Charge is magic. It is not real. It is a convention. Our Four Universal Motions answer this question and does not need charge. Same with spin and same with magnetism. These explanations are magical and not physical. Empirical equations get in the way of us finding the physicality behind physics. Until we realize this, we will not go forward. Equations kill us. And I am a mathematician. My father and I have tried to do this for the first time with our universal motions. We have borrowed from Borchardt, Dinu, and you Jeff Yee. Yee, especially in the “quantum” realm. We have no aether, no charge, and given physicality to everything and easily explain why the equations for gravity and Coulomb’s law are the same: it is the motion of the fields that are the same: random motion causes gravitic fields. Simply different Newtonian particles at different levels at different speeds.
I agree that the term "charge" is very misleading. Like charged particles ATTRACT each other when traveling in parallel and REPEL each other when traveling anti-parallel. Particles do have differences though. Electrons produce counter-clockwise magnetic field lines as they travel, when viewed from behind. Protons produce clockwise magnetic field lines when they travel, when viewed from behind. The oppositely oriented magnetic field lines of electrons and protons causes much of their differing behavior. Differing mass can largely explain other behavioral differences.
I realize you are trying to describe your waves to be consistent with the current teaching on electrostatics and magnetism. You describe an electrostatic wave as circular and 2 dimensional. You describe the magnetic force as a 3d directional wave. We find the opposite experimentally. When electrons travel through a wire, they produce a MAGNETIC FIELD with field lines of circular shape and 2 dimensional. ELECTROSTATIC FIELDS, conversely, are dipolar and based on a particle's orientation and spin and caused by a a toroidal field. This is evidenced when electrons align and travel through a wire with their dipoles aligned with the wire direction. These electrons interact electrostatically with other electrons and "push" or "pull" other electrons in front or behind them along their dipoles. These electrostatic fields would therefore be directional and more consistent with your 3 dimensional wave that you are attributing to magnetism.
Apologies for the earlier version that had an issue with narration. Re-posting video with it fixed.
Charge is magic. It is not real. It is a convention. Our Four Universal Motions answer this question and does not need charge. Same with spin and same with magnetism. These explanations are magical and not physical. Empirical equations get in the way of us finding the physicality behind physics. Until we realize this, we will not go forward. Equations kill us. And I am a mathematician. My father and I have tried to do this for the first time with our universal motions. We have borrowed from Borchardt, Dinu, and you Jeff Yee. Yee, especially in the “quantum” realm. We have no aether, no charge, and given physicality to everything and easily explain why the equations for gravity and Coulomb’s law are the same: it is the motion of the fields that are the same: random motion causes gravitic fields. Simply different Newtonian particles at different levels at different speeds.
I agree that the term "charge" is very misleading. Like charged particles ATTRACT each other when traveling in parallel and REPEL each other when traveling anti-parallel. Particles do have differences though. Electrons produce counter-clockwise magnetic field lines as they travel, when viewed from behind. Protons produce clockwise magnetic field lines when they travel, when viewed from behind. The oppositely oriented magnetic field lines of electrons and protons causes much of their differing behavior. Differing mass can largely explain other behavioral differences.
I realize you are trying to describe your waves to be consistent with the current teaching on electrostatics and magnetism. You describe an electrostatic wave as circular and 2 dimensional. You describe the magnetic force as a 3d directional wave. We find the opposite experimentally. When electrons travel through a wire, they produce a MAGNETIC FIELD with field lines of circular shape and 2 dimensional. ELECTROSTATIC FIELDS, conversely, are dipolar and based on a particle's orientation and spin and caused by a a toroidal field. This is evidenced when electrons align and travel through a wire with their dipoles aligned with the wire direction. These electrons interact electrostatically with other electrons and "push" or "pull" other electrons in front or behind them along their dipoles. These electrostatic fields would therefore be directional and more consistent with your 3 dimensional wave that you are attributing to magnetism.