Hey everyone 👋, this is part 15 of the Hardcourt Drama series. The Hercog/Görges scene was from part 3 of the drama series which was deleted a couple of months ago. Enjoy 🎾
I absolutely love that you put in captions for every part of this series. I'm deaf, so this really helps me understand what's going on, other than listening to the auto generated captions that RUclips has, which are FULL of grammatical errors. You are my favorite tennis channel, and I hope you keep doing this for every video as long as you live.
@@Sir3gar This is not according to the rules. You cannot have your cake and eat it too. The only way for the out ball from Goerges to even count - and therefore give Hercog the point on that play - would be for the challenge to be made, overturning the "out" call on Hercog's previous shot, AND THEN rule that what comes after that point to stand. That's NOT how the rules of tennis works. For that to have happened, Hercog would then have to NOT make the challenge of the "out" call on her own shot, but if she chose that, then the "out" call would stand, thus giving the point to Goerges. But when a line judge's call is challenged, only ONE result can be realized, by rule: the line judge's call is affirmed, thus Goerges wins the point, or the line judge's call is overturned as in this case, and then the point is replayed. Because NO MATTER WHAT RESULTED FROM GOERGES' SHOT, THE LINE JUDGE'S CLEARLY AUDIBLE "OUT" CALL WAS MADE, THUS IMPACTING WHAT CAME AFTER. Of course, what came after was Goerges' shot ends up long, but by then - BY RULE - the rally of the point is permanently suspended pending the outcome of the challenge. The "out" call could impact also the ability of the line judges on Hercog's side of the court from focusing, because they are thinking the point is now dead. This is why BY RULE what comes after is typically thrown aside. So, what Hercog was pleading for here, was to have the "out" call overturned by challenge, which actually happened (having her cake), AND THEN ruling the subsequent shot by Goerges to be out, thus giving Hercog the point (eating it too). But by the rules of tennis, that's too punitive. The fair ruling is to replay the point, thus giving Hercog another chance to win the point legitimately, in lieu of losing the point had the "out" call stood with no challenge. That's fair....
@@Bitshitter: No, you're wrong about that. The "out" call came after Goerges hit the return, therefore it didn't hinder her shot. Because Goerges' return was long, the point should have been awarded to Hercog. Situations like this are not uncommon.
You are so absolutely correct. I've never seen a supervisor/referee overturn an umpire's decision. Hercog won the point twice. Her ball was in on the challenge and had there never been a challenge, George's ball was out. It's bullshit
@@Dom-yv4nq ikr..I also thought Hercog was right on this and the supervisor didn't do anything(as usual)..it's as if the supervisor is a way of confirming the umpire's decision so that more drama can be prevented
The umpire has the final say on all matters of judgment. The supervisor is only there to clarify any questions on the rules. The supervisor is never going to overrule the umpire's judgment on a judgment call even if the call was bad. The perception that supervisors are "useless" is only because players continually call the supervisor over decisions that they can't do anything about.
Siegemund is straight up lying! Christ, that is the most obvious challenge I may have ever seen. No player would take their hand off their stick like that
@@101poumi no she fucking doesn't. The only decent thing she could do is to give the point to her opponent in good sportsmanship but that is lost these days. If the opposing player wants the supervisor the rules state he/she must have him/her. The nerve... to come and say "play" on when you know you've won an undeserving decision.
Hercog was ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. Call came VERY late. That is sh***y umpiring and should be HIGHLIGHTED!! It comes down to common sense, not dealing with a gray area of mili seconds of timing. Goerges was wrong here, she didn't have any arguments about her side of the story ! She didn't have a say in it!
Yup. Goerges played the ball before the call came and she hit it out. It getting challenged late because the umpire called it late is stupid umpiring. It should of never been replayed, it was 100% Hercog's point.
These videos are never long enough. So well done, TA. The subtitles, the editing, the graphics, explanation sometimes to give more context. Love this channel and thanking the creator whole 💓 heartedly.
