Размер видео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показать панель управления
Автовоспроизведение
Автоповтор
I'm pretty sure the definitions of cos z and sin z are based on the identity and this is just circular reasoning hence not being a valid proof. A taylor series proof is a much better way to prove this.
Bro proved nothing 😭
It is true for all real numbers but you need to prove it for Complex numbers.
@@saj_f0 Nah, this proof is valid for all complex numbers. The problem is, he began with a definition that gets us to the outcome pretty quickly.
Just plug it in the exp(x) power series lil bro
Who let this third grader on RUclips and make math videos?Bro this is a circular argument....
I'm pretty sure the definitions of cos z and sin z are based on the identity and this is just circular reasoning hence not being a valid proof. A taylor series proof is a much better way to prove this.
Bro proved nothing 😭
It is true for all real numbers but you need to prove it for Complex numbers.
@@saj_f0 Nah, this proof is valid for all complex numbers. The problem is, he began with a definition that gets us to the outcome pretty quickly.
Just plug it in the exp(x) power series lil bro
Who let this third grader on RUclips and make math videos?
Bro this is a circular argument....