@@vic5015 Looking good in high res has nothing to do with the ridiculous size they chose for each ship to be. X-wings still look fine in high res and didn't need to be larger to look good
True though that really only applies to the Crossfield class, JJ Enterprise and maybe Sovereign (she was still big for her time but definitely out massed by the Galaxy variants and especially the Odyssey class.
There are a lot of errors in there. The Galaxy class isn't that small compared to the enterprise E. And comparing Kelvin timeline ships with prime is difficult.
The E is longer but actually a much lighter tonnage than the galaxy as it is a lot slimmer. It was from what I read the replacement for the Excelsior .
but not that much longer. The D is 645 meters and the E is 685 meters and because the saucer of the D is so wide, the D appears larger despite the few meters less.
I have a problem using JJ Abrams ships for this because they are not in the Prime Timeline. While still Star Trek in nature, it’s comparing apples to oranges.
I agree, but I think we'll have to get used to both timelines getting mixed up. Apart from channels that deal specifically with Star Trek or SciFi, nobody will care about the differences.
It´s Star Trek. Period. Don´t hear you complaining about other instances of "not the Prime Timeline" - which happened literally from TOS onward. Remember, a different "universe" in this context is nothing more than a variation of decisions and events, aka a different timeline.
But discovery ?.. at least Abrams has his own timeline.... discovery is the only star trek I will never watch, I tried, but when the ship wasn't just out of place, then it started spinning and disappearing and wtf was all that about..... discovery has no place,.. I have respect for Abrams 🤘✌️🖖
@@CaveManJohnCarter Maybe that´s too... difficult... for you? Discovery has it´s rough edges but it, like all Trek series, mostly got better over time. Also "Spore Drive" are the words you were looking for. Not any crazier than warp drives, transwarp and interdimensional rifts.
The Crossfield class. Do a search for Searvin with Captain Lorca. (I couldn't stop laughing) I agree with the assessment of the JJ reboot. Everything is bigger. 😄
USS Enterprise NCC-1701-J 26th century Star trek: Enterprise is the biggest Universal class starship flagship of the federation and battle of Procyon V! Ty for the video and LLAP!
is this an AI channel?? The voice is robotic, doesnt know its mentioning multiple timelines together as if they were the same, and I think all its data was obtained by data scrapping.
In the naval tradition, ships are categorized more by weight ( tons) than by size. Maybe Starfleet should go back to the aforementioned system. Anyhow, that was quite interesting to consider how many workers it took to built such flying cities!
Mothership networks as flying/floating cities are efficient to space exploration, and ship manufacturing value chains are true interstellar MEGA corporations and galactic members who has managed those systems.
@@robertfeld5829@robertfeld5829 I agree that it only really got good when they introduced Sevin of Nine and the various Borg episodes. I was disappointed in the ending as they didn't take the time to explore what happened to the crew when they reached home.
the first half of the video should be "Longest ships" not biggest. some of those were a tiny bit longer but much MUCH smaller than the galaxy. it was just getting smaller and smaller LOL.
The Kirk Enterprise, Kelvin timeline or not, isn’t anywhere near the size of the Enterprise D or E. and the Discovery isn’t bigger than any Enterprise at all
Well I rather highly prefer Galaxy class as my favourite on the list (however, I also preferred the Odyssey class ship named Enterprise F, yes but some wasted opportunity), indeed!
they can claim that but its total bs and makes no sence. A science/exploration vessel going toe-toe with a warships makes 0 sence. the Klingon are all about warfare yet there most WAR ships are on par with federation science or exploration ships.
Darn, you beat me to it, but I left a similar comment above. I wonder what their explanation is, or are they going to increase the size of all presiding ships to match?
It was a, uh, gravimetric anomaly that increased the size of the ship temporarily! That's why we got the giant Spock in TAS , it reacted with his Vulcan DNA and.. 😂
10,000 Starships all warp within a couple hundred feet of each other and just stand by kind of looks stupid to me if I'm being honest. You want to talk about a good way to destroy your entire fleet with just one false move. So dumb
I didn't know that the Kelvin timeline Enterprise was bigger than both the Enterprise-D and Enterprise-E . When I saw the Vengeance in Star Trek Into Darkness I thought it was comparable in size to the Enterprise-D .
