@@AlHakamOnline this is not history. History is where your ancestors lost the wars and becomes slaves in your own home. imagine bunch of outsiders beating the shit out of you in your own home
@@salahjanjuah2215 Just as I expected 🙄 you’re incapable of grasping the arguments presented and responding with facts. Everyone in the comments can see you making a fool of yourself
As a non ahmedi Muslim I wholeheartedly agree with you about the hypocrisy of many of our religious leaders But also let’s salute those who did stand upto justice Al alam Al shamikh Favorite pastime of nonwhites is to blame the white man for everything
Very astute observation. You seem like a educated man. May I suggest a book for you to read or lsiten to thr free audio version? It's called 'The philosophy of the teaching of Islam' by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad AS. Would love to hear your thoughts? You can stream it for free on your be or Spotify
This is an amazing program! especially for the new generation who are ever so misguided and fall trap to falsehood! Thank you for shining some much needed light on this! 👏👏👏
Very good information. As a non-Ahamedi, I appreciate the intellectual integrity of the scholar and the presenter. The British Empire saved Islam and Muslims.
HAhHHAhahahah saved Islam???? The British? You need serious help!!!! Go read history books so that you can see the truth. To even claim that, what a disgrace. Then you say you a non-ahmadi, what a filthy lie.
@@saliehassan5667 exactly, a miser Ahmedi, they and the rest of the Christian apologetics are very similar. All are a bunch of deceivers pretending to be Muslims whereas you will never see a Muslim pretending to be of a different faith.
@@roziurrahman1094 Whatever that means, I do know that Moses was preaching under the authroity of Pharaoh, Jesus under the Romans and so it's not unknown for prophets to work under non-believer's laws. Moses and Jesus left their homeland because their work became impossible but that was not the case in India. It is the case in Pakistan so the Khalifah has had to leave that country.
@@roziurrahman1094 Because they were both condemned by the authorities while Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was found innocent of all the charges brought against him under British law in India. It was his Islamic duty to express gratitude to those who created the system and environment where he could freely practice, preach and teach his understanding of Islam, unlike some so called Islamic states and communities now who teach hatred and conflict especially towards people of different views.
If most don’t know it how can you follow someone who you don’t know this about? How can most people not know about him? It’s been 120 years and there has been the advent of social media. Yet, most of humanity doesn’t even know who he is. Most Ahmadi don’t even know what Mirza wrote. I’ve read his writings. He was a blatant Kafir and liar. He claimed to be Isa Ibn Maryam. He also claimed to be the reincarnation of Muhammad SAW among other being in one body in the literal sense. Mahdi and Isa (AS) don’t come to preach a new religion with new articles of faith they were to adhere strictly to the Qur’an and Sunnah of Muhammad SAW. Yet Mirza was receiving revelation and writing books? He failed to marry Muhammadi Begam even though he “prophesied” that he would. He said even one failed prophecy is enough to call him a liar. So I am. Abandon this cult and accept Islam.
@roziurrahman1094 0 seconds ago I now understand history tells us Mirza was namak halal by his own admission of the British empire who carried out atrocities
Superb conversation. Very enlightening. It would be wonderful if you can leave a Google doc in the video description with sources and references from the video as an appendix of sorts. For a model of this, please see any video by Johnny Harris.
Moses and Jesus had no resason to praise the national leaders of their homelands. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as Imam Mahdi and Promised Messiah of the last lawbearing and most perfect prophet was free from any condemnation by authorities. He had reasons to praise the law of his time for it enabled him to defend Islam from the assaults of Christians and Hindus. For this work he was praised by all around him. He in turn praised the British who's law protected him so he could continue his work. As they do now in protecting his khalifahs, otherwise his work could not continue. All praise is due to Allah for defending His chosen servants and allowing the true message of Islam to be conveyed all around the world..
This is the most stupidest answer I've ever heard. If moses praised phoarah on lie for whatever reasons, later generations would be confused on the matter. Whereas prophets are there to bring clarity to the matter.
Please can we have the documents presented by Asif Sahib in a single file? They are indeed very useful. The back of the Anti Ahmadies is broken with these evidences.
This Basit kadyani host of MTA channel is afraid of Imtiyaz sahib and Adnan sahib, he can not answer their questions and dallying dilling in answers and try to play dajal and frabs in his reply.
Watch the podcast first before commenting. Rasoollah praised Negus who was the head of a colonial empire Axum and a Christian king. Rasoollah praised his freedom and justice. But an empire is an empire. Think logically before
you don’t understand. the british could not control the mass population if it tried to forcibly convert. still there were missionaries who managed to convert the banglaroians & small pockets here & there.
