@@ThatCapybara315 I’m no aviation expert, but I imagine the plane is going to crash into something no matter what? Especially with the change in weight and the aerodynamics of the design, it’d probably be so much harder to even control to where it’d be pointless to just die in it. There are pilots who’ve been able to land their aircraft with engine failure or major system malfunctions, but this design would make that basically impossible to even try and attempt. It doesn’t help either that you can’t control the passenger cabin so depending on what you’re flying above and where you drop, it could still be a death sentence even with parachutes. Hell, the cabin could possibly flip in the air before they deploy where the parachutes inevitably could get tangled very fast.
@@MrChicken547FINALLY! FINALLY! FINALLY SOEMONE HAS A BRAIN! Nobody in these videos ever mentions that pilots have they're own parachutes although passengers don't have one pilots do but most of the time pilots carry their own parachutes in these emergencies problem is they have to risk their life for the passengers So if this place becomes a reality then that means the pilots can also exit the plane and parachute out of the plane
Dumb idea for lots of reasons. 1. The common time for accidents is takeoff or landing so no time 2. Aircraft generally don't go down straight and level so no release ability 3. A major failure point as 1 piece airplanes are less likely to break apart than a 2 piece plane.
Gonna be real, this concept likely will not help that much. Most accidents happen during takeoff and landing so there is not enough space to allow for the parachutes to slow down the cabin completely, on top of having so many more possible point of failure
If in the scenario that was given where to happen a few key parts of the plane would need to be engineered in a specific ways like the electronics,fuel and other components would need to be built above the passenger compartment to make it possible to detach the passenger/luggage compartment safely while still allowing the pilots full range of controls they may still need or have. A big downside is now the aircraft is much lighter and the pilots need to calculate the difference between weight to fly properly or have a way to get to the plane to land/evacuate the cockpit after they ditch the passenger compartment. A few big down sides of the design would be what if they are at a steep angle,low to the ground or they mistime the parachutes deploying on the passenger compartment. Would they even know for sure the passenger compartment would even detach or would it jam and possibly cause damage to the aircraft if only one side was activated or both failed to activate at all?
Only those issues? What about weight, structural inegrity, prize, reliability, etc? The problems aren't the pilots, we could just teach them how to parachute and make it a part of training, but it is reallu hard not to say almost impossible (exageration)
yes, but thats for last second stuff, for example the spirit of kansas crash, the pilots ejected as the plane slammed down, the one f35 crash, pilot ejected last second, and many others. Keep in mind the B2 (spirit of kansas) and the f35, those are military aircraft. No way in hell will they permit a commercial plane to have ejection seats.
They should add a spot for captains and pilots so they can manually drop the passenger bay but requires a special key so the pilots can be onboard the pod while the rest of the plane crashes
The pilots have parachutes in the cockpit, they are one of the most prioritized people on the plane. I don’t understand how people think they won’t make it
I assumed that the pilot, co-pilot, and crew would have their own parachutes. Or if the pilot, co-pilot, and crew were to go down with the main cabin then there would be an option for them to make it into the main cabin and get to their reserved seats before it's detached, like a timer or something. But I guess someone might need to steer the plane into a safe area for crash landing first so it doesn't crash into an area with too many civilians or buildings.
Honestly why would airlines design this into their planes? What if the parachutes fail? What if the clamping mechanism fails mid flight? Would the cabin not tumble after detaching? The major point is to save lives but this design concept only prevent the death tolls on a few number of incident types like having an engine failure overseas and not having a place to land. which is already extremely rare and flying on airlines is still way safer than driving.
Unfortunately, in my theory it can only be installed in anhedral planes. If it were to be installed in planes that have dihedral wings, it could be more challenging due to the permanent stability these wings provide, which might conflict with the dynamics of a detached cabin. The upward angle (dihedral) of the wings could interfere with the separation process and the initial descent of the cabin. The concept itself is something I find interesting yet 50/50 not good, it probably has a good likelihood of saving lives only in an anhedral plane. Mostly planes that are anhedral are commonly military planes, such as the Airbus A400M Atlas, the C-5 Super Galaxy, C-17 Globemaster, these planes have an anhedral wing(downward) design. The reason why these planes have the anhedral wing design is to improve maneuverability and roll performance, and to help an aircraft return to its original position after a disturbance. I haven't known and studied such a commercial plane that has anhedral wings. And yes in my guess anhedral commercial planes aren't really that common in aviation.
Well, the pilots could just go into the part with the passengers last second. Just put the plate on auto pilot or something. Either way there would probably be enough time to move to the passenger area.
I would say, an option here might be that pilots learn how to use parachutes before becoming a pilot, so that way the cockpit has 2 parachutes and they can maybe get safe
Instead of putting stuff like that, cause it would cause a lot of accidents including it falling off, plane manufacturers(on smaller planes) should put parachutes on it(like on the Cirrus Vision Jet). Bigger planes are already safe.
