The way the Plaintiff was rolling her eyes was insane. She doesn't realize that the landlord could have kept a lot more and didn't. There was a lot she didn't originally withhold for. They should have just left it alone instead of getting greedy.
@@wvrjlbecause it's not reasonable? Same way you would have no issue if someone just run the water in the sink the whole day? When you are the one who pays that bill? If they are covering the bill, ok, but they weren't. You think you can rent a place and do thousands in bills and no one will argue against that? Come on.
OMG I can feel my hand forming into a fist aiming at their faces. They seem so sickening to be around. 🙄🙄 That "son" is an old woman Karen right along with her.
i loved the shocked and recoiled look at the end of the case when JM said the plaintiff's sued for the wrong amount, even though she said it earlier that they can't start with the wrong amount, and I'm glad how the defendant had proper proof for things she was out. i just wish she counter-sued to get whatever money she was still out, she probably had earned it, but It's also really awesome that she didn't and just let things go.
People usually say that when they didn't get to present what THEY wanted to say instead of the judge asking the real questions she needs to know to make the decision. People like to fluff and not give facts, then get miffed when she just cuts to what she needs.
Where else should he do it? That's where he lived! If she wanted extra money every month to cover that, I could understand that, but there's really nowhere else for him to charge it. Not being able to charge it at his home is ridiculous. Personally, I would want to see how much hydro that scooter uses, to see if he should pay extra or not. I don't think it's any different from any other personal property, unless it uses much more electricity than the average tenant. And she certainly can't say you're not allowed to use electricity to charge your personal property when people are living there. That's also ridiculous. This is the type of thing somebody who owns their own home would say, because they aren't using common sense about where a tenant is supposed to charge their vehicle that they drive from their home. Of COURSE you would charge it there. If she wanted some additional money to cover it, that is a different matter, but obviously he needs to charge it there. I never heard her say she wanted him to pay extra, she just said he shouldn't charge it there, and that's ridiculous. I also didn't hear where she addressed that issue to him. When she saw he had an electric scooter, she should have approached him saying that he needs to pay extra per month if he wants to charge it there. I just looked up how much electricity the average scooter uses to charge, and it's about $0.15 an hour, or $2.25 for a 12 hour period.
The last time they showed this, everyone had something to say about Calvin being a sharp dresser. I volunteer at a thrift store and we have a fabulous formal wear section! He could be our spokesman!
Right off the bat, knowing the plaintiff's sued for over $6,000 when it should have been $975x3=$2925 - makes me believe the plaintiff's are just looking for a "payday". Defendant wrote off many things, and didn't even countersue. I do have to say the plaintiff came well dressed to court!
I hate to say this but it’s the simple truth. I am a terrible dresser. I buy clothes almost exclusively based on their comfort level. I now live in Florida where the summers sizzle. I have to wear shorts and sleeveless shirts just to survive. Rather ironically, I long for the days when people “gussied up” (as my dear Mom would say) for going out to dinner, traveling, etc. life has changed really drastically in a very short period of time.
Man buddy looks some creepy to me! He definitely plays on the alphabet clubs team!! The plaintiffs should have left well alone!! Love when the plaintiffs loose when they think they are gonna win no matter what
Shouldn't the Landlord be inspecting the home as each tenant moves out? If she did, then I agree the new damages should be at the new tenants expense. If the damages were there prior to moving in then they should've gotten something in writing stating they wouldn't be liable for the damages upon move out
She searched hard for that “itemized report” clause. 😂 But I think the verdict was fair because they technically owed more than they were could’ve legally gotten back so it’s a wash
Wow they definitely got lucky that the landlord didn't countersue them. Definitely not cool he took advantage of her paying the light bill. They should be greatful she gave them the majority of their deposit back
It’s funny how people have such a low opinion of landlords. My husband and I rented out our home because we had to move to another state. We charged a fair rent and ponied up when things had to be repaired. After about two years, we offered to sell the tenants the property for an extremely good price. We weren’t/aren’t wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. We simply felt that they had been wonderful tenants and deserved a break. Sometimes I think that some wealthy people are just too stingy and try to squeeze every dime possible.
