You know what could do with the queen swearing.When the queen near with kids she use friendly language like Fudge or heck and when their no kids around she swear.That could’ve been a nice detail to add instead people think it’s funny that kids swear.
How did they have that "hat bumb" joke, and not escalate it to a whole line of troops like dominos? How did they not have an "anti joke" where the soldiers finally get it right and avoid bumping heads, just to them fuck up something else even more important? How did they not have one where one soldier fills his hat with something heavy, so the guy doing the bumping gets hurt instead? These comedy shows need a god damn writers room.
I genuinely can’t understand how the writers for these shows think that anything they make will be remotely funny. It’s like they’re aliens or something
@@Fruityfruitcat Your comment made me imagine a pair of aliens on Earth trying to make a living by attempting to write human comedy. Somehow, this childish thought was way more funny than anything in the actual comedy.
They could have had them never bring it up until the one time they don’t bump each other and then one congratulates the other about not messing up the bow only for something else to go wrong.
The hat joke would probably be funnier if the other guy just didn't say anything, and was just resigned to this annoying thing because of how soulless his job is, and the extent to which the other guy is getting knocked over gets more and more insane
Wow, an actual joke that with good enough execution could have been the funniest thing in the whole series. Such a shame that paid writers are literally worse than the average 13 year old.
Another way of improving it could have been to adapt the time-honored "switcheroo" gag, where after being subjected to the hat bump a few times, the guard tries to circumvent it happening again, say by switching around where they're standing only to have his hat bumped the other way when the other guard straightens back from the head-nod. This could then escalate into more convoluted means of avoiding getting his hat bumped, only for the attempts to go poorly for him.
amazing idea. literally something as simple as having the guy who typically gets hit accidentally hit the ‘hitter’ and have the hitter get super pissed. anything could have improved the gag because it literally had no punch line lol
That's exactly what I was thinking. Just have him say nothing, then have him react at the end. At the very least the "stop" would've been funnier, but you could've had him just straight up tackle the other guy in the background.
@@GuitarTory that's also one thing some people don't get in appeal of anime: it's not treating its audience like morons or thinks immature = edgy... Compare Berserk or Sayonara Zetsubou Sensei to Family Guy ffs. From western "adult" animation I liked Metalocalypse. It was great! Futurama also decent. Then there's the edgelords... Oh and Xavier Renegade Angel seems interesting, makes me think of Kuuchuu Buranko.
These " adult " animated shows aren't for adults they're actually targeted for 13 year olds because no one seems to understand what makes an adults animated show funny to adults
no teen would actually enjoy this though unlike shows like family guy there's not an audience for this type of show at least family guy goes all out so there's the facade of comedy
Any thirteen year old I know would hate this show as much as you do. I would say "no one seems to understand what makes an adults animated show funny."
It is. It's honestly painful to watch. Like, paradise police was... Eh. Cringy, but good as background noise with the occasional chuckle at how stupid it was. This one was like grating a blackboard for fun
Tryg: it is. I managed to get half way thru it, and I just quit. I made it thru 1 season of the PD cartoon, no problem (tho it sucked half way thru it’s 2nd season.) Usually I develop a “awwww hell, I don’t like to quit” mentality on multiple season shows. (A non-cartoon: Happy Endings, beat me. But I figured it’s not a cartoon…). Yeah I’m an idiot
Something I will _never_ understand about adult animation is, why are the designs all so ugly? I'm pretty sure being an adult doesn't mean we don't like good designs.
A lot of people still think cartoons are for children. So when they try to make adult cartoons, it probably fries their brain on how so they settle for making everything look ugly because cute and appealing is for children.
I think these adult comedy cartoons have mistakenly equated “shock” with “comedy” in the same way American horror movies in the 2000’s mistook “gross” with “scary”.
this show specifically is beyond that. its like they decided to write an outline for an episode with all the description of "this happens" and forgot to add anything else
Well gross-out is a type of fear according to Stephen King, but not all gross-out moments are done well, just like not all “shock” moments are done well. There has to be setup
I think a funnier take on the Queen would be if she were more passive aggressive and still spoke in 'the Queen's English' like if she were completely charming to someone until she turned away and muttered to herself "one wishes you were not a complete and total bitch" because then you would have some build up before the punchline of "Queen says a swear word" plus passive aggressive humour just hits as more British to me personally.
I think there could have been a lot of potential if she were written like a Lucille Bluth, out of touch, unempathetic, and full of privilege. A joke like the iconic "How much could a banana cost? Ten dollars?" could have easily come from a royal in this show if the writers had any sense.
@@rodguy35 And they’d be at a table eating (because when are they not in this show) and everyone else would stop & she’d be like “Did I say something wrong?” And continue eating
I hate this Bigmouth-esque character design so much, it offends me on a personal level that someone actually thought for a moment that this looks like something that is aesthetically pleasing, its just ugly and gross.
Reminds me of RWBY and how the fan favorite was the one mute character. I saw people say that by being mute, it was harder for the writers to ruin her character via shit dialogue
The Queen joke would be funnier if she was posh most of the time but at one point snaps and catching everyone by surprise. Or when she's in her room alone she drops the charade
There's so much scope to make her a Jessica Walter style character. Someone like Lucille Bluth or Malorie Archer. Someone who puts on aires in public but when allowed to just be herself is a cynical, nasty, self absorbed woman who barely tolerates her dysfunctional family.
Hey, heard of ‚blatant, obvious, simple Solutions for big Problems’, covered in videotitles literally just saying those same words? Yeah, crazy-thing: turns out, solving Americas problem is real easy and literally: other Nations do things to problems they and America have and it helps them but America won’t do it. This Topic, as well as unbiased Analysis of various Issues like Economy and Homelessness and all such, was covered by RUclipsr Some More News...
I seem to remember that satirical portrayals of the Queen Mum (before her death) painted her as much more relaxed and rough around the edges than her daughter, and that combined with he caricature of the Queen in this show looking actually a lot like the Queen Mum is messing with my head.
According to the creators of Southpark, when writing a scene, every plot point must be connected by a "but" or a "therefore". If you have an "and then", you have a massive problem because the scene does not flow properly.
@@xenochris9713Sure. When writing a story or even a single scene, you have to have each point in the scene be connected otherwise it feels like a jumbled mess. So lets take this example: Two groups of people are meeting in a park with their animals. They get together and then their animals start fighting, therefore the groups are panicking , but one of them is ale to calm them down by using a whistle, therefore the fighting stops, and then another guy shows up and starts talking about a pet competition going on in the park, therefore the groups consider joining, but they don't know how to sign up, therefore the man explains, therefore they can sign up. Notice how that entire thing felt disconnected? You can easily split it into completely different sections that stand alone with no connection to the others. The groups meeting up, the animals fighting, and the guy talking about the competition. There's no connection between any single one of those points because the only connections are "and then this happened". When that is the case, its lousy writing because the audience feels the writer really wanted something new to happen without building up why it happened in the first place. Now lets redo that whole thing. Two groups are meeting in the park with their animals, but one of the people drops their sandwich on the ground, therefore a fight breaks out between the animals to get it and they run around the park, but one of the owners uses a dog whistle to calm them down, therefore the chase stops, but a man walks by saying he noticed the dogs running around the park doing tricks, therefore he offers them a place in the dog show, but the group isn't sure if they want to, therefore he mentions big prize money at the end, therefore they say they'll consider entering. The flowed better. Because every plot point in that scene had a connection to something that happened right before it. And it doesn't have to be immediate connections. It could be a connection set up three plot points ago someone later acknowledges, like the man noticing the animals doing tricks during the chase three plot points earlier.
@@xenochris9713 Its possible. Just look through it with another person. Critical feedback is great. I have my girlfriend look over my material all the time. Just in case something is off. She's not that much into writing but she constantly tries her best and is actually very helpful. Get someone who can always help you. I'd offer to buuuuut I don't think a youtube comment section is the best place for that. Just don't let doubt get in your way.
I had a teacher who's humor was very similar to this and I think it comes from a mental state of overthinking what humor is and even copying and paste all the wrong ways of doing it.
Real talk: Prince George is... like... A REAL PERSON! And he's literally a little kid! Why is this show "characterizing" an actual child as a vain, malicious twat?!?!?! Why are the show writers, producers, and directors BULLYING a real life kid?! This show is fucked.
Let's be real here, like every royal George is gonna grow up to be a spoiled twat. Anyone who lives in a fucking palace is guaranteed to have a superiority complex.
I feel like "the main characters trying to fake their way through a charity event they don't know anything about" as a premise has comedy potential. That could absolutely have been an episode of Seinfeld. You'd just have to, you know...write some jokes for it.
the thing that sucks is it would be so so so easy to make a good comedy about the royal family. including maybe making a running gag about how the kids are never around/on screen if you didn’t want to mock literal children
A good way for the two guard's joke to work is for them never talking, they would just be in the background constantly escalating. Maybe at first the guard who gets his head bumped might wear more collars, then maybe you see him with some super glue, then a metal brace built around his head. But nothing works, all building up to a murder mystery episode where the guy who gets his head bumped murders the other guy or maybe the other way around. The point is you can do a lot with this.
That’s actually really funny and would be so much fun to watch as the show progressed. How tf is someone on a RUclips comment section better at writing a running gag in just a few minutes than experienced comedy writers after months of development
True, but that would require actual effort from the writers. Why do all that when you could just use the same joke over and over and over and over and over again?
@@varsityreviews707 I just can't wrap my head around grown adults trying to justify bullying children. It's insane to me that someone can think they're the good guys doing that. Oh boy, I sure showed that 7 year old! The fuck.
@@kayrupe125 I know right. And then this kid is going to grow up bitter and resentful of everyone else because it could very well be that anyone he interacts with in the future could've been apart of or grew up with the people who made this show, not to mention, this will always be there just floating around for people to bully him about it.
I breathed air out of my nose imagining this. That would actually have some decent juxtaposition, portraying her as prude as she actually is but just having fucking horrible inner monologue. Would even work better for what they are trying to do, becouse then you can actually end up imagining the actual queen being prude but thinking otherwise.
Aside from the art being disgusting, it's just so obnoxiously disjointed. Why are half of the faces bizarre caricatures, while the other half are completely uninteresting? It's not like there's even a pattern to this, Prince Charles looking like a ghoul was a common enough joke that it makes sense on its own, but why does Prince William look like a boardwalk caricature? Why is the queen's face basically normal? I would honestly be fine with the disgusting caricatures if there was a pattern. If all the royals looked like caricatures, since y'know, they're inbred, while everyone else had normal faces, that would be kind of clever and a decent enough setup for humor. Instead there's just a few totally random characters with hideous faces, while everyone else has a normal face that's just done in a bad art style.
I normally don't care on ugly looking characters as long as their writing is good but I hate the way William looks to the point where I just get really angry about it.
Prince George does seem like an attempt at Stewie? Lots of pop culture references, attempts at meta humor, addressing the audience in a way? Plus English toddler
Even for someone who hates the monarchy, it feels really fucking weird to make the subject of your adult comedy a literal 8-year-old child who actually exists
Making fun at the monarchy can't go any further than lame faux rebellion in song lyrics. You know the kind of thing people can do on the side while people can pearl clutch over it. Not actual biting critique, that's disrespectful or something.
@@mattjk5299 what does that even mean. I'm all for criticism of the monarchy all I was saying was that making the subject of an adult comedy show a real 8 year old is uncomfortable. For me it has nothing to do w/ George being one of the Lizzy's heirs, it's just that he's a child.
I agree. There's actual nonces in the royal family and they keep away from that. Instead, they go after kids who aren't even old enough to have done anything worth satirising yet.
One of the moments I found funny was when the unhappy couple (whose names I can't be bothered to remember) have their butlers to do their argument. That honestly tickled my funny bone.
Another way the “Princess Charlotte is secretly a spy” gag could work is if she’s just really bad at it and she’s constantly almost blowing her cover BECAUSE SHE’S FIVE. Like, the humor of the bit was staring them right in the face. The kids don’t have to have adult personalities. Just write Charlotte like her real life age. The absurdity that the 5-year-old is the one who’s the spy practically writes itself
Not only white... This style of drawing people make everybody look bad. Indian guy telling spoilers is good example. It is visual equivalent of "insulting everyone makes you look like deep and intelligent person".
