MANNN DID THIS TAKE TIME??? 🥵 finally able to get this video out!! It might feel a little bit more edited and blurry but BELIEVE ME it's really the best I could do, this video was getting claimed left right and center. It was pissing me off so much lol cause I LOVED IT! as per usual! and I'm so excited for the rest of the MCU!! Little announcement as well, I started the subscriptions on RUclips and I just posted my first BREAKING BAD reaction in early access for members. Monetization as well as copyrights have been EXTRA hard lately and everything I try to upload gets demonetized or claimed. The subscriptions will allow me to be able to get videos out in early access for members even if they aren't monetized which you know, RUclips and Patreon are currently my job while I'm on maternity leave so putting a lot of hours in editing videos and then having them demonetized is reaaaallly frustrating and demotivating sometimes. So just putting it out there!! I'm already on Breaking Bad season 3 on Patreon but I think it's about time it makes it's debut on RUclips! (all videos will end up being public of course only they will be available for members first) ALRIGHT LOVE YAZ 🥰
I recall you having such a horrible time with The Winter Soldier movie. I know I speak for all your fans and subscribers when I say "THANK YOU" for your efforts and going above and beyond to entertain us all.
As far as how Cap knew about Tony’s parents- You remember in Winter Solder when Arnim Zola was explaining to Cap how Hydra infiltrated and grew within SHIELD, that they were manipulating world events as well. One of the newspapers that Zola puts on his screen has the headline “Howard Stark dies in automobile accident” while Zola taunts “…accidents will happen”. So that let Cap know that Hydra was behind the death of Tony’s parents. He probably even suspected that Bucky was involved in it, but he didn’t know that part for sure, until now.
My favorite little thing about the "a pinch of paprika" is hilarious to me cause his logical mind can't compute a quantifiable amount given vague instructions. 🤣🤣🤣
@@markcruz359 To give an answer that would keep Vision Baffled.... It depends on the Spice and the Quantity that you are making....... A pinch of Paprika is going to effect the flavor different in a recipe for 2 people compared to a recipe for 10 people........ A pinch of something would be more noticable in an 8 ounce batter, and less noticable in a 20 ounce batter......
@@CoastalNomad you're right. I honestly dont remember but wasn't she cooking in a pot though? Vision's not eating. She cant be cooking for herself. She must be cooking for her, Tony, Nat, Rhodey. But yeh i suppose the bigger the batch it would affect less of the taste. But the smaller the batch might require less of it. But i would assume for a dish literally called Paprikash that it would require more than a pinch. At least a tablespoon.
They've fought aliens, Hydra, Loki, and an army of murderbots. But the Avengers are defeated by a man with a high skill set, patience, and a plan. That's why Zemo is one of my favorite MCU villains.
11:00 The thing they gloss over is that they were going to drop a nuke on New York in order to stop Loki and the Avengers prevented the entire city from being destroyed. These are the people they're talking about who would decide when and how to deploy the Avengers.
Consider this. Imagine if the Sarkovia Accords already existed during Age of Ultron. I know, I know, they would have to be called something else, but assume that same law putting them under control of the UN existed during that movie. Imagine if they waited even 5 minutes for the UN to convene an assembly and pass a resolution to send the Avengers to fight Ultron. Ooops! Too late. They might be lucky enough to arrive just in time to front row seats at the end of the world. And, realistically, the UN might not be able to get a resolution passed in 5 minutes. Often, it takes days or weeks. And many resolutions never pass because it requires a unanimous vote from all member countries. All you need is one holdout that disagrees and they're stuck. OH no, now Loki is king of Earth and has a few million Chitauri soldiers and thisps to make sure it stays that way. Bureaucracy is no way to save lives.
My favorite thing about this is the way each "side" has their respective dork, and they're both attempting to impress their team leader. Ant-Man is sitting here trying to impress Captain America, while Peter is trying to impress Tony. They're both goofy as hell!
In battle there is often collatoral damage. Wanda's parents were collatoral damage and she couldn't accept that it can be that easy to dismiss. Now she's caused people to die as collatoral damage. We and the Avengers can forgive her, but to her, she became exactly what she raged against.
40:35 "This is no fun" Exactly😢 On paper, seeing superheroes duking it out should be awesome and a good time. But these Characters are friends. This shouldn't be happening. We CARE about them and what this conflict did to them. That's great storytelling.
This film is loosely based on Civil War (2006) a comic book that opened with The New Warriors (B & C List Hero's) battle a group of villains in Stamford, Connecticut, while filming a reality television show. Nitro who is basically a living bomb explodes, killing more than 600 people. This includes school children, Unfortunately at the last minute Nitro was thrown into a school bus just packed outside the playground of a school. All The New Warriors die as well except a character called Speedball. The rest of the superheroes appear in Stamford to search for survivors, from The X-Men, Avengers, Fantastic Four etc. The Superhero Registration Act comes into play with many hero's agreeing to sign after what happened in Stamford while other hero's decide not to sign as that would mean registering with the federal government as a "human weapon of mass destruction," reveal their true identity to the authorities, and undergo training. Iron man is pro signing while Captain America is anti signing. Iron Man has the backing of S.H.I.E.L.D. while Captain America actually had S.H.I.E.L.D. soldiers follow him creating a divide between S.H.I.E.L.D. as well. Peter Parker who just got a new fancy Iron Spider suit from Tony decides to join Iron Man's side and even reveals his identity to the public. In the end Peter decides to switch sides to Captain America. In the end Captain America is taken into S.H.I.E.L.D. custody where he is assassinated on order of the Red Skull, sniped by Crossbones who just happens to be the villain we see in the introduction of the film. The MCU has The Sokovia Accords instead of the The Superhero Registration Act. Another big difference is the size roster with the comic having more hero's and teams involved compared to the much smaller number we see in the MCU. Thankfully they introduced two new hero's in this film with Spider-Man and Black Panther but it's still not close to the comic where pretty much everyone came together to fight while some hero's decided to stay out of this war all together. Alot of this has to do with Legal rights as well such as Fox owning the movie rights to X-Men and Fantastic Four for example. So the movie as a whole is more of an Avengers Civil War than a Superhero war across all parties but like the comic Iron Man and Captain America were extremely important as the leaders of both sides.
So, spoil the comics....anyway, it came out around the time the first Avengers movie came out, was it? That's why the verbal argument between Cap and Stark?
@@genghisgalahad8465 Just two years before the first Iron Man (2008) and 6 years before The Avengers (2012). The Civil War comic itself was extremely beloved so I have no doubt that Kevin already had plans for a Civil War movie down the line.
I still contend that "Winter Soldier" is the best Captain America movie, since this really is Avengers 2.5. Awesome flick no matter how you class it though, one of the best in the MCU. 27:48 Action sequences simply do not get much better than the "Airport Battle".🤘
I never hear anyone mention it, but while Tony is the one that opted for the Accords, ultimately he ends up trying to kill Bucky entirely out of raw emotion. In that moment, I don’t even think the accords are a thought in his mind, illustrating just how truly useless they are, and how Steve was Right.
Nobody was completely right. The Accords were flawed but they had merit. They did need accountability. EVERYONE needs accountability. This country's government was even built on the premise of checks and balances. Whereever they went they did cause immeasurable collateral damage even if it was unintentional. Someone has to be held responsible for that. Forget they're super heroes. Let's say that there is a bank robbery and hostages are being held. The Police use the SWAT team with an armored vehicle to break through a side wall and just start blasting everywhere to kill the robbers. They get them but they also kill half the hostages in the crossfire. Your Mother was one of those killed. They say, "Opps!!" grab what's left of the bank robbers and go back to the police station and leave all the damage to others to clean up. You cool with that?? That's what the Avengers have been doing. By the way, that is NOT how they operated in the comics. They DID have both government funding AND oversight. They even had a Congressional representative.
@@bryce253 But there already is accountability. They're called laws. Even if you're a superhero, you're still subject to the laws of the country you are in. SWAT teams don't just start "blasting everywhere". When police make mistakes, there are already laws in place that hold them accountable. Just like if a private citizen kills someone by accident or in self-defense, or in defense of another. If anyone in the New York City government wants to issue an arrest warrant for any or all of the Avengers because of damage done during the Chitauri invasion, they can do so. (Though, it didn't seem that anyone did.) Likewise, if the Sokovian government wanted to put Tony on trial for unleashing Ultron, they could have. And if the Brazilian government wanted General Ross held accountable for his military operation on their soil, which resulted in massive property damage and civilian casualties, they also can. Is Ross himself willing to be held accountable for any of his own idiotic and criminal actions?
@@bryce253 But there's still going to be collateral damage even if they're sent by the counsel. It's unavoidable. No one seems to mention that either. There was never one iota of criminal intent on their part. The concept of accountability here is insane.
Some of the best lines in this. Friday- “You can’t beat him hand to hand!” Cap: “He’s my friend “ Tony: “ So was I” Tony: “You don’t deserve it! My father made that shield!” T’Challa: “So I ask you. As both warrior and king. How long do you think you can keep your friend safe from me.”
26:26 The Mind Stone is indeed the source of Wanda's power. Age of Ultron: Wanda and her brother Pietro volunteered to be test subjects for Baron von Strucker, who had Loki's scepter. The Mind Stone somehow enabled Wanda to channel and use "chaos magic" to mess with people's minds as well as cause massive physical destruction.
Oh, there was one brief previous mention of Dr. Strange in the MCU, also in Winter Soldier. When Cap and Nat are on the rooftop with Agent Sitwell, he mentions some people that Zola’s algorithm will be targeting to kill. One of the names he mentions is Dr. Strange.
One of the things that bothers me about the Secretary of Defense guilting some of the Avengers into signing the SA. I would have loved if Tony or Steve or anybody, just spoke up and said “Aren't you the person that ordered several tactical nuclear strikes against New York City?!”
I think out of every MCU film to date, this is the best film at balancing multiple storylines. It had its own primary story (Cap shielding Bucky against the other Avengers) but had a lot of side stories and character development that circled around the main story.
I'm definitely on Cap's side of this. The Accords say that a multi-national government agency decides when the Avengers go in. Not only would that be a bureaucracy, but it would be one with many differing agendas. It is difficult enough now to get the US government to agree on anything, think of how it would be with multiple nations involved. Even locally, it takes time to make decisions. For example, in Malibu, CA in October, 4 students from Pepperdine University were killed by a speeding driver on Pacific Coast Highway. And crashes caused by excessive speed happen frequently on PCH. Everyone agrees that something must be done. So now, more than two full months since the accident, what has been done? The city government has commissioned a study to determine what they can do and what the state can do. Yet nothing really has been done. And that is a local and state matter. Most of the time, when the Avengers are needed, they don't have the luxury of time to conduct a study. Action is needed immediately, not several months or years from now. Would they have had time to wait for a multi-national decision when it came to the Invasion of New York by the Chitauri ("The Avengers")?
Obviously it would've been protocols of in which scenario they'd had permission to act immediately,the entire thing about working under supervision doesn't mean that they need to wait for a whole panel to reunite so they can have a debate,it's about the panel (from which the avengers were part of thanks to Tony helping to write the accords) would put rules... like "hey don't take my militarized jet and equipment to break borders hiding information about potential terrorist attacks from the local authorities to right after blow a building an go back home without even helping to clean...) war machine worked with those rules pretty much always and nobody bothered because he was always available, even being him the one sent after Steve in Germany... What you suggest about doing something to prevent things from happening is exactly what Steve stopped in his second movie,and he could've just landed those things or said Tony to take care of his toys but instead he destroyed 'em in the air killing uncountable people... Literally how difficult it could've been to call Tony and say "yeah they wanna use your technology to kill people" and have Tony just turning them off?... And in the avengers they was already working under supervision of Fury,who was a directive of a governmental entity...
@@S.m1115 In Winter Soldier, Stark made suggestions to the technology. He didn't control it. And in Avengers, an oversight panel decided the best option was to nuke NYC. I'm not saying the accords were a god-awful idea, but there were valid concerns
Originally, in the comics, Peter Parker makes artificial webbing and shoots it from devices that he wears on his wrists. In the Tobey Maguire films, director Sam Raimi changed it so that Peter makes organic webbing from his own body.
24:30 Oh yeah peter makes his own webbing that is then placed inside a cartridge that Spider-Man loads into his custom built web shooters. Toby though has organic web shooters, allowing his body to make the webs and shoot them from his wrist. But for most Spider-Man renditions across comics, animation, and movies they use the custom built web shooters. Funny enough Toby originally had the web shooters, there's footage you can find online of Peter wearing the wrist web shooters but sometime near the end of production they went with the organic web shooters instead, last minute change.
