Oh, you guys using the snatoms would be really nice for your future videos. It makes me want some the more I see how useful they can be, even though at first I was doubtful about buying them.
I don't agree that trans fat and hydrogenated fat are the same thing. The hydrogenation process can produce trans fat if incomplete, but the main goal is transform polyunsaturated fatty acids in saturated fats as you know. And trans fat occurs naturally in products derivative from ruminants. I guess it was an (over) simplification between the process and the chemical nomenclature, but can cause confusion. p.s.: I don't think Derek will agree with the bond energy explanation… hehehe I watched the "Logic Problems, Energy, and Lollipop" episode! :)
+PratoFundo I'm not qualified to respond to you adequately, but as you said, I've been taught that the bad fat was the Partly Hydrogenated one and not the Hydrogenated one. Though, I can't explain more.
+francis bélanger the partial hydrogenation produces trans fat. Artificial trans fat is unnatural compared to its ruminant brother and bc it is a fairly new addition to the human diet, the body doesn't really know how to break it down (my hypothesis based on readings and college classes dealing with food & nutrition/food & health/ food science). The chemical structure of TF is slightly diff from UFA. While UFA has a double bond on the cis side, TF's double bond is on the trans side, creating a different looking "kink". Because TF is fully hydrogenated, it remains stable, which is good for food developers long shelf life, stability, and temperature withstandability but not so good on your arteries. Just to show how much more detrimental trans fat is to your health, there was a health study from the Nurses Health study from 1980-1994, that showed for a 5% increase in energy consumed in the form of Saturated fat, there was a 17% increase of the risk of heart disease. For a 2% increase in trans fat, there was a 93% increase in risk. I'm sorry if I didn't really answer your question, but I just wanted to share what I learned.
+PratoFundo THANK YOU! Finally someone else that understands that the term "transfat" does more harm than good. Classifying all types of trans fats as being 100% identical and equal, is a VERY dumb thing to do. It promotes ignorance and people fighting for causes they misunderstand. I would rather eat natural bacon fat, than eat half as much fat in man made partially hydrogenated oil. Mis-directed people will say I am stupid because bacon has more "trans-fat" or they will say "what is partially-hydrogenated?". Humans have eaten animal fat since the beginning of man kind. Partially hydrogenated oil's, however, were invented in the 1900s! They are less than 100 years old! Obviously humans didn't not eat the first animal in the 1900'a. Also, the news people talk about "maybe ban trans fat" and the argument against it, is to list foods that use partially hydrogenated oil, but rather than targeting this new chemical, they casually call it "trans fat" instead. Therefore, instead of actually talking about banning JUST Partially Hydrogenated Oil, they fool everyone into thinking they are going to ban donuts, breakfast foods and junk food. I'm sorry, but those foods are not REQUIRED to be made with partially-hydrogenated oil, they can easily be made with palm kernel oil.
Jay H My guess: I know Hank has a degree in Biochemistry and he understand all the science stuff. But the simplification took place and became a little wonky. For most people won't be a problem, but… Palm kernel oil… well, yes, they could. But it has own issues. 1) Kernel oil still is a saturated fat and not that healthy. 2) The palm crops aren't very good for the planet as well. Native forests are being felled.
This was super educational, all I ever see in the media are people labelling these things as good or bad but you've actually identified precisely what they are and why they are/'nt good for you.
Man i fucking love you ! as an aspiring fitness guy i find everything you discussed about fat and where fat goes when we exercise , tremendously useful. Sci show , Hank, Michael and SciShow team , guys you represent what best humanity has to offer.Kudos.
We watched this in class and I was so confused because my teacher just said this guy is really at good explaining fat and I was like but it isn't just a guy, that's Hank
Man, I'm glad I subscribed to this channel. I love learning new things, but not through reading so this is perfect. And they upload videos frequently. Thank you, SciShow staff.
how could it help the brain, if brain can not use fats as energy source? Eating little carbs makes your liver to deplete its carbs depot, because we are not very good at producing glucose from fats as quickly as brain requires
A study done in Norway showed that the fat/carb ratio was not important in the long run in terms of weight and heart health, it was the quality of the food that you eat that made the difference. They also found a higher total fat intake had a protective effect on your heart. It's only one study, but I think it makes a good point. Worry less about what you're eating and worry more about the quality.
+Selina Cox Yup, since it doesn't really exist in nature, our bodies haven't evolved any clue what to do with it. (either positive uses, or protective measures) At least saturated fat has some uses, like helping with the absorption of certain vitamins, but trans fat is really just a harmful, synthetic additive with no real redeeming qualities. We were really better off just sticking with lard. It doesn't have a particularly healthy balance of fats, but at least your body recognizes everything in it. Short rule of thumb: -Unsaturated fats are like carbs and protein: just watch your calories, make sure you're eating a balance of the 3, and you're probably good. -Saturated fats have some benefits, but moderation is important. -Trans fats are terrible for you and don't do you any good.
+Selina Cox All partially hydrogenated Oil is a trans fat, but not all trans fat is a partially hydrogenated oil. Partially hydrogenated oil for a transfat, is more harmful than naturally occurring transfat.
+Jake Underhill I don't get why people explain that like it's some revelation. If we entirely cured cancer, that would only be a reduction of five percentage points. I guess that means we needn't bother!
Oh man, how awesome. I must have missed this episode last winter. Since my wife and I are making handcrafted soaps (and because I'm just a big nerd) I have been researching different types of fats, their qualities in soap and how they differ molecularly. This video is a wealth of knowledge. And I think I must have snatoms now!!!!
3:24 Sci show, You are referencing the Lipid hypothesis, which has been revoked by numerous studies as being untrue. Saturated fats have no link to plaque build up or heart disease. In fact, the latest research has shown the top three causes of heart disease are high blood sugar, stress and smoking. All of these are things that happen to raise your cholesterol, which has supposedly been linked to saturated fats. Again this is untrue. There is a grain of truth though: plaque can build up in your arteries, but it is not made up of sat-fats, it is made of dense LDLs, which are made from refined carbohydrates. Dense LDL builds up in the arteries and that causes inflammation. Saturated fats do not cause heart disease; the study that made that claim was flawed and is no longer accepted by the scientific community. As for cholesterol, high cholesterol does not cause heart disease, otherwise Dwight D Eisenhower would not have had a heart attack with a cholesterol level of 165.
+frankydman This is correct though, It's not exactly true that LDL is made up of processed carbohydrates. The primary factor in manufacturing LDL is regularly over filling liver glycogen stores. When liver glycogen levels are full, remaining fructose gets manufactured into long chain triglycerides and because triglycerides are the limiting factor in the production of dense LDL, more LDL is produced. The primary source of fructose in the modern western diet is in processed carbohydrates. That's where the connection is. Of course glucose can also fill lever glycogen stores, but it's more likely to be used to fill skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue stores(depending on which are more insulin sensitive). The main point is that you ant to eat carbohydrates appropriate for your insulin sensitivity and activity levels and only consume fructose when your goal is to restore liver glycogen levels after a fasting period(sleep) or after intense exercise to avoid ketogenisis. Fat should be your final consideration after factoring in your minimum protein consumption in order to reach your calorie goals. Eating healthy fats like omega-3 from fish oil(DHA in particular) is a way to improve insulin sensitivity further and saturated fat overall is not dangerous when you're not overeating.
