Why don't more people watch these videos! You need a million subs and views, these videos are very helpful. Please never stop making these great videos Andras!
Outstanding series. The psychology angle is very different to what others cover, and spot on for my needs. Well done for finding such a great niche and exploiting it so well. I particularly like the video recording of a coaching session.
I also had a game in this structure and it featured one idea i was really proud of: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 Nc6 6.Bg5 e6 7.Qd2 Be7 8.0-0-0 0-0 9.h4 Nxd4 10.Qxd4 e5 11.Qd2 Be6 12.Kb1 Qc7 13.f3 Rac8 14.Bb5! (the best move intending Ba4-Bb3, I eventually got total control of d5 with Bxf6 and won by pushing the kingside pawns)
Excellent video, I was waiting for this one. Thanks again for the lesson, it's nice to see all these examples. If I can summarize: "it's always better to recapture with a piece, except when it's not." 😄
Great video! You mentioned that it may have been cluttered with all the examples but I really appreciate seeing all the varied examples - it helped drive the concept home a lot better! Please make more videos like this (with lots of example positions :)
You have permanently impressed me with occupying the weak square with the piece. As a senior learner... that is an accomplishment. I did purchase one of your Chessable courses.
i just recently discovered your channel and i want to thank you for all this lessons, it's amazing how you share all this concepts making them easy to understand, you deserve billion views!
Thank you for this. Your videos and courses convinced me to play the Sicilian as Black and these types of videos sure help me to better understand how to play it. You could do a whole playlist (or course!) on common strategic and tactical motifs in the Sicilian. Topics that come to mind are: White sacrifices on e6 and/or d5 (which you've touched on in previous videos), the importance of controlling e5 for Black, the complimentary nature of e4-e5 by White with ...b5-b4 for Black (one is often the correct response to the other. Soltis explains this in his "100 Chess Master Trade Secrets", and why Black adopts various move orders (...a7-a6 to control b5 and prepare ...b7-b5, Black not allowing White to play Nd4-f5 early in the opening, etc.) I'd also love to see something on the evolution of the Sicilian Defense and also a video that goes into a bit of depth in differences in strategic thinking behind the various Black systems (i.e., what is Black aiming for in the Kan vs. the Taimanov and the Taimanov vs. Classical, the Classical vs. the Najdorf, the Kalishnikov vs. the Shveshnikov, etc., etc.)
I have been reading the “Najdorf I” and “Najdorf II” sections of Chess Structures by Flores Rios that also has many examples of fighting for d5 and when to take with the pawn or not and what to do afterwards
I also immediately recalled the Chess Structures book. I recall that taking with the piece is usually correct, unless circumstances allow you to take with the pawn and quickly initiate a queenside pawn rush with c4, b4, c5, etc. I believe Rios shows Geller's famous win against Fischer with the pawn recapture.
This is another exceptional video. I'm about 1750 lichess after a long time off (used to be more like 1875) and I have quite limited Sicilian theory, so I'm often playing the position without much theory. The weak square on d5 in the Sicilian is one of my main reasons why i have a good record against these Sicilian variations. It's actually a funny thing from my lack of theoretical understanding, I'm very averse to occupying d5 with a pawn, so most of my losses have come by trying to avoid recapture with the pawn to the point where it hurt my position. But ive definitely won a lot more games due to being adverse to recapturing on d5 with a pawn than I've lost. But the whole point here that exploiting a weak square is a heuristic that you never lose, but from time to time gets outweighed by concrete considerations is super valuable.
I just had a horrible game in the Italian Ulvestad variation. Got to play the weird bf1 move that you showed in a video. Thanks. Ill upload it pretty soon.
wow glad you tackled that! i just saw the twitter thread and just everything in my body is cringing from that guy’s reasoning and i never would be able to keep it cool and answer in a fashion like you did so well in this video. hats off for keeping it cool and being understanding because i certainly can’t hahahaha. great video also, keep it up!
Would be nice to have a speed run under an anonymous acct. Great content for one but number two you could do some clean up for the site having cheating problems. Potentially work along with them knowingly as that is the objective. Double whammy. Could potentially get paid for such thing since its work for the site. Might be some idea to proposition them with.
In a recent interview Caruanna said he did this and found it to be as high as 1 in 4 in the 1800 range. I believe he is being modest and would find its much higher. We must protect the integrity of chess. Our pillars in the community sort if have an obligation to do such things.
In the English example, isn’t the square your knight eventually lands upon a weakness as well and thus the principle isn’t completely overruled by the tactics?