In the comics, this was a HUGE story that had far-reaching implications, and basically split the Marvel universe down the middle between Cap’s side and Tony’s side. Many characters, teams, groups, and even villains were involved in the fight against each other, except the really powerful characters.
5:15 "She saved him but I guess that was a little mmmm." She saved a hundred bystanders too. What she did was right, but it's also highly visible and destructive. Or, maybe she could have moved it up AND away from the building. Hard to tell.
Yeah, a lot more people would have died in the open air market than died in the building, if she hadn't moved the explosion. And maybe she couldn't quite control her power to contain the explosion as long as she wanted. Has she ever contained an explosion before? Plus the tactical inexperience. But how do you get experience using a superpower that no one has ever had before? I think she was trying to movie the explosion straight up - even higher than the building - way up in the sky, where it wouldn't have hurt anyone, but she only got it part way up when she lost containment.
11:40 "Can't we just do a trial before making it official?" Ahhh, so young. No. Definitely not. When you give up your rights to a government, they never give them back without a huge fight. Fight for your rights BEFORE they take them away from you, not after.
The Irony are the Roll Reversals Tony/Steve took. The Soldier chooses Freedom of Action, While the Industrialist chooses Government Oversight. TRUST ME, Things will get much better AND much worse, But the ride keeps on getting better and better!
8:08 This is so wrong, what he's doing, here. He's trying to illustrate the Avengers as a threat to public safety by using footage of them actually fighting a dangerous _incursion._
For the events of the Age of Ultron , Stark is the one that caused all of it. Ultron was his fault so any death was on his shoulders, thats why he was so promt to be in check. the New York thing was out of their control , same as winter soldier events, but Ultron has a big oops and haunted Stark .
7:10 "I think I see a theme." In some ways, I love this movie. The action is awesome. In other ways, I think this is just about the dumbest MCU movie in all of the first 3 phases. I mean, the Avengers have saved, by my count, approximately 20 billion people, give or take. Yeah, a few hundred died here, a few thousand died there - and all those deaths were caused by the villains, not by the Avengers. Even what happened with Scarlet Witch in this movie: she saved hundreds and probably only a few innocent people died. "Victory at the expense of the innocent is no victory at all." (said by some guy in the movie on TV). That is dead wrong. 100% wrong. When the bad guys are murdering innocent people, THEY MUST BE STOPPED. Yeah, you try to help the innocents get away, of course, but if the bad guys kill some before you stop them, that is the fault of the bad guys, not the heroes stopping them. What this guy said was basically "World War 2 should never have happened. Yeah, sure, Hitler and Nazi Germany were killing millions of innocents, but the allies should have remembered my rule: Victory at the cost of innocents is no victory at all. Since there was no way to stop Nazi Germany without more innocent deaths, there was no path to victory at all, so the allied troops should have just stayed home and let Hitler do whatever he wanted." I mean, that's basically the stupid thing this guy just said. Worse, that is the logic this entire movie is based on: pure stupidity. Ah, well, at least the action is good.
Indeed. What do you call a war in which innocent people die? Answer: A war. What do you call a war in which no innocent people die? Answer: A unicorn. Because those don't exist, either. King T'Chaka's statement is one of the dumbest things ever said. And the writers of this movie expect us to respect him?
Just an FYI they mentioned Dr strange briefly in captain America the winter soldier on the rooftop scene where they show the falcons wings for the first time but most won’t catch that. I hope you start watching these more often, phase 3 is the best by far and every film is great in this phase and you got the two best
Great Reaction........ In Wnter Soldier you stated "who could blame Bucky and hold him responsible for things he did while he was under"..... You did a Great Job of understanding both sides/both points of View.... One Reason I think Tony is more torn up by his mom's death, is since his dad worked for Shield, He knew he could be a target.... Tony's mom wasn't involved, so she could be viewed as an Innocent....
Also....Tony and his father were always at odds with each other. Howard was always busy and didn't spend enough time with Tony when he was a child. He always talked about Captain America, which made Tony jealous and resentful. The young adult Tony was rebellious and cold towards his father. Tony's mother was there for him, so he was naturally hurt much more when she died.
I'm pretty sure Holland just sat with his legs on the bed naturally not realizing it would block RDJ from sitting, so Holland's legs weren't even supposed to be there to begin with.
8:16-8:20 "If they don't do anything, it would be even worse, no?" Now that the "genie is out of the bottle" yes. 8:23-8:26 "He's (Steve) very protective of her (Wanda)" Steve has been there, he's seen the losses he couldn't stop. He can see she blames herself, because if she had held the explosion longer, all those people wouldn't have died. She wasn't brought up to be a protector, and she lost the only family she had by turning against Ultron. She's the new member of the family. The baby sister. She also happens to be the member of the family you want upset about as much as you want Bruce Banner (Hulk) upset. So, as my father would say "Don't poke the bear."
And at this point she's the youngest Avenger(excluding Vision) so she's actually the baby of the team. He also sees a lot of himself in her because she too agreed to be experimented on for her country in a time of war. And after Pietro died, she has nobody from before her time as an Avenger left just like him(except for Bucky) so they're both very alone outside the company of the other Avengers.
I'm team Cap. I don't trust the UN to do anything right. Segovia was Tony's fault, pure and simple, when he created Ultron. BTW, Tony is still suffering from PTSD. The Accords are him trying to subconsciously address his survivors guilt. Remember the nightmare Wanda planted in his head? That still haunts him. I am in many ways a cynical person. There are few groups I trust that much. This is why I don't think the Accords would work. Thing is, good people with good intentions support the Accords. That's what makes this an interesting movie. Next up, Doctor Strange!
Great reaction to another great movie! I'm completely Team Cap in this because I know that government bureaucracies and the United Nations (ha) work for their best interests and their own power, and bureaucracies are the most ineffective and expensive way to do anything, since they'll decide to waste lots of time and money "studying" a situation and by the time they come to a decision the thing that they are deciding on has already been resolved and their decision is a moot point. It's funny, and shows the great amount of thought that went into the first three phases of the MCU, that the attitudes of Steve and Tony have completely changed by this movie. Tony knew he was the smartest man anywhere and that any decision he made would be the best one, so he refused to accept outside limitations on his life. Then the unmitigated disaster of Ultron that came from his hubris didn't just shake his self-confidence, it destroyed it. Tony no longer trusts himself so he is all for the Accords so that there's always someone keeping him from screwing up like that again (in theory). Steve has gone from absolute trust in leadership to only trusting a very few people who have proven themselves to him, thanks to the betrayal and theft of S.H.I.E.L.D by HYDRA. Even people he fought with and trusted to have his back, like Rumlow, betrayed him. Steve has lost his faith in institutions (and no one should trust the UN anyway) which is a reasonable thing, but he has kept his faith in people, as he said in his note to Tony at the end, which means he's now of the mindset that Tony started out the MCU in. The Avenger Parents (Clint and Natasha) probably agreed when the Accords were first suggested that they had to be on opposing sides for this battle so that they could try to keep the conflict from spiraling out of control. That was seen in their fight at the airport (and Wanda's chastisement of Clint for pulling his punches) and the decision that Natasha made in the hangar. She never changed sides, she simply tried to mitigate the damage by recognizing that the person Steve and Bucky were after was the bigger threat. Wanda is, by far, the most powerful hero we've seen at this point, but they've done a great job in preventing her from just being a cheat code by making her so very human with all the fears and foibles of normal humans. And the destruction of Rumlow's explosion had to be extra devastating for her because it was in many ways very similar to the events that left her and her brother as orphans, but this time it felt like it was her fault and she was the villain, at least in her mind. Elizabeth Olsen is a great actor who played Wanda so well. And, in a great psychological twist, there were no real 'villains' in this movie, just a variety of people who had been badly hurt doing awful things to try to badly hurt others that they blamed for their suffering. From Charlie's mother at the start all the way to Tony's attacks on Bucky at the end, it was just pain lashing out. Zemo was the most villainous of the bunch, but he had lost everything and he couldn't handle the loss. I'm not sure who could have suffered what he did and remain sane. The inclusion of Spider-Man, who took his turn as an Avenger in the comics, was unexpected and very fun. They played him perfectly as the teen kid just trying to do good for the people he's admired and looked up to and to not embarrass himself in the process. So well done. I also liked his allusion to Ant-Man when trying to make his Aunt think that he'd just been in a neighborhood fight: "His friend was big, I mean BIG." I laughed out loud at that the first time I saw the movie. Such an awesome movie!
I think of the Avengers like police or fire departments. They can't wait for approval - they have to react immediately. But they are also responsible to civil authorities, like the elected city or county officials, if they make mistakes. On the whole, the Avengers have done more good than harm. But SHIELD used to have civilian oversight - the shadowy board that Nick Fury reported to. Once SHIELD fell, there was nobody. A UN panel would make some sense, but they would have to be able to decide quickly when something comes up.
With as much dumb hate as Marvel movies get (not just now, but back then as well), it's so fun and refreshing to see someone actually ENJOYING them, rather than jumping on the idiotic hate train :-) Also, in regards to your comment about this feeling like an Avengers movie: when it came out, a lot of people referred to it as 'Avengers 2.5'!
Steve's point wasn't just about Bucky. We've already seen what happens when you put an international committee in charge (see Captain America the Winter Soldier). I'm on Steve's side in that - committees in general are useless at best.
The major thing that made me agree with Steve was the reminder that people like these putting pressure to sign the Accords were the ones to order a missile strike on a very heavily populated metropolis.
welcome to Phase 3..oh, you're gonna love phase 3..this one is a gem..one of the best..the theme, the point of views, the struggles, the choice, the teams, fight scenes and the plot twist..just incredible.. anyways..great reaction..next are Dr Strange, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2, Spiderman Homecoming, Thor: Ragnarok, Black Panther..then Avengers: Infinity War..can't wait..
I do wish Spider-Man was introduced a littler earlier but with Sony owning the rights Marvel didn't really have a choice on when they could use him. Andrew Garfield of The Amazing Spider-Man films could've been the MCU Spider-Man as the Oscorp Tower featured in The Amazing Spider-Man (2012) could've been added to the Manhattan Skyline in The Avengers (2012) connecting them both together. Marvel then tried to have Avengers Tower (Age of Ultron version) be added to The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014) but again this never happened. So as love as I love the MCU Spider-Man movies and this version of Peter Parker we just never really got a good chance to see him be the solo Spider-Man we see in the comic's and other Spider-Man movies. We get a 15 year old Peter Parker who has only been active as Spider-Man for a few month pushed into the world of The Avengers from the beginning. Tony makes him his first suit, that is by far the most advance starting suit for any version of Peter Parker's Spider-Man. He is then brought into a conflict between the Avengers and is also mentors by Tony Stark giving him a massive head start in his Spider-Man journey. So it's a very interesting take on Spider-Man compared to other renditions where Spider-Man is pretty alone throughout high school and his college years with only Aunt May and his friends being there for him. His classic Spider-Man suit was commissioned by a TV producer who watched Peter wresting for money in his homemade suit. This commissioned suit was just made of fabric, nothing special. It wasn't until Peter got into his 20s that he started to get better equipment. I personally would've loved at least one Spider-Man movie before Civil War.
Ok but you do realize, he's pretty much starting from scratch because of the last movie right ? Nobody knows him, he made his own suit, he's now just a young man, on his own
43:40 "There was a theme. They saved the world but there's so much that gets destroyed and so many people that die. We just don't go over it because there are victims." OK, think of it this way. You're at a party with a bunch of friends. 10 of you having a good time. I walk in and throw a couple hand grenades right in the middle of all of you. You're the only one who sees me coming and you shout "Run" and even push some of your friends to safety. But, one friend dies. Who is at fault for your dead friend? Me? You? This movie wants to act like it's your fault for not saving all 10 of you. Your fault. You let that one friend die. Wrong! it's my fault for being an evil murderer. So all these people are idiotically angry at the Avengers because evil murderers, most notably Loki and Ultron, but also many others, have caused the deaths of thousands of people. That's right. The evil murderers are the ones who caused those deaths. Not the Avengers. And while thousands died, billions were saved. Saved by the Avengers. You said "We just don't go over it because there are victims" Victims of whom? Who killed them? Not the Avengers. But everybody is moronically blaming them because they can't blame the dead or missing villains. That's as dumb as if your dead friend's sister blamed you for not saving her instead of blaming me for throwing the grenade that killed her. And the worst part is that half of the Avengers thought it was the right thing too. I just cannot accept this idiotic premise. In my mind, as fun and exciting as the fight scenes are, the idiotic writing is the low point of the first three phases.
