WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Day 10 - Jury Instructions by Judge Bruce Schroeder
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 ноя 2021
- Live Coverage: WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse - Kenosha Shooting
Jury Instructions & Closing Arguments
REMINDER of the judge's ruling in defense use of force expert testimony: Schroeder told the attorneys that Black wouldn’t be allowed to testify about what Rittenhouse was thinking when he pulled the trigger or whether he definitively acted in self-defense.
Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger said if Schroeder allowed Black to testify only about the timeline of events that night he wouldn’t call his own expert to the stand. Defense attorney Mark Richards agreed to the deal.
Charges:
1. First Degree Reckless Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Joseph Rosenbaum)
2. First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Richard
McGinnis, reporter for Daily Caller, not injured but near Rosenbaum when Rittenhoue
fired)
3. First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety, Use of a Deadly Weapon (unknown male)
4. First Degree Intentional Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Anthony Huber)
5. Attempt First Degree Intentional Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Gaige
Grosskreutz)
6. Possession of a Dangerous Weapon by a Person under the Age of 18 (JUDGE DISMISSED THIS COUNT ON THE DAY OF CLOSING ARGUMENTS)
7. DISMISSED AT THE END OF STATE”S CASE. Prosecution failed to put evidence in front of the jury that there was a lawful curfew in place (appears to be an oversight by prosecution) Defense moved to dismiss, judge agreed. Fail to Comply with Order of Local Government - Emergency Management Activity (citation, carries no penalty) - everyone present was breaking the 7pm curfew issued by the sheriff.
Possible Sentence: Max: Life in Prison Without Parole (WI does not have the DP)
JURY CHOSEN IN ONE DAY. 20 jurors have been selected in WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse. 9 men and 11 women. (8 are alternates)
Rittenhouse shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 26, and Anthony Huber, 26, and injured Gaige Grosskreutz, 27. Prosecutors say that Rittenhouse, then 17 and from Illinois, was a vigilante looking for a fight. He, like other right-wingers, went to Kenosha, Wisconsin ostensibly to protect property. This happened as protests over police shooting local man Jacob Blake turned violent. Rittenhouse’s attorneys assert he was acting in self-defense. This case became a cause célèbre among conservatives.
Prosecutors have struggled in court, failing to introduce evidence of prior aggressive behavior. This included evidence showing him attacking a woman who was in an altercation with his sister. The other is that he was closely linked to the violent, far-right Proud Boys organization.
Kenosha County Judge Bruce Schroeder said an appellate court would reverse him if he allowed these in trial. The evidence was too prejudicial, he said. He left it up in the air whether he would allow footage showing someone identified as Rittenhouse discussing a Black man exiting a CVS pharmacy. Rittenhouse believed the man was shoplifting.
#KyleRittenhouse #KenoshaShooting
Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on RUclipsTV!
tv.ruclips.net/user/welcome?...
OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
lawandcrime.com/where-to-watch/
Who To Follow On Twitter:
@LawCrimeNetwork
@LawCrimeVerdict
@Cathy Russon
@AddiTrialsStuff 
Развлечения
I’m starting to agree with Putin, America is destroying itself from the inside out
I'm British in the UK and I totally agree with Putin, that the west is destroying itself. Only ones who are destroying the west are the Left.
@@opollo haha iyt wasn't the "left", that voted for Brexshit you Muppet, You Gammon make me sick 🤮
@@kennyholland4731 Lol what a muppet.
@@kennyholland4731 read his comment again. The "west"
@@kennyholland4731 yeah it was ppl like myself who voted us out and thank God for that, cos you lot are idiots. Otherwise we be pandering to the EU rules still an paying a fortune for it.
I was done when they proved the prosecution told people to change statements. Then the cops. Man this is sick.
@@myway2653 True rittenhouse didnt deserve to die so im glad he didn't
@@myway2653 nobody deserves that. Im saying the prosecution tried to get people to lie. They ruined case. Even thier friends lied. So sad
@@myway2653 they didn't die because they were protesting.
