I saw 170 to 200 milliamps in and from 60 to 100 milliamps out. I do appreciate how you keep you mouth shut and make zero claims about the results, then let us misread and interpolate on our own to demonstrate our ignorance. it was refreshing and after reading some of the comments... I get it.
It is impossible for us to check your efficiency on this device without a voltage reading on the drive motor side. This "experiment" doesn't test anything. All it shows is that current is flowing from one battery to the drive motor, and that more current is flowing into the second battery than out of the first one. Sure I could assume 12 or 13.8V and get an over unity result, but something tells me it's more likely your experimental setup is flawed or rigged.
The proof of the pudding is when the output is directed to the input and when or if the RPM maintains or increases. This is never done and there is only one reason why; because it doesn't work.
Make it run without the help of an electric battery. Rather replace the battery with a large, fast charging capacitor. Then ff that runs for weeks on end... then you really have something exceptional here. I don't expect an answer as I noticed you don't generally reply back to others. Nice build by the way. Cheers!
This is genius my friend I had this idea not long ago, and then I saw yours by accident great minds think alike, keep me updated on your project, do you have a link?
@@enriquesalgadoaceves9017 - Sorry, only now seeing your request for a link. Much has changed in 5 years. Hopefully you have not walked away from your channel for good as you have a lot a great ideas on your channel. 👉🏻 ruclips.net/video/8EYxKWsVx2k/видео.html
I noticed this is the one video about perpetual motion magnet motor without comments so... here goes - I'm not debunking it but the one magnet is recharging the other and it creates a self contained system. Makes sense in theory. The magnets produce more power to keep the system going... Question is... how well does it do when putting it to use? What if I hooked up a 60 W light bulb? would it drain too much power to keep the system afloat?
So, you are making .2 watts overunity. That much I can calculate and by the way , you did a great job creating this simple overunity motor. Some people may say, it is impossible, or the meters are wrong. They could go shit in their hat because you clearly provide the evidence here right in front of their eyes with zero trickery. The magnets on the end of the motor make this device so efficient that it is in an overefficiency state and it does not draw from another place or realm, you just hit the nail on the head and have created an over efficiency that it truly working. It's a great start and I have no problems sharing this video to the skeptics because all they can do is try to trash it when it is showing very real results. voltage in the beginning, feeding the motor is 12 volts dc times .100 volts = 1.2 watts. The output is showing 1.5 watts, I am coming up with 15.58 volts when paused, and, .09 amps which equals 1.4022 watts giving you an over 100% efficiency and an overunity of .2022 watts. It's not a lot, but., a hell of a lot better than any ordinary motor and, it is making energy, probably enough to self loop and call this a perpetual motion machine that has an added output of .2 watts, however, once the output battery is connected to the input, is it still a functional device? Please let me know, I am very interested and would love to see this in person, as well, test it. It is the first I have seen made from start to finish on youtube and I think it is fantastic.
Pretty typical "free energy" contraption with half the data measured and the rest presumed magic. Actually measure the voltage/amperage on both sides with the same instruments that are close to what your figures are, hooking up a 100A meter to measure miliamps will give you really wild readings.
General remark: As any motor turns, much energy (or even most of it) remains in the coils as they switch off. Most motors or motor controllers return this coil energy to the power supply via diodes. Bedini's 'returns' it to another battery.
you need to run it with 4 identical multimeters - cheap digital meters so you can simultaneously show volts and amps on the "in" side and volts and amps on the 'out' side. what is the orientation of the magnets? can you give pan details so that I we) can can build any verify results?
as you see ,when you connect load to out put, input current will go up. first it shows good amp, but when you use energy of it, you should feed more current to it.
IMPORTANT: Try this out. I once had seen a paper that had information on how to build a FREE ENERGY/MOTOR GENERATOR. The motor/generator once started would keep running and you would get Free Over Unity Electrical Energy .The person had used Permanent Magnets and Electro Magnets with High Voltage Capacitors. With electro magnets and capacitors you can have a controlled magnetic field that stops the moment the capacitor is drained of its energy. With an all permanent magnet system you need to physically move one of the magnets away from the other or you get a clogging effect where motion of the rotor stops. By using electro magnets and capacitors or super capacitors you can have a controlled intermittent magnetic field. You can control the magnetic field with by an optical switch or better still with a solid state Hall Effect Sensor Switch. The electro magnet can be used as a generator to recharge the capacitor. You may need a diode to ensure the capacitors get the proper charging polarity. By switching a magnetic field on and off you can stop the clogging effect therefore the rotor can keep on turning and keep gaining momentum. I Reply
Hey George. I hope all is well with you. If you still have this, can you add 2 more air coil sets to the top and bottom. And maybe turn the outside magnets 90 degrees, remove half and run with small pulse coil.
Nice work , I prefer if you use the same instruments in both input and output such a digital wattmeter you have here to avoid the error in analog instruments , also you need to do some improves on the motor stand , but you did impressive job realy, good luck.
The idea is that the magnets need to be spinning forever if you want power without wasting reasources, essentially an axle would work, but friction would wear it down. The use of a magnetic axle (an idea I had) would let it spin infinitely with the side effect of a large and powerful magnetic feild. But there is energy generated. Tell me what you think.
I enjoyed watching the build. I like to see experiments. But the two meters do NOT show that there is more ENERGY from the generator than there is coming off the battery. Neither instrument used actually measures energy (which is complicated by the wave form of the electricity generated. It would be REALLY easy to show that more energy was being produced than used, simply connect the output to the input. (or you could get the proper equipment to measure energy for a meaningful comparison between the direct current from the battery and the alternating current from the generator.
Do all you free energy guys use the same script? 1. No talking. 2. show building the device (USE MAGNETS, the more the merrier) 3. Whatever you build make sure its spins. 4. Use a volt meter, it makes you look like a scientist! 5. Don't show your face, unless you want to be mocked. Bonus : Thumbs up at the end.
They don't talk while they're thinking, and they don't like to give away their Billion Dollar free energy secrets... shhhhhh ! Einstein divorced His Wife, cuz He couldn't think with a Woman around.
lol its the lack of information these stupid channels have, hidden motors that make the spinning and cant forget that its always an indian or pakistani which make it more suspicious since 99% of scammers are from those countries
I want to see how real is this. So, I build it. If not, I invest some dollars and I had a cheap lesson. Maybe it's just a waste of time and money. When it's ready, I will share the video.
From the three output wirings coming from this permanent magnet generator, how do you connect to suitable electronic circuit to drive the load from batteries? Do we use a bridge rectifying circuit? I am a little confused here as there are three ends, is it three phase? If so how do you go about?
Interesting project but I would not trust a 100A hobby watt-meter to measure miliamps. They are good for large loads (5-50A) with +/- 0.5A accuracy but not for what you are trying to measure. I have a feeling you know that already by now.
Good job on the assembly, but,.I'm not sure if you are trying to proof over unity? Meaning having amp draw from right and generate 25% more at output left? If you are I recommend using same type of meter device on both sides so the reading is more realistic :) right side seems to show rms where left is peek to peek alternating fluctuating charge current =). ...in any case nice assembly!
Why don't you have a watt meter on both sides? Showing a mA meter doesn't tell us much - wattage is the measure of total energy being transferred, so you need to be measuring wattage on both the charging and discharging side to see whether you're getting a net energy gain.
This is in much cars.It is a in german "induction geber" an a part of the spark system.It hangs near the camshift an gives a low signal to the car by itsself....