It's an interesting idea, but there are some flaws to work out. The biggest of these in my opinion is that detaching that portion in the way depicted at 500 mph will: A) Cause the plane itself to sharply pitch up and smack the cabin with the tail. B) Possibly cause the cabin to cartwheel uncontrollably from aerodynamics. C) The parachutes deploying will either rip the cabin roof off, at least injure everyone from rapid deceleration, or allow propper forward deceleration but fail to get enough vertical deceleration. D) A few floatation devices will not keep the cabin from sinking it water, especially since the slightest wave would break it apart under its own weight anyway.
the pilots get two parachutes and the cabin door can be opened to jump away from the engines. the idea is a the release of the weight of the cabin would give the plane more lift and give the pilots more time to react for themselves.
This probably would work, due to most of the fuselage becoming detached from the wings, which is the heaviest part of the plane. However, the additional weight from the parachutes would increase fuel consumption by a good margin, so it is unlikely this would be universally adopted.
Past:mom i want to be pilot
Now:mom i want to be passenger
mom: womp womp to bad son youll be a pilot if u like it or not
dad: just go in the cabin stupid
Past: mom i want to be a pilot
Now: *mom i want to be a pilot*
Past:mom im a pilot
Now:mom im Napoleon
@@Chilikorvveteran pilot: are these people even speaking english these days....?
The guy in the toilet won’t even know what happened💀
Do you think you can come up with a better idea on how to save passengers in an air emergency?????? I'll wait.
@@GayleClantonRatio
It's a joke @@GayleClanton
The waste will come up.
@@GayleClanton Emergency landings, cockpit resource management, gliding, etc. But none of them go with your rage-bait comment
What? Why wouldn't the pilot & crew. Just evacuate into the detachable passenger cabin.
Because the bigger issue is the plane without a pilot crashing into something
@ThatCapybara315 at that point you can't control it. You'd be too light for how fast you're going.
@@ThatCapybara315 I’m no aviation expert, but I imagine the plane is going to crash into something no matter what?
Especially with the change in weight and the aerodynamics of the design, it’d probably be so much harder to even control to where it’d be pointless to just die in it. There are pilots who’ve been able to land their aircraft with engine failure or major system malfunctions, but this design would make that basically impossible to even try and attempt.
It doesn’t help either that you can’t control the passenger cabin so depending on what you’re flying above and where you drop, it could still be a death sentence even with parachutes. Hell, the cabin could possibly flip in the air before they deploy where the parachutes inevitably could get tangled very fast.
Put some kind of button in the cabin that a random guy can't just run up to and press it (only pilots can)@@ThatCapybara315
So who is gonna press the button For the parachute
Pilots: there’s nothing we can do
There is we can do
The parachute
The detached seat injectors
The, lake
@@MrChicken547FINALLY! FINALLY!
FINALLY SOEMONE HAS A BRAIN!
Nobody in these videos ever mentions that pilots have they're own parachutes although passengers don't have one pilots do but most of the time pilots carry their own parachutes in these emergencies problem is they have to risk their life for the passengers
So if this place becomes a reality then that means the pilots can also exit the plane and parachute out of the plane
@@MrChicken547and you can run to the passenger seat.
Couldn’t this he solved by just having parachutes in the pilot cockpit?
FR
FR
FR
ppl r so unoriginal with the “ FR”
@@scarletoverkilllol8462 FR(?)
Dumb idea for lots of reasons.
1. The common time for accidents is takeoff or landing so no time
2. Aircraft generally don't go down straight and level so no release ability
3. A major failure point as 1 piece airplanes are less likely to break apart than a 2 piece plane.
True.
Also the passenger cabin and all the passengers would have to be really light in order to be held up by 2 parachutes.
So you're telling me that the only time this would be useful is when a plane is in stable flight at a high altitude. Huh seems useless
Also it would intensify the costs and time for maintenance
Plus the aircraft would become incredibly unbalanced
"The customer is always right" ahh plane design 💀
wild
Ahh memers:🤡🤡🤡
@@lifeforever69 bro who still uses the clown emoji on youtube get on tiktok or something
good one
@@lifeforever69 "🤡" 🤡ahh reply.
"you've failed as a pilot. You can consider your job... Forever Grounded."
"The captain always goes down with the ship"
In this case, the pilot goes down with his/her plane
New caption style no way
I like the little emojis he added 😊
@@lopezfan24I think the emojis are automatically generated based on the text topic
Yes way
It's auto caption function on capcut.
