It's fascinating, it's interesting, it's extraordinary, but the great thing about the universe is that it is incredibly beautiful Thank you for this, Chris
6:33 Is it my imagination or are their faint structures like lines of stars, going top down and leading slightly to the right, through the central mass? I saw Dr Becky's excitement over these images but couldn't figure out why. Then RUclips suggests your video and I am knocked out and excited also. Well done on making apparent what the joy is all about :-)
Many thanks, Chris, for sharing these first truly stunning colour photos taken by the Euclid Telescope. They convey a totally different view of the observable universe. One question, what causes the ‘bubbles’ of the remnants of a supernova to have such a beautiful purple glow?
Absolutely wonderful video! Thank you! I'm so thrilled to see the Euclid Horsehead Nebula photo! I watch Orion nightly through ny window, and it's facinatung knowing there are planets & new stars in rhat nebula! The gorgeous Spiral Galaxy looks like a beautiful budding pink rose to me!! Thank you very much Dr. Pattison for you expertise!!!🌝
What you need is a bit of perspective. The speed of light in a vacuum is approximately three hundred thousand kilometres per second (or one hundred and eighty-six thousand miles per second). If you were to travel at this speed around the earth's equator at sea level, you would would do so SEVEN TIMES IN ONE SECOND. Just use your imagination to try to get a "feel" for THAT level of acceleration. Now, if you travel at that speed through space for one earth year, you will travel nearly ten trillion kilometres (or nearly six trillion miles). This one light year. The nearest star to our solar system is roughly 4.5 light years away, and the milkyway galaxy is around one hundred thousand light years wide, and contains approximately four hundred billion stars.
@@BLSFL_HAZE ok so first thank you so much, a personal tutor lesson now I do mostly grasp the milky way itself is phenomenally huge and everything else, well it seems close to infinity, but it's not, and besides there are most likely many infinities beyond then see where you switch from distance to time.. which you don't you just change units of measurement.. and space is really space/time,, so that works... but that switch breaks my mind so anyway my homework is to start with the smallest distances, ones my brain comprehends,,, and then work my way up thanks for the map to understanding
@frinoffrobis You're perfectly welcome. It's very much my pleasure. Just to flip the milkyway size around to make it all the more mind blowing; it's so vast (relatively speaking, of course) that travelling continuously at three hundred thousand kilometres a second, it would STILL take one hundred thousand years to cross it's diameter. Compared to the large-scale structure of the universe, this is infinitesimally minuscule. You exist in the VERY SAME reality as these unfathomably vast distances and speeds. Take a moment or two to let that REALLY sink in. Have a wonderful day. 🙂
@@BLSFL_HAZE another same reality is we are made of stardust recycled by infinity at least the milky way is older than the earth would be weird we were a captured planet.. or part of a different galaxy merged like Andromeda and us
Some of your numbers are unbelievable. Two million LIGHTYEARS??? That’s the distance that light will travel in one year times TWO MILLION. I don’t even believe it!!! That’s 186,000 miles per second, times 60, times 60, times 24, times 365, times two million! Unbelievable!!!
This telescope will not discover anything, but should help to reveal the universe to us in a new, clearer, and more detailed way. It is we that must discover new ways of thinking about what we see. Apparently this telescope has been designed by those committed to one theory to show them how dark matter/energy has shaped the universe, just as the Hubble telescope was designed to prove the Big Bang, and the James Webb Telescope to do both. To those more interested in alternate theories like the Electric Universe (Plazma Universe) Theory, it has been designed to find out what clothes the emperor is wearing. Let's call them Birkeland Currents. Which they are going to find but won’t know what they are looking at. So more surprises and complete mysteries are expected to make the headlines. “You view the Universe through the face you bring to it” Anon.
All telescopes have there own specialties. Euclid definitely is an awesome telesope. But ppl dont understand that while Euclid takes more of a wide field view of the universe in less time than hubble and JWST. Its detail is beyond great for its particular assignment. But each telescope has its pros and cons. By the way the ELT....when it comes online will put out some breath taking images as well.
Euclid's survey mission is maping galaxies of our universe at acceptable range, like Gaia did same survey maping mission for stars in our galaxy Milky way. So ithat doesnt wait Euclid to take detail images of galaxies like James Webb at infared instead maping them at a wide range. Different mission', different perspective...So we have to wait maybe 2 more years for really appreciate Euclid..