There is a lot of homes in Indiana that have been turned into multiple apartments and I’m always wondering how they managed to get so many units from a seemingly normal sized house lmao
I lived in an apartment that was an old home turned apartments...had 4 apartments in it, one was literally just a room with a bathroom, we had the biggest at 2 bedrooms, and the others were one bedroom......and the house I grew up in was bigger lol
Y’all are missing the POINT of these carefully chosen re-uploads lol. Theseeee are clearly the MOST MEMORABLE for different reasons & if u don’t recognize that 🗣CALVIN WAS SERVINGGGG!! 😂😂
Landlords don't steal!I don't! They steal from me. I'm a landlord and my tenants twice destroyed my property and ran out without paying rent for over 7 months.Some use the system .Now I have great tenants.
They seem to think that the law is a blanket rule...if you don't get an itemized statement in that time frame, you get triple the original security deposit. That's NOT the law. You CAN get triple of anything they can PROVE was wrongfully WITHHELD. It isn't a free-for-all for the tenants if they don't get that letter in time.
I was expecting to be on the Plaintiff's side but finished the video cheering for the landlord. That plaintiff lady just doesn't seem to understand you cannot sue for the portion of the deposit that they ALREADY GOT BACK and triple that figure.
Ha! "Justice will get her." 🤷🏽♀️🤔Child, bye. You were wrong and didn't win. Based on the evidence presented, the landlord will prevail in the other cases. The defendant had all of her ducks in a row AND didn't countersue. BTW how do you use someone else's electricity 🤦🏽♀️🤔
in our house, we periodically move the stove and refrigerator and clean behind and under them. That's why the fridge is on rollers. In other words.....EW! leaving it like that? Gross!!
the majority of people do not, the average person doesn't do this with their stove or their fridge, it's not unusual because they're large appliances and some stoves are gas & most aren't willing to cap off the gas just to feel an area that isn't seen by anyone is sparkly clean, that would just be odd.
Thank you! I move the fridge and stove every month or month and a half to clean. Yeah it’s not “seen” but food/drink and random crap could be under it and I’d like to make sure it’s somewhat clean.
Judge didn’t follow the law she didn’t give itemized list any other case like this she did rough justice and did what she was supposed which was rule for the plaintiff on the 975
But isn't the point whether or not she sent/gave the letter in time? I don't feel that charging a scooter IS any different then any other property, like cell phones. Where is he supposed to charge it??? That's where he lives! Is the landlord also going to look at every single tenant and say, you have too many things plugged in versus this person, is she also going to give people rebates on their rent if they don't use as much electricity?? Somehow, I doubt it. And it would be really weird to have on the lease that you can't use the electricity for personal property, considering that's where they live. I certainly would not sign a lease like that.
You didn’t understand anything ..,it was in the lease that you cannot use electricity in common areas because the landlord pays for that bill …if they didn’t want that provision in the lease they shouldn’t have signed on . And the letter not sent within the time frame is not the point in that case because they are suing for triple the amount of the whole security deposit which should not be the case .It doesn’t matter if they received the itemized letter late because the landlord only withheld a certain amount of that for damages which she had proven ( she did not arbitrarily withhold the full deposit amount) while the plaintiffs cannot prove their case and turned out owing the landlord much more than she deducted. And charging your scooter is not the same as using any regular appliance or cellphone/computer in the house. If he needs his scooter charged because that’s” where he lived “ , he could could have asked the landlord to pay for charging his scooter which as as the judge said eats up more elec. instead of sneakily charging it .
That’s what I was thinking too. Also, you mean to tell me I’m renting a room and I can’t plug my damn electric scooter in on the outside of the house to charge? That’s crazy to me.
