You can't really complain about sharp edges and choking hazards. Because this was the time that lawn darts were the favorite outside toy. Lionel thought that if they made a train inexpensive it would lure new buyers in. Back then the economy was terrible and people didn't have money for expensive toys. When I was a kid I would have loved to have one of those sets because it would have been better than nothing. I grew up during that time and I never got a train set as a kid because they were too expensive even though I asked Santa for one every year. I didn't get my first set until I got my first job and bought it myself. So it was wonderful for those who didn't have a choice.
I found one of these at a flea market many years ago. It was dirt cheap, so i bought it for around the tree for Christmas, i didn't have a lot of money at the time. My daughter loved it. It still works, i may repaint everything more Christmasy at some point.
The crazy thing is, Lionel was planning to make a remote-controlled, battery-powered version with plastic track in 1979, but it never got made. Maybe that was the original goal with these cheaper sets.
I remember encountering this train in the basement of some party. I remember holding the Illinois Central crane car, and thinking "Lionel made this?" I also remember seeing the blue dump car and Santa Fe caboose. It felt like those cheap battery train sets more than anything.
Well no kidding! Last December one of my fellow club members gave me one of these, and probably just to get it out of the house! The engine was a bit different though, it had metal wheels and the reverser switch was in the cab. The motor mount was broken, an easy fix with some epoxy, and like yours the smokebox cover was loose so I glued that in as well. There were some regular Lionel freight cars in the bag, plus track, and a little conventional transformer. I got the thing running again and sold the package at a local show for $30 and the folks were glad to have it (I made sure they knew exactly what they were getting) as a cheap starter set, and you know what? I sold the set Saturday and they came back Sunday for more track and cars! So the moral of the story is even a cheap sleazy starter set can get folks started on the path. Where they go afterward is up to them. Some how I doubt this cheap set's going to be as far as they go.
Personally I think the perfect example of a Lionel O gauge starter engine would be The Lionel Columbia Type 2-4-2-Locomotive No. 1001. It was made in 1948, and I found one for my grandpa a few years ago to give to him as a gift as he was born that same year. The engine still runs despite its age, and while it’s the first of Lionel’s engines to have a plastic body, it still shows that Lionel has been making some pretty great trains for a good long time. This engine that you’re showing is an example of when they really drop the ball.
This train in this video looks like those le cheapo Grocery store battery trains, Marx on the other hand has cheap affordable trains that were better that Lionel scout with smoke light Direction and Reliable, marx 4 wheels cars definitely look better
After rewatching the video I heard there is gonna be a worthless trains part 4 And I really hope there's going to be it's actually a really cool series
I have the "upgraded" 8300 engine made using the same tooling from the engine. It's pretty weak, but it has more metal parts. According to the seller they glued the boiler plate in because it kept coming off.
On the 8300 Santa Fe if I were you I would take off one of the rear wheels that are on the back of the motor and install a #600-8040-125 rear undercut wheel from a junker motor and put it on your 8300 steamer. I did that on my 8300 and 8500 steamers and they can pull 6 MPC 6464 type boxcars and an MPC SP style caboose with no problem. You also could order that wheel from a parts dealer who carries that part. I hope that this will help you.
The DC sets were kind of a mistake in my opinion for Lionel. They were trying to compete with Marx and it was a dark time for both companies. I’ve always thought the control was pretty neat but it is super unreliable. I’ll also agree the 442 is not really worth anything but they’re a PERFECT starter for someone getting into the hobby. They’re smooth runners and don’t look bad either.
If this was your first ever set you'd probably love it and you would be off on a journey that would see you buying better and more quality stuff. However if you have already owned quality trains to look at this you would think that it's cheap and nasty. If it were my first train set I would be thrilled and would probably be looking for the same set on ebay as an adult to relive my childhood memories with it. For some people this is how they started in the hobby. As for me we were so poor I had a piece of wood tied to a roller skate and I called it the Flying Scotsman.
Cool video , still fun . Back then toy companies didn’t care about us choking.😂 I have sold a lot of Lionel stuff. I will agree with you, low quality. Good information. I once sold the pink train set missing a few parts for 80.00 , o big mistake. New subscriber to you today. Mike Espo .
