I’ve been there on days like that. I can’t imagine how much courage it takes just to try and get out there. When you see fins and boards wash up and nobody claims them, you wonder where the owners ended up. Scary crazy waves.
I know me and my cousin would of swam in here on this day, because we both love swimming in high dangerous waves, but we won't be swimming far in, or for so long
You said you've been out there on days like that, then say you can't imagine the courage to go out. Which one is it? You're full of doody. You prob spend your time swimming around little corona.
The memories of being a teenager and too cocky. Thinking I was invincible thus, several times I almost drowned like my grandfather in Hull, MA 1943. He was 42. RIP Always ✊ RESPECT THE OCEAN
For that people calling thoose waves less the 10 ft. The wave is falling down or breaking from creast to trough for example at 0:11 in 1,2 secundes. The free fall formula is h = 0,5 * g * t^2. So easy calculation: h = 0,5 * 9,81 (m/s^2) * (1,2 s)^2 = 7,1 m which is 23,3 ft. So "back measuring" don't know what it means. The faces ist 23 ft the amplitude is 11,5 ft (from x-axis to creast). Funny that every can meassure the high of the waves in front of the computer just like this.
@ 73 we may have shared a few in "our day" John. I do recall diving thru that wall of water splashing straight up at the feet of the onlookers and riding the backwash out to the next line-up; often holding onto a shifting ocean floor! Hope you are well ~ (Garth)
@@reggiebald2830 - at 76, I was probably there, too, in the 50s and 60s. I developed an underwater take off so as to come out further down the face and not have to make the drop.
@@phialpha_jude24 you’re spot on dude, the internet never lies ... ever .... I’d forgotten that truth and how well it’s served your county over the past few years now .... nice one ... can always trust the old intent ... yep .... for sure ... the inter ... net ... nice 👍
@@jacklucas4665 - no that is not what I am saying. I started bodysurfing there when I was 13. I am now 77. There were a few guys bodysurfing there then. Nobody was board surfing there at that time and sponge had not yet been invented . So, that was 1957, 54 years ago. As an adult, I lived in Hawaii until I was 65 and was still bodysurfing the big waves. I still have my Vipers! Given the opportunity, I would give it a go!
Nice crowd. Love the applause, all stoked about the power of nature. Also, the camera never gives waves their justice. Those were bombs. I wouldn’t doubt the bigger sets were at least 15-25 foot faces.
@@footycardstuff1232 it’s basically measuring in meters but saying it’s feet. A part of it is because it just gets generally big and people know the Hawaiian scale here the other part is slight underplaying the true size
I love watching these. Now as a noob who's never really surfed, I understand there are two ways to measure wave height, but my question is, for the surfing experience, wouldn't it make more sense to measure the full face height from the top where it's about to curl over, to the bottom where it's going to crash? Because that's what you're riding in, right? That's what you experience? Forgive if I look like I'm talking out my arse, I've been in smaller waves a lot but only know my physical experience with that.
Hawaiians and Australians usually call waves size on what a buoy would read as deepwater swell, or half the breaking wave height or even the size of the wave as measured from the back. It's pretty subjective and even they have disagreements on wave size as there are so many factors in play such as the local bathymetry of where the wave is breaking. I agree that measuring from the front is the most scientific and logical way to get an exact reading of a breaking wave face. The world record for largest wave ever ridden was 25' of deepwater swell but the bathymetry of Nazare canyon turned it into 80' face of a breaking wave(measured from the front). This hurricane swell in the video peaked at 10.5' @14 seconds so it's all very confusing as the wedge amplifies swell with constructive interference. I would say these waves are 10-12' hawaiian-10' austalian-25 foot californian-an exact measurement can be found by calculating the size of people in the water, measuring the size of the wave face, divide by ego and add prestige, then subtract location and finally a true wave size will be discovered.
I think when someone is taken out by the waves, you just multiply that height by 10. The higher the number the more interesting for the media and viewers.
Hey Cristofer Tamarit, do you have an email address at which we could contact you regarding this video? We would be interested to discuss a license to use this video if this is generally possible? (i.e. via email) :) Cheers, Felix
The camera definitely does NOT show how big the wave truly is, so I’ll give this guy that, but by no means is it 30 ft. The biggest wave was 18-20 MAX.
People calling this 8feet don’t understand measurement. Pause the video at the night peaks and look at the people. No way those peaks are less than 15 feet.
