Lisa Randall - Asking Ultimate Questions?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 мар 2020
- Push boundaries. Discern the deep essence of existence. Search the foundations of reality. Imagine all that may exist in physical realms beyond current understanding. Seek to know now all that can be known. Overly ambitious? Sophomoric? We don't care. We do it anyway. Enjoy asking ultimate questions.
Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/376lkKN
Watch more interviews with Lisa Randall: bit.ly/3dsz0Ei
Lisa Randall is an American theoretical physicist and a leading expert on particle physics and cosmology. She works on several of the competing models of string theory in the quest to explain the fabric of the universe. Her best known contribution to the field is the Randall-Sundrum model, first published in 1999 with Raman Sundrum. She was the first tenured woman in the Princeton University physics department and the first tenured female theoretical physicist at both MIT and Harvard University.
Register for free at CTT.com for subscriber-only exclusives: bit.ly/2GXmFsP
Closer to Truth presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.
#WomenInSTEM #Physics
"Deeper understanding with predictive consequences." One of my favorite phrases of all time. Thanks Lisa
Absolutely love Lisa Randell. She is one of the few brilliant physicists who can actually talk straight and is understandable (as is Roger Penrose). Definitely amongst the top 21st century scientists in the world. Thanks for interviewing her.
Lisa Randall is awesome.
Lisa Randall places upon the proverbial table of discourse numerous and priceless pseudoscience-dissolving ideas and concerns. This is an exceptionally refreshing interview. 🌸
Lisa Randall's book on string theory was the first serious book on the subject: I bought it, read it and started my own exploration of theoretical physics. Trouble is, I can only use my imagination to understand most of it since the Maths are way beyond me...😞 But thanks to Lisa for introducing me to the strange and fascinating world of physics!
that's ok, just accept it on faith. haha
Refreshing to hear someone speak of what we know and what we don't know. She displays humility and honesty that is rare.
Almost all scientists and people with scientific worldview speak like that. It's mostly the religious who are arrogant and sure of what they believe in. Dunning-Kruger effect playing out.
@@SAL-9000 No not hardly. If "all scientists" did speak like that it wouldn't be refreshing. Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett are a few examples of arrogant scientists.
@@TheTruthseeker1231 LOL, OK! Now I see the intention behind your original comment. I can also tell that you haven't seen or read anything from the scientists that you mentioned. Not so humble and honest of you!
@@SAL-9000 That is a pretty arrogant comment. How do you know my motivations? I have read plenty from these "scientists" mentioned. You clearly have degraded into the realm of projection and Ad hominem so that tells me what I need to know about you.
@@TheTruthseeker1231 I'm not projecting anything. I can see from your subscriptions that you're a Christian. So, I can clearly see the intention behind considering those specific set scientists who have spoken against dogmatic religions as "arrogant".
If you have read anything from Richard Dawkins at least, you'd know that he has always acknowledged that we don't know everything. He only resists the idea that a mysterious universe necessitates a belief in a "creator". Him and several other scientists have also said that there is much more humility in accepting that we are just a part of and a rare quirk of the universe and that there could be life elsewhere in the universe too, than in suggesting that there is a creator who created this whole vast universe specifically for humans living on Earth.
Dr.Lisa have deep insight and authority of multiverse
Lisa always had such deep insight...
I like her.
Yes , Thnx . . . How can dark matter & dark energy not hold a huge amount of valuable insight ? It must hold invaluable answers.
Does gravity come from tiny gram / singularity at start of universe and / or center of black holes?
The Question of What is Nature is important.
I'd say anything that exists is part of nature, including any transcendent realms, supernatural stuff, or even God/gods.
That's why I think terms like "supernatural" and "non-physical" are counter productive. But if I just had to call something that we know to exist "supernatural", that something would be consciousness--specifically subjective, first-person, conscious *experience.*
Could dark energy be everywhere, including outside universe? Maybe dark energy fundamental for multiverse. Outside universe dark energy might have the magnitude calculated to have inside universe, only inside universe something is reducing dark energy to almost zero, perhaps dark matter or quantum gravity?
The answer to the ultimate questions, like Lisa asking why is gravity significantly weaker than the other forces, is simply that it has to be that way for the whole thing to work. They don't like that answer because of what it implies, but also keep in mind that the universe doesn't care if you like it or not.
Hello what would the answer be ? and what would it implies? and wow how come you know so much? I am still trying to work it out how did you find the answer talk soon
What’s outside of a black hole then
@@rachaelcarroll8718 Seek in the Realm of Intelligent Design
That it works the way it does is the outcome, not the source of it 😅
I am a practical scientist, according to my university. Nonetheless, I see Dr Randall as not only one of most brilliant people I've ever experienced, but at the same time just the hottest chick I've ever had the opportunity to see virtually. Massachusetts is way far from Arizona. Alas, I will have to move on.
we all have question...what to what...what of what...which of what...no sen of all...
Oh my gosh Lisa. You are so 🔥 I teach Electrotechnology for a living. You are my soul mate 😊
I like to build up from things we can see, like dark matter and gravity and strings... lol
A level headed scientist, Lisa may be able to break the puzzle.
One of the things I think of while laying down to sleep, is the weak gravity situation. It is said to be due to the fact that the majority of the power goes into higher dimensions.
We have proof that there are UAPs that defies gravity, including allowing these objects to travel hypersonic speeds and making immediate turns, which is not possible with our current knowledge of them. I often ponder if these objects are tapping into the gravity that are in the higher dimensions.
Dark energy is the space-time of our universe being drawn and stretched into the non-space-non-time outside our universe.
dark energy is a missunderstanding of physics today.
