Community engagement and participation amplify the effectiveness of climate initiatives, fostering a sense of shared responsibility and collaboration essential for navigating the complexities of climate change.
Another huge aspect to this issue is deforestation. Not only does it release massive amounts of carbon from the soil when trees are cut down, but there are less plants to fix the and therefore trap the carbon. If all the huge unesessary lawns were replaced by food forests, global warming would be significantly slowed, hunger issues irelivant, and industrail agriculture unecesaary.
Even if you do not believe in global warming (I do not know how it is possible in 2024...) we have to change radically to have a cleaner and greener planet earth.
I think these young kids have never noticed that summers are pretty hot & that we have had plenty of 90 degree days before. In places like AZ/NM/Palm Springs, this is there biome so 100 is normal.
@gregheffley-kq3bo you do know that when Mt. SAINT Hellens erupted in 1980 she pumped 1,000 times as much CO2 into the atmosphere as industrial man has since we started. You do know that man's biggest carbon contribution is from 8 billion people each exhaling 2 KG per day!
@gregheffley-kq3bo how much CO2 do you think it took for the volcano in Indonesia to blast that cloud of ash the size of North America 8,000 feetbinto the air?
@ricktd6891 what a disappointment. You claim to be scientific yet you dismiss solid counter arguments, personal observations, and facts as "lies". This is why you are not successful winning people to your way of thinking
Climate alarmists always play the "denier" card when challenged.They can't comprehend that unique planet earth revolves around the sun tilted at an angle of 23.5 degrees to the vertical.This ultimately determines global climates from EQUATOR to the POLES ( seasons etc ).DON'T kid yourself you will change this MUCH.
@@lancer0327 wheres yours to say there is? Their scientists that they own? Or the ones that get silenced. They been saying it for the last 60 years, we going to flood, we going to burn because of ozone, we going into an ice age on and on to charge us climate tax. Why dont you look at patents for weather manipulation. Its there just google it
As the climate heads into greater extremes globally, how can we best deal with future climate crises? The short answer is that we cannot deal with them unless we take care of nature's inner balance. We live in a tightly-closed and interdependent system in which everything boomerangs back to us. While living in such a system, we need to reconsider what we want and think, and how we treat each other, because our human connections are the primary influence on how nature responds to us. It is common to think that climate is dependent on factors outside of us-whether it be balances between heat and cold in the environment, or the effects of various kinds of pollution we emit-because we lack a complete picture of how our attitudes to each other bring about the strongest responses from nature toward us. No creature distorts nature the way that we people do. And it is not simply a matter of switching to renewable energy sources, electric cars and the like; it is a matter of how we relate to each other. If we truly wish to witness more balance throughout nature and not have to deal with all kinds of cold waves and other natural disasters, then similarly to how we have electricity, water and gas meters in our homes, we should also have meters that count how much evil we emit into the world from our negative attitudes to each other. What I mean is that if we could feel the extent to which we emit negative forces into the world, which negatively ricochet back to us, then we would wish to change this negative driver within us. We would want to switch it to a drive that makes our human connections positive, and which harmonizes us with nature. In simple terms, when we get up in the morning, we should first and foremost consider what we need to do in order for all people to have it good. Developing such an attitude is not so simple, yet we will need to seriously work on it as we head into the future. A life of increasing blows from nature or a life of peace and harmony depends on the extent to which we impact a shift in our attitudes to each other-from negative to positive.
Earth's greenhouse effect would be in heavy saturation if the strong greenhouse gas water vapor were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Noncondensing greenhouse gas behavior such as from carbon dioxide and methane do not warm the planet because they can not cause earth's greenhouse effect to retain anymore temperature. Greenhouse gas behavior is only active in earth's greenhouse effect that takes place within 20 meters of the surface. After that all the inferred electromagnetic radiation from the surface is considered to have been entirely absorbed by its weak interaction with the lumpy electrostatic fields of greenhouse gases. Its further heat transfer is by convection i.e. gas molecules bumping into each. The UN IPCC science reports when less than 200 pages only discuss greenhouse gases as a cause for global warming and very clearly state they they sampled their greenhouse gases at 20 thousands meters altitude far into stratosphere were water vapor is near zero. Global warming suddenly paused in the early 1990s at 1.1°C then dipped and recovered to be in 2022 1.1°C. There has been no notable change in these end-to-end global warming temperatures in thirty years..
Do you actually think you're more qualified to make insights on climate change than the thousands of scientists worldwide who constantly refine their theories and models through data collection and peer review? What are your sources for this?