Mirza Attacks the Character of Jesus(pbuh) 😮😮😮😮 ---------1-------- Jesus(pbuh) called an Alcoholic: “What was the character of Messiah, according to you? An alcoholic and gluttonous person, neither abstinent nor a pious worshipper, nor an adorer of truth. He was an arrogant and self-conceited claimant of divinity.” Reference:(Noor-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 9, P. 387; Anjam-e-Atham, P. 5, appendix) ---------2-------- “Jesus could not portray himself as a pious man because everyone knew that he was a gluttonous alcoholic… His claim to Godliness was a result of his bad habit of drinking Wine.” Reference: (Satt Bachan, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 10, P. 296; Satt Bachan, P. 172, footnote) ---------3-------- “I do not think that Jesus observed any abstinence from wine.” Reference:(Review of Religions, Vol. 1, P. 124, 1902) ---------4-------- “The root cause of all the damage that alcohol consumption has had on the Europeans was that Jesus used to drink alcohol, perhaps because of some disease or an old habit.” Reference:(Kashti-i-Nuh, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 19, P. 71; Kashti-i-Nuh, P. 65, footnote) ---------5-------- “Once a friend advised me that opium is good for diabetes and, with that excuse, there is no harm in taking it. I replied ‘thank you very much for your kind advice. However, if I get into the habit of using opium, I am afraid that people will mock that the first Messiah (Jesus) was an alcoholic and the second (Mirza himself) was a drug addict.” Reference:(Nasim-i-Dawat, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 19, P. 434; Nasim-i-Dawat, P. 66-67) ---------6-------- Jesus(pbuh) called a Foul Mouth: “(Jesus) had the habit of uttering obscenities and frequently using foul language.” Reference:(Zamimah Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 289; Zamimah Anjam-i-Atham, P. 5) ---------7-------- Jesus(pbuh) called a Liar: “It should be remembered that he (Jesus) had also to some extent the habit of lying.” Reference:(Zamimah Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 289; Baraheen-e-Ahmadia, P. 369) ---------8-------- Jesus(pbuh) called Immoral: “Then surprisingly hazrat Eisa (Jesus), peace be upon him, did not practice the moral teachings himself.” Reference: (Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 20, P. 346) ---------9-------- “The teachings of Jesus ruined the whole of Europe since it permitted unrestrained and unconditional liberty. So much so that it resulted in all (practicing) adultery and fornication like pigs and dogs…” Reference:(Nur-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 9, P. 416) ---------10-------- Jesus(pbuh) accused of Promiscuity “Jesus had an inclination for prostitutes perhaps due to his ancestral relationship with them, otherwise no pious man could allow a young prostitute to touch his head with her filthy hands, and massage his head with the unclean perfume purchased with the earnings of adultery, and rub his feet with her hair. Let the intelligent judge what sort of character such a person must possess.” Reference:(Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 291, addenda; Anjam-i-Atham, P. 9, appendix) ---------11-------- “A beautiful prostitute is sitting so close to him, almost embracing him. Sometimes she massages his head with perfume or holds his feet, at other times she lays her beautiful black hair on his feet and plays in his lap. In that condition, Mr. Messiah is sitting in ecstasy. If someone rises to object, he is scolded. In addition to his youth, dependency on alcoholic beverages, and being a bachelor, a beautiful prostitute is lying in front of him touching her body against his. Is this the behavior of a virtuous person? And what evidence or proof is there that Jesus did not get sexually provoked by the prostitute? … The sexual excitement and arousal had done its work to the fullest. This is the reason why Jesus could not even open his mouth to say ‘Oh adulteress! Keep away from me’.” Reference:(Nur-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 9, P. 449; Nur-ul-Quran, Vol. 2, P. 9; Maktoobat-e-Ahmadia, Vol. 3, P. 23-24) ---------12-------- Jesus(pbuh) called an Impostor “A cunning and wicked (person) who had the soul of Messiah from head to toe.” Reference:(Zamimah Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 289) ---------13-------- He (Jesus) had nothing to his credit except cunning and deceit.” Reference:(Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 291, addenda) ---------14-------- “A most shameful thing is that the sermon on the mount, which is the essence of the Bible, Jesus plagiarized from Talmud.” Reference:(Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 290, footnote) ---------15-------- Jesus(pbuh) called Sinful “…. Now who is responsible for all these sins? The burden of these sins is undoubtedly on Jesus.” (Nur-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 9, P. 416) ---------7-------- “Jesus, peace be upon him, repented for his sins at the hands of John the Baptist and became one of his select disciples. This decides the superiority of John the Baptist over Jesus, since it is not proven that John the Baptist ever repented at the hands of anyone.” (Dafi-ul-Bala, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 18, P. 220) ---------7-------- “Jesus was not any more righteous than other righteous ones of his time. Indeed, the prophet John the Baptist was superior to him, because he did not consume alcohol, nor allowed any prostitute to massage his head with perfume purchased from her earnings or touch his body with her hands and hair, or that any unchaste woman should serve him. This is the very reason that God named John the Baptist as ‘Circumspect’ (Quran 3:39). But He did not give the Messiah such a title due to these kind of episodes.” (Dafi-ul-Bala, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 18, P. 220) ---------7-------- [Comment: And did Allah(SWT) give this title to any other Prophet? We wonder what their sin was?!!] Mirza Ghulam exceeded all boundaries of belief and decency when he uttered these words about one of the great Messengers of Allah(SWT). Anyone who has studied the writings of Mirza Ghulam and his supporters will readily realize that all the accusations Mirza levied against our beloved Jesus(pbuh) were among his own faults and shortcomings. By falsely accusing Jesus(pbuh) of these acts, he was hoping to be able to impress upon his naive followers that he was not any different than the first Messiah. Let’s examine a few verses of the Holy Quran which contradict what Mirza insinuated: -----1---------------- Behold! the angels said: “O Mary! