Julius Caesar
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 дек 2013
- Copyright disclaimer! I do NOT own this movie nor the image featured in the video. All rights belong to it's rightful owner/owner's. No copyright infringement intended. For promotional purposes only.
Кино
Attendance of ICSE 2025 Batch??? 🙂🙂
Here sir
Here
Here
Here
Here
Who are here from ICSE 2024-25 batch class 9th
Meh😂🥲
Which school 😂?
I am...😂
Me
Me
The message of this play is clear. All those who speak of themselves in the third person will be stabbed to death by their friends.
🤣🤣🤣
Oh no, Not the rock!
Dobby: 👁👄👁
But Caesar shall forth
Someone should inform Donald Trump of this. He more often than not speaks of himself in the 3rd person.
Good luck to most of you teens out there studying. I am simply here to enjoy such a wonderful film.
🙏🏽
Same. Nothing like good old Shakespeare to watch on a Saturday evening
Me, a fourteen year old nerd who hasn't yet studied Shakespeare in school: Okay, read and watched Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, King Lear, now I'm going to watch Julius Caesar!
Same!
okay
anyone else sophomore english?
For finals
Freshman English, actually
@@ultimatekunochi6577 Get in touch when tired doing ur homework! cheru2022@gmail.com
@@kushalaluru9552 Tired doing ur homework? get in touch, cheru2022@gmail.com. cheers!
Eighth grade
"He spoke greek"
"And what did he say?"
"It was greek to me🙂"
This has meme energy😂😂
Yup. It's still a common expression in English--it came straight from this play.
i wonder if in shakespeare's day it was a joke.
Whoever came up with the intro, the skeleton husk of a centurion on the littered battlefield at Munda rasping "Hail Ceasar" giving way to the pomp of the Triumph in Rome, was a genius!
It really does sum up the man who was Julius Caesar. His pomp and extravagance, shown in the triumphant procession, was really built on the corpses of countless soldiers who happened to cross his path. A great man, with a bloody legacy.
Act 1, Scene 1 - 4:45 - 6:49
Act 1, Scene 2 - 6:50 - 20:32
Act 1, Scene 3 - 20:33 - 25:00
Act 2, Scene 1 - 25:01 - 35:24
Act 2, scene 2 - 35:25 - 43:45
Act 2, Scene 3 - 43:46 - 43:59
Act 2, Scene 4 - Not in this movie
Act 3, Scene 1 - 43:50 - 1:01:45
Act 3, Scene 2 - 1:01:46 - 1:18:32
Act 3, Scene 3 - 1:18:33 - 1:18:57
Act 4, Scene 1 - 1:18:58 - 1:20:41
Act 4, Scene 2 - 1:20:42 - 1:21:29
Act 4, Scene 3 - 1:21:30 - 1:32:49
Act 5, Scene 1 - 1:32:50 - 1:39:28
Act 5, Scene 2 - 1:40:04 - 1:40:27 (Battle scene from 140:27 -141:14 Brutus vs. Octavius)
- Act 5, Scene 1 - 1:41:15 - 1:42:11 (Cassius quotes a line from the end of Act 5, Scene 1)
- (Battle from 1:42:12 - 1:45:11 Cassius vs. Antony)
Act 5, Scene 3 - 1:45:11 - 1:49:30
Act 5, Scene 4 - 1:49:31 - 1:49:50
Act 5, Scene 5 - 1:50:30 - 1:55:25
Thank you
You are the best
THANK YOU
I love you
Thank you so much
The conspirators' fatal error was in not killing Anthony as well as Caesar. Brutus should've listened to Cassius!
@2mwillis Decimus had a group of gladiators just outside of the Curia, they could have handled him if given the order.
It was agreed that only Caesar was to be killed. The conspirators themselves saw to it that Antony was spared. Essentially, the argument was that their assassination of Caesar was not to be seen as a purge (killing all the caesarian leadership), but a surgical removal of rot at the heart of roman politics. If Caesar was dead, then everything else, including convincing Antony to help restore the republic, was supposed to be easier. If they did decide to kill Antony (and perhaps Lepidus), they would forever politicize the assassination as anti-Caesarian rather than anti-authoritarian. This is an important distinction because Caesarian reforms were very polular at the time and repealing them too quickly would cause riots. They needed some of the Caesarian leadership to come on board to restore the republic.