I hope someone does the same to Georges one day ... “Can we play please? She already made a decision” while she damn know it was a late call and her ball was far out ...
yes if polona can't challenge the ball, then goerges should challenge her own ball and if it's in, then replay, if it's out it's point to hercog. Players need to appeal to their opponent as the umpires and supervisors are too pig headed and weak to change any previous decision made
@@p.a.a3059 u think that's negative? lol listen carefully and you will see how brilliant what he said is. he pointed out mistakes and he points out what she needs to do to win, then he said he believes she can win this 1 point at the time... good coach don't just inflate their players ego, they point out what needs to improve to win. if i wanted cheerleaders i would hire one not a coach
I agree. He’s saying it how it is. What is sugar costing this situation going to do for his player? Nothing. He’s trying to reel her back in to get her to see the way she’s going isn’t right.
Vincent Tran u got a Point but in this situation it’s better to motivate the player, warm her of things the opponent did different or better, tell her what to focus on and give her examples of what to do next and how to change it. It doesn’t matter what happened before because it’s over anyway and u can’t change it. He should be more positive and tell her what to do and not what she did wrong.
Usually you appreciate Darren Cahill commentating alongside Fowler or Courier or one of the McEnroes, but seeing him coaching Halep and trying to motivate her shows a different side of him
He is really a dickhead. He argues the way a dickhead kid does. Keeps asking a question that he wants to hear the umpire answer that has little relevance to his point. He’s the biggest tosser of any sport
That umpire in the Polona Hercog match is absolutely ridiculous ! Also , I’m glad Polona won the point that she shouldn’t have replayed in the first place.
I'm wondering why players keep asking for the supervisor when a decision is already made. I've never ever seen a supervisor change a decision of the chair umpire.So whats the point of calling for the sv? :)
@@bialko1313 Thank you for the link.Different situation.Radwanska called for the supervisor,but he didn't come to the court.The players and the umpire clarified the situation amongst themselves before he could interfere. On the other hand i'm very curious what the supervisor would have done if the umpire still wasn't aware of her mistake after all the discussion. I think if he didn't watch the match,he wouldn't have changed the umpire's decision.
Awesome 😍 Will you do the same for the 2020 season? Australian Open is just a month away and I am already looking forward to see all the drama going on there lol 😄
10:40 She's completely correct here. The point should not have been replayed. The call was late and therefore did not influence the shot. And since the shot was out, the challenge should have resulted in a point, not a replay.
6:50 If the ball is hit believing the previous shot is in and there is no call before playing that shot, then that shot is called out and challenged. The umpire must watch the return shot, or trust the line call of the return shot. The line call of the return shot was out and the ball was over 1 metre out, yet the umpire still decided to ignore the line call and make the wrong decision. Why is there not a recording with an overall view to look at to back up these type of line calls. After all it is televised, so couldn't someone have asked the commentators what happened. Should umpires be accountable for their bad decisions and fined or removed.
The umpire was just making up the rules as they went along. They basically admitted they weren't sure and were just going with their gut instinct. In a case where the umpire makes a judgment call but isn't sure, if another official (linesperson) says they are sure that the ball was definitely out, the umpire should then overturn their ruling. The referee should have been aware of this too. Upon hearing that a linesperson had told Hercog that they were sure the ball had gone out, the referee should have said to the umpire "are you sure that it landed in". If the umpire says yes, then call stands (regardless of the fact the umpire is wrong). But if the umpire says no, then overturn and give Hercog the point because another official was sure. This is all in the rules, which an umpire and referee should both know. I think they should be fined in this instance - it's not just a bad decision, they didn't follow the official rules.
If the line Umpire said Georges' ball was out, then Hercog should have been awarded the point. The call was well after Georges made contact with the ball. So if Georges' ball was out, Hercog should have been awarded the point.
Bonaventure knew her previous shot was out and yet didnt say anything until she could use it as an argument against the umpire when she got a dodgy call against herself
Electronic device calling the ball out instantly in the same way it makes a sound when the ball touches the net when serving and automatic update of the scores. Job done
All the pro's know the rules. It always makes me laugh when one of the pro's tries to get away with something their opponent is arguing with the umpire about (and is right). Georges saying it is the umpire's call against Hercog and that they should just play on - she could easily just put her hands up and say "yeah I missed and it was a late call so take the point"
This is not about the rules. In tennis, you have to think for yourself AND ONLY FOR YOURSELF. The goal is to win the match and yes sometimes in those cases, you have to shut up and run away from the drama. This might look ugly but this is the reality, specially in woman's tennis.
