If you like my videos do *subscribe* bit.ly/powerplaysubscription and do checkout the *supporting* *options* through Patreon: bit.ly/patreondanielking or through *PayPal* (links in the description)
PowerPlayChess Thanks much for this vid as I’ve been sick 😷 & only recently saw your K’s Gambit “Krush Groovin’ 😉 lol!” I Definitely would have enjoyed watching the game, but forgot about the start due to illness. Again, great analysis! thanks n’ as always, Cheers
Zheng chongsheng - Harikrishna pentala , beautiful beautiful game from round 20th of Chinese chess league ,played today . Please cover it in the channel . Thanks !
This is very entertaining video. Not sure whether I liked the game better or the way it was presented by GM King. Definitely one of the most interesting Chess channels out there. Keep up the good work.
Most complicated and interesting game i have seen this year.Variations were equally dangerous for both colors.Both colors were on the edge.It's a fun game to analyse,and you Sir,as usual,did it elegantly. Love from Bangladesh.
My first thought seeing the game was that Carlsen has actually come up with quite a nifty move order trick against MVL. MVL likes to meet the English Attack with either 6... e5 or 6... Ng4, so by playing 6. Bg5 white rules out both of those options and forces black into a Scheveningen setup. It's quite curious to me that Carlsen quickly found himself with some difficulties when one takes into account that MVL didn't even really try to punish white's move order, but instead opted for a line that could also arise through a 6. Be3 or 6. f3 move order that no one seems to go for as black (maybe this is just a move order thing - black players know that white can get in g4 earlier so they take no efforts to prevent it and try to transpose). What do you think Daniel? I know you're a Najdorf player who prefers Boleslavsky structures both against the English Attack and in the Najdorf more broadly, would you feel like you've been tricked here?
I don't think MVL would feel he had been 'move-ordered' here. The strategy he employed was hardly very original - it didn't need to be, as it was simply strong! ...h5 was a very pragmatic choice which worked well. Carlsen's opening wasn't a great success, although it did result in a very interesting game. Often that is enough for him to win...
I think this game shows a strong side to Maxime Vachier-Lagrave's specialization in sharp openings that can easily go wrong. He was better off playing this kind of game than he would have been going in for a slow technical grind as Black against Magnus Carlsen. And we were better off too.
Thank you for the great video, Daniel! Will you also be covering some games from the 2019 FIDE Women's Grand Prix at all? Gunina - Koneru yesterday was quite interesting, for example.
When things get too complicated in a game, and I can't calculate it through, I just play by instinct. Somehow it's reassuring that the world's elite do too, even if their instinct *is* way better than ours.
I think that ...Nxe4 and black is better, if you take the knight with pawn you lose the dark square bishop and black is just up a pawn, with h4 and the dark square bishop black i think is better here, and if you try to take knight with knight then you will just rake back ...Bxe4 and it is even worse as now the dark square bishop is under attack and there is bishop queen and rook pointing right at c2, so you will have to go fxe4 and again black takes the dark square bishop Bxg5 and will be dominant on the dark squares.
magnus went for F-3 aarrrgghh i told him in preparation not to do that but he does it anyway But then again what do i know i'm a 800 player on chess.com
If you like my videos do *subscribe* bit.ly/powerplaysubscription and do checkout the *supporting* *options* through Patreon: bit.ly/patreondanielking or through *PayPal* (links in the description)
PowerPlayChess
Thanks much for this vid as I’ve been sick 😷 & only recently saw your K’s Gambit “Krush Groovin’ 😉 lol!” I Definitely would have enjoyed watching the game, but forgot about the start due to illness. Again, great analysis! thanks n’ as always,
Cheers
Zheng chongsheng - Harikrishna pentala , beautiful beautiful game from round 20th of Chinese chess league ,played today . Please cover it in the channel . Thanks !
This is very entertaining video. Not sure whether I liked the game better or the way it was presented by GM King. Definitely one of the most interesting Chess channels out there. Keep up the good work.
Most complicated and interesting game i have seen this year.Variations were equally dangerous for both colors.Both colors were on the edge.It's a fun game to analyse,and you Sir,as usual,did it elegantly. Love from Bangladesh.
All the best to you in Bangladesh. I played in Dhaka in 1993 and it was a very interesting and enjoyable trip.
A big thank you to both the players and to you, Daniel, for this wonderful fight and the excellent analysis!
What a complicated game/position. Thanks for your thorough analysis, Daniel.
My first thought seeing the game was that Carlsen has actually come up with quite a nifty move order trick against MVL. MVL likes to meet the English Attack with either 6... e5 or 6... Ng4, so by playing 6. Bg5 white rules out both of those options and forces black into a Scheveningen setup. It's quite curious to me that Carlsen quickly found himself with some difficulties when one takes into account that MVL didn't even really try to punish white's move order, but instead opted for a line that could also arise through a 6. Be3 or 6. f3 move order that no one seems to go for as black (maybe this is just a move order thing - black players know that white can get in g4 earlier so they take no efforts to prevent it and try to transpose). What do you think Daniel? I know you're a Najdorf player who prefers Boleslavsky structures both against the English Attack and in the Najdorf more broadly, would you feel like you've been tricked here?
I don't think MVL would feel he had been 'move-ordered' here. The strategy he employed was hardly very original - it didn't need to be, as it was simply strong! ...h5 was a very pragmatic choice which worked well. Carlsen's opening wasn't a great success, although it did result in a very interesting game. Often that is enough for him to win...
c4: explosive!
Not too shabby for being mightily confused
I thought that comment by Carlsen was pretty funny.
I think this game shows a strong side to Maxime Vachier-Lagrave's specialization in sharp openings that can easily go wrong. He was better off playing this kind of game than he would have been going in for a slow technical grind as Black against Magnus Carlsen. And we were better off too.
Even a draw is interesting when Dani analyses it. Very interesting position with the black pawn on h5.
Thank you for the great video, Daniel! Will you also be covering some games from the 2019 FIDE Women's Grand Prix at all? Gunina - Koneru yesterday was quite interesting, for example.
The fighting spirit comes from the opening.
Partly. Please don't under-estimate the players' attitude.
Finally some Carlsen on this channel again!!
When things get too complicated in a game, and I can't calculate it through, I just play by instinct. Somehow it's reassuring that the world's elite do too, even if their instinct *is* way better than ours.
6:29 If white responds to h4 with Bg5, how does black hold onto the h-pawn? Or does he ignore the pawn and continue with a queenside attack?
I think that ...Nxe4 and black is better, if you take the knight with pawn you lose the dark square bishop and black is just up a pawn, with h4 and the dark square bishop black i think is better here, and if you try to take knight with knight then you will just rake back ...Bxe4 and it is even worse as now the dark square bishop is under attack and there is bishop queen and rook pointing right at c2, so you will have to go fxe4 and again black takes the dark square bishop Bxg5 and will be dominant on the dark squares.
Nxe4 is a nice shot that I missed. It's crucial that it can be followed up with Nxc3+ or else black would just be losing material.
wonderful
"fun game" ? I thought playing something like this would be like having a heart-attack a minute :-) Thanks for covering a great attacking game!
magnus went for F-3 aarrrgghh i told him in preparation not to do that but he does it anyway But then again what do i know i'm a 800 player on chess.com
Nice game👍
That Qa2+ looks risky and entertaining at first glance.
One thing which stands out for Magnus is his pragramatic nature !!
To me Carlsen more and more is resembling a Capablanca, wouldn't you agree? Great defensive player!
👌👏
Very exciting game with a disappointing result 😔