NATO is a criminal organization created by Americans so that can spread their politics and terror against anybody who oppose them. European countries should look after the interest of its own people and children, not the geopolitical ambition of the USA. Politicians that had betrayed their own countries should be removed, forcefully if needed.
😂😂 glad to see people understand the reason for all these bullshit. I want to see what happen if Russia or China tries to make bases near Hawaii or in Cuba, oh wait… we know what happen
Aren't they? Edit 9 months later: People here in the comment reply watch too much Russian propaganda. If you think that Russia is winning, a superpower that attacks a country much smaller than itself, and had much less military capability that is holding them off for over 2 years now, I consider it a failure. And the fact that the average person in Russia is much worse off today than before the war tells you all about the situation. The world isn’t a better place. No matter the outcome of this war, Russians and Ukrainians will still suffer the consequences much longer than the war itself.
@@qf8898i consider stopping Russia from taking the capital and pushing them back to only the Eastern part near the Russian boarder and totally embarrassing them winning for a much smaller nation.
@@TheRealAb216 are you stupid. When the Russians sing a peace deal with Ukraine by turck and other. They were already in the capital. So after the peace deal Russia take it's troops. Then Ukraine stab the back of Russia by not doing their part of the deal 🙂
@@qf8898I consider stopping enemy 3-4 times larger than yours in army size, weapons and economy, all while that enemy is deploying terrorist acts. Destroying civilian homes, killing and torturing people, destroying electricity centers and causing one of the biggest natural disasters in human history a WIN. Yes. AND not only stopping but going on the offensive, while russia is destroying itself :)
@@TheRealAb216They didn't tho. Putin agreed to leave Kyiv because Zelensky said that no peace talks would begin until russian forces left the capital. Zelensky fucking lied and started conscriptions.
Пупкін про це щороку говорить, що наступна буде Польща і країни Балтії, чому він не говорить про Молдову? Бо її захоплення це 1 день і без особливих зусиль. Доречі пупкін ще говорив, що не вторгнеться в Україну але ми усі знаємо чим це закінчилося
Russia has a 500 year history of attacking its western neighbors. Putin said the downfall of the USSR aka their colonial empire in Eastern europe was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century. The goal is clear. He just lacks the military to take Ukraine let alone the rest of the former USSR.
It’s not since Putin is a chauvinistic, imperialist dictator having continuous internal affairs problem. War is his only way to keep himself in the Russian president’s seat.
The fact that people seriously think Russia would even consider the possibility of invading any of the Baltic states or Poland pre or post Ukraine war, no matter the state of their military, which would start a war with NATO, just shows how deep the propaganda runs in the west, and you can't change my mind about it.
This is not western propaganda. Just anti-russian. I've never heard any politician or media news site claim that Russia will attack any of these nations.
@@LazyLifeIFreak ah another stupid person it seems. Go watch real news and use your brain. Second strongest country is going to lose. That reality not an anime
Ukrainian propaganda. A k a the people who want to make it seem more than just two oligarchy regimes brawling. Just google PR army, prolly will be a first link.
I saw a Latvian online trying to argue that they’re gonna be invaded by Russia next and that Russians are way more privileged than Latvians and nothing I said would convince him otherwise
the worst thing is that the Baltic countries are smaller and have a weaker army than the Ukrainian one. if there is such a massive attack as in the battle for Kyiv, any of the Baltic countries will be destroyed faster than NATO can react. more interesting. will NATO launch an attack on Russia or will it still be resigned. looking at how long NATO is reacting and what discussions are going on, for me this issue is debatable.
@@censord6960 I'd say smaller and weaker on paper. Ukraine is a massive country so of course they'll also hav a much stronger and larger army relatively to defend such a large area. Add that to the fact that Ukraine was caught off guard and struggled to quickly mobilize and get their forces in position they've done decently enough holding off the Russians. The Baltic countries should be able to dig in and hold the Russians off since they'll be on higher alert and have more time to dig in. The smaller size of the country should make it easier to concentrate their defense and bottleneck a Russian offensive. Given the fact that they're actually in NATO means they probably had NATO training and definitely have advanced weapons.
@@1ProAssassin Well, the question here is not that the Baltic countries are weak, but how NATO will react. And in general, it is worth considering that the Russian army is really very powerful and colossal. Their tactic is to literally overwhelm with numbers. Unfortunately, it will be very difficult for the little countries to resist Russia. The Finns and Ukrainians can fight back only because they have a field for maneuver and they hit the weak points of the Russian army (logistics) in mobile groups. They attack and immediately redeploy. Against Russia, you need to have room for maneuver, otherwise this colossus will simply crush you.
@@elirej7201 the point is the West need to shut up and stop pretending to be morally high, they committed much more war crimes than Russia even in recent 25 years
Not exactly true. French corporations continue to exploit ex-colonies by taking their resources. This is what is referred to as neo-colonialism So France very much still has a presence and interest in Africa
@@Interestinguiniyyah the real neo-colonial power in Africa is now China. And France is doing Africa a favor by letting half the continent's people into France.
