Mam...Salman Rushdie is a genius literary master.....he is cosmopolitan universal (🌷Mid Night children.or 🌷 Enchantress of Florence)....he really deserve this award...love from Indian🌷
James Joyce, John Cowper Powys, Hans Henny Jahnn, Hermann Broch, Nikos Kazantzakis, Alfred Doblin, Cormac McCarthy, Robertson Davies, Lawrence Durrell, etc - they all were a great writters. But they don't get Nobel Prize. How is that even possible?
It’s all about the country they’re from. Once in a while we throw some random that isn’t from europe or north america or even some guy that’s really famous world wide, but rarely someone who deserves it. Why choose Philip Roth for example, when there is Le Clezio
And the language they write in. I've little hopes of a work in my language getting a Nobel, however well-written it might be. European languages get an unfair advantage over other languages.
Those who reduce the decision of the Nobel Literature Jury to that of mere racism, and eurocentrism, you should replay 1:53, and try to sink the fact that the Jury is a collection of Writers from countries that aren't necessarily from Europe, and even those non-european writers look for, 'something more' than the excellent writing that's found in the world, something which couldn't be explained precisely.
I still don't get it , do they use some kinds of computer algorithms. Because nowadays, it's easy to fall down into the bubble that contains only the famous writers not the great writers. Every year around 500000-1000000 books gets published. I'm 200% sure, that every year, thousands of great books or literature masterpieces passes unnoticed, Like F.scott. Fitgerald, Leo Tolstoy and many other great writers from developing countries.
hello world, did you hear the swedish, literature committee member say that she reads every book written by each nominated writer, and makes judgments about the excellence and uniqueness of each person's writing? do you think that a computer algorithm can do that?
Out of the lingual abundance The flawed matrimony of meanings and words The best hybrid you can divorce is Silence And the worst. It is your only possession private You have no title over the multiple rest. It is the worst conclusion you can arrive at And the best.
Hello! Thanks for explaining how you think. I’m feeling intrigued by your choice to focus on literary merit. I’m a bookworm, and what I look for primarily is ethics. If there’s beauty and creativity in writing, then it is a real pleasure to read. I think the choice of moral dilemmas is important to help us think about a chaotic world. If the writer has a destructive worldview, no amount of literary excellence does it for me. I just think that can make the literature more harmful. There is one popular book in France. A lot of people love it for its’ beauty, romance and literary artistry. But if you have just a little bit of insight into how women have been treated throughout history, the story reads as a pretty toxic and even dangerous relationship. But because it is perceived as beautiful, many people buy into it. What do you, Nobel Prize committee, think about this? I’d be happy to know.
4:56 min ... makes me think of the idea of three dimensional chess ... for some reason, a little earlier today, I was thinking about ... multiple layers of simultaneous comprehension, suspended in air, without possibility, of anything, in of itself, that might resolve, and yet, overall, needed, to arrive at a simple conclusion, not simplistic, to harness, an open ended array, of depth and breadth, contained, in a single breath.
I don't think that's true. There you have the examples of Doris Lessing, with an entire saga dedicated to a sci-fi story, and Kazuo Ishiguro, whose novels have gone from a Sci-fi standpoint (as in Never let me go or Klara and the sun) to pure rooted fantasy (The buried giant). I'd even argue that, a writer a like way more as José Saramago, has a literary corpus composed primarily by fantasy, thriller and imaginative plots.
A person who is going to live for only 50 years, 40s are their peak of the life, why cant they win Nobel? I think age is just number, its only the experience one can learn from. :)
you can't select one winner for winner a noble prize in a year at any subject.million excellent people all over the world is extraordinary. Try to enhance number of extraordinary people’s in your prize.thanks
I d.like to introduce myself as a.firstly as a sibyl, which is a history.making wooman. Some people.are.telling.me I.am a.good writer.and.my writing on painting and my book to be the.best.book they.ever.read. I wonder how to keep my head above ground on a computer, a labtop. Do you have any ideas.how to.keep my words and computer.above.the.ground?
The Nobel Prize in Literature has no validity or meaning. Philip Roth was overlooked even though he was maybe the best writer in the world at the time.
Some witters are not proposed for Nobel. You can't self proclaim for a Nobel. And it's not only Europe. My country is from Europe and didn't won a single Noble prize. And we had some amazing writers that were proposed but didn't win, that weren't proposed at all... So are things that count more for the comity then the county you are from.