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honor in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to Allah;” Reference (The Holy Quran, Aal-e-Imran, 3:45) -----2---------------- He shall speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. And he shall be (of the company) of the righteous. Reference:(The Holy Quran, Aal-e-Imran, 3:46) -----3---------------- While he was standing in prayer in the chamber, the angels called unto him: “Allah doth give thee glad tidings of Yahya, witnessing the truth of a Word from Allah, and (be besides) noble, chaste, and a prophet,- of the (goodly) company of the righteous.” Reference:(The Holy Quran, Aal-e-Imran, 3:39) Anyone who knowingly utters such blasphamy has given up faith in Islam. Mirza Belies the Teachings of Jesus(pbuh) “A most shameful thing is that the sermon on the mount, which is the essence of the Bible, Jesus plagiarized from Talmud and pretended it to be his own preaching. Since this fraud has been exposed, Christians are very embarrassed. Jesus did this to perhaps gain influence by presenting some good teachings… The unfortunate thing is that these teachings are an afford to the rules of Wisdom and upright conscience.” Reference: (Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 290, footnote) “The teachings of Jesus ruined the whole of Europe since it permitted unrestrained and unconditional liberty. So much so that it resulted in all (practicing) adultery and fornication like pigs and dogs. And immortality has spread to such an extent that they even write on wrappers of foreign candies: ‘Kiss me, O my sweetheart’. Now who is responsible for all these sins? The burden of these sins is undoubtedly on Jesus.” Reference: (Nur-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 9, P. 416) “… his (Jesus’s) achievements were so poor that he was almost a failure.” Reference: (Azalah-i-Auham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 3, P. 258) Mirza was not happy with having attacked the character of Jesus(pbuh), he needed to also reject his(pbuh) very prophethood. Naturally, he had to attack the teachings of this great Prophet, in his attempt at suggesting that his own failures were not any different than the ones he fabricated against the real Messiah! Unfortunately for him, Allah(SWT) rejects this false accusation, as well:
Then will Allah say: “O Jesus the son of Mary! Recount My favor to thee and to thy mother. Behold! I strengthened thee with the holy spirit, so that thou didst speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. Behold! I taught thee the Book and Wisdom, the Law and the Gospel and behold!…” Reference: (The Holy Quran, Al-Maeda, 5:110) Then, in their wake, We followed them up with (others of) Our messengers: We sent after them Jesus the son of Mary, and bestowed on him the Gospel; and We ordained in the hearts of those who followed him Compassion and Mercy… Reference: (The Holy Quran, Al-Hadid, 57:27) Only an unbeliever would utter false charges against Jesus(pbuh).
@@roziurrahman1094 He never even claimed to be those persons physically so reference to different mothers is not applicable. Also every prophet is also a Mahdi.
Question is in the process of protecting these shrines, how much of Islam was hijacked! Muslims did not start believe that Jesus was coming back out of nowhere! I understand our markaz is in UK, but call a spade a spade. Looking at what British did with indigenous communities in Canada, and left Palestine to fend for itself, British have not done anything out of goodness of its heart or for free! Also Basit sahib, can you sound less angry!
You say you provide evidence, you must provide evidence to your claim to weapons be that close, under the burial place of our Prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wa sallam or I will completely disregard you as credible. You have provided at lot of so called evidence and this claim that is impossible to believe needs evidence please.
Cheap shot mr khan, have you run out of real intellectual discussion points already? Since you have made the comment, I would request that you swear an oath to Allah that may he destroy you if you are lying about this accusation. Let’s test your mettle
The irony Mr Khan is that you as a man of medical science gave up on the Messiah of our times who proved from Quran categorically that Isa Ibn Maryam has indeed passed away, and instead jumped ship and embraced the absurd belief that Isa Ibn Maryam was physically raised into heavens and has been living wherever that heaven is for the past 2000 years in his earthly body. I wonder if the UK medical board are aware of your absurd quack beliefs, they should certainly revoke your license to practice and certify you as medically insane and incompetent.
The very fact this podcast had to be done, is enough for me to know I made the right decision leaving Jamaat e Ahmadiyya. I cannot believe my generation are still blinded by this.
You serious? Open your eyes, the propaganda that Ahmadis are British agents is so widespread amongst Muslims of course this is an important topic to cover. What are you talking about.
And what is your generation please do tell? And what Islam are you now inviting Ahmadis too? Brelvi, Shia, Deobundi, Sufi, ahle Hadith, Wahabi, Ismaili?
A Muslim is a Person who believes in the Final Message of Prophet Muhammed SAW of 1400 years ago. Mirza claimed to be a Mahdi and then he became Jesus in his 2nd Coming,..... This is what made Mirzayat or Ahmadi a NEW Religion, different from Islam of Prophet Muhammed of 1400 years ago.