@@SewayPL Totally, because what those "experts" are stating is based outside earth's greenhouse effect typically at 20,000 meters. See the truth is in the fine print. The UN IPCC only takes gas reading at 20,000 meters altitude according to their science reports. That have to state that, because all their analysis when pushed in a court room setting can be place back to that. It's well known science that all the inferred electromagnetic radiation for the earth's surface that is the energy of the greenhouse effect is considered completely absorbed within 20 meters of the surface. There is no energy left to further interact with greenhouse gasses. That was taught in my high school! Any science interested high school student should known that. The glaring aspect is global warming hasn't really changed much in the past thirty years prior to 2023! Global warming was reported 1.1°C in 1991. In 1994 it was announced global warming had paused in 1991. On average in 2023 CO2 has a 1/4% share of earth's greenhouse effect! With a 99 1/2% share of the greenhouse effect being on average is from water vapor. The greenhouse effect is in heavy saturation from water vapor without any other greenhouse gases. If you want to support scammers just keep on going the way you are without ever reading the UN IPCC science reports. I have. Al Gore's carbon dioxide warming the planet fraud has made life impossible for many scientists and some engineers. The legal back stop is they are clear and transparent they only took their gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude and not within 20 meters of the surface where earth's greenhouse effect takes place.
@ricktd6891 co2 absorbs and reradiates heat. It absolutely leads to a greenhouse effect which warms the planet. You're making a non-scientific statement without any sources
Why do we still have central means of electricity production? When the solution is already available. Solar panels + Solar Battery (I have this already and in summer my electricity use is 100% solar powered) on every house, building, warehouse, school, rooftop etc. All new cars are Electric cars immediately, the ones with or without solar panel rooftops (already available). Just bring it in, never mind the inconvenience - all new cars must be electric by 2023. All new small trucks must be something like a rivian or tesla cybertruck or equivalent. All new heavy trucks must be hydrogen or electric trucks. That would be a huge help
EV trucks and hydrogen powered trucks wouldn't be able to carry much freight!There would be increased danger of truck fires / explosion. Hydrogen as a power source?How is ZIGGY FORREST and his green hydrogen plans going?
@lloydsingline340 the tesla semi truck is more powerful and faster than a diesel truck, including when fully laden. I don't know about hydrogen, how powerful they are etc, but they already have them in California. Electric trucks are MORE powerful, much cheaper to run, faster, simpler to drive and safer than a diesel truck. I'm not affiliated with anyone. 100% renewable or hydrogen powered future IS possible, but it depends whether people are willing to look into it. By the way Pepsi cola bought a large fleet of electric trucks.
Who’s watching this for school? ✋
Me
Me ✋
It's all les and fear mongering.
@@otoogladys5096 You should sue your school for communist indoctrination.
@@mahendrabadgujar5038 You should also sue your school.
This is what keeps us safe from almost any threat you can come up with: Economic growth, wealth creation and inexpensive reliable energy.
Community engagement and participation amplify the effectiveness of climate initiatives, fostering a sense of shared responsibility and collaboration essential for navigating the complexities of climate change.
CO2 = greenwashing
Anyone for COP 29
Another huge aspect to this issue is deforestation. Not only does it release massive amounts of carbon from the soil when trees are cut down, but there are less plants to fix the and therefore trap the carbon. If all the huge unesessary lawns were replaced by food forests, global warming would be significantly slowed, hunger issues irelivant, and industrail agriculture unecesaary.
I Believe In Mother Nature We need to Save Nature .
Alarmist propaganda, devoid of science, 'n facts,....
Hey we love this video over at Planet Cents, Inc.! I hope it's okay that I repost it onto our channel :)
Amazing video! ❤
I'm here starting my studies for the Olympics!
Tysm I understood rn you have good skills keep it up!
素敵なビデオと説明! これはおそらく私が今まで見た気候変動に関する最高のビデオです!
Lo mismo digo
私はピニスリカです
Even if you do not believe in global warming (I do not know how it is possible in 2024...) we have to change radically to have a cleaner and greener planet earth.
Lo enseñare en el cole😁😁
ruclips.net/video/RQRqr9_jw5I/видео.html
I think these young kids have never noticed that summers are pretty hot & that we have had plenty of 90 degree days before. In places like AZ/NM/Palm Springs, this is there biome so 100 is normal.
Man's CO2 contributions to our atmosphere are less than a fart in a hurricane.
@gregheffley-kq3bo you do know that when Mt. SAINT Hellens erupted in 1980 she pumped 1,000 times as much CO2 into the atmosphere as industrial man has since we started. You do know that man's biggest carbon contribution is from 8 billion people each exhaling 2 KG per day!
@gregheffley-kq3bo how much CO2 do you think it took for the volcano in Indonesia to blast that cloud of ash the size of North America 8,000 feetbinto the air?