@@myway2653 the first guy threatened to rip out his heart and said he'd kill him. Tried to grab Kyle's gun and found out that was a bad idea. Second idiot smashed a retreating Kyle in the head with a skateboard. He found out that was a bad idea. 3rd guy pulled a gun on Kyle. His right arm found out that was a bad idea. Those weren't protestors they were terrorists. Should have watched the trial not CNN
@@myway2653 it was way beyond protesting you obviously haven't been paying attention!
The only people that don’t think its self defense, are people that didn’t watch any of the trial, they just going off what the news says
Most people believe and do WHATEVER CNN says
@@niciassmith1204 exactly
Or the ppl who want to go roit again in the future
I guess if you were in the military you’re getting chased kicked and a firearm pointed at you you should not defend yourself. As far as I’m concerned that was a war zone defend your self……..
@Oside Foto 3/4 of a second..... That's how fast it took for 4 shots to go off. Don't try to frame it like he shot once and then decided to put 3 more shots into him while he was on the ground.
Key note!!! Beyond a reasonable doubt.
75 years of law experience in the court… can’t decide how to instruct the jury to do their job.
Rogue clerk?
75 years ? Did you learn math on the back of a Cornflakes box ? 37 years & never been in a complex case like this, its Only Generation Z that have cried & sabotaged cities because they have lost democratic votes
These are unintelligible. Glad I don't have to decipher them.
Leave it to lawyers to make instructions on deciding a mans fate impossible to understand.
The only thing I worry about is that the jury will be in fear of repercussions for a not guilty verdict?
I'm not American and I shan't comment on this case as it's non of my business. I will say this though, for an American judge he is rather better than could otherwise be expected. Very proffessional.
you're still allowed to comment on the case if you're familiar with American law and also with the controversies behind what the case is about. internet is a free place to say whatever you want (for now)
Why, are you hostile to the American judicial system?
@@Tom-kt8lu I'm not hostile to an American judicial system at all. I think it would be a great idea.
It will take the first week to decide what the instructions reveal.
Your right to defend yourself with deadly force is on trial here. This will be precident in self defence trials going forth
Technically it wouldn’t be a law precedent. Every other situation would still have to be evaluated independently.
But yes, it would be a cultural precedent.
Or u can just stay home and not go looking for trouble
@@cannon0587 it’s not what happened
@@cannon0587 Yes while looters burn your city to the ground🙄 Cowardice is why we have the issues we do these days. Everyone is hiding at home hoping someone else will do something
@@Alexandra-xt1vf You have the situation in the U.S. because of massive wealth inequality. Not because of lazy people
Geezuz. Didn't the judge even proof the document before reading aloud to jury?
This judge reminds me of the dad on Everyone loves Raymond.
This is a cluster you know what
Reasonable Person...comes from the comment by the English Master of Rolls in 1918 in a case where he said, " What would the the man on the Clapham Omnibus think" taking that man as a reasonable, common person.
did you stricken the fact that two people are dead and one critical condition
If you can't come to the reasonable conclusion of "not guilty", you are not competant to participate in the politics of this nation and should cease immediately for the greater good.
IfI ever serve on a jury I will never find the defendant guilty… not after seeing how the prosecution is allowed to lie to the jury and make up evidence not in testimony. So disheartened by our justice system. Never knew. My eyes are open
This comment alone will erase the chance you ever could serve on a jury. Well done.
I agree. Hard to believe that a young man's future is on the table and to believe the prosecutors the jurors would have to be idiots. I had no idea that the justice system worked like this. Disheartened as well.
Hey judge, your wife called. You left your Klan robes at home.
I have served on 4 Grand Jury. I have never been selected for a trial jury (mainly because if my time on the GJ), HOWEVER if I ever do get selected for a trial jury I will have to take anything a cop saids with a grain of salt.
The courts has given them the right to lie to citizens, and they think it does not stop there.
And yes the DA are in it to get points ...where we were, the more convictions DAs got more points for a raise. The DA would bring things to us (the Grand Jury) that they knew the person did not do as they said, however was hoping for an indictment.
@@benhurst Your daddy (who is also your older brother) is calling around looking for you. They said you miss the short bus that takes you to school and you have not shown up for class yet.