+frankydman The majority of the scientific establishment, as well as major health authorities such as the American Heart Association, still recommend limiting the consumption of saturated fats based on a wide acceptance that they contribute to heart disease, based on decades of research. There is plenty of controversy, but you are misleading people by talking about the matter as though it is done with and widely accepted as false when it clearly isn't. What's more - this sentence: "high cholesterol does not cause heart disease, otherwise Dwight D Eisenhower would not have had a heart attack with a cholesterol level of 165" - is a logical fallacy because it presumes that in order for high cholesterol to be ONE cause of heart disease it must be THE ONLY possible cause of heart disease. This is like saying that smoking cannot cause lung cancer because some non-smoker who worked in the radon factory died of lung cancer.
I'm not misleading anything or anyone. I only state facts, and If you look back through the history, and the studies done, there is nothing that supports the lipid hypothesis. The lipid hypothesis suggest two things essentially: eating saturated fats raises cholesterol, high cholesterol causes heart disease. Neither of these are true, because the study that put it forward was flawed. In the 1950s, biochemist Ancel Keys proposed the lipid hypothesis based on a "six country study" that included Italy, Japan, US, UK, Australia, and Canada. There seemed to be an obvious trendline, where Japan and Italy had low rates of heart disease and low sat fat consumption. and US with high fat intake, high hear disease. One problem, the "six country study" was in fact a TWENTY-TWO country study, and the results were all over the place. For example, Holland and Norway had high rates of Fat consumption, but little heart disease. Chile had low fat consumption, but a high rate of heart disease. But Keys wanted to make an impact, so he cherry picked his data and presented it as accurate. As for the "decades of research" by what do you refer? No study has ever shown a link between saturated fats and heart disease, while over 30 studies have shown that just the opposite is true. For example- Michael DeBakey, a world-renown cardiac surgeon, once did research into this hypothesis involving more than 1600 patients... and he found no correlation between cholesterol and heart disease. And my statement is not a logical fallacy; that is just the point; how can high cholesterol cause heart disease when clearly, Eisenhower had a heart attack with a cholesterol level of 165? There must be something else, and that something else, as shown by recent research, is inflammation of heart tissue due to a build up of dense LDL.
frankydman I'm not saying I disagree with you, but the position of most medical authorities does, right down to the American Heart Association. But as for the logical fallacy part - yes, I stand by what I said: that is a logical fallacy. If you're unfamiliar with it, I suggest looking up "necessity and sufficiency."
+frankydman I agree on what you say about the lipid hypothesis and get annoyed with talking about unsaturated and saturated fats as healthy and unhealthy, respectively, but Sedrin is right, your comment about Eisenhower is incorrect and this is a classical logical fallacy. Yes, there must be something else, but that doesn't mean that high cholesterol isn't *a* cause of heart attacks. Only if we knew that heart attacks only have one single cause (which we don't, obviously), then we could conclude that cholesterol can't be that cause, because we have encountered a counter example (assuming no measurement error). Here's a different example: The ground gets wet when it rains, but it also gets wet when someone washes their car. Now when the ground is wet, but it hasn't rained, I can't conclude that raining doesn't cause wetness of the ground. More generally, from A -> B (read: from A follows B) you can't conclude !A -> !B (from not A follows not B), which is the fallacy. You can only conclude !B -> !A (from not B follows not A), in this case meaning that a patient that doesn't have a heart attack can't have high cholesterol - and that doesn't make much sense here either, as you will agree, because all of these things are risk factors rather than logical necessities that can be tested this way. Sedrin, you're right, the authorities haven't changed their recommendations. A while back I saw an interview with the German food administration office on exactly this topic (blaing saturated fats and promoting high carb dietary regimes) and they said that they are obviously aware of these issues, but also of the very shaky current nature of food sciences and that they don't want to change their recommendations and confuse people until they are certain that they have to, which they don't think they do, still claiming that at least you won't get harmed from the "balanced" diet they are recommending. I don't agree with that attitude or their specific recommendations (I personally tend towards thinking of carbs as bad and saturated fats as good, for what it's worth), but then again I can basically take any position that I want on this and find evidence that supports it, because food sciences is just such a shitty field, largely built around correlational evidence, small sample sizes, short term experiments and terrible statistics.
Out of my several hours of reading various articles, some studies, opinions about the good and the bad, recommendations by organizations like the AHA, and other research, I had a decent idea how this all worked, but your video would have made things so much easier, lol. This pretty much sums it all up, even if there are a few details missing.
I watch most of the SciShow videos, and the ones with matarial I've already studied in university I tend to enjoy the most. Because science is made better when explained better, which is why I love watching SciShow.
One of the best (clear & informative) quick summations/explanations on these topics I've ever seen. Guess that's why I'm happy to be a contributor (even if only a small one) to this channel on Patreon!
There's no reason to think saturated fats are bad for you as the evidence suggests they have no ill health effects and indeed the body can handle them just fine. Saturated fat is good for cooking as it is relatively stable. Polyunsaturated fat is the worst for cooking and is unstable. Oils/fats high in polyunsaturated fats should be stored in a cool, dark place, and consumed quickly. It is also deemed a good idea to balance omega 3 and 6. So different fats need to be used and cared for appropriately.
+Matthew Mitchell I beg to differ. Tons of studies show that saturated fats have a very ill effect on cardiovascular health. Scishow agrees. Care to link to some studies suggesting otherwise?
+Adonis Not very good studies, the link between saturated fat and cardiovascular health is more tenuous than we thought. The one thing we know that is definitely true is that trans-fats are just awful and you should never consume them.
It's important to distinguish between dietary saturated fat and the saturated fat we "see" in our blood work. It's not intuitive but eating saturated fats won't increase that metric in your blood work. It's eating excessive carbohydrates that become transformed into saturated fat- that's the problem. This is the saturated fat that is observed in your blood work and is correlated with an increased likelihood of heart disease.
For people interested in the dietary and health side of science, there's Healthcare Triage with host Dr Aaron Carroll. Healthcare Triage is one of the Green brothers' educational projects so that's awesome! Also, I'm really happy that you're using Snatoms. Derek from Veritasium had a brilliant idea and he went for it, and it looks like he has succeeded.
+Justin Pond Because the view count increases the very second you click the video, whether or not you watch the entire thing has no bearing. Just FYI...not trolling or anything, lol.
I would love to see more dietary science! this helped me a lot with deciding what to buy. How about one on the effects of adding small amounts of fruit juice to your water (lemon water) ive heard its good for your kidneys but im not too sure...
+Oakley Wariner I doubt it has any significant effect directly (it's just heavily diluted fruit juice). That said, not getting enough water can be rough on your kidneys, so I expect it greatly helps people who don't get enough water normally by making it tastier so they do. It also probably reduces how often people reach for other beverages (many of which are full of stuff your kidneys then need to filter out of your blood). So, if you don't get enough water or want to drink less soft drinks, it's a great way to do that, but it's direct effect is probably insignificant (otherwise, lemonade considered extremely healthy for you).
+DynamicWorlds I drink water once per month or once per few months, you could say I'd die without fanta haha. Unhealthy I know, but it isn't a priority right now. Maybe later in life when I'm about to die or get fat.
