This is laughable. Having seen multiple videos on this channel with countless struggles in his builds, one can only conclude the variable to this channels problems is self-induced. Many have commented valid suggestions and they keep disregarding with arrogance..... good luck on youtube fellow shooter
@Forumrida38621 nothing wrong with that. I never understood the thought behind having a nice thick barrel and chopping it down to 1/2 x 28 or 5/8 x28 doesn't make sense. Yes I understand the standard sizes.
Who makes the most accurate AR-10 barrels? Or at least a good direction. Plus a good way to calculate twist rate. I had an m110 on my AR-10 308 and got a faction promise after the rifling went out. The best I can get that is 0.788 which we both know for an accurate barrel that's s***
lol so funny this guy. trying to convince people brakes and tuners are less accurate is funny. management control is a huge difference. everything contributes to accuracy good luck with this. also Ar-s are suppression fire. apples to oranges vs a bolt gun
If having things on the end of a barrel reduced accuracy would we not be seeing most competitive shooters running barrels without brakes or tuners? It seems to me that in a competitive setting where every advantage you can give yourself is sought after they wouldn't be running these things if accuracy was reduced.
@@quarterminutemagnums That's because most bench rest shooters tune their loads on the spot at the match. Go to an F-Class match were the ammo is preloaded and 99% use tuners.
This is laughable. Having seen multiple videos on this channel with countless struggles in his builds, one can only conclude the variable to this channels problems is self-induced. Many have commented valid suggestions and they keep disregarding with arrogance..... good luck on youtube fellow shooter
@@EagleEyeShooting if I was building a new rifle, I would definitely choose QMM to build it vs eagle eye shooting! This is the second person I've seen you bad mouth. Erik Cortina is the other!
I don't think your assumption that BR shooters don't use muzzle breaks is because they affect accuracy negatively. I think you'll find that muzzle breaks are not allowed to be used because they negatively effect the shooter next to them. The same applies to F Class shooters. Many F Class & BR shooters use tuners though so, I'm not sure what you've seen at matches. Although most use tuners, I don't believe that the tuners are effective because of the tuning aspect, it's much more to do with the addition of mass on the muzzle. It' makes sense really that an effective mass at the muzzle must dampen any movement by decreasing the frequency which reduces the amplitude within the same time period. Although to date, I've yet to see any serious scientific data on the phenomenon, there are so many thousands of anecdotal claims over many decades that, I concede that it must be factual.
Dear Sir - if you build 100 rifles with brakes and 100 without brakes, the 100 without will shoot better on average - but there will be exceptions in both groups. Thanks.................
@@quarterminutemagnums Muzzle breaks are used quite universally it appears, with PRS shooters who typically want to reduce rifle movement to spot the hits or the misses. I've not heard any complaints concerning accuracy so, I'm somewhat perplexed as this is the 1st time I've heard that breaks affect accuracy negatively. There was one break manufacturer I recall who maintained that a certain minimum diameter was necessary to reduce what he theorized was bullet upset from the bow wave or shock wave around the bullet as it passed through the break so, he recommended the next calibre size up from the calibre being used. Just recently, some guys who do very high speed footage did an episode on muzzle breaks filming bullets as they passed through the breaks. It was very interesting & the footage shows very clearly the gas being vented away from the bullet, allowing it virtually unhindered progress away from the muzzle. By contrast, they also filmed the same footage without muzzle breaks & the difference is quite profound whereby, in some instances, the bullet can be seen to be shunted & upset by the raging gases overtaking the bullet from behind. It did indeed appear that muzzle breaks do offer a far more steady & settled exit from the barrel & I have to say that after seeing that footage, I can't imagine that a break would negatively effect the bullet launching process. The channel was called Ballistic High-Speed & it is well worth watching.
This is laughable. Having seen multiple videos on this channel with countless struggles in his builds, one can only conclude the variable to this channels problems is self-induced. Many have commented valid suggestions and they keep disregarding with arrogance..... good luck on youtube fellow shooter
Just a different standard............
Ordered that book, wow the info it explains is amazing. What are other books you recommend?
Love these videos
Dear Sir - see our "book" videos.........thanks.
No Brake for me.
Powder River let her Buck.
On my elr gun, I wish I would have used a 1"×20 instead of the 7/8×20 muzzle!
I always go 3/4x24 thread on my muzzle device barrels. 5/8x28 is too small for 30 cal.