I've seen several videos where the supervisor was called to question a call from the person in the chair. After all of them, I do have to ask... why bother? All of them, with no exception, they are there to listen to just one person, and then agree with what it is said. And, with no exception as well, to tell the player that their appeal was denied. With the shittiest excuses. The "at this time, we are going with this decision". It's at all times. They should rename that person role to "umpire validator", because that's all they do. No point whatsoever in calling them.
We are able to put rovers ad helicopters on Mars, but the issue of missed calls still exists. Yes, hawkeye is a solution although not perfect, but not used on gravel. I wonder if it is possible to have pressure sensitive courts...
Not only the supervisors never change referees decisions but everytime they have to listen the whole story of what happened. Like you are the supervisor of a tennis tournament and you are not watching the games?
The should implement the umpire working with the line judges more to ensure a right call. The umpire only has two eyes and calling a meeting with all the judges can ensure better accuracy like what they do in basketball
I have never seen a single instance where the supervisor came n made any difference to the conflict .. it stays the same apart from lots of time gone waste
can we have a moment of silence for all the innocent racquets out there that have had their life taken way too early cuz of the racquet abuse by their owners 😔
I'm really not sure why they have tournament supervisors. it is basically like having a second umpire. the supervisor pretty much always goes with the umpire
в последнем эпизоде, какая нахера Алена если ее звать Елена.. и что за идиотизм "судья абсолютно не прав" если он крикнул аут одновременно с ее ударом это трактуется как отсутствие помехи. комментатор мало того что имени теннисистки русско говорящей не знает называя ее совершенно другим, так еще и разжигает ненависть к судье не верное трактуя эпизод. это при том что у него перед глазами куча информации в том числе доступ к просмотру повторов в любых скоростях. идиот какой-то. как звать его кто знает?
10:20 what i don't understand about this game, these are professional matches and there is tv coverage. Umpires are only human so they can make mistakes, but they seem to be like little hitlers who will not accept anyone elses opinion over their own. Replay the recording to show the position of the ball and then decide.
@@Indlvarn There are dozens of examples of conflicts between umpire and players. Do you see any other players interfere in the conflict against their opponents? I didnt like Julia's behaviour.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey everyone 👋, this is part 15 of the Hardcourt Drama series. The Hercog/Görges scene was from part 3 of the drama series which was deleted a couple of months ago. Enjoy 🎾
I was gonna ask about that LOL. Thats for upload.
And for which the third part was removed?
When is part 16 coming out?
I couldn’t tell if Goerges’ shot was out or not. But it definitely was a late call.
I absolutely love that you put in captions for every part of this series. I'm deaf, so this really helps me understand what's going on, other than listening to the auto generated captions that RUclips has, which are FULL of grammatical errors. You are my favorite tennis channel, and I hope you keep doing this for every video as long as you live.
Samuel Hawkins I'm deaf as well, this channel helps a lot!
"Supervisor, the referee just tried to shoot me with a rifle!"
"Sorry but we have to go with this decision"
Yeah, calling the supervisor are mostly useless effort...That point clearly should have gone to Hercog!
Zelmerlow I swear 🤦🏿♀️
@@Sir3gar This is not according to the rules. You cannot have your cake and eat it too. The only way for the out ball from Goerges to even count - and therefore give Hercog the point on that play - would be for the challenge to be made, overturning the "out" call on Hercog's previous shot, AND THEN rule that what comes after that point to stand. That's NOT how the rules of tennis works.
For that to have happened, Hercog would then have to NOT make the challenge of the "out" call on her own shot, but if she chose that, then the "out" call would stand, thus giving the point to Goerges. But when a line judge's call is challenged, only ONE result can be realized, by rule: the line judge's call is affirmed, thus Goerges wins the point, or the line judge's call is overturned as in this case, and then the point is replayed.
Because NO MATTER WHAT RESULTED FROM GOERGES' SHOT, THE LINE JUDGE'S CLEARLY AUDIBLE "OUT" CALL WAS MADE, THUS IMPACTING WHAT CAME AFTER. Of course, what came after was Goerges' shot ends up long, but by then - BY RULE - the rally of the point is permanently suspended pending the outcome of the challenge. The "out" call could impact also the ability of the line judges on Hercog's side of the court from focusing, because they are thinking the point is now dead. This is why BY RULE what comes after is typically thrown aside.
