Why We’re MUCH More Related Than We Think | Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson and Ken Ham
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- Humans are much more related than most people think. In The New History of the Human Race! (Part 4) with Ken Ham and Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, we discuss not only this, but also how to silently take over a country.
AnswersinGenes... - Help us continue to share the gospel.
I REALLY EENJOY AND AM SO THANKFUL FOR Ken HAM, I LOVE YOU LORD, WITH ALL MY HEART AND SOUL!!!!
Me too!
We are way closer related than most people think 👍🏾
Amen!
Great stuff. So amazing to consider that the Bible is literally true!
We are one ☝🏽
Echad!
Awesome! Love this!
It was largely black African, black African Muslim slave traders selling other tribes to everyone else.
It was the way of the world for thousands of years.
The Slavs were subjected to slavery by many and it is where the English word for "slave" is derived from.
The Ottoman empire had European slaves.
The Irish were subject to slavery of sorts even in the early United States.
Various "Native" American tribes had slaves among themselves and among other peoples.
Thank you!!!!!!
Let me say this again. As a believer in Jesus Christ in the Scriptures, I love your website and all of the great, hard scientific information you have available. The information contained in the book “traced“ needs to get out but to my mind it is buried in “scientific-eze“ that makes it hard for the layman to get to the main point, which is of course the truth of scripture. Science is never going to be convinced no matter how much forensic data is brought to their attention, and I think your energy would be better spent in short summaries to the believers. You can still have deep long discussions on the science, but I fear this information is going over the heads of millions. Great stuff!
The book may be too advanced but this particular serious of videos is broken down in a rather simple way, imo.
He is ALL OVER THE PLACE IN HIS EXPLAINATIONS.
This is still going on today. Great information to think about. All GODS children.
All are God's creation; only those that know Jesus as their savior are his children according to the Bible. See especially John and First John.
Amazing information! Thank you! How do the different races all come from Noah? How did Babalon influence new races and languages? What people groups were wiped out be wars?
the neaderthals were wiped out, maybe by intermarriage instead of war?
So far what you've discussed is pretty spot on for what I've believed for years.
Although I might have to reevaluate the avg skin tone which I've always thought that eventually my descendants would have a slightly darker skin tone than I do.
I know this is a little far from the part where you had a photo of the middle eastern guide and the tourist.
The woman on the left I believe is the tourist. Why she has the more anglicized facial features plus the sunglasses on the head. The woman on the right I believe to be the guide because she has more Mediterranean facial features.
Your wife also has more Mediterranean features plus the curly hair.
What a gifted man !
The one thing you missed was that the male victims of the Islamic slave trade were nearly all if not universally castrated.
You don’t need males to procreate a generation females gibe birth not males
Ive done Ancestry. I have discovered that there is scottish, British, even Spanish in my DNA. This helps in cases of ADOPTION. Children of adopted indivudals or thee adopted.
This is what is happening to the US right now
Well this was somewhat confusing.... but his argument seems to hinge on the idea of dark skinned people marrying light skinnned people because they were the majorty. My observation is that people seem more likely to marry within their own kin groups.
I think that he was just using this as an example. It's still highly interesting though. We (humans) are all brothers and sisters in the eyes of GOD. GOD bless!!
proximity matters more than "kin groups".
Your under the assumption that these are from-just marriages, Most slave owners were not above impregnating female slaves,because they were considered property, you should never assume that birth comes just from marriage especially in the slave trade eras of time which is from the beginning of man kind, people suck, bad people suck at everything thing that happens in life, No one gets out undamaged, your thoughts on life are very naive !
You have to get Y chromosomes genetic testing to get even close to actual genetic evidence anyway and there is only 1 company that does Y chromosome testing !
Mid-Atlantic slave trade is not real event. Who brought 12 mil slaves to the America's and if so who did they work for? Also if you will remember their where all types of wars between colonial powers during that time so who had time, energy man power, and money to have this robust slave trade and fight all wars on different fronts. I believe like that them fallacy of different races is wrong, but to perpetuate any body of Swarty complexion has to originate from Africa is wrong all the way around. Also "African Decent" is not the the same as "African Ancestry"... P.S. DNA test are for entertainment purposes only...read small print
I have also been genetically linked with my fathers birth mothers family.
Dr. Jeanson might want to reassess his impressions of whether recent integrity on science surrounding drug therapy effectiveness has much integrity. One popular anti-patasite drug was recently revealed to have a 94% rate of being effective at preventing death.
He would do well to keep to his lane, here, respectfully.
TIME STAMPS & PERSONAL NOTES
0:00 Broad Intro & Rambling
?:?? Review Of Previous Episodes
?:?? Main Topic Introduction
4:20 Start Of Main Content: "How To Silently Take Over A Country"
5:04 Atlantic Slave Trade; about 11m people
? Male-Female Ratio of 2-1 around 1500s-1860s AD; mostly outside of US & UK
07:29 year by year data shown by graph; trickles in until 1700, rises quickly, and then peaks at 1800, and then dies off
8:54 Muslim Slave Trade; about 11.5m people
? male-female ratio of 1-2
9:44 600s-1800s AD
12:00 hypothetical example of the impact of the Muslim slave trade, using hypothetical amount of 60,000 slaves in a region of 60,000,000 white European
21:39 Q&A: Can DNA tests tell us about us having African ancestry?