You know as out dated Enterprise D is since "Generations", the last episode of Next Generation, there was an Enterprise D with 3 engines/ last episode of Picard could have shown a remade Enterprise D.😂
That’s one of the things I didn’t really get in Picard. The Galaxy class at that time was what, 40 years old? Still plenty of service life left going from the many Excelsior and Miranda class ships we saw during TNG era. Yet it seems like they were all retired. IRL the USS Nimitz is still kicking around despite being over 50 years old.
Galaxy-class ships achieved warp flight through two warp nacelles, which housed multiple pairs of warp coils. The acceleration delay between slow-reverse impulse and top warp speed, or about Warp 9, was 0.300 milliseconds. The maximum speed was warp 9.6, which could be maintained for approximately twelve hours.
This list is skewed... The first ships easily have MORE SPACE for people than most of the rest. All being judged by length (I'm not going there) and not taking into account width and height.
The size of the J.J. Abraham's Dreadnought is completely wrong. In the movie it is stated double the size of the constitution class which means double the size of the intrepid class.
If all of the sizes shown here were true, it would be preposterous. Going by the Discovery's dimensions, and seeing the 1701 Enterprise sid by side with it, there would have to be some universe breaking Q nonsense to explain how the Enterprise could be shrunk down by almost half during refit.
I was wondering about that, too. The dimensions given for the Crossfield seem way out of proportion - there´s no way Discovery is twice the size of a Constitution. But then again from what I read they also increased the Constitution in size by half to match it up.
@@robertmandl9326 Well most of that length comes from the silly, overlong engine nacelles. Meantime, the 'revamped' Enterprise in Strange New Worlds is supposedly, about 428 metres in length.
Yeah, I know I’m repeating the complaints of others, but I really feel there should be divisions of lists for the separate continuities of _Trek._ I also have my doubts if _Discovery_ and _Strange New Worlds_ (just to name two) are in the same timeline as the series that ended with _Voyager._ I’m not even sure if _Enterprise_ is really a part of the original continuity-and one could argue the Temporal Cold War kind of canceled that series out of the timeline…
That's what you do with stories, regardless of whether they are set in the past, present or future. The logic behind this is that you can only tell a story if it has already occurred.
abram’s isn’t cannon to the main star trek timeline also the galaxy class by volume is bigger then the ross and sovereign and should be higher on the list
@@CaptainPositron Trek was REVIVED thanks to especially the first movie, similar to what happened with the Transformers franchise through the Bay movies. You may like the Abrams movies or not, but you can not deny the effect they had - I doubt we´d have gotten as much Trek as we had during the last 15 years - and still do get - without those movies. Abrams put Star Trek back on the map.
@@robertmandl9326 Star Trek's viewership numbers may be full, but her spirit will be empty. All Star Trek content from that past 15 years has been utterly derivative. The JJ movies were all simplified rehashes of Wrath of Kahn, STD along with SNW are retconning prequels, and PIC heavily depends on nostalgia from TNG. For being "new" it seems oddly stuck in the past. Old Trek stands the test of time, NuTrek likely wont since it offers nothing of its own to be remembered.
The problem with getting rid of the Enteprise 1701-F so quickly and jumping into the Enterprise 1701-G in Picard season 3, is somehow that means the G, H, and I now need to last over 150 years. The average life span of an Enterprise is only 19.4 years according to ChatGBT.
All ships in this list except the Vesta are canon. The Trek definition of "canon" for a starship is "appeared on-screen in a movie or tv series". Tell me, do you know what IDIC stands for? And you dare to consider yourself a Trekkie.
Right after the Abrams crap started, I stopped the video. Guess where the thumb went. Since Star Trek in 2009 i've wanted time travel I would make a lot of people disappear.
Why does this AI only call out the name of the ship if it is Enterprise in that class. Why can't Ms AI just make-up a name for the other ships to make this video seem legit.
@@charlesdavis545 First the romulan incursion attack made by nero wich leaved a lot of tech and information not only about future tech but also the quadrant many threats. Second a inminent war with the klingons Third and i want to just tell this with a grain of salt they know about the temporal wars (thanks Daniels) because theres a multiverse out there and in Star Trek Online is pretty much shown how a kelvin timeline dreadnought ship (like the vengueance) is using a temporal rift to move from 1 to another in order to assist in the temporal war. This only matters when we take Star Trek Online (quite much a nexus for all star trek universes) as source. Despite this last point isnt referenced anywhere im very sure Marcus was aware of this because he was terrified in order to made a deal with the devil.
