Man this video was excellent. So concise, quick, to the point and with great examples and going beyond the basic information and giving the actual nuanced discussion. Good rhythm too. Hell yeah.
When I was in Vietnam in 68/69 I carried two Nikon f. One had a 35mm and the other had the 28mm. Worked for me. The other photographers in the unit thought I was crazy. But I had many of my photos get into the weekly marine newsletter. PS I was crazy.
This is one of the best videos on this subject I have ever seen. Thank you. I love 35 for street but have been wanting more, so considering 28. Your comments on the amount of people in your city plays an impact on your focal length choice was one I hadn't considered...
I come from shooting landscapes and use a telephoto a lot for that but I found the 28 works so well for the street. With a 50 I found it was difficult to create layers and depth, the 35 felt a bit boring sometimes but the 28 just felt right and gives you a sense of being right there. The chaos can sometimes be a bit hard to control though, sometimes that's a good thing, sometime it's not.
What a well-written, tightly-reasoned and well-stated piece! In addition to being a longtime serious photographer, I write professionally for broadcast. So I know how hard it is to write about anything, let alone another mode of expression. It's like dancing about poetry. You pull it off, when so many others don't. Thanks!
Just me, but I skipped the 28mm after decades of using 35mm as my "standard" street lens. I instead went to 24mm. This rewards me with a true different look for the effort of changing glass. One cool trick with the 35mm/24mm combo... the 24mm being held vertically (portrait mode) has the same edge to edge coverage as the 35mm held horizontally (landscape mode) at a constant distance. This give you the ability to emphasize height or width for the subject depending on the environment. This is of course personal. A new shooter should do a 100% immersion with a single lens and really get to know it before cluttering their brain with choices.
that’s interesting! many (myself included) as super challenging. i agree though, figuring out the characteristics of one lens, initially, gives you an idea of how to notice the uniqueness of others.
Yeah but if you were to shoot from the same spot with both, you'd have lower the f-stop on the 28mm to achieve the same depth of field when cropped in to match the 35mm.
If I travel with friends or family, it's 35. Travel alone, 28. In the good old film days, 35 was the standard lens for point-and -shoot cameras because of its versatility. Now we can crop so 28 potentially offers even more but then the subject had better be in the center. They are both good primes to have, both can be put into good use. Don't get a kit zoom though, the aperture is usually too small. You might as well use your iphone
Our preferences are reversed. If traveling with family, I am physically close to them so getting a good shot with 28mm is easy. 35mm works better for photographing strangers. I actually travel with both lenses. One in pocket and one in camera. Micro four thirds system. Pancake lens not much bigger than a roll of film.
I almost spent thousands to buy the xf 85 mm for night photography but when I discovered the works of garry winogrand and daido moriyama, i was blown away with the many details that a 28 mm can capture. i started using the 28 mm and man the results I got are something I would never imagine myself taking ever in my life.
@@doriyancoleman for sure! i love photography and it's a whole world itself. I still have lots of it to explore and I'll keep exploring. I appreciate what you do on youtube, sharing your perspective on these technical stuff. keep them videos coming :))
I still find it a bit strange how many people are saying 35mm is boring. Most smartphone main cameras are between 24-28mm. That's all we see most of the time. 35mm isn't common, thus isn't boring, in my opinion.
Henri Cartier-Bresson did a pretty good job with his 50mm lens, ya know. 😉. Seriously, all focal lengths work. I shot at 28mm today, and it was fine. I have many shots taken at 50mm and 60mm, on up to 90mm, and all went well. Of course the tighter the street, the more 50mm or less seems best. But there are times when shooting across the way works out well, or is simply a necessity, at which time that 28mm will need a huge crop-down. And I get it that when you are but three to six feet of subject, you can really use that wide lens. Of all the lens choices the most forgiving, framing wise, and for lack of distortions is the 50mm. At this time however, I am moving to the 35mm and 28mm field of view to see how much more story I get, that up close and personal feel, as you described, and even how unrelated works within a photo. Yes, in a real world there is a focus you are viewing, along with other unrelated, yet possibly offering a balance or an offset to the story going on -- heck, maybe three unrelated things happening??? It all works, portrait and wide urban landscapes. The current trend of ultra sharp, stand-out shots of people, with a blurred out background, might not hold up over time. When first viewed, as in something new and with a certain shock appeal, it first seems cool -- very cool! Then you realize it is a super sharp image of nothing, with no story at all. Just a portrait. Anyway, that 28mm or even 35mm when close can distort human faces, or when the camera is a tilt, the whole world, buildings and all wiggle and waggle, thus it is a little more the challenge when having to quick-draw shoot. Might be why Henri liked the 50mm, or the framing thing? It is a good challenge -- I am going for it. 28 and 35mm this month! To get to my site on the web, search my full name, Loren.