+aidanbk Depends how long the sugars stick around in the mouth. Hell, from my understanding starches are more dangerous to teeth *because* they stick around longer.
Silly me didn't look at my subscriptions for a while and so didn't see this before my nutrition test. *sigh* Thanks Hank! This helps my understanding a ton.
+Christoph13131 Cis and trans have very defined meanings. And, in fact, those same meanings apply both to chemicals and to societal and biological designations we give things. Cis just means the same as. Trans means the opposite of. That's a bit of a simplification, but that's more or less how they work.
Good video, but as someone that had biology and is fairly interested in how what each kind of calorie does in your body and how it works. I haven't heard anything new in this video :(
+TheHadesShade ruclips.net/video/00jbG_cfGuQ/видео.html This video might be a good place to start in an understanding about how the body breaks down food into energy. I don't think the video is explicit about what the difference is between proteins, fats, and carbohydrates... but the short version is that each type of food is catabolized into molecules that can enter the cycle detailed in the video, along with some byproducts (like ammonia from protein). I hope that helps! -Sarah Meismer
+TheHadesShade Scishow is introductory, opening up complex subjects to the non-specialised among us. What you're looking for is far more in depth information, and will either require as little as a trip to the library, or as much as an enrolment at a university, depending on how deep you want to dive into it (:
I love butter and bacon and eat both daily. They have helped me gain and maintain a healthy weight and the doctor says I am perfectly healthy. Sedentary lifestyles will kill you faster than meat fat will.
It really depends on who. There has been cases of sporty and seemingly perfectly healthy people who died of a sudden attack. Exercising is important, no question about that, but a good dietary lifestyle might be even more important.
So I know this is going to come up because this is the internet so here it goes: Fats are not found only in animals. When Hank says "fat" he doesn't mean the chewy stuff on the edge of a steak. He means the chemicals that he describes, which are found in more than just meat. There are even pictures used as examples as to where the different fats can come from and it includes peanuts and olives. So before you militant vegetarians or vegans use this video as ammunition for your 'cause', I'd suggest watching the whole video and actually thinking about it first.
+William Bradey (Test) It's true, saturated fats are not always on animals and unsaturated fats are not always from vegetables. Fish and coconuts for instance. Further, lean meat has almost no fat in it. In fact, eating only lean meat will make you starve to death in a process called "rabbit starvation".
the one thing vegetarians don't seem to understand is that no matter how many "benefits" they throw out, people won't switch to vegetarian because nobody gives a Fuck. Lots of people just don't want to think about it 24/7.
Being vegan is an ethical choice. That's it. You can be healthy or unhealthy living either lifestyles. If you don't give a fuck about animals, that's your choice. I choose to give a fuck. 😊 #notamilitantkindofvegan
Reminds me of the bioorganic chemistry class in high school. Arguably the scariest class in the school. Just saying you took that class gave people chills.
It makes me so happy to see an endorsement of a thing just coz it's cool. You're like I have access to a medium of expression so here is a cool thing... love it.
Having just gone through a two month intensive chemistry course, this was a lot easier to quickly understand than it would without it! Great video, and lovely to put a lot of the knowledge into better perspective!
yup the atkins diet contains mostly saturated fat.Guess what?Dr Atkins ended up fat and died of a heart attack from eating his own diet.So yea saturated fats are good for you
+Jon Vaillancourt You conveniently left out the fact that he was 117 kilos with a history of heart attacks.( which could have been why he fell)And the fact that his wife refused an autopsy.Yea fact checking is so hard.If his diet was so good then whybwas he so fat before he died?
+StoreBrand That may actually be a result of where you live. You can definitely tell a difference if you live near where avocados are grown, like in CA, than if you live in an area that has to have them shipped over long distances.
Lol, the source for saturated fat is so weak and funny to read. Summary: "Um, like we think saturated fat might be a little bit bad for you, maybe?" I think I'll stick with my butter and/or coconut oil and eggs. Though I'm cutting back on processed bacon.
Show me the evidence of saturated fat building plaque in the arteries. Show me one study. One. No? Well, that's because fat don't randomly float around the blood stream suddenly getting stuck in the artery. Get your facts straight, please.
1,420,000 results scholar.google.fr/scholar?q=study+on+trans+fats&hl=fr&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjdsN77povOAhVHKMAKHQeIClUQgQMIGjAA I know you're gonna tell me it's trans, not saturated, but I want to make sure people aren't misled into thinking that the video is all wrong. I've read so much crap on the internet, like "safety belts are dangerous, therefore noone should wear them", that I am extremely suspicious about claims like yours. More often than not, those who make them have financial interests in confusing people, or they are simply trolls. As for saturated fat, I've read it may be linked with increase of cholesterol levels.
I basically eat sticks of butter in my diet over the last year. Results: my cholesterol is up, but only the HDL from 60mg/dL to 75mg/dL. All of the people I know with cholesterol problems 1) are obese and 2) eat lots of sugar.
Make one about carbs as well. When i quit eating them and increased my fat intake (by basically eating cheese and cream (no crazy processed stuff) i went from 100+ down to 80+ kg and i have a TON more energy and i feel really strong and healthy. Im not a slave under food anymore. I eat one to three times a day. It's very seldom im sick though i got a cold right now. But everybody is sick here now! Im a vegetarian since 15 years so i only eat this cheese and cream plus quorn and vegetables (mainly green and white ones). I want someone who isn't biased by tradition, culture or lobbyism to tell me this is bad, if it is. Different - yes. Bad - no ..? When i became a vegetarian (before it became a normal thing basically) people around me told it was the end for me .. im still alive and i have muscles (proteins wasn't an issue after all?). By the way, im not sure if it's because i have a dog and walk a lot, but i have a great condition now and can run fast and long with minor breathing. Before this i couldn't do either and with heavy breathing along with aching knees. You bet i become a bit defensive when someone speaks up against LCHF due to tradition, culture or lobbyism. I know how much it has helped me and i still see people suffering with unhealthy bodies and selfshaming when eating lots of carbs along with fat.
interesting, I have always viewed high fat diets as unhealthy. there are quite a few studies that show low carb diets being very unhealthy, mainly because your body requires carbs for its basic functions. I would argue that a higher carb diet is better, if in doubt eat more fruit even though they are high carb.
+hyperbolic fuckboi i haven't eaten a fruit in at least two years! The problem is that if you go above about 50g carbs the licht will not work. If you do that you'll gain a lot of weight fast. I've read you need about 25g carbs for your brain. I've never had to add any carbs to reach that limit and I've never felt that my brain didn't work because of eating too few. As I'm diagnosed both bipolar and Asperger I don't know if my brain acts differently though. I am very conscious about how efficient my brain is performing though and I can tell I've became me even more focused. Just as I started with lchf our head of "food and health" in our government came out and vaguely accused lchf for possibly being the reason behind an increase in strokes for males 30-40. No facts or studies to back that up at all. Maybe take a look at Starcraft and energy drinks.. This is what I m ant about tradition , culture and lobbyism. It's so corrupt. Sugars and carbs are such a huge deal business wise.
The idea that saturated fat is bad for you came from the assumption that eating saturated fat such animal fat caused high cholesterol, which has thoroughly been disproven. On the other hand, polyunsaturated fat might be good for you if manufacturers didn't mess with it chemically to give it a longer shelf life. Our knowledge of what foods and medicines are good for us is always tainted by the fact that research is done by someone trying to sell us something. "There are lies, damn lies and statistics" - Benjamin Disraeli.