YES! The Sokovia Accords are utterly wrong! And unconstitutional in the US. Ross belongs in prison for all the evil stuff he's done, not in the position of Secretary of State. That he's not in prison may be evidence that Hydra is still thoroughly infiltrating the US government. Ross is the longest-running villain in the MCU. And yes, the premise here is indeed idiotic. And inconsistent with what we already saw in earlier movies. It was a UN bureaucracy that wanted to nuke New York. The people of New York were happy that the Avengers saved them. Nobody blamed the Avengers for the alien invasion. You'd have to be extremely stupid to do so! And in Iron Man 2, Tony understands full well not to hand over his power to the government. Here, he seems to forget that. You and I may be in the minority, but I prefer movies that make sense.
I was 100% on Team cap side. Keeping check by the government. We knew from the second captain america films how many hydra people were in the government. 100% team cap.
I’m a huge fan of the comic book storyline, and even though I could see both sides of the argument, I fell on Cap’s team, which I still did in the movie. I know that there are many reasons why they couldn’t make the movie close to the comic books, but I still wish that they had done more with the story, characters, etc. The big fight at the airport looked pretty sparse with so few characters being involved, and having some more would’ve been nice.
I mean... at this point in Marvel these were everyone they had except for Thor and Hulk. They even brought in Black Panther and Spider-Man for it who didn't have their own solo movies yet.
@@sithlordkaeyl21 are you of the opinion that this movie should've came later in the timeline so more characters would've been available for the airport scene?
People really exaggerate about the accords... Obviously it would've been protocols of in which scenario they'd had permission to act immediately,the entire thing about working under supervision doesn't mean that they need to wait for a whole panel to reunite so they can have a debate,it's about the panel (from which the avengers were part of thanks to Tony helping to write the accords) would put rules... like "hey don't take my militarized jet and equipment to break borders hiding information about potential terrorist attacks from the local authorities to right after blow a building an go back home without even helping to clean...) war machine worked with those rules pretty much always and nobody bothered because he was always available, even being him the one sent after Steve in Germany...
You know what Natashas power is? Go back and look at all of her appearances, shes never failed a mission. Give her a task or a mission, she gets it done. Doesn't matter what it is. Edit - well now that I think of it, she did fail 1 mission, but you never see it on screen.
TRIVIA: 1. The film's release year coincides with the 75th anniversary of Captain America, the 50th anniversary of Black Panther and the 10th anniversary of the Civil War event. 2. Sharon's eulogy is a verbatim quote by Captain America from Amazing Spider-Man 537 which, in turn, is based on sentiments expressed by Mark Twain in his essay "In A Republic, Who Is The Country?". 3. When Bucky wrests a motorcycle from under its rider and climbs aboard it during the freeway chase, the stunt was accomplished practically without use of CGI! 4. Chris Evans knew the helicopter wrangling scene was going to be used to promote the film and vigorously pumped iron for hours prior to shooting what he called his 'bicep porn' money shot. The angle he was positioned in as well as the considerable strain of flexing his arm to generate the huge bulge seen in the movie caused injury to his muscle. 5. Tony's "Underoos" summons of Spider-Man is in reference to a 1977 underwear line that featured superheroes on them the most popular of which was Spider-Man. 6. The female super-soldier in Siberia is played by Heidi Moneymaker who has been Scarlett Johansson's stunt double since "Iron Man 2". EASTER EGGS: 1. At the press conference held upon Tony's return from Afghanistan in "Iron Man", he opens with the line, "I never got to say goodbye to my father." During the B.A.R.F. holographic re-enactment of his parents' departure, Maria tells Tony to "say goodbye to your father" demonstrating the therapeutic use of the technology to achieve closure as well as recalling for the audience Tony's regret. 2. When Black Widow quips to Bucky that he could at least recognize her, she is referring to in-Universe encounters like the Odessa mission and the events of "The Winter Soldier" but it is also a nod to their comic book history for fans who are aware that the Winter Soldier trained the Black Widows. 3. When Ant-Man perches on the tip of Hawkeye's arrow awaiting to be sent into flight, the image is a direct reference to the cover art of Avengers 223! 4. 'Redwing' is what Sam calls his drone but, in the comics, Falcon is accompanied by an actual falcon called Redwing with whom he shares a telepathic link! 5. Steve exhaustedly tells Tony that he "can do this all day" during their final duel as a callback to his defiant boast against the back alley bully in "The First Avenger". CAMEOS: 1. Co-director Joe Russo appears as the slain psychiatrist Dr. Theo Broussard who is impersonated by Zemo. 2. Stan Lee appears as a FedEx delivery man carrying a package containing a flip phone programmed with Cap's contact number which he misreads as being addressed to Tony STANK. END-CREDIT SCENES: 1. In a state-of-the-art cryogenic facility, Bucky agrees to be frozen until he can be safely deprogrammed. Cap thanks T'Challa for offering his friend refuge but warns him that he may be leaving his nation vulnerable to anyone who might be seeking The Winter Soldier. The prince confidently replies, "Let them try.", as they look out the window onto the dense jungle of Wakanda above which towers a giant sculpture of Bast, the Panther Goddess. 2. In their Queens apartment, Aunt May tends to Peter's bruises as he downplays the fracas as a local run-in all the while concealing the smart suit's holographic menu display complete with Spider signal which he triggered on the web-shooter. The next chronological stop in the MCU are Episodes 20-22 of Season 3 of "Agents of SHIELD" which conclude the third season of the show followed by the film "Black Widow" MINUS the end-credit scene set in 2024. "Black Widow" begins after the scene where Tony warns her that Ross is coming to arrest her. Hey, Evie! "Captain America: Civil War" is the jewel in the MCU's crown. It is also my favorite MCU movie. Although it is the third Captain America entry, this chapter in the saga is more of an Avengers-level event involving every major character except Thor, Hulk and Fury while introducing three new players into the mix including the team's most subtle and successful antagonist to date! The plot is loosely based on the landmark 2006 Marvel event comic "Civil War" by writer Mark Millar and artist Steve McNiven which saw the superhero community split ideologically into two factions led by Iron Man and Captain America over the Superhuman Registration Act following an unintentional incident of mass destruction with many civilian casualties perpetrated by well-meaning super-powered individuals. The government-sponsored Act requires registration of anyone with powers into a database for purposes of surveillance and accountability which, in some cases, means unmasking heroes with secret identities. In the film, the UN issues the Sokovia Accords subjecting the Avengers to international oversight in the wake of the chaos they've unleashed during their heroic exploits in Monaco, New Mexico, New York, Greenwich, Washington, D.C., Johannesburg, Seoul, Sokovia and, at the story's outset, in Lagos, Nigeria. The thought-provoking script presents two equally valid arguments the audience must wrestle with as much as the characters do culminating with a shattering revelation that irrevocably alters the MCU's status quo. The final, sobering twist of both comic and movie is that the victor wins the war but loses the argument. On the page, Cap wins but realizes the cost of victory and surrenders only to be assassinated. On the screen, Tony's legal victory results in the team's dissolution. Co-directors Joe and Anthony Russo return from "The Winter Soldier" bringing the grounded, gritty tonality of that film to this massive enterprise. The duo excel at staging intense and kinetic action sequences which, in this movie, all seem to unfold in two parts such as the Nigerian skirmish with Rumlow outside the lab and within the bazaar, the Romanian takedown of Bucky in the stairwell and on the freeway, the Austrian breakout of the Winter Soldier in the lobby and on the helipad, and the Siberian duel between Cap and Tony in the silo shaft and at its base. I love how the directors took pains to recreate the iconic image from the comic event of Iron Man firing his repulsors full-blast at Captain America bracing himself behind his shield. The incredible centerpiece at the German airport, though, outclasses them all and is arguably the best superhero fight ever seen in cinema as the Avengers split down the middle and engage in an all-out battle royale! Taking a page from the "X-Men" films, the combat in this sequence is predicated on coordinating and nullifying powers. Cap's strategic acumen also stands in bold relief against Tony's attempt at intimidation. Stark relies utterly on having the most sophisticated tech and the biggest guns yet Steve neatly outmaneuvers him at every turn! The screenplay by Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely elegantly advances plot and develops character in each of those set pieces but also includes fantastic dialogue during expository scenes like Ross' ultimatum, the team's debate, Tony's olive branch, Zemo's monologue and the Panther's magnificently dignified introspection about vengeance. The cast is sprawling pulling from all the franchises to date except "Guardians of the Galaxy". Chris Evans returns as Steve Rogers aka Captain America whose motives are somewhat tainted this time around. He is joined by Sebastian Stan as James Buchanan 'Bucky' Barnes aka The Winter Soldier, Anthony Mackie as Sam Wilson aka Falcon, Emily VanCamp as Peggy Carter's niece, Sharon Carter aka Agent 13, Elizabeth Olsen as Wanda Maximoff aka Scarlet Witch and Frank Grillo as a maimed Brock Rumlow aka Crossbones. Robert Downey, Jr. returns as a Pepper-less Tony Stark aka Iron Man burdened with more guilt than ever. He is joined by Don Cheadle as Col. James 'Rhodey' Rhodes aka War Machine, Scarlett Johansson as Natasha Romanoff aka Black Widow, Paul Bettany as Vision, Kerry Condon as FRIDAY and John Slattery as the elder Howard Stark. Johansson leaves the proceedings three-quarters of the way through to begin her own personal adventure in "Black Widow"! Initially introduced in "Thor", Jeremy Renner returns as Clint Barton aka Hawkeye, the sole representative of that franchise. Paul Rudd returns as Scott Lang aka Ant-Man from his own film only to unveil a second alter-ego, Giant Man! Returning from "The Incredible Hulk" is William Hurt as General Thaddeus 'Thunderbolt' Ross now in the role of Secretary of State. Chadwick Boseman is introduced as T'Challa aka Black Panther who emerges as the true hero of the piece. He is joined by John Kani as his father, King T'Chaka, Florence Kasumba as Ayo, one of his Dora Milaje, and Martin Freeman as CIA Agent Everett Ross. Tom Holland is introduced as Peter Parker aka Spider-Man with Marisa Tomei as the youngest version of Aunt May Parker yet. Daniel Bruhl slyly slinks his way through the film until his grand scheme is revealed as master manipulator Baron Helmut Zemo, here reframed as an ex-Sokovian intelligence officer. Two veteran actresses play mothers who alter Tony's trajectory at critical points in the story: Hope Davis portrays his mom, Maria Stark, while Alfre Woodard portrays grieving mom Miriam Spencer who saddles Stark with a major guilt trip. Gene Farber plays the Soviet-embedded Hydra Colonel Karpov who once served as the Winter Soldier's handler. In a bit part, Jim Rash of "Community" plays a wheedling MIT faculty member.
Cap side is the only right side. Stark has no point. Its just nonsensical emotions. A self-serving government VS the Avengers. I'm choosing Ave. Politicians are corrupt and wicked. Its like people completely forgot winter soldier. Under government control the avengers are weak an ineffectual. They can't do what's needed and will be used as a weapon against anyone they see fit. They won't even be able to question their missions. Their name will be a joke.
the MCU Spider-Man is loosely based off of Ultimate Spider-Man. The Ultimate universe in the comics is basically the basis of the MCU. Highly suggest those comics.
As Peggy Carter was born around 1920 or so, Sharon had to be at least her great-great-great niece. Hayley Atwell, who played Peggy, was NOT happy with the romance between Steve and Sharon. 😄
I can understand how it can be perceived as odd but he obviously had romantic feelings for Sharon before she revealed that she's Peggy's niece and it's not like all of a sudden after hearing that his attraction to Sharon would just go away.
In the comics, Sharon was Peggy's kid sister (it was retconned to niece, then grandniece). Peggy was an amnesiac at first... after recovering, she joined SHIELD and became romantically involved with Gabe Jones (one of the Howling Commandos... I always assumed Gabe was the man she referred to as her future husband in "Winter Soldier").