Great video! One of the critiques of 28mm is closeness to your subject, something we're afraid of, but on the flip side, I find myself "exposed" more by people on the street who notice me taking a photo of them when I'm actually farther away from them rather than closer. Think about it, no one would think you can take a sharp photo of someone that close, or there is anything worth taking a photo of that close (admittedly I'm never under anyone's chin close)...
Love how concise this was! Kudos. How I think about it for everyday photography: if I’m shooting the people I’m sitting & talking with and don’t want to step away, 28mm is the way to go. If I’m shooting stuff that catches my eye, or interactions happening outside my personal space, I pick the 35mm.
Good video; matches my experience. I shoot Sony and often carry their 28/2 in addition to a mounted 35. That lens is small, light , and cheap so easy to own and tuck in a pocket. Nice to have when things feel tight.
fully agree. 50mm was/is considered the 'to go portrait lens'... always comes with the finest bokeh and people love it like a soy sauce. have a boring image - but shot at 1.4 - they love it. i think that's the reason the starting wanna be street photographer grab 50mm (don't want to insult anybody). i love the sentence 'the longer you do street photography, the wider you go'. street photography is about it... life on street. it's tough to show a photo where you don't show the life. the interaction of the street elements. that beautiful shot by andre wagner of the kid dribbling the basketball. where would you have to stand to shoot it with 50mm. i think the more i see the photographer be close to their subjects on the street and you say 'one feels immersed in the picture'. i think that is the sole reason for that feeling. the guy was THERE in the moment. He is right next to the kids. that is why everybody can feel the 'immersion' . so the only way to be able to do that - lens must go wide(r). great video, doriyan, gotta follow you :)
many great points all throughout your comment! it’s funny, because I’ve truly gotten to a point where 40mm is about the longest i like to go. what you said about immersion and truly being present in the moment has a lot of legitimacy to it. street photography is a beautiful thing! i appreciate you sharing and following 🙏
I own the Pancake lenses..... I currently have a Canon 40mm 2.8 STM that I use on my 1DX MK III and my Canon 5DSR .... just added a RF 28mm 2.8 STM to my Eos R (this combo belongs together) ..... I also own the Canon 50mm EF 1.4 USM that I use on my Canon 5DSR for large 50 mp portraits ...... It's nice having a couple of prime lenses.... never tried a 35mm, and thanks for your perspective !!!!
I was tired of losing teeth so I switched back to 35mm😭 all kidding aside, I always enjoy your thoughts on the cerebral aspects when it comes to focal length and what they represent. Those thoughts combined with memes and cartoon inserts just hit right, man. Enjoyed this one!
Oh HELL YEAH, I'm now a subscriber to this channel! Smart arguments, brilliant advice, transparent, and genuine. You helped me decide on which focal length I need to use for when and where. But I will follow your advice going between 28mm, which will capture more "thick action" shots, and 35mm, which will get more specific. But to your point, both win depending on what story you tell and shooting style. Doriyan, you are truly talented! Thank you for sharing your thoughts and making this video, cheers.
Nice job regarding the differences in using the 28mm vs 35mm. My belief is that the wider the lens angle of view, the more skill is required of the photographer to make a compelling image. Best wishes in your photographic endeavours.😊
Good day Doriyan, I was just going through this with my own system, I was using a 28m full frame lens on crop sensor and now went full frame. I thought I wouldn't like 28mm FOV at all but turn out I do not mind it at all. Again its all personal taste, but we all shouldn't be afraid to try something new we may like.
man when I tell you that I was initially the exact same way when it came to 28mm. seemed too wide, too intimidating, but it’s so much fun to use! like you said, we should at least try things before we come to a conclusion! happy shooting 💪🏾
I really enjoyed that video! You have many interesting descriptions that kept my attention and gave me a chuckle. Good discussion of the various aspects. I like 28 and 50 and don't have a 35 because I feel it to be a blah middle. While I don't shoot "street", I do like architecture as you presented it. So the images met my expectations from the title. Careful to not go too wide - you could end up with Detroit in the frame!
Sam Abell is a master of 28mm documentary style photography. I think he’s compositionally one of the strongest photographers of the street/documentary genre. Well worth looking at his work. Primarily used a 28 and 90.
Standard lens you own is 50mm then next is 35mm , not wide enough just a bit wider so 28mm is the best general for most occasions . I recommend 4 lens that I personal pick , 50mm , 28mm , 21mm and 90mm . If you have these 4 will cover all you need . I shoot range finder manual cameras .
I like the 35 & 50mm. I do like the 28 mm focal length! However the one that I own does not always performed as I would like. (barrel distortion.) Yes of course I know how to remedy this problem. Priorities have to come first. Awesome video.
I just started shooting street photography… I’ve got 135, 85, 58, 50, 35 and 28mm lenses. So far my favorite are 50mm and 85mm. Easier to compose and I’m still feeling uncomfortable coming close to people… but I’m still trying to use the 35mm lens.
Nice video. // I have a Canon 28mm ultrasonic f/1.8. Beautiful lens.... It's wide, but not exaggerating wide. It has great image IQ. // Maybe 24mm would be better... but I'm not going to get another wide angle lens just for an additional 4mm. - The wider fish-eye lenses look intriguing... but they are slow. Even f/2.8 seems dubious.