I can understand your opinion on this set, as it is pretty cheaply made, but I'm not sure if I totally agree. To me, this set is something that a parent bought for a little kid, to keep them occupied. Cheap, easy to assemble and some action. A youngster could watch this go around for a while, maybe push the button to dump the log car. A kid that is eight or ten years old, would probably never even look at it, but a three or four year old would probably be fascinated by it. I have the precursor to that 2-4-2 you show, the Lionel 246, built when Lionel was still based in New York. It was basically a starter locomotive, back then. I don't run it on my layout, but it looks good in the engine house. An excellent video.
I remember seeing the ads for this set on tv. Someone on my street had one. Though crude, they were for a price point that electric trains are no longer appearing in and were fit for their intended purpose. They made similar sets into the 80s so for me this is what I think of as a Lionel starter set.
To me, it just looks like an upscaled Trix Twin drive, I’d recommend having a look at those, rather valuable and good to collect, a massive contrast to this
The number on the caboose probably belongs on the locomotive. I have the better version of this grade of set as my first Lionel, the 1976 Rock Island Line set. The loco in that set had an AC motor albeit with manual reverse. The rest of the set was a PC gondola, UP flatcar (some variants substituted an 027 boxcar) and a Rock Island bobber caboose. The only other time a starter set used this locomotive was the Black Cave Flyer (1982?) and that version had a DC motor, with the rest of the set comprising a gondola, '027' boxcar and SP-type caboose. All of then employed user-applied stickers and all were _very_ lightweight. I have a video with a train of cars from almost every modern O-gauge company, that carried the Black Cave set loco/tender on a pair of flatcars and the set cars tagging along on their own wheels within the train (with entirely too many heavier cars behind them). When the 8601 Rock Island or 8212 Black Cave locomotives are found used, the most common defect is a broken siderod yoke -- the piece attached to the front of the motor that carries the free ends of the siderods. (after that would be a missing boiler front and the other trim pieces on the shell). I was able to source replacements for the yoke (part number 600-8601-070) after an extensive search and make 'runners' of my Black Cave and a second Rock Island loco, but chances are that anyone else looking to resurrect examples of the RI or BCF locos will have to conjure up a 3D clone of this part, in function if not exact appearance. There is also one other DC powered low-end set that's slightly above the WotRR, but not what you'd call quality either -- the Kickapoo Valley set, with a Docksider-ish 0-4-0 switcher, with a shorty 2-axle gondola, dump car and bobber caboose.
It's set up on the table, a child is seated in each corner and the train is run at full speed. When it flys off the track, the kid hit is "out". On to round two.
This was my first set ever...from Santa no less! Still have all the components from the set. Pretty sure my Dad added a rectifier so the engine would run on normal Lionel AC transformer.
I’ve never seen the biggest model train manufacturer with the lowest quality train set. I bet they did way better back in those days too. That is just awful. Great vid.
Thanks so much for watching! I agree completely, they had some amazing products in the late 70s - almost feels like this was made by a totally different company and just had the Lionel name attached.
yes it looks cheap and it was made during the 1970s, a period of slow economy after the oil embargo, Lionel really had problems during this period, just like the real railroad world. But it was produced in America and it still works great, i think that is impressive. how many of todays model trains will still work after 50 ! years and they sure cost a lot more... Well nice video, as always, thanks !
I was going to ask if it was possibly made in Japan or Hong Kong. Around that time, to keep costs down, companies would out-shop work like this to have one or more low cost items for discount store-only sales. Thank you for mentioning it was American made.
I got that set for Christmas when I was about 7 years old! I still remember my dad complaining about the 'trucks' and how cheap it was compared to the Lionel trains he had as a kid. Lol. Despite the fact that even my 7-year-old self knew that it sucked, I still liked it and enjoyed playing with it...until the motor burned up when I tried pulling a Lionel Republic Steel gondola with a rock in it with the poor little "Engine #9"! I never fessed up about the rock in the gondola, so my parents wrote Lionel (or sent in the warranty card or something), and I got another cheap plastic engine to replace it! Great memories!
It was good that Lionel honored the warranty and got your train running again! Did your dad lose interest when he got to be a teenager and decided to sell his train?
