satisfying? why? cheater doesnt care. He made account same day and he can make another next day. It's annoying that they allow new accounts to play in tournaments. Eric is right
@@brunokocinas1635 Chess is about pattern recognition more than anything, and this epecially starts kicking in above 1000 elo. Get that intelligence bullshit outta here. The first time playing there is absolutely no way you wont blunder if you're playing an experienced 1200.
I think they should restrict by account age as well. Maybe have a 30 day account age minimum to deter most cheaters. Also, accounts rated over 2000, especially those in the titled rating range, should be highly scrutinized by anti cheating programs. I think often they go undetected because no one reports them.
@@dominusdone5023 . You won't be playing 96% accuracy against GMs, much less top rated GMs like Eric. I believe Eric is usually in the top 5 or top 10 of chesscom rankings. There are obviously only a handful of players in the world that can play that well against Eric. My point being that accuracy is largely dependent on your opponent's moves.
With the second one that's the nature of engines. At low depth even in winning positions it will recommend the same moves because it doesn't look for 3 fold.
@@DragonBank I don't think it is true. Chess engines are programmed to avoid draw in a winning position. This looks to me more like the user took over in those last moves ... but of course I lack the info ..
They ruined his tournament and tilted him. How is that a good job when he can't concentrate on his game because now he's worried about more cheaters making him second guess his moves??
@@pk-fi1ok Nah I've analysed my games before and the engine often says I made a mistake sacking a piece and playing for the win and instead recommends I repeat moves for a draw.
When somebody is winning by that much, you know they are cheating if they ask for a draw. They only ask for a draw against people as good as Eric because they know the game is going to come down to time and they won't be able to rely on their own skills to save them.
Maybe your cheater opponent had remors about you in the fact you are not a grand master, i think the cheaters chess players are jalous and vendictive persons towards the grand master
Some time ago I played a very obvious cheater who didn’t even take free pieces if not after 5 seconds time. I called him out and he pointed me as a sore loser. 3 days later that infant was banned, boy how was I glad
EH: Please take a seat. Cheater: Oh, hi, I didn't know you were here. EH: Were you expecting someone else? The one who you have been challenging for a chess game? They did tell you their ELO, right? Cheater: I can't... I can't remember. Yeah, I think they said their ELO was over 1800. EH: I have the transcript of your invitation right here. It clearly says that the ELO of your opponent was not even 1300, and that you were aware of this. Cheater: I don't remember that, maybe, I forgot. EH: Oh, and did you also forgot that you, and I quote, "want to backrank checkmate them with the white rook". And here you ask how if they have already played Arena Kings, and if they would be willing to play their first game with you. Your opponent asks if their low ELO is not a problem for you, and you said "I don't mind, lol". What's in the bag, so you actually brought the chess board with you? Cheater: I'm so sorry, what's going to happen to me? Am I under arrest? EH: That's not up to me. I'm GM Eric Hansen, and I am making a youtube video for chessbrah.
Chess.com has a serious problem with cheaters I reported two people in the last week and chess.com did nothing. These cheaters are ranging from 1000 rating to 1900 rating. The worst was the 1000 rated player who beat me when i was 1700 in a tournament and his moves were 98% accurate and chess.com did nothing. The cheater followed the computer line with 25 excellent moves to my measly 13 or 14. Although it was not a new account; there were definitely the 90%+ accuracy games against players 5 to 700 ELO points higher than him or her. Very obvious, this person is a cheater; but chess.com did nothing. Another was a 1800 rated player that went 99% and followed the computer line to the T in the mid to late game with a 99.7% accuracy. There was even the proverbial pause after the game started when a cheater turns on their engine. After that moves came so fast in a 3 min game. i reported this person and chess.com did nothing. I am so fed up of chess.com and their inaction that I cancelled my membership. Cant support a site that is built on ignorance
Hello! Are you the same Fritzi that plays on chesscom?? I think I played a couple games against you in bullet (I'm roughly 2000 on chesscom) and you demolished me like I just started playing the day before. You demolished everyone else too of course. The event was tournament for Tothkincso. Are you a GM by any chance?