I admit I did get a chuckle out of a few things. 1.) Kate and William having their servants argue for them 2.) The Queen and Phillip thinking Oliver is a comedy 3.) The morlock bakers
My theory on this show: one day Peter Griffin walked into his living room and said "Hey Lois, remember that time the British Royal family was generally unpleasant?" And then this show punched its way into reality
These caricatures are fkin funny! I’d love to see the creators’ take on Mohammed, the prophet of the Muslim religion! They would absolutely kill if they had Mohammed fck the queen! 😂😂😂💀💀🗣️
Also the fact that they're an American studio trying to replicate British culture. In the one episode, most British people I know would rather blow their brains out than say the word "vacation". They use "holiday" over there guys
@trueblueprussian 23 how do you come to that conclusion? It's pretty obvious the writers just straight up don't understand anything about the royals or comedy above the most shallowest of understanding.
@trueblueprussian 23 Fuck it. I will go full commie because I just can't stand the "class envy" bullshit. All apes (humans included) instinctively understand things like fairness. Person a was born in a poor family - they won't get higher education simply because they were unlucky. Doesn't matter how brilliant their mind is, doesn't matter how much good they would bring to this world. Person b was born in a rich family - they'll achieve success no matter how pitful they are. Mummy and daddy's money will cover all losses I know it's shocking but we can recognize that this system is wrong. It's not class envy when you see again and again rich people getting away with pedophilia when the poor are being thrown into prisons for the things they can't even control Everytime I see someone commenting about "class envy" I get closer to being a fucking commie. And I was raised in a country ruled by Soviets Congrats comrade, thank you for your contribution in this discourse. Maybe it's time for praxis
Fun fact: the Queen used to be an auto mechanic during the war. Up until she died, she would fix her car herself whenever it broke down. Why didn't this ever get referenced on the Prince? The image of this extremely old and posh royal jacking up a car and getting oil and transmission fluid all over her fluffy dress could have been funny.
@@natm5005 Oh come on Stewie is hilairous. Remember when he tried to Mind Control Chris. I was dying. Especially when the mind control device malfunctioned and Chris went after him.
When Family Guy is art in comparison something has gone SO WRONG. But no lie, I can still chuckle at family guy as bad as it gets. But hot damn these new "aimed at adults" animated shows are GAAAAARBAGE.
These “adult shows” are just called adult show because they say fuck and show nasties, and that’s…sad. There’s an unfair amount of garbage that gets put on in comparison to the actual good stuff. Obviously many times there has been made the point that even kids shows are more mature.
I laughed at loud at folders labeled "DOCUMENTS" Also, they make a joke about how much it sucks when someone spoils things for you...by spoiling GOT for the audience...why couldn't they have just made up a show?
The only joke you showed that made me catch my breath in an almost laugh was actually Charlotte pacing on the phone and George going "wait a minute" and it panning back to her suddenly having a full tea party going. I think it operated on the same logic that the old man catching fire worked on you. In that it didn't but the sudden slightly unexpected moment of it almost tricked me into a laugh. And then I did laugh at how hard it had tried to get me to laugh
I sorta hate that it’s based on real kids lol. Maybe it’s just me overthinking it but I can’t help but to associate a lot of the show to the real family (somehow) lmao. If this was my own kids I could still laugh I think but the fact idiots in the world still see this as a documentary, you get spin off lies that kates son is gay or his brother is a super weirdo. My husband and I were like where did they get the ideas for the personalities of these kids ?!
There's a video on political cartoons on a channel called "Thought Slime". Taking apart why they're so bad. It's the newest or second-newest video on the channel.
Once in a blue moon, but yes. My personal take on why they're so dead and dry, because the artist is pushing a personal bias HARD and no matter your leaning, that push is clear and transparent as hell and sucks the humor out of it. It takes a skilled cartoonist to make a good political cartoon. And also *why the fuck do they feel this need to label everything let us infer shit we ain't stupid*
For me the whole “prince Philip died right before this came out and the jokes are still just kinda in there” is the energy I get from the show as a whole. This show is about real people and it fails at actual satire, so it feels like they’re just taking real people and shitting all over them for no point. Especially considering two of the main foci of the show are literal real life minors who have no say in their family.
@@notaspider4084 Well, if you’re gonna take a crap on real people, at least do it well (ahem, Spitting Image). Also… just because an eight year old has a lot of money doesn’t mean it’s okay to make of them. They’re still an eight year old. Base the show on Charles. At least then you can claim more of a moral high ground. And it might be entertaining.
@@notaspider4084 don't say that like it's ok to make fun of a fucking child lol that is literally an eight year old. just because it happens to be born into a rich ass family doesn't mean it should be given unfair, uncalled for treatment. bullying a fucking minor before it can even read properly... you're literally just raising bad people at that point. i was born into a family of nothing, but that gives me no right to belittle a child that was raised with everything. that is still a child-a baby. you're disappointing. i'm all for shitting on shit royals, but not when that royal is a child who isn't an adult and/or a piece of garbage
17:19 Camilla never talking is a running joke they stole from Star Trek. There is a background character named Mohn who never does anything but sitting in Quark's bar, probably because his costume does not even allow him to talk. But whenever someone is talking about Mohn, they do like he was the most exciting man in the universe.
That's neat! And also plays into well of the actual history between the Queen and Camilla. I thought the joke was clever, and also non offensive for anyone familiar too.
for real, a lot modern children cartoons have so good writing and visual storytelling that they genuinely appeal to adult audiences as well. Crap like this on the other hand doesn’t even try to be art on any existential level. It doesn’t tell a story, it’s not pretty, and fails miserably at the one thing it tries to do, being funny. I can name half a dozen children’s cartoons from the top of my head who do all that successfully and are appealing to adults as well as genuinely valuable for children.
The Queen doesn't even sound like an angry british woman, she sounds like an american trying to do a angry british woman impression. What's the point of that.
I dont understand how they fucked this up, because Frances de la Tour is literally an old british woman. Why does she sound like a bad impression of one?
The "Princess Charlotte is a spy" joke could've been *hilarious* if she still acted and spoke like a little girl. Or at least funnier than it actually is.
Might I also add that this show is EXTREMELY unpleasant to look at? There is literally no cohesion whatsoever to the visual design of the characters. The shapes, the coloration, even the line work of each character all look different. It's not just that the show has an unpleasant design. I consider the weird long upper lip the Simpson's characters have to be unpleasant. But at least all the Simpson's characters have some variation of that same design. Contrast that to this show, where everybody's mouth is shaped completely differently. Princess Charlotte's mouth has a more front-facing design, but Queen Elizabeth's mouth hangs off to the side. I don't like how the Simpson's characters have pure yellow skin either. But at least they ALL have yellow skin, so my eyes can get used to it. Prince Charles has the entire spectrum of the color red on his face, while Prince George has only one shade of pasty white. A lot of adult animations have designs that are either lazy or ugly, but this one's is both unbelievably sloppy and downright revolting at the same time. Even if it were made like this intentionally, it doesn't matter. Actually, that would make this even worse as a creative decision. This design doesn't make me want to laugh, it makes me want to vomit. Given that the writers couldn't tell the difference between gross-out humor and just grossness, I wouldn't be surprised if the art team had a similar predicament. Sorry about the long rant, just had to get this off my chest. Thank you for coming to my Ted talk.
That's how I always felt with a lot of other shows such as Big Mouth or Paradise PD. Also I fucking hate princess charlotte's weird frowny rectangle mouth.
If you want the reason all adult animated rows look that way it’s because they use 2D animated rigs which are cheaper to animate than hand-drawn animation. Very limited animation and cheaper to produce.
In a lot of movies/shows, what they try to do is make the main character appear as 'human.' They'll be the most pleasant to look at, the most relatable. While other characters will be more exaggerated. (For instance, Hotel Transylvania, Mavis is the most human like, while Count Dracula is thin and exaggerated.) This is to help create a bond between the main character and the audience. I can see where they came from from that perspective, but damn, they failed hard.
The Prince was probably written to be a laughtrack sitcom, but they forgot to add the laugh tracks because, upon seeing the final product, the writers themselves weren't sure which part was supposed to be the joke after the fact.
The dumbest thing is that, like, SNL did the whole "what if the Queen was actually the opposite of posh" bit with Fred Armisen and it was hilarious. And if SNL can do it, then it's not exactly a hard bit to pull off.
@@tjenadonn6158 To be fair it depends on the writers and who's doing what in the sketches. Lots of talented people who can actually make really great sketches, but some just fall flat or aren't funny.
Also, if SNL already did it (FKING ELEVEN YEARS AGO) maybe you need to add something to the joke to justify its existence. But it actually seems like they detracted from it. In the SNL sketch, at first you see the queen and she's all nice and polite, and then when they're left alone, she reveals her true, cockney nature. From this video at least it seems like The Prince skipped all that, and just had her rude and abrasive all of the time, so there's no contrast even.
PAINFUL aint even a Word anymore! I died, became a Ghost-Pokemon, fell in Love with a Fire-Pokemon and now we're running-away CAUSE OF OUTGROUP-BIASED of Both Species!!! !? ...And? How was your day meanwhile?
If I had a nickel for every time some media portrays Queen Elizabeth as short tempered and quick to anger, I'd have 2 nickels. Which is not much, but it's weird that it happened twice.
That might literally be the only way it could be seen as funny; the absurd physical humor only possible in cartoons, like Wile E. Coyote painting a tunnel onto a rock face and the Road Runner running through it.
If they didn't call it out everytime and just left it, I think it'd actually be funnier Edit: Yeah, when he shows the three clips back to back to back without the "punchlines," it is actually funnier 😂
Also, maybe this is a stereotype, whereas I'm a stupid American. But aren't members of The Queen's Guard supposed to be silent? Even if that's a stereotype, I feel like that could be combined with the hat gag to great effect.
i wouldn’t mind this show as much if they focused it more around the adult members of the royal family with the kids making occasional appearances, but instead they decided to construct entire personalities for children who aren’t even old enough to watch the show. i don’t mind making fun of rich monarchs every now and again, but basing an entire adult animated show on a living, breathing child who just happened to be born into wealth is just creepy, man
Yeah, I think that if they wanted to make a satire revolving around a young prince, they either should've invented an entirely new fictional royal family, (like The Royals did) or made Will or Harry into children again. (Like what Lil' Bush did with George W. Bush.)
I feel like the Queen's gag of being rude and obnoxious in contradiction to her real life character would be better if they did the opposite. Exaggerate her highness's poshness.
Make her extremely posh, with weird rules, slowly add supernatural rules like she has to be invited places to enter and make the dated "the queen is immortal" joke work Its not rocket science
I love the comment sections on reviews of shitty adult animated shows, just filled with people coming up with better executions for the jokes in the series.
Or even just have her vulgar mouth contrast her high class attitude. Make so despite what she says, she's one of the most well managed characters in the show.
The gag about the word “episode” being spelled progressively worse throughout the charlotte joke compilation was genuinely funnier than this entire show
impossible. name a single adult animated show that is unfunny. its literally the pinnacle of comedy every time its executed. like blackberry and tacoma f.d and scoops, the adult animated show about a funny haha lacrosse coach
The main issue is that they're making a caricature of a real child too, this is just gonna be a big point for bullying one day. Why couldn't they have gone the sensible route and just made a fictional kid like Bart or Stewie, or whatever?
@@tentacledood5784 Imagine if the show focused on a family of one of the royal guards, with Prince George being friends with the fictional child. He could've been realistic to contrast the character that is actually being made fun of, kinda like Chris from the show Dan vs
Yeah I'm trying to imagine finding out there's an animated TV Show that has a main character that looks like me and has my name and is like, literally me. Now I'm imagining that when I was 8...What. The. Fuck. I didn't choose my parents nor what house I grew up in. It's disgusting that this family is allowed to FORCE a child to be alive, and have this all made and done without his consent, yet "it's okay" because...why? Rich? "Royal?" his parents forced him to be in the public eye. Fuck this, I'm relieved I'm not born in this family.