You are fortunate..at lease you know who your daddy is (unlike your bros)..even though he is your older brother
57:18 exactly
Mockery of Justice
Justice has to be seen to be done, this case has be pressed with a lot venom by the prosecution. The end result hopefully will be called justice.
JUSTICE HAS BEEN SERVED. NOT GUILTY
I understand the need to give jury information and instructions in excruciating detail, but it is very dull to listen to. 🥱
Be grateful, in some jurisdictions this would take 3 days (15 hours).
@@Tom-kt8lu
😵💫😵💫😵💫
13:59 goml drop
Binger should take lessons from the Defendant’s Attorney
IF these professionals, who went to college and got paid educations to understand all these instructions and charges, How do they expect an average every day person to whole heartedly without question understand? I can listen to RUclips video instructions tell and show me for hours how to do heart surgery. But do I still know how to after I turn the video off lol
I wouldn't do surgery on anyone if I were you but if you were on a deserted island and it was a life and death matter good luck to you and your patient!
Good judges aren’t like this.
They read all the instructions through at first, but when the jury actually deliberates they proceed from the instructions which explain everything applicable in bite sized pieces again and again, so no, there's no pressure to mentally digest and completely assimilate each point at the outset. It's not as intimidating as it sounds because everything is explained very well with each consideration. It's prepared properly for easy comprehension.
Set him free. Pure simple self defense. God bless him. God bless America.
God doesn’t exist, we made him up.
@April Theres literally 0 proof of his existence.
@@ZaMonolith1986 there is literally no proof He does not exist
I felt this judge to be half intelligent/on spot, half goofy. It bothered me.
Reminds me of the dad on Everyone loves Raymond.
In Jesus name, take this in your hands, and help this young man, amen
Jesus came to rid us of the hate in people like you
HAIL SATAN WELCOME OUR OFFERING KYLE.
@@J.Artan6 amen brother 🤣
Help him find his way to cell block A. Also does your Bible say you can pray through RUclips comments?
@@dougsteel7414 no hate here, I've seen the evidence thanks to everyone videos..... hate was going on that night, but justice was served that night as well. God bless you
When there is a mob and riots, maybe you should fire sime bullets and the streets are clear. Simply clever. No one pay attention ti this. Broken cars. Shattered glass. The are like huenas.
Self defense.
This judge seems like a bad fit for a court
Dude is guilty af.
Prove it. And... last I checked.... He's innocent until PROVEN guilty.
@@pinheadlarry9495 That’s why they’re in court. Wow you really are dumb. And he’s guilty.
@@DK-yh4xt I was commenting on Mac's unsolicited verdict. Clearly. You really are dumb aren't you?
@@pinheadlarry9495 Nice try troll. Maybe you need to learn what courts do LOL
WHY WAS HE THERE WITH AN ASSAULT WEAPON
Why didnt you ask why there were convicted felons there pointing firearms at minors????
Why were the rioters there lighting cars on fire and chasing and trying to kill people trying to put out those fires?
He went there (illegally because by law he should even have a gun) to shoot people. Lol @ self defense. He’ll get life in prison if there is any justice.
@@DK-yh4xt you can own a rifle under the age of 18 in many states and he had more of a right to be there than any rioters. He cleaned graffiti and helped people, he didnt set cars on fire or go out of his way to assault people. He only fired on those who attacked and showed incredible awareness of his gun and the rounds he fired. If you watched the trial you would know he did nothing wrong.
@@DK-yh4xt they aren't even charging him of that, they dropped because that was all a lie perpetrated by leftwing media. I legally owned my first gun at 16
American judges apparently don’t deliver jury instructions in very approachable language.
Judge: "You shouldn't repeat yourself lest you lose your audience"
Same judge: "I am saying the exact same thing over and over again, please do act like you're still awake"
He’s the judge. That’s the job of the prosecution and the defense
FYI - there were numerous counts against the defendant. They are all very similar in description. He has to read each one out to the Jury. These were the counts:
First-degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
First-degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
First-degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
Attempted first-degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
First-degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18
Failure to comply with an emergency order from state or local government
The state threw everything at this case, the last two counts were thrown out during the trial.