Both Tony and Steve had valid points of there stances. Tony wanted someone to hold the leash because in his hubris he went overboard created Ultron and it destroyed Sokovia, yes we can easily say Wanda was to blame for the vision but it was Tony who made the choice to plug the sceptre into an otherwise faulty program he never even asked input of the rest of the team he manipulated Bruce simply as a means to his end. And what does he do later he tries it again with Jarvis assuming with no cause the outcome would be different. Its a miracle Vision didn’t become another killing machine. Steve also has a point too. After Winter Soldier with SHIELD secretly being Hydra Steve no longer trusts institutions to tell him what to do if a person like Pearce can come off as a good guy with evil motives whose to say one person in this new panel won’t do the same. Few things about the movie Tony’s ‘olive branch’ was a lie. RDJ himself said Tony had no intention of following through with anything he promised Steve. He was just saying whatever he could in order to convince Steve to sign. This is confirmed in a delete scene that shows that Everett had already agreed to release Bucky into T’Challa’s custody, which Tony would know. As for Steve knowing about Bucky and Tony’s parents. The Russo brothers explain Steve’s initial answer to Tony that he genuinely was unaware of Bucky’s role in the whole thing and it was the truth. The most he knew was Hydra was behind it and that was only from what Zola said in Winter Soldier. It also wasn’t a conscious decision to keep it from Tony, he just didn’t think about it. The most Steve knew was Hydra might be involved based on Zola's word, which was before he even found out Bucky was the Winter Soldier, but that was all Steve knew for sure. Steve didn't know if Zola was just screwing with him or not until the bunker he was being honest when he said he didn't know it was Bucky he never revisited it, he never thought about it again until he saw that video. Now I am not Anti-Team Tony or Anti-Team Cap. The main reason for this is the Accords they don’t offer oversight, they offer control. The Avengers cannot make a move without asking the UN, who aren’t known for speedy decisions. How many lives do think would have been saved in previous MCU films if the Avengers had stopped to ask for permission? The Accords are a deeply flawed and unconstitutional piece of legislation that should never see the light of day and the start of a dictatorship I mean it denies people lawyers for one so that is unconstitutional as it gets. I’m anti-Accords especially when they are coming from a thoroughly corrupt man like Ross. People like to pretend what Ross did in ‘Incredible Hulk’ doesn’t count. Movie also is the MCU introduction of T’challa AKA Black Panther. I really loved how he serves as a counterpoint to Tony in this movie. Like Tony he is pissed because he believes Bucky killed his dad and he will let nothing and no one get in his way for revenge. When the stuff in the bunker pops off and T’challa is confronts Zemo he has the chance to avenge his father but seeing the damage his path to revenge caused seeing how its effected the Avengers T’challa stands down and listens to reason. It was in this moment that T’challa wasn’t an impulsive prince but a wise king.
I think Stark had a guilty conscience but doesn't want to be the only one sent to his room for making a mess (he started this disaster when playing around with the Mind Stone and knowing next to nothing about it). When any force is defending an area full of civilians, there's going to be unavoidable collateral damage. The only thing one can do is try to keep it to a minimum by evacuating as many as possible if possible. It's all about the math: sadly, better to have only a few hundred perish than an entire city of millions. As I mentioned in another comment, if the Avengers (or any superhero, for that matter) went back to the scene of the disaster, helped clean up, and make some kind of restitution to the wounded and grieving families, there would be little need to put them all on a leash. Secretary Ross uses a very bad analogy when he compares Thor and Banner to misplaced nuclear weapons; nuclear weapons do not have a free will of their own. And if both just happen to be on the other side of the galaxy, so much the better, right? To me, the Sokovia Accords is a sort of punishment for the collateral damage caused while good people were defending against an evil incursion that would have inflicted worse damage (Loki - world domination, Ultron - human extinction, Rumlow - pandemic). The Avengers are superheroes, not attack dogs that need to be kept on a chain until needed. Ironically, in "Iron Man 2", Congress made an attempt put Stark and Iron Man under government control but Stark loquaciously responded with a "Not no, but hell no." Apparently it wasn't good for Iron Man then but it's okay for the Avengers now. I'm on Rogers' side, and I think Stark is looking for an easy out for the horrific judgement he used (or didn't use) regarding Ultron. An interesting (and somewhat humorous) note: Sam says "I better not look out the window and see anybody flying around in that." Didn't he, Captain America, and Black Widow steal that in "The Winter Soldier"? From the military?! "Aunt May is hot." NO DOUBT!!! 😛 ❤❤❤
Welcome to Phase 3. Your in for something major transitions. From here to the end of The Infinity Saga. These next movies will change everything. RIP to Chadwick Boseman (T'Challa/Black Panther) & William Hurt (Thaddeus Ross).
She's absolutely right! Stark is the blame for the death of her son. He should have never gotten involved and just let Ultron wipe out all life on the planet. And the Steve/Sharon thing is just wrong. I mean he almost went on a date with her Aunt Pegg
@@MoMoMyPup10 Yeah. And yet, i said both things. If I told you "I like ham sandwiches and your house is on fire", would you burn to death because the sandwich part was definitive?
@@MoMoMyPup10 Listen. First you white-knighted Evie over a casual comment where I named the missing Avengers and agreed with her sentiment. Now we're sparring about it. Let's just call it a draw and movie on.
Hey, Evie! The next chronological stop in the MCU is "Black Widow" MINUS the end-credit scene set in 2024. "Black Widow" begins after the scene where Tony warns her that Ross is coming to arrest her. "Black Panther" occurs a WEEK after "Civil War", "Spider-Man: Homecoming" occurs TWO MONTHS after "Civil War" and the back-half of "Doctor Strange" occurs the following year in 2017 with "Thor: Ragnarok" occurring later that year. "Ant-Man and the Wasp" occurs just days BEFORE "INFINITY WAR" in 2018 and can also be seen before it so long as you DO NOT VIEW the end-credit scenes much like "Black Widow". The end-credit scenes for "Ant-Man and the Wasp" can be seen AFTER "INFINITY WAR". The movies can be seen in this more accurate order WITHOUT SPOILING ANYTHING. Just so you are aware, director James Gunn has stated that "Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2" occurs just months after "Guardians of the Galaxy" in 2014 meaning they're both set BEFORE "Avengers: Age of Ultron" in 2015. If not seen in its proper chronological place, it can be seen at any time before "INFINITY WAR". I recommend you see it next as it occurs chronologically in 2014. As "Venom: Let There Be Carnage" partially occurs in the MCU, you might consider pairing the first "Venom" with the first MCU Spider-Man film, "Homecoming". Recommended sequence: Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (2014)-->Black Widow-->Black Panther-->Spider-Man: Homecoming-->Venom [MCU-adjacent]-->Doctor Strange-->Thor: Ragnarok-->Ant-Man and the Wasp-->INFINITY WAR-->Captain Marvel-->ENDGAME NO END-CREDITS for "Ant-Man and the Wasp" until AFTER "INFNITY WAR". NO END-CREDITS for "Black Widow" until AFTER "ENDGAME" ideally after "Falcon and the Winter Soldier". This is a RECOMMENDED ROAD MAP to efficiently guide you through Marvel content through the next interlude. The last OPTIONAL interlude were the SIX SPIDER-MAN films. This OPTIONAL interlude covers the THIRTEEN X-MEN films. OPTIONAL MCU-ADJACENT content is in parentheses. Feel free to explore and enjoy! 2014 1. I Am Groot: Groot's First Steps, The Little Guy, Groot Takes a Bath, Are You My Groot?, Groot's Snow Day [after GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY] 2. GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY VOL. 2 + Guardians' Inferno Music Video 3. I Am Groot: Groot's Pursuit, Groot Noses Around, Groot's Sweet Treat, Magnum Opus, Groot and the Great Prophecy [before the Groot end-credit scene] 2016 4. BLACK WIDOW [minus end-credit scene best left until after "Falcon and Winter Soldier"] 5. BLACK PANTHER 6. SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING 7. (VENOM) [MCU-adjacent] 2017 8. DOCTOR STRANGE 9. THOR: RAGNAROK 2018 10. ANT-MAN AND THE WASP [minus end-credit scenes best left until after INFINITY WAR] 11. AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR 12. CAPTAIN MARVEL [only an end-credit scene is set in 2018] 13. AVENGERS: ENDGAME [begins in 2018] (X-MEN INTERPHASE INTERLUDE) 14. (X-Men) 15. (X2: X-Men United) 16. (X3: The Last Stand) 17. (X-Men Origins: Wolverine) 18. (X-Men: First Class) 19. (The Wolverine: Extended Edition) 20. (X-Men: Days of Future Past: Rogue Cut) 21. (X-Men: Apocalypse) 22. (X-Men: Dark Phoenix) 23. (Deadpool) 24. (New Mutants) 25. (Logan) 26. (Deadpool 2)
You know why I'd always side with captain america in this debate? Being in check, literally means giving full control of the avengers, to the dude who decided to launch a nuke on new york. Does anyone really believe, that ROSS, is more qualified on saving human lives, after that? How does TONY think that's a good idea? If they were already "in check", Ross would've said, get out of there, there's a nuke, and instead of killing the entire alien armada, they'd be forced to abandon new york, see it get nuked, and the portal would still be there, the aliens would still be pouring through, so many more would die. And people like that mother, guilt tripping Tony by telling him her son is dead. I HATE people who blame others, like it's their fault, when they are doing the best they can.
Yes. Ross is the longest-running villain in the MCU. Everything he does is wrong, evil, and stupid. The fact that he's put in the position of Secretary of State instead of prison strongly suggests to me that Hydra still has a lot of people in the US government.
"With great power comes great responsibility." - Uncle Ben Parker "Avengers: Civil War" addresses the fundamental question of power: If you have great power, should you do whatever you want with it, or should you submit to a higher authority? Who are you to play god? Steve Rogers wanted total freedom to go anywhere and do whatever he wanted with no accountability. Tony Stark/Secretary Ross wanted to control everyone and decide (perhaps unethically) where the Avengers should go and fight. Rogers and Stark were both prideful and self-righteous. Neither could admit to being wrong.
@@Stogie2112 Do you expect Cap is gonna go around robbing banks or something? Collateral damage is invetable, the last thing they wanted is some government controlling their actions, remember Hydra?
first time watching one of your reactions, and its enjoyable to see a genuine first time experience for people watching great movies. you have a vibe and a killer smile. keep up the good work darling, ill be watching more.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
MANNN DID THIS TAKE TIME??? 🥵 finally able to get this video out!! It might feel a little bit more edited and blurry but BELIEVE ME it's really the best I could do, this video was getting claimed left right and center. It was pissing me off so much lol cause I LOVED IT! as per usual! and I'm so excited for the rest of the MCU!!
Little announcement as well, I started the subscriptions on RUclips and I just posted my first BREAKING BAD reaction in early access for members. Monetization as well as copyrights have been EXTRA hard lately and everything I try to upload gets demonetized or claimed. The subscriptions will allow me to be able to get videos out in early access for members even if they aren't monetized which you know, RUclips and Patreon are currently my job while I'm on maternity leave so putting a lot of hours in editing videos and then having them demonetized is reaaaallly frustrating and demotivating sometimes. So just putting it out there!! I'm already on Breaking Bad season 3 on Patreon but I think it's about time it makes it's debut on RUclips! (all videos will end up being public of course only they will be available for members first) ALRIGHT LOVE YAZ 🥰
You da best! Stay awesome! 😎
Evie, your reaction was awesome as usual. Sebastian Stan appreciates all your fan mail.... 😉😉
Thanks for the Hardwork Evie❤
I recall you having such a horrible time with The Winter Soldier movie. I know I speak for all your fans and subscribers when I say "THANK YOU" for your efforts and going above and beyond to entertain us all.
As far as how Cap knew about Tony’s parents-
You remember in Winter Solder when Arnim Zola was explaining to Cap how Hydra infiltrated and grew within SHIELD, that they were manipulating world events as well.
One of the newspapers that Zola puts on his screen has the headline “Howard Stark dies in automobile accident” while Zola taunts “…accidents will happen”.
So that let Cap know that Hydra was behind the death of Tony’s parents. He probably even suspected that Bucky was involved in it, but he didn’t know that part for sure, until now.
My favorite little thing about the "a pinch of paprika" is hilarious to me cause his logical mind can't compute a quantifiable amount given vague instructions. 🤣🤣🤣
I still (at 55) get confuzed how much a pinch or dash is when Cooking.......
@@CoastalNomad me too, me too....
How much flavour can a pinch of something really add to a dish? I feel like its way too little.
@@markcruz359 To give an answer that would keep Vision Baffled.... It depends on the Spice and the Quantity that you are making....... A pinch of Paprika is going to effect the flavor different in a recipe for 2 people compared to a recipe for 10 people........ A pinch of something would be more noticable in an 8 ounce batter, and less noticable in a 20 ounce batter......
@@CoastalNomad you're right. I honestly dont remember but wasn't she cooking in a pot though? Vision's not eating. She cant be cooking for herself. She must be cooking for her, Tony, Nat, Rhodey.
But yeh i suppose the bigger the batch it would affect less of the taste. But the smaller the batch might require less of it. But i would assume for a dish literally called Paprikash that it would require more than a pinch. At least a tablespoon.
They've fought aliens, Hydra, Loki, and an army of murderbots. But the Avengers are defeated by a man with a high skill set, patience, and a plan.
That's why Zemo is one of my favorite MCU villains.
Zemo's plan was brilliant. Ignite the Avengers' individual egos and set them against each other.
11:00 The thing they gloss over is that they were going to drop a nuke on New York in order to stop Loki and the Avengers prevented the entire city from being destroyed. These are the people they're talking about who would decide when and how to deploy the Avengers.
it wasn't the UN that decided to send the nuke to New York, it was SHIELD
Consider this.