@gregheffley-kq3bo that is CO2 driving that ash into the air!
ruclips.net/video/xzm-X-7n0jw/видео.htmlsi=K0ro-WaekQaobOoK
Yea guys
WOW....unbelievable the intelectual failures. IF the earth warmed about 5 degrees...where did the ice go?
Talented creators here!! Excellent #teamearthly
Thank you so much, Cami :)
All les and fear mongering.
@@ClimateScience You and the other alarmists are responsible for millions of animal and human deaths because of your global warming scam.
e
Cheer~~the weather conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period.😊
I have a comment but it is too long to post. Is there an email address?
It's all les.
@ricktd6891 what a disappointment. You claim to be scientific yet you dismiss solid counter arguments, personal observations, and facts as "lies". This is why you are not successful winning people to your way of thinking
@@marktwainboatrestoration-j1600 What sold arguments? What facts?
The weather now is horrendous, we need an ice age ASAP
What If we put giant catalyzators on factories and everything which produces CO2?
That is being done.
Sadly, not really efficient.
Something more important 😇
i cant be the only one watching this 1 day before my final science exam 💀💀💀💀
Tomorrow us the last day for the Olympiad. I'm prepping from the crash course.
Wow amazing thank you
I AM FROM LANDAN AMERICA
Amazing video!
I'm here for journalism practice on sci tech. This helps a lot!
when is the sea level meant to rise?
It has risen.
@@epicchocolate1866yeh by about 1-2mm per year
This is good, but I need one more dumbed down to share with Climate Change deniers. More... more....more dumbed down than that.
P.S. There's no such thing as a "climate change denier." You use that slur because you were told to. Pitiful.
You're the worst kind of idiot. The kind that says I'm sorry, while the boat sinks, as if that helped in some way. @@ricktd6891
😅😅😅 Bingo!!
Climate alarmists always play the "denier" card when challenged.They can't comprehend that unique planet earth revolves around the sun tilted at an angle of 23.5 degrees to the vertical.This ultimately determines global climates from EQUATOR to the POLES ( seasons etc ).DON'T kid yourself you will change this MUCH.
Wonderful video yet again!
Wouldn't you rather have the truth?
Liars
Proof?
@@lancer0327 wheres yours to say there is? Their scientists that they own? Or the ones that get silenced. They been saying it for the last 60 years, we going to flood, we going to burn because of ozone, we going into an ice age on and on to charge us climate tax. Why dont you look at patents for weather manipulation. Its there just google it
@@lancer0327 funny that my comment disappeared
They been saying the same for over 60 years, ice age, then all gona be underwater, then we all going to burn etc ect.
They own the science and the facts, they say this themselves. Whilst other scientists are silenced.
Sigan asi 🌟 quedo increible 👍
Love the animations!!
All lies and fear mongering.
amazing!! ✨
Les and fear mongering over a global scam.
Excelent work! excelente trabajo :D
A bunch of lies and fear mongering.
As the climate heads into greater extremes globally, how can we best deal with future climate crises?
The short answer is that we cannot deal with them unless we take care of nature's inner balance.
We live in a tightly-closed and interdependent system in which everything boomerangs back to us. While living in such a system, we need to reconsider what we want and think, and how we treat each other, because our human connections are the primary influence on how nature responds to us.
It is common to think that climate is dependent on factors outside of us-whether it be balances between heat and cold in the environment, or the effects of various kinds of pollution we emit-because we lack a complete picture of how our attitudes to each other bring about the strongest responses from nature toward us.
No creature distorts nature the way that we people do. And it is not simply a matter of switching to renewable energy sources, electric cars and the like; it is a matter of how we relate to each other.
If we truly wish to witness more balance throughout nature and not have to deal with all kinds of cold waves and other natural disasters, then similarly to how we have electricity, water and gas meters in our homes, we should also have meters that count how much evil we emit into the world from our negative attitudes to each other. What I mean is that if we could feel the extent to which we emit negative forces into the world, which negatively ricochet back to us, then we would wish to change this negative driver within us. We would want to switch it to a drive that makes our human connections positive, and which harmonizes us with nature.
In simple terms, when we get up in the morning, we should first and foremost consider what we need to do in order for all people to have it good. Developing such an attitude is not so simple, yet we will need to seriously work on it as we head into the future. A life of increasing blows from nature or a life of peace and harmony depends on the extent to which we impact a shift in our attitudes to each other-from negative to positive.
You write too much and know too little. Maybe you should catch up to the fact the hypothesis has been debunked several times already.
Unfortunately 99% of people won't understand this... 😥
Theburningearth
Check the facts. The Earth is historically cold right now.