@Snaggle Toothed
Correct me if I'm misunderstanding you;
You are right to assume that the liberators would have wanted to replace Caesar. Among the 60 or so conspirators, there was a significant number of them that wanted to kill Caesar, Lepidus, and Antony in one go. Generally, they were split between former Caesarians (wanted to only kill Caesar to kill a tyrant and begin to *normalize* the republic) and former Pompeiians (wanted to kill Caesar and his leadership and *take control of the government*). Ultimately it was Brutus who convinced them to only kill Caesar for the reasons I already stated. They could have killed them, but they just didn't. The gladiators were there just in case the conspirators messed up.
Brutus made quite foolish decisions. Brutus did not respect Cassius at all, we can see this especially in the argument part. Brutus had two chances to avoid everything that happened in the second half of the movie. He could have listened to the other conspirators and killed Mark Antony, and he could have just not let Antony say his speech at Caesar's funeral.
1:55:00 Is any man ALONE capable of ruling the world or even a nation, with justice?
When a movie and play has caused many people to question themselves, you start to realise that this is a masterpiece.
I took Shakespeare Studies for four terms in Advanced English with Donald O'Hagan, the honored head of the English Department at Dearborn High School, in Dearborn, Michigan, just outside of Detroit, which was one if the top 10 high schools in the United States back in 1974, n 1975! I have an existing passion that stems from these classes n this teacher who made an EXTREMELY virulent impression on my life n my future due to his magnificent teaching methods. I am watching this at 66 yrs old because I have an innate passion for Sir William Shakespeare n do so love and enjoy anything of his writing to this day!!! With these exquisite actors playing these historical roles so brought to the common publics attention by Sir William Shakespeare's writing makes this performance one of the BEST ever in Hollywood History!!! Thank you for sending this heralded performance to me this lonesome Springtime Saturday afternoon to resurge my reason for enjoying life, which, at this old n decrepit age, sometimes escapes me. Thank you for posting!!
*Antony starts speaking at Caesar's funeral*...* the Conspirators*...Oh Sh-
Lets go I'm watching this for sophomore English and doing it for homework
same🙁
same
SAME >:
i got a 56
Jeff Phan same😂
Casca looked confused the whole time
No, just clever. A player with words. Actually one of Robert Vaughan's fine roles, capturing the slitheriness of Casca. Of course he went on to play Napoleon Solo, a wonderful role!
@@paulsomers6048 dang, that's smart
Mark Antony well played ... Hats off to Shakespeare
Welcome person watching this for English class! join the club
Hello this is boring 😑😑😑
Hey! Looks like a lot of people are watching this... I'm only a few minutes in and i already hate
Welcome!! Be intetested, wise & learnèd.
@@michaelvaldez4489 written by the greatest playwrite in history about some of the greatest achieving men in history. Try to find something in it.
thanks for inviting me! hope this is as good as the Odyssey
Love Charlton Heston. One of my all time favorite Actors.
One of my favorites, thank you for posting.
My tenth grade English teacher showed my class this movie! Also gave us extra credit for showing up to class in togas for the stabbing scene.
Mark Antony speech is just😮
i know this was posted 9 years ago but i still loved thanks for posting
Thanks so much for uploading this excellent film - I have been looking for it for years on the web somewhere, but now at last I have found it amongst other Shakespeare gems on your channel.
My teacher’s name who gave me this is literally Mr. English
Whoa really? Mine too! That's so cool!
Connor Ensley you think they might be the same???
Nick Redden hmmmm
Connor Ensley hmmm
@@nickredden8248 that would be so weird!😂
All hail Richard Johnson as Cassius ....He was the best of the bunch.
Chuck gives a fine performance here
-but his wig is ridiculous.
For anyone wondering, the Mankiewicz, 1953 version of this play with Brando is free on Internet Archive. It's definitely the superior version IMO. No weak spots in the cast (Unlike here with Robards, who's the lead, reading his lines like a 3rd grader presenting in front of class), good direction, excellent score by the composer to "Ben Hur". The first half in particular is AMAZING, the tension is extremely palpable - You feel the fear and dread of Caesers regime, You feel the fear and uneasiness of the conspirators, and You feel the fear and sorrow of Caeser's wife. Great Film!
(Also, I think far too many lines of the play have been cut in this version compared to the 1950s one)
Totally agree,the 1953 version is better.Inf as a hollywood adaption,it is the best of the Shakesperean plays.
Followed by Henry V.Richard the Third ( Olivier) and the Jon Finch version of Macbeth 1968.
Julius was very much loved by the people and I am blessed to have been born in July. I have always admired Shakespearean-trained actors.