Ok, so I've been thinking about this for SEVERAL days now, and I think I finally get the Demi Lovado thing. The joke is that most of these sorts of animated adult "comedies" are written by conservatives, so when the subject of Demi Lovado being nonbinary comes up, we, the audience, are expecting something offensive or transphobic. But it never happens, Prince George is totally nonchalant about the whole thing, and I guess that does count as a subversion of expectations, but just barely, and if I'm being honest, even that seems like a reach. I don't really have any other explanation for this, though, so that's the best I can come up with.
Without having seen the show, I think saying Elizabeth has been queen "for more than 10 years" is funnier than the entirety of the show even if you were high.
Kids shows have always been more mature. Remember sonic says? The targeted demographic for that show was for adults who come home from a hard work day.
You know, that "running gag" hat bump thing you showed in the beginning is even worse than you mentioned, because it only "functions" at all because the characters are 2d. The way they're standing, they're supposed to be next to each other, and when they bow their heads, they're supposed to be bowing forward. If it weren't an animated show, with the characters drawn at a side angle, the one guy would have to lean his head TO THE SIDE in order to bump the other guy, and thus wouldn't be able to "accidentally" bump him.
It’s wild they give those two characters a whole “arc” or at least I think that’s what they want it to be lol. They sing together and one remembers the others bday after being annoyed wit the pointless hat thing! Which makes me think he had a crush and bumped his hat on purpose but like why the fuck do I care cause I don’t?!
@@overlordtealover1128 his point is that the graduates are high fiving each other on merit of successfully peddling their hogwash to whoever green lights these shows.
what i hate is that 99% of the jokes aren't even able to be discerned as jokes unless you think about it and that 1% of jokes that are kinda something seem way funnier than they are bc of that
Weirdly, the bumping-hats joke would’ve been funnier if they just never addressed it. Two background characters that don’t speak but are always bumping hats when they bow. It’s still not “funny”, but still an improvement with less effort.
Consider: Every time it happens you can visibly see the guy who gets bumped slowly get more and more irritated with every bump to the point that he's biting back rage. It culminates in a murder 'mystery' season finale where the bumping-guard is found dead. The audience knows whodunit, so it would be the dramatic irony of all the main charaters accusing one another that would make it funny/tense.
The worst part is - minus the fact that this will always exist - is that you could probably fix a lot of the comedy simply by making all the characters act perfect in public and then like they do in the show behind closed doors. It wouldn't necessarily make the show _funny_ but there would be some comedy, at least.
In a way I think it's what the Writers were thinking this show was except they completely forgot to put that in the show because they expected everyone to watch the show with the same mentality as them, like they just took it for granted that the joke is these people act perfect in public and didn't even bother to show it, they thought real life was enough
Alternatively, make the main characters be the servants, cooks, cleaners, etc - generate comedy through the idea of them having to deal with this horde of rude assholes who don't understand or appreciate their underlings. Make a poignant commentary on the way royal power turns people into inhuman monsters by writing the lower caste people as functional, 3D characters while the royals are these warped caricatures
Precisely. If the joke is the juxtaposition between what we perceive the Royal Family as and what they "actually" are like then *make it part of the show*.
I’m pretty sure the “joke” about not knowing what the charity event is for is that they don’t know what it is for, as in “they don’t really care about the charity, it is just for good PR”. So more a critique of the elites that do countless charity events without actually caring.
Exactly what I’ve been thinking. I’d write a show about a young prince that slowly grows to realize that a lot of royal life is toxic, and becoming a better person that any of his predecessors.
@@Methus3lah no it should be about a young prince, who grows up to think that he is a better person than any of his predecessors, but he just exerts control over people in a new or different way that’s more insidious than the explicit toxicity of his predecessors
They could have had the joke be that her servants don't know what "that little thing I like to eat" is and she attempts to describe it and does a bad job and everyone just gets more confused until it turns out that it's something super common and easy to remember. Or there could be wacky hijinks surrounding them trying to figure out what that thing is without alerting her to the fact that they have no idea what she's talking about. There are so many possible ways to make that funny and they did none of them.
Worst part is even if it was, they swear so often you're already numb to it, so it's just like an awkward silence while the show stares at you like "....so..? any thoughts on that?" and it's like... any thoughts on what? it's the millionth swearword so far
They swear all the time in South Park, but that’s never the joke, it is just natural, except for the episode that was meant to show that swear words are just words.
I think the most telling thing about this show is how transparently they're trying to make Prince George sound like Stewie Griffin. This is clearly somebody trying to blatantly rip off Family Guy (but in Britain! With royalty! Get it?!) whilst also horribly misunderstanding exactly WHY Family Guy worked as a show in the first place.
Instead of trying to copy the first couple seasons of Family Guy they're trying to copy current Family Guy. Like, why, we already have a shitty version of Family Guy. It's called Family Guy.
The worst part of this show is that an animated satire of the royal family actually could be a great show if executed right and with the actual knowledge of British royalty and the shit around it being used in the writing rather than "haha shitty poop mean words bad person hahaha"
Personally what rubs me the wrong way is the fact that they made the main characters of the show real kids, and actively making fun of them. Poke fun at adult celebrities all you want, but leave the children out of it. They also don't include Andrew which is HILARIOUS. They don't make fun of the alleged predator but they have no issue bullying kids.
Sweden actually had a show like that back in 2004 called "Hey Baberiba", that satirized the Swedish royal family (though it was live-action, not animated). They didn't work any royal kids into the jokes so it was also in well taste.
I think the "Gorgenstein's" gag is about celebrities doing charities for things they know nothing about to maintain their image, but it's not presented well.
Yeah, that's what I thought too. Arrested Development did that same gag by having their characters go to charity events whose causes were directly at odds with each other, which was more clever, much more subtle, and actually was funny. There is an idea for a joke there, it just was executed really poorly.
Brass Eye did it far better in the '90s, having real celebrities and MPs do things like make anti-drug PSAs about fictional drugs and getting them to campaign on behalf of an elephant that shoved it's head up it's anus. They even roped Phil Collins into one of their schemes, getting him to make a promo for a fictional pedophilia awareness group called Nonce Sense. Later on the guys behind it, mainly the duo of Armando Iannucci and Chris Morris, went on to make shows like The Thick of It and Veep, which are some of the few pieces of explicitly political comedy that have managed to stay funny after their zeitgeist has passed.
@@kylejones8289 Arrested Development also did the joke better in S3, when in flashback we find out that they raised a lot of money for TBD, as well as later in the episode where they run a fundraiser for Tobias's body rejecting his hair plugs. It does kinda feel like bullying to compare this poorly thought out piece of shit to Arrested Development.
Watching this analysis, I kept thinking about how Arrested Development has the type of humor this show is going for, but actually makes it funny with a satisfying payoff.
If it's really true that this is just meant to be a pseudo Stewie Griffin spinoff, then i can see the logic that went behind Charlotte's spy scenes: Stewie's character isn't just "Sassy gay child". He's also a genius mad scientist. As a result, a good chunk of his episodes involve him going on some sci-fi adventure involving his inventions. Charlotte is meant to tick that box by being a spy with spy gadgets.
A running gag needs to like, escalate, or change, or be a small part of another skit. Like I could see it being funny if they keep bumping hats *despite trying not to* once they know it's a problem. Like they try to stand further apart; still bump hats, dammit. Or try to avoid bumping hats and to it anyway in a parody of that little dance people do when trying not to run into each other... but with hats. Culminating in true absurdity, like a strong wind blows one's hat off, across the doorway, into the other guys. Doing the same bit, three times, with almost no change, a the "highlight" of a scene, is like the opposite of how to do a running gag.
and if they wouldn't acknowledge it every time, there might be some comedy to it. a background bump that doesn't draw attention for the first two times, with a quiet "stop" on the third, would feel like there was some nuance within the joke. either going full-blown absurd or keeping it mellow might work; they instead chose the worst of both worlds.
like in monty python, "and now for something completely different" guy he starts in an office, then he's in the woods, and i havent watched all of it yet but so far his most exaggerated appearance is one where he's sitting at his desk, up to his chest in water
Why are "adult" animated shows more immature and gross compared to most kid shows? Family Guy (early seasons), The Simpsons, Futurama and some others I don't know of were good because they didn't rely on cringe, gross-out humour, constant swearing and making outdated references (well, early Family Guy didn't).
Believe it or not the kid show viewers (the older ones( despise gross humor. If Only really little kids would watch them(if they also have colourful charecters and are loud that is)). The most despised kids shows are the gross ones. You're not gonna get the money from the teens and adults who still watch kids cartoons. It's rare that they succeed even tho some have. Plus the current creators are more interested in telling a story they've always wanted to see done before. Emphasis on STORY. They use the 'kids' title as an excuse to show that story. The fandom has people from every age group so it needs to be liked by everyone and as said before not all age groups like those stuff. And or just to entertain really really young kids. That stuff needs to be extremely family friendly but also calming or educational. Parents would explode otherwise. Ofcourse this ones can have gross jokes like puking or farting but they can't go as far as some adult cartoons.
Bojack Horseman is another good example of an adult animated show that has good humor and doesnt rely on crude humor to do it, not to mention complex characters that get more than one or two episodes to themselves to really dive into who they are
@@mortimer687 Funny thing is I've heard rumours that Gumball was originally pitched to Adult Cartoon networks but they wouldn't accept it because it was "Too colorful" or some bullcrap like that.
@@aperson4287 It was supposed to be an adult swim show about reject cartoon charecters going too a remedical school but it was changed later. Oddly enough the reject charecter plot line came back in the later seasons as a dimention were useless forgotten charecters got sent
8:41 WHO LABELS DOCUMENTS TOP SECRET AND THEN STAMPS A BIG RED MARK TO SAY THEYRE DOCUMENTS. Looks like an animator got the words the wrong way round. Also the labels switch sides from right to left after two just in case you thought the top secrets under would not be document.
Lets admit we didnt support Constructive Criticism (and Humor itself) enough, so we let all this Happen. So let support the s-it out of Jay Excis hour-long video on Doctor Who, just like Madvocate and Hbomberguy did for other Franchises. Is that sometrhing we can all get behind?
As an artist, its not hard to tell theres atleast _four_ fucking different artstyles going on at the same time. You have butt-ugly old, a style clearly seen on butlers, the queen, and her husband. They either have negative chin, or 100% chin. You have child, a fairly standard adult animated styled kid, except with a larger than normal head. You have women, and I say women because _all of them are goddamn bobble-headed Bratz dolls._ They are nearly the exact same proportions as the child but _stretched_ upwards, not scaled, stretched. Their ears extend to the ends of their shoulders, and its _way too fucking big for their dainty necks._ Then lastly you have tallheads, Prince William and Prince Henry are both examples, people with extremely tall and thin heads, and tiny eyes. *_None_* of these are styles fit together. Its not comprised in a way that gives everyone a unique art style either, theres clearly similarities between _some_ characters, but with no pattern. Its an inconsistent style that makes characters look very out of place in diverse shots. In the dinner table room, it looks like a Bratz episode being photobombed by a political cartoon and Mr Pickles. Its horrible to look at.
It's truly amazing. That running "gag" with the the one guards' hat hitting the other guards' hat would've worked if he *didn't* acknowledge it. It wouldn't have exactly been comedy gold, but it would've worked. How could they screw up such an easy joke!? Also, the way the princess's mouth is drawn really...pisses me off and I don't know why. It's like everything about this show is designed to be as insulting and annoying as possible.
Imagine if the guards where just acted like statues they just stare blankly at the characters and instead of having them walk they leave the scene via a quick blackout and when lights come back on their just not there
I feel the same way about the spy gag, if prince george didn’t continue to point out “hey something’s up here” basically explaining the joke it might’ve been a bit more funny
They just never acknowledge it but it keeps happening and making the scene awkward each time and the last time it happens you just see the guy in the background hit him in the face like "STOP IT!"
