@@giorgiomengoli I have uploaded videos taken with my Dobsonion scope to my you tube page. Although I get good results, it can't give the close up details that your scope does.
Why don't we have a live streaming video from an orbiting satellite on our Moon? Astronomers won't find interesting? Or perhaps they don't want us to see what's there up close?
@@bazpearce9993 I didn't want a Google answer. Obviously. That's why I asked. And you call me lazy. You could've told me by now. How about acting like a human being rather than an animal. Thanks
Top Aufnahmen ! Muss man schon sagen schön klar und nah. Wenn du es möchtest ! Weil du es kannst, denke ich ! dann nehme doch einmal die Stellen vom Mond in deiner Öffnung die ich in meinem Bildern vom Mond gemacht und dort eingezeichnet habe ! Were einmal interessant was du dort so mit deinem Equipment so siehst ! ruclips.net/video/WIyM9dlBpWE/видео.htmlsi=ptFBPIibSKZdM3UG
@@Jay-mb1ym The minimum sized object that a telescope can resolve, is limited by the diameter of the Objective Lens or of the Primary Mirror of that telescope… & is also affected by the distance of that object, from the telescope that is attempting to view it… Satellite borne cameras or telescopes that are used to view the Earth’s surface, are ORBITING THE EARTH… By making that comparison, you are expecting to see objects the size of a flag or one of the Apollo Lunar Landers, from the distance of the Earth to the Moon… which is approximately 240,000 Miles away… 🤔😳 Currently, even the largest Astronomical Telescopes on Earth, do not possess the resolution required to resolve objects of that size upon the surface of the Moon… However, it is claimed that the NEXT generation of Earth based Astronomical Telescopes, should be capable of resolving such objects… albeit another complication arises, whereby attempting to view such small objects on the Moon, at the higher magnifications required, results in serious optical aberrations resulting from the atmospheric disturbances within our own atmosphere… all of which are increased by the same magnification factor… Lastly… Even if successful images were obtained of the Lunar Landers on the Moon (which would only appear as very tiny & almost indistinct objects in any case…) the hardened skeptics who claim that the Moon landings were faked, simply wouldn’t believe the images were real either, & would claim that THEY were faked too…🤞🤥 just as “Flat Earthers” refuse to accept the authenticity of even Amateur Astronomers’ planetary images posted on the Internet, let alone any images taken by NASA. 😂 CONCLUSION: Nowadays, people tend to believe what they WANT to believe - IRRESPECTIVE of any compelling evidence to the contrary. While a certain amount of *discerning* skepticism & *diligent research* is a wise approach to take nowadays - since we live in times of MONSTROUS worldwide deceptions & the widespread endorsement of LUNATIC FRINGE ideologies, all of which have no basis in empirically established science or even Common Sense - nonetheless, there are matters that are sufficiently well documented, so compellingly rational & logical, that they should be taken at face value. HOWEVER: “You can lead a Horse to Water… But you can’t MAKE IT drink.” 🫲😊 🤷🏻♂️
Amazing
@@WonderfulViews839 Thank you!
Queste immagini sono uno spettacolo incredibile!
Complimenti!!!
Grande Giorgio!
😁👍🏻🔭
Grazie mille Valerio, troppo buono!☺
Excellent work. A very fine telescope here. Wish I could afford one. ( 10 inch Dobsonion user at the moment)
Thank you. A Dobson telescope can provide excellent lunar observations. 🙂
@@giorgiomengoli I have uploaded videos taken with my Dobsonion scope to my you tube page. Although I get good results, it can't give the close up details that your scope does.
@@screedy1050 Hi, The quality of your lunar images may be influenced by the aperture of your telescope or your image acquisition process.
What beautiful pictures and wonderful music. When I look at the pictures you took the first thing that came to my mind was time. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks!😊
Beautiful! I’ve subscribed from both of my channels.
Thank you so much!🙂
Beautiful images thank you for sharing. Lots of stuff to see going on up there!
@@jackiemcdonell1737 Thank you very much!