Et tu, Brute? 😭
This is absolute vedio I search to watch for my exam but it's very emotional to watch rather than reading in book..
adore to William Shakespeare🙏❤
Why sir, cobble you - best lines ever
Sophomores where you at
gotta write an essay for this 😖
Gotta write an essay about the theme, aMBiTioN
What age are you all of here?
Outstanding! Thanks for posting this!
Not bad. I went and saw this at the movie theater in the 60's or70's as a kid. Seeing it this time, I have to say that Jason Robards was a pretty lifeless Brutus (too serious/gloomy) except for a couple of scenes. Overall though, I think it was a great version of Shakespeare. I understood this today a lot better than I did as a kid - I remember having a hard time following the dialogue and thinking I should have looked for a better movie. I also recall really being impressed with the assassination scene. I went home and told my mother about it like she had never heard of Julius Caesar before. Haha, just remembering all that made it doubly worth watching this movie again.
I know this sounds weird but thank you sharing that story. For some reason it strongly reminded me of my youth and causes a brief smile to occupy my face.
TedBronson1918 did I ask?
@@alliehenricksen3810 did he ask you to reply?
Allie Henricksen get roasted
I think Jason Robards is a bit wooden in some scenes, but overall pretty good.
This more than 6 year old video has been re-introduced because of the school system being like "yes that looks good do these vague questions about this old movie"
I need to watch this as my English homework 😰😰😰😰
Sammee
Same & I hate it
Poor thing...
Yes
Suck it Pleb!!
POV: you don’t understand anything and you’re doing this for class 🤩
Truly, How Refreshing. The brilliance of the Playwright and the remarkable cast. Rivetting!
wow!.. beautiful print.. thank u!!!
The closing shot is like a beautiful renaissance painting!
Thanks for uploading this.
Who else is watching this for school lmao? Also why tf do they talk so seriously I didn’t imagine them like this when I read it lmao.
It's a tragedy, hardly a light drama.
Wow. This is a great find. Old school forever
Gielgud once as Caesar, and years before as Cassius. Seamless. He's meant for roles like these.
I knew it he's the Cassius in 1953
Great classic movie with an all star casts!!!
Excellent I have watched it these three times or more
But why does Caesars wife look like she's straight out of Whoville
Because the Romans recently conquered whoville probably, after they wiped out the smurfs of course
We had to watch apart of it sophomore year but then I watched the entire movie myself. I've been coming back to it here and there ever since.
10th grade was my Vietnam.
Thanks for posting this!
thanks for the upload . Great film!
Note to all the High School sophomores suffering through this version for class. I had to watch this for my Sophomore English class...in 1980. I survived it-you will too. And once you finish it, go watch both seasons of HBO's "Rome," which will cure you of the misconception that "history is boring."
And once you hit your 40's you'll realize there's a reason why Shakespeare has endured in the culture for the last 450 years....
This play is not about history; it's about lust for power and the conflict it engenders. It uses a version of history available in Shakespear's time only as the frame or setting.
I had this before since 2012-2013 English sophomore. To be fair I really like this movie in English class. I suffered from annoying Romeo Juliet shits and odyssey
Is History boring.....or Shakespeare?
I believed the movie starring James Mason and Marlon Brando was the best. But this is really the most challenging, engaging and deeply thought and performed representation of this drama I ever watched. Splendido, magnifico! Grazie infinite e un saluto dall'Italia! :)
I love they had John Gielgud as Caesar when he was Cassius in the movie with James Mason. I also consider the Brando one the best as well.
43:46 Christopher Lee
Why on Earth didn't Christopher Lee do more Shakespeare?
Ty 4 this video it really helped me in studying
The music when they offed him was spot on
This movie is a masterpiece .. my fave version of the monumental play..
Reliving my highschool English classes with this video. Good ol days
Thanks for uploading. ✌
Got to love grade 10 English.
10th grade was my Vietnam.
This Casca is my Casca. 😍
Thank you .. love the movie
Is it bad that I watch this for like...just for fun after reading the play? Any other weird nerds out there?
me
Heston and Vaughn are remarkable in their comprehension of the characters, story and context. Robards is a stump.
Hi
Heston outdid himself! And Robert Vaughn's facial expressions to accompany what he was saying were brilliant!
Yep, Robards is a dead stump.
I genuinely enjoy this play.
I love this play!!!
we watched this at school..it was pretty sad:~(
Ayy so did I.
