Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Why Only Us: The Origin of Human Language
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 май 2017
- Prof. Robert C. Berwick (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
This recording was made at the Society of Catholic Scientists Conference-Origins-April 21-23, 2017. To see other videos and learn more about the Society of Catholic Scientists, visit www.catholicscientists.org.
i just wanna know the name of that Mozart song at the end
Piano Sonata No. 11, andante grazioso
62) Classical Latvian-Basilisk latviešu valoda,
62) klasiskā latviešu-klasiskā latviešu valoda,
Ja
tikko dzimušu bērnu tur izolētā veidā, bet neviens ar bērnu
nekontaktējas, pēc dažām dienām tas runā un runā cilvēka dabiskajā
(prakritiskajā) valodā, kas pazīstama kā Classical Magahi Magadhi /
Klasiskā Chandaso valoda / Magadhi Prakrit / Classical Hela Basa (Hela
Language) / Klasiskie Pali, kas ir vienādi. Buda runāja Magadhi. Visas 7111 valodas un dialekti ir parādījušies Classical Magahi Magadhi. Tāpēc visiem tiem ir klasisks raksturs (prakrits), tāpat kā visām pārējām dzīvajām runām ir savas dabiskās valodas saziņai.
மிக்க நன்றி நல்ல தகவல்
Very interesting.
It does seem to raise and eyebrow as to why we have anything that effects us beyond primitive survival.
If you ask the question which species is best at survival you would think humans, however every species along with us has survived just as well as we have. Why are we so darn head and shoulders above the rest, when it seems being a spider or a fish, succeeds in survival just as well as we do.
Another interesting thing I’ve been thinking is, do we have a theory on how consciousness is distributed among living beings? For instance why was I born a human being? Why was I not born in the 15century? why Was my consciousness not born into a fish.
It seems the only answers I ever get are because your parents didn’t live then, but that doesn’t do it for me, I have a brother who was also born 4 years before me from the same parents...Why was I not him? I have a distinct view of reality. That seems to be unique apart from my body and brain. How does strict science explain this phenomenon? And is it even possible for a strict science to do that?
No, Robert, not you or other 'linguists', but Ans Schapendonk did rediscover how language and evolution is functioning.And this deals with the 'standje
69', which 6 and 9 are like 1 and 0, since they only differ a fraction, because
of 5 x 5 > 5 x 4 > ( 4 x 10 > 10 x 3 > 3 x 4) > 4 x 8 > 8 x 7
= 56. Instead of x (Joris and the dragon), now have to take + (Lam Gods): 5 + 6
= 11, which you have to dubbele: the eleven of the eleven, that is helixing out
of 'the half of the half (from hundred). Than again, you have 25%, which is
also 5 x 5, but different. Its explains THE relation between quantum (4) and
QUINT, I.c. Quintessense, i.c. STRINGTHEORY. The nummer eleven (alife) are THE
semiconductors (halfgeleiders in Dutch: dubbele Dutch, fiftyfifty, what is the
situation in our pinaple gland, the reason why we can speak, can REFLECT! Since
the soundhelix (soundhelix, Lauthelix) is SLANG (Dutch for snake), which means
DIALECT, which has a universal FIX pattern, with the help I could find this worldformule
which ends with the SAPONIFICATION (verzeping). Out of eleven you get twelve,
because out of numbers words are growing. In Dutch ELEVEN TWELVE means ONS DOES
(our dog) that is helixing in ONZE DOUCHE (our shower) and Than UNSERE DUSCHE
which is helixing in ZIRBELDRUESE (pineal gland ... You see, the P is gone now
like the K in 'I know'. Words are growing longer at the end and solve at the
front. Out of TORA is by slang growing the bible and Than Koran which is
changing now in QUADRANT. So out of religeous texts are growing naturscientific
Forms. It seams unbelievable, but it is true. I wrokte 9000 pages about this
theory of the midwives during the lost millennium, who are the earlier Jewish
women. The university of MARBURG (microbiologists) and FULDA (theologists)
stole my research and after getting 146000000 euro from the german
gouvernement, they will publish this NOT, since they know that the real ISRAËL
is not in the East, but in the West: the North of France called ARTOIS. German
archeologists never found anything in Israël about the bible (12/2005 Bild der
