I love these little short bites of knowledge. I just wish RUclips would have notified me as I have your channels set on notify for all and I'm not getting notified of your shorts (not sure if that's how it's meant to be but it's annoying as heck if that's what they've chosen to do)
When building picture of thworld or mental model people tend act like lawyers rather then scientists. They look4 evidence bolsters their case. Rather then evidence might disconfirm it. Even with new evidence they neglect take step back re evaluate their initial hypothesis. Under stress &high workload this phenomena especially powerful. When i got in airplanes I was 29, ZERO experience& 1st plane I design was last airplane (configuration) ever had 2see a drawingboard every kid wrldwide was flying these RC sailplanes on thslopes. (Designing airfoil took me 7,000 hours flight time engineeeimg, flying 140 dffrnt wings.) When I engineered Dual Control 4Shimano bicycles it OBLITERATED any other parameter down 2this day no engineer can surpass it &when I taught olympians HOW 2sit on a bike world hour record was suddenly demolished by 30 guys beginning with Graehm Obree who built bike using my configuration. 2me, these people are lunatic idiots. Smthing about me fails 2hump lawyer syndrome my reality is reality yours is a download u 5star review. I explain. All aircraft engineered by Satan Reptilian angels bcuz they CONTROL ALL MANUFACTURING. All Reptilian &humans who belong 2Satan are cntrolled by BEAST CMPUTER THAT DOWNLOADS OUR entire MATRIX. Yahweh xplained 75% people NOT HUMANS but TARES. Satans cmputer animations. (All demons aere digital) Passenger jets: ThWORST plane try fly nex2 fighter jets& a nightmare 2handle bcuz of gargantuan MASS fuselage AND wings coupled with excessive sweep (wings) causimg fishtail resonance inclination 2constantly spiral. Alsi, is ALL TOO EASY suddenly have TOO MUCH WEIGHT TAIL &airplanes must have PRECISE CG. (They must balance at about 26% aft of leading edge (of thwing, u see) A tail heavy plane IMPOSSIBLE. TO FLY. Why satans boys make tail heavy "super" cars. Ferrari, Porche, lol they tail heavy &spin out. Airplanes can land 50-60 mph on2 a canopy of trees preserving people alive. But Reptilian engineer them2land 3 times faster. They make them fly super high bcuz altitude becomes a dffrnt DIMENSION (cmputer program) where Reptilian angels can soul scalp u. (Space is EVI it is thbiblical abyss). No human can go there. Or Reptilian will take your body. (Space used 2b heaven. Angels inhabited our planets till Satan opened evil portal with Hadron Collider) Imagine me trying 2explain all this 2a bunch of lawyers who wr taught in Satans elementary schools &Reptilian universities.
Former loadmaster here. Can confirm! Haha. Theoretically at least. Thankfully I never miscalculated the weight & balance but it IS absolutely critical to get that right and is one of the most common reasons for private plane crashes. Cessna owners be like "Don't worry! We got plenty of room for everyone!" [loads everything to the gills with max fuel load] 😅
> The *Concord* had a 18" dia. ½ recessed wheel in its tail because of the high angle of attack at take off & landing due to poor lift from its stubby delta wings that required vector thrusting by engine blast for necessary lift.
Does this damage the aircraft? Can a plane continue to fly with a pressurised cabin? How many tail strikes could a plane withstand before it’s grounded? It must cost a lot to repair the damage?
This begs the question...why isn't the take-off routine automated? From an outsiders prospective, it's seems like it could be the easiest part of the flight that can be done by a computer. You could use a system similar to what's used for landing.
@@se-kmg355 It is mostly automated. Autopilot and auto landing. It seems like auto-takeoff would probably completely remove pilot error of tail strikes. There has to be a reason why it isn't automated by now, but I just don't know why.
@@RK-kn1ud It would not necessarily eliminate it since it can be caused by several factors, that are mentioned in the video. If you have incorrect take-off speeds due to calculation errors or weight errors. You could receive a gust of wind that would effect the pitch. I know Airbus has a system like this for the A350 due to low visibility. But it needs to be tested and certified. It is lots of work and money for a system like this to be incorporated.
