ever notice the true learning subjects have like 900 views 5k subs and no one interacting but if it was something to dumb down, oo good lord 100+ million views lol.....
Matter is a stable for of light which is made out of Aether. Nikola Tesla said light is a sound wave of the aether. Particles are a compression and waves are the rarefaction.
I must say that I like very much the idea of an Eather and that I familiar with your theory. I would say that matter is structured spherical standing waves propagating by deforming space-time. This space-time structure having Plank parameters defining its resolution (of space and time) and the amount of energy those waves carry (mass ). Thanks for giving us the opportunity to reflect and formulate. This is like a canvas that get more elaborated with time...
I have a theory . I will try to keep the explanation as short as possible. The fundamental matter particles periodically sends probability wave to every direction , these waves determine how the matter particle will move . Matter particle keeps changing into particle and then wave of probability periodically. It has a certain frequency of the phenomena .the probability wave function has a certain radius , when it's time to become particle again it chooses any random location on the 3 dimensional spherical wave front . And while it's in wave form it travels at the speed of light and when it's in particle form it doesn't move at all . This is not the full picture but it's close . We all know light travels all possible paths , so does the probability wave of matter because light is made up of this , meaning just like light in no linear paths gets cancelled out by slightly phase shifted light , matter probability waves also gets cancelled out at no linear paths . Now i am going to explain some important stuff that is at the core of modern physics, 1. Quantum entanglement: Since matter has a duality frequency , other matter around one will get effected, while it's in particle form but this particle forms life span is near zero , so if we only consider other matter's probability wave's position while the effected matter quantum is in particle states , the probability wave from the former particle can either go backwards,forwards or not move at all . When two matter quantums are brought closer since the possibility of locations are more in close proximity to the particle the probability wave amplitudes are higher closer , thus both of their duality frequencies increase but shift such a way that when one matter quantum is in wave form the other goes to particle form and vice versa , after their duality frequencies are fixed it doesnt matter how far apart they are their properties will be linked until some other force works on them . This explanation is close but it's not the exact from my theory . 2 .Double slit experiment: When matter quantums are not very close to other objects their probability wave only has linear possibilities but if you put slits in front of those waves other no linear paths emerges which don't get cancelled out because matterial in which the slits are made block those paths which would have blocked the new no linear paths this causes the origin of two new probability wave which interfere and cause the interference pattern , since the matter quantum can only go where the waves can go we see an interference pattern even if we send one quantum particle at a time . 3 . Quantum spin : Before explaining spin let me explain electromagnetic attraction and repulsion, we already discussed that relative to a matters quantum's particle states ( when we skip the moments when it's in wave form cuz at those times it's travel through space at the speed of light does not get effected by anything) another matter quantum's probability wave can go backwards, forwards or not move at all , this can cause two particles get repelled or attracted or get locked at a distance ( quantum locking ) , all interactions are due to these waves and when there is relative motion in the two matter quantums magnetic force arises , so yes even the smallest quantum matter building block will get effected by magnetic field . These are close explanations but not exact because that would be really long .
I think it's standing waves of electro-gravito-magnetism in the electro-gravito-magnetic field that pervades the universe ("aether"), feeding it energy.
There can not be 'particles'. Unless someone can explain - using particles - the effects of Fields (electric, magnetic, gravity) the only explanation has to be aether-based. I like Ken Wheelers explanation of light, and the proton is simply a collapsed wave ('hard light') he calls it. All other 'particles' are just aether perturbations / waveforms, including of course the electron.
The main problem with Bohr's model is that it works very well for atoms with only one electron, like H or He+, but not at all for multi-electron atoms. The application of Schrodinger's equation to atoms is able to explain the nature of electrons in atoms more accurately. The ultimate answer is by Michael Talbot - The Holographic Universe: The Revolutionary Theory of Reality reality material surroundings hardware as math software written as Fourier math series solves two problems wave reality of particles including atoms and is reversible Fourier series from time to frequency domain. Our consciousness works in transforming the frequency wave matter domain into the time domain of course this theory requires energy transmitter of holographic 2D reality and all waves require media propagation luminiferous ether, but ether is dismissed as not necessary, Nikola Tesla the last who tried to show that gravity is fake force, but ...