My dear Izhar Khan, the great thing about history is that one can go back and review it for themselves. And I resent your accusation that Ahmadis are gullible and believe anything. Alhumdolillah we are god fearing and have intelligence to decipher truth from falsehood. It’s a shame your ego has put you on the path of utter humiliation and destruction. Humble yourself and perhaps Allah may have mercy on you again.
@@SwordOfAllah7860 as an example the Sherif McMahon correspondence proved to be a betrayal of the Arabs by the British who never wanted there to be a United Arab nation following the defeat of the Ottomans. Basit is very clever in concealing the real intentions of the British Empire. I suggest you read Line in the Sand, a book that describes the Sykes Picot pact and its consequences. Basit doesn’t even mention it. Once I have time I will respond point by point inshallah.
@@bhattibhatti9494 appreciated, it’s a modern world where you can seek the truth quite easily. Information is at your finger tips so I will not waste my time justifying to heretics. Allah has plenty of surprises in store for them in the here after.
@@MrFaizanhfunny you say that. Which books have you read of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad AS since they are readily available for you to seek the actual truth? Becusee the truth is available people don't necessarily make a conceded effort to get to the bottom of it. Case and point. Which books have you read of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad AS start to finish? Maybe here is a good start for you so you get to the bottom of of this. The name of the book is 'The philosophy of the teaching of Islam' maybe listen to the free audio but either way please share your insights into the scams shared in this book? Please help bring us to the right path.. Need your help.
@@bhattibhatti9494 I know you were. So was I. I’m pretty aware of you misers and I don’t even take your occult seriously. Neither do other true Muslims.
@@newsocial1658 I see. Very astute observation. Your right. Their entire conversation has nothing to do with knowledge of anything. Where do I sign up for your you tube Chanel to get your hot takes on non knowledgeable matters?
@@newsocial1658 @newsocial1658 Ah there it is again. Your 'knowledge' and educated responses. I'll pass for now. Thanks for proving the obvious. Maybe work on your videos. 219 plus views on your top video. Maybe share something that's means sowmthing to someone. Kind of the opposite of what your doing here. :)
Did you know this history? Tell us below 👇
I know this one 🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽
I now understand history tells us Mirza was namak halal by his own admission of the British empire who carried out atrocities
@@AlHakamOnline this is not history. History is where your ancestors lost the wars and becomes slaves in your own home. imagine bunch of outsiders beating the shit out of you in your own home
Masha Allah 🎉 Jazakallah 🎉
ruclips.net/video/kG6V2VapCQU/видео.html
This is so good! Didn't know so many of these things... a real eye opener. I hope those who disagree come with proper evidence instead of mockery
Agreed!
Here’s some evidence 🚽🚽🚽🚽🚽
@@salahjanjuah2215 Just as I expected 🙄 you’re incapable of grasping the arguments presented and responding with facts. Everyone in the comments can see you making a fool of yourself
@@rambo1991-s9j are you blind? I gave you two facts.
An eye opener that Mirza was namak halal of the British empire by his own admission
As a non ahmedi Muslim I wholeheartedly agree with you about the hypocrisy of many of our religious leaders
But also let’s salute those who did stand upto justice
Al alam Al shamikh
Favorite pastime of nonwhites is to blame the white man for everything
Very astute observation. You seem like a educated man. May I suggest a book for you to read or lsiten to thr free audio version? It's called 'The philosophy of the teaching of Islam' by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad AS. Would love to hear your thoughts? You can stream it for free on your be or Spotify
This is an amazing program! especially for the new generation who are ever so misguided and fall trap to falsehood!
Thank you for shining some much needed light on this!
👏👏👏
Very good information. As a non-Ahamedi, I appreciate the intellectual integrity of the scholar and the presenter. The British Empire saved Islam and Muslims.
And what about the massacre, genocide, remember divide and rule.
@@roziurrahman1094 no need to ask this scoundrel anything, he’s an Ahmedi pretending to be a neutral Muslim like the rest of these clowns.
HAhHHAhahahah saved Islam???? The British? You need serious help!!!! Go read history books so that you can see the truth. To even claim that, what a disgrace. Then you say you a non-ahmadi, what a filthy lie.
@@saliehassan5667 exactly, a miser Ahmedi, they and the rest of the Christian apologetics are very similar. All are a bunch of deceivers pretending to be Muslims whereas you will never see a Muslim pretending to be of a different faith.
very interesting and informative. Thank you very much. More like this please.
You got it!
@@qudsiaward interesting to know by mirza's own admission and words that he was a 'namak halal' of the British emipre
@@roziurrahman1094 Whatever that means, I do know that Moses was preaching under the authroity of Pharaoh, Jesus under the Romans and so it's not unknown for prophets to work under non-believer's laws. Moses and Jesus left their homeland because their work became impossible but that was not the case in India. It is the case in Pakistan so the Khalifah has had to leave that country.