I think what probably seems the strangest thing to me about the show is how the main character is a real person who's a real child. Like it's one thing to make satire of adults for the decisions that they make, but it just seems kind of messed up how the focus is on the kids as well. I don't want to say that it's like bullying children, but I also don't think a show like this is good for the actual royal children since it already shapes how others perceive them. Idk, maybe I'm just thinking too much about it
I'm 100% with you. The very first time I heard about this show, my reaction was "What kind of heartless person makes mocking satire out of an actual child?" My opinion hasn't changed.
Eh, it seems to me that the children aren't the target, they're moreso the "eyes" through which we see the world. Plus, they're all insanely rich and the family is a joke in real life, being an outdated and useless group of people, so who really cares. The kids will never know anything resembling a bad day, and since it doesn't exactly seem to mock or target them, I don't see the big deal. I don't think it's a great plan, but if it had been actually funny, it wouldn't have bothered me. That being said, if it actually targeted or vindictively mocked the children themselves, I might be more on your side. They just don't seem like the target here.
@@d3rrick10493 "Plus, they're all insanely rich and the family is a joke in real life, being an outdated and useless group of people, so who really cares." So it's fine because they are rich. Yet celebs sons and daughters are richer. They are apparently a joke in real life to you. How so?
@@d3rrick10493 What is so funny about being forced into slavery from birth? I really want to know. Because that's what they are. They don't have the same rights as us British citizens. They have less. They are forced into a position due to the bloodline. And how our government works. They can't vote. They can't give a political opinion. They are forced to be ambassadors for our country and forced to be icons of culture for us Brits. As a British person, I want to know the joke.
What needs to happen is that they make another one of these shows, with obvious Rick and Morty art inspiration, lazy humor, the works. But by the end of the 2nd episode, things start to derail, and the genre shifts. Horror, existential drama, anything.
@@TheNDofUO This is definitely where the stupid "Charlotte is a spy" gag came from. They were desperately grasping for something funny... sorry something "funny"... to do with a rreal life 6 year old girl that wouldn't make the writers seem like creepy ghouls
honestly this is probably the least of things he'll have to worry about once he's old enough to find it. still fucked up though that they thought this was okay from HBOs side.
I don't care that he's a public figure, this is a TV show made about a real life child without his or his parents consent, and it portrays him as a twat. I'm not comfortable with this show
same, it's weird there's a whole ass show mocking real people. i don't really care about the british monarchy (although i do agree that it's stupid they chose to depict a child like that) but the whole concept of that is weird.
This show genuinely be like “haha queen say fuck, now laugh”.
Seems there's a thing with shows thinking swearing = funny.
Yeah like RUclipsr thought like always being loud and anxious equal funny.
You know what could do with the queen swearing.When the queen near with kids she use friendly language like Fudge or heck and when their no kids around she swear.That could’ve been a nice detail to add instead people think it’s funny that kids swear.
@@nostoevsky I mean... depends
@@ttb8932 At the right moment, yes, but if it's repetitive it won't be funny.
How did they have that "hat bumb" joke, and not escalate it to a whole line of troops like dominos? How did they not have an "anti joke" where the soldiers finally get it right and avoid bumping heads, just to them fuck up something else even more important? How did they not have one where one soldier fills his hat with something heavy, so the guy doing the bumping gets hurt instead?
These comedy shows need a god damn writers room.
I genuinely can’t understand how the writers for these shows think that anything they make will be remotely funny. It’s like they’re aliens or something
I loved everything you said.
@@Fruityfruitcat Your comment made me imagine a pair of aliens on Earth trying to make a living by attempting to write human comedy.
Somehow, this childish thought was way more funny than anything in the actual comedy.
it's baffling how the someone can do the same joke like 4 times and nowhere think "hm MAAAYBE i could add a twist"
They could have had them never bring it up until the one time they don’t bump each other and then one congratulates the other about not messing up the bow only for something else to go wrong.
The hat joke would probably be funnier if the other guy just didn't say anything, and was just resigned to this annoying thing because of how soulless his job is, and the extent to which the other guy is getting knocked over gets more and more insane
Wow, an actual joke that with good enough execution could have been the funniest thing in the whole series. Such a shame that paid writers are literally worse than the average 13 year old.
Another way of improving it could have been to adapt the time-honored "switcheroo" gag, where after being subjected to the hat bump a few times, the guard tries to circumvent it happening again, say by switching around where they're standing only to have his hat bumped the other way when the other guard straightens back from the head-nod. This could then escalate into more convoluted means of avoiding getting his hat bumped, only for the attempts to go poorly for him.
amazing idea. literally something as simple as having the guy who typically gets hit accidentally hit the ‘hitter’ and have the hitter get super pissed. anything could have improved the gag because it literally had no punch line lol
One scene is so badly animated that it could be part of a horror movie @7:56 no joke that kid teleporting in on the left scared the crap out of me
That's exactly what I was thinking. Just have him say nothing, then have him react at the end. At the very least the "stop" would've been funnier, but you could've had him just straight up tackle the other guy in the background.
“It’s adult because it has *sex refrences* and *swears* and, god forbid, *gross things* “- The creators of these shows apparently
Ah yes, an 11 year old's idea of adult entertainment.
@@KasumiRINA convinced all “adult animated comedy” writers are just twelve year old boys
@@GuitarTory at heart, maybe. For South Park it worked, the fact that writers are manchildren gave it charm tbh.
@@KasumiRINA I think after SP everyone went “This did well, let’s copy it” and it just didn’t work out for them.
@@GuitarTory that's also one thing some people don't get in appeal of anime: it's not treating its audience like morons or thinks immature = edgy... Compare Berserk or Sayonara Zetsubou Sensei to Family Guy ffs.
From western "adult" animation I liked Metalocalypse. It was great! Futurama also decent. Then there's the edgelords... Oh and Xavier Renegade Angel seems interesting, makes me think of Kuuchuu Buranko.
The royal guard hats being pineapples in the vacation scene is unironically a better joke than any of the actual jokes written into the script.
Inwas thinking exactly the same thing when that scene came up.
One of the few intentionally funny things to have ever happened in the show.
When background characters outfits are funnier than the...”comedy” in the scene
I was gonna say that unless they made a big deal of pointing out the hats in the real show
Love that
These " adult " animated shows aren't for adults they're actually targeted for 13 year olds because no one seems to understand what makes an adults animated show funny to adults
no teen would actually enjoy this though unlike shows like family guy there's not an audience for this type of show at least family guy goes all out so there's the facade of comedy
Any thirteen year old I know would hate this show as much as you do. I would say "no one seems to understand what makes an adults animated show funny."
Futurama; an actual adult cartoon
@@classicallycommie6266 you're overestimating the typical teen lol
@@sadagusfate
Knowing teens that hate those shows and love them (separate individuals), I'd agree that average teens are overestimated lol
I don't know if I've ever been more deadpan at a joke.
Like, I didn't cringe, but I expressed no emotion.
This series must be soul-sucking to watch.
It is.
It's honestly painful to watch. Like, paradise police was... Eh. Cringy, but good as background noise with the occasional chuckle at how stupid it was.
This one was like grating a blackboard for fun
They are like Blanks from Warhammer 40k.
Tryg: it is. I managed to get half way thru it, and I just quit. I made it thru 1 season of the PD cartoon, no problem (tho it sucked half way thru it’s 2nd season.) Usually I develop a “awwww hell, I don’t like to quit” mentality on multiple season shows. (A non-cartoon: Happy Endings, beat me. But I figured it’s not a cartoon…). Yeah I’m an idiot
i laughed more at this comment than I did to any of the jokes from the show in this video.
Same bruh its not even funny how unfunny it is💀I could even do better
Something I will _never_ understand about adult animation is, why are the designs all so ugly? I'm pretty sure being an adult doesn't mean we don't like good designs.
A lot of people still think cartoons are for children. So when they try to make adult cartoons, it probably fries their brain on how so they settle for making everything look ugly because cute and appealing is for children.
half the characters look like Meat Canyon drew them and the other half look like bitmojis
@@nicky23anims68I feel as if I read this before
@@Misterlongo170 idk i forgor
Isn't it? they all look the same... they all (try to) look like family guy, but worse somehow.
I think these adult comedy cartoons have mistakenly equated “shock” with “comedy” in the same way American horror movies in the 2000’s mistook “gross” with “scary”.
this show specifically is beyond that. its like they decided to write an outline for an episode with all the description of "this happens" and forgot to add anything else
And even then, it's not particularly shocking when the queen says 'fuck' for the 20th time.
or like how horror games think jumpscares = terror
And confusing shock with horror.
Well gross-out is a type of fear according to Stephen King, but not all gross-out moments are done well, just like not all “shock” moments are done well. There has to be setup
I think a funnier take on the Queen would be if she were more passive aggressive and still spoke in 'the Queen's English' like if she were completely charming to someone until she turned away and muttered to herself "one wishes you were not a complete and total bitch" because then you would have some build up before the punchline of "Queen says a swear word" plus passive aggressive humour just hits as more British to me personally.
I think there could have been a lot of potential if she were written like a Lucille Bluth, out of touch, unempathetic, and full of privilege. A joke like the iconic "How much could a banana cost? Ten dollars?" could have easily come from a royal in this show if the writers had any sense.
Or senile enough to drop an occasionally crass or bigoted remark, without warning. Something like: “Harry are you still dating that colored girl”
That would require far too much thought from the writers
that would have been really funny
@@rodguy35 And they’d be at a table eating (because when are they not in this show) and everyone else would stop & she’d be like “Did I say something wrong?” And continue eating
I hate this Bigmouth-esque character design so much, it offends me on a personal level that someone actually thought for a moment that this looks like something that is aesthetically pleasing, its just ugly and gross.
All the CalArts kids grew up into this shit.
I'm quite certain "ugly and gross" was exactly what they were going for.
I blame Seth McFarlane.
Somehow you put into words exactly how I feel about looking at this. The overly caricatured decaying old man is genuinely repulsive.
@@PandaPelley
calarts has nothing to do with it what are you talking about
Camilla not speaking makes her instantly the funniest character in the show
Reminds me of RWBY and how the fan favorite was the one mute character. I saw people say that by being mute, it was harder for the writers to ruin her character via shit dialogue
@@littlebluecloversand they still fumbled that, amazing
@@alibekzholaman2923truly an incredible achievement
The Queen joke would be funnier if she was posh most of the time but at one point snaps and catching everyone by surprise. Or when she's in her room alone she drops the charade
Worked for Mom in Futurama
literally the joke from fred armisen’s queen sketches on snl lol
There's so much scope to make her a Jessica Walter style character. Someone like Lucille Bluth or Malorie Archer. Someone who puts on aires in public but when allowed to just be herself is a cynical, nasty, self absorbed woman who barely tolerates her dysfunctional family.
Something Futurama figured out with Mom 20 years ago lmao
@@DragonNexus yea but that would be incredibly unoriginal.
I feel like the Queen saying "You sound like a fucking idiot" could've worked if the Queen was passive agressive rather than actively agressive.
Hey, heard of ‚blatant, obvious, simple Solutions for big Problems’, covered in videotitles literally just saying those same words?
Yeah, crazy-thing: turns out, solving Americas problem is real easy and literally:
other Nations do things to problems they and America have and it helps them but America won’t do it.
This Topic, as well as unbiased Analysis of various Issues like Economy and Homelessness and all such, was covered by RUclipsr Some More News...
@@nenmaster5218 unfortunately, America cares more for its businesses and ther profits rather than their people.
Speaking as an american.
to be fair, i still giggle at her shouting 'I will fuck you up, girlie"
I seem to remember that satirical portrayals of the Queen Mum (before her death) painted her as much more relaxed and rough around the edges than her daughter, and that combined with he caricature of the Queen in this show looking actually a lot like the Queen Mum is messing with my head.
@pentelegomenon Spitting Image?
According to the creators of Southpark, when writing a scene, every plot point must be connected by a "but" or a "therefore". If you have an "and then", you have a massive problem because the scene does not flow properly.
That's... A fantastic writing trick, thank you.
I don't quite understand, could you explain if that's okay? (I'm a writer so this could help a LOT)
@@xenochris9713Sure. When writing a story or even a single scene, you have to have each point in the scene be connected otherwise it feels like a jumbled mess.