+RebelWinterwolf It's more complicated than this, but the general rule of thumb is: Eat carbs is you're going to do something that'll make you breath hard I.E. sprinting, HIIT's, etc. And eat fats for everything else. You don't want to eat carbs if all you're doing is sitting down at the computer for hours. Keep this in mind and you'll be good.
completely wrong, sugar is the primary energy source and is more quickly metabolised. fat is more likely to be stored as body fat than carbs as carbs must be converted to fat. also fat is linked to more diseases than carbs hence why the ketogenic diet is an atrocious diet and why more high carbohydrate diet are linked with longer life span and better athletic performance.
well said balenced diet would be stack of potatoes herbs n spice side of tea hand full of nuts bowl of berries on a bed of greens and if you must have a carcuss throw a sliver for a condiment
what the fuck! Saturated fat does not clogs up your arteries. Read Good Calories, Bad Calories: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom on Diet, Weight Control, and Disease by Gary Taubes and you'll see why saturated fats are so healthy. Why We Get Fat: And What to Do About It. 2010. Gary Taubes
They're just popular books, not scientific studies. The vast majority of scientific studies point towards saturated fats being harmful at worst, and neutral at best.
Gary Taubes puts science and empirical evidence at the epitome of his research. You're pretty delusional if you think otherwise. The scientific consensus that you are referring to once proclaimed trans fat to be good for human consumption. The truth is, these scientific consensus was bought out by big companies paying them big money.
+Walter White lol I'm not trolling. Just look at Michael Gregor he has tons of videos on nuts. Plus nuts have fiber, antioxidants, and good fats like poly and mono which can lower cholesterol while fats from animals raise not only that it comes with worse stuff like animal protein, cholesterol, choline
+Jonathan Dittmar no it does not. saturated fat comes in many different lengths from a medium chain like lauric acid which the body may convert to monolaurin and has antimicrobial properties to a longer chain like stearic acid which is necessary for many metabolic processes essential to proper health. saturated fat is stable and improves your immune system, cardiovascular health, endocrine system and stabilizers blood sugar among many other things. but what it certainly doesn't do odds clog arteries and it definitely doesn't cause osteoporosis
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Now PLEASE do this for carbs and proteins :D
+pipnina sugar IS carbs
+pipnina the simplest form of carbs there is
+Mr93Suki YES!
+Mr93Suki Yes!
Good Idea :D
Regal290
That Guy
I stand corrected
all of these fat facts made my brain so stimulated that i probably lost about 0.5 extra calories today.
thanks sci-show for keeping us healthy!
Oh, you guys using the snatoms would be really nice for your future videos. It makes me want some the more I see how useful they can be, even though at first I was doubtful about buying them.
I don't agree that trans fat and hydrogenated fat are the same thing. The hydrogenation process can produce trans fat if incomplete, but the main goal is transform polyunsaturated fatty acids in saturated fats as you know. And trans fat occurs naturally in products derivative from ruminants.
I guess it was an (over) simplification between the process and the chemical nomenclature, but can cause confusion.
p.s.: I don't think Derek will agree with the bond energy explanation… hehehe I watched the "Logic Problems, Energy, and Lollipop" episode! :)
+PratoFundo I'm not qualified to respond to you adequately, but as you said, I've been taught that the bad fat was the Partly Hydrogenated one and not the Hydrogenated one. Though, I can't explain more.
+francis bélanger the partial hydrogenation produces trans fat. Artificial trans fat is unnatural compared to its ruminant brother and bc it is a fairly new addition to the human diet, the body doesn't really know how to break it down (my hypothesis based on readings and college classes dealing with food & nutrition/food & health/ food science). The chemical structure of TF is slightly diff from UFA. While UFA has a double bond on the cis side, TF's double bond is on the trans side, creating a different looking "kink". Because TF is fully hydrogenated, it remains stable, which is good for food developers long shelf life, stability, and temperature withstandability but not so good on your arteries. Just to show how much more detrimental trans fat is to your health, there was a health study from the Nurses Health study from 1980-1994, that showed for a 5% increase in energy consumed in the form of Saturated fat, there was a 17% increase of the risk of heart disease. For a 2% increase in trans fat, there was a 93% increase in risk. I'm sorry if I didn't really answer your question, but I just wanted to share what I learned.
+Roma Yi I appreciate your answer, and the fact you use the word hypothesis instead of theory ! ;)
+PratoFundo THANK YOU! Finally someone else that understands that the term "transfat" does more harm than good. Classifying all types of trans fats as being 100% identical and equal, is a VERY dumb thing to do. It promotes ignorance and people fighting for causes they misunderstand. I would rather eat natural bacon fat, than eat half as much fat in man made partially hydrogenated oil. Mis-directed people will say I am stupid because bacon has more "trans-fat" or they will say "what is partially-hydrogenated?". Humans have eaten animal fat since the beginning of man kind. Partially hydrogenated oil's, however, were invented in the 1900s! They are less than 100 years old! Obviously humans didn't not eat the first animal in the 1900'a. Also, the news people talk about "maybe ban trans fat" and the argument against it, is to list foods that use partially hydrogenated oil, but rather than targeting this new chemical, they casually call it "trans fat" instead. Therefore, instead of actually talking about banning JUST Partially Hydrogenated Oil, they fool everyone into thinking they are going to ban donuts, breakfast foods and junk food. I'm sorry, but those foods are not REQUIRED to be made with partially-hydrogenated oil, they can easily be made with palm kernel oil.
Jay H My guess: I know Hank has a degree in Biochemistry and he understand all the science stuff. But the simplification took place and became a little wonky. For most people won't be a problem, but…
Palm kernel oil… well, yes, they could. But it has own issues. 1) Kernel oil still is a saturated fat and not that healthy. 2) The palm crops aren't very good for the planet as well. Native forests are being felled.
This was super educational, all I ever see in the media are people labelling these things as good or bad but you've actually identified precisely what they are and why they are/'nt good for you.
Man i fucking love you ! as an aspiring fitness guy i find everything you discussed about fat and where fat goes when we exercise , tremendously useful.
Sci show , Hank, Michael and SciShow team , guys you represent what best humanity has to offer.Kudos.
Thanks!
We watched this in class and I was so confused because my teacher just said this guy is really at good explaining fat and I was like but it isn't just a guy, that's Hank
r u still schooling
This is one of those videos that explains a subject that I've tried to research on my own way better than any other source I've found.
Using Vertiasium's Snatoms? Awesome :D
Except for when you need to show double bonds which were a major subject in this video.
you now that it is possible to do a double bond in eh snatoms too
Man, I'm glad I subscribed to this channel. I love learning new things, but not through reading so this is perfect. And they upload videos frequently. Thank you, SciShow staff.
I like your white and gold shirt!
+Miles McMahan are you sure it is not black and blue? ;)
+Miles McMahan You jokeer! :D
+Miles McMahan this was the first thing I thought of as well. #thebattleContinues
+MrDinJavel what
+Miles McMahan Throwback Tuesday?