I question if the average American is capable of making sound judgment on this case.
After watching this crap show unfold...I can already see a mistrial! It seems like everyone involved is doing their best to muddle everything up! That jury has to be completely confused 🤔🧐🤪🤬😵
Kyle is American hero in my mind
Pray for this youngman free kyle 🙏
@@michaelstebbins6725 Anthony Huber and Gaige Grosskreutz are heroes for attempting to stop an active shooter.
Not guilty!
Not guilty by reason of the constitution of the United States.
There needs to be a Vatican 2 for arcane legal definitions so people can understand it
Somebody has sabotaged his notes.
He was immaturely using bad judgment to be there in the first place with a gun at his age , but , with that said , he had a right to defend himself. There are LAWS for self defense no matter what Situation a person is in.
Kyle was doing what he could for his community, while rioters and arsonists descended on Kenosha from out of state.
The world is better due to his actions.
Huh? Very confusing.
If our 17 year old son dressed himself like GI Joe, complete with loaded NR15 loaded, strapped on rifle to attend a protest, I would think we had done something wrong in our parenting.
But that's just me.
True
Kyle on the other hand. He was there to protect Kenosha from such dissipation. He did the job of medical staff, the fire department, the police, and that of a good citizen all in one night. First. It's sad that you can't see that. Second. You don't have a shred of courage compared to this boy. Spineless people like you are the reason Kyle was there. You weren't there to help. You weren't there to stop lawlessness. You are a coward.
@@pinheadlarry9495
Your name says it all. It doesn't take courage to do what the killer kid did. It takes a deranged mind. It's scary that you don't realize that. He will walk because of that judge. And he will kill again.
You are so uninformed and wrong. Your original comment shows you have no clue.
1. He wasn't dressed up like a GI Joe.
2. Kyle didn't have an "NR15"
3. Kyle didn't "attend a protest"
He was there after 2 days of violent rioting, looting, arson, murders going on in the community he worked. He was there to prevent more harm to local people and local businesses. He was there because you weren't. You couldn't stand up in the face of outright lawlessness and try to make a difference. There is so much proof he wasn't there to shoot people. He only shot the people that tried to kill him. Period. 100% of th people that didn't assault, attempt to harm, or attempt to murder kyle are all alive right now. He was there stopping people from breaking the law an to stop more harm and people tried to kill him for it. Here's a question. How many of the violet rioters have you complained about?
If Kyle walks it won't be because of the judge. It will be because everything I've stated is factual and the prosecution couldn't prove otherwise
Long live Kyle with his freedom
Why was he there at a protest with an AR15 across state lines with ( an extremely lethal firearm ) He was looking for a fight
@@robertdove807 because not everybody was sitting on their hands while our cities and communities were being set ablaze and looted by rioters and arsonists. Kyle was one of the few who took an active role in responding to what was happening. If you're going to "defund the police", then citizens will need to be able to defend themselves and their communities. If an angry mob chases someone down, it's likely with ill intent, and they can't be too surprised if people defend themselves. The basic lessons here: don't chase people down, and don't burn down the neighborhood or loot businesses. Simple.
@@JustinStender i’m one of those people that was sitting watching comfortably on my couch. I completely agree with you Justin. Let us not forget the countless people who are scrubbing graffiti off of churches and buildings cleaning up the streets after the mess that these rioters made.
@@robertdove807 why would those people attack him knowing he had an AR-15??? See I can play the why game
God bless this mess
Intent to commit if and or harm
Prosecutor not interested in justice or truth: Rioters were Heros? Those who tried to kill Rittenhouse were interested in stopping him from hurting others?
They watched him gun down a man then run away from the scene. Rittenhouse was an active shooter who Huber and Grosskreutz tried to stop. They are heroes.
Bringing a powerful, provocative weapon like that to a protest event was a completely blatant and unacceptable threat of violence in and of itself. Combine that with the certainty of some unbalanced demonstrators on edge and you get this kind of tragedy. In no way should Kyle walk away unpunished.
