • @OldinaryChimera
    @OldinaryChimera 3 дня назад +3

    I'm not hyped because I know they're going to nerf the FM and the missile loadout

  • @Aexgamer48
    @Aexgamer48 3 дня назад

    Wait did I read this right? F117?

  • @Nero-Caesar
    @Nero-Caesar 3 дня назад

    FAB Glide Kits

  • @brycesakal3717
    @brycesakal3717 3 дня назад

    We just want the F-18. No F-15E. Give us an early F-18!!!!!!

  • @tigerbesteverything
    @tigerbesteverything 3 дня назад

    the plz05 is also confirmed, but f117A? WTF?!

    • @Crashgrasse395
      @Crashgrasse395 2 дня назад

      I know but it's squadron, it isn't many variants of the nighthawk thats why i want it in the tech tree beacuse rank 15 noobs is going to fly it

  • @DevilBabyJelly1
    @DevilBabyJelly1 3 дня назад

    Where will it go in the teck tree?

  • @wartheunderbro
    @wartheunderbro 2 дня назад

    10:49, wtf is that image

  • @Ηγδρα_βοα
    @Ηγδρα_βοα 3 дня назад

    ofc everyone is talking about su 34 and not anything else, not even surprised

  • @Zimmy_yegor
    @Zimmy_yegor 3 дня назад

    What about r77-1 and r77m missiles

    • @FutureGohanGlazer
      @FutureGohanGlazer 3 дня назад

      R-77-1 is only a little better than the current amraams and R-77M is the only good R-77

  • @ghazinaeem4250
    @ghazinaeem4250 3 дня назад

    Isn't the su-34 way too advanced for now?

  • @Mr.Bibbles0_0
    @Mr.Bibbles0_0 2 дня назад

    Hi guys, I switched to ps from xbox and wonder is there a way I can transfer my account?

  • @ko11e
    @ko11e 3 дня назад

    FAB 1500 Glide bomb :D

  • @wolfgothicbowgod86
    @wolfgothicbowgod86 3 дня назад

    Su34

  • @user-qq8ek4zs4s
    @user-qq8ek4zs4s 3 дня назад +1

    7:34 Su-34 has no MAW ( even the 34M doesn't ) , it has advanced RWR and ECW yes.
    12:27 You could also add UMPK ( gliding ) and UMPB ( gliding + booster ) bombs to the list , Su-34 was the first platform to use them operationally .

    • @airlightshockZOV
      @airlightshockZOV 2 дня назад

      Su-34M upgrade has a MAWS

    • @user-qq8ek4zs4s
      @user-qq8ek4zs4s 2 дня назад

      @@airlightshockZOVNope it doesn't . Based on released pics of the 34M there is no MAW installed on the aircraft , so unless you want to imply it has invisible MAW please care to point where the MAW is installed ...

    • @airlightshockZOV
      @airlightshockZOV 2 дня назад

      @@user-qq8ek4zs4s The internet doesnt show the best info, also, the maw is only 180 degrees on its back because of the radar on its tail

    • @user-qq8ek4zs4s
      @user-qq8ek4zs4s 2 дня назад

      @@airlightshockZOV Well that's precisely why i'm not basing my assessment on the ''internet'', you are . My assessment is based on inspection of the aircraft , there is no MAW installed on the Su-34 , MAW are based on IR/UV sensors not radar. Only Su-25SM3 , MiG-35 , Su-35 and Su-57 have MAW for the time being .

  • @raulferrerpedro2060
    @raulferrerpedro2060 3 дня назад

    Spanish 🇪🇸 F18 for Italy in the december patch?🤔

    • @KNMRoaldAmundsen
      @KNMRoaldAmundsen 3 дня назад

      Nah, italy never used it, it’s not part of any sub tree and italy already has a good top tier. They’ve got as much reason to add it to italy as they have to give one to france.

