Did Jesus Fulfilling the Law Abolish It?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- Did Jesus Abolish The Law When He Fulfilled It? You may have heard that Jesus abolished the ten commandments. However, lets examine what it really means that the commandments were fulfilled in Jesus.
#sda #seventhdayadventist #AmazingFacts #PAconference #Sabbath #tencommandments #law #Christianity #apologetics #SDAsermons #turningpointusa #sabbathworship #sabbathsda #sdachurch #adventistas #seventhdayadventist #3angelstv #prophesyagain #christiansongs #sermons #jesus #christ #christianmusic
Thank you brothers. I lam blessed by your channel. Praise God by your ministry!!
Keep it up brothers
This is a great truth revealing biblically!
Keep up the great studies
Ask a New Covenant Christian what is/are the substance/substances of the New Covenant.
A covenant is simply an agreement, and the substance of the Old Covenant is the Ten Commandments. God laid them out as the items He and Mankind were agreeing to. God wrote them Himself and presented them to Mankind(Israel) and Mankind agreed to the terms.
Now when God made the New Covenant, did He change the substance of the Old Covenant? If He did, where did He list the items of this New Agreement?
Did God change the substance of the Old Agreement or did He improve on the terms, making it easier for us to benefit from it?
The Ten Commandments stand or fall together because all Ten make up the Law of Love
Don't be deceived
You'd expect for the New Testament to outlive the terms had the substance changed, the same way the Old Testament clearly did. But that's not what we see. No where does the NT say, "Here are the new terms under this new covenant." NO, rather, the NT quote from the Old Testament and only says the terms are now to be written in the heart. Same terms, different location.
If you were reading the bible carefully, you would know what a covenant is. It is not simply an agreement. It can be a promise. When God cut a covenant with Abraham, it did not involve Abraham's agreement. The Lord alone walked between the pieces of meat. Therefore, The Lord alone was responsible for upholding the covenant. And you should stop this nonsense, saying that God made the old covenant with mankind. Moses said to the children of Israel, "the Lord did not make this covenant with your father's, but with you who are alive today". That is why the first words of the covenant were "I am the Lord your God who brought YOU out of the land of Egypt....". And we read in Romans that the law and the covenants etc pertained to Israel, and that the Gentiles did not have the law, and in Ephesians we read that The gentiles were strangers from the covenants of promises. The new covenant is not the same old covenant with the difference being that the law is written on the heart. The new covenant is Christ. He is the meat that was cut, he is the guarantee, he is the substance, he is the law giver, he is the high priest, he is the sacrifices, the meat offering, the sin offering including the scapegoat, the Passover ,, he is the mediator, he is veil, he is the pot of manna, he is the feasts, he is the sabbath, he is the Lord.
@@AdventDefenseLeague oh really! Why do you think the second part of the bible is called the New testament. And why do you think Paul said that God made the apostles able ministers of the New Covenant 2 Corinthians 3:6. And what did he say They were ministering, 2 Corinthians 4:5-7. And did not Isaiah that God would give the servant, who is Jesus, for a covenant and the nations would wait on his Law(42:1-7). And have you never read Hebrews 9 and 10 is about. Can you tell me what in Paul's description of the new covenant is about the ten commandments.
@@damionnewsome4710 You have a lot of time on you hands to be commenting chunks of paragraphs all over our videos against a few sentences I post. Why don't you hop on to our live streams? I don't have the time to respond to every point in writing, but it will be much easier in video. This is the second invitation I send you. Come on! It will be fun and you can challenge me all you want. What do you say?
@@AdventDefenseLeague it's ok once you don't delete them, my comments may help someone to see through your lies. I would love to join your live interactions and put you to shame, but I can't, not for lack of will, but for other reasons.
👍
8:44 that's gem!!!!!!!!!
Good work, gentlemen. Praise God 👏
Hey y'all. I love your ministry. I watch most every episode, even if I don't usually comment. Thank you! I have a question off topic. Do you always have to use KJV? I don't use that version and it sometimes confuses me. Are you all KJV 'Only" or is that just preferred? Blessings and Luv
We're not KJV only, but we typically use that one or the NKJV. Thanks for the views!
Nice presentation!!!!