@@qudsiaward but they didn't suck up to the barbaric British rule the way Mirza did and if so reference please.
@@roziurrahman1094 Because they were both condemned by the authorities while Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was found innocent of all the charges brought against him under British law in India. It was his Islamic duty to express gratitude to those who created the system and environment where he could freely practice, preach and teach his understanding of Islam, unlike some so called Islamic states and communities now who teach hatred and conflict especially towards people of different views.
Wow more need to know this history!
@@ABT-ns1w yeah we found out about Mirza's own admission and words that he was a 'namak halal' of the British empire
Very informative podcast. May Allah bless Islam Ahmadiyyat
Jazaka'Allah for the comment. More to come!
Al Hakam is doing a great job uncovering the true history 🫡 Lots of prayers for your success in this mission or truth ♥️
Here's the history most don't know!
If most don’t know it how can you follow someone who you don’t know this about?
How can most people not know about him? It’s been 120 years and there has been the advent of social media. Yet, most of humanity doesn’t even know who he is.
Most Ahmadi don’t even know what Mirza wrote. I’ve read his writings. He was a blatant Kafir and liar.
He claimed to be Isa Ibn Maryam. He also claimed to be the reincarnation of Muhammad SAW among other being in one body in the literal sense.
Mahdi and Isa (AS) don’t come to preach a new religion with new articles of faith they were to adhere strictly to the Qur’an and Sunnah of Muhammad SAW. Yet Mirza was receiving revelation and writing books?
He failed to marry Muhammadi Begam even though he “prophesied” that he would.
He said even one failed prophecy is enough to call him a liar. So I am.
Abandon this cult and accept Islam.
@roziurrahman1094
0 seconds ago
I now understand history tells us Mirza was namak halal by his own admission of the British empire who carried out atrocities
because it never existed.
As Salamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullah Blessed stream Aameen ❤️...
Very good information that a lot of people don’t know and should know
Superb conversation. Very enlightening. It would be wonderful if you can leave a Google doc in the video description with sources and references from the video as an appendix of sorts.
For a model of this, please see any video by Johnny Harris.
Moses and Jesus had no resason to praise the national leaders of their homelands. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as Imam Mahdi and Promised Messiah of the last lawbearing and most perfect prophet was free from any condemnation by authorities. He had reasons to praise the law of his time for it enabled him to defend Islam from the assaults of Christians and Hindus. For this work he was praised by all around him. He in turn praised the British who's law protected him so he could continue his work. As they do now in protecting his khalifahs, otherwise his work could not continue. All praise is due to Allah for defending His chosen servants and allowing the true message of Islam to be conveyed all around the world..
This is the most stupidest answer I've ever heard. If moses praised phoarah on lie for whatever reasons, later generations would be confused on the matter. Whereas prophets are there to bring clarity to the matter.
Amazing stuff 👍👍
Glad you liked it!
Amazing because Mirza was namak halal of British empire
Very intresting program۔
Thank you all
Could you include the links to the documents? I am writing a book and I need authentic citations.
Informative apreciating
JazakAllah! Don't forget to share and subscribe.
Nice show. The last chapter, ‘ Why did he not condemn British atrocities?’ was not adequate though. Need to expand
Did mirza say he is namak halal of british emire and also was he krishna?
Please answer
did you even watch the video ?
ofc the promised messiah as was not krishna
@@danstech2864 did he say he was namak halal of British empire?
Namak halal? I think you have watched one to many Amitabh movies
@@SwordOfAllah7860 yeah Mirza was a great convincing actor
Please can we have the documents presented by Asif Sahib in a single file?
They are indeed very useful. The back of the Anti Ahmadies is broken with these evidences.
Soon to be released as an article, insha'Allah.
This is what you call self hate. Selling your own people.
Please invite Adnan Rashid.
Why waste their time on such a dishonest and vile person? I think he's proven his "academic honesty" enough to be absolutely zero.
@@bhattibhatti9494he has literally destroyed your religion and that Kafir Mirza Ghulam, the biggest Dajjal known to man so far.
This Basit kadyani host of MTA channel is afraid of Imtiyaz sahib and Adnan sahib, he can not answer their questions and dallying dilling in answers and try to play dajal and frabs in his reply.
Adnan Rashid only talks loud and disruptive typical of India TV.
Scared
Your so called prophet praised his colonial masters. If he was a messenger of Allah he would have stood up against the British oppressors.
Watch the podcast first before commenting. Rasoollah praised Negus who was the head of a colonial empire Axum and a Christian king. Rasoollah praised his freedom and justice. But an empire is an empire. Think logically before
you don’t understand. the british could not control the mass population if it tried to forcibly convert. still there were missionaries who managed to convert the banglaroians & small pockets here & there.
Ofc be never came back, how despicable, to lie.
QUESTION.....QUESTION
DID Allama Iqbal praise British Rule..?
Answer Answer...did he claim to be appointed by God?....do you become children of the prostitutes by not believing and respecting what Iqbal wrote?