@@BeccasaurousRex270 then she should have presented him with the next mailed electric bill after he did this, which she did not, she chose to bring it up in court because she's another landlord who didn't have the security deposit to give back to anyone, therefore she conjures up bullshit "damages"
I don't get the whole "charging the scooter" thing. If the scooter needs to be charged, then where is he supposed to charge it? If I'm renting a house, I should be free to use whatever electricity I need. If the landlord doesn't like it, then the lease should state that the tenants are responsible for the electricity bill. A landlord shouldn't be able to tell a tenant "No, you can't plug in your XXX because I don't want to pay the electric bill." That's ridiculous.
Should the landlord pay for their soap and shampoo they use water, how about their cell phone or internet bill , should she pay that just cause they need to charge it . Heck they park a car in the driveway so I guess landlord should pay for their gas also.
@@Ailenna her and mathis have their weaknesses. Ex judge milian will correct the grammar of people who struggle with english in the most rude way possible. Mathis doesnt, he just reads between the lines when it comes to poor grammar
The way the Plaintiff was rolling her eyes was insane. She doesn't realize that the landlord could have kept a lot more and didn't. There was a lot she didn't originally withhold for. They should have just left it alone instead of getting greedy.
She seems like a good landlord. The plaintiffs were kinda creepy in the end interview.
i second that
I think telling him he can't plug in his scooter is ridiculous. Where else is he supposed to charge it? That's where he lives.
@@wvrjlbecause it's not reasonable? Same way you would have no issue if someone just run the water in the sink the whole day? When you are the one who pays that bill? If they are covering the bill, ok, but they weren't. You think you can rent a place and do thousands in bills and no one will argue against that? Come on.
OMG I can feel my hand forming into a fist aiming at their faces. They seem so sickening to be around. 🙄🙄 That "son" is an old woman Karen right along with her.
i loved the shocked and recoiled look at the end of the case when JM said the plaintiff's sued for the wrong amount, even though she said it earlier that they can't start with the wrong amount, and I'm glad how the defendant had proper proof for things she was out. i just wish she counter-sued to get whatever money she was still out, she probably had earned it, but It's also really awesome that she didn't and just let things go.
That oven looked pretty clean. Did she expect it to look brand new?
The “judge didn’t let us put forth all the evidence”. Yes she did.
People usually say that when they didn't get to present what THEY wanted to say instead of the judge asking the real questions she needs to know to make the decision. People like to fluff and not give facts, then get miffed when she just cuts to what she needs.
How do you know?
The plaintiffs seem off and greedy. Charging your vehicle off the landlords power is just wrong. Good landlord bad tenants in this case.
Where else should he do it? That's where he lived! If she wanted extra money every month to cover that, I could understand that, but there's really nowhere else for him to charge it. Not being able to charge it at his home is ridiculous. Personally, I would want to see how much hydro that scooter uses, to see if he should pay extra or not. I don't think it's any different from any other personal property, unless it uses much more electricity than the average tenant. And she certainly can't say you're not allowed to use electricity to charge your personal property when people are living there. That's also ridiculous.
This is the type of thing somebody who owns their own home would say, because they aren't using common sense about where a tenant is supposed to charge their vehicle that they drive from their home. Of COURSE you would charge it there. If she wanted some additional money to cover it, that is a different matter, but obviously he needs to charge it there. I never heard her say she wanted him to pay extra, she just said he shouldn't charge it there, and that's ridiculous. I also didn't hear where she addressed that issue to him. When she saw he had an electric scooter, she should have approached him saying that he needs to pay extra per month if he wants to charge it there.
I just looked up how much electricity the average scooter uses to charge, and it's about $0.15 an hour, or $2.25 for a 12 hour period.
The last time they showed this, everyone had something to say about Calvin being a sharp dresser. I volunteer at a thrift store and we have a fabulous formal wear section! He could be our spokesman!
A smart dresser that I am certainly not.
My son just had his graduation, and i got all his formal clothing from a charity thrift store!