*The wrong understanding of the different Greek words used for “fulfil” has confused many people.*
*The Greek word “fulfil” (pleroo Strongs’ G4137) used in Matthew 5:17 means to obey the law to the full and to give the law its full meaning.*
*See the NIRV, CEV and Luke's account for the true meaning of fulfil.* The Contemporary English Version Bible says it best with, “I did not come to do away with them, but to give them their full meaning.”
*There is a Greek word “fulfilled” (sunteleo Strongs’ G4931) that is used in Mark 13:4 which does mean to “end completely,” “to destroy” etc,* - but note this is not the Greek word (pleroo) used in Matthew 5:17. - *And if it were, we would have many contradictions throughout the New Testament and here are just a few.* [Matthew 3:15; John 17:13; John 17:12; Romans 2:13; Romans 3:15; Romans 13:9; Romans 3:31; Romans 7:7; Romans 7:12; 2 Corinthians 10:6; Philippians 2:2; Colossians 1:25; 2 Thessalonians 1:11; 1 John 2:4; 1 John 5:2-3; Revelation 12:17; Revelation 14:12; Revelation 22:14].
We would also have several major contradictions in Matthew chapter 5 that are very obvious and really should require no explanations. *Consider the following examples and decide if they make any sense as this is what Jesus would effectively be saying if fulfilling the law ended the law.* Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to *DESTROY THE LAW* but I have come to *DESTROY THE LAW.* - *[So, how can the law be abolished when Jesus said He is not going to abolish it?].*
And now that I have fulfilled and abolished the law I said I am not destroying, I am telling you that till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall, that is, not even the crossing of a “t” or the dotting of an “i” is going to pass from the law that I am abolishing. - *[And how can the Commandments be abolished when Jesus said that not even the equivalent to a period or a comma is going to change from the law as long as heaven and earth are still here?]*
And since I, Jesus fulfilled the Ten Commandments and ended them, I am telling you that whosoever therefore shall *BREAK ONE* of these least Commandments shall be referred to as least by those in the kingdom, and since I am abolishing the law, I am telling you that you are now to *TEACH THE LAW* also that I am abolishing. *[And how can you break any one of the commandments if they are gone and how can you teach them if they are abolished?].*
You have heard before that *“THOU SHALL NOT KILL”* but now that I am fulfilling and hence ending the law, now I say that whosoever is *ANGRY* with his brother *WITHOUT A CAUSE* shall be in danger of the judgment and whosoever shall say you fool shall be in danger of HELL FIRE. And you have heard that it was said by them of old time, *“YOU SHALL NOT COMMIT ADULTERY”* but now I say unto you, that whosoever looks on a woman to lust after her has *COMMITTED ADULTERY* with her already in his heart.” *[How could the Ten Commandments be abolished when we find that Jesus raised the standard for obeying them?].*
*I do not see how anyone could conclude that fulfilling the law ends the law after careful exegesis of Matthew chapter five unless they are trying to avoid loving obedience to their Lord and Saviour.*
*It is my heartfelt prayer that no one would ever desire to do that as* Matthew 7:21-23 explains what Jesus will say to people who do so.*
*Several other scriptures use the same Greek word “fulfil” that is used in Matthew 5:17 and *IF it meant to bring to an end, then our “Joy,”[Jn 17:2] our “Righteousness,” [Mt **3:15**] the “Word of God,” [Col **1:25**] our “Obedience” [2 Cor 10:6] and other things [2 Thes **1:11**] would also be ended.* -- *This particular Greek word “fulfil” does not and cannot mean to bring to an end or destroy.*
*So, the true meaning of Jesus fulfilling the law is to obey it to the full and to give them their full meaning just as we saw Him do in the remainder of Matthew chapter 5.*
*The law of God is as immutable as His throne*. - *The elements of nature - the sun shining in the heavens and the solid earth upon which you dwell are God’s witnesses that His law is changeless and eternal [Matthew 5:18]*
🔥
Hello, thank you for your teachings. I am a new Seven Day Adventist I’m having a hard time understanding Matthew‘s 5:19 It clearly says the lest and the greatest in heaven, could you help me understand how one part of this verse is speaking about those in heaven, and the second part of the verse Which says in heaven but you’re saying they would not be in heaven , I’m confused on this thank you
My two cents on Matthew 5:17
Matthew 5
17 “Do not think that I have come to καταλῦσαι (katalysai) (loosen thoroughly) the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to (loosen thoroughly) them but to πληρῶσαι (plērōsai) (to fulfill, to complete; as in a legal contract) them.