@@RK-kn1udThe autopilot is to a pilot what a dishwasher is to a cook. It relieves you of the most basic tasks. To fly an airplane at altitude is the easy part and not relevant to the outcome of a flight, yet it can become boring and uses mental capacity and attention that can be spend elsewhere much better. In the early days there were two pilots, a flight engineer, a navigator and even a radio operator in the cockpit. Although technological advancements reduce the workload, in a cockpit of two the autopilot is desperately needed. What happens if one pilot passes out? Happens every couple of weeks somewhere. Autoland is used mostly for actual CAT III conditions and with Low Visibility Procedures (LVP) in place. If not, an Autoland is extremely risky, but LVP extremely reduces the capacity of an airport. An Autoland in CAT III conditions is rare and the most stressful thing for a pilot, except emergencies maybe.
And tail strikes can be serious over time: China Airlines Flight 611. What a quandary whether to put a bumper on the plane and suffer inefficiencies of drag, or having the potential for catastrophic failure in the long run!
Funny you put yourself in the picture when talking about a pilots mistake causing a tailstrike. But the heavy yoke-use, is that regular for takeoffs? I have seen this kind of movement only on landings sofar.
Don’t forget that’s part of pilot and technician walk around to check tail skid placard for tail strike and shoe on bottom of cartridge if they did a light skid on takeoff 😅
Who else was thinking in sound effects when Petter was moving the yoke around? I dunno about you but all I heard in my mind was *pew, pew PEW! RRRRRRRRRRRRRR* 😆😆😆
OK, so the new format of YT - in which it now has *separate* categories for long form videos & Shorts - sucks! The main reasons are as follows: 1) It is impossible to see at one glance what's new & what's not. One has to toggle between these two 'categories' to see that. A user (both casual or subscribed to a channel) will/can not see at a glance what's new, and has to manually click on these 'categories' to try & find out what's new. This is irritating both for the casual user, and esp. so for the subscribed user, as this wastes time -- I'm not sure this will help with visibility as people will likely not want to do that... 2) The Shorts category does not show when the short was released. This 'time of release' function is there for the long form videos, but somehow, irritatingly, missing for the Shorts. One could argue that most people release shorts more often than long form videos, hence, this function/info is more important for Shorts, otherwise people would get confused about what they have seen & what they haven't; what's new & what's old (esp. as people change their titles all the time!). I don't think this confusion & sorting through a 'catalogue' (or trying to remember what they have & haven't seen) is going to positively affect users. I understand why this feature may have been added by YT (& even content creators might think that this is a good idea) -- i.e. in order to effect more clicks on more number of videos (esp. shorts) -- but, IMO, this is very likely to backfire for the reasons mentioned above. All in all, these changes are a pain in the butt for most users -- both casual & those who are subscribed to a channel -- esp. more so for the latter -- and I think people who create *both* long form videos *and* Shorts will lose out the most in this 'click-the-right-category-and-then-try-and-sort-things-out game'...! People who create only/mostly Shorts are next to lose out. If a content creator only/mainly creates long form videos, they're least likely to be adversely affected by this 'upgrade'. I think content creators should take cognizance of these facts, and realise that these changes are not really in their favour (even though it may seem so peripherally/initially). They should petition YT to revert back to the old format -- both for the users' viewing ease (which is the whole point., I'd imagine!), and for their own channel visibility. Cheers!
That would create drag and it adds weight to the aircraft. A light tailstrike normally isn't dangerous although it will need to be inspected and repaired. A hard tailstrike would need a complex and heavy gear to absorb the impact, so it's just better to properly train the pilots not to have tailstrikes
Some aircraft had it, like the Concorde. But it adds to the complexity since it need to be serviced and maintained, also a mechanism to extend and retract would add weight, so it is just easier to rather have a plate and sensor in the back.
@@Titovic79 I see. However, I do not see the drag as a problem, as wheels are retracted once airborne. Also I am not sure the amount of force the wheel need to carry, but intuitively, it does not need to be as strong as the main landing gear. The gear does not need to touch the ground, it just allow the plane tail to roll on the ground once certain amount of maximum rotation is reached. But as @SE-KMG and you mentioned, it would probably add weight, price, maintenance work. It still could be worth it, if the average cost and frequency of tail strikes exceeds the cost of having such wheel or there is no other reason for avoiding that. But it seems planes had this before, so it might have not been viable?
Most aircraft have a tail skid with a replaceable crush section or at least some reinforced skin in the area where a tail strike would occur. In most cases that seems to be the happy medium of weight and complexity while still protecting the air frame somewhat.
Why isn't there a proximity indicator taking into account rate of rotation and proximity to the ground of the tail? Even my lousy minivan warns me when I'm getting too close to the curb! And put on some kind of skid plate. But there's only one or two feet of ventral posterior fuselage at risk. Even my dual sport motorcycle has a skid plate.