I think the definition of elementary particles (making of matter) lays beyond the Planck scale, we probably never can have access to. In our perceived world particles look like wave pockets of energy density, carrying different properties: charge, spin, etc. But my idea ends here, as I have no explanation for energy at that scale. I like Wheeler's theory of one-electron universe. Even if it is assumed to be false, the idea is very good to explain why particles are so uniform.
Matter is made of neutral solid particles and nearly superfluid wave particles. That's all I need. With this model I can create other particles in a similar way like you (your PSP). My solid particles attract each other over my wave particles. Two particles will build up a dipole and more than two can build up positive, negative or even (again) neutral charges. Its all about, how wave particles, which are spread in a spicial manner (pairwise in spirals) from solid particles, interact or interfere with each other.
Just thoughts: Could 'particles' be 'standing waves'? The clues is the 'interference pattern'. Note: I am not a fan of 'wave-particle duality'. Assuming 'sub-atomic' particles exists and then interpreting the results of tests to 'confirm' them doesn't sound like 'science'? What are the alternate explanations and how were they eliminated?
OMG! I didn't see what You wrote when I wrote My guess. I said that matter is standing EGM (electro-gravito-magnetic) waves in the electro-gravito-magnetic field that pervades the universe feeding it energy (the "aether").
you need an equation where the border of the electron and the vacuum of space where the resultant wave of the wave of the electron and the wave of the vacuum of space will be zero. From there, we might be able to get properties of your energy wave theory.
Standing waves form from the combination of two waves traveling in opposite directions, as a result of wave reflection from a combination of one or more wave centers. If particles are standing, longitudinal waves of energy, then the standing wave exists only momentarily during the superposition of the two waves. As the waves continue to propagate, their relative positions change, and the standing wave disappears. So, standing waves (particles) can exist only momentarily while longitudinal waves intersect? or does spacetime have some special property that keeps standing waves oscillating (energy conservation) and collapsing only at specific energy levels?
I don't believe it has to be a special property of spacetime as it can be modeled with other waves like water waves, but let's assume constant inflow of waves at same frequency and amplitude. The standing waves should be able to continue. Assuming constant longitudinal wave frequency, now let's play out two additional scenarios of changing longitudinal wave amplitude for the incoming wave. Let's assume constructive wave interference and a difference in in-wave and out-wave amplitude in 3D space. The standing wave should have motion in the direction of minimal amplitude. Then, let's assume destructive wave interference such that wave amplitude is completely out of phase. This should collapse the standing wave such that wave amplitude is now zero. In EWT these three scenarios are: 1) a particle at rest, 2) a particle in motion, and 3) particle annihilation.
Jeff, you and I once spoke on a video call and I asked you some questions. One of those questions was "Do you think there is a minimal limit to how small matter can be?" And you did not have a response at the time, wisely refraining from trying to cobble together an answer during the conversation. I think this is a recurring question here. What is the smallest thing? I'd argue there is no smallest thing. There will always be a "smallest thing we can sense" but I suspect the universe is eternal. Not just in breadth, and time, but also depth. I think way down, matter is always just made of more matter. I think the least amount of assumptions is that matter is made up of more matter, infinitely small and infinitely large. At every level, an object is the cumulative result of its constituent parts.
I will disagree, if matter has no specific building block the rules and laws of nature will not stay the same over time because of the butterfly effect from the smallest level of reality to the macroscopic. If you want me to explain, imagine a infinite size causality, size causality means that the cause is smaller than the effected matterial . Now in a infinite chain of size causality there will be infinite possible disturbance of natural processes making the universe so unstable that entropy will always be infinite. Hope that makes sense .