@@alvinbanks I respect your opinion but as a star trek online player i can assure you its very funny to use the kelvin, the typhon class ship and many other vessels like the cinidrian jellyfish they all seem to be special in something. Its very noticed the big love for star trek shows and again.... if you dont like theres nothing wrong with that.
Pretty sure the Abrams timeline Enterprise A isn't actually that big. That's some stupid ass shit. Also the Galaxy Class is actually bigger than the Sovereign and Vesta classes, it's just shorter. Length does not equal total size.
Too lazy to look up the rest to confirm, but I was pretty sure Constitution was ~300m and I was correct. Not only is it nowhere near the largest, its certainly nowhere near the longest. Train your AI better.
I'm sorry but the video is not so good because at first about the ships like Sutherland-Class und Ross-Class we know nothing in canon they just showed up in Star Trek Picard as background ships and Vesta-Class is not even canon it's a ship from Star Trek Online (Video Game) like the other two ships that I mentioned before. And a other thing the I realy found bad ist the so called in the video Constitution-Class II (Kelvin Timline) it's not the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-A it's just NCC-1701 it even is written on the ship of the picturs. And it's not the Constitution-Class II it's the first Constitution in this Timline and yes there is a known deleted scene from Into Darkness where we can see the OG Coni but that was cut from the film and so not canon. I'm sorry but is just misinformation.
This video needs a lot of redoing. Why does AI only call out the name of the ship if it is Enterprise in that class. Why can't Ms AI just make-up a name for the other ships to make this video seem legit.
The Galaxy-Class... if you take the schematics and do the maths, you see, that a height of 195 m is not correct. Depending on the schemtaics the height of the Galaxy-Class is between 137,5 m and 144 m. The top speed of the Galaxy-Class is not just Warp 9,2! It is Warp 9,6! And why did you include these ugly abominations from the Abramsverse? It is well known, that the numbers given, cannot be correct. There is too much proof against these claims of 725 m for the JJ-prise. More correct numbers are 366 m length.
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
The size of the Kelvin timeline ships are ridiculous
They were made to look good on high res HD movie screens. Plain abd simple.
@@vic5015 Looking good in high res has nothing to do with the ridiculous size they chose for each ship to be. X-wings still look fine in high res and didn't need to be larger to look good
They don’t even look good.
@@FS2K4Pilot they do, they look majestic.
@@IchigoKurosakicool Galaxy class looks majestic. Crossfield class certainly doesn't, and Universe class looks like a mistake.
Nice try, but a little more fact checking would have been in order.
Should rename it to longest ships...
True though that really only applies to the Crossfield class, JJ Enterprise and maybe Sovereign (she was still big for her time but definitely out massed by the Galaxy variants and especially the Odyssey class.
@@brentbartley6838 My guy the Galaxy is bigger than the 3 ships after it in terms of tonnage and surface area
There are a lot of errors in there. The Galaxy class isn't that small compared to the enterprise E. And comparing Kelvin timeline ships with prime is difficult.
The E is longer but actually a much lighter tonnage than the galaxy as it is a lot slimmer. It was from what I read the replacement for the Excelsior .
but not that much longer. The D is 645 meters and the E is 685 meters and because the saucer of the D is so wide, the D appears larger despite the few meters less.
@@RobotoMA the D is also has a much greater tonnage than the E
Especially with that bigass saucer section. lmao
Half of these ships are stretching the limits of what's considered canonical anyway.
I have a problem using JJ Abrams ships for this because they are not in the Prime Timeline. While still Star Trek in nature, it’s comparing apples to oranges.
I agree, but I think we'll have to get used to both timelines getting mixed up. Apart from channels that deal specifically with Star Trek or SciFi, nobody will care about the differences.
It´s Star Trek. Period.
Don´t hear you complaining about other instances of "not the Prime Timeline" - which happened literally from TOS onward. Remember, a different "universe" in this context is nothing more than a variation of decisions and events, aka a different timeline.
But discovery ?.. at least Abrams has his own timeline.... discovery is the only star trek I will never watch, I tried, but when the ship wasn't just out of place, then it started spinning and disappearing and wtf was all that about..... discovery has no place,.. I have respect for Abrams 🤘✌️🖖
@@CaveManJohnCarter Maybe that´s too... difficult... for you? Discovery has it´s rough edges but it, like all Trek series, mostly got better over time.
