$40 Brita Filter vs $500 RO Filter WHO WINS? (Laboratory Results)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024

Комментарии • 40

  • @GarytheWaterGuy
    @GarytheWaterGuy  9 месяцев назад +2

    Amazing results when using water filtration but which one is best for your family?

  • @AnanyaGupta
    @AnanyaGupta 4 месяца назад +1

    From what I understand, in a gallon of piped water, the RO process wastes 66% of it to get 33% usable water.

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  4 месяца назад +2

      Depends on the type of RO system, kind of like car gas mileage varies by vehicle. This video explains more ruclips.net/video/S17l3Tt6xS4/видео.html

  • @dngiovanni
    @dngiovanni 6 месяцев назад +2

    You should do this test again but using brita’s Elite water filter instead of the standard one

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  6 месяцев назад

      Why do you think the result would be any different?

    • @dngiovanni
      @dngiovanni 6 месяцев назад

      @@GarytheWaterGuy the brita elite has more certs: lead, mercury, cadmium (NSF/ANSI 53). Microplastics (NSF/ANSI 401). Certain pesticides and herbicides (NSF/ANSI 53) among other things its also certified by 3rd parties to reduce 3x more contaminants.

    • @CMDR_Birb
      @CMDR_Birb 5 месяцев назад +3

      @@GarytheWaterGuy The filter is different.

  • @pamsmith6998
    @pamsmith6998 9 месяцев назад

    Thank you, Gary. You offer great information, products, and help. Your tutorial on how to change the water filters saved me a bunch of money, and I did it in less than 30 minutes!

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  9 месяцев назад

      Excellent, glad to hear. Please shasre video with friends and family.

    • @chefgav1
      @chefgav1 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@GarytheWaterGuy you used the lowest quality brita filters.There top of range brita maxtra filters are much much better at filtering contaminants.

  • @cleanerpath94
    @cleanerpath94 3 месяца назад +1

    Hi Gary, could you explain why the Lead content @5:00 actually increased slightly when filtered through the Brita, and increased even more when filtered through the RO system. that just doesn't make sense to me haha. thank you for the video and I am looking forward to your response to this strange impurity result.

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  3 месяца назад

      Don’t really know. When I asked the lab they said it had to do with the very small amounts that were detected.

  • @danalaniz7314
    @danalaniz7314 Месяц назад

    Really good information but conclusion was obvious from start since the very capable presenter works for a dealer.

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  Месяц назад

      True, but the information is definitely worth sharing.

  • @Andrew-xw4zj
    @Andrew-xw4zj 3 месяца назад

    Don't RO systems also remove many of the beneficial minerals in water which can lead to mineral deficiencies?

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  2 месяца назад

      Check out this video ruclips.net/video/JOuE2U_oCPc/видео.html

  • @awd52chev96
    @awd52chev96 5 месяцев назад

    Why do think the lead level doubled through RO vs starting sample? Granted it is still a very small amount, but doubled all the same.

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  5 месяцев назад

      Great question. I think it is due to the testing process isn’t that accurate when you get to extremely low quantities

  • @davidwillkie
    @davidwillkie 9 месяцев назад

    Hey Gary, been going through all your videos trying to solve my water issue since our local plumbing / heating services by steinbach , Manitoba , can’t seem to solve them.
    My raw water hardness is 19 and iron is 4. After it goes through my Viqua softener it’s 0. Problem is after a few months my water started to stink and I’m getting staining. Call them back out they say no issues. What the heck? They then cranked my salt up to 100 hardness to try to fix the smell and taste. Tastes like metal! I’m also chewing through 5 bags of salt a month!
    Further investigation on my own , I checked my toilet tank which is a new toilet. Has a film and rust staining even after my water comes back at 0’s as of yesterday.
    I’m on well water. My conclusion is iron bacteria. My Viqua has a clorinator built in to turn salt into chlorine to disinfect. So I’m not sure if it’s just failing or there’s something else at play here.
    I’m not sure how to go about solving this and these guys don’t know what’s going on and they are supposed to be professionals.
    What do you suggest? The softener is 15 months old I spent well over $4k trying to fix my water, I’ve tried the 5 in 1 Windsor salt with rust care and gone through 8 full bags in the last 2 months. And I’m at a loss on what to do! It makes you want to gag even just showering or using cold water. We can no longer drink it because it’s now just completely disgusting.
    Keep in mind my water straight from my well looks like iced tea when I filled my pool with it on bypass.
    Any insight to what I can do?
    - David