Wissenschaften). not the bible makes a mistake, since they are searching in the
WRONG country. GOD is helixing out of DOG (I.c. MADOG) what means DOGGERSBANK
in the Northsea, where 8200 years ago was a tsunami. This is what Germany is
hiding, since there history belongs to GERMAINE (France) which is helixing in
(g)HEER MAINE, Gods hand, which deals with the LAM(b), but there are THREE of
them: LUTEOLINE, QUERCETINE and RUTINE. All molecule are DRAWING, called FRIES
(strip, comics, since STRING in Dutch means ONDERBROEK and that deals with
ONDERBROEKENLOL during CARNAVAL (the Fall of the flesh), because of the VANDE
in the ' elfde van de elfde' which is helixing in VIANDE (meat), VIJAND, FEIND,
EIND, EINDER alias HORIZON alias KIM alias MIK, which is a CORN > CORNER,
since out of MAT > MEAT > MIJTER, a dubbel PENTAGRAM. The rest you can
read on other places. The DOG (Dutch 'hond') is helixing DEUGD > TUGEND which means 'two kind
of men' (French: Les gens). The reason why the bible is talking about the
'good' and the 'bad' (i.c. blak (Dutch 'transparent') > BLACK / BLANCHE
(white > 'white nose'. This figure you can see in polar light, since it
deals with Yin / Yang.
DOG / GOD deals with HOND > HONDERD (100) > HUN DRIETJES (100), but
also 'The Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, which is LAM / MAL (copy). The
ONE and the ZERO's deals with DAK > DEKA (tan > ten > tien > CHIEN
(French 'dog') > DEKAM (gelforese) > DE-KAMER (the room, but a 'raam' is
a 'quarter' - 4 dots which are changing in 5 dots (pentagram) > DE-KAMER-ONE
(the room nr. one), but ONE is speaking like WAN but is helixint in OHNE
(zonder, without). So the WAN > WANORDE (chaos) > (w)EEN ORDE(r), but WAN
is helixing out of TAN > TUAN > (t) WAN, which means that out of Moses
TEN COMMANDS is now helixing 'ONE ORDE' (no chaos), since we now have
UNDERSTAND what the soundhelix is and for all WHAT we can do with this system,
than Juan Maldacena (MAL - CENA) did not FIND OUT this MAT-he-MAT-ician by his
own. He got the theory of his corrupt colleague Robbert Dijkgraaf, who told
this theory to Erik Verlinde, the so called 'new dutch Einstein'. Not men did find out this, but WOMEN, the 'madog' (mother > daughter)
and than MEN are really MAD DOGS. So, good luck with 'your' theory. I know what
will happen with people who are not behaving themselves, than HIDING the
soundhelix for the 'normal' people (volk > volks > volkstaal > VOL (k)
STAAL) and making STALEN BOLLEBOZEN (robots) will KILL human beings. Thank you
LAAGHOOFD > LEEGHOOFD > LEGERHOOFDEN. But the KARMA > the 'MA'
(mothers) will pull out the 'kar' (wagon) OUT of the MODDER (moeder), since
GRAND SLAMPS like this only shows how stupid some human beings are: LABY RINTH:
not the 'milk of the cow' (koevoet > koe voedt), but 'STOM RUND'. Our place
is on earth and not in the universe.
With SEVEN dots you can build FIVE five-houses, which I called in my
articles (28.10.13 on Research Gate, which closed my account) and books
(Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) in 2014, 2015, 2016 the BAK ZEVEN because of
'saponification' (8 x 7 = 56) since out of SEVEN > EIGHT, which only in
DUTCH language is possible to see STAP (> stuiver: 5) > (s)TAP > ZAP
(zeep > zeven) > SAP (sapvis > sfinx) > SEVEN. But ZEEP > ZEEF
(i.c. 'shower') what is helixing in SEES (he is 'seeing', he 'discover') in the
'number' a 'drawing', a 'design' > a SIGN > SIGNAL. A jewish tradition is
ZEVEN > ACHT > SIEBENACHT.So, what did these 'guys'? COPYING my work without telling WHO was did find
out these things. Who are these 'condensed matter theorists'? I want to know
the NAMES of the persons.It is at the end the number NINE, in Dutch NEGEN (palindroom) helixing out
of the SIX, which a the 'lamp' (going out) and the 'bag' (going inside) and
than they 'overlap' (6 + 9). This kind of DUALITY men did not understood in the
last MILLENIA. Its is 'one + one' which gives 'three', but the 'ones' are
growing from 'fourt' (square) into 'fives' (pentagrams)! But turn around an
elastic ring, you get the 'eight' (infinity), but put one side over the other,
you get THREE (w)HOLES, but two are 'not real' (pseudo). So when the pentagram
(nr 5) gives a VI (2) TRI (3) > VITRINE (window, square) you also have TRI
(3) VI (2) > TRIVIAL.