Very nice :)
@@artplus5757 Thanks!🙂
beautiful!
@@lotus30com Thank you!
Excellent hi res images.
Thank you su much!
Ottime immagini Complimenti🎉
@@Friggitoriamarina69 Grazie mille!
beautiful !! I have too CPC 1100.......when I look at the sky I do it with Vangelis (theme from "Cosmos")
@@liveandletlive8264 Thank you very much!
Pretty cool and clear video.
Thanks!😊
Why don't we have a live streaming video from an orbiting satellite on our Moon?
Astronomers won't find interesting?
Or perhaps they don't want us to see what's there up close?
Beautiful images with your C11. I just finished a Moon set with my 9.25 last week and posted on Astrobin. What mount are you using? I have the EQ6R.
Thank you very much, I also use an EQ6-R with my C11 🙂
Where are the alien buildings?
On the darkside of the moon
Can someone please tell me the estimated height of these mountains and crater ridges.
So lazy. Do your own research.
@@bazpearce9993 lol ok so you don't know, thanks
@@sourdoughbornsourdoughbred4712 I know how to find out. Takes less time than your reply.
@@bazpearce9993 I didn't want a Google answer. Obviously. That's why I asked. And you call me lazy. You could've told me by now. How about acting like a human being rather than an animal. Thanks
No aliens, sad.
Top Aufnahmen !
Muss man schon sagen schön klar und nah.
Wenn du es möchtest ! Weil du es kannst, denke ich ! dann nehme doch einmal die Stellen vom Mond in deiner Öffnung die ich in meinem Bildern vom Mond gemacht und dort eingezeichnet habe ! Were einmal interessant was du dort so mit deinem Equipment so siehst !
ruclips.net/video/WIyM9dlBpWE/видео.htmlsi=ptFBPIibSKZdM3UG
Thanks you very much!
Where's the flag?
Too small you can't see it !😀😀
Where is the lunar Rover or its tracks? If satellites can read a license plate, then why can’t we find some trace of any moon landings?
@@Jay-mb1ym The minimum sized object that a telescope can resolve, is limited by the diameter of the Objective Lens or of the Primary Mirror of that telescope… & is also affected by the distance of that object, from the telescope that is attempting to view it…
Satellite borne cameras or telescopes that are used to view the Earth’s surface, are ORBITING THE EARTH… By making that comparison, you are expecting to see objects the size of a flag or one of the Apollo Lunar Landers, from the distance of the Earth to the Moon… which is approximately 240,000 Miles away… 🤔😳 Currently, even the largest Astronomical Telescopes on Earth, do not possess the resolution required to resolve objects of that size upon the surface of the Moon… However, it is claimed that the NEXT generation of Earth based Astronomical Telescopes, should be capable of resolving such objects… albeit another complication arises, whereby attempting to view such small objects on the Moon, at the higher magnifications required, results in serious optical aberrations resulting from the atmospheric disturbances within our own atmosphere… all of which are increased by the same magnification factor…
Lastly… Even if successful images were obtained of the Lunar Landers on the Moon (which would only appear as very tiny & almost indistinct objects in any case…) the hardened skeptics who claim that the Moon landings were faked, simply wouldn’t believe the images were real either, & would claim that THEY were faked too…🤞🤥 just as “Flat Earthers” refuse to accept the authenticity of even Amateur Astronomers’ planetary images posted on the Internet, let alone any images taken by NASA. 😂
CONCLUSION: Nowadays, people tend to believe what they WANT to believe - IRRESPECTIVE of any compelling evidence to the contrary. While a certain amount of *discerning* skepticism & *diligent research* is a wise approach to take nowadays - since we live in times of MONSTROUS worldwide deceptions & the widespread endorsement of LUNATIC FRINGE ideologies, all of which have no basis in empirically established science or even Common Sense - nonetheless, there are matters that are sufficiently well documented, so compellingly rational & logical, that they should be taken at face value.
HOWEVER: “You can lead a Horse to Water… But you can’t MAKE IT drink.” 🫲😊 🤷🏻♂️