To me it’s more than just shitty morals. What kind of sad sack, no life person goes and plays a chess tournament and uses an engine? What is the point? I don’t understand how that is even the slightest bit fun
2:40 "I should've played c3, I misplayed that." Literally every move I've ever made. I see why it was bad the second I make it, no matter how long I think about it. Lol.
7:20 i love when i see cheaters playing all by themselves because they are in time trouble and they can’t use no more engines, it really shows how trash and stupid they are! Kooo
The only thing i can think is they delude themselves into thinking they just have an engine on for analysis or learning purposes, when really theyre using it to confirm every move and avoid any blunders. Otherwise what is the point? it's a boardgame what possible reason could you have for playing at all if you are going to use an engine
Trolling essentially. And chess is quite unique with its ability for anyone to cheat against anyone with relative ease. It probably gives these people great satisfaction to beat these top level guys even if it isn’t legit.
@@XzVanQuisHzX But they didnt beat them, everyone knows engines beat humans, so what point are they proving? i just cant put myself into their heads, is it hoping the player just thinks theyre really strong? Is that useful somehow to you? When you know you aren't? They're always on anonymous accounts too for obvious reasons, so what glory is there in beating anyone?
@@jimmierustler5607 My friends a psychologist and he explained his view like this, he assumes that cheaters in chess are similar to cheaters in other avenues of sports etc. In that they believe personally they are contributing to getting victories over the other player, they disassociate with the fact that they are artificially gaining an advantage over their opponents because they arent even equating the means of getting an advantage, with beating their opponent. It's an elaborate variant of cognitive dissonance basically.
@@jimmierustler5607 I suppose even though they’re not beating them legit , it still gives them satisfaction to be on the winning side against these top GMs. All of these guys are probably bad players and frustrated with the game , having the temptation to throw an engine on and beat anybody in the world is too much to abstain from. Add in anonymity to that and it makes it completely risk free. There’s probably a deep level of psychology that explains all this in regards to trolling, cheating, etc.
Most cheaters get banned within a week. I agree with Eric, they shouldn't allow new accounts to join the tournament and ruin the experience. Imo they should add a rule where only accounts that are 1 week or older are allowed to participate. Anyone else think this would be a good idea?
*"there so many suspicious fuckers in this tournament"* yeah it sucks and there have been lots of abusers and new accounts which is stupid and should be stopped cause it just allows more of these people to pop up again and again which is annoying and i totally agree with you that its just idiotic on why they dont stop that
I think I have a fetish for cheater who run low on time and have to stop using their engine, and go from playing like a 3000 elo player to blundering 10 times in a row
On lichess you have to play X amount of rated games in each time control before you join its respective tournament, this is definitely needed on chess.com if you get that many cheaters lol
Smurfing is when a highly-skilled player creates a secondary account as a disguise to play against less proficient opponents. This almost always results in the Smurf steamrolling their lower-level adversaries, which might be hilarious for the better player but usually leaves their victims bitter.
There is no point of cheating, some people do it because they like to feel what playing like a GM is, i suppose, i mean that guy, even tho he was cheating he beat jobava, i bet he will feel so proud about that, every game that allow some sort of cheating it’s 100% sure someone will cheat, and im not talking only about chess, the other day i wanted to play again after several years an old Call of duty (2009 released) on my ps3 and i still met several players cheating, i mean, they were cheating on a 2009 multiplayer game on 2021... they are just piece of shit as the one we met in chess
@@Pauliex33 but they cheat on blitz too, a lot...lately it seems like i play a cheater in 1 every 5 matches. Always the best move, keeps disconnecting, gets flagged when has mate in 2 because doesnt know what to do, etc
Cheaters are simply flooding chess.com lately. Sometimes I play 800s who just seem to find EVERY best move. They seem to lose some matches on purpose to disguise 93%+ accuracy wins against much higher rated opponents.