This cat playing Cassius is brilliant. 👍 And of course, plenty of English accents in ancient Rome. The golden age of American Cinema. 😉
Curtis Whitehead Jr "This cat"? Have I slipped through a wormhole in the space-time continuum to the 1960s? Btw, the "cat" in question is Richard Johnson.
If anyone is seeking accuracy you'll be surprised at how many "liberties" they took in this production, all in the name of dramatics.
(I mean, that IS the whole point lol I do realize.)
It's true that Caesar publicly denied the crown three times when he came back from expanding the Roman Empire, when he learned that he was to be betrayed by Cato and Pompey, he made the choice to march on Rome with his legions in triumph only to protect himself, and not to take power like Sulla had only a couple decades earlier.
But, no Roman General had ever crossed the Rubicon without the intention of conquering Rome so that's why Cato convinced Pompey he was trying to crown himself like Sulla had.
But, Pompey and Cato fled before Caesar could return, and Caesar was named "Dictator for Life" by the Roman population anyway.
And was only betrayed and killed in the Senate chamber when the Senators started fearing again that he would become another tyrant.
Obviously, this is a dramatic retelling, loosely based on the actual events. I mean, that's the whole point lol and all I'm saying is that it's all it should be taken as; purely for entertainment value, rather than educational.
Pompey was betrayed by Ptolmey's Visiers and killed when he arrived in Egypt, after fleeing Rome when Caesar crossed the Rubicon, and Cato fell on his own sword when Caesar tracked him down in Utica.
It's true that Brutus was there during Caesar's murder, and was the hardest one for the conspirators to seduce to their side, but this shows the soothsayer warning Caesar, when in fact he warned Mark Antony about the Ides of March, not Julius Caesar himself as is shown in this production.
These subtleties, (and many more,) are minor indeed, but they're more than enough to make the difference between a passing and failing grade, if that's what you're watching this for.
I really hope that nobody is using this dramatization, which is based on the play, for their exams lol or passing a test.
A quick Wikipedia search will give you more accurate context of the events than this ever could.
Hell, most of the quick RUclips videos you can find would be more reliable narrators.
fuck thanks mehn i have a mid term tommorow and was about to watch it for understanding
But it’s based off the play by Shakespeare
@@princekunta but not accurate tho. I still watched it and enjoyed it
I'm watching it for the Shakespeare play lol
yeah if your watching for english class its perfect but if your watching for history class id watch crash course or something else
I saw this film in high school during my junior year. We were studying this play at the time.
thanks for such a goog movie im greatful
as im studying about julius ceasar
Makes me want to watch I Claudius once more.
Shout out to the people not here for class but because they love history !
You gotta check out the Historia Civillis Caesar series, this makes so much more sense after watching that.
@@mcleanb981 Good call seen every vid of his. Guy did the little boxes before it was cool. Now lets see if Ky Veech has anything of worth to add to this thread...
nah
Well this isn't necessarily history it's not really all that accurate
@@shmarkpark5268 3/10 should've started with a big fat "actually" to highlight the inflated sense of self also low scores because the logic breaks down when you think about it for more than 3 seconds.
Enjoy the cheescakes they look nice.
I fell asleep so quick watching this thanks..😳
Coments here are either people who are watching this for sophomore English, or people who actually watch the movie
I’m here for 8th grade
Excellent good on you! A masterpiece distributed freely the way it should be!
Although I am aware that some of the acting has been criticised in this film, I personally feel that it runs quite well. There is a juxtaposition between a very dynamic and animated style, with a very underplayed one.
I also love how the colours of the costumes stand against the subdued grey stone work of the Roman streets.
There certainly is much to admire about this version, but man, Robards' wooden Brutus just about wrecks the whole thing.
+Daniel Bran Griffith I just noticed that. Also, the Rome in, say, Quo Vadis and Demetrius & the Gladiators is a _lot_ more colorful. Here it's kinda dreary & depressing
+Chad Crabtree Eh, he seemed to play the reluctant traitor pretty well.
Daniel Bran Griffith open Bob
well said. imma use that for my essay.
Super.....
So Informative about Brutus Huge ROLE
Thanks so much for putting this on here! My students need a free version for this time of Corona.
Gielgud - ENOUGH SAID - LEGEND
Heston is great...Gielgud is also....Robards is robotic....but Robert Vaughn's is the standout performance here. Superb.
I agree!!!
Why cant hollywood make movies this good anymore?
Shakespeare, the Caesar of Literatre, thy words fly in the air like a spear, and shakes when it hit the target !!!
Ron Pember as the wise-cracking cobbler in the street early in this film, always reminds me of Lee van Cleef.