@@ZN9_xe yeah isn't it being changed to a capcut pro feature
"Idksterling has new cool subtitle he just doesn't know it yet"
Idksterling talking about memes is a rare sight
The concern I'd have is if there is a issue and the detachable part fell for no reason then the parachute failed
50/50 survival chance at that rate since people have been able to survive
Your English gave spider man cancer lol
Saving millions of dollars, or saving thousands of lives
Truly a hard choice
*STONKS* ):-(
Gonna be real, this concept likely will not help that much. Most accidents happen during takeoff and landing so there is not enough space to allow for the parachutes to slow down the cabin completely, on top of having so many more possible point of failure
just gimmie my money 🤑🤑
I takin the mil ngl
if you save the lives, you save the money
if you dont save the lives, you dont save the money
Bro upgraded his captions to tier 3 💀🙏
So the pilots are pirates (or French)
french*
@@ionaccelerator8033 why thank u ❤️
French pirates
The French person u see is Napoleon he is famous for his words *well there’s noting we can do* in war so it became a meme
@FelixMuoz oh yeah I totally forgot about napoleon lol 😆 😅
Everytime i see these type of videos, i knew that this guy would pop out of no where
THEY LITERALY GOT PARACHUTES!
Step 1:Walk to the passengers seats
Wait... That's kinda smart
If in the scenario that was given where to happen a few key parts of the plane would need to be engineered in a specific ways like the electronics,fuel and other components would need to be built above the passenger compartment to make it possible to detach the passenger/luggage compartment safely while still allowing the pilots full range of controls they may still need or have. A big downside is now the aircraft is much lighter and the pilots need to calculate the difference between weight to fly properly or have a way to get to the plane to land/evacuate the cockpit after they ditch the passenger compartment.
A few big down sides of the design would be what if they are at a steep angle,low to the ground or they mistime the parachutes deploying on the passenger compartment. Would they even know for sure the passenger compartment would even detach or would it jam and possibly cause damage to the aircraft if only one side was activated or both failed to activate at all?
“A captain always goes down with his ship.” - That one captain
Save 100+ passengers while terrorizing a population of 100k+ on the ground. Yeah this is stupid
Being Ukrainian and being named Vladimir is crazy bad luck💀💀💀
Only those issues? What about weight, structural inegrity, prize, reliability, etc? The problems aren't the pilots, we could just teach them how to parachute and make it a part of training, but it is reallu hard not to say almost impossible (exageration)
Bro upgraded the subtitles to max
Pilots could have gotten ejector seats......can't use incomplete ideas
yes, but thats for last second stuff, for example the spirit of kansas crash, the pilots ejected as the plane slammed down, the one f35 crash, pilot ejected last second, and many others.
Keep in mind the B2 (spirit of kansas) and the f35, those are military aircraft. No way in hell will they permit a commercial plane to have ejection seats.
Bro changed up the captions and thought we wouldn’t notice 🤨
Also what about the ocean? Will the passengers be stranded at sea?
Search for EPIRBS and PLBS
No wdym it will have an alarm system an will make emergency rescue team know where they are
yeah, in most aircrashes rhey get in water.
Oh great what about the jets and space shuttle are they saved
@@MrChicken547 depends
Add ejection seats for the pilots also like in fighter jets.
There's nothing they can do
he really increased the video budget
They cooked-
They should add a spot for captains and pilots so they can manually drop the passenger bay but requires a special key so the pilots can be onboard the pod while the rest of the plane crashes
Poor pilots😢 I fell bad
A true pilot always goes down with it's ships. Respect
Ships? Are you slow bro 😭
The pilots have parachutes in the cockpit, they are one of the most prioritized people on the plane. I don’t understand how people think they won’t make it
The pilots took *what about me?* too seriously
Why cant they just walk to the passenger cabin from the cockpit?
I assumed that the pilot, co-pilot, and crew would have their own parachutes. Or if the pilot, co-pilot, and crew were to go down with the main cabin then there would be an option for them to make it into the main cabin and get to their reserved seats before it's detached, like a timer or something. But I guess someone might need to steer the plane into a safe area for crash landing first so it doesn't crash into an area with too many civilians or buildings.
“go on without me” aah😭💀🙏
This is why the pilots always bring a parhchute
Give pilots parachutes
Don't worry the pilots have parachutes
The pilots can also go into the cabin just before its jettisoned !
(with jettison switch to be in cabin, obviously !)
everyone ganstas until the detachment mechanism fails
"There's nothing we can do" ahh moment
Honestly why would airlines design this into their planes? What if the parachutes fail? What if the clamping mechanism fails mid flight? Would the cabin not tumble after detaching?
The major point is to save lives but this design concept only prevent the death tolls on a few number of incident types like having an engine failure overseas and not having a place to land. which is already extremely rare and flying on airlines is still way safer than driving.
It's also possible that there is an extra seat for the pilots in the cabin and no one would care about the cockpit part again in an emergency
There was one guys seat bro💀
In the consept video you can also see the cockpit crashing in the background
Pilots: this is why I need a raise.