At the end you have 'de gulden snede' with the number of the DEVIL / LIVED
(permutation), which men never realised: 0,666. The reason is that they never
did realise tthat there are not only TWO Penrose-figures, but FOUR (pijl,
vlieger) with a form of a SQUARE (4 dots) but with a little TRIANGLE (3 dots)
which is moving. It goes 'around the corner' (invisable), which means in Dutch
'dying', but Memento Mori (gedenk te sterven) means after helixing GE DENKT TE
STERVEN (you are only think, you will dye ... but you will NOT, since your
SOULE / Holy Ghost is going out of your 'dead body', in case AFVAL >
AFVALLIGE > BEVALLIG LICHT 'licht op'. So out of dead stuff, there is
growing somethind NEW, a 'light', which
can be a 'laser', but also a 'light mass', but mass (chaos) > massa (weight,
strong force), but it also means VOLK > FOLK > FOLKLORE > FULL OF
COLOURS .. Ans Schapendonk (6 augustus, 2017)
you must have been having a really bad day when you wrote this
Oh no, not at all since I know that my university (Philipps-University Marburg, Germany) did receive 671.000.000 euro between 2013-2106 and another 58.000.000 euro in 2017 for RESEARCH. It was not a coincident that In 2014 a whistleblower accused his university of using MY WORK that should be 'worldwide' discussed in relation with the manner physicians try to HIDE this. After publishing now 'their' results every student can see that they only did publish MY WORK. You should be asking yourself WHAT they did REDISCOVER?That is the KNOWLEDGE of earlier women, called MATRIARCHAAT who leaves us their COINS on which we can find the same 'designs' as in molecules, polar light, condensed water, etc. since these 'materials' all have a MEMORY like human being do have a LANGUAGE, the christen motiv of the SNAKE which is in Dutch SLANG, which means in English DIALECT, the 'word' of Jesus. But it never was a GOD, since it is MA-the-MA-tics! www.uni-marburg.de/de/aktuelles/news/wissenschaftsstandort-hessen28.08.2017I suppose you do not understand German Language .. that is a big handicap for you and many others, since the SOUNDHELIX (klankhelix, Lauthelix) is based on DUTCH language (which is OLDER than German or English language) with the help you can find natural science information in molecules. Pressemitteilung der Konferenz Hessischer Universitätspräsidien (KHU):Austausch, Vernetzung und Karriereberatung stehen traditionell im Fokus der Jahrestagung des German Academic International Network (GAIN): Bereits zum 17. Mal hat die GAIN-Tagung in San Francisco, USA, über dreihundert deutsche Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler, die derzeit in den USA forschen und eine Rückkehr nach Deutschland erwägen, mit Vertreterinnen und Vertretern aus Wissenschaft, Politik und Wirtschaft in Deutschland zusammengebracht. Erstmals haben in diesem Jahr die Präsidentinnen und Präsidenten aller hessischen Universitäten gemeinsam mit dem Hessischen Minister für Wissenschaft und Kunst Boris Rhein den Wissenschafts- und Wirtschaftsstandort Hessen präsentiert: Hessen war ein Länderschwerpunkt auf der Tagung.„Hessen ist ein Land mit sehr leistungsstarken Universitäten, die international sehr sichtbare und exzellente Forschungsschwerpunkte in allen Fächerzonen aufweisen“, so Prof. Dr. Joybrato Mukherjee, Präsident der Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (JLU), Sprecher der Konferenz Hessischer Universitätspräsidien (KHU) und Vizepräsident des Deutschen Akademischen Austauschdienstes (DAAD). „Gerade heute gibt es für deutsche Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler hervorragende berufliche Möglichkeiten und Karriereoptionen in Hessen.