That is pretty bad, but I’ll raise you the cheap mini battery trains they make. (Not the ready-to-play ones, the tiny things that they have at Disneyland and stuff)
This looks to me as an effort to bring the target market age down. If I have a 4-8 year old who wants a train, and I’m budget conscious, I may give this a try. Goodness! When my grandson was 5 and under his trains were Thomas trains on Brio wooden track. The features weee all exactly where they belonged: in his imagination.
I have two 4 4 2 trains just like the one in this video one is a new York Central 8632 formally known by me as the Pennsylvania Gambler and a Santa fe 8632
Is the packaging original? Just a heap of multiple parts in a box? Starter sets in Europe are much different. As well there are the costs a limiting factor, but the parts are at least sorted in some sort of styrofoam keeping them apart and protecting them against shocks and tosses. Even the sets in the 1950s had a box subdivided for rolling stock and track material. There might be some simplified rolling stock designed for smaller kids, but most starter sets bring normal track material and the rolling stock gives an example of the quality of the manufacture. When I bought my starter set as an adult in 2002 its goods waggons impressed me. I would not offer starter sets without at least two turnouts and decouplers. Starter sets are a must to get into the hobby in Europe, to buy the items separately could be easily twice as expensive.
When you think about how cheap this thing looks and feels, I'm surprised they didn't power this by AA batteries as it would've made more sense to get kids from a younger demographic into trains. I've had a few O Gauge sized battery sets in my life, and this doesn't even hold a candle to them.
If anyone has that crane car, I could use it for parts. I need a boom and the top piece on the crane cab to replace the one for my Redwood Valley Express crane car.
Id buy it. So I can give it to my next door neighbour who is into trains and like to crash them because since they are worth like nothing so if it breaks I don’t care.
Hi Washington District Railfan & it's is Randy and i like yours video is Cool & Thanks Washington District Railfan & Friends Randy & Grade Lionel's Trains ( F-) & MY Is Ho Scale Grade (100% )
@@richardsmith4403 The problem with this set is it wasn’t inexpensive to buy when it was produced- the price is and was comparable to much better sets being produced by other brands. If this item was a $10 set, I wouldn’t be making this video
You can't really complain about sharp edges and choking hazards. Because this was the time that lawn darts were the favorite outside toy. Lionel thought that if they made a train inexpensive it would lure new buyers in. Back then the economy was terrible and people didn't have money for expensive toys. When I was a kid I would have loved to have one of those sets because it would have been better than nothing. I grew up during that time and I never got a train set as a kid because they were too expensive even though I asked Santa for one every year. I didn't get my first set until I got my first job and bought it myself. So it was wonderful for those who didn't have a choice.
Ok this is actually true
I found one of these at a flea market many years ago. It was dirt cheap, so i bought it for around the tree for Christmas, i didn't have a lot of money at the time. My daughter loved it. It still works, i may repaint everything more Christmasy at some point.
The crazy thing is, Lionel was planning to make a remote-controlled, battery-powered version with plastic track in 1979, but it never got made. Maybe that was the original goal with these cheaper sets.
It might not be super great, but the log dumper/loader would be cool to see in some more modern starter sets
I agree! Modern starter sets could use more operating accessories and play features.
A sealed example of this outfit is a cool collectable
The log loader would later be sold as a kit by Lionel.
This makes Tyco’s worst late 80’s offerings look amazing by comparison.
I agree!
Tyco was actually good for their time.
You're right really. They were easily my favorite of the big manufacturers when I was a kid. I _should_ be bagging on Life-Like.
I remember encountering this train in the basement of some party. I remember holding the Illinois Central crane car, and thinking "Lionel made this?" I also remember seeing the blue dump car and Santa Fe caboose. It felt like those cheap battery train sets more than anything.
Well no kidding! Last December one of my fellow club members gave me one of these, and probably just to get it out of the house! The engine was a bit different though, it had metal wheels and the reverser switch was in the cab. The motor mount was broken, an easy fix with some epoxy, and like yours the smokebox cover was loose so I glued that in as well. There were some regular Lionel freight cars in the bag, plus track, and a little conventional transformer.
I got the thing running again and sold the package at a local show for $30 and the folks were glad to have it (I made sure they knew exactly what they were getting) as a cheap starter set, and you know what? I sold the set Saturday and they came back Sunday for more track and cars!