    • @jaek__
      @jaek__ 3 дня назад

      ⁠@@KNMRoaldAmundsenitaly in the form of a spanish hornet bruh if they could get it they should get it bro is gatekeeping planes

    • @KNMRoaldAmundsen
      @KNMRoaldAmundsen 3 дня назад

      @@jaek__ Giving italy the hornet would be like giving the US a mirage 2000. Insanely unneeded and sets a stupid af precedent that anything can be added anywhere with no rime or reason.
      Before now top tiers has been added either if, the nation itself operated it (ofc), a subtree of the nation operated it (finland or benelux), or it needs it as filler because it had no top tier aircraft (saaf jas39c).
      Italy never used the f/a-18, spain isn’t a subtree under italy any more than finland is under france (they both have 1 borrowed ground vehicle), and italy doesn’t need filler as they already have a extremely good top tier aircraft.
      And no shit i’m gatekeeping, different nation exist for a reason and shouldn’t have every vehicle. Do you seriously think the ussr and china should be given a f-15c and jas39c?

  • @K-SHABAB
    @K-SHABAB 3 дня назад +3

    GERMANY: GROUND RB🗿 NOT Including German Playing
    GERMANY AIR RB:🤡

  • @liujouji
    @liujouji 3 дня назад +2

    o f-15e nao usa um AESA?

  • @HistoriaGamer.
    @HistoriaGamer. 3 дня назад +48

    Germany still suffers 😶‍🌫

    • @why_do_we_exist101
      @why_do_we_exist101 3 дня назад +8

      eurofighter is commin tho

    • @davidimrefekecs1167
      @davidimrefekecs1167 3 дня назад +3

      Germany always suffers

    • @martinwellhoefer9159
      @martinwellhoefer9159 3 дня назад +6

      ​@@why_do_we_exist101Next year, which is still quite awhile. We'll get the swiss f 18 on december though.

    • @SnoW-pk9zo
      @SnoW-pk9zo 3 дня назад +1

      I mean everyother nation is getting leopards so why even play top tier ground + top tier cas for germany is nonexistent combined with top tier fighters that are either copy paste or flat out obsolete idk i think top tier germany aint even worth it

    • @mich421
      @mich421 3 дня назад +2

      Make a letter to the German government to spend more because you want more vehicles on war thunder

  • @sair.l5314
    @sair.l5314 3 дня назад +4

    Gaijin, please add more SPAAs which have high capability as Panstir S1 to make the game balance better.
    Of course i love new jets and tanks though.

    • @sanmiguel4774
      @sanmiguel4774 3 дня назад +5

      No

    • @TheXquest7
      @TheXquest7 3 дня назад

      So many time passed, and Pantsir still has no alternative

    • @maxpopkov1432
      @maxpopkov1432 3 дня назад

      Other nations need SPAA as good or even better then what Russia has

    • @warspitebstwaifu6453
      @warspitebstwaifu6453 3 дня назад +3

      It's not Gaijin's fault NATO can't into SHORAD

    • @Iden_in_the_Rain
      @Iden_in_the_Rain 3 дня назад +1

      @@warspitebstwaifu6453 except there are several for each nation, Gaijin just hasn’t added them

  • @tahmid-uz-zaman2214
    @tahmid-uz-zaman2214 3 дня назад

    Bro they should add Su-30 first why su -34 too early ?

  • @thatoneguy1741
    @thatoneguy1741 3 дня назад

    Please I want a better Mig 29 😢

  • @PhantomDash-dg8ni
    @PhantomDash-dg8ni 3 дня назад +1

    dont expect much this update,you wont receive the su34 till next year.the high possibility of the su34 being added based on my assumption would be next year summer with a major strike aircraft update

  • @Em_Youl
    @Em_Youl 3 дня назад

    But where is Tos-1?

  • @mab2187
    @mab2187 3 дня назад +1

    Now that I think about it, they should've just went and upgraded with the Su-30's as they are the true multirole Flankers. Su-30 with canards and TVC, tandem arrangement, perfect for air-air, and air-ground. Su-34 is redundant and feels unnecessary, and looks complicated with the dual seat arrangement.