Also "Spore Drive" are the words you were looking for. Not any crazier than warp drives, transwarp and interdimensional rifts.
@@robertmandl9326it spins like a pedal on my bike. It looks setisfying, but its not as cool as a warp drive. I don like it
The Crossfield class.
Do a search for Searvin with Captain Lorca. (I couldn't stop laughing)
I agree with the assessment of the JJ reboot. Everything is bigger. 😄
Vengeance: Im the biggest Starship around here
Enterprise-J: hi!
Vengeance: i take it back :_D
AI video maker needs a positronic upgrade.
I'm guessing the Universe Class has it's own city with vehicles, buildings, lakes/parks and even an AI controled atmosphere inside it.
USS Enterprise NCC-1701-J 26th century Star trek: Enterprise is the biggest Universal class starship flagship of the federation and battle of Procyon V! Ty for the video and LLAP!
The creator of this content doesn't know what "biggest" means, this is a list of 10 "longest".
what do you expect from a computerised voice that can't pronunce names correctly.
This is obviously a length based evaluation as the Galaxy class had more volume than some of the others
Clearly this was made by someone who spends a lot of time defending their #2 pencil vs a Magnum Sharpie.
@@SmokePoppasounds like "they're compensating 👉______👈❌🤏✅ for something, eh?" Lol 🤭😆😂🤣
The AI commentator didn't do it's homework on Star trek 🤔😳😂😂
I believe that the Jupiter class was overlooked. Longer than the Vengeance, though still dwarfed by the Enty-J.
Jupiter class is non-canon
@@keyboardt8276the vesta class is beta canon like the Jupiter class
is this an AI channel?? The voice is robotic, doesnt know its mentioning multiple timelines together as if they were the same, and I think all its data was obtained by data scrapping.
In the naval tradition, ships are categorized more by weight ( tons) than by size. Maybe Starfleet should go back to the aforementioned system. Anyhow, that was quite interesting to consider how many workers it took to built such flying cities!
Mothership networks as flying/floating cities are efficient to space exploration, and ship manufacturing value chains are true interstellar MEGA corporations and galactic members who has managed those systems.
Nice list. However I agree about comments about not mixing in the rebooted movies. 💪🙂👍
Enterprise NCC-1701 for me the most iconic🛸
Correction, the Constitution II class is only 305 meters long according to all sources I've seen thus far on google.
early squad
That's the Motion Picture Prime Universe Enterprise, not the Kelvin Timeline Enterprise
I like the Sutherland class the most. I have a thing for the type of ships with the nacelles beneath the saucer.
I love the #Akira class, a re-imagined version of Archer's Enterprise.
@@charlesdavis545 Mm, that's also a good one.
@@robertfeld5829 My all-time favorite ship is #Voyager
@@charlesdavis545 Good ship, too bad the series NEVER reached a better potential.
@@robertfeld5829@robertfeld5829 I agree that it only really got good when they introduced Sevin of Nine and the various Borg episodes. I was disappointed in the ending as they didn't take the time to explore what happened to the crew when they reached home.
I think starfleet had a little more than 100 ships...
30,000 around the time of the Dominion War.
Yeah; remember the Dominion War?
Y'all I think they are referring to different models of ships, not the total number of ships.
The Vesta class isn't even canon, it's still in Apocrypha
the first half of the video should be "Longest ships" not biggest. some of those were a tiny bit longer but much MUCH smaller than the galaxy. it was just getting smaller and smaller LOL.
Riker: "tough little ship"
Worf:Little?(visibly irritated)
Riker:(holds up a hand with a bit of a smirk or smile which to me says "jk, fam")
Worf:(Calms back down)
The Kirk Enterprise, Kelvin timeline or not, isn’t anywhere near the size of the Enterprise D or E. and the Discovery isn’t bigger than any Enterprise at all
Galaxy had max warp of 9.6 for 12 hours.
Rule #1: You should not mix timelines
what happened to the USS Voyager - Intrepid Class
Much smaller, similar in size to the TOS Enterprise.
The Sovereign class is my favorite on the list.(However, my actual favorite ship is the Defiant,from DS9)
Agreed; I was so pissed they didn't end #Picard with her rather than that old ass Galaxy class.