Agreed. I normally play on lichess with a 2000-2100 rating on all time controls. About a month ago I decided to start a new account on chesscom and started at 800 (I think). I thought I was going to bulldoze my way through the ranks. I was very wrong. I would say 30-40% of sub 1400 players are playing far above their rating level with many of them being very very suspicious. Its one thing if I hang a piece but many of them were playing very deep positional quiet moves error free which is just not possible for anyone sub 1800 (maybe sub 2000). I got completely crushed by players rated as low as 900 and a few others in the 1100-1200 range. My rating eventually jumped to 2000 on chesscom as well to put things in perspective. Anyway, I reported them and I hope you do too. The more we report them the harder it is for them to keep cheating. But needless to say I went back to lichess as I'm not a big fan of chesscom even without the cheaters.
@@TheSadedz . I'm not sure if you directed part of your reply to me but according to chesscom my rating puts me in the 98% percentile so there are only 2% of players better than me. Logically, it should be a rarity for me to encounter a new account rated sub 1400 that can demolish me with a very high accuracy rate yet it happened far too often before my rating finally climbed.
Honestly if you're in the 800s range, it's very unlikely youre playing against cheaters. it's not impossible for your opponents to find good moves at that level, it's just that they make a ton of mistakes and you might not be able to detect or punish them. it's easy to say people are cheating to protect your own ego, but the more likely scenario is that you just need to get better at chess.
@@mineshaftrisotto . Without looking at each game individually its difficult to asses whether he played a cheater or not. We shouldn't assume that he hasn't played cheaters as there is no reason a cheater can't start a new account with an 800 rating. We all know online cheating is a constant problem as demonstrated time and again in our own games and streams by the likes of Eric (both Eric's actually).
2 seconds for Nd7 after e4-e5. Then he plays b6 and needs another to second to play Bb7 the next move. It's great that so many cheaters are really bad chess players, I'm afraid 2300+ players would be much more difficult to catch, if they did it well.
I just dont get why there's not a threshold like you have to have 100 games to play in a tournament. Just some number of games where you would be able to track cheating behavior and it couldnt be a brand new account
It is impossible to tell exactly, but if Stockfish 13 or even mediocre engine (mediocre in the comparison between the best engines) would play against Deep Blue, they would have an easy day. Era in 90s and 00s was peculiar in chess between man vs. computer, because on those times it was not evident, which one is stronger. In early 90s the best humans were better and in late 00s the engines had surpassed them. Deep Blue won Kasparov 1997, but engines usable in normal PC probably reached the same level in the next decade. In about 25 years human chess players have not developed nearly as much as engines (if they have developed at all, it is partly with the help of computers). Now there is no match, because it would be like man running against horse. For Deep Blue it would be the same treatment. Alpha Zero showed us few years ago new realms of chess, and now neural network is making the best engines even better. So, the difference to the times of Deep Blue is huge.
I found the exact same lichess cheater three times. Didn't even report it the third time just hit analysis on a few of his games. So always hit analysis after a game.
"draw? What do you think I am, a charity?"
3 seconds later
"Wait I missed your draw offer"
He literally doesn't care
Haha
pretty sure he was mocking his draw drama with hikario
The Hikaru sportsmanship award
@@user-zj7rw3rz8i his drawma you mean? Lol
I am waiting for Hansen to say to a cheater: "Why don't you have a seat, right over there."
What were you expecting to happen here?
I’m just here to make a move, I swear.
I swear, there wasn't going to be any mating going on
"You're free to close the browser"
It's pooja's alternative accounts 😂
He's been playing chess for his whole life but she won't stop taking all of his pieces :(
She’s back to step on his chest
@@hauntworld22 😂
@@hauntworld22 with those stilettos
LOLLLL
Dude these online cheater videos are my favorite. Watching eric stare at the screen and question how a 600 ELO guy knows theory will never get old
they cant catch my c++ bot
Seeing the account closed screen is always so frickin satisfying
satisfying? why? cheater doesnt care. He made account same day and he can make another next day. It's annoying that they allow new accounts to play in tournaments. Eric is right
@@NoskYTB I know but its not really a problem. There are many tricks
I don't know why, but i sometimes scroll my archieve games Just to spot some closed accounts. It happens. There's a lot of weasels out there.
