Top 5 Cheapest Bush Airplanes 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 авг 2022
- If you’re searching for bush planes, this video will touch upon some of the most affordable and reliable models available on the market. We’ll look at their current price and technical specifications, as well as their interiors or cabin setup. Watch the whole episode so you can see our top pick!
Bush airplanes were initially designed for Canada's remote north and the harsh environments of Alaska. These are essentially piston-engine aircraft outfitted with skis, tundra tires, or floats. They feature high-mounted wings that offer more clearance and help reduce damage while loading and larger flaps that help performance on short-field takeoffs and landings. Nowadays, bush planes are used all over the world, from New Zealand's rugged mountains, and Kenya's dry deserts, to the lush Amazon jungles. They're the perfect aircraft for daring, non-traditional pilots.
🛩️ If you enjoyed this episode, give us a LIKE, write a COMMENT, and SHARE the video!
🛩️ SUBSCRIBE and click the notification bell to get up-to-date with new uploads!
FOLLOW US:
/ aviationfederation
DONATE HERE:
www.buymeacoffee.com/AviationTV
OUR PLAYLIST:
• Top 5 Cheapest Private...
MORE VIDEOS:
Top 3 Most Popular 6-Seater Single-Engine Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
• Top 3 Most Popular 6-S...
Top 5 Cheapest Personal Aircraft Under $25K 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
• Top 5 Cheapest Persona...
Top 5 Cheapest Classic Single-Engine Piston Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price Comparison
• Top 5 Cheapest Classic...
EXTRA INFO:
Zenith STOL CH 701
© Zenith Aircraft Company
Max Cruise Speed: 85.16 knots
Gross Weight: 1100 lbs
Fuel Capacity: 20 gal
Passenger Capacity: 4
Price: Starts at US$ 29,485.00
Murphy Radical
© Murphy Aircraft Manufacturing
Max Cruise Speed: 112 kn
Gross Weight: 1900 lbs
Fuel Capacity: 44 gal
Passenger Capacity: 2
Price: Starts at US$ 35,900.00
Just Aircraft Superstol
© Just Aircraft / Keith Showalter
Max Cruise Speed:86.90 (100 mph)
Fuel Capacity: 27 gal
Gross Weight: 1550 lbs
Passenger Capacity: 2
Price: Starts at US$ 41,700.00
Kitfox Series 7 Speedster
© Kitfox Aircraft
Max Cruise Speed:112.97 knots
Fuel Capacity: 27 gal
Gross Weight: 1550 lbs
Passenger Capacity: 2
Price: Starts at US$ 41,995.00
Barrows 4-Place Bearhawk
© Bearhawk Aircraft
Max Cruise Speed:130.35 knots
Fuel Capacity: 50 gal
Gross Weight: 2500 lbs
Passenger Capacity: 4
Price: Starts at US$ 61,000
OTHER VIDEOS:
Top 5 Bush planes In The World
• Top 5 Bush planes In T...
The Strongest Bush Plane in the World
• Video
TOP 5 BUSH PLANES - LSA Edition
• TOP 5 BUSH PLANES - LS...
DISCLAIMER:
The views expressed in our videos are our opinions and may not necessarily reflect those of the companies we feature.
Our content abides by the terms of Fair Use for education and commentary and the clips we feature in our editorials are owned by their respective copyright holders. The clips presented are for informational and non-commercial purposes only. For any business, media, or partnership inquiries, comment below or email: legal@emotionmedia.net
#BushAirplane #BushAircraft #PersonalAircraft #AviationFederation 
Наука
*Is it pronounced as “stol” or “s-tol”? We’ve heard both, so please sound off here in the comments section! To see more interesting aircraft videos, check these out:*
Top 3 Most Popular 6-Seater Single-Engine Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
ruclips.net/video/3jtu9iaHytc/видео.html
Top 5 Cheapest Personal Aircraft Under $25K 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
ruclips.net/video/_yB9KMzvMBk/видео.html
Top 5 Cheapest Classic Single-Engine Piston Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price Comparison
ruclips.net/video/M3aWHExpZjw/видео.html
It is pronounced "stol" as said by multiple manufacturers
Great video. One correction in the description of the video, the Zenith STOL CH-701 can only hold 2 passengers. The big brother, the CH-801 (which we own) can hold 4, but is more expensive.
