The champion select chat is full of toxicity. Especially in low elo like silver-plat. Players randomly starting to flame each other and shout out, that they will run the following game down are things that often happen in my games. So I really like those restrictions.
This will probably just be a harsh penalty to anyone trying to play reasonable lol in low elo. It happens so often that sb already flames during champion select, then picks yumi top or sth and announces that they are inting. And then you either dodge (and now get penalized even more) or suffer through 30 mins of intentional int and an eventual loss. Great system.
One point I want to make in reference to when you were talking about soft inting and griefing is that chances are, often times players that behave like that also ARE typing, and will now be more likely to be punished. I know its not solving the problem, but it's something.
Only problem with detecting soft inting is that some “soft int” could be just normal people can be people having bad games. If they get reprimanded for one bad game.. that’d be a good problem
@@MinteeMusic Usually there is a pattern with these people, they dont just do this one game. If you are playing ranked and games are going horribly you should stop and not do that for like 5 games straight. There should be some timeout system in place. Also diamond and above players making mistakes and throwing games ways not even bronzes would should not be acceptable, these players know better and are clearly soft inting...
Its very concerning the way the league comunity behaves. I myself can be very oppinionated however like other decent humanbeings no matter what is written in the chat i realise its just words and i keep playing to win. This is something CS players used to do phenomenally back when i played CS, people would blatantly flame eachother beyond anything ive ever seen in league. Lo and behold everyone still tried their best, if you won most people sorta just verbally hugged it out at the end. There was still the human decency to respect the other players time and try. Now league however is a completely different story, the lack of selfrespect and respect for others is insane. It is absolutely criminal to watch sometimes. I think i speak on behalf of most adults playing this game, when i say adults i mean the people that understand that words are words and these people are random people online, the language doesnt really matter to us. When i say adults i mean the people that understand that words are words and these people are random people online. We sit down and decide to spend our time off on trying to have a competitive experience and it gets destroyed by quite frankly weak morals, poor parenting and, for a lack of better words and the fear of sounding like a samurai lost in time, no honor. I think/hope im not the only one feeling this way about it, either way sorry for the book :P Also english is not my first language and no i did not proof read it
Problem is Riot thinks the chat is more detrimental to the enjoyment of the game than people running it down. And thats the problem with their entire staff and management so it wont be ever fixed.
You say there is not so much toxicity in the chat but try playing a support with a hero typically chosen by women + a unisex ingame name than you'll see. I have never in my life been called so many ugly things before even the game starts and minions spawn. I have never been hated on more in my entire human life than in LoL by people who think I might be a girl. I love these restrictions and am 100% agreeing with Riot. Might even give the game another go.
@@DogeButcher Your statement is correct but that has nothing to do with my point. As soon as something goes not as planned as someone wants, high or low elo, lets say jungler gets invaded and is super behind or mid goes 0:2 this people start flaming and crying for the rest of the game. That just leads to other people flaming back, so them not beeing able to spam ff in chat or for real can change atleast a bit. Its for sure still not enought to stop the toxicity but atleast in step in the right way.
I think it would be better to just make a surrender only work if it's in unanimous agreement. Everyone signed up to play, people shouldn't be able to pussy out just because it went bad for them, it ruins the game for everyone else.
@@attilamarics3374 I really don't like the term of holding people hostage. *signs up to play game, subsequently cries because you have to play game that you signed up for*
Wanting soft inters to get banned is the most useless thing you can wish for, its legit doing stuff you cant get banned for cus its stuff people could do accidentally. Like you fatfinger a flash or ult and now you gotta get punished? Or like you care enough about that cannon minion you flash for it, plenty of people who take that trade willingly without inting. People deserve to have freedom in the game and you cant force people to play the way you want them to, so you cant ban people for soft inting. Unlike texts that are a simple algorythm ban, gameplay has to be analysed to know if the person is actually inting or not. Like even now there are a ton of people who get unfairly banned for inting just cus they had a bad game, question is how far do you want to move the "inting" line.
The champion select chat is full of toxicity. Especially in low elo like silver-plat. Players randomly starting to flame each other and shout out, that they will run the following game down are things that often happen in my games.
So I really like those restrictions.
Riots don´t ban smurfs, but continue to say, that they are working on it....
Yeah yeah, better produce more skins for lux
This will probably just be a harsh penalty to anyone trying to play reasonable lol in low elo. It happens so often that sb already flames during champion select, then picks yumi top or sth and announces that they are inting. And then you either dodge (and now get penalized even more) or suffer through 30 mins of intentional int and an eventual loss.