The advice to buy a mouth guard if you're going try street photography with a 28mm lens made me smile. I like the perspective of how the choice of focal length changes the demands on the photographer. As a beginner, I never thought of it that way.
Thanks for all the tips, I have been shooting with a 40 mm on my M cameras, and it's worked out really well for me but I feel like the next lens should be a 28 for those environmental and architectural street work.
daamn this video is excellent, this finally made me realise why I dislike 24mm. I'm just not good enough for that much information in my frame yet, also our little streets are empty, it does not work properly with that angle
I just found your 35 vs 50 video and then this one and loved them both. Really great stuff. I’m glad I found your channel as so many of your other video topics interest me. Thanks man.
i’d consider it! i’ve used 40mm a lot throughout the years, and enjoy the perspective. i do like the freedom of interchangeable lenses tho, that’s the tough part
Nice concise video. I've mostly been shooting 35mm, but I'm definitely feeling like a little bit more context could be good sometimes. No doubt I'd run into the same problem that you mentioned, where the subject is lost in the frame. I'm also starting to play around with 40mm. 50mm is far too tight for me.
thanks! yeah while 28mm doesn’t “feel” like a far number from 35, you really get a different experience from it. i also feel you with 50mm, it’s just not for me 😅
Amazing video. So many talking heads just talk about the look, composition, etc. You gave me more. I can totally relate to the challenges of getting your face in there with a 28mm. Sometimes that intimacy creates a moment you don't get with a longer prime, but regardless your video moved and inspired me. Just subscribed and can't wait to go through your content!
I started with a 50 but most of the streets where I live are quite narrow so the 50 always felt a bit cramped. I moved to the 28 recently and I like the additional room but it's still a bit intimidating to get close sometimes. Luckily with zone focusing being much easier on the 28 I can get in and out fast.
With the right Fuji camera and using sports finder I can put on an 18mm pancake and then have 27 and 35 on the one camera without the need to carry another lens. Or 23mm gives me 35 and 44. Yeah there is less megapixels but man it’s a good option.
I did a little bit of street photography at first with my EOS RP and 50 1.8. Nice, little combo. But its true, 50mm is "tight", and since i have "downgraded" to APS-C i either have to rely on my 17-55 2.8 lens or in the case of cities i also use the 10-20mm 3.5 lens for architecture and so. But on APS-C a classic 50mm is also interesting for 75-80mm for street and portrait! In which i really like my actual nifty fifty, a vintage 50mm 1.4 SMC Takumar (radioactive 7 element version)
Thanks for the video! I have been up and down the dial with this issue. It's taken me time to get more comfortable and better with the wider focal lengths coming from the 50mm and 85mm. Over the years I've tried two fixed lens 28mm (Ricoh GRiii and Leica Q2), a 35 mm equiv. Fuji X100 and now I have the Ricoh griiix at 40mm which I like. But I think about getting the Ricoh GRiii at 28mm in addition from those times I want that context. I don't like getting too close, but would love to get comfortable with the 28mm. I made the mistake of thinking my discomfort with street photography was fixable with a different focal length when really it was a mental game that could be solved up here *tapping my head*.
thanks for watching! and i empathize man. going from 50 to 35 can be a massive jump, as a lot of what makes one special, isn’t always there in the other. 40 is such a great perspective, i can go on and on 😂 and i’m inclined to agree! an unfit focal length can definitely put you in areas you may not be ready for, but at the end of the day, you’re right it’s all mindset 🙏🏾
Was using 35 for a 3 years and sometimes was not 100% , sold it (but the lens was awesome ) and got now 17-28 2.8 + 85mm 1.8 ( think that Kombination is good for me )
So 28 is for people with enough balls to get close. Or to sneakily capture people on the edge of the frame because it looks less like you're pointing directly at them.
Confident, yes. Aside from that, you don’t have to strictly get close to make good photos with it, and you definitely don’t have to be “stealthy” or sneaky.
I think I read in the past that 40mm is the equivalent of a human eyes pov which is why 35mm feels good/natural. Obviously not peripheral vision as that is wider but focused eyesight
i’m inclined to agree. i’ve spent a lot of time with 40mm over the years, and it almost feels like your sight isn’t changing when you raise the camera to your eye
I've been struggling with my 28 mm lense equivalent for a couple of months and try to find any tips and any understanding about the lenses from youtube, your explanations really helps me so much understanding this focal length. Thank you bro
All good. Some astutely presented thoughts about the two focal lengths. Listen up all. :) It's funny, 28mm many years ago was incredibly difficult for me. It was actually shooting around the world with one of the early Ricoh GR Digitals that brought me over to it - trial by fire. But even today I find myself torn between the two as a favorite and every time that happens I'm reminded why I abso-fuggin-lutely *adore* the Pentax FA 31mm. It's always been a touch larger (the size of the lens) than I really like, but even still I adapt it too mirrorless with regularity because it's just too good. It's in my top-3 all time over the almost 14 years I've had one, simply for how comfortable it makes me and the shots it's helped me see and realize. The inbetweener.