Short takeoff or landing .
Keep in mind that you can expect to spend an additional $80-100k on top of the kit price to finish it; the kit prices doesn't include avionics ($30k or so), engine ($40k) and paint.
Thank you for the additional information regarding the cost of finishing a kit-built aircraft. It's important to keep in mind that the initial kit price is just one part of the total cost of building an aircraft, and there are many additional expenses that can add up quickly. Builders will also need to factor in the cost of tools, materials, and any specialized equipment or services that may be required.
thank you! knowing what an old used Cub or an ultralight costs, I knew there was something wrong with obtaining an actual airplane for that price, even if I had to put it together! it’s easy to get excited though, so better to be let down now. 🥲
That’s fkn depressing
All excellent planes in their own right. All have strengths and weaknesses. Aluminum vs fabric vs Carbon fiber. Carburetor vs Fuel Injection. Steam gauges vs Glass cockpit. Stored in a Hangar vs Outside. Float/ ski capable? The kit prices (Amateur Home Built) never includes the Firewall forward (engine, exhaust, coolers, sensors, cowl), Propeller ($2-12,000), Panel, paint and / or finishing. As an aircraft builder, count on 2-5X the kit price to complete. Experienced builder with a work space count on 18 months to build. Inexperienced builder working in a home garage 3-10 years. Advantage to Home built is owner maintenance (huge cost saving - annual and routine service). Down side - documentation of the builder using Approved Aeronautical Building Standards or are they using the local hardware / auto store. Yes, the plane will be examined prior to first flight but what then later? Cheap bolts fracture. Non aviation Rivets corrode. Lots of sketchy stuff flying.
Pilot blue: well done.👍 Good info.
Maximum Flight travel range should be shown in Discription box...if not displayed
Zenith stol ch701 is my choice, the tundra tyre would be fun.
Nice video,I was looking for some good basics of the best planes in this category, this one gave me what I was looking for
Hi Sophie, i love all planes but the Superstol is just amazing. Nice video, keep up the good work.
My Grandfather took me to the little airport a few miles from their house.
We'd sit in the car and watch the single engines take off and land.
Still remember Fleet Week in the SF Bay and the Blue Angels flying under the bridge while standing on a submarine. 👍
It sounds like you have some wonderful memories of aviation! We can imagine how exciting it must have been to watch the planes take off and land, as well as witnessing Fleet Week and the Blue Angels in action. Those experiences must have truly left a lasting impression. We enjoy reading aviation stories like this. Thanks for sharing!
I am in my 13 th year of scratch building my four place 260hp Bearhawk, according to my understanding it is one of the best in its class, ranging from the two place all the way to the 6 place in five models. Cant wait to fly mine
Hahaha really
Hello from India. We should manufacture such beautiful planes in India ...these could be so useful in remote areas ...for supplying essentials ✨️ 👌 😍
Get to it!
Excellent stuff bro
Love them all👍
Mẫu phi cơ của bạn rất tinh tế và ấn tượng, hay lắm cảm ơn video chia sẻ của bạn chúc bạn sức khỏe và hạnh phúc.
Cảm ơn những nhận xét tích cực của bạn về mô hình máy bay! Rất vui vì bạn thích video này. Nếu có bất kỳ điều gì khác mà bạn muốn biết hoặc thảo luận về máy bay, đừng ngần ngại bắt đầu cuộc trò chuyện.
The only taildragger planes I have flown are the Aeronca Champ and Decathlon.
The Zenith 701 cannot take 4 passengers. The 750 cannot even take 4.
Go with the 801 then.
From Wikipedia, "Phone Booth Stuffing":
"On March 20, 1959, students at the Durban, South Africa YMCA set a world record when 25 of them were able to squeeze at least the greater portions of their bodies into a standard upright phonebooth."
Just sayin'...
I have some experience with some bushes; They’re very beautiful to look at✨
I got into one. And man like to have not gotten out. But as A. Good. Warrior I went. Right back in til it was. Trimmed.inside out
All are awesome
You have a lot of freedom in America, here in Spain you can make a kit plane but you need a lot of certificates so its cheaper to buy an already built one
I would prefer the Zenith , due to its retractable wings .