No. You can carry a weapon. Whether you think it's scary or not doesn't matter.
A gun in and of itself is not a threat and in fact that type of thinking is a threat to public safety.
Maybe his actions weren't wise, but they were certainly not illegal.
Protest event? You surely mean riot? Stop sugar coating what it was. It was riot.
Do you feel the same way about Grosskreutz's Glock, which was concealed until he decided it had a use to him?
I just want to bear hug Kyle and protect him from anything and everything.
I think he’s got that covered
@@micktaylor5205 I hope so.
Just make sure he doesn't have a gun on him
2.20, Saying this in itself seems that he should be found not guilty. They were going DAMAGE that boy, they weren't playing.
When he had multiple attacks upon him, they were going to put him hospital or a COFFIN. If they ended up with his gun, all over.
GOD BLESS AMERICA.
Taking an assault weapon to the streets is reckless and escalation of danger. He is not even of age to own it. He obviously intented to kill shooting several times in one victim. He could of shot to the leg not chest. He could of shot to the air. He is guilty!!!
You are not as smart as you think you are.
In case you are not aware, knowingly and willing shooting someone in the leg as a "self defense" claim can get you jail time for maiming... just saying
Your argument is based on anyone taking a gun onto the streets being reckless and escalation of danger, so you should be fighting for the gun laws to change, that is a very different argument to self-defence, after all, the individual who got injured was pointing a Glock handgun at Rittenhouse's head, whilst the other two tried to take Rittenhouse's gun from him, which he was not pointing at anyone.
.I happen to agree with you that taking a gun onto the streets is reckless and escalation of danger, however, I live in the UK, and that act is aggression, so self-defence would be very hard to prove, as it's not a right of UK Citizens to carry arms in public, in the USA, it is different, they have a right to be armed.
Innocent
If Kyle was our son, he'd get punishment from us just for going there. And worst of all, he went there at 17 and with a dangerous weapon. If he had to defend himself, that's one thing. He shouldn't have put himself in a position to kill others. He's carrying a weapon into a situation like that. None of this had to occur, but he put himself there.
At a minimum, his actions were reckless and dangerous.
Excuse me, he was there to help, first aid. Some people have to take action to help. Dudes are idiots for approaching a man with an AR.
@@magsec5 Was it legal for a 17 year old to carry an AR-15? And please... he was acting like a reserve officer. Of course, he's going to help if asked. I didn't see anything about that though. He was flexing towards others with his rifle.
Absolutely, horrible guidance from his parents! WTF is he even going over there for? Why do so many people think that he is justified for doing this? You just don't go looking for trouble? If he walks then we will see many more of this vigilante BS in the future. Fox news will have this clown on their show claiming that he is a hero and an American patriot. Donald had his back from day 1 which is very disturbing.
Yeah, my thoughts exactly. I’m from U.K., and I’m not disputing your second amendment rights, or the right to self defence, but taking a AR to a riot was a bad idea. He is not a hero, he is a naive young man, that killed two and maimed one. He may not be found guilty of the charges brought against him, but he is not innocent.
@@grumby111 he didn't break any laws. At all.
Innocent. Amen 🙏
Self-defense: A perfect argument of self-defense proves all elements of self-defense, and results in the defendant's acquittal. Not guilty!
🐑In the lambs book of life the movie threatres still have lines between adult and children because children need molding. I know a guy who worked in the union and brought his son along at 17 on the sites of real men ethics with heavy duty machinary and hard hats areas.
More sniveling.
Mach Schau!👏
Mach Schau 👏
u are a looter right?
@@onilchannel6561 Hahahahah
This judge isn't explaining anything except for why you can't convict on a charge...he probably said "self defense / reasonable doubt" at least 100 times.
Guilty
Guilty of self defense
Judge should resign...slow to think and respond..
Smarter than you. Far smarter than you. And your president
He is thinking of 70 years of experience. Not everything is straightforward. He did a good job.
59:15, Odd, the defense said, ' just what we said ' to the judge, as if the case was already decided, that suggests collusion between the bench and the defense, a freudian slip perhaps, definitely questionable.!!!