trial by fire is the name of the game for us photographers! you really gotta love those odd, in between focal lengths. they help make a camera / lens system special. glad you found a piece of your “forever kit”
Such a good video, love the way you think and the video editing was so fluid with great pictures! I started with 35 but 28 is definitely my daily lens and it made me progress so much. Keep doing 🫶
Man this video was excellent. So concise, quick, to the point and with great examples and going beyond the basic information and giving the actual nuanced discussion. Good rhythm too. Hell yeah.
much love Evan, thank you 🙏🏾
When I was in Vietnam in 68/69 I carried two Nikon f. One had a 35mm and the other had the 28mm. Worked for me.
The other photographers in the unit thought I was crazy. But I had many of my photos get into the weekly marine newsletter.
PS I was crazy.
Awesome story! Sometimes when we pursue excellence, people think we’re crazy for it 🤝
This is one of the best videos on this subject I have ever seen. Thank you. I love 35 for street but have been wanting more, so considering 28. Your comments on the amount of people in your city plays an impact on your focal length choice was one I hadn't considered...
Glad it was helpful! Try out that 28 🔥
I come from shooting landscapes and use a telephoto a lot for that but I found the 28 works so well for the street. With a 50 I found it was difficult to create layers and depth, the 35 felt a bit boring sometimes but the 28 just felt right and gives you a sense of being right there. The chaos can sometimes be a bit hard to control though, sometimes that's a good thing, sometime it's not.
What a well-written, tightly-reasoned and well-stated piece! In addition to being a longtime serious photographer, I write professionally for broadcast. So I know how hard it is to write about anything, let alone another mode of expression. It's like dancing about poetry. You pull it off, when so many others don't. Thanks!
I appreciate the compliments! 🤝
I laughed out loud with your "Move in close: buy a mouth guard" photo tip! I enjoyed this one and will check out some of your videos!!
lol thanks! you’ll see that i love to crack jokes 😂
Just me, but I skipped the 28mm after decades of using 35mm as my "standard" street lens. I instead went to 24mm. This rewards me with a true different look for the effort of changing glass.
One cool trick with the 35mm/24mm combo... the 24mm being held vertically (portrait mode) has the same edge to edge coverage as the 35mm held horizontally (landscape mode) at a constant distance. This give you the ability to emphasize height or width for the subject depending on the environment.
This is of course personal. A new shooter should do a 100% immersion with a single lens and really get to know it before cluttering their brain with choices.
that’s interesting! many (myself included) as super challenging. i agree though, figuring out the characteristics of one lens, initially, gives you an idea of how to notice the uniqueness of others.
With high Megapixel cameras, one can always crop in to make a shorter focal length pic.
You can't make a 35mm pic into a 28mm.
True I prefer the 28mm any day
Yeah but if you were to shoot from the same spot with both, you'd have lower the f-stop on the 28mm to achieve the same depth of field when cropped in to match the 35mm.
You could take a few steps back.
@@youravantgarde that changes the composition. Cropping in doesn't
If I travel with friends or family, it's 35. Travel alone, 28. In the good old film days, 35 was the standard lens for point-and -shoot cameras because of its versatility. Now we can crop so 28 potentially offers even more but then the subject had better be in the center. They are both good primes to have, both can be put into good use. Don't get a kit zoom though, the aperture is usually too small. You might as well use your iphone
Our preferences are reversed. If traveling with family, I am physically close to them so getting a good shot with 28mm is easy. 35mm works better for photographing strangers. I actually travel with both lenses. One in pocket and one in camera. Micro four thirds system. Pancake lens not much bigger than a roll of film.
I respect how you section things off!
I almost spent thousands to buy the xf 85 mm for night photography but when I discovered the works of garry winogrand and daido moriyama, i was blown away with the many details that a 28 mm can capture. i started using the 28 mm and man the results I got are something I would never imagine myself taking ever in my life.
glad that you’re making work that you love and learning about those before us. keep that going! 🚀
@@doriyancoleman for sure! i love photography and it's a whole world itself. I still have lots of it to explore and I'll keep exploring. I appreciate what you do on youtube, sharing your perspective on these technical stuff. keep them videos coming :))
I still find it a bit strange how many people are saying 35mm is boring. Most smartphone main cameras are between 24-28mm. That's all we see most of the time. 35mm isn't common, thus isn't boring, in my opinion.
many people just make excuses 😂
Focal lengths aren't boring. Photos may be boring but it's certainly not down to the lens used :)
Why the focus on fl, you can always zoom with your feet
great line about the 28mm...."move in and buy a mouth guard"
you did a great job on this video, helped me a lot... samples of cropability were cool
Glad my video helped!
Love using the 28mm Lux on my Leica M11P. Love it so much I just added the 21mm Super Elmer… even more fun 😊
Excellent take on the never ending question of 'best street lens'. Fabulous photos.