I'd love to get a Zenith CH801 as it's a four seat version of the 701. Though it doesn't have the retractable wings . . .
So which one is the klr650 equivalent? Cheap, reliable takes a beating, does everything but not well.
I noticed that you included the Kitfox aircraft speedster instead of the STI version which has beefed stol performance
That’s right. We might update this list with more value for money options soon.
I just saw a separate vid on the Zenith. The claimed takeoff AND landing distance is 100 ft., with a rate of climb of 3000-4000 ft/min. That's what the manufacturer SAID, anyway. This is for the SuperSTOL XL (extra long?). The upped the HP from 100 to 180, and extended the fuselage 2 ft., moving the CG aft to compensate for the heavier engine.
What is the range of each of these aircraft?
They don't talk about rollout, landing distance, or endurance, either, but I expect that the websites for each plane would list those data.
Advantages/disadvantages of these STOLs versus say gyroplanes? They're both equally slow, but I've seen STOL experts take off in less than 30ft. in competitions.
What's an "advantage" or "disadvantage"? You have to know what you WANT the aircraft to do. If you just want to get in the air the fastest, and don't care about anything else, then maybe a gyrocopter, if you're not one of those experts you mentioned.🙄
So much time to build these planes, but worth it
The prices might be for unassembled kits without engines or avionics. They definitely aren’t for completed aircraft.
buy used cessna can buy million used cessna 172-182 in usa, most popular plane what has made and used can buy 20K-50K normal 30K can buy ready to fly condition good cessna.
@@mattivirta new vs 50 year old plane needing engine overhaul. Decent 1970s 172 is around $80K.. Again, new vs 50 years old. No wrong answer, just different plane.
40 inches wide? That is my shoulder to shoulder measurement. Lol
"This kitfox costs over $41k US". The video isn't wrong... the green and black one from the video is up on trade-a-plane right now for $195k. That certainly is more.
Still a kit in parts, or has somebody built a kit into a fully finished, flying aircraft? That could have something to do with it.
Greenhorn aboard… 🇺🇸♾️😎
Супер!!!
The Zenith STOL CH 701 can accommodate up to four passengers? But if you want to take off you need to just have two, you know, in the two seats.
Yes, you're absolutely correct. This ensures that the aircraft remains within its weight and balance limits and maintains safe operating conditions during this critical phase of flight. Apologies for the oversight!
I wouldn't trust anything you hear on RUclips ... this channel seems like AI with a bot voice transcript
I wonder which dealer has the prices you mentioned. must be fire wall back prices?
Yeah the price is right with out instruments and engine that would be more like $60,000
Ch 701 4 seat ...... come on ... this video is full of mistake
. you talk about canada bush flying ... but you dont have the levitation and pegazair aircraft who are specific desigh in canada for canada .
Love from India🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Flew a 170 in Ak for over 20 years - soooo What size engines are in these birds - that's kind of Important !
That's amazing and you're absolutely right; the size and type of engines are crucial factors in evaluating aircraft performance. We'll do our best to add more relevant information in our future episodes.
Opps. Lush Amazon..... All the trees in the background were Douglas fir. They don't grow anywhere near the Amazon
Approx Flight Travel range should be shown
Murphy radical is the best
With only 2 Radical flying, how can it be the best? The Murphy Rebel should be on this list based on price and actual flying "bush" airplanes.
I don’t like the limited visibility out of the cabin
I think light sport or less than 1320 GVW is a better way to go, like a Carbon Cub for instance.
If all you're taking from A too B is yourself, then could be. It just depends on what you want out of your plane. "Better" is a subjective term. If somebody wants to haul cargo, or get there quicker, have a higher ceiling or more range, "better" would probably be different for them.
EDIT: That's, "A TO B". I hate spell-check.
like the video good job.... prices are a bit off i think.... double or more for most part
I have to say that the whole concept of seeking out the cheapest plane to trust your life to in the harsh flight environment of the bush is very much like looking for the lowest bid from a brain surgeon. In 6 years in Alaska my son's pastor and two passengers flew off apparently to be wth God, since they've never been seen since. a Beaver with six people was struck by another two seater flown by a State rep...all 7 people died in my son's back yard. I did meet an 85 year old bush pilot in Anchorage who had walked away from a handful of crashes. But really, guys, a bush plane is only a couple of steps safer than jumping off a mountain in a Wing Suit.