Hi George, Excelent build & vid. This is genius!!I it is the answer to zero cost energy lights across the world. i see your demo shows a ~100mA input to ~200mA output . So why not have a self-charging closed loop system using one battery for input & output? So you have 100mA charging the battery as well as 100mA driving the generator rotor. or Do you have any vidoes of this set up powering a light bulb or LED's where again you can have 100mA driving the rotor motor and 100mA driving the LED's therefore permanent lights ? it may have to be hand cranked to start with but once spinning up you then switch on the LED's.
why did you use two batteries when you could have used one and show that the voltage was increasing to prove it works? or is it because you tampered with the analog shunt so it actually gives a false amperage reading making it look like it was producing more than it was consuming?
Ronnie Hutchins I think he used two to decrease the impedance and make his point of one battery used for magnetic field starter and another as power collector from the generator
By using an analog current meter on the motor side he can give a false current reading vs. to the digital one he was using. By changing the shunt inside the analog meter you can change the actual reading of the current and give a positive or a negative influence to your current readings.
Nice build... are you only using 1 of the pickup coils as output through the diodes & capacitor? I'll 'second' the suggestion to try to self-loop it... charge a large capacitor with the output, then connect it to the input... that is the real test... hope it works!
So if you'd geared the motor to the rotor or used a belt drive, it would have increased the efficiency of the power in to the power out, but you haven't shown that the overall efficiency is 100% or more. So it's just another alternator with a magnetic coupling.
0.1 amp is the same thing as 100ma I don't see any extra going on here.the slight variations are most likely the result of two different meters with different tolerances.
64kg, or 141 pounds of Uranium 235 was used for the Hiroshima A-bomb. I'd call that free energy - only 141 pounds gave out all that energy. Very close to 'free energy'. How? Okay let's say you take a 141 pound rock and drop it on Hiroshima. What happens? "Is that all ya got?" (in Japanese). What happens to the rock when it hits the ground? Few ants die, maybe a roach, rock might break into a couple smaller pieces. Free energy is available, the problem is the only way we know how to get it is -- a very chaotic, destructive method. An "all-or-nothing" technique. "Here's a 141 lbs rock of U235. Now, I can either drop this rock onto Hiroshima or I can convert all the mass of this rock into energy." "Free energy?" "Yep." "Okay let's go with the free energy approach. Any advice?" "Yeah, I'll do the calculations then give you the "minimum safe distance." Once we find out how to *very incrementally* tap into matter and convert it to energy (recall E = mc^2), free energy will be like a bag of Oreos from 7-11 "you need free energy?" "yeah" "Okay I'll grab a box from 7-11" Here you have two relatively large (for the size of the experiment) batteries. If you knew the math behind calculating the effect of adding a load (the 2nd battery) has on your homemade generator you'd instantly be able to assess 1) why, how much, the rotor slowed 2) why the meter values changed Here's a start. You do not have free energy there. How do we know. No signs of radiation, that's how. Plus someone's still there after the "free energy" is released in your setup. Folks in Hiroshima sorta vanished. ruclips.net/video/ASnDSEeWADk/видео.html . . . .
Congratulations on still having all your fingers. If I saw someone in my shop doing what you are doing with those cutting tools, I'd make damn sure my insurance was all paid up. I'll bet you aren't even wearing safety glasses. But it's nice to see that you have all the necessary requirements for your Free Energy Magnet Motor demonstration: colored clipleads, cheap meters not appropriate for the task at hand, and... a Big Battery.
NO REMORSE An unshielded bandsaw blade binding in polycarbonate and breaking.... an unsecured piece of plastic spinning in your hands and cutting an artery... chips in the eyes... etc etc. You always keep body parts out of the path of tools and moving parts, and you always use clamps to secure stuff when drilling, not your hands. Using spade woodboring bits to spotface or countersink, instead of proper Forstner bits: fail. Even if you are born in the late 1990s. That's how you get to be old, with ten fingers and two eyes. Go ahead and do what you like, but I'd never let you use my tools. Don't forget that you are setting an example for people who don't know any better. Plastic shards no threat to eyes.... I laugh at you. Wear safety glasses or someday you might not be so lucky.
LOL, Believe it or not. His use of tools exhibits a true craftsman. He can do these things without loosing a finger or an eye because of a talent you'll never know. Obviously he's been doing things this way all his life. Did You notice how concentric his rotor was ? Most people couldn't do that no matter what they use. Believe me, He's got good eye for what's gonna happen with those tools. No an arbitrary fear of tools and confidence in his skills and understanding of how tools operate. Just cuz it could happen doesn't mean it will. The reason you don't get killed crossing the street is because you look both ways, instinctively and Never give it another thought. You obviously use tools like a squirl crosses the street. ?? He did great and a lot faster than a safety fanatic. :)
I wonder if one could take a fan design or washing machine and just reconstitute it to do something similar plus with copper rings already within it just go off that
Why wouldn't you just run a light weight rubber band as a belt off your main axle to the arm holding the three little round magnets (I,m guessing) instead of the smaller motor. There would be bugger all drag and less to configure. Just start the wheel by hand and hey presto it seems.
Its really sad that people have such opinion they totally miss the point of the video. seems people cant wait to point out how there better than you and what your doing and just bitch about everything. I think it was a great demonstration and really enjoyed the effort . Its people like you that make huge breakthroughs in technology. its to bad people dont understand that. anyway,.. again great video.
I saw a video of a V gate motor that a to lift the magnet at the dead spot and then I remembered a design I had where I ran 2 V gates next to each isolenoidn opposite directions and then it dawned on me the reason for the husedorizontal magnet is because it pulls the V along trying to reach the end of the polls and the reason it stops is because the outer magnets of the V gate have reached the end so the center can't repeat. Then I thought 2 rotors next to each other. One with a V gate and the other having horizontal magnets all around the outside except for one space that would be timed with the dead space on the V gate which would have the same effect as lifting the magnet without any added force or loss of inertia.
Why not use two of the same type of meters? For example two ammeters. or two Watt Meters. Showing us different gauges with different readings doesn't help much.
I cannot pay attention with all the links in the middle of the video. Try posting those links at the end of the video after the main action is complete.
not sure I get it 1amp x12v =12wats and the other meter reads about the same? under the charging load 11.52 watts, a loss of a .5 watt. fun project though looks pretty.
What do you mean 1amp? The right meter has a max of 300mA (300 milli Amp = 0.3amp). After the device started up and the amp meter dropped it showed 80mA which is (assuming both batteries are 12V) 12 x 0.8 = 0.96watt, not 11.52watt...
You could improve output by using a better designed coil. You are only generating power on 50% of your coil. Electricity is generated when the wire is perpendicular to the moving magnetic field - parallel wires produce no electric power.
Mr Chaniotakis. Thankyou for demonstrating overunity. You put 12V, 100mA in... you get 15.5V, 120 mA out. Am I missing something or are 75% of the people leaving comments here working for the oil or nuclear industry?? This IS "overunity" is it not?
You are missing a set of internal magnets my friend. Rule of square = start with your first measurement, each and every measurement must the be X² of the starting number or divisible by it. Example, outer ring.... A clock = 24/360 = 15° for each magnet placement. Inner ring must match EXACTLY the same..... This means the outer magnets will be bigger than the internal. Example of magnet sizes= started with 24, so an easy magnet size to start would be..... Outer ring 8mm x 3mm = 24. Inner ring 6 x 4 = 24.... Roller using the same math, 3mm diametrically charged magnet, 7mm(4mm wall) dielectric and a 1mm outer copper ring = 8mm... Fits into 24..... 12 rollers.... Space between outer and inner ring using all measurements above...... 4mm of space needed to prevent friction (2mm either side), 8mm roller + 4mm gap = 12mm gap.... 24.