@@andreitiberiovicgazdovici May I ask what rating and time control you're refering to?
@@Mukki.Berlin ?
"What are you? 440 pounds? 450?" :'D
That cracked me up
Into tears...
Ahahahahahaha
400 pounds* 8:01
can anyone explain what that means?
@@sanjeevkhurana6628 If you're not trolling, biggest in size. a 450 pound person would be quite large.
When you're a 3000 for the first 2 and a half minutes and an 800 in the last 30 seconds....
Lmao
well that averages out his rating to 2300, simple chessmath
Most of the cheaters wouldn't even get to an 800 rating lol.
@@PHeMoX nah depending on how smart you are you can get to 1200 the first time you play by just not blundering
@@brunokocinas1635 Chess is about pattern recognition more than anything, and this epecially starts kicking in above 1000 elo. Get that intelligence bullshit outta here. The first time playing there is absolutely no way you wont blunder if you're playing an experienced 1200.
Playing 2 cheaters.Still getting 1,5/2 points against them.Pure skill right there.
i wasn't cheating your boy just salty
@@ideservesomehappinessinmyl5500 nah it was definitely cheating tf you talking about
@UCSRwviUGaywdNAp44Cnnwfg huh? Buddy was playing top engine moves and got banned how is that not cheating
@@eliwilliams2825 first game those moves wasn't engine moves and your boy know that i was just defending great he was salty and get me banned its okay
@@ideservesomehappinessinmyl5500 ???
In the 2nd game, aligantorz had 95 accuracy while eric had 97.3 accuracy. It's crazy how eric is better than the weak engine
Hes not
The guy probably mixed in some of his own moves with the engine recommendations.
"Weak"
I swear Eric and Chris Hansen are related
Are you also related to them?
Same
I think you are their lost long brother.
@@Thelaretus its the chessbrah fans bro
Why don't they restrict arena kings and other arenas by account age? Or games played.
I think they should restrict by account age as well. Maybe have a 30 day account age minimum to deter most cheaters. Also, accounts rated over 2000, especially those in the titled rating range, should be highly scrutinized by anti cheating programs. I think often they go undetected because no one reports them.
@@dominusdone5023 well are you? 😂
@@samuelsteiner3854 no? You can easily get high accuracies if you punish your opponent for playing bad moves
@@dominusdone5023 . You won't be playing 96% accuracy against GMs, much less top rated GMs like Eric. I believe Eric is usually in the top 5 or top 10 of chesscom rankings. There are obviously only a handful of players in the world that can play that well against Eric. My point being that accuracy is largely dependent on your opponent's moves.
@@staypositive4358 you just agreed with him.
"...probably tilted him off the Earth." xd
Finally a GM confirms flat earth YEP
aCkShUaLlY tHe eArTh iS rOuNd
@@baxterbotox7661 nooo it's triangular
Eric: Takes on f7
Martin K4: Danger
4:01
Lmaoooo
Yeah I noticed it too, pretty good timing :D
Man, in every case, you flagged one and drew another one. I consider it as a good job. I mean f**ng good job!
With the second one that's the nature of engines. At low depth even in winning positions it will recommend the same moves because it doesn't look for 3 fold.
@@DragonBank I don't think it is true. Chess engines are programmed to avoid draw in a winning position. This looks to me more like the user took over in those last moves ... but of course I lack the info ..
They ruined his tournament and tilted him. How is that a good job when he can't concentrate on his game because now he's worried about more cheaters making him second guess his moves??
@@pk-fi1ok Nah I've analysed my games before and the engine often says I made a mistake sacking a piece and playing for the win and instead recommends I repeat moves for a draw.
@@jackholmes1035 i think that just means sacking the piece made you losing which an engine would never suggest
Chris Hansen, Eric Hansen. This is they way.
Just take a seat cheater, just take a seat right over there
They're allowing new accounts on purpose, so eric does the work for them :P
Eric is such a good guy he doesn’t deserve to be cheated this much
When somebody is winning by that much, you know they are cheating if they ask for a draw. They only ask for a draw against people as good as Eric because they know the game is going to come down to time and they won't be able to rely on their own skills to save them.