So, what Hercog was pleading for here, was to have the "out" call overturned by challenge, which actually happened (having her cake), AND THEN ruling the subsequent shot by Goerges to be out, thus giving Hercog the point (eating it too). But by the rules of tennis, that's too punitive. The fair ruling is to replay the point, thus giving Hercog another chance to win the point legitimately, in lieu of losing the point had the "out" call stood with no challenge. That's fair....
@@Bitshitter: No, you're wrong about that.
The "out" call came after Goerges hit the return, therefore it didn't hinder her shot.
Because Goerges' return was long, the point should have been awarded to Hercog.
Situations like this are not uncommon.
The umpire made a mistake; fortunately, the supervisor was called.
Said no one ever.
So..are we just gonna ignore how supervisors just come into the court to say hello and just go back?
You are so absolutely correct. I've never seen a supervisor/referee overturn an umpire's decision. Hercog won the point twice. Her ball was in on the challenge and had there never been a challenge, George's ball was out. It's bullshit
@@Dom-yv4nq ikr..I also thought Hercog was right on this and the supervisor didn't do anything(as usual)..it's as if the supervisor is a way of confirming the umpire's decision so that more drama can be prevented
Ikrrrrrr!!
The umpire has the final say on all matters of judgment. The supervisor is only there to clarify any questions on the rules. The supervisor is never going to overrule the umpire's judgment on a judgment call even if the call was bad. The perception that supervisors are "useless" is only because players continually call the supervisor over decisions that they can't do anything about.
@@jarrettpeeples9745aka…they stick together even if they know it’s the wrong call, just so they can keep their power trip going. Sounds about right
Supervisors are useless, never in the history of tennis have I ever seen them overturn a ruling
captaintang1 Blaz Rola against Crepette this year. Supervisor took away a point that the umpire was giving
So true lmao
@@faamey I have no idea who those people are, in the big matches it seems to never happen though
@@Andrew-hf1dj cibulkova vs hsieh wimbledon 2018
I only started watching Tennis now and this really is ridiculous
Siegemund is straight up lying! Christ, that is the most obvious challenge I may have ever seen. No player would take their hand off their stick like that
she didn't stop playing at all and the umpire clearly says before the match that you can challenge only by clearly saying it out loud to the umpire.
@@tendrugimichal If that isn't a challenge then it definitely counts as a distraction for the other player and should be the end of the point anyway.
“Can we play please? She already made a decision”
Someone play this back to Goerges when a chair umpire makes a decision against her
Derrick Lee she does have a point like the umpire won’t change her decision . No point complain
Can't agree more
@@101poumi no she fucking doesn't. The only decent thing she could do is to give the point to her opponent in good sportsmanship but that is lost these days. If the opposing player wants the supervisor the rules state he/she must have him/her. The nerve... to come and say "play" on when you know you've won an undeserving decision.
@@xandrunull fuck, never thought yo read an accurate answer like this.
Hercog was ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. Call came VERY late. That is sh***y umpiring and should be HIGHLIGHTED!! It comes down to common sense, not dealing with a gray area of mili seconds of timing. Goerges was wrong here, she didn't have any arguments about her side of the story ! She didn't have a say in it!
Yup. Goerges played the ball before the call came and she hit it out. It getting challenged late because the umpire called it late is stupid umpiring. It should of never been replayed, it was 100% Hercog's point.
Not only that. The decisión was made, let's continue said Georges... I want to see her if that happens to her
These videos are never long enough.
So well done, TA. The subtitles, the editing, the graphics, explanation sometimes to give more context. Love this channel and thanking the creator whole 💓 heartedly.
That speech by the coach has me ready to run through a wall
Damn that Darren Cahill pep talk to Simona was 🔥
Did she play better after that?
jochooi I’m too lazy to go google research that Martch score 😂😂😂
@@HCaulfield115 Pliskova won 6-4.
No she keep being a disgrace and lost the match
13:25 I need him every day nearly around 6 oclock.