Well I rather highly prefer Galaxy class as my favourite on the list (however, I also preferred the Odyssey class ship named Enterprise F, yes but some wasted opportunity), indeed!
@@charlesdavis545All 3 seasons of Star Trek Picard sucked. Now there's a rumor of a Picard Movie... how tired and stale for Trek these days.
You missed the Hercules class. Many trekkies miss that one.
odyssey class is by far my favorite
With very, very, very few exceptions ALL starfleet ships are dedicated science ships.
wish someone is telling this to the producers. Star Trek has become bammbamm-Action SciFi. Different designs, same as all others.
they can claim that but its total bs and makes no sence. A science/exploration vessel going toe-toe with a warships makes 0 sence. the Klingon are all about warfare yet there most WAR ships are on par with federation science or exploration ships.
Discovery screwing up ship sizes, it should have been a lot smaller instead of increasing the 1701 up to match it
Darn, you beat me to it, but I left a similar comment above. I wonder what their explanation is, or are they going to increase the size of all presiding ships to match?
@@DavidNicholson101 I feel essentially with SNW that if it isn't mentioned again people will forget and they can pretend it didn't happen.
It was a, uh, gravimetric anomaly that increased the size of the ship temporarily! That's why we got the giant Spock in TAS , it reacted with his Vulcan DNA and.. 😂
10,000 Starships all warp within a couple hundred feet of each other and just stand by kind of looks stupid to me if I'm being honest. You want to talk about a good way to destroy your entire fleet with just one false move. So dumb
Engage the molecular detachment device...
I didn't know that the Kelvin timeline Enterprise was bigger than both the Enterprise-D and Enterprise-E . When I saw the Vengeance in Star Trek Into Darkness I thought it was comparable in size to the Enterprise-D .
I'm just hoping they do a TNG reboot. I wonder how big their version of the Enterprise D would be! 😮
You know as out dated Enterprise D is since "Generations", the last episode of Next Generation, there was an Enterprise D with 3 engines/ last episode of Picard could have shown a remade Enterprise D.😂
That's a good point.
That’s one of the things I didn’t really get in Picard.
The Galaxy class at that time was what, 40 years old? Still plenty of service life left going from the many Excelsior and Miranda class ships we saw during TNG era. Yet it seems like they were all retired.
IRL the USS Nimitz is still kicking around despite being over 50 years old.
Galaxy-class ships achieved warp flight through two warp nacelles, which housed multiple pairs of warp coils. The acceleration delay between slow-reverse impulse and top warp speed, or about Warp 9, was 0.300 milliseconds. The maximum speed was warp 9.6, which could be maintained for approximately twelve hours.
So..."biggest" in terms of length, not volume or mass... I'm clicking off.
When was the F assimilated by the Borg? They really didn't do their homework
Spoilers......
Picard S3, I think it was the finale, when the Borg attacked Earth from their secret base inside Jupiter
I'm glad I came to the comments before actually watching the vid.
Universe class, Universe class, size of the entire universe and its chronometer has a minute hand, a millennium hand, and an eon hand...
This list is skewed... The first ships easily have MORE SPACE for people than most of the rest. All being judged by length (I'm not going there) and not taking into account width and height.
Missing the most obvious, weight or mass of the ships, which would be more indicative of true size.
The galaxy could achieve a top speed of 9.6 for 12 hours
The Galaxy class was introduced in the late 2350s. So you were immediately WRONG.
The space frying pan.
J.J. Abrams and Alex Kurtzman destroyed the Star Trek franchise by going against Gene Rodenberry!😂
Sovereign is smaller than the galaxy class
The size of the J.J. Abraham's Dreadnought is completely wrong.
In the movie it is stated double the size of the constitution class which means double the size of the intrepid class.
Kelvin timeline Constitution class is not the same size as Prime timeline Constitution class. so putting Intrepid class in there is pointless.
If all of the sizes shown here were true, it would be preposterous. Going by the Discovery's dimensions, and seeing the 1701 Enterprise sid by side with it, there would have to be some universe breaking Q nonsense to explain how the Enterprise could be shrunk down by almost half during refit.
I was wondering about that, too. The dimensions given for the Crossfield seem way out of proportion - there´s no way Discovery is twice the size of a Constitution. But then again from what I read they also increased the Constitution in size by half to match it up.
@@robertmandl9326 Well most of that length comes from the silly, overlong engine nacelles.