Well done! You are getting 1.5W (from watt meter) out from 6W (.5A x 12V) input! This is not a very efficient machine.... But if you want to believe that it is overunity, then go right ahead!.
Hi George, i know how much you work in this project, i am a curious man and i would like to know if your engine have torque with resistive loads or the rotor stop...! saludos.
Thanks for your comment. "HOLA" Or inductive load.... Or resistive load... I have reduced torque of the rotor ... but there's a little secret in one of the two loads. I hope 2015 if God wants me to start the generator with my hand. Hitherto attributed to very specific points input voltage by combining specific rotation points of the generator..."SALUDOS"
FuckYouGooglePlus How much the government pays you to discredit alternative energy projects? If this is not the case, please bring more complete arguments.
Zeitgeist Québec So very sad. The absolute mantra of the ignorant. Anyone who knows science must be a paid shill whose job it is to keep secrets from you. I understand. Your life is such a failure in every way. No job. o woman. No friends. No one who cares about you at all. And you refuse to accept responsibility for your failures. So you have to come up with some theory about big evil men that conspire to keep you down. I guess that makes it easier to stave off suicide one more day? Using your pathetic logic, the governments "secret protector" budget must be in the TRILLIONS, considering not one single scientists agrees with you. I guess there are literally hundreds of thousands of scientists. physicists, engineers, etc. all getting paid by the government. And we get paid so much mone ythat we are actually able to somehow REALLY manipulate reality to make what we say true...seeing as how not ONE single fucking idiot like you have EVER demonstrated your inventions in front of anyone or allowed anyone to examine it completely. My god you are worthless.
FuckYouGooglePlus I'm glad that someone besides me can see this nonsense for what it is. These people do a real disservice to honest and careful investigators with their paranoid conspiracy theories and their bad techniques and even worse knowledge of electronics. Even misguided research should at least be performed competently. All we are seeing here is an illustration of how _not_ to proceed with making parts and demonstrating an effect.
Just place magnets in a circle mounted around something that it can spin on. then have a counter magnet placed to push the rotation motion to generate electricity.
Because he doesn't misure the real energy, but only current missing the voltage. We need two Wattmeter in the input and output and after a while invert them so he will really proof that the machine produce more energy that consume. He know this...
Nice looking prototype, but the watt meter used to measure output power is a poor choice for meaningful measurement at this level. The watt meter used here can be bought on ebay for $10 and is not specified as a true RMS measurement device and is at best 10% accurate using pure DC at this power level. On the input side, without placing a large electrolytic capacitor directly across the driving motor we cannot rely on the ammeter reading. In fact, the driving motor may be consuming far more current than the ammeter indicates. At least add a 100 to 470uf cap across the motor leads and rerun your test.
Ampere are not energy... At output you have Watt=Volt x Ampere (11.07 X 0.18) at input Watt=(?? X 0.100) so? You should use 2 identical analog Wattmeter and invert after a while. Why no one proof correctly??
+Iky piky The same idea struck me, however, the 12V Lead Acid Battery is unlikely to be outputting more than 14.2V when freshly charged, so the numbers would still indicate over unity. Clearly, this is nonsense or he would show the second battery connected to the first, producing a perpetual motion machine .
Why does this power meter showing current and power when the load side is not connected? When you have open circuit your current is 0A. Another value is not possible, you can measure voltage but never current.
+El Blog de JoseLu90 Without a Load connected to the "Watt Meter", it's apparently displaying the amount of power required to operate the meter itself.
mate just a question. The generator you made produces AC voltage weform isn't it? Then why do you connect it to a battery which is DC without a rectifier made of diodes. You cannot trust the meter doing so. Buy an oscilloscope and you will see. I cannot say we can't do overunity, but your PMSG motor will never produces more than the DC one. We will find a way don't worry, keep on !
beforebefore Sorry mate couldn't see the diodes from here.... then try to put a resistor on the output instead of a battery, that would prob give you something slightly different. For me it's only using resonance phenomena (casimir effect and so on) that we can reach very high or even over unity yield. Keep us updated X
If I'm wrong, why don't you connect the output from the "generator" to the engine? Well, it won't work like that. OverUnity? No! On the right side you have direct current, that is, the milliammeter indicates the correct value. On the left is alternating current, straightened and partially smoothed with a capacitor, so we have a pulsating voltage measured with a wattmeter. It indicates exactly only the values of the constant and not pulsating current, it is very inaccurate. The error can be up to 30%. This is because a wattmeter would have to integrate the values of the power transmitted to the battery at a very high frequency (e.g. several thousand times per second), which this cheap meter does not do. So we can see here huge measurement errors and not free energy.
First law of thermodynamics - Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It can only change forms. In any process, the total energy of the universe remains the same. For a thermodynamic cycle the net heat supplied to the system equals the net work done by the system.
there are virtual particles popping in and out of existence all the time. When this happens, a particle and its antiparticle appear, and then they recombine and disappear again.When this takes place near an event horizon, strange things can happen. Instead of the two particles existing for a moment and then annihilating each other, one particle can fall into the black hole, and the other particle can fly off into space. Over vast periods of time, this trickle of escaping particles causes the black hole to evaporate. So, black holes do not destroy energy.
Joe Grodis Thanks for the reply. One more question; Do you know how the discovery of gravitational waves coincides with the theory of hawking radiation? Does the confirmation of Einsteins theory somehow invalidate Hawkings theory? One would think it does but I am not sure. What's your take on it?
I don't understand the point? You are using electricity to create electricity. And there is probably a power loss because perpetual energy or motion is impossible. It should be hooked up to a prop or a hydro turbine to convert kinetic energy to electrical.
well, we don't see the volts going in or the drop on the analog meter. let's assume (yea i know ass out of "u" and "me"). fully charged batt on right 13.99v drop a 0.11v for the meter under load 13.88vx0.11a = 1.5268 watts on the other side we see, from his watt meter (is it calibrated?) 11.09v @ 0.18a = 1.9962 watts (his showing 1.9 watts) however that is a snap shot in time. it was fluctuating. 11.08v @ 0.16 = 1.7728 watts (his showing 1.7 watts) at a low point 1.7/1.53 = 111%.to 1.9/1.93 = 124% on the high side. we see a magnetic coupling and not a physical coupling of the drive motor and a torque amplification to the generator :O could that be the secret? I have seen a couple of other magnetically coupled machines clamming overunity. and how about some detail on the coil / magnet config of the generator?
What is the use of using a battery to run the small motor to make the Dual Axial Flux Permanent-Magnet Motor to SPIN to charge the other battery??? It does NOT make sense
However, a lead acid battery has only a 50% efficiency (and li-ion 70-80%), so to really have efficiency between a driving and charging battery you need to make up for the 50% efficiency loss by at least double overunity (2x more output than input)
Sure, just saying... BTW... If we want to really convince everyone overunity is possible... If this video was done one step better it would, a) show the voltage of the driving battery, b) use the same measuring equipment on both sides, and swapped them to indicate similarities, c) rather run a load than charge a battery (but I guess this point does not really matter)... Just too many videos using the word 'overunity' but not convincing enough, especially the input vs output readings... Always something missing, in this case it is the driving battery volts, and non similar equipment....
sorry he is not claiming overunity though, he is asking: OverUnity is iT or Not ? I guess it is a question... I would guess yes it is overunity if you drive a load and follow the steps in my previous comment and still have more output than in. No, if you are taking in consideration the charging battery losing 50% efficiency...