So the moral of the story is even a cheap sleazy starter set can get folks started on the path. Where they go afterward is up to them. Some how I doubt this cheap set's going to be as far as they go.
Personally I think the perfect example of a Lionel O gauge starter engine would be The Lionel Columbia Type 2-4-2-Locomotive No. 1001. It was made in 1948, and I found one for my grandpa a few years ago to give to him as a gift as he was born that same year. The engine still runs despite its age, and while it’s the first of Lionel’s engines to have a plastic body, it still shows that Lionel has been making some pretty great trains for a good long time. This engine that you’re showing is an example of when they really drop the ball.
Its like Lionel tried to copy Marx in a bad way, Marx trains were like this but with printing and good quality train that were cheap
I agree completely - Marx has more going for them in my opinion - they somehow pull off the single wheel cars and simple steam engines.
This train in this video looks like those le cheapo Grocery store battery trains, Marx on the other hand has cheap affordable trains that were better that Lionel scout with smoke light Direction and Reliable, marx 4 wheels cars definitely look better
Maybe put together what you feel is a good starter set and see what it sells for?
After rewatching the video I heard there is gonna be a worthless trains part 4 And I really hope there's going to be it's actually a really cool series
I have the "upgraded" 8300 engine made using the same tooling from the engine. It's pretty weak, but it has more metal parts. According to the seller they glued the boiler plate in because it kept coming off.
On the 8300 Santa Fe if I were you I would take off one of the rear wheels that are on the back of the motor and install a #600-8040-125 rear undercut wheel from a junker motor and put it on your 8300 steamer. I did that on my 8300 and 8500 steamers and they can pull 6 MPC 6464 type boxcars and an MPC SP style caboose with no problem. You also could order that wheel from a parts dealer who carries that part. I hope that this will help you.
The DC sets were kind of a mistake in my opinion for Lionel. They were trying to compete with Marx and it was a dark time for both companies. I’ve always thought the control was pretty neat but it is super unreliable. I’ll also agree the 442 is not really worth anything but they’re a PERFECT starter for someone getting into the hobby. They’re smooth runners and don’t look bad either.
You are so right, Me Pappy got me one yesterday and I said I`d prefer a slurpy at Dairy Queen. At that he replied, "SON", but I forget the rest.
If this was your first ever set you'd probably love it and you would be off on a journey that would see you buying better and more quality stuff. However if you have already owned quality trains to look at this you would think that it's cheap and nasty. If it were my first train set I would be thrilled and would probably be looking for the same set on ebay as an adult to relive my childhood memories with it. For some people this is how they started in the hobby. As for me we were so poor I had a piece of wood tied to a roller skate and I called it the Flying Scotsman.
Cool video , still fun .
Back then toy companies didn’t care about us choking.😂
I have sold a lot of Lionel stuff.
I will agree with you, low quality.
Good information.
I once sold the pink train set missing a few parts for 80.00 , o big mistake.
New subscriber to you today.
Mike Espo .
I can understand your opinion on this set, as it is pretty cheaply made, but I'm not sure if I totally agree. To me, this set is something that a parent bought for a little kid, to keep them occupied. Cheap, easy to assemble and some action. A youngster could watch this go around for a while, maybe push the button to dump the log car. A kid that is eight or ten years old, would probably never even look at it, but a three or four year old would probably be fascinated by it. I have the precursor to that 2-4-2 you show, the Lionel 246, built when Lionel was still based in New York. It was basically a starter locomotive, back then. I don't run it on my layout, but it looks good in the engine house. An excellent video.
I remember seeing the ads for this set on tv. Someone on my street had one. Though crude, they were for a price point that electric trains are no longer appearing in and were fit for their intended purpose. They made similar sets into the 80s so for me this is what I think of as a Lionel starter set.
I'm guessing they had a hard time adjusting for the inflation of the late '70s.
You mean inflation during the Carter years?
To me, it just looks like an upscaled Trix Twin drive, I’d recommend having a look at those, rather valuable and good to collect, a massive contrast to this
And many collectors think the scout sets from the 50s are junk, they did't see this one
The number on the caboose probably belongs on the locomotive. I have the better version of this grade of set as my first Lionel, the 1976 Rock Island Line set. The loco in that set had an AC motor albeit with manual reverse. The rest of the set was a PC gondola, UP flatcar (some variants substituted an 027 boxcar) and a Rock Island bobber caboose.