Thank you Ken 🤝
Henri Cartier-Bresson did a pretty good job with his 50mm lens, ya know. 😉. Seriously, all focal lengths work. I shot at 28mm today, and it was fine. I have many shots taken at 50mm and 60mm, on up to 90mm, and all went well. Of course the tighter the street, the more 50mm or less seems best. But there are times when shooting across the way works out well, or is simply a necessity, at which time that 28mm will need a huge crop-down. And I get it that when you are but three to six feet of subject, you can really use that wide lens. Of all the lens choices the most forgiving, framing wise, and for lack of distortions is the 50mm. At this time however, I am moving to the 35mm and 28mm field of view to see how much more story I get, that up close and personal feel, as you described, and even how unrelated works within a photo. Yes, in a real world there is a focus you are viewing, along with other unrelated, yet possibly offering a balance or an offset to the story going on -- heck, maybe three unrelated things happening??? It all works, portrait and wide urban landscapes. The current trend of ultra sharp, stand-out shots of people, with a blurred out background, might not hold up over time. When first viewed, as in something new and with a certain shock appeal, it first seems cool -- very cool! Then you realize it is a super sharp image of nothing, with no story at all. Just a portrait. Anyway, that 28mm or even 35mm when close can distort human faces, or when the camera is a tilt, the whole world, buildings and all wiggle and waggle, thus it is a little more the challenge when having to quick-draw shoot. Might be why Henri liked the 50mm, or the framing thing? It is a good challenge -- I am going for it. 28 and 35mm this month! To get to my site on the web, search my full name, Loren.
Great video! One of the critiques of 28mm is closeness to your subject, something we're afraid of, but on the flip side, I find myself "exposed" more by people on the street who notice me taking a photo of them when I'm actually farther away from them rather than closer. Think about it, no one would think you can take a sharp photo of someone that close, or there is anything worth taking a photo of that close (admittedly I'm never under anyone's chin close)...
that’s an interesting point when you get into the psychology of it 🤔
Love how concise this was! Kudos.
How I think about it for everyday photography: if I’m shooting the people I’m sitting & talking with and don’t want to step away, 28mm is the way to go. If I’m shooting stuff that catches my eye, or interactions happening outside my personal space, I pick the 35mm.
Thanks! That’s a great way to think of it 🤜🤛
Good video; matches my experience. I shoot Sony and often carry their 28/2 in addition to a mounted 35. That lens is small, light , and cheap so easy to own and tuck in a pocket. Nice to have when things feel tight.
I love my Leica Q2 with its 28mm with its crop feature, and my Voigtlander Vito B with its 50mm.
fully agree. 50mm was/is considered the 'to go portrait lens'... always comes with the finest bokeh and people love it like a soy sauce. have a boring image - but shot at 1.4 - they love it. i think that's the reason the starting wanna be street photographer grab 50mm (don't want to insult anybody). i love the sentence 'the longer you do street photography, the wider you go'. street photography is about it... life on street. it's tough to show a photo where you don't show the life. the interaction of the street elements. that beautiful shot by andre wagner of the kid dribbling the basketball. where would you have to stand to shoot it with 50mm. i think the more i see the photographer be close to their subjects on the street and you say 'one feels immersed in the picture'. i think that is the sole reason for that feeling. the guy was THERE in the moment. He is right next to the kids. that is why everybody can feel the 'immersion' . so the only way to be able to do that - lens must go wide(r). great video, doriyan, gotta follow you :)
many great points all throughout your comment! it’s funny, because I’ve truly gotten to a point where 40mm is about the longest i like to go.
what you said about immersion and truly being present in the moment has a lot of legitimacy to it. street photography is a beautiful thing! i appreciate you sharing and following 🙏
This might be the best, most concise way of describing the differences between these two lenses I've heard. A 5 minute masterclass. Great job!
thank you so much! glad you got some value out of it
I own the Pancake lenses..... I currently have a Canon 40mm 2.8 STM that I use on my 1DX MK III and my Canon 5DSR .... just added a RF 28mm 2.8 STM to my Eos R (this combo belongs together) ..... I also own the Canon 50mm EF 1.4 USM that I use on my Canon 5DSR for large 50 mp portraits ...... It's nice having a couple of prime lenses.... never tried a 35mm, and thanks for your perspective !!!!
Considering you like all of though, 35mm may be worth a try! Thanks for watching 🤜🤛
I was tired of losing teeth so I switched back to 35mm😭 all kidding aside, I always enjoy your thoughts on the cerebral aspects when it comes to focal length and what they represent. Those thoughts combined with memes and cartoon inserts just hit right, man. Enjoyed this one!
😂 thank you man! both are so much fun (and safe) to use, all jokes aside as well lol. you did your thing with your photos!