We can understand your concern and apprehension regarding the safety of bush planes. It is true that flying in small aircraft, particularly in remote areas with harsh weather conditions, can be inherently risky. However, it is also important to note that many bush pilots are highly experienced and well-trained individuals who take safety very seriously. Ultimately, it is up to each individual to weigh the risks and benefits of flying in a bush plane, and to make an informed decision based on their personal comfort level and safety concerns.
@@AviationFederation when I worked for the air force at Tinker AFB just out of college I met a lot of small plane enthusiasts. Many had bought surplus Stearman's after the war. Heard no horror stories, although I met one guy who had lived on an acreage outside Wichita with a Supercub? Who took off by attaching a cable to a swiveling post and going round and round in a circle till he was airborne and then releasing the cable. But once I spent time in Alaska I realized that an awful lot of the pilots I met or heard about tended to think flying was just only slightly different from driving a car. Not true at all, I thought your article might appeal to folks like that. Lost a couple of good friends in S Texas flying home from Houston (school architect and two school board members) because the red hang tag in the cockpit that showed some of the controls were locked had faded and torn in two. Crashed on takeoff. And then there was the local young crop duster took up the elementary school librarian to show her how safe flying was. Fatal crash in a cotton field outside Sinton. My wife's uncle and his brother flew commercial jets for their whole working life. In their 80's now, so obviously......a safe pilot is one from the deep end of the gene pool.....shallow end maybe not (I would count myself in the shallow end, based on 50 years of mishaps).
Living here for over 40 years I know many people who went right from flying a plane to getting angel wings. I’ve had jobs where I was flown all over the state in different types of aircraft from Beavers on floats to Citation Jets and helicopters. I’ve had a few exciting flights. I even had a 7ECA Champion for 8 years about 40 years ago. It cost only $9,000 in 1985.
Well said, AF.
Bearhawk
I bet if you tried you could find even more annoying foreground music, since it sure isn't background music.
the kitfox series 7 speedster is not a bushplane.
the kitfox series 7 STI however is a bush plane.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
There’s no such thing as cheap and aircraft being used in the same sentence. That will get you kicked off social media for misinformation 😊
This kind of bush planes are by far better than girocopters.
Number one I am number two. Buy me one I like the blue one
What if gear of tyre should be tilted into body..
You mean retractable landing gear? Not done for this class of aircraft. Too complex, too heavy, too expensive, with unnecessary maintenance.
Much confusion in the title and description. The price you mention are kitprices and not that of a finished one. No engine, not elecronic and instruments. Showing the Kitfox Speedster that is the acro version of the S7 say everything.
I think these are prices without engines - because no way these aircraft are these cheap
What about Maule or Carbon Cub, too expensive?
While the pricing varies, Maule and Carbon Cub are generally considered valuable investments for those seeking robust performance in bush flying. Do you have specific features or requirements in mind for a bush plane that you find essential?
None of these numbers are accurate.
Pure bullshit whole video
Kitfox
I think Bush airplanes amazing but I think that they fly only in US, just because I have never seen one of them here in Brazil.😮💨😮💨😮💨
Bush airplanes are indeed incredible, designed for rugged terrain and remote locations. While they are commonly associated with the United States, their popularity extends beyond its borders. While it may be less common to see them in Brazil, there are enthusiasts and pilots who appreciate the versatility and capabilities of bush planes worldwide. While the specific models and availability may vary by region, the spirit of bush flying and adventure can be enjoyed in various countries around the world.
@@AviationFederation thanks 4 the feedback
Hinged from the top,opens from the bottom. Zenith 701 four passengers I doubt it. 200 lbs x4 =800 lbs with a gross weight of 1100 lbs.
You raise a valid point regarding the passenger capacity of the Zenith 701. The calculation of passenger capacity should take into account the weight limitations and ensure that the aircraft remains within its maximum gross weight and center of gravity limits. Thank you for pointing out our oversight. It's important for pilots and operators to thoroughly understand and adhere to the aircraft's limitations to ensure safe and compliant operations.