My ex used to call me dark energy cause of how I put it down in the bedroom
I think it’s possible that dark matter and energy exists both in the universe and on the outside. Otherwise black holes wouldn’t actually make any sense to how they work.
A plasmatic universe.
‘Plasma’ is the first state of matter.
Not only does the evidence overwhelmingly compel the conclusion that everything that we can see out there in the greater universe (not to omit right here in our own solar system) is none other than vast swathes of plasma simply doing its stuff - to coin a phrase - but plugging plasmatic equations into the picture completely does away with both dark matter and dark energy.
For an introduction to the physics of a plasmatic cosmology, go to Thunderbolts Project. For one of their most recent videos ruclips.net/video/QNOk9y_E41I/видео.html
Plasma - is matter in its first state. Plasma can quite easily and quite simply (relatively speaking, that is) do everything that physicists and cosmologists currently require dark energy and dark matter accomplish.
Mind you, a plasmatic universe not only has no dark matter or any dark energy, but it has no black-, or white-, holes either - nor a Big Bang. It’s a steady state universe.
Among other things to consider is the fact that ‘light’ being lensed or bent around the Sun - or around a galaxy - is, after passing through the more rarified regions of inter-stellar or inter-galactic space, not being bent by ‘warps’ in spacetime, but is merely being refracted in the usual, common, everyday way by none other than the halo of significantly denser material hovering around the larger body in the light’s pathway, and is so in precisely the same way that a ray of light passing through any denser material here on Earth is simply refracted in this well-known way. (Continues below)
plasma is like whater in the sea in our planet, plasma is the light neutral state, the positive state is light that come out from the stars ar any system even us, the 3th state is light refracted by the systems including olanets mass, light refracted as I see is CMB so is the one that makes the centripetal push to matter provoking gravity, there are other factors that make matter to stick togather as it is ENTANGLEMENT.
When Einstein invented his theories of gravity in which mass bent/warped space time, IT WAS NOT KNOWN THAT THERE ARE REGIONS OF DENSER MATERIAL HOVERING AROUND ALL OF THE LARGE BODIES IN THE UNIVERSE which quite routinely REFRACT any light passing through them as the light transitions from the more rarified regions of space and then back out again.
In a plasmatic universe gravity plays a greatly, greatly reduced role as it is many, many orders of magnitude weaker than the electromagnetic forces which power, well, everything.
Lisa speaks of desiring more explanatory alternatives. Be careful what you wish for if you are unwilling to consider an alternative outside mainstream physics and cosmology where currently only the lunatic fringe dwells ...
Just saying.
There are diferent levels of electromagnetism that refracts light, electromagnetism is the mayor cause of light refraction wich produces gravity, light refraction to me is cmb and is the one that makes a centripetal push to matter.
Human knowledge came a long way, just imagine explaining all this to any known animal, they have no idea how complicated knowledge about the world is and how much we know about their species. Biggest achievement in entire history must be establishment of global scientific community, since then nobody knows the same things and everybody is building same crappy cars. Scientists obviously understand much more than it seems, everybody is staring at smart phones this days, pinnacle of modern technology, available to every single individual. We hold a thin plate in our hands and enjoy knowledge, arts, culture, play games like virtual avatars and communicate with people all around the globe, like time and space are same for everybody and connected trough artificial luminous ether. Science works.
Except it doesn't, not really, we are still locked inside our natural body and live almost the same way as always, just tools are a bit different and we can route more natural energies, but it's all an illusion in the end. Machines malfunction, brake and deteriorate, heat up because of inefficiency and even if they do work, it's not what we really want from life. We live in a global utopia, conceived by ancient occult mysticism and ideology. Those were fine millennia ago, when nobody could imagine such a bright world, but now when everybody can finally use all that magic, things seems somehow shallow, fragile, flawed or plane boring. There must be more to this universe than what we know.
yes but we are closer to the truth every day, do,do,da,da thats all i want to say to you.
Xspot box yep. Agree. Here we are on the cusp of peak knowledge and it’s like we just give it all a sideways nod, butt out our cigarette and wander off to work with barely a whistle. Is it ennui, a chronic state of bored indifference or have we missed something important? Your spelling needs attention too.
@@rossmcleod7983 anlist physics is gone the wrong way to me. They try to see smaller and smaller things in one side while the universe can brake them in to trilliones each time smaller and smaller, if you see colors as elements they departure from 3 that are red,yellow and blue, this 3 brake into 6, 6 brake into 12, 12 into 24 and so on, do you think we can bit nature? of course not, anlist not to me.
@@rossmcleod7983 I have an idea, how about we invent global English and use it as universal language, so all people could understand each other and we can became as gods. That should be fun for some time.
Xspot box don’t be upset, I was just taking the piss, but you’ve touched on something there. Here we are approaching god head status - ‘we are the universe becoming aware of itself’ and we couldn’t give a collective flying fuck. I find that profoundly odd.
The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork. Day to day pours out speech, and night to night reveals knowledge. Psalm 19:1-2
go to churge dude.
Idiot
Given Science has Allowed the Big Bang Theory to Progress through the Global Community without Disclosure of Missing Facts.
Given this Science Precedent, Then Promoting the Possibility of Multiple Universes is a Reasonable Follow on.
Lisa, you so beautiful come to papa
Future significant interviews should include Brian Greene and Sam Harris.
Babe .
We know nothing
Dark matter and dark energy are simple to understand and explain. Quantum gravity may take an hour to explain to these schmucks, but it is rather simple as well.
Marry me
But he is too elder than you bro