The only other time a starter set used this locomotive was the Black Cave Flyer (1982?) and that version had a DC motor, with the rest of the set comprising a gondola, '027' boxcar and SP-type caboose. All of then employed user-applied stickers and all were _very_ lightweight. I have a video with a train of cars from almost every modern O-gauge company, that carried the Black Cave set loco/tender on a pair of flatcars and the set cars tagging along on their own wheels within the train (with entirely too many heavier cars behind them).
When the 8601 Rock Island or 8212 Black Cave locomotives are found used, the most common defect is a broken siderod yoke -- the piece attached to the front of the motor that carries the free ends of the siderods. (after that would be a missing boiler front and the other trim pieces on the shell). I was able to source replacements for the yoke (part number 600-8601-070) after an extensive search and make 'runners' of my Black Cave and a second Rock Island loco, but chances are that anyone else looking to resurrect examples of the RI or BCF locos will have to conjure up a 3D clone of this part, in function if not exact appearance.
There is also one other DC powered low-end set that's slightly above the WotRR, but not what you'd call quality either -- the Kickapoo Valley set, with a Docksider-ish 0-4-0 switcher, with a shorty 2-axle gondola, dump car and bobber caboose.
It’s a super cheap looking set. I would hope this sold for less than a typical Lionel starter set.
It's set up on the table, a child is seated in each corner and the train is run at full speed. When it flys off the track, the kid hit is "out". On to round two.
The economy sure was bad during the Carter years.
Jesus h Christ I’ve tried looking for footage of this damn set that isn’t in an old commercial *_EVERYWHERE_*
Props for you to suffering in this
This was my first set ever...from Santa no less! Still have all the components from the set. Pretty sure my Dad added a rectifier so the engine would run on normal Lionel AC transformer.
I’ve never seen the biggest model train manufacturer with the lowest quality train set. I bet they did way better back in those days too. That is just awful. Great vid.
Thanks so much for watching! I agree completely, they had some amazing products in the late 70s - almost feels like this was made by a totally different company and just had the Lionel name attached.
yes it looks cheap and it was made during the 1970s, a period of slow economy after the oil embargo, Lionel really had problems during this period, just like the real railroad world. But it was produced in America and it still works great, i think that is impressive. how many of todays model trains will still work after 50 ! years and they sure cost a lot more... Well nice video, as always, thanks !
I was going to ask if it was possibly made in Japan or Hong Kong. Around that time, to keep costs down, companies would out-shop work like this to have one or more low cost items for discount store-only sales. Thank you for mentioning it was American made.
I got that set for Christmas when I was about 7 years old! I still remember my dad complaining about the 'trucks' and how cheap it was compared to the Lionel trains he had as a kid. Lol. Despite the fact that even my 7-year-old self knew that it sucked, I still liked it and enjoyed playing with it...until the motor burned up when I tried pulling a Lionel Republic Steel gondola with a rock in it with the poor little "Engine #9"! I never fessed up about the rock in the gondola, so my parents wrote Lionel (or sent in the warranty card or something), and I got another cheap plastic engine to replace it! Great memories!
It was good that Lionel honored the warranty and got your train running again! Did your dad lose interest when he got to be a teenager and decided to sell his train?
Garbage to you but I’ll take it cause it’s actually kinda cool
Do they make the 4-4-2 in lionchief WITHOUT the johm deer
I bought a locomotive that looks just like that out of curiosity and for laughs.
Perfect weathering project.
That is pretty bad, but I’ll raise you the cheap mini battery trains they make.
(Not the ready-to-play ones, the tiny things that they have at Disneyland and stuff)
I’d like to see them reproduce this, but make it better
The play features are absolutely there, they just dropped the ball on this one - the concept could work great though!
@@WashingtonDistrictRailfan I don’t think it’s really bad. I just think it’s underwhelming.
C.o.M.E.G.e/ Conti style pickups
My 5 to 8yo self would like that set even just for the controller.
I do agree - the controller is very cool. I would love to see a higher quality version.
Dollars and cents-sales, profits, costs.