So lets take this example: Two groups of people are meeting in a park with their animals. They get together and then their animals start fighting, therefore the groups are panicking , but one of them is ale to calm them down by using a whistle, therefore the fighting stops, and then another guy shows up and starts talking about a pet competition going on in the park, therefore the groups consider joining, but they don't know how to sign up, therefore the man explains, therefore they can sign up.
Notice how that entire thing felt disconnected? You can easily split it into completely different sections that stand alone with no connection to the others. The groups meeting up, the animals fighting, and the guy talking about the competition. There's no connection between any single one of those points because the only connections are "and then this happened". When that is the case, its lousy writing because the audience feels the writer really wanted something new to happen without building up why it happened in the first place.
Now lets redo that whole thing.
Two groups are meeting in the park with their animals, but one of the people drops their sandwich on the ground, therefore a fight breaks out between the animals to get it and they run around the park, but one of the owners uses a dog whistle to calm them down, therefore the chase stops, but a man walks by saying he noticed the dogs running around the park doing tricks, therefore he offers them a place in the dog show, but the group isn't sure if they want to, therefore he mentions big prize money at the end, therefore they say they'll consider entering.
The flowed better. Because every plot point in that scene had a connection to something that happened right before it. And it doesn't have to be immediate connections. It could be a connection set up three plot points ago someone later acknowledges, like the man noticing the animals doing tricks during the chase three plot points earlier.
@@nebulousprime THANK YOU!
Now I'm worried though, I feel as if that kind of stuff may be in my own story now 💀
@@xenochris9713 Its possible. Just look through it with another person. Critical feedback is great. I have my girlfriend look over my material all the time. Just in case something is off. She's not that much into writing but she constantly tries her best and is actually very helpful. Get someone who can always help you. I'd offer to buuuuut I don't think a youtube comment section is the best place for that. Just don't let doubt get in your way.
It feels like if you forced an AI to watch all of Family Guy and then gave it a prompt to write a comedy cartoon about the British Royal Family.
i feel like adult humor is morphing into kids humor but with swears
I had a teacher who's humor was very similar to this and I think it comes from a mental state of overthinking what humor is and even copying and paste all the wrong ways of doing it.
So... kids humor
Waddya mean morphing? Feels like this has been the case for a long while
🌎 👩🚀🔫👩🚀
It’s like an old bad newgrounds animation
Real talk: Prince George is... like... A REAL PERSON! And he's literally a little kid!
Why is this show "characterizing" an actual child as a vain, malicious twat?!?!?!
Why are the show writers, producers, and directors BULLYING a real life kid?! This show is fucked.
Because wouldn't it be funny to have a British Stewie Griffin?
@@oliverp3545 He already has a British accent
Let's be real here, like every royal George is gonna grow up to be a spoiled twat. Anyone who lives in a fucking palace is guaranteed to have a superiority complex.
@@TheGloriousLobsterEmperor Princess Mako from Japan wasn't
Married a 'commoner'
Very sweet story
@@walter4180 She's still fucking royalty.
I feel like "the main characters trying to fake their way through a charity event they don't know anything about" as a premise has comedy potential. That could absolutely have been an episode of Seinfeld. You'd just have to, you know...write some jokes for it.
They did it in flashback on Arrested Development, sufficed to say it was funny when they did it.
They did it in bad education and it was funny there
pretty sure they did that on arrested development and it was funny as hell, they may have also done it on iasip
Remember that episode where George got mistaken for a White-Nationalist leader?
TBA
the thing that sucks is it would be so so so easy to make a good comedy about the royal family. including maybe making a running gag about how the kids are never around/on screen if you didn’t want to mock literal children
A good way for the two guard's joke to work is for them never talking, they would just be in the background constantly escalating. Maybe at first the guard who gets his head bumped might wear more collars, then maybe you see him with some super glue, then a metal brace built around his head. But nothing works, all building up to a murder mystery episode where the guy who gets his head bumped murders the other guy or maybe the other way around. The point is you can do a lot with this.
You put most tought on it than the writers
That’s actually really funny and would be so much fun to watch as the show progressed. How tf is someone on a RUclips comment section better at writing a running gag in just a few minutes than experienced comedy writers after months of development
True, but that would require actual effort from the writers. Why do all that when you could just use the same joke over and over and over and over and over again?
@@birdcar7808 the experienced comedy writers are not experienced in writing, they are experienced in swindling money out of production studios.
@@birdcar7808 unfortunately, experienced and in the field doesn't mean good
God imagine being Prince George and seeing this show in like 10-15 years
And then people are going to wonder why he’ll inevitably grow up to hate “poor people” and not want to help them.
@@varsityreviews707 Yeah, British royal family known for love and warmth before this show.
@@KaladarSTUCHH- Stay mad. Stop bullying the kids.
@@varsityreviews707 I just can't wrap my head around grown adults trying to justify bullying children. It's insane to me that someone can think they're the good guys doing that. Oh boy, I sure showed that 7 year old! The fuck.
@@kayrupe125 I know right. And then this kid is going to grow up bitter and resentful of everyone else because it could very well be that anyone he interacts with in the future could've been apart of or grew up with the people who made this show, not to mention, this will always be there just floating around for people to bully him about it.
I feel like the Queens "funny" lines could be more entertaining if it was her inner monologue instead.
I breathed air out of my nose imagining this. That would actually have some decent juxtaposition, portraying her as prude as she actually is but just having fucking horrible inner monologue. Would even work better for what they are trying to do, becouse then you can actually end up imagining the actual queen being prude but thinking otherwise.
Wow, when the youtube comments section is this much better of a better writer than you... you have REALLY failed as a writer.
That would actually be hilarious
Additionally, they would save on the animation budget a bit.
Why don't they hire y'all
Things in television that this show achieves:
Visuals ❌️
Comedy ❌️
Relatable subject matter ❌️
Likable characters ❌️
Originality ❌️
Is a show ✅️
Is a show ❌️
Is a bad show ✅️
Aside from the art being disgusting, it's just so obnoxiously disjointed. Why are half of the faces bizarre caricatures, while the other half are completely uninteresting? It's not like there's even a pattern to this, Prince Charles looking like a ghoul was a common enough joke that it makes sense on its own, but why does Prince William look like a boardwalk caricature? Why is the queen's face basically normal? I would honestly be fine with the disgusting caricatures if there was a pattern. If all the royals looked like caricatures, since y'know, they're inbred, while everyone else had normal faces, that would be kind of clever and a decent enough setup for humor. Instead there's just a few totally random characters with hideous faces, while everyone else has a normal face that's just done in a bad art style.
Yeah that Long face person (I forgot his name)Why does his head look like this 🗿
Isnt that style like british satite portraits if i remember correctly?
Yeah these characters remained me of this RUclipsr Meat Cayon
Yeah, I feel like Picasso came in as the key artist and everyone just had to go with it.
I normally don't care on ugly looking characters as long as their writing is good but I hate the way William looks to the point where I just get really angry about it.
This show looks and feels like a Family Guy cutaway gag that escaped and somehow made several episodes out of itself.
Mitosis
@@gaspardp7314 it reproduces via budding
This comment is singlehandedly funnier than the entire show
Prince George does seem like an attempt at Stewie? Lots of pop culture references, attempts at meta humor, addressing the audience in a way? Plus English toddler
You think THAT'S bad? Remember that time I was a butler for the Prince?
Even for someone who hates the monarchy, it feels really fucking weird to make the subject of your adult comedy a literal 8-year-old child who actually exists
Yeah I despise the royal family, but keep the personal attacks to the actual adults. The winsors does a much better job at making fun of them
Making fun at the monarchy can't go any further than lame faux rebellion in song lyrics. You know the kind of thing people can do on the side while people can pearl clutch over it. Not actual biting critique, that's disrespectful or something.
@@mattjk5299 what does that even mean. I'm all for criticism of the monarchy all I was saying was that making the subject of an adult comedy show a real 8 year old is uncomfortable. For me it has nothing to do w/ George being one of the Lizzy's heirs, it's just that he's a child.
I agree. There's actual nonces in the royal family and they keep away from that. Instead, they go after kids who aren't even old enough to have done anything worth satirising yet.
yeah, its like, if you wanna do something against the monarchy and British people, do it like Spitting image, don't do it like this shit show.
One of the moments I found funny was when the unhappy couple (whose names I can't be bothered to remember) have their butlers to do their argument. That honestly tickled my funny bone.
Another way the “Princess Charlotte is secretly a spy” gag could work is if she’s just really bad at it and she’s constantly almost blowing her cover BECAUSE SHE’S FIVE. Like, the humor of the bit was staring them right in the face. The kids don’t have to have adult personalities. Just write Charlotte like her real life age. The absurdity that the 5-year-old is the one who’s the spy practically writes itself
Or she thinks she's a spy and everyone humors her?
@Stinko De mayo you should write for this show. Sounds like you'd fit right in
@@HerohammerStudios is that an insult or a compliment?
like stewie!
The writers just liked Perry the platypus
This is literally a child’s idea of what an adult animated show is like.
Some people never grow up
yeah, pretty much like what Vivziepop does for Helluva Boss and Hazbin Hotel
@@braianchavez5523 Can’t argue there.
@@braianchavez5523
I still don’t understand why those are considered adult shows. They seem more like something for teenagers to be honest.
@@Pommmmm because they deal with heavier problems than teenage
I saw someone say that the art style of this show is the closest thing we'll ever get to racist caricatures of white people.
I GAGGED OMFG
I lol’d
LMFAO
Not only white... This style of drawing people make everybody look bad. Indian guy telling spoilers is good example. It is visual equivalent of "insulting everyone makes you look like deep and intelligent person".
LMFAOOOO
I admit I did get a chuckle out of a few things.
1.) Kate and William having their servants argue for them
2.) The Queen and Phillip thinking Oliver is a comedy
3.) The morlock bakers
My theory on this show: one day Peter Griffin walked into his living room and said "Hey Lois, remember that time the British Royal family was generally unpleasant?" And then this show punched its way into reality
Brilliant
😆
It's crazy since they don't even need to create a fictional show to portray thiz
Peter what have you done
These caricatures are fkin funny! I’d love to see the creators’ take on Mohammed, the prophet of the Muslim religion! They would absolutely kill if they had Mohammed fck the queen! 😂😂😂💀💀🗣️
Also the fact that they're an American studio trying to replicate British culture. In the one episode, most British people I know would rather blow their brains out than say the word "vacation". They use "holiday" over there guys
@trueblueprussian 23 how do you come to that conclusion? It's pretty obvious the writers just straight up don't understand anything about the royals or comedy above the most shallowest of understanding.
I kept waiting for this British RUclipsr to say that. Now I'm questioning his nationality.
Also “cell phone” & “gam gam”. Plus George is clearly meant to be Stewie. Painfully bad
@trueblueprussian 23
Fuck it. I will go full commie because I just can't stand the "class envy" bullshit. All apes (humans included) instinctively understand things like fairness. Person a was born in a poor family - they won't get higher education simply because they were unlucky. Doesn't matter how brilliant their mind is, doesn't matter how much good they would bring to this world. Person b was born in a rich family - they'll achieve success no matter how pitful they are. Mummy and daddy's money will cover all losses
I know it's shocking but we can recognize that this system is wrong. It's not class envy when you see again and again rich people getting away with pedophilia when the poor are being thrown into prisons for the things they can't even control
Everytime I see someone commenting about "class envy" I get closer to being a fucking commie. And I was raised in a country ruled by Soviets
Congrats comrade, thank you for your contribution in this discourse. Maybe it's time for praxis
the animation style is actually unique, as nobody else has ever tried to make a show with fucking bitmojis
I’m so glad I’m not the only one who thought they looked like some god damn bitmojis lmaoo
Thanks now I know what that terrible style reminded me of
The style reminds me so much of every other satirical comic strip though.
So sad to see how far animation quality has fallen.
I know some people complain about Big Mouth's animation style, but this makes it look like Miyazaki or Disney!