Mirza Attacks the Character of Jesus(pbuh) 😮😮😮😮
---------1--------
Jesus(pbuh) called an Alcoholic:
“What was the character of Messiah, according to you? An alcoholic and gluttonous person, neither abstinent nor a pious worshipper, nor an adorer of truth. He was an arrogant and self-conceited claimant of divinity.”
Reference:(Noor-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 9, P. 387; Anjam-e-Atham, P. 5, appendix)
---------2--------
“Jesus could not portray himself as a pious man because everyone knew that he was a gluttonous alcoholic… His claim to Godliness was a result of his bad habit of drinking Wine.”
Reference: (Satt Bachan, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 10, P. 296; Satt Bachan, P. 172, footnote)
---------3--------
“I do not think that Jesus observed any abstinence from wine.”
Reference:(Review of Religions, Vol. 1, P. 124, 1902)
---------4--------
“The root cause of all the damage that alcohol consumption has had on the Europeans was that Jesus used to drink alcohol, perhaps because of some disease or an old habit.”
Reference:(Kashti-i-Nuh, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 19, P. 71; Kashti-i-Nuh, P. 65, footnote)
---------5--------
“Once a friend advised me that opium is good for diabetes and, with that excuse, there is no harm in taking it. I replied ‘thank you very much for your kind advice. However, if I get into the habit of using opium, I am afraid that people will mock that the first Messiah (Jesus) was an alcoholic and the second (Mirza himself) was a drug addict.”
Reference:(Nasim-i-Dawat, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 19, P. 434; Nasim-i-Dawat, P. 66-67)
---------6--------
Jesus(pbuh) called a Foul Mouth:
“(Jesus) had the habit of uttering obscenities and frequently using foul language.”
Reference:(Zamimah Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 289; Zamimah Anjam-i-Atham, P. 5)
---------7--------
Jesus(pbuh) called a Liar:
“It should be remembered that he (Jesus) had also to some extent the habit of lying.”
Reference:(Zamimah Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 289; Baraheen-e-Ahmadia, P. 369)
---------8--------
Jesus(pbuh) called Immoral:
“Then surprisingly hazrat Eisa (Jesus), peace be upon him, did not practice the moral teachings himself.”
Reference: (Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 20, P. 346)
---------9--------
“The teachings of Jesus ruined the whole of Europe since it permitted unrestrained and unconditional liberty. So much so that it resulted in all (practicing) adultery and fornication like pigs and dogs…”
Reference:(Nur-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 9, P. 416)
---------10--------
Jesus(pbuh) accused of Promiscuity
“Jesus had an inclination for prostitutes perhaps due to his ancestral relationship with them, otherwise no pious man could allow a young prostitute to touch his head with her filthy hands, and massage his head with the unclean perfume purchased with the earnings of adultery, and rub his feet with her hair. Let the intelligent judge what sort of character such a person must possess.”
Reference:(Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 291, addenda; Anjam-i-Atham, P. 9, appendix)
---------11--------
“A beautiful prostitute is sitting so close to him, almost embracing him. Sometimes she massages his head with perfume or holds his feet, at other times she lays her beautiful black hair on his feet and plays in his lap. In that condition, Mr. Messiah is sitting in ecstasy. If someone rises to object, he is scolded. In addition to his youth, dependency on alcoholic beverages, and being a bachelor, a beautiful prostitute is lying in front of him touching her body against his. Is this the behavior of a virtuous person? And what evidence or proof is there that Jesus did not get sexually provoked by the prostitute? … The sexual excitement and arousal had done its work to the fullest. This is the reason why Jesus could not even open his mouth to say ‘Oh adulteress! Keep away from me’.”
Reference:(Nur-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 9, P. 449; Nur-ul-Quran, Vol. 2, P. 9; Maktoobat-e-Ahmadia, Vol. 3, P. 23-24)
---------12--------
Jesus(pbuh) called an Impostor
“A cunning and wicked (person) who had the soul of Messiah from head to toe.”
Reference:(Zamimah Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 289)
---------13--------
He (Jesus) had nothing to his credit except cunning and deceit.”
Reference:(Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 291, addenda)
---------14--------
“A most shameful thing is that the sermon on the mount, which is the essence of the Bible, Jesus plagiarized from Talmud.”
Reference:(Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 290, footnote)
---------15--------
Jesus(pbuh) called Sinful
“…. Now who is responsible for all these sins? The burden of these sins is undoubtedly on Jesus.”
(Nur-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 9, P. 416)
---------7--------
“Jesus, peace be upon him, repented for his sins at the hands of John the Baptist and became one of his select disciples. This decides the superiority of John the Baptist over Jesus, since it is not proven that John the Baptist ever repented at the hands of anyone.”
(Dafi-ul-Bala, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 18, P. 220)
---------7--------
“Jesus was not any more righteous than other righteous ones of his time. Indeed, the prophet John the Baptist was superior to him, because he did not consume alcohol, nor allowed any prostitute to massage his head with perfume purchased from her earnings or touch his body with her hands and hair, or that any unchaste woman should serve him. This is the very reason that God named John the Baptist as ‘Circumspect’ (Quran 3:39). But He did not give the Messiah such a title due to these kind of episodes.”