The judge and both sides decide together what the instructions will be. I think you’re jumping to conclusions.
The only people that hurt or killed were the ones that were attacking him case closed!!!!
Judge should follow his own advice
shhh looter
Every person shot had a criminal record, kyle is a hero! The one who lived wasn’t able to use his weapon, he was stopped via a shot to the arm holding the gun he would have used on the young man.
The judge is well-intentioned, but he does give the impression of being very confused. Are judges normally this bumbly?
No, this is not normal for a judge. Probably just old age. I have gotten very strange impressions from him this entire trial.
At least he isn't in bed with the prosecution like most US judges
He is reading. Lol.. I don't see what the issue is. Can you imagine reading the same jargon 5 times over..
S-E-N-I-L-I-T-Y
In all my experiences with participating in legal proceedings I have never seen a judge so ill prepared to give the jury instruction. He needs to retire.
I’m sure he was always like that.
this judge needs meds he doesnt seem all there
Justice will be honored free Kyle free him 🙏
He better be found not guilty or else shits gonna go down
In Jesus name , maritime law no longer applies, common/gods law dud.
This judge in my opinion is not good at clearly explaining the law to the jury. This means that he may have made it more difficult for the jury to reach an appropriate verdict....furthermore; I still view this situation to have been completely avoidable if an underaged, illegally armed teenager had not gone to a protest armed with an extremely dangerous weapon. I would also like to know if this minor had asked his parent's permission to do this ahead of time or if they did not or would not have condoned this act has they known of his intentions. People are you keeping track of what your children are actually doing ?????
might want to re-read or maybe educate yourself on the law. He was not illegally armed and this was already thrown out. Good thing he was armed or he would be dead.
You people must not know about a man in MN. A bunch of punk rich kids kept breaking in to steal his pain meds. The cops refused to do anything. One Thanksgiving, same kids broke in, DEFENDING YOUR HOME FROM HOME INVASION SHOULD BE SELF DEFENSE. That guy is in prison for life for self defense. This kid has less claim to self defense than that man
I live near there. He purposely made it seem like he wasn’t home that night. He waited in the basement for those teens. He shot them both and then executed one as they crawled away. He recorded the whole thing. That’s not self defense at all. He planned to kill them.
@@StubyProductions He planned to protect HIS home from trespassers, sound familiar at all?
One second, I'm baffled! YOU ARE IMPLYING THAT HE TRICKED THE CRIMINAL TEENS INTO BREAKING INTO HIS HOUSE BY PRETENDING NOT TO BE HOME? ARE YOU F***** KIDDING ME? EITHER WAY, ITS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE TO BREAK INTO HIS HOME.
@@StubyProductions He was disabled, had fun, protected his home from home invasion. Kyle wanted to protect his community from criminals, that guy wanted to protect his him from criminals
It's on video my god the evidence tells you all kyle did it self defense but he is also wrong because he killed someone that is a punishment for owning a gun and using it for self defense but yeah that was self defense and the case should have been closed just accused the boy that he killed someone but again that was self defense in his side.
We are allowed by the constitution to own firearms and use them for self defense. You do not know what you ste talking about.
@@mariosangermano5709 Not if ur underage
@@lucasjesus3644 according to the law, you are allowed to use a weapon if you are under 18 years of age. You're not allowed to buy a weapon if you are under 18. And he did not buy the weapon. And it can't be a short barrel rifle, and it wasn't.
Impressive word salad there, Ashley.
INNOCENT!!!
It was kill or be killed and he stud his ground so let the boy go home
A disregard for human life because because he knew fully what are you doing
@@myway2653 True triangular hands means you are innocent
@@myway2653 True rittenhouse did not deserve to die so im glad he didn't
They chased him you idiot. Why would rosenbaum chase him and then reach for his gun, what was kyle supposed to do? Just keep running until what? It must be very easy to be this dumb. Ignorance is bliss i hear.
@@myway2653 They were not protesting. They were attacking Kyle.
Beside protester do not burn loot and destroy property..