I wonder? If ur motor runs .can it power a second and can the power from second motor have surplus power stored from being disconnect periodically and shut Down charge stored from the deceleration of second motor and returned to first motor. Just a thought thermodynamics is a clingy Mistress .but two motors are a work force so two to four and so forth power surplus extraction from a gear run system maybe more attainable just a thought I had like ur work very clean .keep it going .
Do you get more Elektricity then you need to run the magnetic motor ? I dont understand for what this is good for ! Wofür ist dieser Motor gut ? Bin nur ein Laie !
efharisto poli yorgo, awesome video,thanks for your work.Ask the people how many of them spend their time for preperation video and answer the questions.The name is not important you showed us awesome video and ı liked it so much.Thanks again.
If the system has more output than input, then two batteries are not needed. A single battery should never go dead. Make a video of this, with one battery, and only the input connected. Have an ammeter in line with the input, showing the current driving the system. Get the system running and connect output to the input. The ammeter should switch directions, showing the battery is charging, until it's fully charged.
🚨 IF THIS TRULY WORKED, THEN PLACING BATTERIES WITH IN THE CIRCUT WOULD NOT BE NEEDED. OTHERWISE THIS WILL EVENTUALLY COME TO A STOP. Additionally, this design has virtually no torque. That means no real useable load can be placed on this. IE: Run a house, etc.
Power is A*V = W thats right on the left side. (about 2W) On the right site you measure just A and you have a different scale. On the right site you have less Voltage ! This means you have less power
Houston, we have a problem! At Time Stamp 6:52, your Digital Watt Meter already displayed "0.10 Amps" BEFORE you even connected it to the Load! You did not "ZERO" your Digital Watt Meter when NO LOAD was connected. How can you get an accurate, trustworthy, meaningful amperage reading from your Digital Watt meter if reads 0.10 Amps with *nothing* connected?
Thanks for your comment ! Ι think that digital watt meter need a "power" to read... also i have and "big capacity capacitor" on the bridge rectifier...
***** I sincerely doubt that the "0.10 Amp" reading is the power needed to operate the Digital Watt Meter. It is very common that DC Amp Meters need to be "ZEROED" before using. And you did *not* perform that very important calibration step. Try using that Analog Meter first in the Motor Circuit and then move that Analog Meter to the Generator Circuit. You will see *LESS* power generated in the output circuit and *MORE* power consumed in motor circuit. Therefore, no over-unity ...
Do you share the specs somewhere of your build? what kinda magnets strenghts, coil wire and turns and disk diameter etc? I'm very interested in replicating this. thanks
I have built a few devices albeit not specifically for 'free energy' but interesting ones. these intrigue me and like an illusion I'm trying to figue out where the 'trick' is. One that I do want to replicate is the Steorn engine as the principles are simple to experiment with. This one I'd like to konw also. Maybe it's just a measurement issue. Anyway, anyone has the specs for this?
Here's how these devices work: Step 1 make fake free energy device video Step 2 monetize the video and get hundreds of thousands of views Step 3 use the money to pay your power bill
+Reddit Gold User i dont know but there are plenty of paid spammers out there to discredit the work of innovative minds trying to break free of the grid and as someone from redit you are a paid spammer or u are plain ignorent and if it is the latter then forshame
Collision Pending These devices are fake, they don't exist outside of youtube. What kind of world do you live in where you think a free energy device exists, but its inventor gets suppressed by a simple youtube comment? First you are ignoring the fact that overunity devices break the laws of physics, then you take it a step further by assuming these devices exist but some kind of conspiracy exists to suppress it. I could just imagine a corporate meeting "How do we stop this miracle technology? Let's pay some fat neckbeard to leave comments!" Give me a break. Why would they waste their money? The math to prove these work doesn't exist and that's enough to convince everyone who isn't allergic to a bit of research and basic education. Its even more absurd to leave ideas for improvements on the device when you yourself are only speculating on what you think is real.
+Reddit Gold User they are discredited across the internet think of it this way a coil is a magnet yes well if you spin a circle useing one coil the eight underneath are making power from the perma magnets that is eight times more power because only the one on the outside is using any power and if you owned the electric company would you want other people making power taking away their power over us
its a good idea , using a outside power to keep it in motion. in put to out kinda hard to keep up with , but power going in is less or equal to power coming out ,
Измерения сделаны неверно! Нельзя сравнивать ток, когда напряжение разное! Нужно мерять мощность! И как раз на выходе мощность в Ваттах будет меньшие чем на входе. Это потери на преобразовании. А поставь два таких одинаковых измерителя как на выходе. Нет тут чуда.
I originally didn't like your videos I didn't understand the meters! I had been reversed! I was thinking why is he showing that he's using to watts to run the motor and only generating 100 milliamps! LOL! I'm a little backwards sometimes there buddy! LOL! Great video
but you need electricity to run the electric motor that turns the magnets. so why not use that electricity directly to charge the battery, I'm sure the battery running the little electronic motor will run out of energy before it changes the other battery. so it's just a waste of energy.
Buying one helps my research tremendously, helping me get all the supplies I need for the future. Visit my store on ebay: www.ebay.com/usr/eleman-gc
Now that 3D printers are super cheap... building & experimenting w/overunity has never been easier or as inexpensive!
Awesome work
First channel I've seen that actually shows realistic output of these devices. Thank you
I saw 170 to 200 milliamps in and from 60 to 100 milliamps out.
I do appreciate how you keep you mouth shut and make zero claims about the results, then let us misread and interpolate on our own to demonstrate our ignorance.
it was refreshing and after reading some of the comments... I get it.
It is impossible for us to check your efficiency on this device without a voltage reading on the drive motor side. This "experiment" doesn't test anything. All it shows is that current is flowing from one battery to the drive motor, and that more current is flowing into the second battery than out of the first one. Sure I could assume 12 or 13.8V and get an over unity result, but something tells me it's more likely your experimental setup is flawed or rigged.
he doesn't claim it as free energy and he wont get nowhere near it with that design
The proof of the pudding is when the output is directed to the input and when or if the RPM maintains or increases. This is never done and there is only one reason why; because it doesn't work.
Make it run without the help of an electric battery. Rather replace the battery with a large, fast charging capacitor. Then ff that runs for weeks on end... then you really have something exceptional here. I don't expect an answer as I noticed you don't generally reply back to others.
Nice build by the way.
Cheers!
This is genius my friend I had this idea not long ago, and then I saw yours by accident great minds think alike, keep me updated on your project, do you have a link?
Might up the voltage but the watts won't change.
@@enriquesalgadoaceves9017 - Sorry, only now seeing your request for a link. Much has changed in 5 years. Hopefully you have not walked away from your channel for good as you have a lot a great ideas on your channel. 👉🏻 ruclips.net/video/8EYxKWsVx2k/видео.html
do the true test hook the wat meeter in line with the generator and motor then disconnect the batteries how long does it stay running
Now that 3D printers are super cheap... building & experimenting w/overunity has never been easier or as inexpensive!
I noticed this is the one video about perpetual motion magnet motor without comments so... here goes -
I'm not debunking it but the one magnet is recharging the other and it creates a self contained system. Makes sense in theory. The magnets produce more power to keep the system going... Question is... how well does it do when putting it to use? What if I hooked up a 60 W light bulb? would it drain too much power to keep the system afloat?