I'd say that your logic makes sense to me, but I would think that may be relatively large voids between levels that prevent interactions. For example, the difference in size between electrons and quarks, or the distance between earth and the sun, or the sun and the nearest solar system. The universe seems to be made of pockets of dense material, and then huge voids where not much is going on. I think the idea that there's a limit to how small something can be is brain-scramblingly absurd.
I am going to stick with ether. Particles so small that they are not made of parts and hence have no spin. Particles that are so small that they require two hurricane vortexes to create a single photon with opposite spinning vortexes moving in the same direction, an electron and proton with two vortexes with the same spin and opposite directions, and four to make a neutron. Think of the column of an atomic bomb explosion. As the shock wave travels forward at the speed of light it creates a vacuum behind it and the particles that fill that vacuum all have their own momentum with the combined vectors adding up to be a spin. The photon would be a triple helix with two being made of vortexes and the third being a force vector. and electrons and protons having a force vector applied to one of its poles as the two vortices spin around each other. As photons travel through heavier atoms they gain and loose energy making them get closer and further apart from each other with the path of the vortexes having a base speed in a zig zag pattern giving the net speed as being slower. The spin of electrons would be timed and have a queasy syncrination with electrons around it that would explain polarization with electrons being timed with photons to create a giant lattice. In order for electrons to move forward in any direction, they would need to take on a new frequency (more energy = more speed = smaller diameter) in order to stay in time with all the other particles around it. That would make zoo particles having three or more vortexes of the same spin and slightly out of time, and not stable. And other times when I am on top of a mountain, I just enjoy the view. I don't like thinking of myself as being made of wave fronts that could just disappear.
You have excellent graphics in these video. What software do you use to create your illustrations?
For 3D simulations I use Blender. For the presentations with images, it is simply MS PowerPoint.
ever notice the true learning subjects have like 900 views 5k subs and no one interacting but if it was something to dumb down, oo good lord 100+ million views lol.....
Matter is a stable for of light which is made out of Aether. Nikola Tesla said light is a sound wave of the aether. Particles are a compression and waves are the rarefaction.
I must say that I like very much the idea of an Eather and that I familiar with your theory. I would say that matter is structured spherical standing waves propagating by deforming space-time. This space-time structure having Plank parameters defining its resolution (of space and time) and the amount of energy those waves carry (mass ).
Thanks for giving us the opportunity to reflect and formulate. This is like a canvas that get more elaborated with time...
I have a theory . I will try to keep the explanation as short as possible. The fundamental matter particles periodically sends probability wave to every direction , these waves determine how the matter particle will move . Matter particle keeps changing into particle and then wave of probability periodically. It has a certain frequency of the phenomena .the probability wave function has a certain radius , when it's time to become particle again it chooses any random location on the 3 dimensional spherical wave front . And while it's in wave form it travels at the speed of light and when it's in particle form it doesn't move at all . This is not the full picture but it's close . We all know light travels all possible paths , so does the probability wave of matter because light is made up of this , meaning just like light in no linear paths gets cancelled out by slightly phase shifted light , matter probability waves also gets cancelled out at no linear paths . Now i am going to explain some important stuff that is at the core of modern physics,
1. Quantum entanglement:
Since matter has a duality frequency , other matter around one will get effected, while it's in particle form but this particle forms life span is near zero , so if we only consider other matter's probability wave's position while the effected matter quantum is in particle states , the probability wave from the former particle can either go backwards,forwards or not move at all . When two matter quantums are brought closer since the possibility of locations are more in close proximity to the particle the probability wave amplitudes are higher closer , thus both of their duality frequencies increase but shift such a way that when one matter quantum is in wave form the other goes to particle form and vice versa , after their duality frequencies are fixed it doesnt matter how far apart they are their properties will be linked until some other force works on them . This explanation is close but it's not the exact from my theory .