Oh HELL YEAH, I'm now a subscriber to this channel! Smart arguments, brilliant advice, transparent, and genuine. You helped me decide on which focal length I need to use for when and where. But I will follow your advice going between 28mm, which will capture more "thick action" shots, and 35mm, which will get more specific. But to your point, both win depending on what story you tell and shooting style. Doriyan, you are truly talented! Thank you for sharing your thoughts and making this video, cheers.
Coming to this comment late, but thank you for the kind words. Glad I could help you out!
Great points -and loved the Harryhausen-esque stop-motion dinosaur intro. And "Nighthawks!"
Thank you! Nighthawks is a favorite
Excellent video - I love the 28mm field of view, its my natural vision.
thank you! it’s definitely an engaging one to use
Once I started using a 28mm, I sold my 35mm because it never got used after that...nice video sir!
I appreciate it!
Nice job regarding the differences in using the 28mm vs 35mm. My belief is that the wider the lens angle of view, the more skill is required of the photographer to make a compelling image. Best wishes in your photographic endeavours.😊
You may be on to something! Thanks and you as well 🤝
Good information as always man. My default is always 35mm, but I love playing with 28mm and 50mm as well.
thank you! always fun to branch out and try something different
Good day Doriyan, I was just going through this with my own system, I was using a 28m full frame lens on crop sensor and now went full frame. I thought I wouldn't like 28mm FOV at all but turn out I do not mind it at all. Again its all personal taste, but we all shouldn't be afraid to try something new we may like.
man when I tell you that I was initially the exact same way when it came to 28mm. seemed too wide, too intimidating, but it’s so much fun to use!
like you said, we should at least try things before we come to a conclusion! happy shooting 💪🏾
I really enjoyed that video! You have many interesting descriptions that kept my attention and gave me a chuckle. Good discussion of the various aspects.
I like 28 and 50 and don't have a 35 because I feel it to be a blah middle. While I don't shoot "street", I do like architecture as you presented it. So the images met my expectations from the title.
Careful to not go too wide - you could end up with Detroit in the frame!
Glad you enjoyed the video Mike! Thats funny because I love how 35 can often be a best of both worlds for me. Take care!
“Buy a mouth guard” 😂
Great video Doriyan. Both are great options. And yeah, a 40 would be a better pair with the 28.
😂 all jokes for fun!
thank you, and yeah the 18mm f2 and 27mm 2.8 mk ii have had my interest for a while. need to try them out!
I love Cleveland! Nice to see someone taking their craft seriously! 👍🏾
Thanks for watching! 🤝
I just tried 40mm street photos on a rollei 35, it’s tight but pretty fun ☺️✌🏽 definitely recommend it
someday i’ll try it out!
Dude the info presented and the vibe of this video is fantastic. Thank you
glad you enjoyed it!
I use a 8.1 megapixel Ricoh gr digital with the 28mm equivalent lens. I have the 21mm adaptor lens but prefer the 28
nice setup! 28mm is the way to go!
“With higher degree of information comes higher degree of variation”. Thanks uncle photographer Ben
i need to rewatch this and see what i said 😂
Sam Abell is a master of 28mm documentary style photography. I think he’s compositionally one of the strongest photographers of the street/documentary genre. Well worth looking at his work. Primarily used a 28 and 90.
thanks i’ll have to check him out!
Standard lens you own is 50mm then next is 35mm , not wide enough just a bit wider so 28mm is the best general for most occasions . I recommend 4 lens that I personal pick , 50mm , 28mm , 21mm and 90mm . If you have these 4 will cover all you need . I shoot range finder manual cameras .
That’s a great setup!
That was a good discussion of a rather topical subject, well done and thanks!
much love Richard! 🙏🏾
Great video. Really comprehensive. I went for 40mm ;)
Enjoy yourself 📸
Excellent video. Good descriptions and explanations. Quick and easy. Congratulations.
Much love! 🤜🤛
I like the 35 & 50mm. I do like the 28 mm focal length! However the one that I own does not always performed as I would like. (barrel distortion.) Yes of course I know how to remedy this problem. Priorities have to come first. Awesome video.
I just started shooting street photography… I’ve got 135, 85, 58, 50, 35 and 28mm lenses. So far my favorite are 50mm and 85mm. Easier to compose and I’m still feeling uncomfortable coming close to people… but I’m still trying to use the 35mm lens.
They say that the longer you shoot, the wider you tend to go. It’ll feel more natural as time goes on
Thank you for your astute insight. Definitely going to give 40mm more shutter time...
thank you! they’re all great. 40mm is versatile, challenging and rewarding
Nice video. // I have a Canon 28mm ultrasonic f/1.8. Beautiful lens.... It's wide, but not exaggerating wide. It has great image IQ. // Maybe 24mm would be better... but I'm not going to get another wide angle lens just for an additional 4mm.
- The wider fish-eye lenses look intriguing... but they are slow. Even f/2.8 seems dubious.