I hope someone does the same to Georges one day ... “Can we play please? She already made a decision” while she damn know it was a late call and her ball was far out ...
yes if polona can't challenge the ball, then goerges should challenge her own ball and if it's in, then replay, if it's out it's point to hercog. Players need to appeal to their opponent as the umpires and supervisors are too pig headed and weak to change any previous decision made
Hercog was so right though.
what supervisor do: listen to what to umpire said, repeat to the player
Exactly. As others have duly noted, supervisors are a waste of time
cahill: bla bla bla bla
halep: -_-
cahill: BLA BLA BLA BLA!!!
halep: --__--
skatershoesfun he’s a horrible coach for saying such negative stuff during the match
lmfaoo
@@p.a.a3059 u think that's negative? lol listen carefully and you will see how brilliant what he said is. he pointed out mistakes and he points out what she needs to do to win, then he said he believes she can win this 1 point at the time... good coach don't just inflate their players ego, they point out what needs to improve to win. if i wanted cheerleaders i would hire one not a coach
I agree. He’s saying it how it is. What is sugar costing this situation going to do for his player? Nothing. He’s trying to reel her back in to get her to see the way she’s going isn’t right.
Vincent Tran u got a Point but in this situation it’s better to motivate the player, warm her of things the opponent did different or better, tell her what to focus on and give her examples of what to do next and how to change it. It doesn’t matter what happened before because it’s over anyway and u can’t change it. He should be more positive and tell her what to do and not what she did wrong.
Usually you appreciate Darren Cahill commentating alongside Fowler or Courier or one of the McEnroes, but seeing him coaching Halep and trying to motivate her shows a different side of him
Those videos are so incredibly well done, keep up the excellent work
4:16 Gasparyan says "shut up, otherwise they will fine me" :D
2 videos without Nick Kyrgios.
Ivars but you have fognini
Good
He is really a dickhead. He argues the way a dickhead kid does. Keeps asking a question that he wants to hear the umpire answer that has little relevance to his point. He’s the biggest tosser of any sport
That umpire in the Polona Hercog match is absolutely ridiculous ! Also , I’m glad Polona won the point that she shouldn’t have replayed in the first place.
Ostapenko is literally crazy 😂😂😂
Hercog was right against Gorges, it should’ve been her point
I'm wondering why players keep asking for the supervisor when a decision is already made.
I've never ever seen a supervisor change a decision of the chair umpire.So whats the point of calling for the sv? :)
wasting time and calming them emotions down :D
Besides attempting to throw the other player of their rhythm? Nothing. Maybe they needed a break.
Sergio Gonzales I have seen some overrules by the supervisor at the Challenger tour. But yes, happens rarely
Radwańska - Barthel : ruclips.net/video/cMnS9qV7C8I/видео.html
@@bialko1313 Thank you for the link.Different situation.Radwanska called for the supervisor,but he didn't come to the court.The players and the umpire clarified the situation amongst themselves before he could interfere.
On the other hand i'm very curious what the supervisor would have done if the umpire still wasn't aware of her mistake after all the discussion.
I think if he didn't watch the match,he wouldn't have changed the umpire's decision.
It's crazy how dependent halep became on cahill at shenzhen. He came on like 300 times
Awesome 😍
Will you do the same for the 2020 season? Australian Open is just a month away and I am already looking forward to see all the drama going on there lol 😄
I forgot how mouthy Ostapenko was 😂
You mean rude and condescending.
Ostapenko is fat!!!!!!😂😂
Lostapenko
@@alancosta4760 🤣🤣🤣💀💀💀
@@jesusrios3327 😂😂😂
Ostapenko: so kind and beautiful
The Sun: so square and green
So far as im aware, never in the history of tennis has "calling for the supervisor" resulted in a change of a decision
Once, hsieh su weih at Wimbledon. Check out the bonus Wimbledon drama video he just posted
10:40 She's completely correct here. The point should not have been replayed. The call was late and therefore did not influence the shot. And since the shot was out, the challenge should have resulted in a point, not a replay.
Back to back two videos? Christmas has arrived earlier than expected 😊❤
Damn 2 videos in an hour. 👍
Love Darren. He’s a great coach
Love it. Please grow. You are the only reason I go to RUclips
11:17 that "cmon" tho xD LUL
tennis player: misses a shot.
their racket: "I'm in danger".