Liked the intro. Loved the device. Overunity rules 😝🤘
So, you are making .2 watts overunity. That much I can calculate and by the way , you did a great job creating this simple overunity motor. Some people may say, it is impossible, or the meters are wrong. They could go shit in their hat because you clearly provide the evidence here right in front of their eyes with zero trickery. The magnets on the end of the motor make this device so efficient that it is in an overefficiency state and it does not draw from another place or realm, you just hit the nail on the head and have created an over efficiency that it truly working. It's a great start and I have no problems sharing this video to the skeptics because all they can do is try to trash it when it is showing very real results. voltage in the beginning, feeding the motor is 12 volts dc times .100 volts = 1.2 watts. The output is showing 1.5 watts, I am coming up with 15.58 volts when paused, and, .09 amps which equals 1.4022 watts giving you an over 100% efficiency and an overunity of .2022 watts. It's not a lot, but., a hell of a lot better than any ordinary motor and, it is making energy, probably enough to self loop and call this a perpetual motion machine that has an added output of .2 watts, however, once the output battery is connected to the input, is it still a functional device? Please let me know, I am very interested and would love to see this in person, as well, test it. It is the first I have seen made from start to finish on youtube and I think it is fantastic.
It should work bc your not completing the circuit since the motor magnets do not touch the wheel at all. The 1st battery would just think it immortal.
Pretty typical "free energy" contraption with half the data measured and the rest presumed magic.
Actually measure the voltage/amperage on both sides with the same instruments that are close to what your figures are, hooking up a 100A meter to measure miliamps will give you really wild readings.
Its mA meter try next time
I caught every word of this video; so easy, thanks for sharing.
General remark: As any motor turns, much energy (or even most of it) remains in the coils as they switch off. Most motors or motor controllers return this coil energy to the power supply via diodes. Bedini's 'returns' it to another battery.
Świetna edukacyjna praca to jest inspirujące .. = polecam wszystkim zainteresowanym , generatorami i silnikami.
you need to run it with 4 identical multimeters - cheap digital meters so you can simultaneously show volts and amps on the "in" side and volts and amps on the 'out' side.
what is the orientation of the magnets? can you give pan details so that I we) can can build any verify results?
as you see ,when you connect load to out put, input current will go up. first it shows good amp, but when you use energy of it, you should feed more current to it.
IMPORTANT: Try this out. I once had seen a paper that had information on how to build a FREE ENERGY/MOTOR GENERATOR. The motor/generator once started would keep running and you would get Free Over Unity Electrical Energy .The person had used Permanent Magnets and Electro Magnets with High Voltage Capacitors. With electro magnets and capacitors you can have a controlled magnetic field that stops the moment the capacitor is drained of its energy. With an all permanent magnet system you need to physically move one of the magnets away from the other or you get a clogging effect where motion of the rotor stops. By using electro magnets and capacitors or super capacitors you can have a controlled intermittent magnetic field. You can control the magnetic field with by an optical switch or better still with a solid state Hall Effect Sensor Switch. The electro magnet can be used as a generator to recharge the capacitor. You may need a diode to ensure the capacitors get the proper charging polarity. By switching a magnetic field on and off you can stop the clogging effect therefore the rotor can keep on turning and keep gaining momentum. I
Reply
Hey George. I hope all is well with you. If you still have this, can you add 2 more air coil sets to the top and bottom. And maybe turn the outside magnets 90 degrees, remove half and run with small pulse coil.
Nice work , I prefer if you use the same instruments in both input and output such a digital wattmeter you have here to avoid the error in analog instruments , also you need to do some improves on the motor stand , but you did impressive job realy, good luck.
Thanks for your comment! Also see this ruclips.net/video/bN5I44XbQUE/видео.html
I really enjoyed this video Congratulations
The idea is that the magnets need to be spinning forever if you want power without wasting reasources, essentially an axle would work, but friction would wear it down. The use of a magnetic axle (an idea I had) would let it spin infinitely with the side effect of a large and powerful magnetic feild. But there is energy generated. Tell me what you think.
Clamping that saw in a vice was a great idea I can't believe I never thought of
I enjoyed watching the build. I like to see experiments. But the two meters do NOT show that there is more ENERGY from the generator than there is coming off the battery. Neither instrument used actually measures energy (which is complicated by the wave form of the electricity generated. It would be REALLY easy to show that more energy was being produced than used, simply connect the output to the input. (or you could get the proper equipment to measure energy for a meaningful comparison between the direct current from the battery and the alternating current from the generator.
May I suggest that you install capacitors to capture wasted emf energy and build a charge
help make suggestions on how to build tesla unipolar motor with me.
I did some experiments with capturing back emf as well. It is useful.
Can be fixed on scooter front wheel to make e bike?
Do all you free energy guys use the same script?
1. No talking.
2. show building the device (USE MAGNETS, the more the merrier)
3. Whatever you build make sure its spins.
4. Use a volt meter, it makes you look like a scientist!
5. Don't show your face, unless you want to be mocked.
Bonus : Thumbs up at the end.
They don't talk while they're thinking, and they don't like to give away their Billion Dollar free energy secrets... shhhhhh !
Einstein divorced His Wife, cuz He couldn't think with a Woman around.
lol its the lack of information these stupid channels have, hidden motors that make the spinning and cant forget that its always an indian or pakistani which make it more suspicious since 99% of scammers are from those countries
koolerpure
True..
I want to see how real is this. So, I build it. If not, I invest some dollars and I had a cheap lesson. Maybe it's just a waste of time and money. When it's ready, I will share the video.
Here's a tip. Instead of investing in YET ANOTHER FREE ENERGY SCAM, invest in a physics book.
From the three output wirings coming from this permanent magnet generator, how do you connect to suitable electronic circuit to drive the load from batteries? Do we use a bridge rectifying circuit? I am a little confused here as there are three ends, is it three phase? If so how do you go about?
A little suspicious just current meter on small motor...Which way is that power flowing? Is the battery charging or running the thing?
Interesting project but I would not trust a 100A hobby watt-meter to measure miliamps. They are good for large loads (5-50A) with +/- 0.5A accuracy but not for what you are trying to measure. I have a feeling you know that already by now.
Good job on the assembly, but,.I'm not sure if you are trying to proof over unity? Meaning having amp draw from right and generate 25% more at output left? If you are I recommend using same type of meter device on both sides so the reading is more realistic :) right side seems to show rms where left is peek to peek alternating fluctuating charge current =). ...in any case nice assembly!
Why don't you have a watt meter on both sides? Showing a mA meter doesn't tell us much - wattage is the measure of total energy being transferred, so you need to be measuring wattage on both the charging and discharging side to see whether you're getting a net energy gain.
This is in much cars.It is a in german "induction geber" an a part of the spark system.It hangs near the camshift an gives a low signal to the car by itsself....
Nice music. what is it?
😂🙂😉
Hi George, Excelent build & vid. This is genius!!I it is the answer to zero cost energy lights across the world. i see your demo shows a ~100mA input to ~200mA output . So why not have a self-charging closed loop system using one battery for input & output? So you have 100mA charging the battery as well as 100mA driving the generator rotor. or Do you have any vidoes of this set up powering a light bulb or LED's where again you can have 100mA driving the rotor motor and 100mA driving the LED's therefore permanent lights ? it may have to be hand cranked to start with but once spinning up you then switch on the LED's.
So the generated current is roughly half that of the supplied current.
why did you use two batteries when you could have used one and show that the voltage was increasing to prove it works? or is it because you tampered with the analog shunt so it actually gives a false amperage reading making it look like it was producing more than it was consuming?
