2015 Glacier Bay 1.0 Gpf Tests

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 авг 2022
  • • 2016 Glacier Bay Flush...
    • 2016 Glacier Bay HET P...

Комментарии • 57

  • @SCbusloverevelyn4247
    @SCbusloverevelyn4247 8 месяцев назад +1

    Congratulations for actually having bowl rinse, Glacier Bay.

  • @splumbing9130
    @splumbing9130 Год назад +1

    Better than my 0.8Gpf Niagara Stealth "toilets"

  • @masterflush5676
    @masterflush5676 Год назад +1

    When you stood far away in front of the toilet in the beginning of the video, the trapway looked so flat. Lol.

  • @ctfplumbing4910
    @ctfplumbing4910 Год назад +1

    Awesome toilet!

  • @cameraredeye3115
    @cameraredeye3115 Год назад +2

    That bowl rinse and performance is surprisingly good, given that it's a flat gallon toilet. But yeah, it needs a little more water to be great...

  • @charlesrodriguez7984
    @charlesrodriguez7984 Год назад +2

    It seems like it performs well for how little water it uses. My biggest concern is the drain line carry. 1.6 and 1.28 ones have better pipe carrying because of more water.

  • @normanreynolds9889
    @normanreynolds9889 Год назад +1

    The toilet did good, but it was decent enough

  • @AlanXenos
    @AlanXenos Год назад +2

    For 1 gallon it's not too bad, but I'd be worried about drain line carry flushing solid waste. Could cause clogs down the sewer line.

  • @Supcharged
    @Supcharged Год назад +2

    It’s honestly better than the vast majority of the toilets you’ve tested if you just force it to use more water. How many can actually take the towel and bag together regardless of water usage? Most would just overflow.

  • @MrBrombomb
    @MrBrombomb Год назад +3

    It seems like the short flush ruins everything in this toilet. Performance overall on this toilet would be greatly increased by it using 1.28 gpf or 1.6 gpf.

  • @VMUTplumbing
    @VMUTplumbing Год назад +1

    Yeah, this thing is pretty bad but I’ll still take a chance more than some modern toilets though. So yeah, the water usage on 1.28 would be durable but not by much since I’m not a fan of either of them as well.

  • @oddlysatisfyingcontent3261
    @oddlysatisfyingcontent3261 Год назад +1

    Better than the ProFlo I filmed

  • @californiatoileteditor8818
    @californiatoileteditor8818 Год назад +1

    5:01 That’s why I don’t like Glacier Bay toilets

  • @gmartcharb
    @gmartcharb Год назад +1

    We used to have a glacier bay that flushes exactly like that but then we got rid of our bathroom and built a new bathroom and got a Tuscany dual flush😩

  • @Subby_525
    @Subby_525 Год назад +1

    Wait, isn't this the one that VFT Plumbing & Fixtures recorded that was partially clogged? Or a different model?

  • @cooperschwartz318
    @cooperschwartz318 Год назад +1

    I would adjust the flapper to 10 or cover the hole on the bottom of it with tape and raise the water line

    • @OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations
      @OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations  Год назад

      I set the water level higher when I restored it.

    • @cooperschwartz318
      @cooperschwartz318 Год назад +1

      @@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations ok

    • @cooperschwartz318
      @cooperschwartz318 Год назад +1

      @@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations the flapper has a small hole on the bottom of it, and that’s how it fills up with water and shuts really early, if you put duct tape over it, the flapper shuts when the water level gets really low in the tank

    • @OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations
      @OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations  Год назад

      @@cooperschwartz318 You can also turn them to block the hole, they're adjustable

    • @cooperschwartz318
      @cooperschwartz318 Год назад +1

      @@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations ik

  • @MrBrombomb
    @MrBrombomb Год назад +1

    This toilet is definitely worth restoring while changing out the flush valve & raising the waterline a tad. Then it will be an excellent performer. It seems that any toilet designed to flush on 1 gpf or less is an utter failure.

    • @OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations
      @OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations  Год назад

      Definitely and that's exactly what I did

    • @MrBrombomb
      @MrBrombomb Год назад +1

      @@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations I know this might be a dumb question, but did the flush performance improve greatly after you did that?

    • @OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations
      @OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations  Год назад

      @@MrBrombomb Yep

    • @jbsimmons54
      @jbsimmons54 2 месяца назад +1

      ​@@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations
      Once your generation learns to tell particular govt agencies to STFU and stop passing ridiculous guidelines and laws (which is all they know how to do, sans expertise most of the time), then you will gain control over your environment and where and what you spend your $$$ on.

    • @OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations
      @OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations  2 месяца назад +1

      @@jbsimmons54 People need to open their eyes

  • @NyxKemo
    @NyxKemo 5 месяцев назад

    No toilet should be less than 2 gallons, low water usage just causes problems, i have my Elliston on around 2 Gallons with the normal flapper and it’s flawless

    • @OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations
      @OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations  5 месяцев назад +2

      These new ultra high efficiency aka high maintenance toilets need to be discontinued once and for all

    • @NyxKemo
      @NyxKemo 5 месяцев назад

      @@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations absolutely

  • @taronjeroneharris1313
    @taronjeroneharris1313 Год назад +1

    The toilet is cute, but that particular brand sucks.😝

  • @oaktree6986
    @oaktree6986 Год назад +1

    It did good but this toilet still kinda sucks

  • @erickmorton8085
    @erickmorton8085 Год назад +1

    I hate it

  • @Flushfax
    @Flushfax Год назад +1

    Junky!