Richard Johnson looks ridiculous with that beard
the Senators that killed Julius Caesar were afraid and jealous of how much the people love Caesar feared that that love will ensure that he will declare himself King and absolute ruler but his death did not in that his great-nephew Octavian became the first official emperor
Trump might be in the same boat as Ceasar. Americans are the modern day Romans.
I agree. That Julius Caesar wanted to be king is absurd hence the reason for his murder has nothing to do with him being a tyrant. The reasons he was murdered are:
a)Although a Patrician by birth he was essentially a populist that wanted to improve the lot of Roman citizens and freed men,
b)He intended to break up the vast land holdings of a small number of hyper wealthy Patricians (buy using state funds to buy the land distribute land parcels to the unemployed.
c) Remove huge numbers of slaves from Rome and Italy itself to create opportunity for poor citizens and Freed men.
d) ensure that retired soldiers received their pensions and the land parcels (In Italy) they had been promised.
e) because the senate was loaded with corrupt Patrician senators he needed dictatorial powers to put them back on the path of serving Rome.
f) and of course because he had the power of the electorate behind him.
How exactly? Trump doesn't have the people behind him (currently only has an approval rating of about 40%) He does not have the mindset for politics that Caesar had. The only comparison is that they both see themselves as future kings.
Comparing Trump to Caesar? Get the fuck out of here with that shit. I bet you are American to say something like that.
Trump is more like Crassus or maybe Sulla if he’s anything
I can't help but thinking of Roland Barthes' "The Romans In Films" essay: "these gangster-sheriffs with the little Roman fringe" :)
I am here exactly because of this essay :)
A WONDERFUL PLAY GREATLY ACTED
35:02 When Brutus hugs Portia like that, I get all kinds of feels. Like, why can't someone hug me like that?
cause its a movie
Can you imagine the damage to his internal organs? *O O F*
Lovely ❤️❤️💕
Awesome!😊❤👍
Brutus shouldn’t have betrayed Caesar, Caesar vouched for his life when he was about to be executed by siding with Pompey in the fight and still Brutus was blind by his honor and killed the man who cared for him, Brutus should’ve been with Antony and Caesar
That's why the name Brutus will forever be synonymous with villain.
I see selfish fear and pride rather than honor. Am I wrong? I think that which Antony showed was more like honor.
I understans Brutus' actions. To me, Cassius is the real villain here. He knew that Brutus would betray Caesar if he believed he did it for the good of Rome. Cassius manipulated Brutus to not only betray and kill Caesar but to also become the face of the conspirators. Brutus saw his mistake in the end; while he still rejected Caesar's politics, he saw that the murder brought more misfortune than fortune to Rome. He murdered Caesar to protect the Republic but ironically the murder was the nail in the coffin for the Roman Republic and the start of the Roman Empire.
@@Simonsssssssss I´d say: great approach. Another point would be to fail in seeing the size of the whole, or its real essence. What was Rome, its people or its buldings? I just want to say that one gets caught in one´s own thoughts of reality and truth. Greetings.
Ami Contreras Barrutia this is why I love Shakespeare haha! Such different interpretations to the same material! I am in the beginning of my Shakespeare “journey” with only three plays read, but I am loving it so far!
There's a Lama at 3:55 ,did't realise the Romans got there before the Spanish!! Great film love Shakespeare.
This is my favorite version
Brutus giving off strong Rogal Dorn vibes, especially in His Rage.
Brutus makes the wrong decision at every turn in this play; shakespeare is clearly mocking him. The "noblest roman" line is the biggest joke of all...
He was noble in heart and in mind, he was brainwashed, but that does not excuse hun for his treachery.
Isaac Asimov comes to the same conclusion in his dissection of the play (see *Isaac Asimov's Guide to Shakespeare* - originally in 2 volumes, put out by Doubleday, 1970; combined volume, by Avenel, 1978). 🤓
For the watch......
awsome movie
Mark Antony: "...But Brutus says Caesar was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man."
*Crowd turns against the conspirators*
*Camera zooms in on Brutus' face*
*Curb Your Enthusiasm theme starts playing*
*Directed by Robert B. Weide*
He was the most noblest Roman of them all.....Marc Antony
to everyone who has to find Act 1, Scene 3, 20:33 is a good place to watch from
Saw this in theater back in the day. Almost all the principal actors are dead except Rigg and Chamberlain.
Bill B o
Anthony Murphy and
Bravo, Sir John!
excellent