Ronnie Hutchins I think he used two to decrease the impedance and make his point of one battery used for magnetic field starter and another as power collector from the generator
By using an analog current meter on the motor side he can give a false current reading vs. to the digital one he was using. By changing the shunt inside the analog meter you can change the actual reading of the current and give a positive or a negative influence to your current readings.
Ronnie Hutchins Did you notice that Georgee did not answer this one ?
Nice build... are you only using 1 of the pickup coils as output through the diodes & capacitor?
I'll 'second' the suggestion to try to self-loop it... charge a large capacitor with the output, then connect it to the input... that is the real test... hope it works!
So if you'd geared the motor to the rotor or used a belt drive, it would have increased the efficiency of the power in to the power out, but you haven't shown that the overall efficiency is 100% or more. So it's just another alternator with a magnetic coupling.
Why don't you connect directly the output with the motor? After a manual start he should increase or keep the rotation right?
I agree.
0.1 amp is the same thing as 100ma I don't see any extra going on here.the slight variations are most likely the result of two different meters with different tolerances.
64kg, or 141 pounds of Uranium 235 was used for the Hiroshima A-bomb.
I'd call that free energy - only 141 pounds gave out all that energy. Very close to 'free energy'. How? Okay let's say you take a 141 pound rock and drop it on Hiroshima. What happens? "Is that all ya got?" (in Japanese). What happens to the rock when it hits the ground? Few ants die, maybe a roach, rock might break into a couple smaller pieces.
Free energy is available, the problem is the only way we know how to get it is -- a very chaotic, destructive method. An "all-or-nothing" technique. "Here's a 141 lbs rock of U235. Now, I can either drop this rock onto Hiroshima or I can convert all the mass of this rock into energy."
"Free energy?"
"Yep."
"Okay let's go with the free energy approach. Any advice?"
"Yeah, I'll do the calculations then give you the "minimum safe distance."
Once we find out how to *very incrementally* tap into matter and convert it to energy (recall E = mc^2), free energy will be like a bag of Oreos from 7-11 "you need free energy?" "yeah" "Okay I'll grab a box from 7-11"
Here you have two relatively large (for the size of the experiment) batteries. If you knew the math behind calculating the effect of adding a load (the 2nd battery) has on your homemade generator you'd instantly be able to assess
1) why, how much, the rotor slowed
2) why the meter values changed
Here's a start. You do not have free energy there.
How do we know.
No signs of radiation, that's how. Plus someone's still there after the "free energy" is released in your setup.
Folks in Hiroshima sorta vanished.
ruclips.net/video/ASnDSEeWADk/видео.html
.
.
.
.
Congratulations on still having all your fingers. If I saw someone in my shop doing what you are doing with those cutting tools, I'd make damn sure my insurance was all paid up. I'll bet you aren't even wearing safety glasses.
But it's nice to see that you have all the necessary requirements for your Free Energy Magnet Motor demonstration: colored clipleads, cheap meters not appropriate for the task at hand, and... a Big Battery.
NO REMORSE THANKS FOR YOUR COMMENT! "Old School..."
...
NO REMORSE An unshielded bandsaw blade binding in polycarbonate and breaking.... an unsecured piece of plastic spinning in your hands and cutting an artery... chips in the eyes... etc etc. You always keep body parts out of the path of tools and moving parts, and you always use clamps to secure stuff when drilling, not your hands. Using spade woodboring bits to spotface or countersink, instead of proper Forstner bits: fail. Even if you are born in the late 1990s. That's how you get to be old, with ten fingers and two eyes. Go ahead and do what you like, but I'd never let you use my tools. Don't forget that you are setting an example for people who don't know any better. Plastic shards no threat to eyes.... I laugh at you. Wear safety glasses or someday you might not be so lucky.
LOL, Believe it or not. His use of tools exhibits a true craftsman. He can do these things without loosing a finger or an eye because of a talent you'll never know. Obviously he's been doing things this way all his life. Did You notice how concentric his rotor was ? Most people couldn't do that no matter what they use. Believe me, He's got good eye for what's gonna happen with those tools. No an arbitrary fear of tools and confidence in his skills and understanding of how tools operate. Just cuz it could happen doesn't mean it will. The reason you don't get killed crossing the street is because you look both ways, instinctively and Never give it another thought. You obviously use tools like a squirl crosses the street. ?? He did great and a lot faster than a safety fanatic. :)
Great Job! be Careful with the drilling though i know its not hard just be aware of whats going on. other than that i liked it alot
Someone is a jeolous fukface!
I wonder if one could take a fan design or washing machine and just reconstitute it to do something similar plus with copper rings already within it just go off that
Why wouldn't you just run a light weight rubber band as a belt off your main axle to the arm holding the three little round magnets (I,m guessing) instead of the smaller motor. There would be bugger all drag and less to configure. Just start the wheel by hand and hey presto it seems.
Awesome😎. I wish I was crafty like you!!!
Making a fake motor for a RUclips video isn't hard.
Its really sad that people have such opinion they totally miss the point of the video. seems people cant wait to point out how there better than you and what your doing and just bitch about everything. I think it was a great demonstration and really enjoyed the effort . Its people like you that make huge breakthroughs in technology. its to bad people dont understand that. anyway,.. again great video.
I saw a video of a V gate motor that a to lift the magnet at the dead spot and then I remembered a design I had where I ran 2 V gates next to each isolenoidn opposite directions and then it dawned on me the reason for the husedorizontal magnet is because it pulls the V along trying to reach the end of the polls and the reason it stops is because the outer magnets of the V gate have reached the end so the center can't repeat. Then I thought 2 rotors next to each other. One with a V gate and the other having horizontal magnets all around the outside except for one space that would be timed with the dead space on the V gate which would have the same effect as lifting the magnet without any added force or loss of inertia.
that and the one on the left is producing 15 volts 2 amps the one on the right 200ma independently of anything else. well done
Why not use two of the same type of meters? For example two ammeters. or two Watt Meters. Showing us different gauges with different readings doesn't help much.
cos it's all a scam...... you will never see actual power in vs actual power output
also this is not how you measure amps
I cannot pay attention with all the links in the middle of the video. Try posting those links at the end of the video after the main action is complete.
George did you try self looping back to run battery?? should work
Der Aufbau wäre interessant gewesen. Ihr zeigt meist nur das Resultat, doch nie wirklich, wie man das Ding auch baut.
What if you used a Stirling engine to rotate the magnets that turn the wheel? Would it be fast enough?
not sure I get it 1amp x12v =12wats and the other meter reads about the same? under the charging load 11.52 watts, a loss of a .5 watt. fun project though looks pretty.
What do you mean 1amp? The right meter has a max of 300mA (300 milli Amp = 0.3amp). After the device started up and the amp meter dropped it showed 80mA which is (assuming both batteries are 12V) 12 x 0.8 = 0.96watt, not 11.52watt...
Wheres da muzic from?
You could improve output by using a better designed coil. You are only generating power on 50% of your coil. Electricity is generated when the wire is perpendicular to the moving magnetic field - parallel wires produce no electric power.
Mr Chaniotakis. Thankyou for demonstrating overunity. You put 12V, 100mA in... you get 15.5V, 120 mA out. Am I missing something or are 75% of the people leaving comments here working for the oil or nuclear industry?? This IS "overunity" is it not?
its good to see that after ages the comment board is full of people with open eyes
You are missing a set of internal magnets my friend.
Rule of square = start with your first measurement, each and every measurement must the be X² of the starting number or divisible by it.
Example, outer ring.... A clock = 24/360 = 15° for each magnet placement. Inner ring must match EXACTLY the same..... This means the outer magnets will be bigger than the internal.