Prices are definitely not up to date... or maybe they are the kits' prices with no engine nor instruments.
Prices are clearly kit prices WITHOUT engine (30K-40K), without avionics (minimum 20K-40K), and without paint (10K-$20K)..
How do you fit 4 people into a CH701?
2 in the seats and 2 on top of the wings. Lol
CH 801 it's a 4 place ulm
@@juanbaitx8740 perfect have small economy 4-seat plane. go to city to city cheap plane shopping or holiday trip.
Speedos or bikinis (depending), cocoa butter, and a big shoe horn. Preferably, they'll also all be good at "Twister".
Or make the 3 who are not the pilot 6 years old or less.
Multiply prices by factor of 5
THAT BARROWS TAKES OFF AS SHORT AS A CHINOOK.....AND YOU GET
A REAL PLANE
MOUL???
STOL short takeoff or landing. Just say The word. 2 passengers only though.
If you want real value in a bush plane just buy used Maule M-4 or 5. They are powered by real airplane engines, not the snowmobile engine powered airplanes you recommended.
ob es je möglich sein würde, ein kleines flugzeug zu bauen, welches nahezu jeder autofahrer fliegen könnte ?
Es gibt Experimentalflugzeuge, die Sie ohne Lizenz fliegen können, aber wir empfehlen es nicht.
@@AviationFederation das war ja nicht meine frage...ich kann mir sogar als laie vorstellen, wie schwierig das umzusetzen wäre...es geht also um die konstruktion eines fliegers, der mit hilfe eines pc und eines fluglaien zu fliegen wäre...ich sehe das ja auch in einem anderen bereich = boote. selbst segeln würde n laie so hinbekommen, dass er wieder nach hause kommt. die konstruktion ist da allerdings schon komplizierter als bei einer motoryacht...aber lieben dank für die antwort.
A kit plane is not cheap. Kinda tired of these videos alleging such an erroneous contention. To make a full and fair apples-apples comparison of aircraft prices you MUST include the cost of the engine (not included in kits), avionics (not included in kits), and the gorilla in the room, the LABOR to complete the build.
You raise a valid point. While kit planes may appear to be cheaper than ready-to-fly aircraft at first glance, the additional costs you mentioned, such as the engine and avionics, can add up quickly. Furthermore, building a kit plane requires a significant investment of time and labor, which must also be factored into the total cost. That's precisely why many enthusiasts consider this a labor of love! It's essential to carefully consider all of these factors before making a decision about whether a kit plane is a cost-effective choice for your aviation needs.
5 Cheapest? Not by a mile. For example, where is the Savannah?
Al do a savannah is great airplane actually the best ive flown but unfortunately they aren't as popular in the US its mostly the zenith that is similar
Hmm. Designed for Canada? Numbers 1, 2, and 3 are American planes designed for the homebuilder. Hmm.
You bring up an interesting observation about the nationality and design focus of the aircraft in the list. Indeed, many homebuilt aircraft, including the ones in the list, originate from the United States and cater to the homebuilder community. Design considerations often reflect the needs and preferences of the local aviation culture and regulations. Do you have any thoughts on how aircraft designed for specific regions (especially in North America) might differ in terms of features or suitability for certain missions?
This list is definitely not accurate and independent opinion of the poster. There are other inexpensive kit "bush planes" that should have made this list.
No STOL distances. Too little info to compare or even give a rating.
Thanks for highlighting the importance of STOL capabilities. Are there specific aircraft models or features you're particularly interested in regarding STOL performance?
Surely fly silently indeed..!
You really need to get your facts right before making a statement.
इंडिया इस वरी लूगर कंट्री
Still cheaper than a new hilux.
Who needs a Hilux when you can take your bush plane to the grocery store? Just imagine the parking space!
No thank you
701 is a 2 place bird, not 4…
You're absolutely right, the Zenith CH 701 is a two-seater aircraft known for its versatility and rugged design. Sorry for the oversight! Have you had the chance to fly or work with one of these?
@@AviationFederation Yes. I’ve flown in one and about to start building mine.
There’s no such thing as cheap and aircraft being used in the same sentence. That will get you kicked off social media for misinformation 😊
Beginner level powered hang glider? I'm guessing that's gotta be under $2K?