Imagine if the Sarkovia Accords already existed during Age of Ultron.
I know, I know, they would have to be called something else, but assume that same law putting them under control of the UN existed during that movie.
Imagine if they waited even 5 minutes for the UN to convene an assembly and pass a resolution to send the Avengers to fight Ultron.
Ooops!
Too late.
They might be lucky enough to arrive just in time to front row seats at the end of the world.
And, realistically, the UN might not be able to get a resolution passed in 5 minutes.
Often, it takes days or weeks.
And many resolutions never pass because it requires a unanimous vote from all member countries.
All you need is one holdout that disagrees and they're stuck.
OH no, now Loki is king of Earth and has a few million Chitauri soldiers and thisps to make sure it stays that way.
Bureaucracy is no way to save lives.
Yep! It boggles my mind how anyone can think the Sokovia Accords are a good idea.
@@PhilBagels i feel like Ultron wouldn't have been a thing if the Accords were in place
@@Ahahabih416 I'm not so sure. The Sokovia Accords don't seem to place any restrictions on Tony developing technology.
"Man, this is no fun. I'm having a terrible time." -- Best line of the Day. 👍👍
The Captain America movies are such masterpieces. All of them are just a notch above the rest of the "solo" Marvel movies.
I absolutely agree!
My favorite thing about this is the way each "side" has their respective dork, and they're both attempting to impress their team leader. Ant-Man is sitting here trying to impress Captain America, while Peter is trying to impress Tony. They're both goofy as hell!
In battle there is often collatoral damage. Wanda's parents were collatoral damage and she couldn't accept that it can be that easy to dismiss. Now she's caused people to die as collatoral damage. We and the Avengers can forgive her, but to her, she became exactly what she raged against.
40:35 "This is no fun"
Exactly😢
On paper, seeing superheroes duking it out should be awesome and a good time.
But these Characters are friends. This shouldn't be happening. We CARE about them and what this conflict did to them.
That's great storytelling.
This film is loosely based on Civil War (2006) a comic book that opened with The New Warriors (B & C List Hero's) battle a group of villains in Stamford, Connecticut, while filming a reality television show. Nitro who is basically a living bomb explodes, killing more than 600 people. This includes school children, Unfortunately at the last minute Nitro was thrown into a school bus just packed outside the playground of a school. All The New Warriors die as well except a character called Speedball.
The rest of the superheroes appear in Stamford to search for survivors, from The X-Men, Avengers, Fantastic Four etc. The Superhero Registration Act comes into play with many hero's agreeing to sign after what happened in Stamford while other hero's decide not to sign as that would mean registering with the federal government as a "human weapon of mass destruction," reveal their true identity to the authorities, and undergo training. Iron man is pro signing while Captain America is anti signing. Iron Man has the backing of S.H.I.E.L.D. while Captain America actually had S.H.I.E.L.D. soldiers follow him creating a divide between S.H.I.E.L.D. as well.
Peter Parker who just got a new fancy Iron Spider suit from Tony decides to join Iron Man's side and even reveals his identity to the public. In the end Peter decides to switch sides to Captain America. In the end Captain America is taken into S.H.I.E.L.D. custody where he is assassinated on order of the Red Skull, sniped by Crossbones who just happens to be the villain we see in the introduction of the film.
The MCU has The Sokovia Accords instead of the The Superhero Registration Act. Another big difference is the size roster with the comic having more hero's and teams involved compared to the much smaller number we see in the MCU. Thankfully they introduced two new hero's in this film with Spider-Man and Black Panther but it's still not close to the comic where pretty much everyone came together to fight while some hero's decided to stay out of this war all together. Alot of this has to do with Legal rights as well such as Fox owning the movie rights to X-Men and Fantastic Four for example. So the movie as a whole is more of an Avengers Civil War than a Superhero war across all parties but like the comic Iron Man and Captain America were extremely important as the leaders of both sides.
So, spoil the comics....anyway, it came out around the time the first Avengers movie came out, was it? That's why the verbal argument between Cap and Stark?
@@genghisgalahad8465 long before even the first Iron Man movie actually
@@genghisgalahad8465 Just two years before the first Iron Man (2008) and 6 years before The Avengers (2012). The Civil War comic itself was extremely beloved so I have no doubt that Kevin already had plans for a Civil War movie down the line.
@@genghisgalahad8465 if I had to guess the comic around the first Avengers movie was Fear Itself but I could be one year wrong
I still contend that "Winter Soldier" is the best Captain America movie, since this really is Avengers 2.5. Awesome flick no matter how you class it though, one of the best in the MCU.
27:48 Action sequences simply do not get much better than the "Airport Battle".🤘
I never hear anyone mention it, but while Tony is the one that opted for the Accords, ultimately he ends up trying to kill Bucky entirely out of raw emotion.
In that moment, I don’t even think the accords are a thought in his mind, illustrating just how truly useless they are, and how Steve was Right.
Nobody was completely right. The Accords were flawed but they had merit. They did need accountability. EVERYONE needs accountability. This country's government was even built on the premise of checks and balances. Whereever they went they did cause immeasurable collateral damage even if it was unintentional. Someone has to be held responsible for that.
Forget they're super heroes. Let's say that there is a bank robbery and hostages are being held. The Police use the SWAT team with an armored vehicle to break through a side wall and just start blasting everywhere to kill the robbers. They get them but they also kill half the hostages in the crossfire. Your Mother was one of those killed. They say, "Opps!!" grab what's left of the bank robbers and go back to the police station and leave all the damage to others to clean up. You cool with that?? That's what the Avengers have been doing.
By the way, that is NOT how they operated in the comics. They DID have both government funding AND oversight. They even had a Congressional representative.
@@bryce253 But there already is accountability. They're called laws. Even if you're a superhero, you're still subject to the laws of the country you are in. SWAT teams don't just start "blasting everywhere". When police make mistakes, there are already laws in place that hold them accountable. Just like if a private citizen kills someone by accident or in self-defense, or in defense of another.
If anyone in the New York City government wants to issue an arrest warrant for any or all of the Avengers because of damage done during the Chitauri invasion, they can do so. (Though, it didn't seem that anyone did.) Likewise, if the Sokovian government wanted to put Tony on trial for unleashing Ultron, they could have. And if the Brazilian government wanted General Ross held accountable for his military operation on their soil, which resulted in massive property damage and civilian casualties, they also can. Is Ross himself willing to be held accountable for any of his own idiotic and criminal actions?
In doing so, Tony becomes the type the Accords arrest
@@bryce253 But there's still going to be collateral damage even if they're sent by the counsel. It's unavoidable. No one seems to mention that either. There was never one iota of criminal intent on their part. The concept of accountability here is insane.
@@bryce253cap side is 100% right
Some of the best lines in this.
Friday- “You can’t beat him hand to hand!”
Cap: “He’s my friend “
Tony: “ So was I”
Tony: “You don’t deserve it! My father made that shield!”
T’Challa: “So I ask you. As both warrior and king. How long do you think you can keep your friend safe from me.”
"The living are not done with you yet"
26:26 The Mind Stone is indeed the source of Wanda's power.
Age of Ultron: Wanda and her brother Pietro volunteered to be test subjects for Baron von Strucker, who had Loki's scepter.
The Mind Stone somehow enabled Wanda to channel and use "chaos magic" to mess with people's minds as well as cause massive physical destruction.
In Wanda vision we saw that wand was born with chaos magic the mind stone unlocked her potential
In the comics, isn't Wanda's brother the speedster, known as quicksilver?
@@darrenbryant9253 .... Yes. In the comics, they are the children of Magneto.
@@Stogie2112 Wow. Thanks man. I wasn't sure. I definitely did not know about the Magneto angle. Very interesting.
Oh, there was one brief previous mention of Dr. Strange in the MCU, also in Winter Soldier.
When Cap and Nat are on the rooftop with Agent Sitwell, he mentions some people that Zola’s algorithm will be targeting to kill. One of the names he mentions is Dr. Strange.
One of the things that bothers me about the Secretary of Defense guilting some of the Avengers into signing the SA. I would have loved if Tony or Steve or anybody, just spoke up and said “Aren't you the person that ordered several tactical nuclear strikes against New York City?!”
25:05 "He's so young."
He always has been.
The very first time he appeared in Marvel comic books he was fifteen years old.
I think out of every MCU film to date, this is the best film at balancing multiple storylines. It had its own primary story (Cap shielding Bucky against the other Avengers) but had a lot of side stories and character development that circled around the main story.
I'm definitely on Cap's side of this. The Accords say that a multi-national government agency decides when the Avengers go in. Not only would that be a bureaucracy, but it would be one with many differing agendas. It is difficult enough now to get the US government to agree on anything, think of how it would be with multiple nations involved. Even locally, it takes time to make decisions. For example, in Malibu, CA in October, 4 students from Pepperdine University were killed by a speeding driver on Pacific Coast Highway. And crashes caused by excessive speed happen frequently on PCH. Everyone agrees that something must be done. So now, more than two full months since the accident, what has been done? The city government has commissioned a study to determine what they can do and what the state can do. Yet nothing really has been done. And that is a local and state matter. Most of the time, when the Avengers are needed, they don't have the luxury of time to conduct a study. Action is needed immediately, not several months or years from now. Would they have had time to wait for a multi-national decision when it came to the Invasion of New York by the Chitauri ("The Avengers")?
Obviously it would've been protocols of in which scenario they'd had permission to act immediately,the entire thing about working under supervision doesn't mean that they need to wait for a whole panel to reunite so they can have a debate,it's about the panel (from which the avengers were part of thanks to Tony helping to write the accords) would put rules... like "hey don't take my militarized jet and equipment to break borders hiding information about potential terrorist attacks from the local authorities to right after blow a building an go back home without even helping to clean...) war machine worked with those rules pretty much always and nobody bothered because he was always available, even being him the one sent after Steve in Germany...
What you suggest about doing something to prevent things from happening is exactly what Steve stopped in his second movie,and he could've just landed those things or said Tony to take care of his toys but instead he destroyed 'em in the air killing uncountable people... Literally how difficult it could've been to call Tony and say "yeah they wanna use your technology to kill people" and have Tony just turning them off?...
And in the avengers they was already working under supervision of Fury,who was a directive of a governmental entity...
@@S.m1115 In Winter Soldier, Stark made suggestions to the technology. He didn't control it. And in Avengers, an oversight panel decided the best option was to nuke NYC. I'm not saying the accords were a god-awful idea, but there were valid concerns
Originally, in the comics, Peter Parker makes artificial webbing and shoots it from devices that he wears on his wrists. In the Tobey Maguire films, director Sam Raimi changed it so that Peter makes organic webbing from his own body.
Maguire Spiderman will always be my favorite.
The natural webbing was awesome and made perfect sense. He's part spider!
I remember the 1970's TV Series with Nicholas Hammond, and he had web-shooters that needed capsules of fluid......
24:30 Oh yeah peter makes his own webbing that is then placed inside a cartridge that Spider-Man loads into his custom built web shooters. Toby though has organic web shooters, allowing his body to make the webs and shoot them from his wrist. But for most Spider-Man renditions across comics, animation, and movies they use the custom built web shooters. Funny enough Toby originally had the web shooters, there's footage you can find online of Peter wearing the wrist web shooters but sometime near the end of production they went with the organic web shooters instead, last minute change.
In the comics, this was a HUGE story that had far-reaching implications, and basically split the Marvel universe down the middle between Cap’s side and Tony’s side. Many characters, teams, groups, and even villains were involved in the fight against each other, except the really powerful characters.
30:45 As incredible as this fight is, and as much damage as it's causing, think what it would look like if _Hulk_ or _Thor_ were present.
only issue is both of them would've been Team Cap and a team with Wanda, Thor, & Hulk wipes the floor with Team Iron Man
5:15 "She saved him but I guess that was a little mmmm."
She saved a hundred bystanders too.
What she did was right, but it's also highly visible and destructive.
Or, maybe she could have moved it up AND away from the building. Hard to tell.
Yeah, a lot more people would have died in the open air market than died in the building, if she hadn't moved the explosion. And maybe she couldn't quite control her power to contain the explosion as long as she wanted. Has she ever contained an explosion before? Plus the tactical inexperience. But how do you get experience using a superpower that no one has ever had before? I think she was trying to movie the explosion straight up - even higher than the building - way up in the sky, where it wouldn't have hurt anyone, but she only got it part way up when she lost containment.
11:40 "Can't we just do a trial before making it official?"
Ahhh, so young.
No.
Definitely not.
When you give up your rights to a government, they never give them back without a huge fight.
Fight for your rights BEFORE they take them away from you, not after.
The masterpiece of this movie is that you can see both sides.