Casey Mullennix: isn’t that only people in Hawaii? What other logical reason, aside from some quirk of history, would someone chose to measure wave height by the back of the wave? Seems kind of silly.
You're encountering the ludicrous undervaluing of wave height in parts of the surf world. It's a stupid macho trip. "Hawaiian" count apparently originated in lifeguards there playing down wave height in media surf reports to discourage surfers from Waikiki (South Shore) coming to the big wave North Shore, in order to cut down on rescues needed. And I've NEVER met a surfer who measures waves from the back; I've been surfing 43 years. Least arguable way to communicate wave height is comparing it to an average adult's height: head high, head-and-a-half, double overheard etc. The bigger waves in this video are double/triple overhead- like you said, 15 feet minimum, heading toward 20. All these commenters are FOS.
laughs from anywhere in the world a surfer is quoting a wave height I’d say .... if you called that 20 to 30 ft. in West Oz, you’d be laughed out of the state, too ashamed to paddle out again ...
I stopped this video 2 times with the body surfer and the outside wave that nobody got...15’ to 18’ max. But to say 30’??? Nah, bradduh been out here when the poles were still on the jetty back in 1980’s and beyond with my UDT fins and then Viper Fins with the “Wedge Crew” Fred Simpson, Mel, Cashbox, Terry Wade, Beets and Romanaski. I sat out to the right of the peak and waited my turn being a “punk ass 16 year old from Hawaii” I believe it was called respect...or you got your A$$ kicked in. 🤙🏽😎
9 foot sets maybe the occasional 11 footers ,the place won't hold bigger ,the wedge V's up and always looks bigger cause of the way the peak rares up,waves are measured from the back mate just for future reference
@@masonmunkey6136 yeeeaaaahh nah .... regardless, all surfers play the face height down.... no way those waves would be called 20 to 30 ft anywhere in the world ...
Nothing in this clip is over about 15 feet. The set which arrived about the time the photographer lost control of the camera may've been 18, but there was nothing bigger. Peter Swanson Wedge local 1963 to '68
::DDD New new Hawaiin scale? Funny everybody has an other height of the waves. Because the wave is falling down or breaking from creast to trough for example at 0:11 in 1,2 secundes. The free fall formula is h = 0,5 * g * t^2. So easy calculation: h = 0,5 * 9,81 (m/s^2) * (1,2 s)^2 = 7,1 m which is 23,3 ft. So "back measuring" don't know what it means. The faces ist 23 ft the amplitude is 11,5 ft (from x-axis to creast).
There is point when the waves at the Wedge get so big that the waves off the jetty will over take the Main Peak and turn it into a big mush burger at first.
@@Aromatic-ring whooooaah whoah whoah .... whhoooaaaahb .... easy there Big man, Brycey J ... the Brysyter.... Bryceabrodude, The Brycenator, BJ .... yeeeeeahhh nah ... it was lucky to be 10 ft ... I’ll give ya 12-13” max for the bigger sets ... it also looks bigger cause it’s near the shore too , as opposed to open ocean breaks where the surf often appears smaller and less powerful from the shore ...
@@Aromatic-ring mmmmm ?? not sure what you mean there old pal ? I thought we were talking about the surf / waves /what they were catching ... swell means something slightly different in my books, and not something you could really measure from the vid shown ... any- who, nice weather we’re having ...
I mean no disrespect by any means, but why are people just hanging around getting wasted by waves? I don't even see any boards. I'm generally curious. Are conditions too rough to catch anything? Are they all photographers? I don't surf, just a huge and curious fan of the sport.
Eehmm wrong: Because the wave is falling down or breaking from creast to trough for example at 0:11 in 1,2 secundes. The free fall formula is h = 0,5 * g * t^2. So easy calculation: h = 0,5 * 9,81 (m/s^2) * (1,2 s)^2 = 7,1 m which is 23,3 ft. So "back measuring" don't know what it means. The faces ist 23 ft the amplitude is 11,5 ft (from x-axis to creast).
The cameraman was doing well but then he lost it, as so often happens. When will people realise that it's not enough just to buy the equipment, you have to know how to use it and panning the camera in this fashion is lesson number one on what not to do.