Fun fact: the Queen used to be an auto mechanic during the war. Up until she died, she would fix her car herself whenever it broke down. Why didn't this ever get referenced on the Prince? The image of this extremely old and posh royal jacking up a car and getting oil and transmission fluid all over her fluffy dress could have been funny.
The fact that the protagonist is an actual child is bizarre. Why are they picking on that kid lol
Because they want to have a slice of that Stewie Griffin pie
@@queencancerous5332 LMAO
@@queencancerous5332 Only Stewie is actually funny.
@@icecreamhero2375 Stewie was never funny tho....
@@natm5005 Oh come on Stewie is hilairous. Remember when he tried to Mind Control Chris. I was dying. Especially when the mind control device malfunctioned and Chris went after him.
Seth MacFarlane must love these shows. They make him look like a cross between Michelangelo and Einstein.
When Family Guy is art in comparison something has gone SO WRONG. But no lie, I can still chuckle at family guy as bad as it gets. But hot damn these new "aimed at adults" animated shows are GAAAAARBAGE.
This sounds completely accurate lol
dude probably think hes modern picasso or some shit lmao
Maybe the Cleveland show, but American dad is hysterically funny, especially the newer seasons
@@diegocaballero4142 yes I share the love for American Dad
These “adult shows” are just called adult show because they say fuck and show nasties, and that’s…sad. There’s an unfair amount of garbage that gets put on in comparison to the actual good stuff.
Obviously many times there has been made the point that even kids shows are more mature.
True, Gumball is a kids show and still they manage to make me laugh compared to these shows
Yes and swearing doesn’t mean it funny or mature.If you use a few times it could make me laugh but repeating it get so repetitive.
I laughed at loud at folders labeled "DOCUMENTS"
Also, they make a joke about how much it sucks when someone spoils things for you...by spoiling GOT for the audience...why couldn't they have just made up a show?
The only joke you showed that made me catch my breath in an almost laugh was actually Charlotte pacing on the phone and George going "wait a minute" and it panning back to her suddenly having a full tea party going. I think it operated on the same logic that the old man catching fire worked on you. In that it didn't but the sudden slightly unexpected moment of it almost tricked me into a laugh. And then I did laugh at how hard it had tried to get me to laugh
I sorta hate that it’s based on real kids lol. Maybe it’s just me overthinking it but I can’t help but to associate a lot of the show to the real family (somehow) lmao. If this was my own kids I could still laugh I think but the fact idiots in the world still see this as a documentary, you get spin off lies that kates son is gay or his brother is a super weirdo. My husband and I were like where did they get the ideas for the personalities of these kids ?!
this show looks like literally every political newspaper cartoon ive ever seen and is about as funny and clever as one as well
There's a video on political cartoons on a channel called "Thought Slime". Taking apart why they're so bad. It's the newest or second-newest video on the channel.
@@camelopardalis84 The "Who is the WORST Political Cartoonist?" video?
@@midnighthijinks7387 YES.
Except political newspaper cartoons can actually be funny.
Once in a blue moon, but yes. My personal take on why they're so dead and dry, because the artist is pushing a personal bias HARD and no matter your leaning, that push is clear and transparent as hell and sucks the humor out of it. It takes a skilled cartoonist to make a good political cartoon.
And also *why the fuck do they feel this need to label everything let us infer shit we ain't stupid*
For me the whole “prince Philip died right before this came out and the jokes are still just kinda in there” is the energy I get from the show as a whole. This show is about real people and it fails at actual satire, so it feels like they’re just taking real people and shitting all over them for no point. Especially considering two of the main foci of the show are literal real life minors who have no say in their family.
*foci*
ohhh nooo not the ultra-wealthy minors being made fun of :(((( i agree this show sucks but not because it's shitting on royals.
@@notaspider4084 Well, if you’re gonna take a crap on real people, at least do it well (ahem, Spitting Image). Also… just because an eight year old has a lot of money doesn’t mean it’s okay to make of them. They’re still an eight year old. Base the show on Charles. At least then you can claim more of a moral high ground. And it might be entertaining.
@@notaspider4084 don't say that like it's ok to make fun of a fucking child lol that is literally an eight year old. just because it happens to be born into a rich ass family doesn't mean it should be given unfair, uncalled for treatment. bullying a fucking minor before it can even read properly... you're literally just raising bad people at that point. i was born into a family of nothing, but that gives me no right to belittle a child that was raised with everything. that is still a child-a baby. you're disappointing. i'm all for shitting on shit royals, but not when that royal is a child who isn't an adult and/or a piece of garbage
@@notaspider4084 just because they're born into royalty doesn't mean they're the same as their predecessors. they're literally not even 10 yet.
17:19 Camilla never talking is a running joke they stole from Star Trek.
There is a background character named Mohn who never does anything but sitting in Quark's bar, probably because his costume does not even allow him to talk. But whenever someone is talking about Mohn, they do like he was the most exciting man in the universe.
That's neat! And also plays into well of the actual history between the Queen and Camilla. I thought the joke was clever, and also non offensive for anyone familiar too.
Why are "Adult Cartoons" feel more like a children's cartoon than ACTUAL children's Cartoons
I know what you mean, but just to bash this show further, categorizing it as a childrens cartoon does an offensive disservice to childrens cartoons
Cause adult cartoons often try too hard
Seriously did a 40 year old make this show, what kind of comedians did they hire?
for real, a lot modern children cartoons have so good writing and visual storytelling that they genuinely appeal to adult audiences as well. Crap like this on the other hand doesn’t even try to be art on any existential level. It doesn’t tell a story, it’s not pretty, and
fails miserably at the one thing it tries to do, being funny. I can name half a dozen children’s cartoons from the top of my head who do all that successfully and are appealing to adults as well as genuinely valuable for children.
@@Stormflame Star Wars The Clone Wars, Avatar the Last Air bender, thats all I can think of but those two shows are more shocking than this show.
The Queen doesn't even sound like an angry british woman, she sounds like an american trying to do a angry british woman impression. What's the point of that.
I dont understand how they fucked this up, because Frances de la Tour is literally an old british woman. Why does she sound like a bad impression of one?
Whatever
@@on37vn94 I am personally very glad you left this reply, as it contributed so much to the original comment.
American show trying to do a British accent, what's new?
@@on37vn94 you’ll get inducted into the comment hall of fame if you keep up that penmanship
The "Princess Charlotte is a spy" joke could've been *hilarious* if she still acted and spoke like a little girl. Or at least funnier than it actually is.
Playing it up as a child being misled by an international organization to act as a spy, not knowing what she's actually doing would be great.
@@CreeperOnYourHouse 100%
Perry the Platypus is the peak of this joke and presents very well how good it can be when well done
The whole show could be improved if they kids acted like kids.
Or if she actually was super competent and her handles still treated her like a little girl playing pretend.
i find you exasperatedly explaining the hat joke to be infinitely funnier than the joke itself.
Might I also add that this show is EXTREMELY unpleasant to look at? There is literally no cohesion whatsoever to the visual design of the characters. The shapes, the coloration, even the line work of each character all look different. It's not just that the show has an unpleasant design. I consider the weird long upper lip the Simpson's characters have to be unpleasant. But at least all the Simpson's characters have some variation of that same design. Contrast that to this show, where everybody's mouth is shaped completely differently. Princess Charlotte's mouth has a more front-facing design, but Queen Elizabeth's mouth hangs off to the side. I don't like how the Simpson's characters have pure yellow skin either. But at least they ALL have yellow skin, so my eyes can get used to it. Prince Charles has the entire spectrum of the color red on his face, while Prince George has only one shade of pasty white. A lot of adult animations have designs that are either lazy or ugly, but this one's is both unbelievably sloppy and downright revolting at the same time. Even if it were made like this intentionally, it doesn't matter. Actually, that would make this even worse as a creative decision. This design doesn't make me want to laugh, it makes me want to vomit. Given that the writers couldn't tell the difference between gross-out humor and just grossness, I wouldn't be surprised if the art team had a similar predicament.
Sorry about the long rant, just had to get this off my chest. Thank you for coming to my Ted talk.
Glad someone finally put into words how I feel about the design. Like, the characters are straight up ugly.
That's how I always felt with a lot of other shows such as Big Mouth or Paradise PD. Also I fucking hate princess charlotte's weird frowny rectangle mouth.
I really like the designs of the Simpsons, but I understand what you mean.
If you want the reason all adult animated rows look that way it’s because they use 2D animated rigs which are cheaper to animate than hand-drawn animation.
Very limited animation and cheaper to produce.
In a lot of movies/shows, what they try to do is make the main character appear as 'human.' They'll be the most pleasant to look at, the most relatable. While other characters will be more exaggerated. (For instance, Hotel Transylvania, Mavis is the most human like, while Count Dracula is thin and exaggerated.) This is to help create a bond between the main character and the audience.
I can see where they came from from that perspective, but damn, they failed hard.
The Prince was probably written to be a laughtrack sitcom, but they forgot to add the laugh tracks because, upon seeing the final product, the writers themselves weren't sure which part was supposed to be the joke after the fact.
I don't think I've ever seen an animated sitcom with a laughtrack after 1980.
@@kimifw58I Carly?
@@DiegoIvanSanchezOrtega That was animated?
@@kimifw58 ?
@@DiegoIvanSanchezOrtegaI don't think ICarly was a cartoon
The dumbest thing is that, like, SNL did the whole "what if the Queen was actually the opposite of posh" bit with Fred Armisen and it was hilarious. And if SNL can do it, then it's not exactly a hard bit to pull off.
You know you're below the bottom of the barrel when SNL is funnier than you.
@@tjenadonn6158 To be fair it depends on the writers and who's doing what in the sketches. Lots of talented people who can actually make really great sketches, but some just fall flat or aren't funny.
Also, if SNL already did it (FKING ELEVEN YEARS AGO) maybe you need to add something to the joke to justify its existence. But it actually seems like they detracted from it.
In the SNL sketch, at first you see the queen and she's all nice and polite, and then when they're left alone, she reveals her true, cockney nature.
From this video at least it seems like The Prince skipped all that, and just had her rude and abrasive all of the time, so there's no contrast even.
The "impression" that Adam Buxton does of the Queen is always really funny to me.
PAINFUL aint even a Word anymore!
I died, became a Ghost-Pokemon,
fell in Love with a Fire-Pokemon and now we're
running-away CAUSE OF OUTGROUP-BIASED of Both Species!!!
!?
...And? How was your day meanwhile?
If I had a nickel for every time some media portrays Queen Elizabeth as short tempered and quick to anger, I'd have 2 nickels.
Which is not much, but it's weird that it happened twice.
Which time was the other one?
Doofenschmitz reference I see
I will literally never get over this. They are standing side by side and they bow forwards, it is literally impossible for their hats to collide.
That might literally be the only way it could be seen as funny; the absurd physical humor only possible in cartoons, like Wile E. Coyote painting a tunnel onto a rock face and the Road Runner running through it.
If they didn't call it out everytime and just left it, I think it'd actually be funnier
Edit: Yeah, when he shows the three clips back to back to back without the "punchlines," it is actually funnier 😂
it isn't even visually animated in an interesting way. if you muted the dialogue, you more than likely wouldn't be able to understand what happened.
The animators just don't know what layers are, their entire lives are in 2D
Also, maybe this is a stereotype, whereas I'm a stupid American. But aren't members of The Queen's Guard supposed to be silent?
Even if that's a stereotype, I feel like that could be combined with the hat gag to great effect.
i wouldn’t mind this show as much if they focused it more around the adult members of the royal family with the kids making occasional appearances, but instead they decided to construct entire personalities for children who aren’t even old enough to watch the show. i don’t mind making fun of rich monarchs every now and again, but basing an entire adult animated show on a living, breathing child who just happened to be born into wealth is just creepy, man
Truly.
Edit:not sarcastic, it is seriously fucked up.
Yeah, I think that if they wanted to make a satire revolving around a young prince, they either should've invented an entirely new fictional royal family, (like The Royals did) or made Will or Harry into children again. (Like what Lil' Bush did with George W. Bush.)
I feel like the Queen's gag of being rude and obnoxious in contradiction to her real life character would be better if they did the opposite. Exaggerate her highness's poshness.