''Said very good things. Thank you. But there are a few things to say to you. Most countries have regional languages. Writers in those languages are working tirelessly. Why do not you care about their efforts. Translating works into regional languages is financially difficult for writers. Loss. In fact your help is definitely needed for such people. But you do not realize it. You should recognize the literature of backward regional languages. Or set up 'another special award' for the same. Only then is the true validity of the Noble ideas. Take India for example. There are many regional languages like Telugu, Hindi, Tamil, Bengali, Kannada, Malayalam ... Great literature is emerging. In fact, after Rabindranath Tagore, another ten awards should really come to India. You do not recognize regional languages .It's very painful. In fact, Telugu is a regional language in India. As a writer in that language I have written over a hundred stories. 20 books arrived. You can check my profile on Wikipedia. I worked very hard. In fact, if I had been born in Europe, I would have been nominated for the Nobel Literature Prize.''-Print out my opinion on the wall of the Noble office room. The world knows the truth. Thank you.
They never claimed that they're obliged to recognize languages, and the efforts of writers in every language. I'm a Telugu speaking person, and I find it rather silly that you're saying your work needs to be taken to the committee just because you've written it. If I, as a native Telugu speaker, don't know of your existence myself, what makes you think that your work is so revolutionary as to be discussed by some Swedish Laureate?
![Eminem - Houdini [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/22tVWwmTie8/mqdefault.jpg)
Mam...Salman Rushdie is a genius literary master.....he is cosmopolitan universal (🌷Mid Night children.or 🌷 Enchantress of Florence)....he really deserve this award...love from Indian🌷
What a woman!! Thank you very much
This time give award to Indian writer. At least 10 writers are eligible candidates.
Very effective information
Thank you Nobel Prize for posting this video.
October 7th.
Amazing
Is there a way to Send you works..
Worth watching.
This was beautiful and eye opening
Wow. Thank you for such an intresting insight.
James Joyce, John Cowper Powys, Hans Henny Jahnn, Hermann Broch, Nikos Kazantzakis, Alfred Doblin, Cormac McCarthy, Robertson Davies, Lawrence Durrell, etc - they all were a great writters. But they don't get Nobel Prize. How is that even possible?
True words . 🙏🌺🌹💐
I want to compete for the noble prize in literature, please tell me the way
It’s all about the country they’re from. Once in a while we throw some random that isn’t from europe or north america or even some guy that’s really famous world wide, but rarely someone who deserves it. Why choose Philip Roth for example, when there is Le Clezio
And the language they write in. I've little hopes of a work in my language getting a Nobel, however well-written it might be. European languages get an unfair advantage over other languages.
The prize has no validity or meaning if it was not given to Philip Roth, who was without doubt one of the best living writers at the time.
@@holliswilliams8426 sorry roth never won the nobel price
Can one send their novels... And can one send if its not a best seller
Those who reduce the decision of the Nobel Literature Jury to that of mere racism, and eurocentrism, you should replay 1:53, and try to sink the fact that the Jury is a collection of Writers from countries that aren't necessarily from Europe, and even those non-european writers look for, 'something more' than the excellent writing that's found in the world, something which couldn't be explained precisely.
It should be renamed as
Europian literature prize
90% are europian origin.
i heard 'To be a Laurate you need to be nominated at least twice.' Is it Mandatory? can anyone help me out in this doubt?
Cormac McCarthy
I am of class 9th and I want to nominate I have a great ideas of physics
You can!! Study hard! And they will see you with the prize
Thank you for your support
I will
Stop thinking and just give it to milan kundera
May you please read America and Life is funny by E.R Frank
I still don't get it , do they use some kinds of computer algorithms. Because nowadays, it's easy to fall down into the bubble that contains only the famous writers not the great writers. Every year around 500000-1000000 books gets published. I'm 200% sure, that every year, thousands of great books or literature masterpieces passes unnoticed, Like F.scott. Fitgerald, Leo Tolstoy and many other great writers from developing countries.
hello world, did you hear the swedish, literature committee member say that she reads every book written by each nominated writer, and makes judgments about the excellence and uniqueness of each person's writing? do you think that a computer algorithm can do that?
@@greentomato4632 well said!
I Anup Kumar is the new noble laureate of 2021
Anup Kumar, please spell Nobel correctly. I wish you well.
Out of the lingual abundance
The flawed matrimony of meanings and words
The best hybrid you can divorce is Silence
And the worst.
It is your only possession private
You have no title over the multiple rest.