You wrong ,,because America's media Web,, lies,,,,how many countries are invaded by USA,,,,a Rusia is just good for blame and cover up of America's appetite,,to rule the world 🌎,
We must remain in fear and under Western hegemony: “If Ukraine falls, it will be a catastrophe for the West; it will be the end of Western hegemony” Boris Johnson.
But violence has always been acceptable ways of carrying out foreign policy for the west. Remember Syria, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Pakistan, Vietnam... It's only surprising when other countries use violence to achieve their goals
Honestly you remain ignorant on how the actual populace reacted to these. Vietnam was famously controversial due to it being the first time you could watch war live. And it's quite famous over here in the U.S how stupid we were.
@@simpleviewer1334 unfortunately, Vietnam didn't prevent Iraq and Afghanistan, both countries that did absolutely nothing to the US. Osama lived in Pakistan, not Afghanistan. You destroyed the wrong -stan.
@@simpleviewer1334it’s only stupid according to perspective the people who wanted it to happen were well pleased USA is an empire and empires must expand influence or they die. Unlike Russia USA would be strangled if sanctioned half the world because multinational Plutarchs have shut down our industrial might and ability to self sustain
@@FodaseNaoLigodont make me laugh, baltics and Poland are from nato, if they are attacked it will trigger the article 5, which means all nato members get involved, which will eventually lead to a world war or worse, a nuclear war and fallout and famine across the globe. Now it isn't a political problem, but a humanitarian. No one wins.
Reemergence of "violent force to solve international relations". Russia is not the only country doing this, USA and Other countries have done the same for 50 years
@@vanmiddletonphotography tell me what help did we get? Bro im from Russia, I read everyday about special war operation. Even president of China said that he is neutral but If USA will send ukraine military they will help. NORTH KOREA AND IRAN? BRO HOOOW DID THEY HELP? 😔that's sad that all western want to do all of you versus Russia
Stupid take, no one winning, both countries basically destroyed. Russia might be bigger but it's much more vulnerable because it's consists of many different people and borders a lot of other countries. It's big but fragile.
@@lustip8194 exactly, Why did America even try to establish democracy there, knowing that the population would resist, and if they didn’t know the population would resist, why did they continue to try by force when they had already started? This isn't source of stability
"Violente force could reemerge as means of carrying out international relation", in the meantime US invaded Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, NATO bombed Serbia and break away Kosovo, bombed Lybia and killed its leader, threatened and attacked Nord Stream 1,stopped the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, refused to discuss Russia security guarantees. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. You meant "Violente force could reemerge as means to oppose US hegemony"
Well the US does everything for the better. All these counties you are talking about are authoritarian countries that the west wants to overthrow and liberate. Liberation is a good thing
So NATOz presence closer to Russia isn't a problem but Russias prese ce closer to NATO, if you can hear yourself, who has moved closer to the other of the 2?.
NATO is a defensive organisation countries are free to join Russia is a country the only way for it to grow is to conquer I guess your comment just justifies why Russia neighbour want to join NATO yes they don't want Russia to expand into their countries! Are u mad that they want to defend themselves?
Фінляндія яка до 22 року навіть не думала вступати в НАТО але геніальний стратег Пупкін все передбачив 😂😂😂 але ж це інше ) там кордон не менше ніж в Україні з оркостаном 😂
Funny how nato "moving" involves countries independently applying to join, whereas Russia "moving" involves illegally invading. I wonder why countries bordering russia are applying to join nato? It's like breaking into a neighbour's house to stop them joining the neighbourhood watch, then blaming the neighbourhood watch "expansion"
@@danilastepanovmyes everybody wants that nobody wants negative iq influence look what you did to ur country filled it with illegal migrants that have more rights than its citizens 😂😂
You do realize the Soviet Union is dissolved, right? The only part of Russia that still resembles it is the corrupt officials and the mistreatment of its people.
"Violent force could reemerge as a means to carry out international relations". It has always been the case. You were just lucky to live away from the hotspots
If anyone has not yet understood the reasons for the start of the conflict, open the OSCE website and read the reports starting from February 10, 2022, but not the title page of the report, but the full version with a map!
@@ChristianMapperReal If you call obliterating 80% of the army, destroying 50% of its economy while growing its own, annexing all the territories it wanted and entirely meeting their objectives a stalemate, so be it.
@@ChristianMapperReal Russia with their own weapons, not very technologized and old vs a NATO-supplied country with the newest weapons and military technologies Think again… the ukrainians are struggling *AF* with all of their new weapons.. and nato- trained volunteers
@@ExceedtherealmAccording to Russia about 500% of Ukrainian armored vehicles have been destroyed, counting those supported by the west as an aid in the defensive war, so I don't know what the Russian army is fighting right now.
Zelensky making wrong decisions and making others pay for it. This is what happens when ego becomes bigger than your people's well being and you start going into war with more powerful countries instead of de escalating the situation.
@@КатеринаР-м7ккрым, потому что там был флот, всю остальную территорию, только для того, что бы был наземный способ к нему попасть. Вся остальная Украина уже поделена между америкосами и европейцами и нахер не нужна. Спросите, захера украинцы с Александром Соросом договорились 400 квадратных км под химические отходы западных компаний отдать? И почему французов это волнует больше, чем жителей Украины? Или у вас в рукаве туз, в виде Китайцев, которым арендовали землю на 50 лет под выращивание помидоров в России. Пример крайне нерелевантный, кстати говоря.
