I love your videos! You are a great speaker covering difficult topics. While not a Catholic, I have an intense interest in the history of the Early Church. Your lectures, like this one, cover these topics. Thank you and God bless you.
Concerning the title of Chapter one of your book on the Novus Ordo. Why do you use the word "Progressive" Catholicism. There is no "progress" in the position pushed by a liberal or deforming Christianity. I suggest you read a book entitled Trimming the Ark Catholic Attitudes to the Cult of Change by Christopher Derrick. In it he examines how for many, change is automatically progress...they think of evolution as automatic improvement when it isn't and many adaptions are mutations end in a dead end. Likewise language. The agenda of deformers is covered by buzz or bright shiny words such as progressive, innovative, and reform when these words disguise malformation, distortion and corruption.
The moral law is written on our hearts and the ten commandments are perpetually binding. The ceremonial ritual laws of Moses (most of Leviticus) were a tool used by God in the Old Covenant to foreshadow the New. The ceremonial law is no longer binding while the moral laws are.
See the Council of Ephesus. What you are stating was the belief of the 5th century heresy of Nestorianism. The title of Mother of God does not imply that Mary is the mother of Jesus's Divine Nature, but that she is the mother of the person of Jesus by nature of his human nature, and thus is the mother of a person who is God. To deny that Jesus (God) has a mother is to deny the incarnation.
@@historiaecclesiastica the man Jesus of Nazareth had a mother. The spirit of God is eternal has no mother. Therefore, Mary's title at best would be Mary mother of Jesus. To call her Mother of God is a lie and blasphemy.
@@historiaecclesiastica no, I'm articulating "Hear, oh Israel, the LORD our God is one". The heresy is the third century trinitarian incorporation of Ba'al worship that converted God to three persons.
I love your videos! You are a great speaker covering difficult topics. While not a Catholic, I have an intense interest in the history of the Early Church. Your lectures, like this one, cover these topics. Thank you and God bless you.
This channel definitely needs more viewers.
Underrated channel
Fantastic stuff! Thank you! Aeneas was new to me!
Concerning the title of Chapter one of your book on the Novus Ordo. Why do you use the word "Progressive" Catholicism. There is no "progress" in the position pushed by a liberal or deforming Christianity.
I suggest you read a book entitled Trimming the Ark Catholic Attitudes to the Cult of Change by Christopher Derrick. In it he examines how for many, change is automatically progress...they think of evolution as automatic improvement when it isn't and many adaptions are mutations end in a dead end. Likewise language. The agenda of deformers is covered by buzz or bright shiny words such as progressive, innovative, and reform when these words disguise malformation, distortion and corruption.
The laws of Moses were written on our hearts, so are we not keeping the law of Moses?
The moral law is written on our hearts and the ten commandments are perpetually binding. The ceremonial ritual laws of Moses (most of Leviticus) were a tool used by God in the Old Covenant to foreshadow the New. The ceremonial law is no longer binding while the moral laws are.
@@historiaecclesiastica gotcha.
Mary was not the "mother of God". That would suggest God had a beginning and Mary predated him.
See the Council of Ephesus. What you are stating was the belief of the 5th century heresy of Nestorianism. The title of Mother of God does not imply that Mary is the mother of Jesus's Divine Nature, but that she is the mother of the person of Jesus by nature of his human nature, and thus is the mother of a person who is God. To deny that Jesus (God) has a mother is to deny the incarnation.
@@historiaecclesiastica the man Jesus of Nazareth had a mother. The spirit of God is eternal has no mother. Therefore, Mary's title at best would be Mary mother of Jesus. To call her Mother of God is a lie and blasphemy.
@ERLong-ww7yn Like I said, you're articulating the ancient universally condemned heresy of Nestorianism.
@@historiaecclesiastica no, I'm articulating "Hear, oh Israel, the LORD our God is one". The heresy is the third century trinitarian incorporation of Ba'al worship that converted God to three persons.