Haha ostapenko is so funny. And her "mean face" before she serves is cute
Ostapenko is simpatic and funny even when she had a fight with umpire.
"Can you see the ball".😂😂😂
Not funny. Just stupid.
I feel sorry for Hercog. I don't know why the supervisor didn't even try to look at the reply.
God damn that pink court around 13:00 looks like it's been cheaply CG'd in lol
someone highlighted the court and forgot to deselect it
Congratulations for the amazing effort. Excellent series of videos
6:50 If the ball is hit believing the previous shot is in and there is no call before playing that shot, then that shot is called out and challenged. The umpire must watch the return shot, or trust the line call of the return shot. The line call of the return shot was out and the ball was over 1 metre out, yet the umpire still decided to ignore the line call and make the wrong decision. Why is there not a recording with an overall view to look at to back up these type of line calls. After all it is televised, so couldn't someone have asked the commentators what happened. Should umpires be accountable for their bad decisions and fined or removed.
The umpire was just making up the rules as they went along. They basically admitted they weren't sure and were just going with their gut instinct. In a case where the umpire makes a judgment call but isn't sure, if another official (linesperson) says they are sure that the ball was definitely out, the umpire should then overturn their ruling. The referee should have been aware of this too. Upon hearing that a linesperson had told Hercog that they were sure the ball had gone out, the referee should have said to the umpire "are you sure that it landed in". If the umpire says yes, then call stands (regardless of the fact the umpire is wrong). But if the umpire says no, then overturn and give Hercog the point because another official was sure. This is all in the rules, which an umpire and referee should both know. I think they should be fined in this instance - it's not just a bad decision, they didn't follow the official rules.
With that many eyes on the court, how something happens that not even 1 judge sees occur is beyond me.
Polona was right about the line call and NOT replaying the point. That umpire was hating !
I need more of these videos! So addicting watching drama :DDDD
If the line Umpire said Georges' ball was out, then Hercog should have been awarded the point. The call was well after Georges made contact with the ball. So if Georges' ball was out, Hercog should have been awarded the point.
Siniakova is always in these videos lol
She’s a whiner
Awesome pep talk from Killer Cahill, that is how you coach!
It was if she won, did she win?
Bonaventure knew her previous shot was out and yet didnt say anything until she could use it as an argument against the umpire when she got a dodgy call against herself
Opponent:
Everybody:
Hercog: *Smashes racquet*
Hercog had a perfect opportunity to tell “ball don’t lie” there
08:40 some umpires are just way too stubborn to admit they made a wrong call. Hate that, Hercog should've been given the point for sure.
why did youtube delete the part 3?
RUclips: ☻☻
How Ironic that Bad Blood was playing in the background when Darren Cahill was giving his pep talk to Simona. Plus the court turned red too 🤣
I don't understand 1:50 because the line judge clearly says it's in.
Thanks for the uploads
I don't know anything about tennis but I like watching it and watching these.
Maaannn 6:53 the single latest call I have ever seen. The ball had almost bounced on the opposite baseline by the time the call came
Great as always
The umpires egos will never let them admit being wrong.
I am in this video for 2 minutes without reading anything in the description and I expect some Ostapenko drama as usual.
Racket abuse, ball abuse xD
Tennis: Aight Imma head out.
Gasparyans ball literally made that brand new ball mark the millisecond it hit 😂
Electronic device calling the ball out instantly in the same way it makes a sound when the ball touches the net when serving and automatic update of the scores. Job done
Where has Christina McHale been all year? What was the result of the halep match? Did she pull it together or what?
Halep lost the match, 6-4 in the final set.
McHale is amazing
Her match against Serena was so cool. She can upset Martic in AO too!
All the pro's know the rules. It always makes me laugh when one of the pro's tries to get away with something their opponent is arguing with the umpire about (and is right). Georges saying it is the umpire's call against Hercog and that they should just play on - she could easily just put her hands up and say "yeah I missed and it was a late call so take the point"
This is not about the rules. In tennis, you have to think for yourself AND ONLY FOR YOURSELF. The goal is to win the match and yes sometimes in those cases, you have to shut up and run away from the drama. This might look ugly but this is the reality, specially in woman's tennis.
@@Diana-yp3mq BS
I don't even watch tennis but I love these
Will their be a 16th for 2019?