THIS is why I'm trying to go ketogenic. High fat diets help your brain functioning, satisfaction after meals, energy levels and much more.
how could it help the brain, if brain can not use fats as energy source? Eating little carbs makes your liver to deplete its carbs depot, because we are not very good at producing glucose from fats as quickly as brain requires
My brain uses ketones extremely well. It has to, given that I consume very little in the way of carbs
Awesome. This is my "edible chemistry" course summed up in almost 6 minutes
Super glad to see you collaborating with SciJoy! Awesome pair of videos. :)
Is his shirt black and blue or white n gold
#TEAMBEANSANDCAKE! What do you mean they're foods not colours?
+runningsandwich
Thats rather harsh XD
+Clashlolxbox we all know the truth, the world is black and gold! :D
his shirts black n blue im just relating to rhe dress
Clashlolxbox brown and blue
A study done in Norway showed that the fat/carb ratio was not important in the long run in terms of weight and heart health, it was the quality of the food that you eat that made the difference. They also found a higher total fat intake had a protective effect on your heart. It's only one study, but I think it makes a good point. Worry less about what you're eating and worry more about the quality.
Even though you said it ten times, I think it's very good to mention that quantity matters as much as possible.
This is the best explanation of what Fat is I have come across anywhere. Kudos.
I knew trans fats were bad but not that bad!!!
+Selina Cox trans fat = lower HDL, raises LDL, resulting in heart disease and increased chance of heart attack.
+Selina Cox Yup, since it doesn't really exist in nature, our bodies haven't evolved any clue what to do with it. (either positive uses, or protective measures)
At least saturated fat has some uses, like helping with the absorption of certain vitamins, but trans fat is really just a harmful, synthetic additive with no real redeeming qualities.
We were really better off just sticking with lard. It doesn't have a particularly healthy balance of fats, but at least your body recognizes everything in it.
Short rule of thumb:
-Unsaturated fats are like carbs and protein: just watch your calories, make sure you're eating a balance of the 3, and you're probably good.
-Saturated fats have some benefits, but moderation is important.
-Trans fats are terrible for you and don't do you any good.
+Selina Cox All partially hydrogenated Oil is a trans fat, but not all trans fat is a partially hydrogenated oil. Partially hydrogenated oil for a transfat, is more harmful than naturally occurring transfat.
+Jake Underhill I don't get why people explain that like it's some revelation. If we entirely cured cancer, that would only be a reduction of five percentage points. I guess that means we needn't bother!
The More You Know
Opened the video link from the chem teacher, and received a wonderful surprise! Thank you Hank!
Thank you for uploading this video. I understood everything you have said in this video. It helped me understand what fats were. Thank you again. :)
Oh man, how awesome. I must have missed this episode last winter. Since my wife and I are making handcrafted soaps (and because I'm just a big nerd) I have been researching different types of fats, their qualities in soap and how they differ molecularly. This video is a wealth of knowledge. And I think I must have snatoms now!!!!
Lost my shit when I saw the Snatoms. Derek is an absolute boss.
the best channel on RUclips by far !!! I never miss a single episode...love you guys !!!
3:24
Sci show, You are referencing the Lipid hypothesis, which has been revoked by numerous studies as being untrue. Saturated fats have no link to plaque build up or heart disease. In fact, the latest research has shown the top three causes of heart disease are high blood sugar, stress and smoking. All of these are things that happen to raise your cholesterol, which has supposedly been linked to saturated fats. Again this is untrue.
There is a grain of truth though: plaque can build up in your arteries, but it is not made up of sat-fats, it is made of dense LDLs, which are made from refined carbohydrates. Dense LDL builds up in the arteries and that causes inflammation.
Saturated fats do not cause heart disease; the study that made that claim was flawed and is no longer accepted by the scientific community. As for cholesterol, high cholesterol does not cause heart disease, otherwise Dwight D Eisenhower would not have had a heart attack with a cholesterol level of 165.
+frankydman This is correct though, It's not exactly true that LDL is made up of processed carbohydrates. The primary factor in manufacturing LDL is regularly over filling liver glycogen stores. When liver glycogen levels are full, remaining fructose gets manufactured into long chain triglycerides and because triglycerides are the limiting factor in the production of dense LDL, more LDL is produced. The primary source of fructose in the modern western diet is in processed carbohydrates. That's where the connection is. Of course glucose can also fill lever glycogen stores, but it's more likely to be used to fill skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue stores(depending on which are more insulin sensitive). The main point is that you ant to eat carbohydrates appropriate for your insulin sensitivity and activity levels and only consume fructose when your goal is to restore liver glycogen levels after a fasting period(sleep) or after intense exercise to avoid ketogenisis.
Fat should be your final consideration after factoring in your minimum protein consumption in order to reach your calorie goals.
Eating healthy fats like omega-3 from fish oil(DHA in particular) is a way to improve insulin sensitivity further and saturated fat overall is not dangerous when you're not overeating.
+frankydman The majority of the scientific establishment, as well as major health authorities such as the American Heart Association, still recommend limiting the consumption of saturated fats based on a wide acceptance that they contribute to heart disease, based on decades of research. There is plenty of controversy, but you are misleading people by talking about the matter as though it is done with and widely accepted as false when it clearly isn't.
What's more - this sentence: "high cholesterol does not cause heart disease, otherwise Dwight D Eisenhower would not have had a heart attack with a cholesterol level of 165" - is a logical fallacy because it presumes that in order for high cholesterol to be ONE cause of heart disease it must be THE ONLY possible cause of heart disease. This is like saying that smoking cannot cause lung cancer because some non-smoker who worked in the radon factory died of lung cancer.
I'm not misleading anything or anyone. I only state facts, and If you look back through the history, and the studies done, there is nothing that supports the lipid hypothesis.
The lipid hypothesis suggest two things essentially: eating saturated fats raises cholesterol, high cholesterol causes heart disease. Neither of these are true, because the study that put it forward was flawed.
In the 1950s, biochemist Ancel Keys proposed the lipid hypothesis based on a "six country study" that included Italy, Japan, US, UK, Australia, and Canada. There seemed to be an obvious trendline, where Japan and Italy had low rates of heart disease and low sat fat consumption. and US with high fat intake, high hear disease.
One problem, the "six country study" was in fact a TWENTY-TWO country study, and the results were all over the place. For example, Holland and Norway had high rates of Fat consumption, but little heart disease. Chile had low fat consumption, but a high rate of heart disease. But Keys wanted to make an impact, so he cherry picked his data and presented it as accurate.
As for the "decades of research" by what do you refer? No study has ever shown a link between saturated fats and heart disease, while over 30 studies have shown that just the opposite is true.
For example- Michael DeBakey, a world-renown cardiac surgeon, once did research into this hypothesis involving more than 1600 patients... and he found no correlation between cholesterol and heart disease.
And my statement is not a logical fallacy; that is just the point; how can high cholesterol cause heart disease when clearly, Eisenhower had a heart attack with a cholesterol level of 165? There must be something else, and that something else, as shown by recent research, is inflammation of heart tissue due to a build up of dense LDL.
frankydman
I'm not saying I disagree with you, but the position of most medical authorities does, right down to the American Heart Association.
But as for the logical fallacy part - yes, I stand by what I said: that is a logical fallacy. If you're unfamiliar with it, I suggest looking up "necessity and sufficiency."
