Based on the Chicago Outlaws who originated in McCook, IL then moved to Chicago. They did ride a lot out into the country - suburban, Wisconsin and then later around the midwest and more. I think Comer did a great job with the accent.
Very nice review, Kyle. I appreciate yours. Your perspective and attention to detail shows your level of familiarity with the subject matter, your research and your life in the geographical area and with these types of "characters." Thanks very much. I'm subscribed.
11:12 I was very VERY impressed when I saw that the set designer or whomever got that pre-safety glass moment correct. Bennie punches the drivers side window of that pickup and it broke up into sheet glass. Which, pre-code, would really do lethal damage in an accident.
@@KyleCorwithPLEASE : Hello, why does Kathy want Benny to stop the motorcycle and the vandals Please, why does she want Benny to stop the motorcycle and the vandals Because we see 2 people in the bar without taking Benny for his jacket Why did they attack him and beat him up How did he end up in hospital And why Kathy said Benny is uncontrollable but uncontrollable on what Benny he them And how he did to join the Vandals Benny because in the trailer we see Kathy being attacked by bikers wearing Vandals jackets And why are they attacking Kathy and Benny the Vandals Chicago guys because we see Kathy say to Johnny it's mine you'll never have it what did they mean when she said it's mine you'll never have it So what would happen if Benny left the Vandals Club and got out of his Gang What would the other members of the Club and Johnny do to him if Benny left them all Thank you for your answers
Maybe. I just would’ve liked to have seen an effort, even if they did a digital composite to include, say the Chi-town skyline, at least, for a movie that is directly set in that place. I mean, their jackets sport “Chicago” on their emblem patches! 😄
Agreed, the texture of film is far more cinematic to look at and instantly makes you remember why movies used to be these special events to get hyped about. The quality difference was really noticeable to me a few years back when suddenly watching A Quiet Place 2 and No Time to Die in close succession after watching so many endless, bland, digital movies that came out since it became the main shooting format around 2013 / 2014. So it definitely makes me appreciate how Jeff Nichols, Nolan, Shyamalan, Guadagnino, PTA and Eggers are making the effort to continue shooting with it. I totally get that digital can help save on budget and number of shoot days required (and for some studios is mandatory like with Netflix for example) but digital just has such a forgettable, throwaway look that makes you feel indifferent about whether you can make time for a movie or not. Then you have those people claiming that you can only notice the difference if you see it projected on film which is complete BS because if you watch any scene from any movie ever shot on 16mm or 35mm here on youtube (even 'The Bikeriders' or 'Challengers' from this year) or any camera test from some youtuber using these formats to make a comparison video, it's such a stark contrast with film obviously having that more classic / cinematic visual appeal, even if I still like some movies that were shot digitally (Hell or High Water, Arrival, Copshop, Green Book, Dragged Across Concrete) thanks to all the other filmmaking elements just working so well to help you look past it.
Purists might say that we won’t get the “true” exhibition of celluloid if it is not projected on film, but I agree with you. You certainly CAN see those differences on a digital projection. Well stated!
It should have been an awesome, high-quality miniseries. I honestly didn't get enough of the characters. I would have loved to hang out with them more
Interesting. The only downside to that is we wouldn't have been able to experience it in the theaters.
I really love this movie
@@jacobdenton6065 It’s one of the better films this year so far.
Based on the Chicago Outlaws who originated in McCook, IL then moved to Chicago. They did ride a lot out into the country - suburban, Wisconsin and then later around the midwest and more. I think Comer did a great job with the accent.
This needs to get 10's of thousands of views... great, comprehensive review!
@@OffTheCover Thank you, man! ✊
Very nice review, Kyle. I appreciate yours. Your perspective and attention to detail shows your level of familiarity with the subject matter, your research and your life in the geographical area and with these types of "characters." Thanks very much. I'm subscribed.
Wow, I really appreciate that!
11:12 I was very VERY impressed when I saw that the set designer or whomever got that pre-safety glass moment correct. Bennie punches the drivers side window of that pickup and it broke up into sheet glass. Which, pre-code, would really do lethal damage in an accident.
Oh, good eye you got there!
@@KyleCorwithPLEASE :
Hello, why does Kathy want Benny to stop the motorcycle and the vandals Please, why does she want Benny to stop the motorcycle and the vandals
Because we see 2 people in the bar without taking Benny for his jacket Why did they attack him and beat him up How did he end up in hospital
And why Kathy said Benny is uncontrollable but uncontrollable on what Benny he them And how he did to join the Vandals Benny
because in the trailer we see Kathy being attacked by bikers wearing Vandals jackets And why are they attacking Kathy and Benny the Vandals Chicago guys
because we see Kathy say to Johnny
it's mine you'll never have it what did they mean when she said it's mine you'll never have it
So what would happen if Benny left the Vandals Club and got out of his Gang What would the other members of the Club and Johnny do to him if Benny left them all
Thank you for your answers
They didn't have the budget for all extra family stuff.
$40 million looks to be sufficient to accomplish those snippets.
Maybe they shot in a different area because of the regulations about riding without the helmets? Idk
Maybe. I just would’ve liked to have seen an effort, even if they did a digital composite to include, say the Chi-town skyline, at least, for a movie that is directly set in that place. I mean, their jackets sport “Chicago” on their emblem patches! 😄
VANDALS CHICAGO FOREVER
Had to dislike the video cause I couldn’t agree with this guy’s review. I thought the movie was absolutely great. Another modern classic
I also liked it very much....
Agreed, the texture of film is far more cinematic to look at and instantly makes you remember why movies used to be these special events to get hyped about. The quality difference was really noticeable to me a few years back when suddenly watching A Quiet Place 2 and No Time to Die in close succession after watching so many endless, bland, digital movies that came out since it became the main shooting format around 2013 / 2014. So it definitely makes me appreciate how Jeff Nichols, Nolan, Shyamalan, Guadagnino, PTA and Eggers are making the effort to continue shooting with it. I totally get that digital can help save on budget and number of shoot days required (and for some studios is mandatory like with Netflix for example) but digital just has such a forgettable, throwaway look that makes you feel indifferent about whether you can make time for a movie or not. Then you have those people claiming that you can only notice the difference if you see it projected on film which is complete BS because if you watch any scene from any movie ever shot on 16mm or 35mm here on youtube (even 'The Bikeriders' or 'Challengers' from this year) or any camera test from some youtuber using these formats to make a comparison video, it's such a stark contrast with film obviously having that more classic / cinematic visual appeal, even if I still like some movies that were shot digitally (Hell or High Water, Arrival, Copshop, Green Book, Dragged Across Concrete) thanks to all the other filmmaking elements just working so well to help you look past it.
Purists might say that we won’t get the “true” exhibition of celluloid if it is not projected on film, but I agree with you. You certainly CAN see those differences on a digital projection. Well stated!