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  9 месяцев назад

      A water soiftener will only remove up to 1.0 ppm of iron. Anything more than that you need a dedicated iron and sulphur filter like this. I don't like the system you have and I don't believe their claims. It sdound slike you need one of these waterestore.com/products/hum-chemical-free-iron-sulphur-manganese-filter-fok-1-0-cube Cranking up your hardness settings is just an act of desperation and will not solve your concern, but as you've found it will waste a great deal of salt.

  • @imhcv
    @imhcv 9 месяцев назад +1

    Does water filtration reduce TDS level?

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  9 месяцев назад

      Reverse Osmosis systems like this will waterestore.com/products/hum-water-saver-reverse-osmosis-system-75-gallons-per-day Just about everything else including sediment, tannin, iton and water softeners will not.

  • @relaxationsleep3478
    @relaxationsleep3478 5 месяцев назад

    there seem to be loads of erroers in your analysys there ; lead/lithium/maganese as just a few that seem to be at higher levels after filtration than before filtration ??

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  5 месяцев назад

      I asked the lab to confirm and they said the results are within their specs and confirm that they are correct.

    • @relaxationsleep3478
      @relaxationsleep3478 5 месяцев назад

      ​@@GarytheWaterGuy so higher levels after filtering ? on more than one element .. that seems like not a very accurate analysys
      but the ideea that that 500$ RO system filters more than a Brita is logical for sure

    • @mike103192
      @mike103192 3 месяца назад

      I have water tested at labs frequently for my job and it is not uncommon to see these types of oddities in the results, particularly when concentrations are very low.

  • @Mnil52
    @Mnil52 2 месяца назад

    It would be hilarious if he made up all those numbers

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  2 месяца назад

      No, it would be deceiptful, that's not how I roll.

  • @mytapscore
    @mytapscore 7 месяцев назад +2

    Great video Gary! Thanks for testing with us!
    Super interesting to see the results! I imagine it's the ion exchange (cation) resin in the Brita filter that resulted in a drop in hardness. Ion exchange (cation) resins has been shown to reduce both magnesium and calcium, the two main contributors to water hardness. (I know Gary knows this, but figured I should add it for those who read the comments.)
    The drop in uranium is the most surprising to me. Didn't know Brita could do that.
    As expected, Reverse Osmosis cleans house with so many contaminants. This aligns with the tests we see where RO systems are involved.
    Personally I was most surprised at the annual cost of a RO filter. I thought it would've been higher.
    Thanks for doing these videos and helping us learn too!
    What's next?! 🙂

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  7 месяцев назад

      Thank you for your support, as always. This is the Reverse Osmosis system we recommend waterestore.com/products/hum-water-saver-75-gpd-reverse-osmosis-system-brushed-nickel-faucet

  • @aafedtfamily
    @aafedtfamily 5 месяцев назад

    Water guy ... but not a math guy ... "removed SOME of the Copper" .... I guess if "some" is 87% then yes it removed some. Similar statements elsewhere ...

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  5 месяцев назад

      Thanks for your feedback. I will work on my math skills, but the point of the video is the same, the Reversde Osmosis system removes far more of the contaminants than the Brita.

  • @Andrew-xw4zj
    @Andrew-xw4zj 3 месяца назад

    I think the new Brita plus or pro filters remove more contaminants. Won't remove as much as an RO system obviously but considering the cost and ease of use may be a good option for most ppl.

  • @earthtwobella1
    @earthtwobella1 5 месяцев назад

    What if you can not afford that right now. What filtered pitcher is the best.

    • @GarytheWaterGuy
      @GarytheWaterGuy  5 месяцев назад +1

      I ahve not tested them all, but this pitcher is better than nothing.