The Irony are the Roll Reversals Tony/Steve took. The Soldier chooses Freedom of Action, While the Industrialist chooses Government Oversight.
TRUST ME, Things will get much better AND much worse, But the ride keeps on getting better and better!
8:08 This is so wrong, what he's doing, here. He's trying to illustrate the Avengers as a threat to public safety by using footage of them actually fighting a dangerous _incursion._
For the events of the Age of Ultron , Stark is the one that caused all of it. Ultron was his fault so any death was on his shoulders, thats why he was so promt to be in check. the New York thing was out of their control , same as winter soldier events, but Ultron has a big oops and haunted Stark .
He also admitted he thought the Accords would help save his relationship with Pepper...
7:10 "I think I see a theme."
In some ways, I love this movie. The action is awesome.
In other ways, I think this is just about the dumbest MCU movie in all of the first 3 phases.
I mean, the Avengers have saved, by my count, approximately 20 billion people, give or take.
Yeah, a few hundred died here, a few thousand died there - and all those deaths were caused by the villains, not by the Avengers.
Even what happened with Scarlet Witch in this movie: she saved hundreds and probably only a few innocent people died.
"Victory at the expense of the innocent is no victory at all." (said by some guy in the movie on TV).
That is dead wrong.
100% wrong.
When the bad guys are murdering innocent people, THEY MUST BE STOPPED.
Yeah, you try to help the innocents get away, of course, but if the bad guys kill some before you stop them, that is the fault of the bad guys, not the heroes stopping them.
What this guy said was basically "World War 2 should never have happened. Yeah, sure, Hitler and Nazi Germany were killing millions of innocents, but the allies should have remembered my rule: Victory at the cost of innocents is no victory at all. Since there was no way to stop Nazi Germany without more innocent deaths, there was no path to victory at all, so the allied troops should have just stayed home and let Hitler do whatever he wanted."
I mean, that's basically the stupid thing this guy just said.
Worse, that is the logic this entire movie is based on: pure stupidity.
Ah, well, at least the action is good.
Indeed. What do you call a war in which innocent people die? Answer: A war.
What do you call a war in which no innocent people die? Answer: A unicorn. Because those don't exist, either.
King T'Chaka's statement is one of the dumbest things ever said. And the writers of this movie expect us to respect him?
Just an FYI they mentioned Dr strange briefly in captain America the winter soldier on the rooftop scene where they show the falcons wings for the first time but most won’t catch that. I hope you start watching these more often, phase 3 is the best by far and every film is great in this phase and you got the two best
29:20 "You have a metal _arm?!_ That is _awesome!"_
Said the high schooler while he was _overpowering_ it.
This is my fav Captain America movie. It's basically an Avenger film.
Fun watching Civil War with you, Evie. Very good insights and comments. Looking forward to the next MCU with you.
I looooved Dr. Strange!!!
Great Reaction........
In Wnter Soldier you stated "who could blame Bucky and hold him responsible for things he did while he was under"..... You did a Great Job of understanding both sides/both points of View....
One Reason I think Tony is more torn up by his mom's death, is since his dad worked for Shield, He knew he could be a target.... Tony's mom wasn't involved, so she could be viewed as an Innocent....
Also....Tony and his father were always at odds with each other. Howard was always busy and didn't spend enough time with Tony when he was a child. He always talked about Captain America, which made Tony jealous and resentful. The young adult Tony was rebellious and cold towards his father. Tony's mother was there for him, so he was naturally hurt much more when she died.
@@Stogie2112 Valid Points.....
Spider-Man doesn't shoot webing from his body in the comics it's a device he makes that he made that shoots webing
"Isn't that his girl's niece...? ...whatever, who cares"
Hi
You called..?
gosh... evie is so gorgeous without her glasses, her gorgeous blue eyes really shines.
24:43 that was totally improvised, Holland forgot he had to move and Downey needed to sit there so he improvised that line in character
I'm pretty sure Holland just sat with his legs on the bed naturally not realizing it would block RDJ from sitting, so Holland's legs weren't even supposed to be there to begin with.
Looool that’s funny!
This movie is a great example of why the Russo brothers should be handling the MCU.
7:58 The same guy who wanted to hunt down Bruce Banner and weaponize him.
You gotta check out Andrew Garfield as Spider-Man from the first remake
#TeamCap always, till the end of the line.
8:16-8:20 "If they don't do anything, it would be even worse, no?"
Now that the "genie is out of the bottle" yes.
8:23-8:26 "He's (Steve) very protective of her (Wanda)"
Steve has been there, he's seen the losses he couldn't stop. He can see she blames herself, because if she had held the explosion longer, all those people wouldn't have died. She wasn't brought up to be a protector, and she lost the only family she had by turning against Ultron. She's the new member of the family. The baby sister. She also happens to be the member of the family you want upset about as much as you want Bruce Banner (Hulk) upset. So, as my father would say "Don't poke the bear."
And at this point she's the youngest Avenger(excluding Vision) so she's actually the baby of the team. He also sees a lot of himself in her because she too agreed to be experimented on for her country in a time of war. And after Pietro died, she has nobody from before her time as an Avenger left just like him(except for Bucky) so they're both very alone outside the company of the other Avengers.
@@jaysontatum01 Steve wanted to do what is right and to protect people during WWII. In that. He has not changed.
I'm team Cap. I don't trust the UN to do anything right.
Segovia was Tony's fault, pure and simple, when he created Ultron. BTW, Tony is still suffering from PTSD. The Accords are him trying to subconsciously address his survivors guilt. Remember the nightmare Wanda planted in his head? That still haunts him.
I am in many ways a cynical person. There are few groups I trust that much. This is why I don't think the Accords would work.
Thing is, good people with good intentions support the Accords. That's what makes this an interesting movie.
Next up, Doctor Strange!
Great reaction to another great movie!
I'm completely Team Cap in this because I know that government bureaucracies and the United Nations (ha) work for their best interests and their own power, and bureaucracies are the most ineffective and expensive way to do anything, since they'll decide to waste lots of time and money "studying" a situation and by the time they come to a decision the thing that they are deciding on has already been resolved and their decision is a moot point.
It's funny, and shows the great amount of thought that went into the first three phases of the MCU, that the attitudes of Steve and Tony have completely changed by this movie. Tony knew he was the smartest man anywhere and that any decision he made would be the best one, so he refused to accept outside limitations on his life. Then the unmitigated disaster of Ultron that came from his hubris didn't just shake his self-confidence, it destroyed it. Tony no longer trusts himself so he is all for the Accords so that there's always someone keeping him from screwing up like that again (in theory).
Steve has gone from absolute trust in leadership to only trusting a very few people who have proven themselves to him, thanks to the betrayal and theft of S.H.I.E.L.D by HYDRA. Even people he fought with and trusted to have his back, like Rumlow, betrayed him. Steve has lost his faith in institutions (and no one should trust the UN anyway) which is a reasonable thing, but he has kept his faith in people, as he said in his note to Tony at the end, which means he's now of the mindset that Tony started out the MCU in.
The Avenger Parents (Clint and Natasha) probably agreed when the Accords were first suggested that they had to be on opposing sides for this battle so that they could try to keep the conflict from spiraling out of control. That was seen in their fight at the airport (and Wanda's chastisement of Clint for pulling his punches) and the decision that Natasha made in the hangar. She never changed sides, she simply tried to mitigate the damage by recognizing that the person Steve and Bucky were after was the bigger threat.
Wanda is, by far, the most powerful hero we've seen at this point, but they've done a great job in preventing her from just being a cheat code by making her so very human with all the fears and foibles of normal humans. And the destruction of Rumlow's explosion had to be extra devastating for her because it was in many ways very similar to the events that left her and her brother as orphans, but this time it felt like it was her fault and she was the villain, at least in her mind. Elizabeth Olsen is a great actor who played Wanda so well.
And, in a great psychological twist, there were no real 'villains' in this movie, just a variety of people who had been badly hurt doing awful things to try to badly hurt others that they blamed for their suffering. From Charlie's mother at the start all the way to Tony's attacks on Bucky at the end, it was just pain lashing out. Zemo was the most villainous of the bunch, but he had lost everything and he couldn't handle the loss. I'm not sure who could have suffered what he did and remain sane.
The inclusion of Spider-Man, who took his turn as an Avenger in the comics, was unexpected and very fun. They played him perfectly as the teen kid just trying to do good for the people he's admired and looked up to and to not embarrass himself in the process. So well done. I also liked his allusion to Ant-Man when trying to make his Aunt think that he'd just been in a neighborhood fight: "His friend was big, I mean BIG." I laughed out loud at that the first time I saw the movie.
Such an awesome movie!
I think of the Avengers like police or fire departments. They can't wait for approval - they have to react immediately. But they are also responsible to civil authorities, like the elected city or county officials, if they make mistakes. On the whole, the Avengers have done more good than harm. But SHIELD used to have civilian oversight - the shadowy board that Nick Fury reported to. Once SHIELD fell, there was nobody. A UN panel would make some sense, but they would have to be able to decide quickly when something comes up.
evie, at 647 , that could be black mariah, she was in the tv show, Luke Cage, she could be lying just to be trying to break up the Avengers
With as much dumb hate as Marvel movies get (not just now, but back then as well), it's so fun and refreshing to see someone actually ENJOYING them, rather than jumping on the idiotic hate train :-)
Also, in regards to your comment about this feeling like an Avengers movie: when it came out, a lot of people referred to it as 'Avengers 2.5'!
40:05 ppl be like "tony beat caps ass" like friday didn't save tony😭😂
Steve's point wasn't just about Bucky. We've already seen what happens when you put an international committee in charge (see Captain America the Winter Soldier). I'm on Steve's side in that - committees in general are useless at best.
The major thing that made me agree with Steve was the reminder that people like these putting pressure to sign the Accords were the ones to order a missile strike on a very heavily populated metropolis.
welcome to Phase 3..oh, you're gonna love phase 3..this one is a gem..one of the best..the theme, the point of views, the struggles, the choice, the teams, fight scenes and the plot twist..just incredible..
anyways..great reaction..next are Dr Strange, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2, Spiderman Homecoming, Thor: Ragnarok, Black Panther..then Avengers: Infinity War..can't wait..
great reaction, i am glad we could finally see it :) i wish you have more luck with the next mcu reactions, i am here for the next one :D
Thank you!!
Wanda is the most powerful among them by far.
Except that she can be more easily killed than the others.
Yeah she's a glass conon but with hell of a cannon part
@@MoMoMyPup10 she's easiest to kill if she doesn't see it coming but with her powers she can stop just about anything that she can see coming.
I do wish Spider-Man was introduced a littler earlier but with Sony owning the rights Marvel didn't really have a choice on when they could use him. Andrew Garfield of The Amazing Spider-Man films could've been the MCU Spider-Man as the Oscorp Tower featured in The Amazing Spider-Man (2012) could've been added to the Manhattan Skyline in The Avengers (2012) connecting them both together. Marvel then tried to have Avengers Tower (Age of Ultron version) be added to The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014) but again this never happened.
So as love as I love the MCU Spider-Man movies and this version of Peter Parker we just never really got a good chance to see him be the solo Spider-Man we see in the comic's and other Spider-Man movies. We get a 15 year old Peter Parker who has only been active as Spider-Man for a few month pushed into the world of The Avengers from the beginning. Tony makes him his first suit, that is by far the most advance starting suit for any version of Peter Parker's Spider-Man. He is then brought into a conflict between the Avengers and is also mentors by Tony Stark giving him a massive head start in his Spider-Man journey.
So it's a very interesting take on Spider-Man compared to other renditions where Spider-Man is pretty alone throughout high school and his college years with only Aunt May and his friends being there for him. His classic Spider-Man suit was commissioned by a TV producer who watched Peter wresting for money in his homemade suit. This commissioned suit was just made of fabric, nothing special. It wasn't until Peter got into his 20s that he started to get better equipment. I personally would've loved at least one Spider-Man movie before Civil War.
Ok but you do realize, he's pretty much starting from scratch because of the last movie right ? Nobody knows him, he made his own suit, he's now just a young man, on his own
@@PunishersZeroX I mean... spoilers lol
Loved your reaction. I like when people see the conflict with the accords instead of blindly picking a side.
24:30 Evie: He makes his webbings (bully maguire vibes) lolz
43:40 "There was a theme. They saved the world but there's so much that gets destroyed and so many people that die. We just don't go over it because there are victims."
OK, think of it this way.
You're at a party with a bunch of friends. 10 of you having a good time.
I walk in and throw a couple hand grenades right in the middle of all of you.
You're the only one who sees me coming and you shout "Run" and even push some of your friends to safety.
But, one friend dies.
Who is at fault for your dead friend?
Me?
You?