“ Mit Drittmitteleinnahmen in Höhe von rund 563 Millionen Euro pro Jahr und knapp 155.000 Studierenden demonstrieren die fünf hessischen Universitäten eindrucksvoll die enorme Attraktivität und Bedeutung des Wissenschaftsstandortes Hessen.Während der GAIN-Jahrestagung haben die Präsidentinnen und Präsidenten hessischer Hochschulen sowie Wissenschaftsminister Boris Rhein bei einem Workshop die Arbeitsmarktsituation am Wissenschafts- und Wirtschaftsstandort Hessen dargestellt. Neben den Karrierewegen an hessischen Hochschulen stand die Verlässlichkeit der Karriereplanung im Fokus - Themen, die gerade für junge Akademikerinnen und Akademiker von großem Interesse sind.Durch die Rückgewinnung von in den USA bestens vernetzten Forscherinnen und Forschern ergeben sich für die hessischen Universitäten auch wichtige Perspektiven für die Internationalisierung, da die zurückkehrenden Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler die hessischen Hochschulen direkt mit den besten Forschungsuniversitäten in den USA in Verbindung bringen.Wissenschaftsminister Boris Rhein: „Ich habe gerne die Gelegenheit genutzt, den Wissenschaftsstandort Hessen mit seinen exzellenten Landesprogrammen vorzustellen und damit Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern Lust auf eine mögliche Rückkehr und damit Forschung sowie Lehre in unserem Bundesland zu machen. Mit unserem Bauprogramm HEUREKA und dem bundesweit einzigartigen Forschungsförderprogramm LOEWE haben wir in den vergangenen Jahren ein rasantes Wachstum in Wissenschaft und Forschung erreicht. Mit HEUREKA stellen wir den Hochschulen insgesamt vier Milliarden Euro für Ausbau und Sanierung bis 2025 zur Verfügung. Bundesweit einmalig ist das Forschungsförderprogramm LOEWE, das interdisziplinäre und standortübergreifende Forschung auf Spitzenniveau ermöglicht. Für das Programm haben wir bis 2016 bereits insgesamt rund 671 Millionen Euro bereitgestellt. Im Jahr 2017 beträgt das LOEWE-Budget rund 58 Millionen Euro. Außerdem haben wir allein in diesem Jahr 160 neue Professorenplanstellen und 50 Professorenstellen für den wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchs geschaffen sowie mehr Geld für die Studentenwerke zur Verfügung gestellt. Insgesamt stärkt das Land Wissenschaft und Forschung in 2017 mit über 2,685 Milliarden Euro.“GAIN ist eine Gemeinschaftsinitiative der Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, des Deutschen Akademischen Austauschdienstes (DAAD) und der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) und wird durch das Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) gefördert. Die Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, die Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft, die Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, die Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, die Hochschulrektorenkonferenz, die Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes e.V. und die Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V. sind assoziierte Mitglieder.
are you a linguist? what are your publications?
What needs to be looked into is that while humans may be the only animal to develop syntactic language, the DNA in every form of human life from 3.8 billion years ago onward has language-based programming with correction mechanisms and proofreading of code that requires this same sort of "understanding". Human language is the single incident where the language of life becomes manifest in the brain of an animal composed of this language-based DNA.
This, of course, has theological implications, and overturns the materialist view of evolution.
no mention of the age constraints? no mention of complexity constraints? No elimination of everyone that is over 13 from your model? No eliminations based on complexity from your model?
"we can tie the points of Wallace's problem together"? hahahaha Yeah, but only if you ignore 200+ years of language evidence.
It is hard to believe that people consider a video like this to be science.
lol, the guy is a professor from MIT
@@McRingil SHHH I do not think he realised this.
@@johnnotrealname8168 probably just heard of it on statistics 101 and played smart
@@McRingil Prof. Robert C. Berwick (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (it is in the description box) does mention age differences but ultimately I do not see how it is relevant to the topic of the talk. De Selby commented on Ans Schapendonk's thread so I really do not no what happened in that year? Yeah it sounds like a person who does not realise what these guys (and gals) have been doing though legitimate criticism is necessary for Science. Thank You for the intelligent conversation.