Old school style, local style, Hawaiian style? Funny everybody has an other messure methode of the waves. Because the wave is falling down or breaking from creast to trough for example at 0:11 in 1,2 secundes. The free fall formula is h = 0,5 * g * t^2. So easy calculation: h = 0,5 * 9,81 (m/s^2) * (1,2 s)^2 = 7,1 m which is 23,3 ft. So "back measuring" don't know what it means. The faces ist 23 ft so far away from 12-15 ft. The amplitude is 11,5 ft (from x-axis to creast).
I’ve been there on days like that. I can’t imagine how much courage it takes just to try and get out there. When you see fins and boards wash up and nobody claims them, you wonder where the owners ended up. Scary crazy waves.
The cross break waves are nasty.
Adf
I know me and my cousin would of swam in here on this day, because we both love swimming in high dangerous waves, but we won't be swimming far in, or for so long
You said you've been out there on days like that, then say you can't imagine the courage to go out. Which one is it? You're full of doody. You prob spend your time swimming around little corona.
The memories of being a teenager and too cocky. Thinking I was invincible thus, several times I almost drowned like my grandfather in Hull, MA 1943. He was 42. RIP Always ✊ RESPECT THE OCEAN
For that people calling thoose waves less the 10 ft. The wave is falling down or breaking from creast to trough for example at 0:11 in 1,2 secundes. The free fall formula is h = 0,5 * g * t^2. So easy calculation: h = 0,5 * 9,81 (m/s^2) * (1,2 s)^2 = 7,1 m which is 23,3 ft. So "back measuring" don't know what it means. The faces ist 23 ft the amplitude is 11,5 ft (from x-axis to creast). Funny that every can meassure the high of the waves in front of the computer just like this.
I remember a couple of days like this in my youth at Salt Creek!
July 24th, 1996
Jan 3rd, 1998
great
30ft? I'm 72, and I don't ever remember the Wedge that big! Even 20ft is a very rare occurence!
@ 73 we may have shared a few in "our day" John.
I do recall diving thru that wall of water splashing straight up at the feet of the onlookers and riding the backwash out to the next line-up; often holding onto a shifting ocean floor! Hope you are well ~ (Garth)
We used to measure from the back. These are 10-15 ‘ no more. It’s just So Cal hype. They want to sound tough
@@reggiebald2830 - at 76, I was probably there, too, in the 50s and 60s. I developed an underwater take off so as to come out further down the face and not have to make the drop.
I'm 50 ,so it's 8-10' peaks
heheheh
Everyone arguing over whether it’s 20 or 30 or 10.. who cares, they’re big waves lol. Most of y wouldn’t paddle out
HMMM THATS hmm ima say that's a carrot for sure.
you even surf bro ??
Then don’t caption the video 20-30 foot waves when it’s not lmao
@@phialpha_jude24 you’re spot on dude, the internet never lies ... ever .... I’d forgotten that truth and how well it’s served your county over the past few years now .... nice one ... can always trust the old intent ... yep .... for sure ... the inter ... net ... nice 👍
@@Schnaiblx lmaoo got me in tears bro
Back in the 50s we used to take off on the jetty side wave and try to make it across the bowl before getting worked!
Sure buddy
@@texhoward3348 true story!
Ok, so your telling me you were surfing before anyone there and your at least 80 years old?
@@jacklucas4665 - no that is not what I am saying. I started bodysurfing there when I was 13. I am now 77. There were a few guys bodysurfing there then. Nobody was board surfing there at that time and sponge had not yet been invented . So, that was 1957, 54 years ago. As an adult, I lived in Hawaii until I was 65 and was still bodysurfing the big waves. I still have my Vipers! Given the opportunity, I would give it a go!
Could you please translate that to English?
Nice crowd. Love the applause, all stoked about the power of nature. Also, the camera never gives waves their justice. Those were bombs. I wouldn’t doubt the bigger sets were at least 15-25 foot faces.
4 foot Hawaiian
Hawaii doesn’t have bigger shorebreak than this
Miles Tucker ya but it has bigger waves in general so....
@@footycardstuff1232 it’s basically measuring in meters but saying it’s feet. A part of it is because it just gets generally big and people know the Hawaiian scale here the other part is slight underplaying the true size
@@alexurmomma2401 yes they actually do, its called keikes
@@brodyschilling1352 keikis gets big af, but wedge is way better shore break when it turns on. keikis is just a closeout death trap when its big
I body surfed the wedge one time! I went over the falls into a big wipeout! It took me awhile to get out as I was hit by more big waves! 🌊
I would never even put a toe in at the Wedge and I’m a strong body surfer. Don’t need a broken neck.