+frankydman
I agree on what you say about the lipid hypothesis and get annoyed with talking about unsaturated and saturated fats as healthy and unhealthy, respectively, but Sedrin is right, your comment about Eisenhower is incorrect and this is a classical logical fallacy.
Yes, there must be something else, but that doesn't mean that high cholesterol isn't *a* cause of heart attacks. Only if we knew that heart attacks only have one single cause (which we don't, obviously), then we could conclude that cholesterol can't be that cause, because we have encountered a counter example (assuming no measurement error). Here's a different example: The ground gets wet when it rains, but it also gets wet when someone washes their car. Now when the ground is wet, but it hasn't rained, I can't conclude that raining doesn't cause wetness of the ground.
More generally, from A -> B (read: from A follows B) you can't conclude !A -> !B (from not A follows not B), which is the fallacy. You can only conclude !B -> !A (from not B follows not A), in this case meaning that a patient that doesn't have a heart attack can't have high cholesterol - and that doesn't make much sense here either, as you will agree, because all of these things are risk factors rather than logical necessities that can be tested this way.
Sedrin,
you're right, the authorities haven't changed their recommendations. A while back I saw an interview with the German food administration office on exactly this topic (blaing saturated fats and promoting high carb dietary regimes) and they said that they are obviously aware of these issues, but also of the very shaky current nature of food sciences and that they don't want to change their recommendations and confuse people until they are certain that they have to, which they don't think they do, still claiming that at least you won't get harmed from the "balanced" diet they are recommending. I don't agree with that attitude or their specific recommendations (I personally tend towards thinking of carbs as bad and saturated fats as good, for what it's worth), but then again I can basically take any position that I want on this and find evidence that supports it, because food sciences is just such a shitty field, largely built around correlational evidence, small sample sizes, short term experiments and terrible statistics.
Out of my several hours of reading various articles, some studies, opinions about the good and the bad, recommendations by organizations like the AHA, and other research, I had a decent idea how this all worked, but your video would have made things so much easier, lol. This pretty much sums it all up, even if there are a few details missing.
So in layman's terms, don't eat McDonalds.
more like don't eat jack in the box. they shamelessly cook with trans fats. their bacon cheddar potato wedges had as much as 13 grams of the stuff.
Or fast food in general, really.
no, not even. eating mcdonalds is fine if you just dont eat too much.
I watch most of the SciShow videos, and the ones with matarial I've already studied in university I tend to enjoy the most. Because science is made better when explained better, which is why I love watching SciShow.
Love it when he says, "But this is SciShow. Let's go there!"
One of the best (clear & informative) quick summations/explanations on these topics I've ever seen. Guess that's why I'm happy to be a contributor (even if only a small one) to this channel on Patreon!
watching this while eating a ton of ice cream, some regrets.
Very clear. There's so much noise out there and I was getting hopelessly confused. Thank you Hank!
There's no reason to think saturated fats are bad for you as the evidence suggests they have no ill health effects and indeed the body can handle them just fine. Saturated fat is good for cooking as it is relatively stable. Polyunsaturated fat is the worst for cooking and is unstable. Oils/fats high in polyunsaturated fats should be stored in a cool, dark place, and consumed quickly. It is also deemed a good idea to balance omega 3 and 6. So different fats need to be used and cared for appropriately.
+Matthew Mitchell Thank you.
+Matthew Mitchell I beg to differ. Tons of studies show that saturated fats have a very ill effect on cardiovascular health. Scishow agrees. Care to link to some studies suggesting otherwise?
+Adonis Not very good studies, the link between saturated fat and cardiovascular health is more tenuous than we thought. The one thing we know that is definitely true is that trans-fats are just awful and you should never consume them.
ask heart doctors about endothelial function after a life time of bad omega 6 and 3 ratios. you will be singing a different tune.
yup could not agree more.
This is such a clear and well done explanation to something most of us don't know about. Keep up the fantastic work!
It's important to distinguish between dietary saturated fat and the saturated fat we "see" in our blood work. It's not intuitive but eating saturated fats won't increase that metric in your blood work. It's eating excessive carbohydrates that become transformed into saturated fat- that's the problem. This is the saturated fat that is observed in your blood work and is correlated with an increased likelihood of heart disease.
so explain why all the high carb low fat vegans are lean as and at the top of thier game when it comes to health and fitness.
there are millions of non-vegans who are also extremely healthy...
Yes.but in studies done on large groups of people vegans were the only ones with a healthy bmi.
Followed by vegatarians then pescatarians last on the list were meat eaters
Shane Wakelin and im trying to have a disccusion, not an argument/flamewar
Excellent lesson Hank! You taught me so many new things. Bravo! Please, more health-related, detailed science vids like these.
Snatoms hype!!!
For people interested in the dietary and health side of science, there's Healthcare Triage with host Dr Aaron Carroll. Healthcare Triage is one of the Green brothers' educational projects so that's awesome!
Also, I'm really happy that you're using Snatoms. Derek from Veritasium had a brilliant idea and he went for it, and it looks like he has succeeded.
Yay! Snatoms!
First time I come across this channel but already love it and subscribed 30 seconds in.
this wasnt up long enough for somone to watch the whole thing and its already at 360 views
+Justin Pond Because the view count increases the very second you click the video, whether or not you watch the entire thing has no bearing. Just FYI...not trolling or anything, lol.
Sci-show gets its facts straight regardless of the field, and that makes me HAPPY!
I would love to see more dietary science! this helped me a lot with deciding what to buy. How about one on the effects of adding small amounts of fruit juice to your water (lemon water) ive heard its good for your kidneys but im not too sure...
+Oakley Wariner Good or not, it sure is delicious xD
+Oakley Wariner I doubt it has any significant effect directly (it's just heavily diluted fruit juice).
That said, not getting enough water can be rough on your kidneys, so I expect it greatly helps people who don't get enough water normally by making it tastier so they do.
It also probably reduces how often people reach for other beverages (many of which are full of stuff your kidneys then need to filter out of your blood).
So, if you don't get enough water or want to drink less soft drinks, it's a great way to do that, but it's direct effect is probably insignificant (otherwise, lemonade considered extremely healthy for you).
+DynamicWorlds I drink water once per month or once per few months, you could say I'd die without fanta haha. Unhealthy I know, but it isn't a priority right now. Maybe later in life when I'm about to die or get fat.
+dependOnYour own. you're going to be spending a lot of time at the dentists.
+aidanbk Depends how long the sugars stick around in the mouth. Hell, from my understanding starches are more dangerous to teeth *because* they stick around longer.
Silly me didn't look at my subscriptions for a while and so didn't see this before my nutrition test. *sigh* Thanks Hank! This helps my understanding a ton.
Cis fats and Trans fats? Don't let Tumblr hear you.
+Aditya Mokkarala LOLOL
You have no right to judge trans fats! Cool it with the microaggressions!
+Christoph13131 Cis and trans have very defined meanings. And, in fact, those same meanings apply both to chemicals and to societal and biological designations we give things. Cis just means the same as. Trans means the opposite of. That's a bit of a simplification, but that's more or less how they work.
Silverizael
All right, everyone, the fun is over.
:P
+Christoph13131 All fats are beautiful
I've seen so many vids on this topic and this explains it the best. So clear. Thank you!!
So am I saturated or unsaturated?
