The Problem of Perception (John Searle)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 41

  • @evinnra2779
    @evinnra2779 2 года назад +3

    I can't wait to see you re-upload more of these lectures.

  • @johnjackson917
    @johnjackson917 2 года назад +10

    a damn shame about all the business of him being a creep ... Searle has got a lot of good lectures out there. Happy to see you re-uploading them. Thanks much as always, PO

    • @DarrenMcStravick
      @DarrenMcStravick 2 года назад +5

      He must be a pragmatist about ethics too. Lost so much respect for him. No integrity left in that man.

    • @johnjackson917
      @johnjackson917 2 года назад +3

      yeah its a disgrace honestly

    • @reddykilowatt
      @reddykilowatt 2 года назад

      meh then I guess you can go all the way back and cancel Socrates and Plato too.

    • @DarrenMcStravick
      @DarrenMcStravick 2 года назад +6

      @@reddykilowatt What do you even think you're contributing by saying that?

    • @reddykilowatt
      @reddykilowatt 2 года назад

      @@DarrenMcStravick seems pretty obvious if you are familiar with their thoughts and behavior

  • @77capr3
    @77capr3 2 года назад +8

    The recording seems cut short to just before he gets around to making his main point of rescuing naive realism. Is there a more complete recording of his lecture?

    • @ДДД-й6ы
      @ДДД-й6ы 2 месяца назад

      How can naive realism be saved?
      The brain deals with transformed signals, neurons, synapses, and neuroimpulses. So there is no direct perception.
      You cannot see the world directly. only through neuroimpulses in the brain.
      Just as it cannot be called direct, naive realism when you see a person on a computer monitor. This is not a real person, but a transformed one. Copy.
      Similarly, you can only see a COPY of the world, but not directly.

  • @lizgichora6472
    @lizgichora6472 Год назад

    Excellent! Thank you for the lecture; from Renee Descartes objective reality and perceptions as well as Epistemic objectivity derived from data through Experience and Intentionality Professor John Searle

  • @casapuradu6059
    @casapuradu6059 10 месяцев назад

    Good day gentleman! Where could I find the rest of the lecture I am really enthusiast to listen to it. Thank you

  • @user-vg7zv5us5r
    @user-vg7zv5us5r 2 года назад +1

    1:04:08 Oops, my mind has shifted during that part so I haven't heard what Searle had said)

  • @user-vg7zv5us5r
    @user-vg7zv5us5r 2 года назад

    1:00:02 It doesn't matter. It just is))

  • @user-vg7zv5us5r
    @user-vg7zv5us5r 2 года назад

    28:19 Sound wave and sound isn't the same? Or prof. Searle distinct a mechanic oscillation of particles from what happens in our ears.

    • @ДДД-й6ы
      @ДДД-й6ы 2 месяца назад

      It's not about what's going on in your ears. It's about how the brain interprets it.
      The final result of what is happening in your ears is only neuroimpulses. And that's what the brain is dealing with. And not with vibrations of sound waves.
      And only after the brain perceives these neuroimpulses does the SENSATION of sound arise.
      By the way, the neuroimpulses coming from the ears are exactly the same in nature as the neuroimpulses coming from the optic nerve.

  • @Bibibosh
    @Bibibosh Год назад

    111th like. something to be proud of.

  • @africandawahrevival
    @africandawahrevival Год назад

    What I got from this lecture, "Deesaster" 😂