Example of magnet sizes= started with 24, so an easy magnet size to start would be..... Outer ring 8mm x 3mm = 24. Inner ring 6 x 4 = 24....
Roller using the same math, 3mm diametrically charged magnet, 7mm(4mm wall) dielectric and a 1mm outer copper ring = 8mm... Fits into 24..... 12 rollers....
Space between outer and inner ring using all measurements above......
4mm of space needed to prevent friction (2mm either side), 8mm roller + 4mm gap = 12mm gap.... 24.
Well done! You are getting 1.5W (from watt meter) out from 6W (.5A x 12V) input! This is not a very efficient machine.... But if you want to believe that it is overunity, then go right ahead!.
Hi George, i know how much you work in this project, i am a curious man and i would like to know if your engine have torque with resistive loads or the rotor stop...! saludos.
Thanks for your comment. "HOLA" Or inductive load.... Or resistive load... I have reduced torque of the rotor ... but there's a little secret in one of the two loads. I hope 2015 if God wants me to start the generator with my hand. Hitherto attributed to very specific points input voltage by combining specific rotation points of the generator..."SALUDOS"
Why do you want to know what would happen with this fake motor?
FuckYouGooglePlus
How much the government pays you to discredit alternative energy projects? If this is not the case, please bring more complete arguments.
Zeitgeist Québec
So very sad. The absolute mantra of the ignorant. Anyone who knows science must be a paid shill whose job it is to keep secrets from you.
I understand. Your life is such a failure in every way. No job. o woman. No friends. No one who cares about you at all. And you refuse to accept responsibility for your failures. So you have to come up with some theory about big evil men that conspire to keep you down. I guess that makes it easier to stave off suicide one more day?
Using your pathetic logic, the governments "secret protector" budget must be in the TRILLIONS, considering not one single scientists agrees with you. I guess there are literally hundreds of thousands of scientists. physicists, engineers, etc. all getting paid by the government. And we get paid so much mone ythat we are actually able to somehow REALLY manipulate reality to make what we say true...seeing as how not ONE single fucking idiot like you have EVER demonstrated your inventions in front of anyone or allowed anyone to examine it completely.
My god you are worthless.
FuckYouGooglePlus
I'm glad that someone besides me can see this nonsense for what it is. These people do a real disservice to honest and careful investigators with their paranoid conspiracy theories and their bad techniques and even worse knowledge of electronics. Even misguided research should at least be performed competently. All we are seeing here is an illustration of how _not_ to proceed with making parts and demonstrating an effect.
in what order was the magnet place meaning was is north, south, north or was the top side was north and the bottom side was south????
Just place magnets in a circle mounted around something that it can spin on. then have a counter magnet placed to push the rotation motion to generate electricity.
I don't understand, why so many dislikes this is awesome
Because he doesn't misure the real energy, but only current missing the voltage. We need two Wattmeter in the input and output and after a while invert them so he will really proof that the machine produce more energy that consume. He know this...
V*A only equal Watts at phase =zero. You must use a Watt Meter on each side to rigourously prove your point.
Nice looking prototype, but the watt meter used to measure output power is a poor choice for meaningful measurement at this level. The watt meter used here can be bought on ebay for $10 and is not specified as a true RMS measurement device and is at best 10% accurate using pure DC at this power level. On the input side, without placing a large electrolytic capacitor directly across the driving motor we cannot rely on the ammeter reading. In fact, the driving motor may be consuming far more current than the ammeter indicates. At least add a 100 to 470uf cap across the motor leads and rerun your test.
Ampere are not energy... At output you have Watt=Volt x Ampere (11.07 X 0.18) at input Watt=(?? X 0.100) so? You should use 2 identical analog Wattmeter and invert after a while. Why no one proof correctly??
+Iky piky The same idea struck me, however, the 12V Lead Acid Battery is unlikely to be outputting more than 14.2V when freshly charged, so the numbers would still indicate over unity. Clearly, this is nonsense or he would show the second battery connected to the first, producing a perpetual motion machine .
Can you make the materials to build this and sell them (so that the buyer can put it all together himself)?
Why does this power meter showing current and power when the load side is not connected? When you have open circuit your current is 0A. Another value is not possible, you can measure voltage but never current.
Kacey Quick answer, Kacey. You can't, unless you run an extension cord to your neighbor's house and steal his electricity. Go away bot.
+El Blog de JoseLu90 Without a Load connected to the "Watt Meter", it's apparently displaying the amount of power required to operate the meter itself.
mate just a question. The generator you made produces AC voltage weform isn't it? Then why do you connect it to a battery which is DC without a rectifier made of diodes.
You cannot trust the meter doing so. Buy an oscilloscope and you will see. I cannot say we can't do overunity, but your PMSG motor will never produces more than the DC one.
We will find a way don't worry, keep on !
+2BAB I see 2 diodes and a capacitor... the Watt Meter connects across the capacitor, then through the Watt Meter, then to the battery being charged
beforebefore Sorry mate couldn't see the diodes from here.... then try to put a resistor on the output instead of a battery, that would prob give you something slightly different.
For me it's only using resonance phenomena (casimir effect and so on) that we can reach very high or even over unity yield.
Keep us updated X
How did you made this into.
If I'm wrong, why don't you connect the output from the "generator" to the engine? Well, it won't work like that.
OverUnity? No! On the right side you have direct current, that is, the milliammeter indicates the correct value. On the left is alternating current, straightened and partially smoothed with a capacitor, so we have a pulsating voltage measured with a wattmeter. It indicates exactly only the values of the constant and not pulsating current, it is very inaccurate. The error can be up to 30%. This is because a wattmeter would have to integrate the values of the power transmitted to the battery at a very high frequency (e.g. several thousand times per second), which this cheap meter does not do.
So we can see here huge measurement errors and not free energy.
First law of thermodynamics - Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It can only change forms. In any process, the total energy of the universe remains the same. For a thermodynamic cycle the net heat supplied to the system equals the net work done by the system.
+Joe Grodis What happens to energy that gets drawn in by the electromagnetic gravity field of a black hole?
there are virtual particles popping in and out of existence all the time. When this happens, a particle and its antiparticle appear, and then they recombine and disappear again.When this takes place near an event horizon, strange things can happen. Instead of the two particles existing for a moment and then annihilating each other, one particle can fall into the black hole, and the other particle can fly off into space. Over vast periods of time, this trickle of escaping particles causes the black hole to evaporate.
So, black holes do not destroy energy.
Joe Grodis Thanks for the reply. One more question; Do you know how the discovery of gravitational waves coincides with the theory of hawking radiation? Does the confirmation of Einsteins theory somehow invalidate Hawkings theory? One would think it does but I am not sure. What's your take on it?
George, use a larger magnet gear on the small motor, or larger magnets, or a larger gear with magnets, or reduce the size of the larger one.. Thanks.
I don't understand the point? You are using electricity to create electricity. And there is probably a power loss because perpetual energy or motion is impossible. It should be hooked up to a prop or a hydro turbine to convert kinetic energy to electrical.
How much torque can this put out?
good job George i enjoyed this video ;)
where did you get those blue clips for the magnets? whatr they called?