Yeah, get her to be like the mom from Arrested Development, that’d be way better than whatever the fuck this idea was lol
Make her extremely posh, with weird rules, slowly add supernatural rules like she has to be invited places to enter and make the dated "the queen is immortal" joke work
Its not rocket science
@@notmocka that would be pretty funny
I love the comment sections on reviews of shitty adult animated shows, just filled with people coming up with better executions for the jokes in the series.
Or even just have her vulgar mouth contrast her high class attitude. Make so despite what she says, she's one of the most well managed characters in the show.
The gag about the word “episode” being spelled progressively worse throughout the charlotte joke compilation was genuinely funnier than this entire show
impossible. name a single adult animated show that is unfunny. its literally the pinnacle of comedy every time its executed. like blackberry and tacoma f.d and scoops, the adult animated show about a funny haha lacrosse coach
Things try to recreate what family guy once had
Bobs burgers
Literally every adult animated show.
except Bob's Burgers, I actually liked that show.
*EDIT:* I now realise how wrong this comment is.
@@PurpleHighway25 BoJack is funny. When it wants to be.
@@PurpleHighway25 King of the Hill is still unrivalled
I'm genuinely disturbed they used an actual child as a character like this, a child shouldn't deserve this.
The main issue is that they're making a caricature of a real child too, this is just gonna be a big point for bullying one day.
Why couldn't they have gone the sensible route and just made a fictional kid like Bart or Stewie, or whatever?
@@tentacledood5784 Imagine if the show focused on a family of one of the royal guards, with Prince George being friends with the fictional child. He could've been realistic to contrast the character that is actually being made fun of, kinda like Chris from the show Dan vs
Surely you hold get better comedy out of a show satirising Charles? Or the Queen? Like, why an eight year old?
Yeah I'm trying to imagine finding out there's an animated TV Show that has a main character that looks like me and has my name and is like, literally me. Now I'm imagining that when I was 8...What. The. Fuck.
I didn't choose my parents nor what house I grew up in. It's disgusting that this family is allowed to FORCE a child to be alive, and have this all made and done without his consent, yet "it's okay" because...why? Rich? "Royal?" his parents forced him to be in the public eye. Fuck this, I'm relieved I'm not born in this family.
The fact they made Prince George's character a gay caricature because he wanted to do ballet is also gross.
This show is basically what any adult animated comedy shouldn't be.
I think they are trying to aim at youth teen EdgeLord
Family Guy is better than this show. Seriously.
Allen Gregory would like to have a word with you
@@strawberrykeiku family guy exceeds.
And sadly what a lot of them are..
Ok, so I've been thinking about this for SEVERAL days now, and I think I finally get the Demi Lovado thing. The joke is that most of these sorts of animated adult "comedies" are written by conservatives, so when the subject of Demi Lovado being nonbinary comes up, we, the audience, are expecting something offensive or transphobic. But it never happens, Prince George is totally nonchalant about the whole thing, and I guess that does count as a subversion of expectations, but just barely, and if I'm being honest, even that seems like a reach. I don't really have any other explanation for this, though, so that's the best I can come up with.
Without having seen the show, I think saying Elizabeth has been queen "for more than 10 years" is funnier than the entirety of the show even if you were high.
It's like, trying to do Phineas and Ferb comedy, but failing horribly
Nothing will beat Phineas and ferb tbh
Why is Jay Exci logo like that is he gay or something?
@@cytronknight3884 ...What?
@@tentacledood5784 his logo has him with makeup and fingernail paint, foes that mean he's gay?
@@cytronknight3884 jay is transitioning
Isn't it weird how adult cartoons are more for kids and kids cartoons are more mature nowadays?
I wouldn't have liked this garbage as a kid.
Kids shows have always been more mature. Remember sonic says? The targeted demographic for that show was for adults who come home from a hard work day.
@@Soapy-chan_old As a small kid though? I think you would of liked it.
@@thatotherted3555 I didn't mean a toddler i meant a kid like around 5 or so but whatever you say buddy.
I dread the day that this show or a show like this gets more episodes than The Owl House (here’s hoping for an early cancellation!)
i can't believe that at 2:40 he said that the brown window frame is just as funny as the other stuff, like excuuuse me that window frame is hilarious
The show is so bad she literally died
OMG 💀💀💀💀
fr
This joke is funnier than the show
fr@@jackisbored2608
Why should the fact that the queen died make this show bad. It isnt like the queen died before they released it
You know, that "running gag" hat bump thing you showed in the beginning is even worse than you mentioned, because it only "functions" at all because the characters are 2d. The way they're standing, they're supposed to be next to each other, and when they bow their heads, they're supposed to be bowing forward. If it weren't an animated show, with the characters drawn at a side angle, the one guy would have to lean his head TO THE SIDE in order to bump the other guy, and thus wouldn't be able to "accidentally" bump him.
Oh wow, you actually figured out another aspect of why the joke doesn't work, that's impressive.
I noticed that too. It was annoying the hell out of me.
It’s wild they give those two characters a whole “arc” or at least I think that’s what they want it to be lol. They sing together and one remembers the others bday after being annoyed wit the pointless hat thing! Which makes me think he had a crush and bumped his hat on purpose but like why the fuck do I care cause I don’t?!
It could be a nice bit of 4th wall humor, as well!
Honestly, I spent way too long trying to figure out how logistically that would work from a 3D sense 😂
I'm imagining all the college grads in marketing, hi-fiving each other as they write these jokes, and getting douche-bumps.
I think it’s well deserved considering they keep getting green lit to make new shows
@@jeredgibb5064 but the stories suck, and not a lot of people enjoy them.
@@overlordtealover1128 his point is that the graduates are high fiving each other on merit of successfully peddling their hogwash to whoever green lights these shows.
what i hate is that 99% of the jokes aren't even able to be discerned as jokes unless you think about it and that 1% of jokes that are kinda something seem way funnier than they are bc of that
If you told me that the running gag between the two guards bumping hats was written by an AI, then I would actually believe you.
AI writes better
Yeah, GPT-4 can unironically write better comedy scripts than this
They just cut the part where chatgpt makes its life lesson happy ending moral summary i swear
AI steals from good shit though
Weirdly, the bumping-hats joke would’ve been funnier if they just never addressed it. Two background characters that don’t speak but are always bumping hats when they bow.
It’s still not “funny”, but still an improvement with less effort.
Consider: Every time it happens you can visibly see the guy who gets bumped slowly get more and more irritated with every bump to the point that he's biting back rage. It culminates in a murder 'mystery' season finale where the bumping-guard is found dead. The audience knows whodunit, so it would be the dramatic irony of all the main charaters accusing one another that would make it funny/tense.
@@lagtim327 That's a great idea
@@lagtim327 the fact that you probably came up with this in a few minutes just makes me hate this show even more
I think it would be funny if the final time he was hit with the hat he pushed him.
@@lagtim327 lol
The worst part is - minus the fact that this will always exist - is that you could probably fix a lot of the comedy simply by making all the characters act perfect in public and then like they do in the show behind closed doors. It wouldn't necessarily make the show _funny_ but there would be some comedy, at least.
In a way I think it's what the Writers were thinking this show was
except they completely forgot to put that in the show because they expected everyone to watch the show with the same mentality as them, like they just took it for granted that the joke is these people act perfect in public and didn't even bother to show it, they thought real life was enough
I did actually like the joke where the Queen and Phillip think Oliver is a comedy. The Morlock bakers also got a chuckle out of me.
Alternatively, make the main characters be the servants, cooks, cleaners, etc - generate comedy through the idea of them having to deal with this horde of rude assholes who don't understand or appreciate their underlings. Make a poignant commentary on the way royal power turns people into inhuman monsters by writing the lower caste people as functional, 3D characters while the royals are these warped caricatures
This could make a gag where people keep entering their area in private and they keep switching.
Precisely. If the joke is the juxtaposition between what we perceive the Royal Family as and what they "actually" are like then *make it part of the show*.
I’m pretty sure the “joke” about not knowing what the charity event is for is that they don’t know what it is for, as in “they don’t really care about the charity, it is just for good PR”. So more a critique of the elites that do countless charity events without actually caring.
So we are both watching this 3 yr old vid 😂
An American styled cartoon starring mainly U.K. figures sure sounds like a great marketing idea. Truly an inspiration to all
@Fancy hat If it's the HH cast, then why the hell would you americanise it? People across the pond would probably prefer the HH cast!
@Fancy hat Just saw the trailer and my god it looks awful. It's going to end up being one of those situations like the US Inbetweeners
@Fancy hat why do Americans have to go after everything I love
what is "american styled" lol
Man's literally speaking Queen's English isn't he? Hard to tell how biased this is
This show should’ve used a fictional royal family clearly parodying the British royal family and it should’ve had actual comedy
Exactly what I’ve been thinking. I’d write a show about a young prince that slowly grows to realize that a lot of royal life is toxic, and becoming a better person that any of his predecessors.
@@Methus3lah no it should be about a young prince, who grows up to think that he is a better person than any of his predecessors, but he just exerts control over people in a new or different way that’s more insidious than the explicit toxicity of his predecessors
@@Methus3lahso, moral orel?
Yeah, they chose to use the real royal family, but ruined it with imitation Comedy from a can.
It would’ve been funny for them to create a fake name for the fictional kingdom for the family tbh
There is no Easter bunny, there is no tooth fairy, and there is no queen of England
💀💀💀
@@jimmy2239 it’s so nice they made an emoji to honour good ol lizzie
@@ghostie-8089 💀💀💀
@@ghostie-8089 and its so good they made a emoji for the twin towers too ⚰️
@@Liverpoolfcthebest you forgot the second one, ⚰️⚰️and the plane⚰️⚰️💥✈️
“Adult” humor is literally just teenager humor. A mix of gross out humor and swears.
They could have had the joke be that her servants don't know what "that little thing I like to eat" is and she attempts to describe it and does a bad job and everyone just gets more confused until it turns out that it's something super common and easy to remember. Or there could be wacky hijinks surrounding them trying to figure out what that thing is without alerting her to the fact that they have no idea what she's talking about. There are so many possible ways to make that funny and they did none of them.
I think the joke was that in the UK “tart” can also mean “whore”...? but idk honestly. Also good idea
The main painful thing in this show is that they think swearing alone counts as a joke.
Well fuck.
Worst part is even if it was, they swear so often you're already numb to it, so it's just like an awkward silence while the show stares at you like "....so..? any thoughts on that?"
and it's like... any thoughts on what? it's the millionth swearword so far
@@Jack_Woods this
They swear all the time in South Park, but that’s never the joke, it is just natural, except for the episode that was meant to show that swear words are just words.
I think the most telling thing about this show is how transparently they're trying to make Prince George sound like Stewie Griffin. This is clearly somebody trying to blatantly rip off Family Guy (but in Britain! With royalty! Get it?!) whilst also horribly misunderstanding exactly WHY Family Guy worked as a show in the first place.
*early family guy.
@@aperson4287 Yes, very true! The more recent seasons have actually fallen into a lot of the same problems this show has.
Instead of trying to copy the first couple seasons of Family Guy they're trying to copy current Family Guy.
Like, why, we already have a shitty version of Family Guy. It's called Family Guy.
@@milliondollarmistake LMAO! Well said, I couldn't agree more.
This wont surprise you: the main writer and voice of the protagonist worked in family guy
18:16 that joke you made was honestly way funnier than the rest of the show
The worst part of this show is that an animated satire of the royal family actually could be a great show if executed right and with the actual knowledge of British royalty and the shit around it being used in the writing rather than "haha shitty poop mean words bad person hahaha"
That! The royal family actually has strong characters.
It could be so easy
Personally what rubs me the wrong way is the fact that they made the main characters of the show real kids, and actively making fun of them. Poke fun at adult celebrities all you want, but leave the children out of it. They also don't include Andrew which is HILARIOUS. They don't make fun of the alleged predator but they have no issue bullying kids.
@@aperson4287 THIS WAS WHAT I WAS THINKING TOO
The Windsors is basically that but in live-action.
Sweden actually had a show like that back in 2004 called "Hey Baberiba", that satirized the Swedish royal family (though it was live-action, not animated). They didn't work any royal kids into the jokes so it was also in well taste.
