Aaron is a very interesting person to listen to. I have heard him speak several times over the last ten or so years and always come away learning something new about those who lived in the Nashville area thousands of years before us.
Everything is right outside for you to look at yourself. Learn how to read the stones and you will be able to see the true history of yourself. It’s quite surprising.
My uncle found a trilobite fossil in a cave on Cumberland River was studied showed underside it was 13 inches uncle said there was other fossils in cave
Well what good does it do anyone when u find it and stuff it away in some cabinet in the basement of a museum or historical society. Never to be seen again, or if it's really there or in someones collection.
what concerns me is, the Ice Age potential sites which conflict with current academia which does not appreciate Pre-Siberian Sources of people habitation. The Ice Age Glacial Run-offs had a great ability to wash away Pre-Tribal Native evidence of habitation. How do you deal with finding potentially contradictory evidence of habitation that does not fit the current academia mold of "out of Siberia" tribal peoples. First Nations Land Claims have a huge impact on "who was here first". And what I've seen from Dennis Stanford's research is, not all "out of Siberia" people lived here, and spread out here in North America. so First Nations Land Claims get cloudy about "who did come first". I think Dennis Stanford was trying to pull it all together of peoples habitating North America but he passed away. But what he did find though, questions about whom did come first and his data from the East Coast was that Siberian sources of peoples, did not come first. Their tool making techniques did not match up and dates of tools found in Digs did not match up with Siberian Source peoples. He did say, he was open to linking in these people, but at the time of his death. Stanford hadn't found linkage between Siberian or East Asian sources of people tool making equivalent in technique stone tool making on the East Coast of North America. so how much Ice Age wash water damaged your sample collecting because Randal Carson has clearly shown, the Ice Age Glacial water releases were not trickle feed slow river currents.
👉I've watched "professional archeologist videos." They're usually very boring. 👉I'd rather watch "amateur archaeologist videos," like "arrowhead hunters," because their videos show them in action, finding lost treasures, and then, showing off their finds and collections, too.🗿
Aaron is a very interesting person to listen to. I have heard him speak several times over the last ten or so years and always come away learning something new about those who lived in the Nashville area thousands of years before us.
I've found lots of Native American stones in my own backyard, which used to be a pond. I also live near the Rio Grande, in South Texas.
We want more on archaeology from Cumberland River Compact!
YES!
Everything is right outside for you to look at yourself. Learn how to read the stones and you will be able to see the true history of yourself. It’s quite surprising.
Oh hey I JUST heard Aaron on Archaeology Podcast Network discussing prehistoric tattoos. :)
Enjoyed the video
Nice information. Thanks. 😉👍
Trilobite found early 70s was a article written in paper was found in Nashville area Vanderbilt professors studied it
TIL there is such a thing as a prehistoric archaelogist! :P
Just scratching the surface here. Open Mound Bottom already . Purchased in the 70’s with that intent makes it seem way pass due. Keep it primitive.
My uncle found a trilobite fossil in a cave on Cumberland River was studied showed underside it was 13 inches uncle said there was other fossils in cave
Well what good does it do anyone when u find it and stuff it away in some cabinet in the basement of a museum or historical society. Never to be seen again, or if it's really there or in someones collection.
We’re looking at you, Old Stone Fort 👀
13 th !!!
😊
I'm a Native American artifact, myself. LOL
what concerns me is, the Ice Age potential sites which conflict with current academia which does not appreciate Pre-Siberian Sources of people habitation. The Ice Age Glacial Run-offs had a great ability to wash away Pre-Tribal Native evidence of habitation.
How do you deal with finding potentially contradictory evidence of habitation that does not fit the current academia mold of "out of Siberia" tribal peoples.
First Nations Land Claims have a huge impact on "who was here first". And what I've seen from Dennis Stanford's research is, not all "out of Siberia" people lived here, and spread out here in North America. so First Nations Land Claims get cloudy about "who did come first". I think Dennis Stanford was trying to pull it all together of peoples habitating North America but he passed away. But what he did find though, questions about whom did come first and his data from the East Coast was that Siberian sources of peoples, did not come first. Their tool making techniques did not match up and dates of tools found in Digs did not match up with Siberian Source peoples. He did say, he was open to linking in these people, but at the time of his death. Stanford hadn't found linkage between Siberian or East Asian sources of people tool making equivalent in technique stone tool making on the East Coast of North America.
so how much Ice Age wash water damaged your sample collecting because Randal Carson has clearly shown, the Ice Age Glacial water releases were not trickle feed slow river currents.
DNA shows that native people did come from Siberian peoples
👉I've watched "professional archeologist videos." They're usually very boring.
👉I'd rather watch "amateur archaeologist videos," like "arrowhead hunters," because their videos show them in action, finding lost treasures, and then, showing off their finds and collections, too.🗿