It is the worst conclusion you can arrive at
And the best.
Hello! Thanks for explaining how you think. I’m feeling intrigued by your choice to focus on literary merit. I’m a bookworm, and what I look for primarily is ethics. If there’s beauty and creativity in writing, then it is a real pleasure to read. I think the choice of moral dilemmas is important to help us think about a chaotic world. If the writer has a destructive worldview, no amount of literary excellence does it for me. I just think that can make the literature more harmful. There is one popular book in France. A lot of people love it for its’ beauty, romance and literary artistry. But if you have just a little bit of insight into how women have been treated throughout history, the story reads as a pretty toxic and even dangerous relationship. But because it is perceived as beautiful, many people buy into it. What do you, Nobel Prize committee, think about this? I’d be happy to know.
4:56 min ... makes me think of the idea of three dimensional chess ... for some reason, a little earlier today, I was thinking about ... multiple layers of simultaneous comprehension, suspended in air, without possibility, of anything, in of itself, that might resolve, and yet, overall, needed, to arrive at a simple conclusion, not simplistic, to harness, an open ended array, of depth and breadth, contained, in a single breath.
Respect
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏✍️
Firstly they remove entire genres for consideration. Fantasy and sci-fi for example
Poorly written in general...
I don't think that's true. There you have the examples of Doris Lessing, with an entire saga dedicated to a sci-fi story, and Kazuo Ishiguro, whose novels have gone from a Sci-fi standpoint (as in Never let me go or Klara and the sun) to pure rooted fantasy (The buried giant). I'd even argue that, a writer a like way more as José Saramago, has a literary corpus composed primarily by fantasy, thriller and imaginative plots.
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝
A person who is going to live for only 50 years, 40s are their peak of the life, why cant they win Nobel? I think age is just number, its only the experience one can learn from. :)
Only the person's achievements count...
you can't select one winner for winner a noble prize in a year at any subject.million excellent people all over the world is extraordinary. Try to enhance number of extraordinary people’s in your prize.thanks
I want to get nobel prize in literature
I d.like to introduce myself as a.firstly as a sibyl, which is a history.making wooman. Some people.are.telling.me I.am a.good writer.and.my writing on painting and my book to be the.best.book they.ever.read.
I wonder how to keep my head above ground on a computer, a labtop. Do you have any ideas.how to.keep my words and computer.above.the.ground?
🤩
yet another year of Haruki Murakami being robbed of his prize
Just say that you want to hang out with the likes of Bob Dylan. It's just marketing and desperation to be relevant.
I hope the structural eurocentrism will be gradually erased from the Nobel Prize in Literature. I really do.
The Nobel Prize in Literature has no validity or meaning. Philip Roth was overlooked even though he was maybe the best writer in the world at the time.
Some witters are not proposed for Nobel. You can't self proclaim for a Nobel. And it's not only Europe. My country is from Europe and didn't won a single Noble prize. And we had some amazing writers that were proposed but didn't win, that weren't proposed at all... So are things that count more for the comity then the county you are from.
Stop worrying about the Oil and Just give it to Salman Rushdie. 🙄
''Said very good things. Thank you. But there are a few things to say to you. Most countries have regional languages. Writers in those languages are working tirelessly. Why do not you care about their efforts. Translating works into regional languages is financially difficult for writers. Loss. In fact your help is definitely needed for such people. But you do not realize it. You should recognize the literature of backward regional languages. Or set up 'another special award' for the same. Only then is the true validity of the Noble ideas. Take India for example. There are many regional languages like Telugu, Hindi, Tamil, Bengali, Kannada, Malayalam ... Great literature is emerging. In fact, after Rabindranath Tagore, another ten awards should really come to India. You do not recognize regional languages .It's very painful. In fact, Telugu is a regional language in India. As a writer in that language I have written over a hundred stories. 20 books arrived. You can check my profile on Wikipedia. I worked very hard. In fact, if I had been born in Europe, I would have been nominated for the Nobel Literature Prize.''-Print out my opinion on the wall of the Noble office room. The world knows the truth. Thank you.
What a great, amazing writer should have from your point of view?
They never claimed that they're obliged to recognize languages, and the efforts of writers in every language. I'm a Telugu speaking person, and I find it rather silly that you're saying your work needs to be taken to the committee just because you've written it. If I, as a native Telugu speaker, don't know of your existence myself, what makes you think that your work is so revolutionary as to be discussed by some Swedish Laureate?