The Unholy Trinity (Rival Gods) // Ty Gibson

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 окт 2019
  • There are three primary means by which human beings are dehumanized: power, money and sex. These are the three great idols of our world. In the kingdom of God, power, money and sex are subordinate to love.

Комментарии • 21

  • @Stealthzero
    @Stealthzero 4 года назад +4

    Love it, praise the Lord and keep up the excellent work!

  • @mariodelarosa5722
    @mariodelarosa5722 10 месяцев назад +1

    This lecture was nothing but man's philosophy!

  • @patriciakomichi3371
    @patriciakomichi3371 2 года назад

    May God bless your ministry.Ps Ty Gibson.Iam so uplifed by your sermons.

  • @ronaldgibson6375
    @ronaldgibson6375 3 года назад +1

    I'm being Assulted by Mr Jerry Willis an folks from this church

  • @banapuru
    @banapuru 4 месяца назад

    How does Ty explain this quote, coming from the Lord Jesus, Son of the Father...
    “And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.”
    - John 17:3
    And the apostle Paul, speaking to the Corinthians...
    “But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.”
    - 1 Corinthians 8:6 (KJV)

  • @MSB780
    @MSB780 3 года назад

    Isaiah 40:7-8; 1 Peter 1:24-25;
    Psalm 103:13-16.

  • @mariodelarosa5722
    @mariodelarosa5722 10 месяцев назад +2

    I thought Yahshua said that if you love Yah, you will keep HIS commandments?!?!? You never once mentioned this verse, but instead you said that if the love of God is in your heart, it is revealed by the way you treat people. Well, even bad or evil people, or even non-christian people treat other people with kindness sometimes, and that does not mean the love of God is in them. Obedience to Yah's Law in the love of Yashua is the fruit of your love for HIM.

  • @ElCineHefe
    @ElCineHefe 3 года назад

    God asks in Isaiah, Who can He be compared to?
    According to the heathen, all of their triune gods.

  • @MSB780
    @MSB780 3 года назад

    Isaiah chapter 2

  • @MSB780
    @MSB780 3 года назад +4

    Father, Son, and Spirit are called “The Godhead” “For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.” Colossians 2:9, not the trinity. Trinity comes from the Catholic Church. As Satan twists everything, he has also twisted the Biblical subject of the Godhead. My people perish from lack of knowledge. Hosea 4:6

  • @DonjohnsonBG
    @DonjohnsonBG Год назад

    At 17:50 How in the world you can say 1 Cor 8:5 there not really many gods and lords there’s only one true God Father Son and Spirit when the very next verse 1 Cor 8:6 that you! didn’t read clearly says the Father is the One God.

  • @JTautuku
    @JTautuku 4 года назад +3

    I don’t understand where the trinity doctrine is found in the Bible? I know the RCC introduced it but never seen it in scripture. “yet for us there is one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and through whom we live” 1 Cor 8:6.
    One God: The Father, The Creator.
    One Lord: The Son, The Inheritor of creation.
    One Spirit: The character of God.
    Even Lord Jesus knew He wasn’t God as He even told us only the Father knows when He (Lord Jesus) will return. If Lord Jesus was God then He would now when He will return.
    That’s just where my thinking is at with the “trinity”. Anyone willing to have open dialogue about this (not doctrine bashing lol)?

    • @Dad4_Service
      @Dad4_Service 4 года назад +1

      The following verse is the only thing I can think of regarding the Trinity. Note that there is only one name for all 3 of the persons. It's "in the name" only once, not in the name of the Father and in the name of the Son and in the name of the Holy Ghost. That said I wouldn't take only one verse and say that's the proof. We (you and I) both need more people to chime in on this subject.
      Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Matthew 28:19

    • @Dad4_Service
      @Dad4_Service 4 года назад +2

      I just thought of another instance that might be better at showing God in multiple persons. Note that we see God saying "Let US ... in OUR image, after OUR likeness..." Genesis 1:26
      And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth

    • @receiveyashuahamesciac8025
      @receiveyashuahamesciac8025 3 года назад

      God is ONE. Just as you are one who has many different relational roles. You are one yet you are a son, brother, uncle, employee, dad, and any other relational positions you're qualified for such as a nurse, doctor, teacher, electrician, lawyer,etc. So the Most High is ONE God who chose to relate with us through the Son, and Holy Spirit-- His Spirit. The Son is God's relational role to show us how to be obedient, a servant, and holy. God played the role of the Son who indeed was God incarnate in the flesh who sinned not neither was guile found in his mouth. Their is no trinity. The RCC which is ran by satan himself put this false doctrine out to cause confusion and doubt.

    • @shellidietrich4730
      @shellidietrich4730 2 года назад

      Genesis 1:26 and God said let us make man in our image after our likeness and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the foul of the air and over the cattle and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth.
      Us is God the father the Son Jesus and the Holy Ghost. Our image and after our likeness and let them have dominion over the fish etc. more than one . KJV is the received text or original text. Keep searching the scriptures you’ll find more evidence there! may you be blessed.

    • @user-fd1lj4pn4g
      @user-fd1lj4pn4g 5 месяцев назад

      @@Dad4_Service Genesis 1:26 is among the top 10 most misunderstood supposedly Trinitarian verses of the Bible. Knowing Hebrew should eliminate the misunderstanding almost entirely, but even just reading the KJV should be enough to know the truth if people would but look at the next verse, verse 27.
      "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." (Genesis 1:27)
      A clearly singular God created man in _his_ image; "he" created them.
      But if one knows Hebrew, it gets more interesting. The word "elohim," translated as "God" in these verses, has other possible translations. In Psalm 82:6 it applies to people ("gods" in the KJV), and Jesus quotes that verse in John 10:34. In Psalm 8:5, the word "elohim" is translated in the KJV as "angels," and this verse is quoted in Hebrews 2:7 as "anggelos" in the Greek, lest one should think this were a mistranslation, so inspired writings show that the "angels" translation of "elohim" is _accurate._
      Here in Genesis 1:26, the word "elohim" may apply to God and to another being(s), such as to the angels, _or even to people._ We find Mrs. White applying it to God and His Son. But the verb tells us even more! Verse 26 uses "asah" for "create", a word that can be used for people or others as well; whereas verse 27 uses "bara," a word only used for God's creations, never for anyone else. Genesis 1:1 uses "bara," and every place that "bara" is used it is in _singular_ form. This tells us that even though the noun appears plural, it is actually singular.
      Hebrew has many nouns which are irregular, and the verbs or adjectives for them must be consulted to know whether they are plural or singular, masculine or feminine (grammatical gender). For example, the following words are _always_ plural in Hebrew in form, like "scissors" in English, and have no way to write them as singular--but they can still be used singularly with singular verbs or adjectives: faces, waters, heavens/skies, entrails, lives, blindness, etc.
      While there are other competing theories, such as that of "plural of majesty" and that "elohim" was a loanword from Aramaic where it was only used as a plural because the speakers were polytheistic, I have come to understand that "elohim" is one of these _plurale tantum_ which is always plural in form. "El" is not the singular of "elohim" as many suppose: it has its own plural form, "elim."