This movie wants to act like it's your fault for not saving all 10 of you. Your fault. You let that one friend die.
Wrong!
it's my fault for being an evil murderer.
So all these people are idiotically angry at the Avengers because evil murderers, most notably Loki and Ultron, but also many others, have caused the deaths of thousands of people.
That's right.
The evil murderers are the ones who caused those deaths.
Not the Avengers.
And while thousands died, billions were saved.
Saved by the Avengers.
You said "We just don't go over it because there are victims"
Victims of whom? Who killed them?
Not the Avengers.
But everybody is moronically blaming them because they can't blame the dead or missing villains.
That's as dumb as if your dead friend's sister blamed you for not saving her instead of blaming me for throwing the grenade that killed her.
And the worst part is that half of the Avengers thought it was the right thing too.
I just cannot accept this idiotic premise.
In my mind, as fun and exciting as the fight scenes are, the idiotic writing is the low point of the first three phases.
YES! The Sokovia Accords are utterly wrong! And unconstitutional in the US. Ross belongs in prison for all the evil stuff he's done, not in the position of Secretary of State. That he's not in prison may be evidence that Hydra is still thoroughly infiltrating the US government. Ross is the longest-running villain in the MCU.
And yes, the premise here is indeed idiotic. And inconsistent with what we already saw in earlier movies. It was a UN bureaucracy that wanted to nuke New York. The people of New York were happy that the Avengers saved them. Nobody blamed the Avengers for the alien invasion. You'd have to be extremely stupid to do so! And in Iron Man 2, Tony understands full well not to hand over his power to the government. Here, he seems to forget that.
You and I may be in the minority, but I prefer movies that make sense.
I was 100% on Team cap side. Keeping check by the government. We knew from the second captain america films how many hydra people were in the government. 100% team cap.
I’m a huge fan of the comic book storyline, and even though I could see both sides of the argument, I fell on Cap’s team, which I still did in the movie.
I know that there are many reasons why they couldn’t make the movie close to the comic books, but I still wish that they had done more with the story, characters, etc. The big fight at the airport looked pretty sparse with so few characters being involved, and having some more would’ve been nice.
I mean... at this point in Marvel these were everyone they had except for Thor and Hulk. They even brought in Black Panther and Spider-Man for it who didn't have their own solo movies yet.
@@jaysontatum01, I’m aware of that.
@@sithlordkaeyl21 are you of the opinion that this movie should've came later in the timeline so more characters would've been available for the airport scene?
@@jaysontatum01, not necessarily.
People really exaggerate about the accords...
Obviously it would've been protocols of in which scenario they'd had permission to act immediately,the entire thing about working under supervision doesn't mean that they need to wait for a whole panel to reunite so they can have a debate,it's about the panel (from which the avengers were part of thanks to Tony helping to write the accords) would put rules... like "hey don't take my militarized jet and equipment to break borders hiding information about potential terrorist attacks from the local authorities to right after blow a building an go back home without even helping to clean...) war machine worked with those rules pretty much always and nobody bothered because he was always available, even being him the one sent after Steve in Germany...
You know what Natashas power is?
Go back and look at all of her appearances, shes never failed a mission. Give her a task or a mission, she gets it done. Doesn't matter what it is.
Edit - well now that I think of it, she did fail 1 mission, but you never see it on screen.
TRIVIA:
1. The film's release year coincides with the 75th anniversary of Captain America, the 50th anniversary of Black Panther and the 10th anniversary of the Civil War event.
2. Sharon's eulogy is a verbatim quote by Captain America from Amazing Spider-Man 537 which, in turn, is based on sentiments expressed by Mark Twain in his essay "In A Republic, Who Is The Country?".
3. When Bucky wrests a motorcycle from under its rider and climbs aboard it during the freeway chase, the stunt was accomplished practically without use of CGI!
4. Chris Evans knew the helicopter wrangling scene was going to be used to promote the film and vigorously pumped iron for hours prior to shooting what he called his 'bicep porn' money shot. The angle he was positioned in as well as the considerable strain of flexing his arm to generate the huge bulge seen in the movie caused injury to his muscle.
5. Tony's "Underoos" summons of Spider-Man is in reference to a 1977 underwear line that featured superheroes on them the most popular of which was Spider-Man.
6. The female super-soldier in Siberia is played by Heidi Moneymaker who has been Scarlett Johansson's stunt double since "Iron Man 2".
EASTER EGGS:
1. At the press conference held upon Tony's return from Afghanistan in "Iron Man", he opens with the line, "I never got to say goodbye to my father." During the B.A.R.F. holographic re-enactment of his parents' departure, Maria tells Tony to "say goodbye to your father" demonstrating the therapeutic use of the technology to achieve closure as well as recalling for the audience Tony's regret.
2. When Black Widow quips to Bucky that he could at least recognize her, she is referring to in-Universe encounters like the Odessa mission and the events of "The Winter Soldier" but it is also a nod to their comic book history for fans who are aware that the Winter Soldier trained the Black Widows.
3. When Ant-Man perches on the tip of Hawkeye's arrow awaiting to be sent into flight, the image is a direct reference to the cover art of Avengers 223!
4. 'Redwing' is what Sam calls his drone but, in the comics, Falcon is accompanied by an actual falcon called Redwing with whom he shares a telepathic link!
5. Steve exhaustedly tells Tony that he "can do this all day" during their final duel as a callback to his defiant boast against the back alley bully in "The First Avenger".
CAMEOS:
1. Co-director Joe Russo appears as the slain psychiatrist Dr. Theo Broussard who is impersonated by Zemo.
2. Stan Lee appears as a FedEx delivery man carrying a package containing a flip phone programmed with Cap's contact number which he misreads as being addressed to Tony STANK.
END-CREDIT SCENES:
1. In a state-of-the-art cryogenic facility, Bucky agrees to be frozen until he can be safely deprogrammed. Cap thanks T'Challa for offering his friend refuge but warns him that he may be leaving his nation vulnerable to anyone who might be seeking The Winter Soldier. The prince confidently replies, "Let them try.", as they look out the window onto the dense jungle of Wakanda above which towers a giant sculpture of Bast, the Panther Goddess.
2. In their Queens apartment, Aunt May tends to Peter's bruises as he downplays the fracas as a local run-in all the while concealing the smart suit's holographic menu display complete with Spider signal which he triggered on the web-shooter.
The next chronological stop in the MCU are Episodes 20-22 of Season 3 of "Agents of SHIELD" which conclude the third season of the show followed by the film "Black Widow" MINUS the end-credit scene set in 2024. "Black Widow" begins after the scene where Tony warns her that Ross is coming to arrest her.
Hey, Evie! "Captain America: Civil War" is the jewel in the MCU's crown. It is also my favorite MCU movie. Although it is the third Captain America entry, this chapter in the saga is more of an Avengers-level event involving every major character except Thor, Hulk and Fury while introducing three new players into the mix including the team's most subtle and successful antagonist to date! The plot is loosely based on the landmark 2006 Marvel event comic "Civil War" by writer Mark Millar and artist Steve McNiven which saw the superhero community split ideologically into two factions led by Iron Man and Captain America over the Superhuman Registration Act following an unintentional incident of mass destruction with many civilian casualties perpetrated by well-meaning super-powered individuals. The government-sponsored Act requires registration of anyone with powers into a database for purposes of surveillance and accountability which, in some cases, means unmasking heroes with secret identities. In the film, the UN issues the Sokovia Accords subjecting the Avengers to international oversight in the wake of the chaos they've unleashed during their heroic exploits in Monaco, New Mexico, New York, Greenwich, Washington, D.C., Johannesburg, Seoul, Sokovia and, at the story's outset, in Lagos, Nigeria. The thought-provoking script presents two equally valid arguments the audience must wrestle with as much as the characters do culminating with a shattering revelation that irrevocably alters the MCU's status quo. The final, sobering twist of both comic and movie is that the victor wins the war but loses the argument. On the page, Cap wins but realizes the cost of victory and surrenders only to be assassinated. On the screen, Tony's legal victory results in the team's dissolution.
Co-directors Joe and Anthony Russo return from "The Winter Soldier" bringing the grounded, gritty tonality of that film to this massive enterprise. The duo excel at staging intense and kinetic action sequences which, in this movie, all seem to unfold in two parts such as the Nigerian skirmish with Rumlow outside the lab and within the bazaar, the Romanian takedown of Bucky in the stairwell and on the freeway, the Austrian breakout of the Winter Soldier in the lobby and on the helipad, and the Siberian duel between Cap and Tony in the silo shaft and at its base. I love how the directors took pains to recreate the iconic image from the comic event of Iron Man firing his repulsors full-blast at Captain America bracing himself behind his shield. The incredible centerpiece at the German airport, though, outclasses them all and is arguably the best superhero fight ever seen in cinema as the Avengers split down the middle and engage in an all-out battle royale! Taking a page from the "X-Men" films, the combat in this sequence is predicated on coordinating and nullifying powers. Cap's strategic acumen also stands in bold relief against Tony's attempt at intimidation. Stark relies utterly on having the most sophisticated tech and the biggest guns yet Steve neatly outmaneuvers him at every turn! The screenplay by Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely elegantly advances plot and develops character in each of those set pieces but also includes fantastic dialogue during expository scenes like Ross' ultimatum, the team's debate, Tony's olive branch, Zemo's monologue and the Panther's magnificently dignified introspection about vengeance.
The cast is sprawling pulling from all the franchises to date except "Guardians of the Galaxy". Chris Evans returns as Steve Rogers aka Captain America whose motives are somewhat tainted this time around. He is joined by Sebastian Stan as James Buchanan 'Bucky' Barnes aka The Winter Soldier, Anthony Mackie as Sam Wilson aka Falcon, Emily VanCamp as Peggy Carter's niece, Sharon Carter aka Agent 13, Elizabeth Olsen as Wanda Maximoff aka Scarlet Witch and Frank Grillo as a maimed Brock Rumlow aka Crossbones. Robert Downey, Jr. returns as a Pepper-less Tony Stark aka Iron Man burdened with more guilt than ever. He is joined by Don Cheadle as Col. James 'Rhodey' Rhodes aka War Machine, Scarlett Johansson as Natasha Romanoff aka Black Widow, Paul Bettany as Vision, Kerry Condon as FRIDAY and John Slattery as the elder Howard Stark. Johansson leaves the proceedings three-quarters of the way through to begin her own personal adventure in "Black Widow"! Initially introduced in "Thor", Jeremy Renner returns as Clint Barton aka Hawkeye, the sole representative of that franchise. Paul Rudd returns as Scott Lang aka Ant-Man from his own film only to unveil a second alter-ego, Giant Man! Returning from "The Incredible Hulk" is William Hurt as General Thaddeus 'Thunderbolt' Ross now in the role of Secretary of State. Chadwick Boseman is introduced as T'Challa aka Black Panther who emerges as the true hero of the piece. He is joined by John Kani as his father, King T'Chaka, Florence Kasumba as Ayo, one of his Dora Milaje, and Martin Freeman as CIA Agent Everett Ross. Tom Holland is introduced as Peter Parker aka Spider-Man with Marisa Tomei as the youngest version of Aunt May Parker yet. Daniel Bruhl slyly slinks his way through the film until his grand scheme is revealed as master manipulator Baron Helmut Zemo, here reframed as an ex-Sokovian intelligence officer. Two veteran actresses play mothers who alter Tony's trajectory at critical points in the story: Hope Davis portrays his mom, Maria Stark, while Alfre Woodard portrays grieving mom Miriam Spencer who saddles Stark with a major guilt trip. Gene Farber plays the Soviet-embedded Hydra Colonel Karpov who once served as the Winter Soldier's handler. In a bit part, Jim Rash of "Community" plays a wheedling MIT faculty member.
37:50 - He knows, Cap. America and the winter soldier movie
Remember that line,
“Hawkeye: My name is Clint”
“Black Panther: I don’t care”
Smooth editing!!
25:14 not something I needed to realize today...
Sorry🫣
@@eviereacts No worries, I'll just take my cane and hobble my old bones to the cemetery so they won't have to carry me far!
Love this movie💜💜
Cap side is the only right side. Stark has no point. Its just nonsensical emotions. A self-serving government VS the Avengers. I'm choosing Ave. Politicians are corrupt and wicked. Its like people completely forgot winter soldier. Under government control the avengers are weak an ineffectual. They can't do what's needed and will be used as a weapon against anyone they see fit. They won't even be able to question their missions. Their name will be a joke.
21:22 Bucky: "Ahh! Too _sexy!"_
Your face when Cap is holding back the chopper lol😂 🤤🤗
I was caught off guard😳
the MCU Spider-Man is loosely based off of Ultimate Spider-Man. The Ultimate universe in the comics is basically the basis of the MCU. Highly suggest those comics.