Some of them do. Concorde had a little wheel on the tail for this . 737 has a tail skid which is a sort of slightly raised rectangle of compressible fibre glass type material with a little gauge window which if the tail strikes the ground, it will crush down a bit and the gauge shows that the tail has been hit and shows how bad it was hit. Then the engineers can know whether it needs fixed or not. It’s a green line which turns red as the tail is hit off the runway . And if it’s all red then it means it’s more severe etc, mentour has a video on this I believe. It’s quite a cool device
It would be interesting to see what a normal full flight looks like in the cockpit. Because all simulator videos are about things that normally don't happen. As a Passenger, you don't see what the Pilots are doing. Do you sometimes fly without ever touchhing the Joke? ONly programming the autopilot and the autopilot flies from take off to landing? How much can the Autopilot do?
Most have a collapsing piece that will show the mechanic or next pilot that there was a tail strike hard enough to require internal frame inspection.The problem is not scraping the skin, the problem is impact and frame bending.
I always thought tail-strikes happen when tails aren't getting paid enough.
😂😂😂Nice 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Wow
..and go bowling 🎳
Wdym?
😂😂😂
That's the sound of the pilots' hearts hitting the floor
I love these little short bites of knowledge. I just wish RUclips would have notified me as I have your channels set on notify for all and I'm not getting notified of your shorts (not sure if that's how it's meant to be but it's annoying as heck if that's what they've chosen to do)
When building picture of thworld or mental model people tend act like lawyers rather then scientists.
They look4 evidence bolsters their case. Rather then evidence might disconfirm it.
Even with new evidence they neglect take step back re evaluate their initial hypothesis.
Under stress &high workload this phenomena especially powerful.
When i got in airplanes I was 29, ZERO experience& 1st plane I design was last airplane (configuration) ever had 2see a drawingboard every kid wrldwide was flying these RC sailplanes on thslopes.
(Designing airfoil took me 7,000 hours flight time engineeeimg, flying 140 dffrnt wings.)
When I engineered Dual Control 4Shimano bicycles it OBLITERATED any other parameter down 2this day no engineer can surpass it &when I taught olympians HOW 2sit on a bike world hour record was suddenly demolished by 30 guys beginning with Graehm Obree who built bike using my configuration.
2me, these people are lunatic idiots.
Smthing about me fails 2hump lawyer syndrome my reality is reality yours is a download u 5star review.
I explain.
All aircraft engineered by Satan Reptilian angels bcuz they CONTROL ALL MANUFACTURING.
All Reptilian &humans who belong 2Satan are cntrolled by BEAST CMPUTER THAT DOWNLOADS OUR entire MATRIX.
Yahweh xplained 75% people NOT HUMANS but TARES. Satans cmputer animations. (All demons aere digital)
Passenger jets:
ThWORST plane try fly nex2 fighter jets& a nightmare 2handle bcuz of gargantuan MASS fuselage AND wings coupled with excessive sweep (wings) causimg fishtail resonance inclination 2constantly spiral.
Alsi, is ALL TOO EASY suddenly have TOO MUCH WEIGHT TAIL &airplanes must have PRECISE CG. (They must balance at about 26% aft of leading edge (of thwing, u see)
A tail heavy plane IMPOSSIBLE.
TO FLY.
Why satans boys make tail heavy "super" cars. Ferrari, Porche, lol they tail heavy &spin out.
Airplanes can land 50-60 mph on2 a canopy of trees preserving people alive. But Reptilian engineer them2land 3 times faster. They make them fly super high bcuz altitude becomes a dffrnt DIMENSION (cmputer program) where Reptilian angels can soul scalp u. (Space is EVI it is thbiblical abyss). No human can go there. Or Reptilian will take your body. (Space used 2b heaven. Angels inhabited our planets till Satan opened evil portal with Hadron Collider)
Imagine me trying 2explain all this 2a bunch of lawyers who wr taught in Satans elementary schools &Reptilian universities.
@@TOPMOSTPOP what the actual fuck are you on about?
@@TOPMOSTPOP you need to take your medicine
Most tail strikes I saw was on certification tests! It`s a great show to watch! (as long as you not really be a part of it)
and they can suffer a tailstrike before pushback if the cargomaster makes a critical mistake.