And it was not a protest that escalated and got out of hand...they went there with the intentions of destroying property and stealing (looting) anything they could.
Learn the difference between a protest, a riot, and looting
Lol.. the only ppl that had no regard for human life were the ones attacking kyle. The ignorance is shocking.
There has to be some sort of punishment for this kid because if not then it will only empower other vigilante behavior at rally's and protests in the future. Self defense or not, you just don't go out and get involved with this stuff, it really is none of your business to go to another state and walk around with an assault rifle or any firearm for that matter! there will only be trouble to come out of it. Stay home and let the police handle it, you are not a police officer or a trained military person.
On the other hand if your a rioter you shouldn’t attack others and especially if they are armed, if Kyle had been a police officer there would be no case, and I certainly doubt we would have a court case.
Wtf are you talking about.. he showed no vigilante behaviour. Again you are victim blaming.. oh no dont do the right thing.. you are empowering the same rioters that would have taken his life or caused grievous bodily harm.
@@xxxneoxxx Bottom line brother, don't put yourself in the situation in the first place. I don't get why people think that he is totally justified in this whole thing. They did not come to his house looking for trouble, no, he went out of his way ( to another state?) with a f---ing gun, who do you think that you are at this point? a police officer? a special agent? a military specialist? no he is a 17 year old kid who should have been home doing his homework or anything else rather than going there...Bad choices, bad parenting.
@@Rob-vv5yn But he is NOT a police officer..Lol only acting like one.
@@garylivingston9052 you do know american citizens have the right to bare arms no matter what age you are. The constitution 2nd amendment to be exact does not say you have to be a certain age to have a gun. Being in another state is irrelevant the constitution covers all 50 states. Quit with your liberal non sense. These rioters burned and looted all summer while the police stood by and did nothing. The police are a joke in big liberal crappy cities.
What Rosenbaum did was ill advised and reckless. What Huber, Grosskreutz and the other did was heroic. Attempting to stop an active shooter regardless of danger to oneself is heroic. Anthony Huber and Gaige Grosskreutz are heroes.
You are delusional
@@pinheadlarry9495 Rittenhouse didn’t have a license granting him the right to be armed. That precludes literally everything else in the case and the judge dismissed it because the kid was 17. If anyone is delusional it’s the judge who says it’s perfectly reasonable to open carry without a license.
@@radupopescu5379
There is no “license to be armed”, you don’t need a license do your rights.
@@logoseven3365 Yeah, I'm aware of Wisconsin's batshit insane gun laws now. I was wrong
THIS MAN IS GUILTY
I'm not even American but if this guy got charged for defending himself,i would be disgusted in thier system
You better stop seeing your boy friend so much.
He has packed your fudge so often and so hard, that it has replace what few brain cels you had with the brown stuff!
Joshua pull your head out of you hole
Try doing that over, but this time, try making your brain tingle. Paying attention isn’t a bad choice too.
Dislike
From Toronto I viewed all video on live feed of what this man did he is guilty as charged murder intention to commit murder with full intention
Yeah, you definitely sound like someone from Toronto.
Hahaha I'm from Australia....and this guy defended himself,if he didn't he would be dead.its clear as day.
Don’t make us look bad. Alberta knows he’s a great hero! You obviously didn’t understand the videos you watched.
Mr Smith, you really need to start paying attention to Chris Sky!
@@Merit16 I've noticed Americans are split 50/50 on Kyle, but all foreigners say Kyle is innocent XD
Kyle Rittenhouse will go down in history as a folk hero!
GUILTY DAMMIT
Yes you are guilty
Not guilty
NOT GUILTY, justice is served.
Guilty! No reasonable person at 17 years old have a freaking AK! You people are sick
Actually they should for exactly this purpose. Legal self defense from immediate bodily harm or death.
Yeah, great comment, you couldn't have made it more obvious that you have no clue about the circumstances in this case
He didn't have an AK though... you don't know the detail of the trial, do you princess?
Yea, no reasonable person at 17 should burn and loot either!
@@BigR486 nobody died until he got there, therefore everybody was in danger, nobody needed to die