People who don't think there's more life out there how naive can you get look at how many galaxys and planets there are out there and to think we are alone that would be the bigger discovery
Question, why is this a wide field telescope? I looked at the F-ratio, Diameter 1.2 m (3 ft 11 in). Focal length 24.5 m (80 ft), which puts it roughly at F 20, similar to the Hubble ST. Is it because it is a Korsch telescope that gives it the wide field of few? I couldn't find an optical diagram of this telescope design.
Anyone notice the prominent 'blue-coloured blobs' found throughout the Euclid image of the distant Perseus cluster of galaxies? (It's Astronomy Image of the Day for today, 9th September 2023) I swear I'm seeing a bunch of these blueish objects scattered seemingly randomly throughout the imagery but I'm not sure if this is some sort of artifact of Euclid's imaging process or something else.
All pictures recorded with infrared cameras are not vissualising what you would see with your own eyes, if you were there. The pictures represent an animation of the temperature differences
The star cluster photos have these holes at their perimeter like this video shows with a clump of spheres spreading after impact: ruclips.net/video/gpruSDZYa-E/видео.html
Was there some sort of "Best Space Telescope" contest announced? Is it too late to place a wager? If not, I'm going dark horse and putting my money on Hubble. Crazy, I know, but hear me out....
@@DanBeech-ht7sw I must admit that I didn't see the freaky donkey, it must be a local advert in your part of the internet. Your comment is so funny though 🙂 I use Nord VPN and I guess it don't like donkeys?
@@alphalunamare RUclips seems to throw adverts at you that meet an interest, and I suppose an advert for a charity rescuing donkeys reflects well on my viewing habits
To me, the clusters look foamy around the edges. There are similar sized evenly spaced circles of black areas with no stars or one near the center. For a 3D mess, these would be tubes, and that's weird. In the other images, they are obviously trying to subtract out those bluish optical artifacts in many areas. I wish they would just leave them. In one, there is a gray blank in that spot like they messed it up and went with a total deletion.
Build a space telescope and take a picture of the horse head? That is a waste of telescope time on one of the brightest and largest nebula there is. This is literally beginners astrophotography.
![NOSFERATU - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters December 25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nulvWqYUM8k/mqdefault.jpg)
Wow, Chris! You did a great job with this and the previous Euclid video. I learned so much. Keep up the great work!
It's fascinating, it's interesting, it's extraordinary, but the great thing about the universe is that it is incredibly beautiful Thank you for this, Chris
6:33 Is it my imagination or are their faint structures like lines of stars, going top down and leading slightly to the right, through the central mass? I saw Dr Becky's excitement over these images but couldn't figure out why. Then RUclips suggests your video and I am knocked out and excited also. Well done on making apparent what the joy is all about :-)
I was sixteen the summer we walked on the Moon.
I can't put words to the combined excitement and satisfaction I get looking at these things.
You walked on the Moon ? I though just Armstrong and Aldrin😢
Many thanks, Chris, for sharing these first truly stunning colour photos taken by the Euclid Telescope. They convey a totally different view of the observable universe. One question, what causes the ‘bubbles’ of the remnants of a supernova to have such a beautiful purple glow?
Amazing! Thank you! I love your videos! ❤
Absolutely Incredible
Imagine showing these shots to Galileo Galilei ! With EUCLID & JWST, how spoilt we are. Amazing stuff, well done ESA.
"Beautiful targets to capture our imagination and inspiration" you said it......
Great job 👏🏼 excellent photos and summary 😅👍🤔🧐👀😳😎 10:09
Great images. Thanks for putting the arrow on one to show what you were mentioning.
Absolutely wonderful video! Thank you! I'm so thrilled to see the Euclid Horsehead Nebula photo! I watch Orion nightly through ny window, and it's facinatung knowing there are planets & new stars in rhat nebula! The gorgeous Spiral Galaxy looks like a beautiful budding pink rose to me!! Thank you very much Dr. Pattison for you expertise!!!🌝
so many stars and galaxies it hurts my head, I need to lie down!!
Subbed! Thank you for your fascinating work and explanations!
Cheers Chris… thanks for the update 👍👍👍
👋🏼
Chris? JWST and now Euclid - guess you picked the right time to become an astrophysisist 😊
you tell us how far away things are but those number are so very very huge they are meaningless to my poor tiny brain.. i sorry
What you need is a bit of perspective.