+Fat Sam saturated
+Fat Sam Depends... Are there other Fat Sam molecules really tightly packed by you? Or do they tend to float away? :P
+Fat Sam You're solid so I'd go with saturated.
One of the few unbiased channels out there! Keep it up.
Good video, but as someone that had biology and is fairly interested in how what each kind of calorie does in your body and how it works. I haven't heard anything new in this video :(
+TheHadesShade ruclips.net/video/00jbG_cfGuQ/видео.html This video might be a good place to start in an understanding about how the body breaks down food into energy. I don't think the video is explicit about what the difference is between proteins, fats, and carbohydrates... but the short version is that each type of food is catabolized into molecules that can enter the cycle detailed in the video, along with some byproducts (like ammonia from protein).
I hope that helps!
-Sarah Meismer
+SciShow ah thanks, will take a look at it!
+TheHadesShade Scishow is introductory, opening up complex subjects to the non-specialised among us. What you're looking for is far more in depth information, and will either require as little as a trip to the library, or as much as an enrolment at a university, depending on how deep you want to dive into it (:
You are a special snow flake
there is no difference between calories, calories are a measurement of potential energy
This is great revision. I have a biochem metabolism exam in like 2 weeks. I freaking live this show.
That explains fat, but what about phat, can you explain phat?
schel sullivan what about THICC?
And what about *Z U C C*
What the phuck !!
Now that you've explained phat, explain tat.
Phat was really popular in the 90s, but you don't hear much about it anymore.
I understood this far better than any other youtube video I have watched on the subject.
I love butter and bacon and eat both daily. They have helped me gain and maintain a healthy weight and the doctor says I am perfectly healthy. Sedentary lifestyles will kill you faster than meat fat will.
+Mysticfox2010 Yes - exercise is key
It really depends on who. There has been cases of sporty and seemingly perfectly healthy people who died of a sudden attack. Exercising is important, no question about that, but a good dietary lifestyle might be even more important.
big fan of scishow , great video hank , keep em coming
Can you make a video on veganism and health? I would love some unbiased information which I have a hard time finding.
I've always found this subject mind numbingly dull, but that was fascinating... This is why I sub!
Everyone hates on fat. I eat fat and feel better than eating lot's of carbs.
You've got some freakin SNATOMS
I pledged to that kickstarter, too, but they aren't supposed to arrive till like march. You must be special.
3:15 This oddly helps me understand tumblr buzzwords better
So stoked to see you using Snatoms! :D
"Let's get to the heart of fat..." Before The opposite happens?
Thank you for yet another very informative episode. Keep up the great work!
humans need to eat some stuff only found in animals and some othere stuff only found in plant?
its almost as if we are omnivores.
And we can digest both plants and animals.
Great explanation of something that is quite complicated!
So I know this is going to come up because this is the internet so here it goes:
Fats are not found only in animals. When Hank says "fat" he doesn't mean the chewy stuff on the edge of a steak. He means the chemicals that he describes, which are found in more than just meat. There are even pictures used as examples as to where the different fats can come from and it includes peanuts and olives. So before you militant vegetarians or vegans use this video as ammunition for your 'cause', I'd suggest watching the whole video and actually thinking about it first.
+William Bradey (Test) It's true, saturated fats are not always on animals and unsaturated fats are not always from vegetables. Fish and coconuts for instance. Further, lean meat has almost no fat in it. In fact, eating only lean meat will make you starve to death in a process called "rabbit starvation".
the one thing vegetarians don't seem to understand is that no matter how many "benefits" they throw out, people won't switch to vegetarian because nobody gives a Fuck. Lots of people just don't want to think about it 24/7.
Being vegan is an ethical choice. That's it. You can be healthy or unhealthy living either lifestyles. If you don't give a fuck about animals, that's your choice. I choose to give a fuck. 😊 #notamilitantkindofvegan
+William Bradey (Test) Sorry not everyone is as smart as you. You don't need to be a jerk about it.
Rick Sanchez I wasn't being a jerk. I just beat the jerks to the punch.
Reminds me of the bioorganic chemistry class in high school. Arguably the scariest class in the school. Just saying you took that class gave people chills.
>Cis fats good
>Trans fats bad
triggered tbh famalam
The Titanic was cis-Atlantic. The prefix cis means on one side of. The prefix trans means crossing.
Funny that it’s the straight one that’s called “trans.”
It makes me so happy to see an endorsement of a thing just coz it's cool. You're like I have access to a medium of expression so here is a cool thing... love it.
still in the under 200 club
+jazzie man Right on me too man!
...kilos?
Having just gone through a two month intensive chemistry course, this was a lot easier to quickly understand than it would without it! Great video, and lovely to put a lot of the knowledge into better perspective!
saturated fats are gooood for you
yup the atkins diet contains mostly saturated fat.Guess what?Dr Atkins ended up fat and died of a heart attack from eating his own diet.So yea saturated fats are good for you
Atkins died of a head injury
+Shane Wakelin he also gained 63 pounds of fluid during the coma that followed his hospital admission. I know, fact checking is haaaaaarddddddd.
+Jon Vaillancourt You conveniently left out the fact that he was 117 kilos with a history of heart attacks.( which could have been why he fell)And the fact that his wife refused an autopsy.Yea fact checking is so hard.If his diet was so good then whybwas he so fat before he died?
prove it.
Wieeee I'm studying Chemistry and we're talking about isomers now. I love seeing it in nature like this!
INB4 vegans talking about "naturally alkaline diets" and avocados.
+StoreBrand the prior is a buzzword that makes no scientific sense and is unfounded
avocados taste fucking delicious though
Carson Troeh I hate avocados, they're slightly bitter and mostly flavorless to me... maybe I've just had shitty avocados.
StoreBrand I like to put them on sandwiches, avocados alone are just kind of nasty.
+StoreBrand That may actually be a result of where you live. You can definitely tell a difference if you live near where avocados are grown, like in CA, than if you live in an area that has to have them shipped over long distances.
StoreBrand
But guacamole tho...
I always enjoy a good explanation, good job guys!
Lol, the source for saturated fat is so weak and funny to read. Summary: "Um, like we think saturated fat might be a little bit bad for you, maybe?"
I think I'll stick with my butter and/or coconut oil and eggs. Though I'm cutting back on processed bacon.
This is what I love about SciShow... Freakin' science explained without editorials baby!
3:12
Fat: addressing controversial gender topics before it was cool.
Thank you so much, this makes more sense than the run of the mill explanations.
Show me the evidence of saturated fat building plaque in the arteries. Show me one study. One. No? Well, that's because fat don't randomly float around the blood stream suddenly getting stuck in the artery.
Get your facts straight, please.
1,420,000 results
scholar.google.fr/scholar?q=study+on+trans+fats&hl=fr&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjdsN77povOAhVHKMAKHQeIClUQgQMIGjAA
I know you're gonna tell me it's trans, not saturated, but I want to make sure people aren't misled into thinking that the video is all wrong.
I've read so much crap on the internet, like "safety belts are dangerous, therefore noone should wear them", that I am extremely suspicious about claims like yours. More often than not, those who make them have financial interests in confusing people, or they are simply trolls.
As for saturated fat, I've read it may be linked with increase of cholesterol levels.
You searched for trans fats, idiot.