Question:do u have atleast one Thomas the tank engine item because if u do that’s
Cool
This looks to me as an effort to bring the target market age down. If I have a 4-8 year old who wants a train, and I’m budget conscious, I may give this a try. Goodness! When my grandson was 5 and under his trains were Thomas trains on Brio wooden track. The features weee all exactly where they belonged: in his imagination.
My grandpa jad this set at some point, i still have some random bits of the cars.
Other problem is that it barely has any color s
This was my first...was in a shead for 40+ years...just set it up and ran like brand new....so... don't think my tyco ho would've done that.
I have two 4 4 2 trains just like the one in this video one is a new York Central 8632 formally known by me as the Pennsylvania Gambler and a Santa fe 8632
Is the packaging original? Just a heap of multiple parts in a box? Starter sets in Europe are much different. As well there are the costs a limiting factor, but the parts are at least sorted in some sort of styrofoam keeping them apart and protecting them against shocks and tosses. Even the sets in the 1950s had a box subdivided for rolling stock and track material.
There might be some simplified rolling stock designed for smaller kids, but most starter sets bring normal track material and the rolling stock gives an example of the quality of the manufacture. When I bought my starter set as an adult in 2002 its goods waggons impressed me. I would not offer starter sets without at least two turnouts and decouplers. Starter sets are a must to get into the hobby in Europe, to buy the items separately could be easily twice as expensive.
Thanks!
I still have this set in my collection that I bought for my boys in December of 1978 for Christmas 🎄 it still runs for the most part
How much are you thinking of selling it for?
Not a whole lot, haha - less than $50.
@@WashingtonDistrictRailfan good to kniw
When you think about how cheap this thing looks and feels, I'm surprised they didn't power this by AA batteries as it would've made more sense to get kids from a younger demographic into trains. I've had a few O Gauge sized battery sets in my life, and this doesn't even hold a candle to them.
The penn central logo on the side of the tender just says crappy by even looking at it.
No worse than Marx using PC on a tender.
Box is worth more than contents.
Wow, I have never seen this set before. Yikes.
Its a doozy for sure!
If anyone has that crane car, I could use it for parts. I need a boom and the top piece on the crane cab to replace the one for my Redwood Valley Express crane car.
FunDimension.
You should compare this to your lionel Southern 2000 you got 8 months ago lol
Lionel should be embarrassed to put something like that out in even toy market
Looks like one of those cheap Chinese sets that pop up around Christmas.
It's like those really cheap sets you find in museums gift shops.
It doesn’t look that bad
The 8902 blows that turd out of the water.
I agree 💯
Terrible Express.
Body mounted trucks are soo Marx.
Id say their modern ho sets with weird track thats inferior to bachman's, and cars made with molds froms the 70s are one of their worst products.
Tube track is the essence of Lionel , Fastrack is too noisy and over priced. No doubt this set is junk though
Id buy it. So I can give it to my next door neighbour who is into trains and like to crash them because since they are worth like nothing so if it breaks I don’t care.
The quality is Atrocious?
Hi Washington District Railfan & it's is Randy and i like yours video is Cool & Thanks Washington District Railfan & Friends Randy & Grade Lionel's Trains ( F-) & MY Is Ho Scale Grade (100% )
I don’t even think that’s the worst
More $s for China.
That is low quality. It might be good for a 2 year old.
Look at some of the Marx sets. Some just sucked.
Yeah definitely not great.
You pick the cheapest set made and then you complain? You are missing a few beans in your salad.
@@richardsmith4403 The problem with this set is it wasn’t inexpensive to buy when it was produced- the price is and was comparable to much better sets being produced by other brands. If this item was a $10 set, I wouldn’t be making this video
Garbage set cheap cheap cheap
Dude. You're overstating the obvious. The MPC era had it's share of garbage. Do yourself a favor. Work on your content.
The MPC era had a lot of amazing products - this isn't a good representation of what Lionel is about, even in what many consider their worst era.
In 1978 lionel was moving some of the manufacturing to China and Mexico then in the 80s or 90s completely moved manufacturing over seas
I like tyco model trains very much most if my ho is tyco and life like ho trsins run great
Question:do u have atleast one Thomas the tank engine item because if u do that’s
Cool