(Dafi-ul-Bala, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 18, P. 220)
---------7--------
[Comment: And did Allah(SWT) give this title to any other Prophet? We wonder what their sin was?!!]
Mirza Ghulam exceeded all boundaries of belief and decency when he uttered these words about one of the great Messengers of Allah(SWT).
Anyone who has studied the writings of Mirza Ghulam and his supporters will readily realize that all the accusations Mirza levied against our beloved Jesus(pbuh) were among his own faults and shortcomings.
By falsely accusing Jesus(pbuh) of these acts, he was hoping to be able to impress upon his naive followers that he was not any different than the first Messiah.
Let’s examine a few verses of the Holy Quran which contradict what Mirza insinuated:
-----1----------------
Behold! the angels said: “O Mary! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honor in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to Allah;”
Reference (The Holy Quran, Aal-e-Imran, 3:45)
-----2----------------
He shall speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. And he shall be (of the company) of the righteous.
Reference:(The Holy Quran, Aal-e-Imran, 3:46)
-----3----------------
While he was standing in prayer in the chamber, the angels called unto him: “Allah doth give thee glad tidings of Yahya, witnessing the truth of a Word from Allah, and (be besides) noble, chaste, and a prophet,- of the (goodly) company of the righteous.”
Reference:(The Holy Quran, Aal-e-Imran, 3:39)
Anyone who knowingly utters such blasphamy has given up faith in Islam.
Mirza Belies the Teachings of Jesus(pbuh)
“A most shameful thing is that the sermon on the mount, which is the essence of the Bible, Jesus plagiarized from Talmud and pretended it to be his own preaching. Since this fraud has been exposed, Christians are very embarrassed. Jesus did this to perhaps gain influence by presenting some good teachings… The unfortunate thing is that these teachings are an afford to the rules of Wisdom and upright conscience.”
Reference: (Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 290, footnote)
“The teachings of Jesus ruined the whole of Europe since it permitted unrestrained and unconditional liberty. So much so that it resulted in all (practicing) adultery and fornication like pigs and dogs. And immortality has spread to such an extent that they even write on wrappers of foreign candies: ‘Kiss me, O my sweetheart’. Now who is responsible for all these sins? The burden of these sins is undoubtedly on Jesus.”
Reference: (Nur-ul-Quran, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 9, P. 416)
“… his (Jesus’s) achievements were so poor that he was almost a failure.”
Reference: (Azalah-i-Auham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 3, P. 258)
Mirza was not happy with having attacked the character of Jesus(pbuh),
he needed to also reject his(pbuh) very prophethood. Naturally, he had to attack the teachings of this great Prophet, in his attempt at suggesting that his own failures were not any different than the ones he fabricated against the real Messiah! Unfortunately for him, Allah(SWT) rejects this false accusation, as well:
Then will Allah say: “O Jesus the son of Mary! Recount My favor to thee and to thy mother. Behold! I strengthened thee with the holy spirit, so that thou didst speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. Behold! I taught thee the Book and Wisdom, the Law and the Gospel and behold!…”
Reference: (The Holy Quran, Al-Maeda, 5:110)
Then, in their wake, We followed them up with (others of) Our messengers: We sent after them Jesus the son of Mary, and bestowed on him the Gospel; and We ordained in the hearts of those who followed him Compassion and Mercy…
Reference: (The Holy Quran, Al-Hadid, 57:27)
Only an unbeliever would utter false charges against Jesus(pbuh).
How can we understand Mirza as being jesus, Mahdi, Krishna. Is it like trinity like Christians trinity, or even trimurti, tridev
Why don’t you read his books?
Understand it just as you understand Isa (as) as being a Nabi, a Rasul, and a Masih all in one.
We're talking about three different person, not in terms of occupation. Mirza is different because he is from another mother to the other two.
@@roziurrahman1094 He never even claimed to be those persons physically so reference to different mothers is not applicable. Also every prophet is also a Mahdi.
@@Asterius86 so is the spirit of Isa AS in mirza
Question is in the process of protecting these shrines, how much of Islam was hijacked! Muslims did not start believe that Jesus was coming back out of nowhere! I understand our markaz is in UK, but call a spade a spade. Looking at what British did with indigenous communities in Canada, and left Palestine to fend for itself, British have not done anything out of goodness of its heart or for free! Also Basit sahib, can you sound less angry!
Why is the admin deleting my comments about the response to this video 🤣🤣🤣 too scared?
Baloch why do you delete my comments
@@SwordOfAllah7860 i did not bro
You say you provide evidence, you must provide evidence to your claim to weapons be that close, under the burial place of our Prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wa sallam or I will completely disregard you as credible. You have provided at lot of so called evidence and this claim that is impossible to believe needs evidence please.