Former loadmaster here. Can confirm! Haha. Theoretically at least. Thankfully I never miscalculated the weight & balance but it IS absolutely critical to get that right and is one of the most common reasons for private plane crashes. Cessna owners be like "Don't worry! We got plenty of room for everyone!" [loads everything to the gills with max fuel load] 😅
Love the shorts! Really helpful for people new to the aviation world :)
Fun fact: The Concorde had a rear-landing gear to prevent tail strikes as it is the fastest commercial airliner
The reason you gave is... bullshit
Concorde had a rear landing gear because it had a very high angle of attack; also why it had a droop snoot
and we all know how concorde ended, so...
@@Kayaya it had nothing to do with anything discussed in here lol..wdym?
GREAT series on RUclips.
“Why airplane tailstrike?”
-Because the pilot don’t know how to take off 😃👌🏽
If you think their take offs are bad you don't want to be on board for the landings!
Those planes were really draggin ass 😂
Tailstrikes happen for me when I swap my skirt for jeans. Curse you, gravity...🤭
@@sirensynapse5603 It was a joke. 😄
@@sirensynapse5603 don't feel bad. It is a serious /whoosh to me as well
@@sirensynapse5603 I think the increased loading in the...rear can cause her to be bottom heavy on take-off.
Have you done this?
Nop. Not so far
@@MentourNow Is it on the pilot's bucket list? 😄
...or if there is a stone stuck in the gap between the elevator tab and the horizontal stabilizer
september the 8th, 1970
Tail strikes are actually more common on landings than takeoffs.
Japan airline 123:they didint fix my tail then you should know what happen while flying
> The *Concord* had a 18" dia. ½ recessed wheel in its tail because of the high angle of attack at take off & landing due to poor lift from its stubby delta wings that required vector thrusting by engine blast for necessary lift.
Does this damage the aircraft? Can a plane continue to fly with a pressurised cabin? How many tail strikes could a plane withstand before it’s grounded? It must cost a lot to repair the damage?
This happened to me and my dad on our was back from Indianapolis, and we were in a smaller place so it was really scary
Also they happen on carrier landings for TailHook™️ equipped A380s when landing on the USS Nimitz.
Yeah yeah tailstrike is not that frequent but it can get a dramatic impact on your flight💀
Love your Shorts and Videos, would Like to See more of this 👌
More coming
@@MentourNow alright, take your time you need
Incorrect repair procedures on tailstrike damage will result in a accident.
What are the repercussions for the pilot?
I experience two tail strikes on the same flight. It was my first and second tail strike in 40+ years of flying with modern human airlines.
"Modern human airlines," as opposed to...?
Queue X-Files intro!
Loving the new short videos. Very helpful info in a very quick bite.
I always tail strike when I butter too smooth in msfs
This is why butter landing is hard💀💀💀
A wheel there would solve a lot of problems there ... wouldn't it ??
I was in a small aircraft when that happened. Now I know why the rear tie down is so beefy. 🇺🇸
I have never seen one when plane spotting.
Pov- you play warthunder and have no sled control and both take off at 230kmh and try to go vertical instantly
Airbus : YOLK?
JAL 123, CAL 611, KLM 4805
This begs the question...why isn't the take-off routine automated? From an outsiders prospective, it's seems like it could be the easiest part of the flight that can be done by a computer.
You could use a system similar to what's used for landing.
You might as well automate the whole flight then?
@@se-kmg355 It is mostly automated. Autopilot and auto landing. It seems like auto-takeoff would probably completely remove pilot error of tail strikes.
There has to be a reason why it isn't automated by now, but I just don't know why.
@@RK-kn1ud It would not necessarily eliminate it since it can be caused by several factors, that are mentioned in the video. If you have incorrect take-off speeds due to calculation errors or weight errors. You could receive a gust of wind that would effect the pitch. I know Airbus has a system like this for the A350 due to low visibility. But it needs to be tested and certified. It is lots of work and money for a system like this to be incorporated.
@@RK-kn1udThe autopilot is to a pilot what a dishwasher is to a cook. It relieves you of the most basic tasks. To fly an airplane at altitude is the easy part and not relevant to the outcome of a flight, yet it can become boring and uses mental capacity and attention that can be spend elsewhere much better. In the early days there were two pilots, a flight engineer, a navigator and even a radio operator in the cockpit. Although technological advancements reduce the workload, in a cockpit of two the autopilot is desperately needed. What happens if one pilot passes out? Happens every couple of weeks somewhere.
Autoland is used mostly for actual CAT III conditions and with Low Visibility Procedures (LVP) in place. If not, an Autoland is extremely risky, but LVP extremely reduces the capacity of an airport. An Autoland in CAT III conditions is rare and the most stressful thing for a pilot, except emergencies maybe.