Already know from the intro it’s gonna be a banger. Keep up the good work Eric, you deserve the best.
Bro seeing Erick beat a cheater will always be damn impressive
it's actually incredibly impressive how well you hang in against stockfish.
3:27
"Ah s**t, here we go again."
the opponent prolly doesn't care
I've had cheaters offer me a draw when they were in a much better position, seems to be a common thing they do.
Some sort of brain disease of sorts.
Then you take the draw and run 🏃♂️
Maybe that's how they keep their rating low and their account off the radar. What's your rating?
Maybe your cheater opponent had remors about you in the fact you are not a grand master, i think the cheaters chess players are jalous and vendictive persons towards the grand master
They do that so they don't get the points so their rating stays relatively low to avoid getting caught
"To catch a cheater with Eric Hansen. " Brilliant.
So nice :D To catch a cheater! :D You guys are the best
It's probably indonesian.
Please be careful, Eric!
Don't expose a cheater if they are from Indonesia, or your life will be hell. apparently is a country full of Super GMs
What's your point
Dude you're late af
@@7cmhg840 this isn't a livestream
Why would life be hell to expose cheaters from Indonesia?
@@carpetclimber4027 levy "exposed" an Indonesian acc, turns out it was a real player and he was banned
its actually amazing his ability to know immediately and be correct.
Not really.
Eric: "Why don't you have a seat over there."
Cheater: sir pls
Eric: "What are you doing here tonight?"
first dude literally moved a piece every 3 seconds
Eric is freaking hilarious when he's mad 😄🤣
I got to go.. or something.. peepoLeave
8:25 "my eyes hurt, what are you doing?" I love you eric :)
Oh, I know who you are Eric Hansen, but see I calls you Eric Handsome
"You're my biggest fan?"
"What are you 400 pounds? 450?"
AYO WTF? No way he just did that?
13:26 When they came for Jobava, we came for their HEADS
No one messes with the exotic princess
I love how at 8:40 Eric sounded he was just pleading with this dude not to cheat
Should do a series like 24. Things like this don't get fixed overnight.
0:10 the bar only shifts that extremely if a blunder was played by the guy with an advantage. And there were a minimum of four blunders total there.
Lmaooo i like how it contrasts 'To catch a predator with Chris Hansen' lul
Some time ago I played a very obvious cheater who didn’t even take free pieces if not after 5 seconds time. I called him out and he pointed me as a sore loser. 3 days later that infant was banned, boy how was I glad
EH: Please take a seat.
Cheater: Oh, hi, I didn't know you were here.
EH: Were you expecting someone else? The one who you have been challenging for a chess game? They did tell you their ELO, right?
Cheater: I can't... I can't remember. Yeah, I think they said their ELO was over 1800.
EH: I have the transcript of your invitation right here. It clearly says that the ELO of your opponent was not even 1300, and that you were aware of this.
Cheater: I don't remember that, maybe, I forgot.
EH: Oh, and did you also forgot that you, and I quote, "want to backrank checkmate them with the white rook". And here you ask how if they have already played Arena Kings, and if they would be willing to play their first game with you. Your opponent asks if their low ELO is not a problem for you, and you said "I don't mind, lol". What's in the bag, so you actually brought the chess board with you?
Cheater: I'm so sorry, what's going to happen to me? Am I under arrest?
EH: That's not up to me. I'm GM Eric Hansen, and I am making a youtube video for chessbrah.
gold :)
Confusing episode but a great one
...A-are there going to be mods outside this door closing my account for violating the Fair Play Policy?
@@romanray3847 that’s not up to me
Eric won by timeout and got a Draw playing against machine's assistance. That's my friend is how strong Eric is playing clean on the board.
Chess.com has a serious problem with cheaters
I reported two people in the last week and chess.com did nothing.
These cheaters are ranging from 1000 rating to 1900 rating.