Thanks for the on point talk and examples mate! Great vid
Came to your channel for the first time. Excellent video. Thanks for the information.
welcome to the community, thank you 🙏🏾
The advice to buy a mouth guard if you're going try street photography with a 28mm lens made me smile. I like the perspective of how the choice of focal length changes the demands on the photographer. As a beginner, I never thought of it that way.
i said some wild stuff in this video 😂 but yeah, as you experiment with focal lengths you’ll see that your approach will likely change a bit as well
Thanks for all the tips, I have been shooting with a 40 mm on my M cameras, and it's worked out really well for me but I feel like the next lens should be a 28 for those environmental and architectural street work.
you’re welcome! give it a shot! should make for a nice visual refresh
I love to see us making content like this . We need more of us . Would love to hit the streets with you one day
you’re gonna love some of the next videos then 🙏🏾 hit me up!
@@doriyancoleman most definitely I got to make my way up there
daamn this video is excellent, this finally made me realise why I dislike 24mm. I'm just not good enough for that much information in my frame yet, also our little streets are empty, it does not work properly with that angle
Glad you got some value from it! Yeah 24mm is an interesting one, largely depends on your “canvas”. Thanks!
Outstanding video, thanks Dorian. I purchased a 28mm based on this. Already have the 40mm :)
glad you enjoyed it! 🙏🏾
Amazing examples. 28mm look incredible! Nice and thank you!!
thank you! give it a try if you haven’t already 💪🏾
I just found your 35 vs 50 video and then this one and loved them both. Really great stuff. I’m glad I found your channel as so many of your other video topics interest me. Thanks man.
Thank you, welcome aboard!
Dude, what an informative and well structured video. Gained a sub. Thanks for this
much love antoine 🙏🏾
Great points. Solid video! Would you get the Ricoh GRIIIx?
i’d consider it! i’ve used 40mm a lot throughout the years, and enjoy the perspective. i do like the freedom of interchangeable lenses tho, that’s the tough part
Dope video, I personally bounce between 35mm and 50mm.
the street photography bread & butter 💪🏾
Nice concise video. I've mostly been shooting 35mm, but I'm definitely feeling like a little bit more context could be good sometimes. No doubt I'd run into the same problem that you mentioned, where the subject is lost in the frame. I'm also starting to play around with 40mm. 50mm is far too tight for me.
thanks! yeah while 28mm doesn’t “feel” like a far number from 35, you really get a different experience from it.
i also feel you with 50mm, it’s just not for me 😅
Thanks! This video is a gem - very very thoughtful.
glad you enjoyed it! welcome 🔥
30mm is the perfect FL for everyone and iam happy with panasonic leica 15mm f1.7 its a truly gem in photography universe
i would definitely be interested in a 30mm equiv. focal length to replace the 18mm f/2 on the x-system
Great job my boi. Love the breakdown. It’s 28mm till I die.
thank you bro! you and Lee helped open me up to 28mm. sticking with it 🙏🏾
Amazing video. So many talking heads just talk about the look, composition, etc. You gave me more. I can totally relate to the challenges of getting your face in there with a 28mm. Sometimes that intimacy creates a moment you don't get with a longer prime, but regardless your video moved and inspired me. Just subscribed and can't wait to go through your content!
glad you enjoyed the video! welcome to the community 🙏🏾
I was born and raised in Cleveland. Love your shots. Great advice. Sub.
Thank you! Take care.
Great video Dorian on an unsung hero and almost forgotten focal length..yeah, you have to work a lot harder and smarter than 35mm 🙂
Thank you! 28mm and 40mm (for that matter) are a lot of fun.
I started with a 50 but most of the streets where I live are quite narrow so the 50 always felt a bit cramped. I moved to the 28 recently and I like the additional room but it's still a bit intimidating to get close sometimes. Luckily with zone focusing being much easier on the 28 I can get in and out fast.
zone focusing with 28mm is so awesome 🙏🏾
Superb discussion of focal lengths. Thank you!
You’re welcome!
Well done- well presented....... San Franciscan street photog here..... good stuff...... thank you.........
thank you for watching John!
Bro you're awesome! thanks for this really informative video!
much love Adham 🙏🏾
21/35 has been my go to all over the world! :)
Great video! I love you went into great detail
Glad you enjoyed it Brian!
What a great comparison!
thank you!
Excellent video. Thanks.
You’re welcome! 🤝
Exactly what I was looking for!👍
ayeeee I'm glad this was what you needed 🙏🏾
With the right Fuji camera and using sports finder I can put on an 18mm pancake and then have 27 and 35 on the one camera without the need to carry another lens. Or 23mm gives me 35 and 44. Yeah there is less megapixels but man it’s a good option.
the homie dee rosa introduced that to me! still have yet to try it but it makes for a versatile degree of options
"and buy a mouth guard"! Ha!
I did a little bit of street photography at first with my EOS RP and 50 1.8. Nice, little combo.
But its true, 50mm is "tight", and since i have "downgraded" to APS-C i either have to rely on my 17-55 2.8 lens or in the case of cities i also use the 10-20mm 3.5 lens for architecture and so.