Right off the bat, knowing the plaintiff's sued for over $6,000 when it should have been $975x3=$2925 - makes me believe the plaintiff's are just looking for a "payday". Defendant wrote off many things, and didn't even countersue. I do have to say the plaintiff came well dressed to court!
Thr bowtie though.
@@ButtonsCasey I know! As someone else said, is he going to prom? haha He did try more than others tho.
I like bowties people just have no real style coming for his personal touch but I agree with the math because it seems like they wanted more money
@@mahailiabrown3972 my husband wears a bow tie. I bought him his first one and many others. He still wears neck ties.
I hate to say this but it’s the simple truth. I am a terrible dresser. I buy clothes almost exclusively based on their comfort level. I now live in Florida where the summers sizzle. I have to wear shorts and sleeveless shirts just to survive. Rather ironically, I long for the days when people “gussied up” (as my dear Mom would say) for going out to dinner, traveling, etc. life has changed really drastically in a very short period of time.
Why does this kid look like he’s going to a wedding?
“Justice will get her” 😂stfu
The defendant seemed like a very fair landlord
Happy Monday People’s Court Fam!
I hope you have a awesome week!!
Hi Susie ☺️
I hope you guys enjoy your fortnight ( 2 weeks)
Back at ya!🙂
Entitlement. So glad the landlord won 😅😊
Haha the way she describes the roommate situation at the beginning is a great example of the Ship of Theseus Paradox.
What some tenants don't understand is that a landlord can still sue them for damages even if they returned all or part of their security deposit if
So glad he used his feel to film. Very professional
Calvin has zero friends. They'd have told him the blue bow tie sux and his coat is too small...😅😂😂
The plaintiffs looks sooo offended LOL
Dude going to prom. Lol
Oof, mom raised her son into a little Karen who doesn't take responsibility for his actions.
Well stated
I knew how difficult he was gonna be by looking at his hair 😂
@@XrainbowXcookieand that bowtie
wow he's like an extra from the movie Pretty in Pink
Man buddy looks some creepy to me! He definitely plays on the alphabet clubs team!! The plaintiffs should have left well alone!! Love when the plaintiffs loose when they think they are gonna win no matter what
you are a nasty person huh
Her shows is like a fiddle. Renter, landlord cases, dog cases, auto accidents. Need variety, I'm so done, stick me with a fork. Lol
Shouldn't the Landlord be inspecting the home as each tenant moves out? If she did, then I agree the new damages should be at the new tenants expense. If the damages were there prior to moving in then they should've gotten something in writing stating they wouldn't be liable for the damages upon move out
The plaintiff is dressed like he is going to a club.
She searched hard for that “itemized report” clause. 😂
But I think the verdict was fair because they technically owed more than they were could’ve legally gotten back so it’s a wash
Wow they definitely got lucky that the landlord didn't countersue them. Definitely not cool he took advantage of her paying the light bill. They should be greatful she gave them the majority of their deposit back
He looks like he is having a tantrum form the beginning and the friend crazy as s...
Calvin . . . This is not your Jr Prom , Sweetie 🕺
Call me crazy....but that baby blue tie/ginger hair combo is doing it for me.
Where did the 6600 or 8000 come from! Who's trying to Rob who! 🤣
Once again entitled mentality.
Is it entitlement or just ignorance?
@@charles0322mrsdani Both.
It’s the tux for me 😂
It’s funny how people have such a low opinion of landlords. My husband and I rented out our home because we had to move to another state. We charged a fair rent and ponied up when things had to be repaired. After about two years, we offered to sell the tenants the property for an extremely good price. We weren’t/aren’t wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. We simply felt that they had been wonderful tenants and deserved a break. Sometimes I think that some wealthy people are just too stingy and try to squeeze every dime possible.
How big is that house that it can be broken into 5 units.
There is a lot of homes in Indiana that have been turned into multiple apartments and I’m always wondering how they managed to get so many units from a seemingly normal sized house lmao
I lived in an apartment that was an old home turned apartments...had 4 apartments in it, one was literally just a room with a bathroom, we had the biggest at 2 bedrooms, and the others were one bedroom......and the house I grew up in was bigger lol
A Victorian house.