The speed of light in a vacuum is approximately three hundred thousand kilometres per second (or one hundred and eighty-six thousand miles per second).
If you were to travel at this speed around the earth's equator at sea level, you would would do so SEVEN TIMES IN ONE SECOND.
Just use your imagination to try to get a "feel" for THAT level of acceleration.
Now, if you travel at that speed through space for one earth year, you will travel nearly ten trillion kilometres (or nearly six trillion miles). This one light year.
The nearest star to our solar system is roughly 4.5 light years away, and the milkyway galaxy is around one hundred thousand light years wide, and contains approximately four hundred billion stars.
@@BLSFL_HAZE ok so first thank you so much, a personal tutor lesson
now I do mostly grasp the milky way itself is phenomenally huge
and everything else, well it seems close to infinity, but it's not, and besides there are most likely many infinities beyond
then see where you switch from distance to time.. which you don't you just change units of measurement.. and space is really space/time,, so that works... but that switch breaks my mind
so anyway my homework is to start with the smallest distances, ones my brain comprehends,,, and then work my way up
thanks for the map to understanding
@frinoffrobis You're perfectly welcome. It's very much my pleasure.
Just to flip the milkyway size around to make it all the more mind blowing; it's so vast (relatively speaking, of course) that travelling continuously at three hundred thousand kilometres a second, it would STILL take one hundred thousand years to cross it's diameter.
Compared to the large-scale structure of the universe, this is infinitesimally minuscule.
You exist in the VERY SAME reality as these unfathomably vast distances and speeds.
Take a moment or two to let that REALLY sink in.
Have a wonderful day. 🙂
@@BLSFL_HAZE another same reality is we are made of stardust recycled by infinity
at least the milky way is older than the earth would be weird we were a captured planet.. or part of a different galaxy merged like Andromeda and us
@@BLSFL_HAZE thanks so much
Amazing 🤩
Very nice video, very informative.
The purple bubbles look like jelly fish
Absolutely stunning images, but you still can't convince me that we are the only "intelligent" life forms in the Cosmos and beyond.
Some of your numbers are unbelievable. Two million LIGHTYEARS??? That’s the distance that light will travel in one year times TWO MILLION. I don’t even believe it!!! That’s 186,000 miles per second, times 60, times 60, times 24, times 365, times two million! Unbelievable!!!
Why can't the English speaking not used the full names: Euclides, Homerus, Vergilius ? Whats wrong with you ? Is your name Pattis ?
I really dislike the diffraction spikes. Do something about that.
I love your videos Chris! Tx
This telescope will not discover anything, but should help to reveal the universe to us in a new, clearer, and more detailed way. It is we that must discover new ways of thinking about what we see. Apparently this telescope has been designed by those committed to one theory to show them how dark matter/energy has shaped the universe, just as the Hubble telescope was designed to prove the Big Bang, and the James Webb Telescope to do both. To those more interested in alternate theories like the Electric Universe (Plazma Universe) Theory, it has been designed to find out what clothes the emperor is wearing. Let's call them Birkeland Currents. Which they are going to find but won’t know what they are looking at. So more surprises and complete mysteries are expected to make the headlines. “You view the Universe through the face you bring to it” Anon.
I find all of this fascinating but I do not undersrstand why Euclid's travels to L2 were not documented the same way as JWST's ?
All telescopes have there own specialties. Euclid definitely is an awesome telesope. But ppl dont understand that while Euclid takes more of a wide field view of the universe in less time than hubble and JWST. Its detail is beyond great for its particular assignment. But each telescope has its pros and cons. By the way the ELT....when it comes online will put out some breath taking images as well.
Very good and informative. I write sci-fi stories. The possibilities of what's out there are phenomenal.
Euclid's survey mission is maping galaxies of our universe at acceptable range, like Gaia did same survey maping mission for stars in our galaxy Milky way. So ithat doesnt wait Euclid to take detail images of galaxies like James Webb at infared instead maping them at a wide range. Different mission', different perspective...So we have to wait maybe 2 more years for really appreciate Euclid..
Yeah having a google earth like app to scroll around is going to be so cool. More people will find stuff, with a larger vantage point of view.
Perseus cluster of galaxies is stunning... nevertheless is the best among besties...👍🏼👍🏼
Amazing views, I wonder how many people are there in each galaxy visible?
Thank you! Wonderful explanations!