2 .Double slit experiment:
When matter quantums are not very close to other objects their probability wave only has linear possibilities but if you put slits in front of those waves other no linear paths emerges which don't get cancelled out because matterial in which the slits are made block those paths which would have blocked the new no linear paths this causes the origin of two new probability wave which interfere and cause the interference pattern , since the matter quantum can only go where the waves can go we see an interference pattern even if we send one quantum particle at a time .
3 . Quantum spin :
Before explaining spin let me explain electromagnetic attraction and repulsion, we already discussed that relative to a matters quantum's particle states ( when we skip the moments when it's in wave form cuz at those times it's travel through space at the speed of light does not get effected by anything) another matter quantum's probability wave can go backwards, forwards or not move at all , this can cause two particles get repelled or attracted or get locked at a distance ( quantum locking ) , all interactions are due to these waves and when there is relative motion in the two matter quantums magnetic force arises , so yes even the smallest quantum matter building block will get effected by magnetic field .
These are close explanations but not exact because that would be really long .
I think it's standing waves of electro-gravito-magnetism in the electro-gravito-magnetic field that pervades the universe ("aether"), feeding it energy.
There can not be 'particles'. Unless someone can explain - using particles - the effects of Fields (electric, magnetic, gravity) the only explanation has to be aether-based. I like Ken Wheelers explanation of light, and the proton is simply a collapsed wave ('hard light') he calls it. All other 'particles' are just aether perturbations / waveforms, including of course the electron.
We have very similar ideas!
A puzzle is the right metaphor. Pop out a piece to start making gravitational mass.
The main problem with Bohr's model is that it works very well for atoms with only one electron, like H or He+, but not at all for multi-electron atoms. The application of Schrodinger's equation to atoms is able to explain the nature of electrons in atoms more accurately. The ultimate answer is by Michael Talbot - The Holographic Universe: The Revolutionary Theory of Reality reality material surroundings hardware as math software written as Fourier math series solves two problems wave reality of particles including atoms and is reversible Fourier series from time to frequency domain. Our consciousness works in transforming the frequency wave matter domain into the time domain of course this theory requires energy transmitter of holographic 2D reality and all waves require media propagation luminiferous ether, but ether is dismissed as not necessary, Nikola Tesla the last who tried to show that gravity is fake force, but ...
I think the definition of elementary particles (making of matter) lays beyond the Planck scale, we probably never can have access to. In our perceived world particles look like wave pockets of energy density, carrying different properties: charge, spin, etc. But my idea ends here, as I have no explanation for energy at that scale.
I like Wheeler's theory of one-electron universe. Even if it is assumed to be false, the idea is very good to explain why particles are so uniform.
Matter is made of neutral solid particles and nearly superfluid wave particles. That's all I need. With this model I can create other particles in a similar way like you (your PSP). My solid particles attract each other over my wave particles. Two particles will build up a dipole and more than two can build up positive, negative or even (again) neutral charges. Its all about, how wave particles, which are spread in a spicial manner (pairwise in spirals) from solid particles, interact or interfere with each other.
Just thoughts: Could 'particles' be 'standing waves'? The clues is the 'interference pattern'. Note: I am not a fan of 'wave-particle duality'. Assuming 'sub-atomic' particles exists and then interpreting the results of tests to 'confirm' them doesn't sound like 'science'? What are the alternate explanations and how were they eliminated?
OMG! I didn't see what You wrote when I wrote My guess. I said that matter is standing EGM (electro-gravito-magnetic) waves in the electro-gravito-magnetic field that pervades the universe feeding it energy (the "aether").
you need an equation where the border of the electron and the vacuum of space where the resultant wave of the wave of the electron and the wave of the vacuum of space will be zero. From there, we might be able to get properties of your energy wave theory.