Translate all his books into english
First you watch the whole podcast and tell us what you disagree with
Why not read the ones that have been translated? Which books have you read? Maybe start with the book 'The philosophy of the teaching of Islam'
Mr Cake efforts are being made to do this. But I assume by your comment you have read the ones already in English?
he sure seems a lot more confident in his echo chamber. he was visibly out of breath in front of Declan, Imtiaz and Adnan. 🤡
You’re definitely a fanboy of Adnan and Imtiaz. Ask them why they didn’t finish reacting to the whole video…
Mirza Sahib went beyond loyalty to the Raj. He even offered to spy for them.
proof ?
😮 no way, prove it!
Cheap shot mr khan, have you run out of real intellectual discussion points already? Since you have made the comment, I would request that you swear an oath to Allah that may he destroy you if you are lying about this accusation. Let’s test your mettle
The irony Mr Khan is that you as a man of medical science gave up on the Messiah of our times who proved from Quran categorically that Isa Ibn Maryam has indeed passed away, and instead jumped ship and embraced the absurd belief that Isa Ibn Maryam was physically raised into heavens and has been living wherever that heaven is for the past 2000 years in his earthly body. I wonder if the UK medical board are aware of your absurd quack beliefs, they should certainly revoke your license to practice and certify you as medically insane and incompetent.
The very fact this podcast had to be done, is enough for me to know I made the right decision leaving Jamaat e Ahmadiyya. I cannot believe my generation are still blinded by this.
You serious? Open your eyes, the propaganda that Ahmadis are British agents is so widespread amongst Muslims of course this is an important topic to cover. What are you talking about.
And what is your generation please do tell? And what Islam are you now inviting Ahmadis too? Brelvi, Shia, Deobundi, Sufi, ahle Hadith, Wahabi, Ismaili?
A Muslim is a Person who believes in the Final Message of Prophet Muhammed SAW of 1400 years ago.
Mirza claimed to be a Mahdi and then he became Jesus in his 2nd Coming,..... This is what made Mirzayat or Ahmadi a NEW Religion, different from Islam of Prophet Muhammed of 1400 years ago.
Difference is already here.. to many sects existed among ummah.😮 So think about it ..
Basit is deceiving poor Ahmadis. He is distorting history in the worst possible manner.
My dear Izhar Khan, the great thing about history is that one can go back and review it for themselves. And I resent your accusation that Ahmadis are gullible and believe anything. Alhumdolillah we are god fearing and have intelligence to decipher truth from falsehood. It’s a shame your ego has put you on the path of utter humiliation and destruction. Humble yourself and perhaps Allah may have mercy on you again.
Khan, it seems like you have an unhealthy obsession with this Basit gentleman
Izhar Khan maybe come with an actual answer & an academic response to his strong historical proofs rather than obsessing over him. Grow up.
@@SwordOfAllah7860 as an example the Sherif McMahon correspondence proved to be a betrayal of the Arabs by the British who never wanted there to be a United Arab nation following the defeat of the Ottomans. Basit is very clever in concealing the real intentions of the British Empire. I suggest you read Line in the Sand, a book that describes the Sykes Picot pact and its consequences. Basit doesn’t even mention it. Once I have time I will respond point by point inshallah.
@@rambo1991-s9j I cannot let him get away with his distortion of historical facts. He’s at best naive and at worst mendacious.
Joke
Sure I got one for you. What did Mirza Engineer say to Adnan and Imtiaz?
Praise the Lord god bless protect Israel 🇺🇸🇮🇱👌✡👃
zio bot
Also what is the nostril emoji doing there
Hell with Israel
Sod israel
What a load of bullshit by these bunch of scammers.
Great academic response 👏
@@bhattibhatti9494 appreciated, it’s a modern world where you can seek the truth quite easily. Information is at your finger tips so I will not waste my time justifying to heretics. Allah has plenty of surprises in store for them in the here after.
@@MrFaizanhfunny you say that. Which books have you read of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad AS since they are readily available for you to seek the actual truth? Becusee the truth is available people don't necessarily make a conceded effort to get to the bottom of it. Case and point. Which books have you read of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad AS start to finish? Maybe here is a good start for you so you get to the bottom of of this. The name of the book is 'The philosophy of the teaching of Islam' maybe listen to the free audio but either way please share your insights into the scams shared in this book? Please help bring us to the right path.. Need your help.
@@MrFaizanh I was being sarcastic 🤌 😂
@@bhattibhatti9494 I know you were. So was I. I’m pretty aware of you misers and I don’t even take your occult seriously. Neither do other true Muslims.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 nice comedy
Your lack of knowledge is absaloutly comedic.
@@ImranHabib knowledge got nothing to do with whatever conversation they’re having 🤣
@@newsocial1658 I see. Very astute observation. Your right. Their entire conversation has nothing to do with knowledge of anything. Where do I sign up for your you tube Chanel to get your hot takes on non knowledgeable matters?
@@ImranHabib you can sign up to your babe da kosa if you want to get knowledge Imran sahib 😂 yaadi da kosa
@@newsocial1658 @newsocial1658 Ah there it is again. Your 'knowledge' and educated responses. I'll pass for now. Thanks for proving the obvious. Maybe work on your videos. 219 plus views on your top video. Maybe share something that's means sowmthing to someone. Kind of the opposite of what your doing here. :)