They should of lost the suit just for his suit 😎
They're reupload past episodes that were previously uploaded
A house that was divided into 5 units, and the one unit they lived in had 3 bedrooms. How big was this house?!
With these two plaintiffs, it's apparent that apples don't fall far from the tree.
lol they trashed the place and wanted a windfall. at the end they think they know the law better than the judge
Check his bow tie out 🤣
It’s a shame the defendant didn’t bring a counter suit.
Defendant is a really really nice lady!
Y’all are missing the POINT of these carefully chosen re-uploads lol. Theseeee are clearly the MOST MEMORABLE for different reasons & if u don’t recognize that 🗣CALVIN WAS SERVINGGGG!! 😂😂
Ok know it all
Mr karen there at the end "Justice WILL get her!" GROW UP!
plaintiff and her SON are being greedy. love the son's tie.
Ashley looks and acts like a 40 yr pta mother of 3 thats going to a soccer game after court lmaoo
Such a sweet sweet landlord!
Landlords don't steal!I don't! They steal from me.
I'm a landlord and my tenants twice destroyed my property and ran out without paying rent for over 7 months.Some use the system .Now I have great tenants.
The deposit dispo must be mailed, not received, within 21 days.
Once again a case of greedy tenants
What the heck was that Calvin thing?
Why be a landlord or business owner in California? Laws are against you from the start. 😮
These are the prime examples of the gentrifiers that have plagued the Bay Area in CA. That’s what y’all get lol
were the mother/son sharing a single bedroom? EWWW
He said it was a three bedroom.
They seem to think that the law is a blanket rule...if you don't get an itemized statement in that time frame, you get triple the original security deposit. That's NOT the law. You CAN get triple of anything they can PROVE was wrongfully WITHHELD. It isn't a free-for-all for the tenants if they don't get that letter in time.
1:21 judge asks what’s going on with the plaintiff.
Less than 10 seconds
1:29 Judge needs all the attention.
I was expecting to be on the Plaintiff's side but finished the video cheering for the landlord. That plaintiff lady just doesn't seem to understand you cannot sue for the portion of the deposit that they ALREADY GOT BACK and triple that figure.
Ha! "Justice will get her." 🤷🏽♀️🤔Child, bye. You were wrong and didn't win. Based on the evidence presented, the landlord will prevail in the other cases. The defendant had all of her ducks in a row AND didn't countersue. BTW how do you use someone else's electricity 🤦🏽♀️🤔
The plaintiffs are creepy lol both of their mouths are super annoying
Either this one is a reupload or these 2 are on here again. Know I recognize them both!
Doesn't matter who pays power. You get to charge your vehicle where you live. They don't like it.. make them pay on the next renewal.
The problem is that he was using her power because he plugged into her outlet. If he had used his own, he would have paid for it.
dude needs to sit on upside down barstool and relax
That’s pretty ballzy to sue your landlord for the damages that You caused. Typical Democrat from Oakland, CA !
This couple look like mother and son.
Wait! You mean they are not mother and son?
Can the Plaintiff get a suit that’s any smaller?
I believe the male plaintiff would park a pair on his chin.
in our house, we periodically move the stove and refrigerator and clean behind and under them. That's why the fridge is on rollers. In other words.....EW! leaving it like that? Gross!!
the majority of people do not, the average person doesn't do this with their stove or their fridge, it's not unusual because they're large appliances and some stoves are gas & most aren't willing to cap off the gas just to feel an area that isn't seen by anyone is sparkly clean, that would just be odd.
Thank you! I move the fridge and stove every month or month and a half to clean. Yeah it’s not “seen” but food/drink and random crap could be under it and I’d like to make sure it’s somewhat clean.