The worst was the 1000 rated player who beat me when i was 1700 in a tournament and his moves were 98% accurate and chess.com did nothing. The cheater followed the computer line with 25 excellent moves to my measly 13 or 14. Although it was not a new account; there were definitely the 90%+ accuracy games against players 5 to 700 ELO points higher than him or her. Very obvious, this person is a cheater; but chess.com did nothing.
Another was a 1800 rated player that went 99% and followed the computer line to the T in the mid to late game with a 99.7% accuracy. There was even the proverbial pause after the game started when a cheater turns on their engine. After that moves came so fast in a 3 min game. i reported this person and chess.com did nothing.
I am so fed up of chess.com and their inaction that I cancelled my membership. Cant support a site that is built on ignorance
Agree 100%!
I love how with this video the music in the background is saying “DANGER ... DANGER”
Do you know the name of the music track?
Eric complained about it our whole game. Unfortunately I wasn't able to use this as I complained about some other stuff during the game myself. :D
Arena kings causes lots of complaining for everyone involved 🤣
Hello! Are you the same Fritzi that plays on chesscom?? I think I played a couple games against you in bullet (I'm roughly 2000 on chesscom) and you demolished me like I just started playing the day before. You demolished everyone else too of course. The event was tournament for Tothkincso. Are you a GM by any chance?
@@staypositive4358 i like to play some kamikaze lines, which mostly work in blitz games, but not otb.
Complained about what if i may ask?
@@faznaz7455 lag problems
I suggest creating a title for those who get caught cheating: GW, grandwanker!
Every cheater's gangsta until Eric shows up
I wish i was good enough to keep a cheater from winning until there's mere seconds remaining on their clock. Very impressive win Eric !
Lmao you have the perfect name for this
Cheating is rampart on the net. It just shows us the moral level of today's society.
To me it’s more than just shitty morals. What kind of sad sack, no life person goes and plays a chess tournament and uses an engine? What is the point? I don’t understand how that is even the slightest bit fun
*rampant
So basically Levy's program but better and avoid any kind of confrontations that leads to drama? Sign me up
Except levy was just unlucky because he accused someone who happened to have a huge fanbase
@@giannisr.7733 *blind fanbase, also everyone agrees that guy cheated
The Levy drama was hilarious, it's time to admit it
@@Chakkaly These Indonesians fans made it 100 times better with their nonsense, I had a good laugh
Eric: why did you come here
Suspect: she told me we could play chess
That draw situation could have turned sour, good job on communicating well and making sure that didn't happen
2:40 "I should've played c3, I misplayed that."
Literally every move I've ever made. I see why it was bad the second I make it, no matter how long I think about it. Lol.
7:20 i love when i see cheaters playing all by themselves because they are in time trouble and they can’t use no more engines, it really shows how trash and stupid they are! Kooo
A year ago chess.com was fun. My chess rating went down from 1385 to 1085 because of this shit and I play everyday
@@sk818factory5 how that happened?!
@@MiSTeRJoKe96 too many cheaters on chess.com since chess started blowing up. It’s a joke
@@MiSTeRJoKe96 now when I play I open the profile and if the account isn’t at least a year old I just abort the game
Nothing compares to winning a good game on your own.
“Take a seat”-Eric
Hey, on the upside, at least you drew an engine cheater.
Someday I hope to be good enough to know what a weird move looks like
Why don't you take a seat? What did you bring the fork and skewer for?
“What are you 400lbs???” 😂
😆
Chris hansen would be proud
The only thing i can think is they delude themselves into thinking they just have an engine on for analysis or learning purposes, when really theyre using it to confirm every move and avoid any blunders. Otherwise what is the point? it's a boardgame what possible reason could you have for playing at all if you are going to use an engine
Trolling essentially. And chess is quite unique with its ability for anyone to cheat against anyone with relative ease. It probably gives these people great satisfaction to beat these top level guys even if it isn’t legit.
@@XzVanQuisHzX But they didnt beat them, everyone knows engines beat humans, so what point are they proving? i just cant put myself into their heads, is it hoping the player just thinks theyre really strong? Is that useful somehow to you? When you know you aren't? They're always on anonymous accounts too for obvious reasons, so what glory is there in beating anyone?