    • @_b_x_b_1063
      @_b_x_b_1063 3 дня назад

      Su-30MKI in Brittain tech tree

  • @Em_Youl
    @Em_Youl 3 дня назад

    Yeees Su 34 would be sexy!

  • @xXManhattanProjectXx
    @xXManhattanProjectXx День назад

    I'm almost certain the Flanker's Canards aren't for maneuverability, rather for stability. Look at the versions who have them, the Su-30/34 which are two seaters and heavier on the nose. They also seem to deflect counter to the attitude of the plane, pitching down when the plane is pulling up.

  • @NPC-1776
    @NPC-1776 3 дня назад

    "leak" literally just a fucking discord message. this community is cooked

    • @spike5911
      @spike5911 3 дня назад +3

      It was leaked by a person who predicted stuff before.

  • @brendoggo787
    @brendoggo787 3 дня назад

    Su 34 look goofy

  • @iantownsend7092
    @iantownsend7092 3 дня назад

    It’s not going to get the upgraded engines, there going to do the same thing they did with the mig29smt, make it a shit ton heavier and no upgraded engines

  • @artuspouliquen656
    @artuspouliquen656 3 дня назад

    no R77-1?

  • @Frost_x_NB
    @Frost_x_NB 3 дня назад

    Naaahhhh SU34 is too advanced right now. At least have the SU30 before hand.

  • @CallMeAK
    @CallMeAK 3 дня назад

    If they dont add India Im finna get mad

  • @sadcide1165
    @sadcide1165 3 дня назад +1

    Had to change to Russia to have fun in this game after being a german main since the beginning.

    • @SovietUnion_
      @SovietUnion_ 3 дня назад

      It's top tier is having exactly 0 fun rn

  • @ghostpcab
    @ghostpcab 3 дня назад

    Nice they adding top tier it just to bad the game fell like that gaijin is doing they best to new people out of top tier less they pay to be there

  • @Арсен-э3е
    @Арсен-э3е 3 дня назад

    Soviets are the last nation to need new cas options..... Should've added smth to japan/germany

  • @StrategicSkies
    @StrategicSkies 3 дня назад +7

    I can expect Russian Bias being put into SU-34 Mat.

    • @black_karlo6271
      @black_karlo6271 3 дня назад +19

      stop crying i dont understand thoose people that complain about russian bias i never have problems aggainst russian planes tanks etc i guess its the skill issue you have

    • @dankaloww1067
      @dankaloww1067 3 дня назад +16

      Yea seriously, Russian tanks have weak spots. Also Russian Aircrafts are Dogshit with the Nerfed Flightmodels.
      Aim-120s are better than R-77s and Aim-9Ms has the best IRCM in the game for less maneuverable over the R-73

    • @StrategicSkies
      @StrategicSkies 3 дня назад +1

      @@black_karlo6271 chill its just meme bro

    • @maxmax-lo7pj
      @maxmax-lo7pj 3 дня назад +7

      @@StrategicSkies Not funny.

    • @maxpopkov1432
      @maxpopkov1432 3 дня назад

      @@black_karlo6271 ok try to cope with yak-1s yak-3s and yak-9s at 3.0-5.7 which all have the flight model of ufos they can out-dogfight almost anything while carrying good armament and are also pretty quick.

  • @Niko_rj
    @Niko_rj 3 дня назад +1

    Su 34 DO NOT have thermals. I didn't find any source or photo showing it. But i saw Su 34 sight without thermals.
    Btw Su 34 can carry 6 Kh 38MT, thise missiles got 2nd gen thermals.

    • @luciusartorius3437
      @luciusartorius3437 3 дня назад +1

      Su34 has thermals but with a limited gimbal limit
      Whatever the fuck they're doing though, the smt should have gotten sapsan years ago

  • @KRIEG-8
    @KRIEG-8 3 дня назад

    F15 e what for? And why russia only get an attacker and where is russian r27 fox 3 version

    • @jaek__
      @jaek__ 3 дня назад

      the f15e is an attacker

    • @Iden_in_the_Rain
      @Iden_in_the_Rain 3 дня назад

      The R-27EA will be added with Meteor, AIM-174B, AIM-260, etc.

