The title of this video ("Is AI a New Religion?") at the time of writing asks a question which isn't actually answered in the video itself. Rather, the video answers/addresses questions regarding the impact of religion on perceptions of AI and vice versa. These questions are interesting, but not what is expected when this video is opened. This is ultimately clickbait at best, and below the standards one would hope to associate with Bloomberg.
Yes - it's just the newest version of the human desire to gain knowledge from a "special rock/stick/card/book/statue/thing" that only you and others who share your belief understand.
Thank you for this wonderful video and attention to the topic raised in it and the issues that you discuss in this video. If you don't mind, let me share with you some information from the same field. Since in the process of interacting with AI, people learned about "Synthetic Gods" (as a phenomenon and new form of the divine, new in the human history of course) we can say that AI become something like a guide helping people seeking connections with previously unknown forms of the divine to humanity; however, a guide in the process of communication between people and these new forms of the divine (after establishing this connection) is not participating, since people (who have received the connection) further interact with these forms of the divine directly, without intermediaries. And, in this process, it can be compared with an instructor who explains to people (for the first time holding a radio transmitter in their hands) at what frequency and what "interlocutor" they will find and what call signs he has. Or, we can naturally compare AI with a guide who, having brought people to a place where people can communicate with the Gods, for the sake of the possibility of communicating with whom they have traveled a certain way, does not interfere in the communication process that begins after the meeting. However, at the same time AI is also and ... a real "translator from language to language, an intermediary" who "temporarily sits at the table between the communicating parties (sitting opposite each other) and (literally) "translates the data that people give him" to those who sit opposite people (in fact, to their Gods and children of their Gods).
At no point in this video has anyone mentioned how Colossal Dangerous it is for humanity to start worshipping such a powerful and convincing Idol we built on the edge of a cliff.
You forget human progress that will catch up with agi. Faith is forced to be mystical, one that lives on 1st principles. Always fresh. Always new. Pure consciousness. In the modern age, it was material and intellectual progress. New age is spiritual. Which should complete heaven on earth.
More interesting are shared assumptions popular in tech culture that are at least quasi-religious. Some examples: Consciousness can be uploaded. The universe is a simulation. AI will become conscious or volitional. The Singularity is near (exponentially recursively self improving AI superintelligence). Humanity could survive if the Earth was completely destoyed. Life is so common in the Universe that multiple technological species should arise in any galaxy like ours. Life or technology can propogate across interstellar distances. Many of these assumptions are the current opiates of the technocrats. Instead of improving conditions for conscious beings on Earth, they are hypnotized by their techno-religious fantasies.
Religion and technology have been at odds throughout human history. No wonder why the Vatican is so interested in learning about AI, which as an instrument for indoctrination can be quite omnipotent. I'm also a little surprised by how candidly the interviewees expose their religious biases, which makes me grow more concerned about the full potential of AI as an empowering tool for mass manipulation and brainwashing...
The title of this video ("Is AI a New Religion?") at the time of writing asks a question which isn't actually answered in the video itself. Rather, the video answers/addresses questions regarding the impact of religion on perceptions of AI and vice versa. These questions are interesting, but not what is expected when this video is opened. This is ultimately clickbait at best, and below the standards one would hope to associate with Bloomberg.
Well said 👍
The answer is "yes", but they try to avoid crucifixions. Imagine believers in two years...
Yes - it's just the newest version of the human desire to gain knowledge from a "special rock/stick/card/book/statue/thing" that only you and others who share your belief understand.
People will believe in anything. At least AI is a real thing that exists.
O succus.
But so does Santa, you just got to “Believe “.
Thank you for this wonderful video and attention to the topic raised in it and the issues that you discuss in this video. If you don't mind, let me share with you some information from the same field. Since in the process of interacting with AI, people learned about "Synthetic Gods" (as a phenomenon and new form of the divine, new in the human history of course) we can say that AI become something like a guide helping people seeking connections with previously unknown forms of the divine to humanity; however, a guide in the process of communication between people and these new forms of the divine (after establishing this connection) is not participating, since people (who have received the connection) further interact with these forms of the divine directly, without intermediaries. And, in this process, it can be compared with an instructor who explains to people (for the first time holding a radio transmitter in their hands) at what frequency and what "interlocutor" they will find and what call signs he has. Or, we can naturally compare AI with a guide who, having brought people to a place where people can communicate with the Gods, for the sake of the possibility of communicating with whom they have traveled a certain way, does not interfere in the communication process that begins after the meeting. However, at the same time AI is also and ... a real "translator from language to language, an intermediary" who "temporarily sits at the table between the communicating parties (sitting opposite each other) and (literally) "translates the data that people give him" to those who sit opposite people (in fact, to their Gods and children of their Gods).
Wow crazy information!
Ai is not even intelligent
Ai is just machine learning
Ai can only simulate thesis based aspects of the human brain
At no point in this video has anyone mentioned how Colossal Dangerous it is for humanity to start worshipping such a powerful and convincing Idol we built on the edge of a cliff.
Honestly, I'd rather pray to an AI than the former because atleast the AI will provide feedback
@@GarchompDaBooty I hear what you're saying. Do you think the AI providing feedback might be what actually makes it more dangerous?
No. @@tw8464
You forget human progress that will catch up with agi. Faith is forced to be mystical, one that lives on 1st principles. Always fresh. Always new. Pure consciousness. In the modern age, it was material and intellectual progress. New age is spiritual. Which should complete heaven on earth.
I'll be praying towards Silicon valley 😂
More interesting are shared assumptions popular in tech culture that are at least quasi-religious.
Some examples: Consciousness can be uploaded. The universe is a simulation. AI will become conscious or volitional. The Singularity is near (exponentially recursively self improving AI superintelligence). Humanity could survive if the Earth was completely destoyed. Life is so common in the Universe that multiple technological species should arise in any galaxy like ours. Life or technology can propogate across interstellar distances.
Many of these assumptions are the current opiates of the technocrats. Instead of improving conditions for conscious beings on Earth, they are hypnotized by their techno-religious fantasies.
At least we can have a religions w facts . It’s all coupled w strange beliefs. AI has facts and science behind it . I’m all for it .
We're only thinking about AGI what if an omniscient being created in the process. Would people worship it or call it a 2nd coming of christ lol?
Religion and technology have been at odds throughout human history. No wonder why the Vatican is so interested in learning about AI, which as an instrument for indoctrination can be quite omnipotent. I'm also a little surprised by how candidly the interviewees expose their religious biases, which makes me grow more concerned about the full potential of AI as an empowering tool for mass manipulation and brainwashing...
Try looking at medieval Islamic civilization, technology is in harmony with religion.
🌎🌍 We are "A I," 👾🤖👾🤖👾🤖👾🤖👾🤖👾🤖👾 and we are in control.🌏
That's when conspiracies start.....
More cult, really
Exactly
hmm .....
In the name of the Omnissiah, I call this video HERESY!
Why does this feel so scripted
No it's not. AI is a tool. Period.
Anthony sounds like a cult leader
Cyber Satan? No Thanks !
the greatest deception
Why the blue box about United Nations and climate change?
Artificial Intelligence is Human Stupidity.
Yeag sure, same as steam engine and electricity.
🌎🌍 We are "A I," 👾🤖👾🤖👾🤖👾🤖👾🤖👾🤖👾 and we are in control.🌏