Back in the 1990s, it was accepted that men had a feminine side. Perhaps to a lesser extent that women had a masculine side. As a male, I felt there was an encouragement to get in touch with my feminine side. Anyway fast forward to the 2010s and now the 2020s, it is as if inner qualities are invisible. All that matters now is if someone is male or female, anatomically. Sexual orientation (LGBTIQ+) and the female anatomy have been granted some superiority. Yet the wisdom of the 1990s was (i.e. is) far closer to the truth. Inner qualities are more important than the anatomy one was born with. They are also more important than surgical changes one may make vis-a-vis one's sex. Does anyone else remember 'Sensitive New Age Guys [SNAGs]' in the 1990s? It was a thing. I haven't heard that in a quarter of a century or so. What I have come to realise is that I am a person. A human being. An individual. Perhaps more to the point... at least for this moment: so too is each person that I come across in life. Each person is their own person. Not only is it true, it cuts out an awful amount of total bs when it comes to interpersonal relationships. When dealing with a person, one is dealing with that person; not with an entire sex, everyone of a particular sexual orientation, an entire skin colour (of all things), an entire age group. None of that. Each person is their own person. It sounds kind of banal to sum it up like that. All the same it is, again, true and also foundational.
!["Royal Bay" FULL FILM [HD] - Joan Crawford Diane Baker (1963) aka "Della"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gE7TWOa01CQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Love the Phantom
Rising joke 🤣
Night 🌉 Court Deja Vu
Dexter finds out There is Another John
😆
Like Carly is the Bartender
Dexter and Head of the Class
Kimberly Russell
Back in the 1990s, it was accepted that men had a feminine side. Perhaps to a lesser extent that women had a masculine side. As a male, I felt there was an encouragement to get in touch with my feminine side. Anyway fast forward to the 2010s and now the 2020s, it is as if inner qualities are invisible. All that matters now is if someone is male or female, anatomically. Sexual orientation (LGBTIQ+) and the female anatomy have been granted some superiority.
Yet the wisdom of the 1990s was (i.e. is) far closer to the truth. Inner qualities are more important than the anatomy one was born with. They are also more important than surgical changes one may make vis-a-vis one's sex. Does anyone else remember 'Sensitive New Age Guys [SNAGs]' in the 1990s? It was a thing. I haven't heard that in a quarter of a century or so.
What I have come to realise is that I am a person. A human being. An individual. Perhaps more to the point... at least for this moment: so too is each person that I come across in life. Each person is their own person. Not only is it true, it cuts out an awful amount of total bs when it comes to interpersonal relationships. When dealing with a person, one is dealing with that person; not with an entire sex, everyone of a particular sexual orientation, an entire skin colour (of all things), an entire age group. None of that. Each person is their own person. It sounds kind of banal to sum it up like that. All the same it is, again, true and also foundational.