Judge didn’t follow the law she didn’t give itemized list any other case like this she did rough justice and did what she was supposed which was rule for the plaintiff on the 975
Greedy tenants 😂😂😂
This landlady was way too nice
calvin comes across as a bizarre guy. i would not him around my living area. his roommate
is strange too.
But isn't the point whether or not she sent/gave the letter in time?
I don't feel that charging a scooter IS any different then any other property, like cell phones. Where is he supposed to charge it??? That's where he lives! Is the landlord also going to look at every single tenant and say, you have too many things plugged in versus this person, is she also going to give people rebates on their rent if they don't use as much electricity?? Somehow, I doubt it.
And it would be really weird to have on the lease that you can't use the electricity for personal property, considering that's where they live. I certainly would not sign a lease like that.
You didn’t understand anything ..,it was in the lease that you cannot use electricity in common areas because the landlord pays for that bill …if they didn’t want that provision in the lease they shouldn’t have signed on . And the letter not sent within the time frame is not the point in that case because they are suing for triple the amount of the whole security deposit which should not be the case .It doesn’t matter if they received the itemized letter late because the landlord only withheld a certain amount of that for damages which she had proven ( she did not arbitrarily withhold the full deposit amount) while the plaintiffs cannot prove their case and turned out owing the landlord much more than she deducted.
And charging your scooter is not the same as using any regular appliance or cellphone/computer in the house. If he needs his scooter charged because that’s” where he lived “ , he could could have asked the landlord to pay for charging his scooter which as as the judge said eats up more elec. instead of sneakily charging it .
Re upload.
A respectful question: are the plaintiffs mother and son or boyfriend and girlfriend?
Kinda bates feeling here 😢 sorry Norman 😂😅
Its like a wanna be Chris Chan Mom and Son combo
Normal wear and tear for the floor tile ?????
Nice bow tie..
If he had hooked up the charging cable coming out of the window of their own apartment surely then it is on HIS own electricity bill?...
That’s what I was thinking too. Also, you mean to tell me I’m renting a room and I can’t plug my damn electric scooter in on the outside of the house to charge? That’s crazy to me.
The defendant clearly stated that she pays the utility bill, the tenants aren’t paying utilities. It was a room rental situation
@@BeccasaurousRex270 then she should have presented him with the next mailed electric bill after he did this, which she did not, she chose to bring it up in court because she's another landlord who didn't have the security deposit to give back to anyone, therefore she conjures up bullshit "damages"
If Liberace had a son.
hahah doh!
We getting repeats? I hear show being cancelled? 🤔
Is he going on the prom
Pretty sure the plaintiffs are just friends.
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
They found out about three times more and though payday
not bright lights
how petty?
his feet🤮
Yessss calvin u win
An old episode. Reuploading on repeat. :(
😂😂😂
Um....the outfit? And this is a boring episode.
I don't get the whole "charging the scooter" thing. If the scooter needs to be charged, then where is he supposed to charge it? If I'm renting a house, I should be free to use whatever electricity I need. If the landlord doesn't like it, then the lease should state that the tenants are responsible for the electricity bill. A landlord shouldn't be able to tell a tenant "No, you can't plug in your XXX because I don't want to pay the electric bill." That's ridiculous.
Should the landlord pay for their soap and shampoo they use water, how about their cell phone or internet bill , should she pay that just cause they need to charge it . Heck they park a car in the driveway so I guess landlord should pay for their gas also.
Tall head 23
It costs next to nothing to charge a scooter. How petty. The judge is stupid.
Commie california😂
Owning your own home provides so many more benefits over renting. I can't get with all the drama going on in these cases over unpaid rent.
Judge milian is so odd, when you correct her she gets annoyed but conversely she has no issue doing it.
I think is all TV Judges, "I get paid the big bucks" to do wherever I do. Like the silent code.
@@Ailenna her and mathis have their weaknesses. Ex judge milian will correct the grammar of people who struggle with english in the most rude way possible. Mathis doesnt, he just reads between the lines when it comes to poor grammar
Because she’s a know it all.
because you don't do things like that to a judge in a courtroom