When will Euclid data/images be integrated into the skyEsa data?
The images are truly amazing, but it's the data that matters.
You're going to have to do a video between the difference this telescope and the Vera Rubin Telescope.
Who is this “we” of whom you speak? ;)
He's part of the euclid consortium so I assume he means him and the rest of the team!
People who don't think there's more life out there how naive can you get look at how many galaxys and planets there are out there and to think we are alone that would be the bigger discovery
you are killing us with all the ads, not just you but all the utube channels, good stuff generally but way too many ads
Realy I like this video so so much like you can imagine
Simply incredible. Such variations in our visible universe that at this time it seems to be infinite.
That looks like a Cora head not horse!!! From my point of view
Question, why is this a wide field telescope? I looked at the F-ratio, Diameter 1.2 m (3 ft 11 in). Focal length 24.5 m (80 ft), which puts it roughly at F 20, similar to the Hubble ST. Is it because it is a Korsch telescope that gives it the wide field of few? I couldn't find an optical diagram of this telescope design.
Anyone notice the prominent 'blue-coloured blobs' found throughout the Euclid image of the distant Perseus cluster of galaxies? (It's Astronomy Image of the Day for today, 9th September 2023)
I swear I'm seeing a bunch of these blueish objects scattered seemingly randomly throughout the imagery but I'm not sure if this is some sort of artifact of Euclid's imaging process or something else.
Distant and nearby universe? What does that mean?
I just wonder. What is the blue dots? And in the end the astronomers only focus on 30X20 pixels 🙂
Thanks for sharing. I wish YT knew how to display and share lossless, zoom-able images and videos.
why do you spell color wrong
All pictures recorded with infrared cameras are not vissualising what
you would see with your own eyes, if you were there.
The pictures represent an animation of the temperature differences
nice vid! you might want to put your mike closer to make reflections less audible
Good vid, sound is terrible
Realy I like this video so so much its so interestyng
A lot more data Euclid! 🎈
We are plankton in a sea of eternity. :>)
The star cluster photos have these holes at their perimeter like this video shows with a clump of spheres spreading after impact: ruclips.net/video/gpruSDZYa-E/видео.html
It’s all electricity! I wish you guys would figure that out.
Does this outdo the James Web telescope or rather complement it somewhat?
Was there some sort of "Best Space Telescope" contest announced? Is it too late to place a wager?
If not, I'm going dark horse and putting my money on Hubble. Crazy, I know, but hear me out....
Is this telescope also a good astroid hunter?
Startled to be asked to adopt a donkey halfway through the video
Donkeys are brilliant at keeping Wolves away from the sheep ..far better than dogs.
@@alphalunamare Excellent, but I don't have any sheep. Or wolves. I think the advertising algorithm could do with a tweak.
@@DanBeech-ht7sw I must admit that I didn't see the freaky donkey, it must be a local advert in your part of the internet. Your comment is so funny though 🙂 I use Nord VPN and I guess it don't like donkeys?
@@alphalunamare RUclips seems to throw adverts at you that meet an interest, and I suppose an advert for a charity rescuing donkeys reflects well on my viewing habits
To me, the clusters look foamy around the edges. There are similar sized evenly spaced circles of black areas with no stars or one near the center. For a 3D mess, these would be tubes, and that's weird. In the other images, they are obviously trying to subtract out those bluish optical artifacts in many areas. I wish they would just leave them. In one, there is a gray blank in that spot like they messed it up and went with a total deletion.
I was wondering about those dark 'arcs' they seem natural and I wondered why but was too timid to comment.
@@alphalunamare Just saw this video, and amazingly, it shows the holes I was talking about in the clusters: ruclips.net/video/gpruSDZYa-E/видео.html
You all act like that we never seen galaxies before. Ever time someone sends up a new telescope. WOW LOOK AT THAT! Lol. Shits getting old.
The universe is 99.9% plasma.therexis no empty space,
Build a space telescope and take a picture of the horse head? That is a waste of telescope time on one of the brightest and largest nebula there is. This is literally beginners astrophotography.
Color? Any color is added afterwards. Look at the raw photos: they are all colorless.
Was not God an amazing creator?
And we are alone in the universe.
In a video so full of fantastic images why am I left wondering why the audio is so awful? Sort it aht, will ya?
Brilliant chris , your videos just seem to get better and better 🚀🛰🛰🌙🌞🌞🌞