@@u4riahsc lmao yea. I’ll just stick to Black’s beach in CA.
@@YukariAkiyama Blacks - I used to go there in the 80s. Too old to climb back up the cliff now.
On that huge wave , if you look up in upper right corner there is a body surfer who made the drop
No way is this 20 -30ft. and if you think it is then the waves I surfed in Southern Timor must have been 50ft.
R u fuckin stupid thats easily twenty do u not see how high they are over over surfer not all of em but the average
@@SRTKOVA yea u got a point they are at least 20 but not 30
I don't surf there unless they are 100 foot.
I love watching these. Now as a noob who's never really surfed, I understand there are two ways to measure wave height, but my question is, for the surfing experience, wouldn't it make more sense to measure the full face height from the top where it's about to curl over, to the bottom where it's going to crash? Because that's what you're riding in, right? That's what you experience? Forgive if I look like I'm talking out my arse, I've been in smaller waves a lot but only know my physical experience with that.
Hawaiians and Australians usually call waves size on what a buoy would read as deepwater swell, or half the breaking wave height or even the size of the wave as measured from the back. It's pretty subjective and even they have disagreements on wave size as there are so many factors in play such as the local bathymetry of where the wave is breaking. I agree that measuring from the front is the most scientific and logical way to get an exact reading of a breaking wave face. The world record for largest wave ever ridden was 25' of deepwater swell but the bathymetry of Nazare canyon turned it into 80' face of a breaking wave(measured from the front). This hurricane swell in the video peaked at 10.5' @14 seconds so it's all very confusing as the wedge amplifies swell with constructive interference. I would say these waves are 10-12' hawaiian-10' austalian-25 foot californian-an exact measurement can be found by calculating the size of people in the water, measuring the size of the wave face, divide by ego and add prestige, then subtract location and finally a true wave size will be discovered.
I think when someone is taken out by the waves, you just multiply that height by 10. The higher the number the more interesting for the media and viewers.
@@mybleachhouseI get what you’re saying there.
Home sick... Just yearly wedge action... Time for Cest si bon...
That's not 20/30 feet. No way.
12-15 possibly
40-60
150 feet easy
@@tnut3305 heheheh
6 ft
Imagine a ripcurrent in this
*there is*
Im australian and we would call that solid 8-10 feet
No, just 8 ft.
Maybe he meant 20-30 people got their feet wet.
That’s bigger than 8 ft mate
It was like that last time I was there. Just a monster set, came out of nowhere. About 14 or so. Then calm again.
@@alexanderhamilton8585
That's about what I was thinking 12 to 15 foot or so
6 to 8 no more than it
no way that's 30 I've been out in surf that big down in la Jolla and it was only like 10 feet
No it’s bigger than it looks. It’s easily 15-20 feet
Hey
Cristofer Tamarit, do you have an email address at which we could contact you regarding this video? We would be interested to discuss a license to use this video if this is generally possible? (i.e. via email) :) Cheers, Felix
Posted 7 years ago, I don’t think he will respond haha
I was body surfing the Wedge back in the mid 60's before the break water was put in, you want to talk about BIG.
The camera definitely does NOT show how big the wave truly is, so I’ll give this guy that, but by no means is it 30 ft. The biggest wave was 18-20 MAX.
System South After rewatching it like 7 times i guess u may be Right
15 feet
People calling this 8feet don’t understand measurement. Pause the video at the night peaks and look at the people. No way those peaks are less than 15 feet.
You count the back not the front
Casey Mullennix: isn’t that only people in Hawaii? What other logical reason, aside from some quirk of history, would someone chose to measure wave height by the back of the wave? Seems kind of silly.
Skiba Covers yeah but that’s not the point haha the point is the guy who made the video doesn’t know the size of the waves. Or it’s clickbait
You're encountering the ludicrous undervaluing of wave height in parts of the surf world. It's a stupid macho trip. "Hawaiian" count apparently originated in lifeguards there playing down wave height in media surf reports to discourage surfers from Waikiki (South Shore) coming to the big wave North Shore, in order to cut down on rescues needed. And I've NEVER met a surfer who measures waves from the back; I've been surfing 43 years. Least arguable way to communicate wave height is comparing it to an average adult's height: head high, head-and-a-half, double overheard etc. The bigger waves in this video are double/triple overhead- like you said, 15 feet minimum, heading toward 20. All these commenters are FOS.
tuskedbeast : well said. Measuring wave height from the back of the wave is absurd. The peaks in this video seem easily triple overhead.