Great system.
One point I want to make in reference to when you were talking about soft inting and griefing is that chances are, often times players that behave like that also ARE typing, and will now be more likely to be punished. I know its not solving the problem, but it's something.
Nah. Thats a stupid take. Mediocre mind you have..
@@rv3427 Good thing you explained why it was stupid broski so anyone can understand what the hell you mean
GIVE US VOICE CHAT. LET US FLAME WITH OUR VOICE SO THAT WAY WE DONT HAVE TO WRITE AND STAY AFK FFS
These changes are useless, until people who run down and soft int start getting banned, the game's issues will never get better.
Only problem with detecting soft inting is that some “soft int” could be just normal people can be people having bad games. If they get reprimanded for one bad game.. that’d be a good problem
@@MinteeMusic Usually there is a pattern with these people, they dont just do this one game. If you are playing ranked and games are going horribly you should stop and not do that for like 5 games straight. There should be some timeout system in place. Also diamond and above players making mistakes and throwing games ways not even bronzes would should not be acceptable, these players know better and are clearly soft inting...
Its not enough but one step at a time.
Its very concerning the way the league comunity behaves. I myself can be very oppinionated however like other decent humanbeings no matter what is written in the chat i realise its just words and i keep playing to win. This is something CS players used to do phenomenally back when i played CS, people would blatantly flame eachother beyond anything ive ever seen in league. Lo and behold everyone still tried their best, if you won most people sorta just verbally hugged it out at the end. There was still the human decency to respect the other players time and try.
Now league however is a completely different story, the lack of selfrespect and respect for others is insane. It is absolutely criminal to watch sometimes.
I think i speak on behalf of most adults playing this game, when i say adults i mean the people that understand that words are words and these people are random people online, the language doesnt really matter to us. When i say adults i mean the people that understand that words are words and these people are random people online. We sit down and decide to spend our time off on trying to have a competitive experience and it gets destroyed by quite frankly weak morals, poor parenting and, for a lack of better words and the fear of sounding like a samurai lost in time, no honor.
I think/hope im not the only one feeling this way about it, either way sorry for the book :P Also english is not my first language and no i did not proof read it
Problem is Riot thinks the chat is more detrimental to the enjoyment of the game than people running it down. And thats the problem with their entire staff and management so it wont be ever fixed.
I mean, I went like 20 deaths per game if my team is bad so these changes don't really do anything. People do this so banning chat doesn't do much
There's no problem removing champion select chat. Play offrole dude, it's literally a mechanic in the game.
cancer update its over for this game
You say there is not so much toxicity in the chat but try playing a support with a hero typically chosen by women + a unisex ingame name than you'll see. I have never in my life been called so many ugly things before even the game starts and minions spawn. I have never been hated on more in my entire human life than in LoL by people who think I might be a girl. I love these restrictions and am 100% agreeing with Riot. Might even give the game another go.
I would had loved if they would had added that player below honor lvl 3 cant press ff but overall an good start but by far not enought.
This is irrelevant, player level (as in skill level, knowledge etc.) and toxicity has literally no correlation 😂
@@DogeButcher Your statement is correct but that has nothing to do with my point. As soon as something goes not as planned as someone wants, high or low elo, lets say jungler gets invaded and is super behind or mid goes 0:2 this people start flaming and crying for the rest of the game. That just leads to other people flaming back, so them not beeing able to spam ff in chat or for real can change atleast a bit. Its for sure still not enought to stop the toxicity but atleast in step in the right way.
I think it would be better to just make a surrender only work if it's in unanimous agreement. Everyone signed up to play, people shouldn't be able to pussy out just because it went bad for them, it ruins the game for everyone else.
@@zev4133 I dont know. Most of the games people are just running it down. So it work both ways. You cant just hold others hostage.
@@attilamarics3374 I really don't like the term of holding people hostage.
*signs up to play game, subsequently cries because you have to play game that you signed up for*
Wanting soft inters to get banned is the most useless thing you can wish for, its legit doing stuff you cant get banned for cus its stuff people could do accidentally. Like you fatfinger a flash or ult and now you gotta get punished? Or like you care enough about that cannon minion you flash for it, plenty of people who take that trade willingly without inting. People deserve to have freedom in the game and you cant force people to play the way you want them to, so you cant ban people for soft inting. Unlike texts that are a simple algorythm ban, gameplay has to be analysed to know if the person is actually inting or not. Like even now there are a ton of people who get unfairly banned for inting just cus they had a bad game, question is how far do you want to move the "inting" line.
wow extra pings sounds op