There should be more CO2 in the atmosphere, not less. Get a clue.
there should be a balance
@@MahamRizwan-dx6ey Oh really? At what level is CO2 balanced? What's the perfect level of atmospheric CO2?
Sorry Greg. Did you remove your post because you realized you don't know what you're talking about?
@@Rick-yk5qbwhere did you get your credentials I’m curious, I’d love to hear about your research models?
Love it 😊
You love lies and propaganda?
Wow amazing thank you
Stop thanking traitors.
really wonderful
All lies.
@@ricktd6891all lust night lights*
Fake news
Earth's greenhouse effect would be in heavy saturation if the strong greenhouse gas water vapor were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Noncondensing greenhouse gas behavior such as from carbon dioxide and methane do not warm the planet because they can not cause earth's greenhouse effect to retain anymore temperature. Greenhouse gas behavior is only active in earth's greenhouse effect that takes place within 20 meters of the surface. After that all the inferred electromagnetic radiation from the surface is considered to have been entirely absorbed by its weak interaction with the lumpy electrostatic fields of greenhouse gases. Its further heat transfer is by convection i.e. gas molecules bumping into each. The UN IPCC science reports when less than 200 pages only discuss greenhouse gases as a cause for global warming and very clearly state they they sampled their greenhouse gases at 20 thousands meters altitude far into stratosphere were water vapor is near zero. Global warming suddenly paused in the early 1990s at 1.1°C then dipped and recovered to be in 2022 1.1°C. There has been no notable change in these end-to-end global warming temperatures in thirty years..
Do you actually think you're more qualified to make insights on climate change than the thousands of scientists worldwide who constantly refine their theories and models through data collection and peer review? What are your sources for this?
@@SewayPL Totally, because what those "experts" are stating is based outside earth's greenhouse effect typically at 20,000 meters. See the truth is in the fine print. The UN IPCC only takes gas reading at 20,000 meters altitude according to their science reports. That have to state that, because all their analysis when pushed in a court room setting can be place back to that.
It's well known science that all the inferred electromagnetic radiation for the earth's surface that is the energy of the greenhouse effect is considered completely absorbed within 20 meters of the surface. There is no energy left to further interact with greenhouse gasses. That was taught in my high school! Any science interested high school student should known that. The glaring aspect is global warming hasn't really changed much in the past thirty years prior to 2023! Global warming was reported 1.1°C in 1991. In 1994 it was announced global warming had paused in 1991.
On average in 2023 CO2 has a 1/4% share of earth's greenhouse effect! With a 99 1/2% share of the greenhouse effect being on average is from water vapor. The greenhouse effect is in heavy saturation from water vapor without any other greenhouse gases.
If you want to support scammers just keep on going the way you are without ever reading the UN IPCC science reports. I have.
Al Gore's carbon dioxide warming the planet fraud has made life impossible for many scientists and some engineers. The legal back stop is they are clear and transparent they only took their gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude and not within 20 meters of the surface where earth's greenhouse effect takes place.
I can save you some time. CO2 doesn't control the temperature of Earth. The hypothesis failed.
@@SewayPL Sorry but thousands of scientists don't think the world is coming to an end because of CO2. Stop believing government lies.
@ricktd6891 co2 absorbs and reradiates heat. It absolutely leads to a greenhouse effect which warms the planet. You're making a non-scientific statement without any sources
Why do we still have central means of electricity production? When the solution is already available. Solar panels + Solar Battery (I have this already and in summer my electricity use is 100% solar powered) on every house, building, warehouse, school, rooftop etc. All new cars are Electric cars immediately, the ones with or without solar panel rooftops (already available). Just bring it in, never mind the inconvenience - all new cars must be electric by 2023. All new small trucks must be something like a rivian or tesla cybertruck or equivalent. All new heavy trucks must be hydrogen or electric trucks. That would be a huge help
Stop pushing communism. Telling people what to do is communism. Get educated on the global warming scam.
Because the ultra rich greedy corporations want us dependant on them!!
EV trucks and hydrogen powered trucks wouldn't be able to carry much freight!There would be increased danger of truck fires / explosion. Hydrogen as a power source?How is ZIGGY FORREST and his green hydrogen plans going?
@lloydsingline340 the tesla semi truck is more powerful and faster than a diesel truck, including when fully laden. I don't know about hydrogen, how powerful they are etc, but they already have them in California. Electric trucks are MORE powerful, much cheaper to run, faster, simpler to drive and safer than a diesel truck. I'm not affiliated with anyone. 100% renewable or hydrogen powered future IS possible, but it depends whether people are willing to look into it. By the way Pepsi cola bought a large fleet of electric trucks.
Lies, lies and more lies.