Beautiful reaction and edit 🙂
As Peggy Carter was born around 1920 or so, Sharon had to be at least her great-great-great niece.
Hayley Atwell, who played Peggy, was NOT happy with the romance between Steve and Sharon. 😄
I can understand how it can be perceived as odd but he obviously had romantic feelings for Sharon before she revealed that she's Peggy's niece and it's not like all of a sudden after hearing that his attraction to Sharon would just go away.
In the comics, Sharon was Peggy's kid sister (it was retconned to niece, then grandniece). Peggy was an amnesiac at first... after recovering, she joined SHIELD and became romantically involved with Gabe Jones (one of the Howling Commandos... I always assumed Gabe was the man she referred to as her future husband in "Winter Soldier").
Both Tony and Steve had valid points of there stances. Tony wanted someone to hold the leash because in his hubris he went overboard created Ultron and it destroyed Sokovia, yes we can easily say Wanda was to blame for the vision but it was Tony who made the choice to plug the sceptre into an otherwise faulty program he never even asked input of the rest of the team he manipulated Bruce simply as a means to his end. And what does he do later he tries it again with Jarvis assuming with no cause the outcome would be different. Its a miracle Vision didn’t become another killing machine.
Steve also has a point too. After Winter Soldier with SHIELD secretly being Hydra Steve no longer trusts institutions to tell him what to do if a person like Pearce can come off as a good guy with evil motives whose to say one person in this new panel won’t do the same.
Few things about the movie Tony’s ‘olive branch’ was a lie. RDJ himself said Tony had no intention of following through with anything he promised Steve. He was just saying whatever he could in order to convince Steve to sign. This is confirmed in a delete scene that shows that Everett had already agreed to release Bucky into T’Challa’s custody, which Tony would know.
As for Steve knowing about Bucky and Tony’s parents. The Russo brothers explain Steve’s initial answer to Tony that he genuinely was unaware of Bucky’s role in the whole thing and it was the truth. The most he knew was Hydra was behind it and that was only from what Zola said in Winter Soldier. It also wasn’t a conscious decision to keep it from Tony, he just didn’t think about it. The most Steve knew was Hydra might be involved based on Zola's word, which was before he even found out Bucky was the Winter Soldier, but that was all Steve knew for sure. Steve didn't know if Zola was just screwing with him or not until the bunker he was being honest when he said he didn't know it was Bucky he never revisited it, he never thought about it again until he saw that video.
Now I am not Anti-Team Tony or Anti-Team Cap. The main reason for this is the Accords they don’t offer oversight, they offer control. The Avengers cannot make a move without asking the UN, who aren’t known for speedy decisions. How many lives do think would have been saved in previous MCU films if the Avengers had stopped to ask for permission? The Accords are a deeply flawed and unconstitutional piece of legislation that should never see the light of day and the start of a dictatorship I mean it denies people lawyers for one so that is unconstitutional as it gets. I’m anti-Accords especially when they are coming from a thoroughly corrupt man like Ross. People like to pretend what Ross did in ‘Incredible Hulk’ doesn’t count.
Movie also is the MCU introduction of T’challa AKA Black Panther. I really loved how he serves as a counterpoint to Tony in this movie. Like Tony he is pissed because he believes Bucky killed his dad and he will let nothing and no one get in his way for revenge. When the stuff in the bunker pops off and T’challa is confronts Zemo he has the chance to avenge his father but seeing the damage his path to revenge caused seeing how its effected the Avengers T’challa stands down and listens to reason. It was in this moment that T’challa wasn’t an impulsive prince but a wise king.
Hello evie. You finally made it to civil war. Its been a long 11 month journey❤
This is Avengers 2.5!
Good way to put it!
30:52 but you’re not wrong lol
I think Stark had a guilty conscience but doesn't want to be the only one sent to his room for making a mess (he started this disaster when playing around with the Mind Stone and knowing next to nothing about it).
When any force is defending an area full of civilians, there's going to be unavoidable collateral damage. The only thing one can do is try to keep it to a minimum by evacuating as many as possible if possible. It's all about the math: sadly, better to have only a few hundred perish than an entire city of millions. As I mentioned in another comment, if the Avengers (or any superhero, for that matter) went back to the scene of the disaster, helped clean up, and make some kind of restitution to the wounded and grieving families, there would be little need to put them all on a leash.
Secretary Ross uses a very bad analogy when he compares Thor and Banner to misplaced nuclear weapons; nuclear weapons do not have a free will of their own. And if both just happen to be on the other side of the galaxy, so much the better, right?
To me, the Sokovia Accords is a sort of punishment for the collateral damage caused while good people were defending against an evil incursion that would have inflicted worse damage (Loki - world domination, Ultron - human extinction, Rumlow - pandemic). The Avengers are superheroes, not attack dogs that need to be kept on a chain until needed. Ironically, in "Iron Man 2", Congress made an attempt put Stark and Iron Man under government control but Stark loquaciously responded with a "Not no, but hell no." Apparently it wasn't good for Iron Man then but it's okay for the Avengers now.
I'm on Rogers' side, and I think Stark is looking for an easy out for the horrific judgement he used (or didn't use) regarding Ultron.
An interesting (and somewhat humorous) note: Sam says "I better not look out the window and see anybody flying around in that." Didn't he, Captain America, and Black Widow steal that in "The Winter Soldier"? From the military?!
"Aunt May is hot." NO DOUBT!!! 😛
❤❤❤
Welcome to Phase 3.
Your in for something major transitions.
From here to the end of The Infinity Saga.
These next movies will change everything.
RIP to Chadwick Boseman (T'Challa/Black Panther) & William Hurt (Thaddeus Ross).
Great reaction. I love Bucky
She's absolutely right! Stark is the blame for the death of her son. He should have never gotten involved and just let Ultron wipe out all life on the planet.
And the Steve/Sharon thing is just wrong. I mean he almost went on a date with her Aunt Pegg
Ah, the good old days
You may like 'Only You' a romantic comedy from 1994 starring RDJ and Marisa Tomei.
43:15 "This kinda felt like an Avengers movie..."
Not without Thor and Bruce it isn't.
But yeah, most of them were there, and a few new friends too.
That's why she said "felt like"
@@MoMoMyPup10 And that's why I aid "yeah", because I agreed with her.
@@blakewalker84120 "Not without Thor and Bruce it isn't."
This is the definitive comment buddy, not 'yeah'
@@MoMoMyPup10 Yeah.
And yet, i said both things.
If I told you "I like ham sandwiches and your house is on fire", would you burn to death because the sandwich part was definitive?
@@MoMoMyPup10 Listen.
First you white-knighted Evie over a casual comment where I named the missing Avengers and agreed with her sentiment.
Now we're sparring about it.
Let's just call it a draw and movie on.
Zemo win at the end of the day
How?
Everyone is back in the next one
I wasn't even bothered by cap kissing the niece the thing that bothered me the most is CAP IS ALMOST 100 YEARS OLD
I think everyone said like that: this is avengers movie 😅
As long as aliens don't invade earth while the avengers are split we'll be just fine..
Hey, Evie! The next chronological stop in the MCU is "Black Widow" MINUS the end-credit scene set in 2024. "Black Widow" begins after the scene where Tony warns her that Ross is coming to arrest her. "Black Panther" occurs a WEEK after "Civil War", "Spider-Man: Homecoming" occurs TWO MONTHS after "Civil War" and the back-half of "Doctor Strange" occurs the following year in 2017 with "Thor: Ragnarok" occurring later that year. "Ant-Man and the Wasp" occurs just days BEFORE "INFINITY WAR" in 2018 and can also be seen before it so long as you DO NOT VIEW the end-credit scenes much like "Black Widow". The end-credit scenes for "Ant-Man and the Wasp" can be seen AFTER "INFINITY WAR". The movies can be seen in this more accurate order WITHOUT SPOILING ANYTHING.
Just so you are aware, director James Gunn has stated that "Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2" occurs just months after "Guardians of the Galaxy" in 2014 meaning they're both set BEFORE "Avengers: Age of Ultron" in 2015. If not seen in its proper chronological place, it can be seen at any time before "INFINITY WAR". I recommend you see it next as it occurs chronologically in 2014.
As "Venom: Let There Be Carnage" partially occurs in the MCU, you might consider pairing the first "Venom" with the first MCU Spider-Man film, "Homecoming".
Recommended sequence: Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (2014)-->Black Widow-->Black Panther-->Spider-Man: Homecoming-->Venom [MCU-adjacent]-->Doctor Strange-->Thor: Ragnarok-->Ant-Man and the Wasp-->INFINITY WAR-->Captain Marvel-->ENDGAME
NO END-CREDITS for "Ant-Man and the Wasp" until AFTER "INFNITY WAR".
NO END-CREDITS for "Black Widow" until AFTER "ENDGAME" ideally after "Falcon and the Winter Soldier".
This is a RECOMMENDED ROAD MAP to efficiently guide you through Marvel content through the next interlude. The last OPTIONAL interlude were the SIX SPIDER-MAN films. This OPTIONAL interlude covers the THIRTEEN X-MEN films. OPTIONAL MCU-ADJACENT content is in parentheses. Feel free to explore and enjoy!
2014
1. I Am Groot: Groot's First Steps, The Little Guy, Groot Takes a Bath, Are You My Groot?, Groot's Snow Day [after GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY]
2. GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY VOL. 2 + Guardians' Inferno Music Video
3. I Am Groot: Groot's Pursuit, Groot Noses Around, Groot's Sweet Treat, Magnum Opus, Groot and the Great Prophecy [before the Groot end-credit scene]
2016
4. BLACK WIDOW [minus end-credit scene best left until after "Falcon and Winter Soldier"]
5. BLACK PANTHER
6. SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING
7. (VENOM) [MCU-adjacent]
2017
8. DOCTOR STRANGE
9. THOR: RAGNAROK
2018
10. ANT-MAN AND THE WASP [minus end-credit scenes best left until after INFINITY WAR]
11. AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR
12. CAPTAIN MARVEL [only an end-credit scene is set in 2018]
13. AVENGERS: ENDGAME [begins in 2018]
(X-MEN INTERPHASE INTERLUDE)
14. (X-Men)
15. (X2: X-Men United)
16. (X3: The Last Stand)
17. (X-Men Origins: Wolverine)
18. (X-Men: First Class)
19. (The Wolverine: Extended Edition)
20. (X-Men: Days of Future Past: Rogue Cut)
21. (X-Men: Apocalypse)
22. (X-Men: Dark Phoenix)
23. (Deadpool)
24. (New Mutants)
25. (Logan)
26. (Deadpool 2)
The thing a out the accords was tony believed he was staving off something qorse
The debut of Tom's Spider-Man
Oh lord. Finally
lets go!! 🔥🔥🔥
You know why I'd always side with captain america in this debate? Being in check, literally means giving full control of the avengers, to the dude who decided to launch a nuke on new york. Does anyone really believe, that ROSS, is more qualified on saving human lives, after that? How does TONY think that's a good idea? If they were already "in check", Ross would've said, get out of there, there's a nuke, and instead of killing the entire alien armada, they'd be forced to abandon new york, see it get nuked, and the portal would still be there, the aliens would still be pouring through, so many more would die. And people like that mother, guilt tripping Tony by telling him her son is dead. I HATE people who blame others, like it's their fault, when they are doing the best they can.
Yes. Ross is the longest-running villain in the MCU. Everything he does is wrong, evil, and stupid. The fact that he's put in the position of Secretary of State instead of prison strongly suggests to me that Hydra still has a lot of people in the US government.
"With great power comes great responsibility." - Uncle Ben Parker
"Avengers: Civil War" addresses the fundamental question of power: If you have great power, should you do whatever you want with it, or should you submit to a higher authority? Who are you to play god?
Steve Rogers wanted total freedom to go anywhere and do whatever he wanted with no accountability.
Tony Stark/Secretary Ross wanted to control everyone and decide (perhaps unethically) where the Avengers should go and fight.
Rogers and Stark were both prideful and self-righteous. Neither could admit to being wrong.
Don’t put cap down to iron man level cap was 100% right.
@@joeclark2590 ….I will give any opinion I want. We’re all here just giving our opinions, and you are entitled to yours.
"With great power comes someone else's responsibility." - The Sokovia Accords
@@Stogie2112 Do you expect Cap is gonna go around robbing banks or something? Collateral damage is invetable, the last thing they wanted is some government controlling their actions, remember Hydra?
first time watching one of your reactions, and its enjoyable to see a genuine first time experience for people watching great movies. you have a vibe and a killer smile. keep up the good work darling, ill be watching more.
Thank you!!
21:20 Come on, even I had a vaginal discharge during that shot, and I'm a heterosexual man!