Idea is sound, but motor need to be much more efficient.
well, we don't see the volts going in or the drop on the analog meter. let's assume (yea i know ass out of "u" and "me").
fully charged batt on right 13.99v drop a 0.11v for the meter under load 13.88vx0.11a = 1.5268 watts on the other side we see, from his watt meter (is it calibrated?) 11.09v @ 0.18a = 1.9962 watts (his showing 1.9 watts) however that is a snap shot in time. it was fluctuating. 11.08v @ 0.16 = 1.7728 watts (his showing 1.7 watts) at a low point 1.7/1.53 = 111%.to 1.9/1.93 = 124% on the high side. we see a magnetic coupling and not a physical coupling of the drive motor and a torque amplification to the generator :O could that be the secret? I have seen a couple of other magnetically coupled machines clamming overunity. and how about some detail on the coil / magnet config of the generator?
What is the use of using a battery to run the small motor to make the Dual Axial Flux Permanent-Magnet Motor to SPIN to charge the other battery??? It does NOT make sense
However, a lead acid battery has only a 50% efficiency (and li-ion 70-80%), so to really have efficiency between a driving and charging battery you need to make up for the 50% efficiency loss by at least double overunity (2x more output than input)
Sure, just saying...
BTW... If we want to really convince everyone overunity is possible... If this video was done one step better it would, a) show the voltage of the driving battery, b) use the same measuring equipment on both sides, and swapped them to indicate similarities, c) rather run a load than charge a battery (but I guess this point does not really matter)... Just too many videos using the word 'overunity' but not convincing enough, especially the input vs output readings... Always something missing, in this case it is the driving battery volts, and non similar equipment....
sorry he is not claiming overunity though, he is asking: OverUnity is iT or Not ? I guess it is a question... I would guess yes it is overunity if you drive a load and follow the steps in my previous comment and still have more output than in. No, if you are taking in consideration the charging battery losing 50% efficiency...
I wonder? If ur motor runs .can it power a second and can the power from second motor have surplus power stored from being disconnect periodically and shut Down charge stored from the deceleration of second motor and returned to first motor. Just a thought thermodynamics is a clingy
Mistress .but two motors are a work force so two to four and so forth power surplus extraction from a gear run system maybe more attainable just a thought I had like ur work very clean .keep it going .
Do you get more Elektricity then you need to run the magnetic motor ? I dont understand for what this is good for !
Wofür ist dieser Motor gut ? Bin nur ein Laie !
. It sure looks like *OVER UNITY* to Me.. excellent Job, all in 10 minutes and 27 seconds.
does it run on its own or are you using batteries.
efharisto poli yorgo, awesome video,thanks for your work.Ask the people how many of them
spend their time for preperation video and answer the questions.The name is not important
you showed us awesome video and ı liked it so much.Thanks again.
If the system has more output than input, then two batteries are not needed. A single battery should never go dead. Make a video of this, with one battery, and only the input connected. Have an ammeter in line with the input, showing the current driving the system. Get the system running and connect output to the input. The ammeter should switch directions, showing the battery is charging, until it's fully charged.
🚨 IF THIS TRULY WORKED, THEN PLACING BATTERIES WITH IN THE CIRCUT WOULD NOT BE NEEDED. OTHERWISE THIS WILL EVENTUALLY COME TO A STOP.
Additionally, this design has virtually no torque. That means no real useable load can be placed on this. IE: Run a house, etc.
Power is A*V = W thats right on the left side. (about 2W)
On the right site you measure just A and you have a different scale. On the right site you have less Voltage ! This means you have less power
Houston, we have a problem! At Time Stamp 6:52, your Digital Watt Meter already displayed "0.10 Amps" BEFORE you even connected it to the Load! You did not "ZERO" your Digital Watt Meter when NO LOAD was connected. How can you get an accurate, trustworthy, meaningful amperage reading from your Digital Watt meter if reads 0.10 Amps with *nothing* connected?
Thanks for your comment ! Ι think that digital watt meter need a "power" to read... also i have and "big capacity capacitor" on the bridge rectifier...
***** I sincerely doubt that the "0.10 Amp" reading is the power needed to operate the Digital Watt Meter. It is very common that DC Amp Meters need to be "ZEROED" before using. And you did *not* perform that very important calibration step. Try using that Analog Meter first in the Motor Circuit and then move that Analog Meter to the Generator Circuit. You will see *LESS* power generated in the output circuit and *MORE* power consumed in motor circuit. Therefore, no over-unity ...
MrSummitville Thank you Any-way! also see ruclips.net/video/bN5I44XbQUE/видео.html
Do you share the specs somewhere of your build? what kinda magnets strenghts, coil wire and turns and disk diameter etc?
I'm very interested in replicating this.
thanks
+Yves Baggi
If you think these devices will work, you are in need of a decent education.
+Peter May you think your education system teach you the truth ? You need to think again
I have built a few devices albeit not specifically for 'free energy' but interesting ones. these intrigue me and like an illusion I'm trying to figue out where the 'trick' is.
One that I do want to replicate is the Steorn engine as the principles are simple to experiment with. This one I'd like to konw also. Maybe it's just a measurement issue.
Anyway, anyone has the specs for this?
+Yves Baggi
The trick is, energy cannot be created or destroyed, entropy rules, OK.
+Toan Nguyen
If you are still paying your electricity bill, you'll know what I mean.
the old project motor of Faraday.
Gostei muito do seu projeto estás de parabéns, e obrigado por colocar a tradução na descrição em português. ganhou um mais um inscrito.
Here's how these devices work:
Step 1 make fake free energy device video
Step 2 monetize the video and get hundreds of thousands of views
Step 3 use the money to pay your power bill
saw your comment redit thought that guy is such a fool getting paid to hate on relatively good work
Collision Pending Who exactly would be paying me to make that comment?
+Reddit Gold User i dont know but there are plenty of paid spammers out there to discredit the work of innovative minds trying to break free of the grid and as someone from redit you are a paid spammer or u are plain ignorent and if it is the latter then forshame
Collision Pending These devices are fake, they don't exist outside of youtube. What kind of world do you live in where you think a free energy device exists, but its inventor gets suppressed by a simple youtube comment? First you are ignoring the fact that overunity devices break the laws of physics, then you take it a step further by assuming these devices exist but some kind of conspiracy exists to suppress it. I could just imagine a corporate meeting "How do we stop this miracle technology? Let's pay some fat neckbeard to leave comments!" Give me a break. Why would they waste their money? The math to prove these work doesn't exist and that's enough to convince everyone who isn't allergic to a bit of research and basic education. Its even more absurd to leave ideas for improvements on the device when you yourself are only speculating on what you think is real.
+Reddit Gold User they are discredited across the internet think of it this way a coil is a magnet yes well if you spin a circle useing one coil the eight underneath are making power from the perma magnets that is eight times more power because only the one on the outside is using any power and if you owned the electric company would you want other people making power taking away their power over us
its a good idea , using a outside power to keep it in motion. in put to out kinda hard to keep up with , but power going in is less or equal to power coming out ,
Измерения сделаны неверно! Нельзя сравнивать ток, когда напряжение разное! Нужно мерять мощность! И как раз на выходе мощность в Ваттах будет меньшие чем на входе. Это потери на преобразовании. А поставь два таких одинаковых измерителя как на выходе. Нет тут чуда.
can you make to a 8x scale with no problems to replace a v8????
it's measuring Flux the invisible power transmitted without belts pulleys. Tesla's power without wires
I originally didn't like your videos I didn't understand the meters! I had been reversed! I was thinking why is he showing that he's using to watts to run the motor and only generating 100 milliamps! LOL! I'm a little backwards sometimes there buddy! LOL! Great video
but you need electricity to run the electric motor that turns the magnets. so why not use that electricity directly to charge the battery, I'm sure the battery running the little electronic motor will run out of energy before it changes the other battery. so it's just a waste of energy.