@@jimmierustler5607 My friends a psychologist and he explained his view like this, he assumes that cheaters in chess are similar to cheaters in other avenues of sports etc. In that they believe personally they are contributing to getting victories over the other player, they disassociate with the fact that they are artificially gaining an advantage over their opponents because they arent even equating the means of getting an advantage, with beating their opponent. It's an elaborate variant of cognitive dissonance basically.
@@tomsnow2872 Makes sense
@@jimmierustler5607 I suppose even though they’re not beating them legit , it still gives them satisfaction to be on the winning side against these top GMs. All of these guys are probably bad players and frustrated with the game , having the temptation to throw an engine on and beat anybody in the world is too much to abstain from. Add in anonymity to that and it makes it completely risk free. There’s probably a deep level of psychology that explains all this in regards to trolling, cheating, etc.
“Ooh... Something happened there, something happened, I don’t know what” me every time I I blunder a queen
2:53
“I’m going to get harassed quite a bit in the future.” He has no idea...
Most cheaters get banned within a week. I agree with Eric, they shouldn't allow new accounts to join the tournament and ruin the experience. Imo they should add a rule where only accounts that are 1 week or older are allowed to participate. Anyone else think this would be a good idea?
I second that
that will only work for one arena kings. next week the people with 1 week old accounts will infest the tourney anyways
Call out Rensch directly to fix the tourney eligibilty
"Pooja, take a seat"
tilts me so much when eric knows the guy is cheating and lets his time run down when its so easy to flag. just survive for 10 moves and you win
Me not knowing what arena Kings are:
I too would lose it if this happened to me
New accounts should NOT be allowed to play in tournaments.
Agreed!
*"there so many suspicious fuckers in this tournament"* yeah it sucks and there have been lots of abusers and new accounts which is stupid and should be stopped cause it just allows more of these people to pop up again and again which is annoying and i totally agree with you that its just idiotic on why they dont stop that
Hard not to feel really bad for Eric here
I think I have a fetish for cheater who run low on time and have to stop using their engine, and go from playing like a 3000 elo player to blundering 10 times in a row
The intro is lit
Chess sites : Having cheaters and hackers in their sites
Chess RUclipsrs : CONTENT !!!!!!!
On lichess you have to play X amount of rated games in each time control before you join its respective tournament, this is definitely needed on chess.com if you get that many cheaters lol
12:50 when eric plays among us
8:01 "What are you... 400lbs?" LOL
I missed the draw offer....hahahahhaa
I just found this channel and these videos are so funny and obviously the chess content is great
The personality difference between Eric and Aman is like the Grand Canyon. "you're by biggest fan, what are you 400-450?" WTF?
It was an hilarious joke, but I do hope his biggest fan have a good sense of humor haha
@@alexandrekilburg302 not based on one comment but months of watching them.
He was beating the shit out of me, then he was playing like a 1200 - LOLOLOLOL
"Danger" playing in the background.
I see what you did there.
nice.
omg...when they need 2 secs per move already in the opening like in the first game
Smurfing is when a highly-skilled player creates a secondary account as a disguise to play against less proficient opponents. This almost always results in the Smurf steamrolling their lower-level adversaries, which might be hilarious for the better player but usually leaves their victims bitter.
for some reason, these cheater and nasty comments videos are my favorite here
Some irony. How quickly we forget.
So what's the point with cheating? I mean you are only fooling yourself
i believe arena kings have some prize money, thats why there are so many cheaters.. but yeah, i agree, cheating is dumb
There is no point of cheating, some people do it because they like to feel what playing like a GM is, i suppose, i mean that guy, even tho he was cheating he beat jobava, i bet he will feel so proud about that, every game that allow some sort of cheating it’s 100% sure someone will cheat, and im not talking only about chess, the other day i wanted to play again after several years an old Call of duty (2009 released) on my ps3 and i still met several players cheating, i mean, they were cheating on a 2009 multiplayer game on 2021... they are just piece of shit as the one we met in chess
@@Pauliex33 but they cheat on blitz too, a lot...lately it seems like i play a cheater in 1 every 5 matches. Always the best move, keeps disconnecting, gets flagged when has mate in 2 because doesnt know what to do, etc
It's pornographic. Substituted simulation of the actual thrill, without having to put in the actual risks/efforts of the real thing.