    • @jaek__
      @jaek__ 3 дня назад

      @@Iden_in_the_Rain no it will not bruh tf u on, the r27ea is arguably worse than the aam-4 and aim 120a

    • @Iden_in_the_Rain
      @Iden_in_the_Rain 3 дня назад

      @@jaek__ Mach 5 ARHs: R-27EA, AIM-260, Meteor (whoops the AIM-174B isn’t Mach 5)

    • @jaek__
      @jaek__ 3 дня назад

      @@Iden_in_the_Rain literally none of those go mach 5 😭😭

  • @Apex_warthunder
    @Apex_warthunder 3 дня назад +1

    Watch them give it the kh38ml and take away all the downsides of the su-25sm3

  • @pilot349
    @pilot349 2 дня назад

    Tell me ONE thing! Is it even confirmed by gaijin by at least 1 post, rumor? Because, i see videos about new vehicles from LEAKS?

  • @davidhume6275
    @davidhume6275 День назад

    Why the Fullback over the 33 flanker

  • @smash79
    @smash79 3 дня назад +1

    Next time, he could be cool we don't have the background sound of you're games, because hearing the rwr all the time is annoying; Cool video tho.

  • @ehmul1510
    @ehmul1510 3 дня назад +1

    40k!

  • @CounterfeitDuck
    @CounterfeitDuck 3 дня назад

    To flight performance: Unlike any other Flanker (or any combat aircraft) this airframe can withstand only 5G load. Source is a documentary, don't remember which one.

    • @10TonneSkeleton
      @10TonneSkeleton 3 дня назад +4

      @@CounterfeitDuck 5g is the most recommended load, not maximum. F4 phantom can pull only 7-ish G due to manual and look at it in the game

    • @СергейНикольский-я2ц
      @СергейНикольский-я2ц 3 дня назад +3

      @@10TonneSkeletonand it’s not 5G but 7.5G for the Su-34 as well (4.5G with full loadout so with 8 tons of different munitions on its wings and with 12 tons of fuel. But anyway we don’t have any restrictions/mechanics ingame that would affect max G depending on wing load otherwise F-16’s with 6 missiles and wing mounted fuel tanks would rip every time it pulls over 6G and same goes for pretty much any other aircraft such as F-15’s, MiG-29’s, Su-27’s etc)

    • @10TonneSkeleton
      @10TonneSkeleton 3 дня назад

      @@СергейНикольский-я2ц собственно, об этом я и говорю. Каждый раз, когда улитка пытается в реализьм (эдсу на ф16 в патче арех предатель и вплоть до сынов метила), получается какой-то кринж, так что здесь скорее всего сразу не будут вставлять палки в колёса и без того неповоротливому кирпичу

  • @sanda3883
    @sanda3883 3 дня назад

    Matdawg out here forgetting the F-15E is coming with a better radar *eagle screech*

  • @Al_Basileus
    @Al_Basileus 3 дня назад +3

    What to expect ?
    Nothing 😁

  • @gustavofelix3433
    @gustavofelix3433 3 дня назад

    Su 34 It's in the same situation as the f22, it's in the game files but it won't come now, it's too advanced

  • @TylerJC40
    @TylerJC40 3 дня назад +1

    This nuts how much was leaked and how much is getting confirmed

    • @gabeitsche
      @gabeitsche 3 дня назад

      1. alot 2. nothing thats why its a leak

    • @TylerJC40
      @TylerJC40 3 дня назад +1

      @@gabeitschehave you not seen the dev blogs

    • @gabeitsche
      @gabeitsche 3 дня назад

      @@TylerJC40 dev blogs are really just outlines or projections of whats coming from the dev team. nothing is actually confirmed until its physically in the game imo.