Meantime, the 'revamped' Enterprise in Strange New Worlds is supposedly, about 428 metres in length.
Yeah, I know I’m repeating the complaints of others, but I really feel there should be divisions of lists for the separate continuities of _Trek._ I also have my doubts if _Discovery_ and _Strange New Worlds_ (just to name two) are in the same timeline as the series that ended with _Voyager._ I’m not even sure if _Enterprise_ is really a part of the original continuity-and one could argue the Temporal Cold War kind of canceled that series out of the timeline…
How about comparing enterprise J with 31st century ships a Star Trek especially headquarters command ship
So why use past tense (noticed it for the Ross class) when all of Trek is in the future? I've noticed others do it, too.
That's what you do with stories, regardless of whether they are set in the past, present or future. The logic behind this is that you can only tell a story if it has already occurred.
So wrong. Kelvin timeline Enterprise is not that big. So many more. Fix the presenter, too. The Star Fleet's Federation of Planets??
I could even finish the video... AI voices are all over the place
Set to 1.25 speed if you don't want to fall asleep listening to it.
They ought to ban these goddamn AI voices.
The largest starship of the mall is a base star class starship
A lot of pizza cutters
abram’s isn’t cannon to the main star trek timeline also the galaxy class by volume is bigger then the ross and sovereign and should be higher on the list
I like warship type rather than science ship because it's.....Black.😅
Dreadnought is no a real Star Trek Class. Al of this movies is a parallel Storyline
Lose the computer generated narrator - it sucks!
The...AI...Voice...Is... hard.... to... listen.... to............................................
Kelvin timeline does not count. Different/Alternate/Fake Trek.
I called it a ' flying bedpan ' I never liked it - much!
Different and alternate yes, but not fake. What do you think helped revive the franchise?
@@RAdaltonracer Seems like it was more replaced than revived.
@@CaptainPositron Trek was REVIVED thanks to especially the first movie, similar to what happened with the Transformers franchise through the Bay movies.
You may like the Abrams movies or not, but you can not deny the effect they had - I doubt we´d have gotten as much Trek as we had during the last 15 years - and still do get - without those movies. Abrams put Star Trek back on the map.
@@robertmandl9326 Star Trek's viewership numbers may be full, but her spirit will be empty. All Star Trek content from that past 15 years has been utterly derivative. The JJ movies were all simplified rehashes of Wrath of Kahn, STD along with SNW are retconning prequels, and PIC heavily depends on nostalgia from TNG. For being "new" it seems oddly stuck in the past. Old Trek stands the test of time, NuTrek likely wont since it offers nothing of its own to be remembered.
Its such a shame these ships are not for real haha
The problem with getting rid of the Enteprise 1701-F so quickly and jumping into the Enterprise 1701-G in Picard season 3, is somehow that means the G, H, and I now need to last over 150 years. The average life span of an Enterprise is only 19.4 years according to ChatGBT.
Interesting
The JJ verse enterprise don’t count it ain’t Trek.
JJ versus is called Faux Trek
Mom: We have Star Trek at home
I look forward to the future star trek where I can see the beautiful enterprise J in full effect, I love flying the ship myself
Are you ok?
@@alvinbanks no I'm pretty serious and so is CBS considering.
This is So Coolest my friends. Thanks.
No it isn't.
Redo this list but with only canon prime timeline ships as well as canon ships.
All ships in this list except the Vesta are canon. The Trek definition of "canon" for a starship is "appeared on-screen in a movie or tv series".
Tell me, do you know what IDIC stands for? And you dare to consider yourself a Trekkie.
Dwarfs compared to a Ras Tschubai, Sol or Base
In ds 9 during dominion war a fleet flew to the breen (?) 28 came back from 112. So it must be far more ships.
Since when did we switch from ft to meters
Metric rules.
Galaxy class can reach warp 9.6, with a theoretical 9.8.
Boo at those JJ ships
Yeah, they're butt ugly. Ships on steroids.
Right after the Abrams crap started, I stopped the video. Guess where the thumb went. Since Star Trek in 2009 i've wanted time travel I would make a lot of people disappear.
not sure why the kelvin connie was called the connie II or the enterprise A but ya know...
There was an Enterprise A shown at the end of Beyond. Oddly it looks more like the original Enterprise than the first Kelvin timeline Enterprise did..