The choices for positional pawn captures, waits, and pushes are a big barrier for chess learning for sure. The most difficult I find are pairs of pawns facing each other. I've gone through long periods narrowing down to two choices and choosing the mistake over and over so it's not a topic that will grow stale for sure.
"I did some engine analysis and the computer says that it's usually right to take back with the pawn in the sicillian." Yeah... I don't think what you did was actually analysis if your conclusion is "the engine usually likes to take with the pawn." If you can't give an explanation better than that for why the position is better then your engine analysis isn't going to help you in any actual game because you're either going to apply that principle incorrectly or you're going to get the position but not be able to make use of the advantage. Engine analysis is hard.
nah its fine in that specific position. will often lead to good results. in a more complicated case any recapture will have pros and cons even masters won't always get right. but truely understand the benefits of a "recapture" will improve you as a player in general and not just of a specific type of position. but it's far more difficult and takes more time to truely understand a position + an engine will not really help you if you lack understanding in general, aka weaker player. they need a coach.
many people play more or less the same lines so a Bc4 player in the Najdorf will rarely end up in an English attack position where exd5 is the correct move (easy to understand when you see that you attack the flank (kingside) and not the center)
Dr Can is the only RUclips Channel that is even more undereated than yours.. absolutely brilliant vids with 2000-4000 Views each.. Breaks my heart
I never heard of the guy but I will surely check him out now!
Its not very often that I consistently get views in that range...
@@ChessCoachAndras let's call it equally underated then 😄✌️ giving my best, to give both of you some Klicks
Why don't more people watch these videos! You need a million subs and views, these videos are very helpful. Please never stop making these great videos Andras!
Outstanding series. The psychology angle is very different to what others cover, and spot on for my needs. Well done for finding such a great niche and exploiting it so well. I particularly like the video recording of a coaching session.
I also had a game in this structure and it featured one idea i was really proud of: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 Nc6 6.Bg5 e6 7.Qd2 Be7 8.0-0-0 0-0 9.h4 Nxd4 10.Qxd4 e5 11.Qd2 Be6 12.Kb1 Qc7 13.f3 Rac8 14.Bb5! (the best move intending Ba4-Bb3, I eventually got total control of d5 with Bxf6 and won by pushing the kingside pawns)
Excellent video, I was waiting for this one. Thanks again for the lesson, it's nice to see all these examples. If I can summarize: "it's always better to recapture with a piece, except when it's not." 😄
Thanks a lot Maurits for the kind donation! And yes, you summarised it perfectly! 😂
Great video! You mentioned that it may have been cluttered with all the examples but I really appreciate seeing all the varied examples - it helped drive the concept home a lot better! Please make more videos like this (with lots of example positions :)
You have permanently impressed me with occupying the weak square with the piece. As a senior learner... that is an accomplishment. I did purchase one of your Chessable courses.
i just recently discovered your channel and i want to thank you for all this lessons, it's amazing how you share all this concepts making them easy to understand, you deserve billion views!
@@Fischer-random thanks a lot and welcome onboard!
Thank you for this. Your videos and courses convinced me to play the Sicilian as Black and these types of videos sure help me to better understand how to play it. You could do a whole playlist (or course!) on common strategic and tactical motifs in the Sicilian. Topics that come to mind are: White sacrifices on e6 and/or d5 (which you've touched on in previous videos), the importance of controlling e5 for Black, the complimentary nature of e4-e5 by White with ...b5-b4 for Black (one is often the correct response to the other. Soltis explains this in his "100 Chess Master Trade Secrets", and why Black adopts various move orders (...a7-a6 to control b5 and prepare ...b7-b5, Black not allowing White to play Nd4-f5 early in the opening, etc.) I'd also love to see something on the evolution of the Sicilian Defense and also a video that goes into a bit of depth in differences in strategic thinking behind the various Black systems (i.e., what is Black aiming for in the Kan vs. the Taimanov and the Taimanov vs. Classical, the Classical vs. the Najdorf, the Kalishnikov vs. the Shveshnikov, etc., etc.)
Thanks for another excellent video! 👏
Very well said, Andras 🧐
I have been reading the “Najdorf I” and “Najdorf II” sections of Chess Structures by Flores Rios that also has many examples of fighting for d5 and when to take with the pawn or not and what to do afterwards
I also immediately recalled the Chess Structures book. I recall that taking with the piece is usually correct, unless circumstances allow you to take with the pawn and quickly initiate a queenside pawn rush with c4, b4, c5, etc. I believe Rios shows Geller's famous win against Fischer with the pawn recapture.