The to catch a cheater edit at the beginning was brilliant
Cheaters are simply flooding chess.com lately. Sometimes I play 800s who just seem to find EVERY best move. They seem to lose some matches on purpose to disguise 93%+ accuracy wins against much higher rated opponents.
Agreed. I normally play on lichess with a 2000-2100 rating on all time controls. About a month ago I decided to start a new account on chesscom and started at 800 (I think). I thought I was going to bulldoze my way through the ranks. I was very wrong. I would say 30-40% of sub 1400 players are playing far above their rating level with many of them being very very suspicious. Its one thing if I hang a piece but many of them were playing very deep positional quiet moves error free which is just not possible for anyone sub 1800 (maybe sub 2000). I got completely crushed by players rated as low as 900 and a few others in the 1100-1200 range. My rating eventually jumped to 2000 on chesscom as well to put things in perspective. Anyway, I reported them and I hope you do too. The more we report them the harder it is for them to keep cheating. But needless to say I went back to lichess as I'm not a big fan of chesscom even without the cheaters.
Well i am 900+ and you create new account and you are not alone there is lot of ppl who are doing same. Now how the f i can grow bigger than 900+?
@@TheSadedz . I'm not sure if you directed part of your reply to me but according to chesscom my rating puts me in the 98% percentile so there are only 2% of players better than me. Logically, it should be a rarity for me to encounter a new account rated sub 1400 that can demolish me with a very high accuracy rate yet it happened far too often before my rating finally climbed.
Honestly if you're in the 800s range, it's very unlikely youre playing against cheaters. it's not impossible for your opponents to find good moves at that level, it's just that they make a ton of mistakes and you might not be able to detect or punish them. it's easy to say people are cheating to protect your own ego, but the more likely scenario is that you just need to get better at chess.
@@mineshaftrisotto . Without looking at each game individually its difficult to asses whether he played a cheater or not. We shouldn't assume that he hasn't played cheaters as there is no reason a cheater can't start a new account with an 800 rating. We all know online cheating is a constant problem as demonstrated time and again in our own games and streams by the likes of Eric (both Eric's actually).
Intro: How to catch a cheater
Video: Eric raging to 13 year olds cheating in chess tourneys
2 seconds for Nd7 after e4-e5. Then he plays b6 and needs another to second to play Bb7 the next move. It's great that so many cheaters are really bad chess players, I'm afraid 2300+ players would be much more difficult to catch, if they did it well.
I just dont get why there's not a threshold like you have to have 100 games to play in a tournament. Just some number of games where you would be able to track cheating behavior and it couldnt be a brand new account
how strong is the best egine now compared to deep blue that casparov played?
It is impossible to tell exactly, but if Stockfish 13 or even mediocre engine (mediocre in the comparison between the best engines) would play against Deep Blue, they would have an easy day.
Era in 90s and 00s was peculiar in chess between man vs. computer, because on those times it was not evident, which one is stronger. In early 90s the best humans were better and in late 00s the engines had surpassed them. Deep Blue won Kasparov 1997, but engines usable in normal PC probably reached the same level in the next decade.
In about 25 years human chess players have not developed nearly as much as engines (if they have developed at all, it is partly with the help of computers). Now there is no match, because it would be like man running against horse. For Deep Blue it would be the same treatment. Alpha Zero showed us few years ago new realms of chess, and now neural network is making the best engines even better. So, the difference to the times of Deep Blue is huge.
I found the exact same lichess cheater three times. Didn't even report it the third time just hit analysis on a few of his games. So always hit analysis after a game.
The first one was obvious based off him being 2400 blitz but having a 21 puzzle rush best
It's true they should. They probably weren't aware of creating that rule.
Eric Is so funny. Nice guy
hey how do you premoves like that? i can't drag the pieces to premove like he did