I can’t believe all those people were out playing in it??
trainning for it
When people are clapping on the beach you know they're mostly from the I.E.
Nothing wrong with clapping
Fr bro I’m from sb n I been surfing for 15 years since I was 5 n ion clown people for clapping like tf😂 you probably surfed one time you kook
@@authenticdreamerz39 people surf a few times and think they’re in the “surf club” and can make fun of non surfers. It’s whack
@@eamonshields2754 that’s facts bro!
@@eamonshields2754
Hahaha.... Triggered much? 🖕🤣
It’s about to be summer in USA
Superb photography !
Hahahahaha. Good one
30 feet laughs in Hawaiian
laughs in naze
@@natharon You forgot two letters bud
laughs from anywhere in the world a surfer is quoting a wave height I’d say ....
if you called that 20 to 30 ft. in West Oz, you’d be laughed out of the state, too ashamed to paddle out again ...
@@natharon nazare
6 to 8 no more than it
Everyone would be laughing until they see the water receeding far
And I thought the 6 foot waves I were body boarding in were big
Thanks for the heads up this is cool
Exactly! Besides, left a digit off: 2-300' ~
Damn it’s crowded there
I stopped this video 2 times with the body surfer and the outside wave that nobody got...15’ to 18’ max. But to say 30’??? Nah, bradduh been out here when the poles were still on the jetty back in 1980’s and beyond with my UDT fins and then Viper Fins with the “Wedge Crew” Fred Simpson, Mel, Cashbox, Terry Wade, Beets and Romanaski. I sat out to the right of the peak and waited my turn being a “punk ass 16 year old from Hawaii” I believe it was called respect...or you got your A$$ kicked in. 🤙🏽😎
9 foot sets maybe the occasional 11 footers ,the place won't hold bigger ,the wedge V's up and always looks bigger cause of the way the peak rares up,waves are measured from the back mate just for future reference
People don't measure by the back everywhere.
@@masonmunkey6136 yeeeaaaahh nah .... regardless, all surfers play the face height down.... no way those waves would be called 20 to 30 ft anywhere in the world ...
@@aussiesurfer805 you've clearly never been to where I'm from lol
@@masonmunkey6136 you even surf bro ?
@@aussiesurfer805 yeah but we very rarely get waves much over head high
B.E.A.C.H....Best Escape Anyone Can Have.
the crazy part is they are possibly the worlds best body surfers if they can man handle that wave they can do any wave
In Hawaii that’s like 8 feet
6 to 8 maxxxxxxx
social surfer Sees 10 ft wave for first time ever "30ft" instantly
Pretty! ☺️
Great video. Had to turn the volume down those nerd tourists were annoying.
I don’t understand how the people in the water are having fun tho… I’m panicking for them
We love do that! Adrenaline!
Nothing in this clip is over about 15 feet. The set which arrived about the time the photographer lost control of the camera may've been 18, but there was nothing bigger.
Peter Swanson
Wedge local 1963 to '68
::DDD New new Hawaiin scale? Funny everybody has an other height of the waves. Because the wave is falling down or breaking from creast to trough for example at 0:11 in 1,2 secundes. The free fall formula is h = 0,5 * g * t^2. So easy calculation: h = 0,5 * 9,81 (m/s^2) * (1,2 s)^2 = 7,1 m which is 23,3 ft. So "back measuring" don't know what it means. The faces ist 23 ft the amplitude is 11,5 ft (from x-axis to creast).
There is point when the waves at the Wedge get so big that the waves off the jetty will over take the Main Peak and turn it into a big mush burger at first.
20-30 Please, not even close.
20 to 30ft MY ARSE. Put your glasses on 10ft Max!
0,20 to 0,30 ft ehehehehe
The way it sucks it’s self back out is so intense
Back breakers
Všetky ženy boli v závere krásne postriekané takmer až po prsia.
20-30 foot😂 do you know how to count?
Ik is crazy
Ye most of those were 10-15, maybe 20 on the gnarly outside sets.