It was interesting watching this video because at certain points your narrations almost sank up with the character's mouth moving LOL
sync*
I'm too high to have read that waiting for the video to start
sank
Shrink
Skywalker
I think the "Gorgenstein's" gag is about celebrities doing charities for things they know nothing about to maintain their image, but it's not presented well.
Yeah, that's what I thought too. Arrested Development did that same gag by having their characters go to charity events whose causes were directly at odds with each other, which was more clever, much more subtle, and actually was funny.
There is an idea for a joke there, it just was executed really poorly.
Brass Eye did it far better in the '90s, having real celebrities and MPs do things like make anti-drug PSAs about fictional drugs and getting them to campaign on behalf of an elephant that shoved it's head up it's anus. They even roped Phil Collins into one of their schemes, getting him to make a promo for a fictional pedophilia awareness group called Nonce Sense. Later on the guys behind it, mainly the duo of Armando Iannucci and Chris Morris, went on to make shows like The Thick of It and Veep, which are some of the few pieces of explicitly political comedy that have managed to stay funny after their zeitgeist has passed.
@@kylejones8289 Arrested Development also did the joke better in S3, when in flashback we find out that they raised a lot of money for TBD, as well as later in the episode where they run a fundraiser for Tobias's body rejecting his hair plugs. It does kinda feel like bullying to compare this poorly thought out piece of shit to Arrested Development.
@@tjenadonn6158 Brass Eye was fantastic.
Watching this analysis, I kept thinking about how Arrested Development has the type of humor this show is going for, but actually makes it funny with a satisfying payoff.
If it's really true that this is just meant to be a pseudo Stewie Griffin spinoff, then i can see the logic that went behind Charlotte's spy scenes: Stewie's character isn't just "Sassy gay child". He's also a genius mad scientist. As a result, a good chunk of his episodes involve him going on some sci-fi adventure involving his inventions. Charlotte is meant to tick that box by being a spy with spy gadgets.
A running gag needs to like, escalate, or change, or be a small part of another skit.
Like I could see it being funny if they keep bumping hats *despite trying not to* once they know it's a problem. Like they try to stand further apart; still bump hats, dammit. Or try to avoid bumping hats and to it anyway in a parody of that little dance people do when trying not to run into each other... but with hats. Culminating in true absurdity, like a strong wind blows one's hat off, across the doorway, into the other guys.
Doing the same bit, three times, with almost no change, a the "highlight" of a scene, is like the opposite of how to do a running gag.
and if they wouldn't acknowledge it every time, there might be some comedy to it. a background bump that doesn't draw attention for the first two times, with a quiet "stop" on the third, would feel like there was some nuance within the joke. either going full-blown absurd or keeping it mellow might work; they instead chose the worst of both worlds.
or like a dominoe thing could be funny
like in monty python, "and now for something completely different" guy
he starts in an office, then he's in the woods, and i havent watched all of it yet but so far his most exaggerated appearance is one where he's sitting at his desk, up to his chest in water
Even if the guy got slowly madder, and then at the end he just attacks him, still would have been dumb, but still better than the non-joke
@@mrthadthebad1 And then their hat bumps together while they fight
“Something bad happened to this man” has better comedic timing than every joke from the prince you show
Why are "adult" animated shows more immature and gross compared to most kid shows? Family Guy (early seasons), The Simpsons, Futurama and some others I don't know of were good because they didn't rely on cringe, gross-out humour, constant swearing and making outdated references (well, early Family Guy didn't).
Believe it or not the kid show viewers (the older ones( despise gross humor. If Only really little kids would watch them(if they also have colourful charecters and are loud that is)). The most despised kids shows are the gross ones.
You're not gonna get the money from the teens and adults who still watch kids cartoons. It's rare that they succeed even tho some have. Plus the current creators are more interested in telling a story they've always wanted to see done before. Emphasis on STORY. They use the 'kids' title as an excuse to show that story. The fandom has people from every age group so it needs to be liked by everyone and as said before not all age groups like those stuff.
And or just to entertain really really young kids. That stuff needs to be extremely family friendly but also calming or educational. Parents would explode otherwise. Ofcourse this ones can have gross jokes like puking or farting but they can't go as far as some adult cartoons.
the amazing world of gumball is a better “adult show” than all the shit on netflix ngl
Bojack Horseman is another good example of an adult animated show that has good humor and doesnt rely on crude humor to do it, not to mention complex characters that get more than one or two episodes to themselves to really dive into who they are
@@mortimer687 Funny thing is I've heard rumours that Gumball was originally pitched to Adult Cartoon networks but they wouldn't accept it because it was "Too colorful" or some bullcrap like that.
@@aperson4287
It was supposed to be an adult swim show about reject cartoon charecters going too a remedical school but it was changed later. Oddly enough the reject charecter plot line came back in the later seasons as a dimention were useless forgotten charecters got sent
8:41 WHO LABELS DOCUMENTS TOP SECRET AND THEN STAMPS A BIG RED MARK TO SAY THEYRE DOCUMENTS. Looks like an animator got the words the wrong way round. Also the labels switch sides from right to left after two just in case you thought the top secrets under would not be document.
I think it's crazy that just looking at the art style I feel I've already seen the show.
Lets admit we didnt support Constructive Criticism (and Humor itself) enough,
so we let all this Happen.
So let support the s-it out of Jay Excis hour-long video on Doctor Who,
just like Madvocate and Hbomberguy did for other Franchises.
Is that sometrhing we can all get behind?
Yeah it's kinda like family guy, right?
@@iwanttosleep5053 naw, mr pickles and paradise pd all day
This style literally makes me uncomfortable
As an artist, its not hard to tell theres atleast _four_ fucking different artstyles going on at the same time.
You have butt-ugly old, a style clearly seen on butlers, the queen, and her husband. They either have negative chin, or 100% chin.
You have child, a fairly standard adult animated styled kid, except with a larger than normal head.
You have women, and I say women because _all of them are goddamn bobble-headed Bratz dolls._ They are nearly the exact same proportions as the child but _stretched_ upwards, not scaled, stretched. Their ears extend to the ends of their shoulders, and its _way too fucking big for their dainty necks._
Then lastly you have tallheads, Prince William and Prince Henry are both examples, people with extremely tall and thin heads, and tiny eyes.
*_None_* of these are styles fit together. Its not comprised in a way that gives everyone a unique art style either, theres clearly similarities between _some_ characters, but with no pattern. Its an inconsistent style that makes characters look very out of place in diverse shots. In the dinner table room, it looks like a Bratz episode being photobombed by a political cartoon and Mr Pickles. Its horrible to look at.
The Prince's character is just Stewie Griffin. The voice actor sounds like hes trying to do an impression of him
Oh you mentioned that. I just got to that part lol
Did you just reply to yourself?..
@@rambybamb540 yes, but the "you" was referring to Jay, not myself
@@noodledood12 ah alright, sorry about that.
@@rambybamb540 no problemo little dude🤝
It's truly amazing. That running "gag" with the the one guards' hat hitting the other guards' hat would've worked if he *didn't* acknowledge it. It wouldn't have exactly been comedy gold, but it would've worked. How could they screw up such an easy joke!? Also, the way the princess's mouth is drawn really...pisses me off and I don't know why. It's like everything about this show is designed to be as insulting and annoying as possible.
I'm really glad to know I'm not the only one irrationally bothered by the position of her mouth and the structure of her face.
Imagine if the guards where just acted like statues they just stare blankly at the characters and instead of having them walk they leave the scene via a quick blackout and when lights come back on their just not there
Especially the princes’s heads, those are not appealing and I absolutely hate how they’re drawn
I feel the same way about the spy gag, if prince george didn’t continue to point out “hey something’s up here” basically explaining the joke it might’ve been a bit more funny
They just never acknowledge it but it keeps happening and making the scene awkward each time
and the last time it happens you just see the guy in the background hit him in the face like "STOP IT!"
Half of the characters look like Meat Canyon drew them, but not in the good way.
"Meatcanyon character but it was drawn in 30 seconds"
I think what probably seems the strangest thing to me about the show is how the main character is a real person who's a real child. Like it's one thing to make satire of adults for the decisions that they make, but it just seems kind of messed up how the focus is on the kids as well. I don't want to say that it's like bullying children, but I also don't think a show like this is good for the actual royal children since it already shapes how others perceive them. Idk, maybe I'm just thinking too much about it
I'm 100% with you. The very first time I heard about this show, my reaction was "What kind of heartless person makes mocking satire out of an actual child?"
My opinion hasn't changed.
Eh, it seems to me that the children aren't the target, they're moreso the "eyes" through which we see the world. Plus, they're all insanely rich and the family is a joke in real life, being an outdated and useless group of people, so who really cares. The kids will never know anything resembling a bad day, and since it doesn't exactly seem to mock or target them, I don't see the big deal. I don't think it's a great plan, but if it had been actually funny, it wouldn't have bothered me. That being said, if it actually targeted or vindictively mocked the children themselves, I might be more on your side. They just don't seem like the target here.
@@d3rrick10493 "Plus, they're all insanely rich and the family is a joke in real life, being an outdated and useless group of people, so who really cares." So it's fine because they are rich. Yet celebs sons and daughters are richer. They are apparently a joke in real life to you. How so?
@@d3rrick10493 What is so funny about being forced into slavery from birth? I really want to know. Because that's what they are. They don't have the same rights as us British citizens. They have less. They are forced into a position due to the bloodline. And how our government works. They can't vote. They can't give a political opinion. They are forced to be ambassadors for our country and forced to be icons of culture for us Brits. As a British person, I want to know the joke.
No that’s valid
What needs to happen is that they make another one of these shows, with obvious Rick and Morty art inspiration, lazy humor, the works. But by the end of the 2nd episode, things start to derail, and the genre shifts. Horror, existential drama, anything.
I would love to see a family guy clone turn into love craft
Soooo Bojack Horseman
Adult animation just feels like NFT's now
Cuz they all look the same, have very little purpose, and are all done for one thing: MONEY.
foreal
that’s a perfect description. quantity over quality.
remember that nft show? theyre the same shit. unfunny,repetitive,and over all just boring.
Not all adult animation but i get what u mean
Why do adult cartoons always look like this? It's such an unappealing art style
Gross = adult I guess
It's cheap
I feel bad for the innocent child(ren), who gets made fun of in a trash show like this, simply just for the fact of where they were born.
you feel bad for royals?
@@algumnomeaihehe Y'know, probably because they're human beings too, or idk, because they're FUCKING CHILDREN?
@@meh7973 lol no
@@meh7973 theyll b alr
@@algumnomeaihehe bro they 4-6 years old, royal or not, they haven't done anything note worthy in their lives to deserve this treatment
I'm trying to imagine what it'll be like for that prince kid when he finds out this parody of him and his family exists.
Yeah I feel like it's a bit fucked up to portray a real life kid like this
Imagine someone making a comedy about ur life but it ends up being just... sad
I don’t think the Royal Family give a damn. They’ve had gutter press doing this sort of thing to them for centuries after all.
@@TheNDofUO This is definitely where the stupid "Charlotte is a spy" gag came from. They were desperately grasping for something funny... sorry something "funny"... to do with a rreal life 6 year old girl that wouldn't make the writers seem like creepy ghouls
honestly this is probably the least of things he'll have to worry about once he's old enough to find it. still fucked up though that they thought this was okay from HBOs side.
I don't care that he's a public figure, this is a TV show made about a real life child without his or his parents consent, and it portrays him as a twat. I'm not comfortable with this show
same, it's weird there's a whole ass show mocking real people. i don't really care about the british monarchy (although i do agree that it's stupid they chose to depict a child like that) but the whole concept of that is weird.
@@carrion1546 bruh, Brits are lucky to have a monarchy than a failed republic
God can you imagine if they got a 2nd season now.
@@Pkxdnaooficial excuse me🧍♀️
It seem like they portrayed him as queer to which also make me feel wierd ( I’m queer myself btw) bc it really wierd
Imagine going to animation school and getting good at art to get stuck with a show that looks like it was drawn by a child