Fish The Fish no, but 2020!!
did the halep pep talk work?
I've seen several videos where the supervisor was called to question a call from the person in the chair. After all of them, I do have to ask... why bother? All of them, with no exception, they are there to listen to just one person, and then agree with what it is said. And, with no exception as well, to tell the player that their appeal was denied. With the shittiest excuses. The "at this time, we are going with this decision". It's at all times. They should rename that person role to "umpire validator", because that's all they do. No point whatsoever in calling them.
Goerges and Hercog has teamed up once and won WTA tournament in Seoul back in 2009 or 2010. CMIIW please
Anyone know that outro song?
are players required to cover up tattoos for tournaments in china?
Quick question in hard courts are you allowed to challenge officially for a mark even without Hawkeye
We are able to put rovers ad helicopters on Mars, but the issue of missed calls still exists. Yes, hawkeye is a solution although not perfect, but not used on gravel. I wonder if it is possible to have pressure sensitive courts...
The chair umpires egos prevent them from ever admitting they are wrong.
15:05 комментатор категорически не прав. Все было ровно наоборот.
Not only the supervisors never change referees decisions but everytime they have to listen the whole story of what happened. Like you are the supervisor of a tennis tournament and you are not watching the games?
I just fairly miss Benoit and Nick, which disappeared in last 3 continuing dramas.
The should implement the umpire working with the line judges more to ensure a right call. The umpire only has two eyes and calling a meeting with all the judges can ensure better accuracy like what they do in basketball
I have never seen a single instance where the supervisor came n made any difference to the conflict .. it stays the same apart from lots of time gone waste
Did Halep end up winning or losing that match ???
What is the point of the Supervisor if every time they say we have to go with the Umpire decision. I've never seen a supervisor overrule the umpire.
can we have a moment of silence for all the innocent racquets out there that have had their life taken way too early cuz of the racquet abuse by their owners 😔
Part 14?
I'm really not sure why they have tournament supervisors. it is basically like having a second umpire. the supervisor pretty much always goes with the umpire
part 16 pls love you
Wow, look at how empty the seats are. It's no wonder though, when the players keep complaining every 2 minutes.
Love the slo-mo of Hercog - she is ripped!
I love how these videos are nearly always comprised of the same 3 or 4 usual suspects on the WTA tour. :)
в последнем эпизоде, какая нахера Алена если ее звать Елена.. и что за идиотизм "судья абсолютно не прав" если он крикнул аут одновременно с ее ударом это трактуется как отсутствие помехи. комментатор мало того что имени теннисистки русско говорящей не знает называя ее совершенно другим, так еще и разжигает ненависть к судье не верное трактуя эпизод. это при том что у него перед глазами куча информации в том числе доступ к просмотру повторов в любых скоростях. идиот какой-то. как звать его кто знает?
так его и звать "Идиот", было четко видно как линейный говорит аут после того как Елена отбила мяч, а этот неуч комментатор винит судью в этом))
These videos make me wanna be a racket maker. An umpire not quite as much.
My favorite complainers are the italian and french players. So much fire and soooo entertaining :D
10:20 what i don't understand about this game, these are professional matches and there is tv coverage. Umpires are only human so they can make mistakes, but they seem to be like little hitlers who will not accept anyone elses opinion over their own. Replay the recording to show the position of the ball and then decide.
15:20 К счастью Остапенко быстро отходит в таких моментах и держит концентрацию..
these videos make me think Paire and Kyrgios must be from Eastern European descent along the maternal line.
Extremely underrated comment
On the gasparyan video, the ball LITERALLY left a mark way wide(idek how but it did) so that really wasn't fair
Ostapenko 😍😍😍
Putting players that are smashing their rackets on a drama video is more dramatic to me lol
Hercog was clearly right and Goerges, u failed.
Rules failed, not Julia. Polona should be able to challenge twice.
@@Indlvarn Unfortunately Julia failed in sportsmanship.
@@ohmygoodlord
I don't see it. She wasn't a chair umpire in this match. Polona would do the same in her situation.
@@Indlvarn There are dozens of examples of conflicts between umpire and players. Do you see any other players interfere in the conflict against their opponents? I didnt like Julia's behaviour.