Plot twist: the pilots have emergency parachutes
the pilots be like: toma letsetudiva shomen donetsu
The Pilot always goes down with his plane
They literally messed up this slideshow with this song. (Instead of Amour Plastique.)
A captain always goes down with his ship
Idea: Add a timer. Not long, like a 10-20 sec timer. Just long enough so that the pilots can escape to the cabin.
Unfortunately, in my theory it can only be installed in anhedral planes. If it were to be installed in planes that have dihedral wings, it could be more challenging due to the permanent stability these wings provide, which might conflict with the dynamics of a detached cabin. The upward angle (dihedral) of the wings could interfere with the separation process and the initial descent of the cabin.
The concept itself is something I find interesting yet 50/50 not good, it probably has a good likelihood of saving lives only in an anhedral plane.
Mostly planes that are anhedral are commonly military planes, such as the Airbus A400M Atlas, the C-5 Super Galaxy, C-17 Globemaster, these planes have an anhedral wing(downward) design.
The reason why these planes have the anhedral wing design is to improve maneuverability and roll performance, and to help an aircraft return to its original position after a disturbance.
I haven't known and studied such a commercial plane that has anhedral wings.
And yes in my guess anhedral commercial planes aren't really that common in aviation.
The people in first row: hey guys you got water up there im thirsty
the design actually works with a lever at the back of the plane that only the pilots can access wich means if they aren't in the cockpit they wont die
the pilots can just go in the passenger cabin ...?
guys if you know the old saying "the captain goes down with the ship" it also applies to aircraft as well
The plane would straight nosedive after that detachment💀💀💀
Imagine if the pilots wouldn't let the cabin detach like "Nah, we ain't dyin' alone. Y'all goin' wit us."
the captain goes down with the ship
The pilots are gonna be strapped to the very back of the plane if this were to happen 😭
This is when self driving planes come in
Pilots when there are 2 water buckets beside them💀
why cant you just keep the cabin and the back connected and add parachutes so the pilot and passengers can be safe
Well, the pilots could just go into the part with the passengers last second. Just put the plate on auto pilot or something. Either way there would probably be enough time to move to the passenger area.
I would say, an option here might be that pilots learn how to use parachutes before becoming a pilot, so that way the cockpit has 2 parachutes and they can maybe get safe
Here’s a fun way to remove this issue when the pilot presses the button there should be a 60s timer soo they get to the back
Plot twist :"the detachable part lands straight into a volcano"
Just Give The Pilots Parachutes
Like, Are Ya'll Dumb?🤦♂️
This lowk reminds me of the saying; “a pirate always goes down with his ship”
The engineers should make an ejection capsule like the F-111
Instead of putting stuff like that, cause it would cause a lot of accidents including it falling off, plane manufacturers(on smaller planes) should put parachutes on it(like on the Cirrus Vision Jet). Bigger planes are already safe.
Its probably a emergency button inside the cabban when the pilot gets back there. and its only a button the pilot can press
It's an interesting idea, but there are some flaws to work out. The biggest of these in my opinion is that detaching that portion in the way depicted at 500 mph will:
A) Cause the plane itself to sharply pitch up and smack the cabin with the tail.
B) Possibly cause the cabin to cartwheel uncontrollably from aerodynamics.
C) The parachutes deploying will either rip the cabin roof off, at least injure everyone from rapid deceleration, or allow propper forward deceleration but fail to get enough vertical deceleration.
D) A few floatation devices will not keep the cabin from sinking it water, especially since the slightest wave would break it apart under its own weight anyway.
the pilots get two parachutes and the cabin door can be opened to jump away from the engines. the idea is a the release of the weight of the cabin would give the plane more lift and give the pilots more time to react for themselves.
“The pilot always goes down with his plane.”
“pilots simply walks to the back”
The pilots have eject seats with parachutes
The 2 parachutes in the cockpit:🗿🥱
I like how he made the captions animated
Easy parachutes in the cockpit
I guess the phrase "a captain goes down with his ship" now applies to the skies aswell.
That one seat: their is nothing I can do
Solution: just make it so that both pilots need to press a button to detact the passenger area, so that way they can survive with the passengers too
This man has new captions he just doesn’t know it yet
Pilots be like
" if i die ,EVERYBODY DIES" 💀
Nahh he upgraded his captions
That one seat : theres nothing we can do
The people in first class 🌕✋
Bro, I feel like this is going to cause more aviation accidents😂
Why can’t the pilot just walk to the passengers and survive as well?
Not to mention the conter of gravity would be thrown off making it impossible for the pilots to control the aircraft
"a captain goes down with his ship"
They took captain going down with his ship too seriously
This probably would work, due to most of the fuselage becoming detached from the wings, which is the heaviest part of the plane. However, the additional weight from the parachutes would increase fuel consumption by a good margin, so it is unlikely this would be universally adopted.