This is another exceptional video.
I'm about 1750 lichess after a long time off (used to be more like 1875) and I have quite limited Sicilian theory, so I'm often playing the position without much theory. The weak square on d5 in the Sicilian is one of my main reasons why i have a good record against these Sicilian variations.
It's actually a funny thing from my lack of theoretical understanding, I'm very averse to occupying d5 with a pawn, so most of my losses have come by trying to avoid recapture with the pawn to the point where it hurt my position. But ive definitely won a lot more games due to being adverse to recapturing on d5 with a pawn than I've lost.
But the whole point here that exploiting a weak square is a heuristic that you never lose, but from time to time gets outweighed by concrete considerations is super valuable.
Glad you liked it. The Sicilian is a tough beast to tame without theory but indeed, good understanding can take you far!
One of the best explanations of when/why e5 is bad in najdorf. Appreciate the vid coach
I selfishly would love a smilar video in benoni structures when black plays e6xd5 when it is good to play cd and when to play ed
So interesting to see the Main Plans in the openings. This lesson really helps understand why certain moves Are played in the opening. Thanks!
The conclusion here is the same as the answer to every question in law school: "it depends."
I just had a horrible game in the Italian Ulvestad variation. Got to play the weird bf1 move that you showed in a video. Thanks. Ill upload it pretty soon.
wow glad you tackled that! i just saw the twitter thread and just everything in my body is cringing from that guy’s reasoning and i never would be able to keep it cool and answer in a fashion like you did so well in this video. hats off for keeping it cool and being understanding because i certainly can’t hahahaha. great video also, keep it up!
Awesome explanation, as always
Great video Andras! Amazed at the speed of new videos coming out. You rock!
Funnily enough, today I've studied the next variation which contains the right capture on d5.
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Qc7 4. O-O a6 5. Bxc6 Qxc6 6. Nc3 e6 7. d4 cxd4 8. Nxd4 Qc7 9. Re1 d6 10. Bf4 e5 11. Nd5 Qd8 12. Be3 Nf6 13. Ne2 Nxd5 14. Qxd5!! (Not 14.exd5)
🤣
Very instructive, as always!
Great video. I really like these positional idea videos.
"Why is white better here?"
Me *with confidence*: Because white is ready to cast-
Andras: Because d5 square is weak
Me: 😢
Thanks!
Thanks a lot for your generosity!
Triple AAA quality chess videos.
I love ths channel but its 12 am and I need to go back to sleep :(
Would be nice to have a speed run under an anonymous acct. Great content for one but number two you could do some clean up for the site having cheating problems. Potentially work along with them knowingly as that is the objective. Double whammy. Could potentially get paid for such thing since its work for the site. Might be some idea to proposition them with.
In a recent interview Caruanna said he did this and found it to be as high as 1 in 4 in the 1800 range. I believe he is being modest and would find its much higher. We must protect the integrity of chess. Our pillars in the community sort if have an obligation to do such things.
Brilliant
you the man
In the English example, isn’t the square your knight eventually lands upon a weakness as well and thus the principle isn’t completely overruled by the tactics?
The choices for positional pawn captures, waits, and pushes are a big barrier for chess learning for sure.
The most difficult I find are pairs of pawns facing each other.
I've gone through long periods narrowing down to two choices and choosing the mistake over and over so it's not a topic that will grow stale for sure.
man, exd5 hurts my eyes, please take it off the board.
"I did some engine analysis and the computer says that it's usually right to take back with the pawn in the sicillian." Yeah... I don't think what you did was actually analysis if your conclusion is "the engine usually likes to take with the pawn." If you can't give an explanation better than that for why the position is better then your engine analysis isn't going to help you in any actual game because you're either going to apply that principle incorrectly or you're going to get the position but not be able to make use of the advantage.
Engine analysis is hard.
nah its fine in that specific position. will often lead to good results. in a more complicated case any recapture will have pros and cons even masters won't always get right. but truely understand the benefits of a "recapture" will improve you as a player in general and not just of a specific type of position. but it's far more difficult and takes more time to truely understand a position + an engine will not really help you if you lack understanding in general, aka weaker player. they need a coach.
many people play more or less the same lines so a Bc4 player in the Najdorf will rarely end up in an English attack position where exd5 is the correct move (easy to understand when you see that you attack the flank (kingside) and not the center)