(Care must be given to the chronology of the events. Because at the time the Christ said this he had not yet πληρῶσαι (plērōsai) fulfill-ed the law and the prophets. We should not confuse latter statements in the gospels or the letters that would refer to a period of time after he did fulfill the Laws of Moses (be keeping them) and the prophets (by at last but not least by saying he was thirsty causing them to give him vinegar to drink and fulfilling all that was written.)
Then three days and nights latter God raised him from the dead just as he had promised. And God gave to his Son all his authority and power. So now he is the Law - and the leader of a New Covenant. We are now under the Christ's Law. (which is even harder to keep) And when there is a new covenant made there will be changes made along with it. Namely having to do with the sacrifices and the priesthood. For under the Laws of Moses only a Levite could serve as a priest. So no one from the tribe of Judah could be high priest unless there was a change in the law. So God appointed him as priest in the order of Melchizedek - just as God spoke through his prophets. But our Lord did not come to καταλῦσαι (katalysai) (loosen thoroughly) but rather only to modify it for the purposes suited for the next age.
But ISAIAH 51:6 - Lift up your eyes to the heavens, and look upon the earth beneath: for the heavens shall vanish away like smoke, and the earth shall wax old like a garment, and they that dwell therein shall die in like manner: but my salvation shall be for ever, and my righteousness shall not be abolished.
It says that the heaven and earth shall pass away. Pls explain sir.
Why does Matthew 5:18 say”…till all be fulfilled”?
Judgments have been made and the glorification of the saved saints of the first resurrection have been gifted with eternal life.
Let's not act like we don't know the reason why modern day christians want to make the law of God void.
Its just because of one commandment😂
By declaring himself the one who has come to fulfill the law and the prophets, he declares himself to be the Son of God. Therefore, what he says in the mountain are the commands of God. So the commandments he is talking about here are those spoken in the mountain right there, not the commandments from mount Sinai.
Therefore you are saying Jesus destroyed the Law, which is the exact opposite of what Jesus said.
Isaiah 42:21
The LORD is well pleased for his righteousness' sake; he will magnify the law, and make it honourable.
@@thatnicekid04 did I say that be destroyed the law. Don't put words in my mouth. But I will say that he fulfilled the law, all of it. Now we keep his law. When you were reading Isaiah 42 did you notice that it says in verse 1-7 that the nations/isles will wait for his Torah/ law. And have you not read Hebrews 1 where Paul says that Jesus is the one now speaking. And God said in several places that we should hear him. Go and learn what his law is
@@damionnewsome4710 you may not use the exact words "destroy". But you are saying that we no longer follow God's Law but Jesus's Law instead. That is what destroying the law is.
Jesus's Commandments are His Fathers Commandments because they are one.
The New Covenant is God's Law in the Heart and Mind.
Revelation 14:12 says the Saints Keep the Commandments of God and the Faith of Jesus.
Sin is still the transgression of God's Law, and we are told not to do it.
Why do you make a distinction between God's Law and Jesus's Law? How are they different?
@@thatnicekid04 the distinction is made between the law of Moses and the law of Christ. I am under the law of Christ. One of your problems is that you don't understand that the law is not just ten commandments. And furthermore the Matthew 5 passage says the law and the prophets, which is in reference to the entire Jewish scriptures. But you forget that Jesus words were "Think not that I am come to destroy the law and the prophets". So if I am to go by your logic, christians must keep the law and the prophets, since it was not destroyed. Well guess what, I rather go with the teaching if the apostle Paul who says that the law was their schoolmaster to lead them to Christ. And when Christ appeared he was no longer under the law. It's ok, if you want to be a son of Hagar, I am a son of Sarah.
And are you also saying that Isaiah was wrong when he said that the nations would wait for the law of Christ Isaiah 42 1-7. And was he also wrong when he said that the servant(Jesus) covenant. Are you so bold as to create your own idea of what the new covenant is, when Isaiah already told us. And you disagree with the apostle of Jesus Christ who says that Jesus was the covenant by saying " a body hast thou prepared" (Hebrews). And you disagree with The Lord Jesus himself who broke the bread and said "this is my body which is broken for you...and this is the new covenant in my blood". It's ok, I will go with Isaiah, Paul and the Lord Jesus. You can keep your definition of the new covenant to yourself.