That’s called an Ollie.
And tail strikes can be serious over time: China Airlines Flight 611. What a quandary whether to put a bumper on the plane and suffer inefficiencies of drag, or having the potential for catastrophic failure in the long run!
Funny you put yourself in the picture when talking about a pilots mistake causing a tailstrike.
But the heavy yoke-use, is that regular for takeoffs? I have seen this kind of movement only on landings sofar.
Man I was on a plane last night and the landing was so hard I thought we were crashing
There's only ONE reason for a tail strike, and that is a loose nut in the cockpit.
wdym
@@quinnard9750 calling the pilot dumb
@@zacharyreynolds4303 oh ok
Ouch !! ,talk about pain in the Ass
Did it to a JP-5 in flying training. Caused a shit storm to fall on my head.
on the 747 they had an over rotation system that would shake the control column
Don’t forget that’s part of pilot and technician walk around to check tail skid placard for tail strike and shoe on bottom of cartridge if they did a light skid on takeoff 😅
Great instructor ...👍👍👍
Or maybe it's just Overloaded as usual; jam-packed with "Fattys & Freight".
Why did you show only Delta tailstrikes? 🤔
Random.
Why they don't fit small wheel there to avoid damaging tail..
It should retract with main landing gear
Asiana 214,JAL123,China 611 and KLM 4805:💀
happened at Teneriffe
Reminds me of japan airlines 123
Rest in peace
Or when the pilot thinks he's flying a fighter jet
Who else was thinking in sound effects when Petter was moving the yoke around? I dunno about you but all I heard in my mind was *pew, pew PEW! RRRRRRRRRRRRRR* 😆😆😆
If only I saw this 3 years ago during my aerospace degree 😭😭😭
OK, so the new format of YT - in which it now has *separate* categories for long form videos & Shorts - sucks!
The main reasons are as follows:
1) It is impossible to see at one glance what's new & what's not. One has to toggle between these two 'categories' to see that.
A user (both casual or subscribed to a channel) will/can not see at a glance what's new, and has to manually click on these 'categories' to try & find out what's new.
This is irritating both for the casual user, and esp. so for the subscribed user, as this wastes time -- I'm not sure this will help with visibility as people will likely not want to do that...
2) The Shorts category does not show when the short was released. This 'time of release' function is there for the long form videos, but somehow, irritatingly, missing for the Shorts.
One could argue that most people release shorts more often than long form videos, hence, this function/info is more important for Shorts, otherwise people would get confused about what they have seen & what they haven't; what's new & what's old (esp. as people change their titles all the time!). I don't think this confusion & sorting through a 'catalogue' (or trying to remember what they have & haven't seen) is going to positively affect users.
I understand why this feature may have been added by YT (& even content creators might think that this is a good idea) -- i.e. in order to effect more clicks on more number of videos (esp. shorts) -- but, IMO, this is very likely to backfire for the reasons mentioned above.
All in all, these changes are a pain in the butt for most users -- both casual & those who are subscribed to a channel -- esp. more so for the latter -- and I think people who create *both* long form videos *and* Shorts will lose out the most in this 'click-the-right-category-and-then-try-and-sort-things-out game'...!
People who create only/mostly Shorts are next to lose out.
If a content creator only/mainly creates long form videos, they're least likely to be adversely affected by this 'upgrade'.
I think content creators should take cognizance of these facts, and realise that these changes are not really in their favour (even though it may seem so peripherally/initially). They should petition YT to revert back to the old format -- both for the users' viewing ease (which is the whole point., I'd imagine!), and for their own channel visibility.
Cheers!
Delta says hello
What about wind shear? Isn't it another factor to cause an accidently tail strike as well? 😮
Interesting fact: 4 out of 5 Tailstrikes don’t occur during Take-off, but during landing…
I literally already knew this
How on earth would a tail strike occur during touch down? A very late go around?
I swear this guy has that swedish accent
Increase height of shaft of tires
do all to have a very expensive lightshow!
Can they suffer a tail strike when flaring too much on landing?
Me thinking jlm and pannam💀
Ya like the royal air Maroc 737 which rotated but didnt lift until the nose dropped then rotated a second time...
What is the thing hanging out the back in the first clip?
How this can damage the airplane ? do they have a tail wheel or some kind of slider to avoid damage to the airframe ..?
That’s at PDX aka Portland Oregon yes I’m here in Portland and I heard of that tail strike
Me in Microsoft hitting a 50 million dollar tail on the back of my 777-er 😂
Or when you input the wrong plane weight into the computer and get incorrect V speeds
7 years after the tailstrike
Japan air lines 123
Petter it is soon winter now, i use "shorts" in summer time... ;-)
youtube pants
@@kahulub You use them? look nice?