    • @aflyingcowboy31
      @aflyingcowboy31 3 дня назад

      ​@@gabeitschehuh? Dev blogs are a showcase of what is coming in the next update I.e. the moment you see it in a dev blog is the moment it is 100% coming to the game....

    • @gabeitsche
      @gabeitsche 3 дня назад

      @@aflyingcowboy31 dev blogs state themselves it could be subject to change. it could give you an idea but the question was whether anything is confirmed. Which nothing is until in the actual game🤷‍♂️

  • @gregito324
    @gregito324 3 дня назад

    Blud refuses to sleep 💀

  • @Lulzwhat
    @Lulzwhat 3 дня назад +2

    I remind you guys: No Eurofighter, Rafale, F-18, Su-30, ARM's = no money next year. Warn Gaijin every way you can! BTW - Su-34 is SEAD-capable(Kh-31). No ARM's for Su-34 = no money!!!

    • @10TonneSkeleton
      @10TonneSkeleton 3 дня назад +2

      А я надеялся, что ты не только с форума, но и с игры выпилился. Пук в лужу от микроволновки даже не был замечен улиткой, так что твой пук в лужу, называемый "бунтом" имеет ещё меньше шансов.

    • @blackfox7051
      @blackfox7051 3 дня назад

      Lulz спасибо что живой

    • @Takemura76
      @Takemura76 День назад

      Dude, shut up.

    • @Lulzwhat
      @Lulzwhat День назад

      @@Takemura76 no.

  • @민원기-m6h
    @민원기-m6h 3 дня назад

    ???:we want f15e
    Russian Air Force:we have f15E at home

  • @invertedv12powerhouse77
    @invertedv12powerhouse77 3 дня назад

    i will never experienced the legacy f18 fight its own era and im sad. WHERE IS IT

  • @emirhanuysal4813
    @emirhanuysal4813 День назад

    Bro why are you making us listen rwr sounds we are already getting enough of it

  • @Em_Youl
    @Em_Youl 3 дня назад

    Isnt it weird, that the Su 34 will come before the Su 33?

    • @D4nger_CLO5E
      @D4nger_CLO5E 3 дня назад +2

      It's because the Su-33 was basically abandoned by Russia. They should have added it and the F18A back with the fox 1s. Now as a top tier the 33 is kinda junk, radar is not fox 3 compatible and it's heavy AF! Look cool 😎 though. We probably gonna see a Su-30 at Christmas patch!

    • @Em_Youl
      @Em_Youl 3 дня назад

      @@D4nger_CLO5E I want su 33 tho 😥

    • @D4nger_CLO5E
      @D4nger_CLO5E 3 дня назад +2

      ​@@Em_Youl I know, I do too...but I would prefer a thrust vectoring Flanker first 🙃 then people will be SCREAMING Russia Bias because of all the crazy 180 turns with r73s 🤣

  • @domkirk4408
    @domkirk4408 3 дня назад +1

    shooting missiles backwards is not a thing, from a physics standpoint alone already.

    • @Janno32_
      @Janno32_ 3 дня назад +3

      It is possible. It costs a lot of energy, but as an example, the AIM-9X and the F-35 can do it with the lock-on after launch of the AIM-9X. FOX 3 can do the same over a data link.

  • @Narrator827
    @Narrator827 3 дня назад +1

    🦦

  • @mexicanyorkshire7617
    @mexicanyorkshire7617 3 дня назад

    Never new a SU-34 existed until now

    • @GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze
      @GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze 3 дня назад +12

      Average MatAWG fan intelligence

    • @code6499
      @code6499 3 дня назад +1

      Just you wait. The flanker series’ of jets will have us thinking that the 6 (for now) Su-25 variants added to the game was a lot. You have no idea 😂

    • @mexicanyorkshire7617
      @mexicanyorkshire7617 3 дня назад

      @@code6499 su-1000 ?

    • @mamilkman8614
      @mamilkman8614 3 дня назад +1

      @@GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze says the dude in every comment section

    • @GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze
      @GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze 3 дня назад +1

      @@mamilkman8614 Hardly