Saturdated Fats are NOT trans fats.
FunkyWeezy Can you even read ? Literally my first sentence was: "I know you're gonna tell me it's trans, not saturated".
I basically eat sticks of butter in my diet over the last year. Results: my cholesterol is up, but only the HDL from 60mg/dL to 75mg/dL. All of the people I know with cholesterol problems 1) are obese and 2) eat lots of sugar.
yeah still what does that have to do with saturated fat? What your opinion is saturated fat is somehow the same as trans? like fuck off lmao
He is basically a real life Professor Frink. Or am only I seeing this?!
Awesome video... thanks buddy! (yes we are buddies now)
Make one about carbs as well. When i quit eating them and increased my fat intake (by basically eating cheese and cream (no crazy processed stuff) i went from 100+ down to 80+ kg and i have a TON more energy and i feel really strong and healthy. Im not a slave under food anymore. I eat one to three times a day. It's very seldom im sick though i got a cold right now. But everybody is sick here now! Im a vegetarian since 15 years so i only eat this cheese and cream plus quorn and vegetables (mainly green and white ones). I want someone who isn't biased by tradition, culture or lobbyism to tell me this is bad, if it is. Different - yes. Bad - no ..? When i became a vegetarian (before it became a normal thing basically) people around me told it was the end for me .. im still alive and i have muscles (proteins wasn't an issue after all?). By the way, im not sure if it's because i have a dog and walk a lot, but i have a great condition now and can run fast and long with minor breathing. Before this i couldn't do either and with heavy breathing along with aching knees.
You bet i become a bit defensive when someone speaks up against LCHF due to tradition, culture or lobbyism. I know how much it has helped me and i still see people suffering with unhealthy bodies and selfshaming when eating lots of carbs along with fat.
interesting, I have always viewed high fat diets as unhealthy. there are quite a few studies that show low carb diets being very unhealthy, mainly because your body requires carbs for its basic functions. I would argue that a higher carb diet is better, if in doubt eat more fruit even though they are high carb.
+hyperbolic fuckboi Carbs are not needed at all. You can eat zero carbs and be fine. Look it up!
+hyperbolic fuckboi i haven't eaten a fruit in at least two years! The problem is that if you go above about 50g carbs the licht will not work. If you do that you'll gain a lot of weight fast. I've read you need about 25g carbs for your brain. I've never had to add any carbs to reach that limit and I've never felt that my brain didn't work because of eating too few. As I'm diagnosed both bipolar and Asperger I don't know if my brain acts differently though. I am very conscious about how efficient my brain is performing though and I can tell I've became me even more focused.
Just as I started with lchf our head of "food and health" in our government came out and vaguely accused lchf for possibly being the reason behind an increase in strokes for males 30-40. No facts or studies to back that up at all. Maybe take a look at Starcraft and energy drinks.. This is what I m ant about tradition , culture and lobbyism. It's so corrupt. Sugars and carbs are such a huge deal business wise.
Well, that was a nice, fast and simple way of explaining fats. Thanks SciShow.
all things in moderation
That molecular modelling kit looks really cool!
ARE THOSE SNATOMSSS o_0
+Sulfur Hexaflouride Oh you said it
Oh yeah boi.
the video is so cool and useful and very well explained!!! thank you so much!!!
+SciShow You guys are completely wrong about saturated fats, please do some research on this topic.
The idea that saturated fat is bad for you came from the assumption that eating saturated fat such animal fat caused high cholesterol, which has thoroughly been disproven. On the other hand, polyunsaturated fat might be good for you if manufacturers didn't mess with it chemically to give it a longer shelf life. Our knowledge of what foods and medicines are good for us is always tainted by the fact that research is done by someone trying to sell us something. "There are lies, damn lies and statistics" - Benjamin Disraeli.
moderation.
Bs
One of the best explanations I have heard 👏🏻👏🏻
saturated fat is hella good for you
As Hank has mentioned, too much of it... not so much
Math Magician highly unagreed upon in the science community
+T. Yoshisaur Munchakoopas cite sources
eh horrible ketogenic diet and heart disease
+hyperbolic fuckboi so no you are wrong
A really great video! Good job in explaining so deep the subject in so little time.
fat is not the enemy. Carbohydrates and sugars are way less healthy for you comparatively
+RebelWinterwolf I think both fat and carbs have had a bad rap, we need both but the important thing is getting the right balance
+RebelWinterwolf It's more complicated than this, but the general rule of thumb is: Eat carbs is you're going to do something that'll make you breath hard I.E. sprinting, HIIT's, etc. And eat fats for everything else. You don't want to eat carbs if all you're doing is sitting down at the computer for hours. Keep this in mind and you'll be good.
completely wrong, sugar is the primary energy source and is more quickly metabolised. fat is more likely to be stored as body fat than carbs as carbs must be converted to fat. also fat is linked to more diseases than carbs hence why the ketogenic diet is an atrocious diet and why more high carbohydrate diet are linked with longer life span and better athletic performance.
fruits veg starch beans .... bad for you? mmmmm no. unless you butter salt fry candy coat refine burn or cream.
well said balenced diet would be stack of potatoes herbs n spice side of tea hand full of nuts bowl of berries on a bed of greens and if you must have a carcuss throw a sliver for a condiment
well done ,one of the best professors out there
what the fuck! Saturated fat does not clogs up your arteries. Read
Good Calories, Bad Calories: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom on Diet, Weight Control, and Disease by Gary Taubes and you'll see why saturated fats are so healthy.
Why We Get Fat: And What to Do About It. 2010. Gary Taubes
They're just popular books, not scientific studies. The vast majority of scientific studies point towards saturated fats being harmful at worst, and neutral at best.
Gary Taubes puts science and empirical evidence at the epitome of his research. You're pretty delusional if you think otherwise. The scientific consensus that you are referring to once proclaimed trans fat to be good for human consumption. The truth is, these scientific consensus was bought out by big companies paying them big money.
Yeah, saturated fats doesn't clog shit. It's painful to see that this channel gets in wrong too.
nutritionfacts.org/video/the-saturated-fat-studies-set-up-to-fail/
Gee, I wonder why our number 1 killer is hearth attack lol.
Fabulous descriptions! Thanks you!
Now watch the SJWs accuse sci show of "fat shaming."
Towelzz
Srsly?
I wasn't completely oblivious to how fats work, but this explanation made everything very clear.
it's a myth saturated fat is worse for you
Unless it's from nuts and seeds
+Walter White saturated fat from animals increase cholesterol nuts and seeds don't.
+Walter White lol I'm not trolling. Just look at Michael Gregor he has tons of videos on nuts. Plus nuts have fiber, antioxidants, and good fats like poly and mono which can lower cholesterol while fats from animals raise not only that it comes with worse stuff like animal protein, cholesterol, choline
+Walter White saturated fat clogs arteries and give you osteoporosis
+Jonathan Dittmar no it does not. saturated fat comes in many different lengths from a medium chain like lauric acid which the body may convert to monolaurin and has antimicrobial properties to a longer chain like stearic acid which is necessary for many metabolic processes essential to proper health. saturated fat is stable and improves your immune system, cardiovascular health, endocrine system and stabilizers blood sugar among many other things. but what it certainly doesn't do odds clog arteries and it definitely doesn't cause osteoporosis