*Japan airlines flight 123 flashback*
how dangerous are tail strikes in the long term?
What about a change in wind velocity both up and down or even worse variable
When getting tail strike like china airline crash
Question: Could a tail wheel be viable option to prevent that?
That would create drag and it adds weight to the aircraft. A light tailstrike normally isn't dangerous although it will need to be inspected and repaired. A hard tailstrike would need a complex and heavy gear to absorb the impact, so it's just better to properly train the pilots not to have tailstrikes
Some aircraft had it, like the Concorde. But it adds to the complexity since it need to be serviced and maintained, also a mechanism to extend and retract would add weight, so it is just easier to rather have a plate and sensor in the back.
@@Titovic79 I see. However, I do not see the drag as a problem, as wheels are retracted once airborne. Also I am not sure the amount of force the wheel need to carry, but intuitively, it does not need to be as strong as the main landing gear. The gear does not need to touch the ground, it just allow the plane tail to roll on the ground once certain amount of maximum rotation is reached.
But as @SE-KMG and you mentioned, it would probably add weight, price, maintenance work. It still could be worth it, if the average cost and frequency of tail strikes exceeds the cost of having such wheel or there is no other reason for avoiding that. But it seems planes had this before, so it might have not been viable?
Most aircraft have a tail skid with a replaceable crush section or at least some reinforced skin in the area where a tail strike would occur. In most cases that seems to be the happy medium of weight and complexity while still protecting the air frame somewhat.
Has there ever been a pilot having his tie wrapped around those trim wheels spinning?
Oh well the Concorde can't have a tail strike cuz there's a gear on the back tail but Concorde isn't a aircraft now in 2022
No tailwheel? 😂
OMG MENTOUR DOES SHORTZZZZ
JAL 123.....
“An apple falling is when an apple falls”
Why isn't there a proximity indicator taking into account rate of rotation and proximity to the ground of the tail? Even my lousy minivan warns me when I'm getting too close to the curb!
And put on some kind of skid plate. But there's only one or two feet of ventral posterior fuselage at risk. Even my dual sport motorcycle has a skid plate.
Could it also be the size of the aircraft like a boeing 757-300?
Ok . Harde😂
Would this cause a pilot to get fired immediately? Do computers prevent this?
Tailstrike=death
What about bouncing while landing ?
I still can't believe they don't have a little wheel mounted in the tail at the point of contact
Some of them do. Concorde had a little wheel on the tail for this . 737 has a tail skid which is a sort of slightly raised rectangle of compressible fibre glass type material with a little gauge window which if the tail strikes the ground, it will crush down a bit and the gauge shows that the tail has been hit and shows how bad it was hit. Then the engineers can know whether it needs fixed or not. It’s a green line which turns red as the tail is hit off the runway . And if it’s all red then it means it’s more severe etc, mentour has a video on this I believe. It’s quite a cool device
@@christophermclaughlin5650 Awesome info.
Thank you!
@@vanpenguin22 no problem :) you have a good idea about the wheel also and I’m surprised it isn’t way more common as well
It would be interesting to see what a normal full flight looks like in the cockpit. Because all simulator videos are about things that normally don't happen. As a Passenger, you don't see what the Pilots are doing. Do you sometimes fly without ever touchhing the Joke? ONly programming the autopilot and the autopilot flies from take off to landing? How much can the Autopilot do?
Nop, we always take off manually and we almost always land manually.
@@MentourNow Thank you for the answer.
@@MentourNow Understand. So the Autopilot is mainly used during flight and landing with Autopilot on is just optional.
У пилота руки из заднего места.
Friend: a tail crash can never caus a crash
Me:
Tenerife airport Disaster
Jal 123
Asiana Airlines 💀
Or the Flaps is not extended
A320 not excuses. 737 it’s gunna happen
#Why Airlines Belly Strike! Up Next
Is there a little wheel on the tail or a piece of sacrificial material? Or just plain plane?
Most have a collapsing piece that will show the mechanic or next pilot that there was a tail strike hard enough to require internal frame inspection.The problem is not scraping the skin, the problem is impact and frame bending.
Concord had a tail wheel.
I proudly make claim to each incorrect maneuver.
Come Fly with Me.
So can you get fired for that?
tail strikes are a fire-able offense imo, but you know what they say about opinions hahaha