But on APS-C a classic 50mm is also interesting for 75-80mm for street and portrait! In which i really like my actual nifty fifty, a vintage 50mm 1.4 SMC Takumar (radioactive 7 element version)
The 75-85mm zone is a lot of fun, I agree. 50 can take some getting used to as well. Have fun out there!
Just picked up my first 28mm, and I've been cropping the hell out of my photos lol. I didn't realise how close I have to get to my subject.
I feel like that's definitely part of the learning curve. It'll start to feel natural as time goes on!
Thanks for the video! I have been up and down the dial with this issue. It's taken me time to get more comfortable and better with the wider focal lengths coming from the 50mm and 85mm. Over the years I've tried two fixed lens 28mm (Ricoh GRiii and Leica Q2), a 35 mm equiv. Fuji X100 and now I have the Ricoh griiix at 40mm which I like. But I think about getting the Ricoh GRiii at 28mm in addition from those times I want that context. I don't like getting too close, but would love to get comfortable with the 28mm. I made the mistake of thinking my discomfort with street photography was fixable with a different focal length when really it was a mental game that could be solved up here *tapping my head*.
thanks for watching! and i empathize man. going from 50 to 35 can be a massive jump, as a lot of what makes one special, isn’t always there in the other.
40 is such a great perspective, i can go on and on 😂
and i’m inclined to agree! an unfit focal length can definitely put you in areas you may not be ready for, but at the end of the day, you’re right it’s all mindset 🙏🏾
I'm rather fond of the 42mm f2 'standard' lens of my Contax G1 over the alternate 28mm f2.8 for 'street photography'.
The 40 range is great 👍🏾
Great video, thank you!
Sure thing Ben!
With my A7RV, I can use my Samyang 24mm and then put it in crop mode and achieve 36mm. Although I go from 61mp to 26mp which is fine.
36mm and still great for high resolution and quality prints 👍🏾
Buy a mouthguard! ha. Really enjoyed the video. Great description on how these lenses pan out in the real world.
28mm is so much fun lol, glad you enjoyed the video. 35 is my true love in this crazy world ❤️
Was using 35 for a 3 years and sometimes was not 100% , sold it (but the lens was awesome ) and got now 17-28 2.8 + 85mm 1.8 ( think that Kombination is good for me )
glad that’s working out for you 🤝
So 28 is for people with enough balls to get close. Or to sneakily capture people on the edge of the frame because it looks less like you're pointing directly at them.
Confident, yes. Aside from that, you don’t have to strictly get close to make good photos with it, and you definitely don’t have to be “stealthy” or sneaky.
Everything you say, I agree.
Thank you!
I love the 28 mm
“and buy a mouth guard” 😂🤣😂🤣😂 bravo, bravo, bravísimo
Glad you enjoyed it 😂🤝
@4:00 Strangely, I liked it uncropped. Oh, and I wonder what you think of those that shot from 90mm thru 150mm?
I think I read in the past that 40mm is the equivalent of a human eyes pov which is why 35mm feels good/natural. Obviously not peripheral vision as that is wider but focused eyesight
i’m inclined to agree. i’ve spent a lot of time with 40mm over the years, and it almost feels like your sight isn’t changing when you raise the camera to your eye
I've been struggling with my 28 mm lense equivalent for a couple of months and try to find any tips and any understanding about the lenses from youtube, your explanations really helps me so much understanding this focal length. Thank you bro
Glad you enjoyed the video 🤝
All good. Some astutely presented thoughts about the two focal lengths. Listen up all. :)
It's funny, 28mm many years ago was incredibly difficult for me. It was actually shooting around the world with one of the early Ricoh GR Digitals that brought me over to it - trial by fire. But even today I find myself torn between the two as a favorite and every time that happens I'm reminded why I abso-fuggin-lutely *adore* the Pentax FA 31mm. It's always been a touch larger (the size of the lens) than I really like, but even still I adapt it too mirrorless with regularity because it's just too good. It's in my top-3 all time over the almost 14 years I've had one, simply for how comfortable it makes me and the shots it's helped me see and realize. The inbetweener.
trial by fire is the name of the game for us photographers! you really gotta love those odd, in between focal lengths. they help make a camera / lens system special. glad you found a piece of your “forever kit”
Are we talking about 28 vs 35 crop sensor or full frame lenses?
35mm equivalent
I use a 28 and occasionally a 21 for street
28 40, 85 mm
28mm and 40mm are really speaking to me these days as well
Thank you! So helpful
glad it resonated with you!
I always forget I have a 28mm lens 😂
Can't wait to try it out next time I go out taking some pics
enjoy yourself bro 💪🏾
Great video, fab pics. Liked. Subscribed.
i appreciate it jeremy!
Such a good video, love the way you think and the video editing was so fluid with great pictures! I started with 35 but 28 is definitely my daily lens and it made me progress so much. Keep doing 🫶
glad you enjoyed it Thomas! thanks for the kind words 🙏🏾
Great vid, thanks!
absolutely! 💯