25:18 Q&A: Commercial tests aren't accurate?
27:39 Review & Debriefing
africa showed up in my dna, but that wasnt a surprise cuz i know my history via my mother's line. what was surprising is that i have dna from the iberian peninsula (spain, portugal, france), one of those former ussr -stans and moldavia. and farther back from india and if you go far enough back, korea.
I've been listening to each episode looking for some kind of bombshell. All I have really heard is "what if's" and "consider the possibility of," etc etc. It is very reminiscent of how evolution supporters share their information, therefore, unless there is some good information coming in the next episodes, it does more to damage the message than to support it, in my humble opinion. The lessons on genetics are reasonable, but ... I am not getting any new info.
When it was predominantly women nobody Changed anything. When it became mostly men then people started saying stop.
The premise began on “enslaved” “blacks”, who would not be moving about freely in society. It doesn’t change the “possibility” presentable in probabilities, but the AVAILABILITY of a “black” (likely female) is dramatically reduced, so the impacts are much more minimized, in my assessment. Looking at the mixture of peoples in the U.S., two observations historically can present similar obstructions. First, at the outset, much of our population originated from a small (area wise) source location, by ship, from England/Ireland/Scotland and west coastal Europe. In many areas, as settlement advanced, our ancestry tended to collect themselves with peoples from the same original source area. History taught them to collect to help maintain protection and, likely, to try to perpetuate a life that would most closely copy the world/customs they left behind. Perpetuating language comes to mind. Similarly, and most prominently with English ancestry, the source populations had already tended to push a centralized ancestry pool because of limited mobility of that population. I would suspect much of the early U.S. population was closely related.
What he's talking about has currently been going on in the world in European countries, America, Australia, and Canada, who's doing it and why are they doing. If I say who's doing it I'll be accused of being racist
Yeah, I agree. Honestly, he is racist, and probably supports the migration into our countries.
🌺🌺🌺
Can you detect what Jewish tribe a person might have come from? We would all be from one of the original tribes, right? It would be interesting to see if we belonged to more than one tribe.
Judah - are the Jews - the 10 lost tribes of Israel were not Jews but Israelites. Most Jews today are converts and have no genetic connection to Judah - Middle Eastern DNA. But are Khazars from Caucus Regions.
@@NannyMAU Yes, Hebrew, Israelites, and Jews - I was using the term "Jewish" here as a generic term. Since the Temple was in Judah and they are the only remaining of the tribes. However, the question is in the context of this presentation of DNA - not whether or not they are converts. In the presentation, everyone is genetically connected to everyone. ;)
@@_thomase they aren't the only remaining tribe according to the scriptures
@@Dreadboi1990 I'm not a Biblical scholar, but to my knowledge of Scripture, the ten northern tribes were taken away and did not return. Only Judah and Benjamin returned and rebuilt the Temple. What Scripture are you referring to?
We all go back Noah, but not all of us can be traced back to the 12 tribes of Israel.
Why would we believe you anymore than anybody else.
I dont agree with most of what you say. Answers are in Genesis. There was one color of people then the earth divided each group of people i think had the same genes and people started to change over time.
TheBible also says that a bastard, Hebrew mixing with six day creation, would not be allowed back into the temple of God for ten generations so that is your answer. They would not be considered pure by God until the tenth generation. It is important to know your Bible.
Strictly in the context of the nation of Israel which was intended to be an insular tribe which would take NO wives outside of it's nation and people and live strictly by god's law to demonstrate life under his law to the nations. This was to prevent the cultures of neighboring countries to be adopted into Israel, which did end up occurring anyways as they broke the lord's covenant.
We are no longer under that covenant.
I have a serious objection to your numbers in this presentation.
It appears that you make the assumption that if a person has any African parentage, then they belong to the 68% African-Descent, leaving those without any African parentage at 32%. But the huge majority of people with African parentage would still have a much higher level of Caucasian parentage. Your analysis does not account for this... Hence the African appearance disappears over time.
They wouldn't be of African decent. They would have an African ancestor but their ancestors would still be predominantly Caucasian.
the whole point of the video is that there really is no such thing as African.
@ Cat People he doesnt believe in the THEORY of evolution. he believes in creation.
I'm wondering how diversity existed at the time of babel.
Interesting once you got past the odd wokeness
He may be rewriting human history, but when it comes to CONVEYING that info to the average human, he needs help.
Cheddar man dark skin stringy hair European look it up.
They have nothing to know his skin pigment, they took more than a little artistic license there.
@@kriegjaeger just like he is taking more than a little license with his "probabilities" and "assuming" and "presumably" ... Basically all I hear is theory, we already have plenty of those
I hope not