Standing waves form from the combination of two waves traveling in opposite directions, as a result of wave reflection from a combination of one or more wave centers. If particles are standing, longitudinal waves of energy, then the standing wave exists only momentarily during the superposition of the two waves. As the waves continue to propagate, their relative positions change, and the standing wave disappears. So, standing waves (particles) can exist only momentarily while longitudinal waves intersect? or does spacetime have some special property that keeps standing waves oscillating (energy conservation) and collapsing only at specific energy levels?
I don't believe it has to be a special property of spacetime as it can be modeled with other waves like water waves, but let's assume constant inflow of waves at same frequency and amplitude. The standing waves should be able to continue. Assuming constant longitudinal wave frequency, now let's play out two additional scenarios of changing longitudinal wave amplitude for the incoming wave. Let's assume constructive wave interference and a difference in in-wave and out-wave amplitude in 3D space. The standing wave should have motion in the direction of minimal amplitude. Then, let's assume destructive wave interference such that wave amplitude is completely out of phase. This should collapse the standing wave such that wave amplitude is now zero. In EWT these three scenarios are: 1) a particle at rest, 2) a particle in motion, and 3) particle annihilation.
Explain photon effect
Do you mean photoelectric effect?
Jeff, you and I once spoke on a video call and I asked you some questions. One of those questions was "Do you think there is a minimal limit to how small matter can be?" And you did not have a response at the time, wisely refraining from trying to cobble together an answer during the conversation. I think this is a recurring question here. What is the smallest thing? I'd argue there is no smallest thing. There will always be a "smallest thing we can sense" but I suspect the universe is eternal. Not just in breadth, and time, but also depth. I think way down, matter is always just made of more matter.
I think the least amount of assumptions is that matter is made up of more matter, infinitely small and infinitely large. At every level, an object is the cumulative result of its constituent parts.
I will disagree, if matter has no specific building block the rules and laws of nature will not stay the same over time because of the butterfly effect from the smallest level of reality to the macroscopic. If you want me to explain, imagine a infinite size causality, size causality means that the cause is smaller than the effected matterial . Now in a infinite chain of size causality there will be infinite possible disturbance of natural processes making the universe so unstable that entropy will always be infinite. Hope that makes sense .
I'd say that your logic makes sense to me, but I would think that may be relatively large voids between levels that prevent interactions. For example, the difference in size between electrons and quarks, or the distance between earth and the sun, or the sun and the nearest solar system. The universe seems to be made of pockets of dense material, and then huge voids where not much is going on.
I think the idea that there's a limit to how small something can be is brain-scramblingly absurd.
Let's not argue over this it's not like proving our points will get us Nobel prize or something.
I am going to stick with ether. Particles so small that they are not made of parts and hence have no spin. Particles that are so small that they require two hurricane vortexes to create a single photon with opposite spinning vortexes moving in the same direction, an electron and proton with two vortexes with the same spin and opposite directions, and four to make a neutron. Think of the column of an atomic bomb explosion. As the shock wave travels forward at the speed of light it creates a vacuum behind it and the particles that fill that vacuum all have their own momentum with the combined vectors adding up to be a spin. The photon would be a triple helix with two being made of vortexes and the third being a force vector. and electrons and protons having a force vector applied to one of its poles as the two vortices spin around each other. As photons travel through heavier atoms they gain and loose energy making them get closer and further apart from each other with the path of the vortexes having a base speed in a zig zag pattern giving the net speed as being slower. The spin of electrons would be timed and have a queasy syncrination with electrons around it that would explain polarization with electrons being timed with photons to create a giant lattice. In order for electrons to move forward in any direction, they would need to take on a new frequency (more energy = more speed = smaller diameter) in order to stay in time with all the other particles around it. That would make zoo particles having three or more vortexes of the same spin and slightly out of time, and not stable.
And other times when I am on top of a mountain, I just enjoy the view. I don't like thinking of myself as being made of wave fronts that could just disappear.