@@Aromatic-ring whooooaah whoah whoah .... whhoooaaaahb .... easy there Big man, Brycey J ... the Brysyter.... Bryceabrodude, The Brycenator, BJ ....
yeeeeeahhh nah ... it was lucky to be 10 ft ... I’ll give ya 12-13” max for the bigger sets ... it also looks bigger cause it’s near the shore too , as opposed to open ocean breaks where the surf often appears smaller and less powerful from the shore ...
@@aussiesurfer805
Are you judging the swell or what?
@@Aromatic-ring mmmmm ?? not sure what you mean there old pal ? I thought we were talking about the surf / waves /what they were catching ... swell means something slightly different in my books, and not something you could really measure from the vid shown ... any- who, nice weather we’re having ...
8 ft
Aren't these people basically stuck in the sea? 😰
These are not 30 foot waves lady.
I didn't see anyone actually catching a wave? Those conditions are insane.
We love that!
2 waves were ridden. One bodyboard and on the largest you can just see someone bodysurf dropping in.
I mean no disrespect by any means, but why are people just hanging around getting wasted by waves? I don't even see any boards. I'm generally curious. Are conditions too rough to catch anything? Are they all photographers? I don't surf, just a huge and curious fan of the sport.
12 - 15 foot faces bascom method. Hawaiians measure the wave crest to trough from the back so this would be about an 8 - 10 foot day
Eehmm wrong: Because the wave is falling down or breaking from creast to trough for example at 0:11 in 1,2 secundes. The free fall formula is h = 0,5 * g * t^2. So easy calculation: h = 0,5 * 9,81 (m/s^2) * (1,2 s)^2 = 7,1 m which is 23,3 ft. So "back measuring" don't know what it means. The faces ist 23 ft the amplitude is 11,5 ft (from x-axis to creast).
These people are so cute, clapping for nature ☺️
You’re cute
20 - 30 inches
The cameraman was doing well but then he lost it, as so often happens. When will people realise that it's not enough just to buy the equipment, you have to know how to use it and panning the camera in this fashion is lesson number one on what not to do.
Hmmmmmm. Seems like we’ve got a mini Tsunami?
That was weird what was that weird wave running left to right under that big monster
That’s the wedge, kook.
Danger ⚠ I will not bathe in that beach, that water looks Treacherous.
OHH MY GOD LOOK ALL THE DEAD BODYS FLOATING
heheheh
Waves are measured from the back. These aren’t 30’.
Solid 12-15’ old school.
Old school style, local style, Hawaiian style? Funny everybody has an other messure methode of the waves. Because the wave is falling down or breaking from creast to trough for example at 0:11 in 1,2 secundes. The free fall formula is h = 0,5 * g * t^2. So easy calculation: h = 0,5 * 9,81 (m/s^2) * (1,2 s)^2 = 7,1 m which is 23,3 ft. So "back measuring" don't know what it means. The faces ist 23 ft so far away from 12-15 ft. The amplitude is 11,5 ft (from x-axis to creast).
Its more than just big it’s gigantic,like a tsunami!!!
20-30 feet? I don't think so..
heheh 6ft
I was there so sick
Those aren't even surfers just nutty swimmers geez
Thats 15 to 20ft where you going with 30ft!?
Some size, for sure. But 6' to 8'. Maybe 10' on larger sets.
1 ft Hawaiian
hehehehehehehhe 0,20 to 0,30 ft
Where are the 20 to 30 foot waves?
Title is clickbait. Largest sets are 6 to 8ft . Most others 5 to 6ft.
It’s like Nazaré
That’s pretty cool but im too scared of the ocean
Woo woohooo ooowooo
Why is there a life guard there🤔
That’s 15 ft normal double overhead Hawaiian
😮😮😮😰I'm afraid this😱😱😱, but thank you for this video👋
Nice ways
hi
25 feet doing a rapid comparison to a 64 feet image... there are better sports to this act of danger
20??? Na
I wouldn't want to be out there
6ft Hawaiian 😂 ....this day was huge
true heheheh
mate that is not 30 ft or even 20ft it is about 10ft max. stop click baiting ur titles
Deep crowd
@0:30
6ft
sorry. I live by it. That's not a 20 footer!
10-15ft.
Unridable
E bello
không chừng sóng thần 🌊
😃😃😃😃
꒦
Wow
Is like tsunami
Yeah, the women are always real brave until they get their ankles wet.