@@EdKolis thats what I meant, but in this video, the enterprise we see is just the 2009 enterprise which was just kinda wierd
@@Random_Ent oh, I didn't even notice it was the wrong one!
Do the smallest Starships
Why does this AI only call out the name of the ship if it is Enterprise in that class. Why can't Ms AI just make-up a name for the other ships to make this video seem legit.
In the kelvin timeline federation ships surelly are bigger because they are a product of a bigger threat.
Like who? There aren't any #Borg or #Dominion.
@@charlesdavis545 First the romulan incursion attack made by nero wich leaved a lot of tech and information not only about future tech but also the quadrant many threats.
Second a inminent war with the klingons Third and i want to just tell this with a grain of salt they know about the temporal wars (thanks Daniels) because theres a multiverse out there and in Star Trek Online is pretty much shown how a kelvin timeline dreadnought ship (like the vengueance) is using a temporal rift to move from 1 to another in order to assist in the temporal war.
This only matters when we take Star Trek Online (quite much a nexus for all star trek universes) as source.
Despite this last point isnt referenced anywhere im very sure Marcus was aware of this because he was terrified in order to made a deal with the devil.
@@christianrissotto.gordohom3478 Sorry but, Star Trek died right after DS9 ended. All this other stuff calling it's self Star Trek is just BS.
@@alvinbanks I respect your opinion but as a star trek online player i can assure you its very funny to use the kelvin, the typhon class ship and many other vessels like the cinidrian jellyfish they all seem to be special in something.
Its very noticed the big love for star trek shows and again.... if you dont like theres nothing wrong with that.
Oh…Star Trek *Online* ships…
You all do realise this is not real, they do not exist.
Pretty sure the Abrams timeline Enterprise A isn't actually that big. That's some stupid ass shit. Also the Galaxy Class is actually bigger than the Sovereign and Vesta classes, it's just shorter. Length does not equal total size.
Don't like the AI voiceover.
Too lazy to look up the rest to confirm, but I was pretty sure Constitution was ~300m and I was correct. Not only is it nowhere near the largest, its certainly nowhere near the longest. Train your AI better.
This is the Constitution class from the Kelvin timeline movies. It's much bigger due to that timeline's advanced construction technology.
You're using a lot of information from STO which is *NOT* canon.
I'm sorry but the video is not so good because at first about the ships like Sutherland-Class und Ross-Class we know nothing in canon they just showed up in Star Trek Picard as background ships and Vesta-Class is not even canon it's a ship from Star Trek Online (Video Game) like the other two ships that I mentioned before. And a other thing the I realy found bad ist the so called in the video Constitution-Class II (Kelvin Timline) it's not the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-A it's just NCC-1701 it even is written on the ship of the picturs. And it's not the Constitution-Class II it's the first Constitution in this Timline and yes there is a known deleted scene from Into Darkness where we can see the OG Coni but that was cut from the film and so not canon. I'm sorry but is just misinformation.
It could have been a 4 minutes video if there wasn’t this slow, annoying AI voice
USS vengeance is the best looking federation ship in star trek ever
That ship was Borg Ready.
Are you alright?🤔
@@alvinbanks are you?🤔
Excalibur class?
I much prefer the Congo class alternative to the J that Drexler did.
I do as well beautiful design..I've got a model of it made from two broken smaller Ent Js from eaglemoss..
6:19 It's use for the war
I love the copy-and-paste 1000X starships of the Jar Jar Abrams universe
Why would you want 100 different classes of ships? That's going to be a maintenance nightmare.
Everyone about the Kelvin time line ships being here?... im like... wtf is discovery here? Discovery can us that spore drive and get lost 👉 lol 🤣🤣✌️
Nice video, but it seems like it was written by a child.
This video needs a lot of redoing. Why does AI only call out the name of the ship if it is Enterprise in that class. Why can't Ms AI just make-up a name for the other ships to make this video seem legit.
❤❤❤
Shoutout STO
The Galaxy-Class... if you take the schematics and do the maths, you see, that a height of 195 m is not correct. Depending on the schemtaics the height of the Galaxy-Class is between 137,5 m and 144 m. The top speed of the Galaxy-Class is not just Warp 9,2! It is Warp 9,6!
And why did you include these ugly abominations from the Abramsverse? It is well known, that the numbers given, cannot be correct. There is too much proof against these claims of 725 m for the JJ-prise. More correct numbers are 366 m length.