I did 3/4x24 on my 22bra lol
@Forumrida38621 nothing wrong with that. I never understood the thought behind having a nice thick barrel and chopping it down to 1/2 x 28 or 5/8 x28 doesn't make sense. Yes I understand the standard sizes.
Who makes the most accurate AR-10 barrels? Or at least a good direction. Plus a good way to calculate twist rate. I had an m110 on my AR-10 308 and got a faction promise after the rifling went out. The best I can get that is 0.788 which we both know for an accurate barrel that's s***
Try Krieger....................thanks.
@@quarterminutemagnums funny you say that that's what I had. Haven't been able to find one for 3 years
What model Grizzly lathe are you using and do you use a spider on the back to hold the barrel?
It's the profishinal one and I have an assortment of hybrid Tarantulas for work holding...............thanks
lol so funny this guy. trying to convince people brakes and tuners are less accurate is funny. management control is a huge difference. everything contributes to accuracy
good luck with this. also Ar-s are suppression fire. apples to oranges vs a bolt gun
What's the main purpose/use of the gun?
Long range, rabid Koala bears................thanks.
If having things on the end of a barrel reduced accuracy would we not be seeing most competitive shooters running barrels without brakes or tuners? It seems to me that in a competitive setting where every advantage you can give yourself is sought after they wouldn't be running these things if accuracy was reduced.
Dear Sir - go to a bench-rest match..........thanks.
@@quarterminutemagnums That's because most bench rest shooters tune their loads on the spot at the match. Go to an F-Class match were the ammo is preloaded and 99% use tuners.
F-Class has nothing to do with accuracy..................get the Prozac.@@rustynut1967
This is laughable. Having seen multiple videos on this channel with countless struggles in his builds, one can only conclude the variable to this channels problems is self-induced. Many have commented valid suggestions and they keep disregarding with arrogance..... good luck on youtube fellow shooter
@@EagleEyeShooting if I was building a new rifle, I would definitely choose QMM to build it vs eagle eye shooting! This is the second person I've seen you bad mouth. Erik Cortina is the other!
Do you shoot PRS? You need to see your trace to make correction...
You mean Golf with guns?
Robert Whitley is his name.
Dear Sir - thank you! China v---s fried my memory. Appreciated.
I don't think your assumption that BR shooters don't use muzzle breaks is because they affect accuracy negatively. I think you'll find that muzzle breaks are not allowed to be used because they negatively effect the shooter next to them. The same applies to F Class shooters.
Many F Class & BR shooters use tuners though so, I'm not sure what you've seen at matches. Although most use tuners, I don't believe that the tuners are effective because of the tuning aspect, it's much more to do with the addition of mass on the muzzle. It' makes sense really that an effective mass at the muzzle must dampen any movement by decreasing the frequency which reduces the amplitude within the same time period. Although to date, I've yet to see any serious scientific data on the phenomenon, there are so many thousands of anecdotal claims over many decades that, I concede that it must be factual.
Dear Sir - if you build 100 rifles with brakes and 100 without brakes, the 100 without will shoot better on average - but there will be exceptions in both groups. Thanks.................
@@quarterminutemagnums Muzzle breaks are used quite universally it appears, with PRS shooters who typically want to reduce rifle movement to spot the hits or the misses. I've not heard any complaints concerning accuracy so, I'm somewhat perplexed as this is the 1st time I've heard that breaks affect accuracy negatively.
There was one break manufacturer I recall who maintained that a certain minimum diameter was necessary to reduce what he theorized was bullet upset from the bow wave or shock wave around the bullet as it passed through the break so, he recommended the next calibre size up from the calibre being used.
Just recently, some guys who do very high speed footage did an episode on muzzle breaks filming bullets as they passed through the breaks. It was very interesting & the footage shows very clearly the gas being vented away from the bullet, allowing it virtually unhindered progress away from the muzzle. By contrast, they also filmed the same footage without muzzle breaks & the difference is quite profound whereby, in some instances, the bullet can be seen to be shunted & upset by the raging gases overtaking the bullet from behind.
It did indeed appear that muzzle breaks do offer a far more steady & settled exit from the barrel & I have to say that after seeing that footage, I can't imagine that a break would negatively effect the bullet launching process.
The channel was called Ballistic High-Speed & it is well worth watching.
No Brake for me.
Powder River let her Buck.