@@КатеринаР-м7кв качестве демонстрации что надо было соглашаться на переговоры и в качестве сухопутного коридора в крым но если ты мыслишь только шаблоном зачем и как посмели? то ты не поймешь
The iron curtain was dismantled on the Russian side, the Warshaw pact was dissolved and Russia allowed Germany to reunite. It was NATO that refused to dissolve and decided to expand. NATO created the instability. The new iron curtain is a NATO curtain.
@@Kyle_Broflowski1997well they shouldn’t have set a self fulfilling prophecy by striving into nato. Russia released them and trusted them but that only works both ways. If all tvose ex soviet countries dont trust russia there is no reason for russia to trust them
@@fk4410 russia basically colonised those countries and held them against their will, and when their empire collapsed they broke free, and obviously, seeked protection from the countries that, you know, *weren't occupying them for the last 50 years* . Russia just cant handle the fact that their former colonies dont want to be under their boot anymore
@@fk4410What trust are speaking about ? When your neighbour is a militaristic dictatorship, how can you trust him, especially when he has such a background !?
@@hakuto6814 Imagine being so deluded that you think that Russians occupying a big chunk of your land but making very slow progress is a victory for you 😂
The violence started by east Ukraine against East Ukraine in 2014, with the support of the US. This is well documented, including in the western press. Remember, some of us can remember more than a couple of weeks back in time... The war is now in its 10th year.
Everyone knows the war in the Donbass started in 2014 but your memory can't be that good if you think that's how it started. Violence in East Ukraine started when Russian separatists stormed Ukrainian government buildings in Luhansk and Donetsk in early April and threatened an insurgency. The Ukrainian government then sent in forces to combat those who had forcibly and illegally taken control of public office. The US had no involvement in that. That's when the violence started in eastern Ukraine. In the year before the 2022 invasion of Ukraine by Russia, there were 25 deaths (half from unexplored mines). The violence was diminishing with every passing year and was localised at this point in the war. Then we got to February 2022. Since then at least 3 times as many civilians have died than the 8 previous years. All Ukrainian. 8 times as many soldiers killed on both sides in one year compared to 8 previous years. So when people say the war started then, it's because the level of violence and life lost compared to previous years is many, many times higher.
I think, today, the war in Ukraine has reached the point where the West and the rest of the free world can not, should not, will not allow Ukraine to fail.
I love when people say "free world." You mean the fading former colonial powers who don't' really give a rat's ass about freedom, other than their freedom to continue to impose their will upon everyone else.
Ukraine will become a landlocked country, and this in itself will bring an end to the United terrorist states of americas murdering and thieving around the world, and not before time.
@@poppi510 in ukraine is if not the biggest 1 of the biggest in the world agricaltural land for bread weed production in zaparozetsk is the biggest nuclear electric station in europe to product electricity i am saying only 2 things and they are much more. and ALL THOSE were created from russians in the 70 years of USSR time and you believe Russians are going to give ALL THOSE to west becose of zele?? we see ukraine as country was NEVER EXISTED stalin made ukraine as soviet republic for more then 1000 years was Russia and it is ukrainian language it does not existe is russian language with polish idioms and they speak ( they know ) only 20% in west ukraine more then the half total population of ukraine are russians JUST EXACTLY how they are in the rest of Russia they still ONLY 2 choices for the west 1 THEY FORGET ( ukraine ) 2 third world thermonuclear war and the end of humanity. NO OTHER CHOICE the dilemma is their's
perhaps in your dreams 😂 putin said himself he is well aware that usa has much higher spending in military than russia. if usa really wants to win this war, they could.
@@vegpvegsn6934 since then until this day many many billions of dollars have been spent in military. There is no comparison. We have 2024 if you didnt know yet, wake up!
"Given the Rus military perfomance in ukraine"? 😂 Russia has been slaughtering an army of total 800tsnd to 1million soldiers with weapons from over 30 nations. That means that ukr has been natos biggest army and they are about to go down.
Always makes me laugh when main stream media accuse Russia of using propaganda and then go on to use the argument “Russia might keep going and take over all of Europe”. Nice piece of propaganda right there.
Як мінімум Блядімір Пупкін щороку сам особисто говорить , що його мрія це відновити СССР а хто перший в черзі? Правильно, Україна а лише потім усі інші.
They should have invited russia into nato. China would be checkmate. Instead is it was very important to only have super political correct countries like turkey hungary poland israel saudi arabia as allies lol
![Quando Rondo - Grow Up [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8zFnCg3BO4Q/mqdefault.jpg)
Full video: How does the War in Ukraine end?
ruclips.net/video/XTL1crsWM6A/видео.html
NATO is a criminal organization created by Americans so that can spread their politics and terror against anybody who oppose them.
European countries should look after the interest of its own people and children, not the geopolitical ambition of the USA. Politicians that had betrayed their own countries should be removed, forcefully if needed.
By William Blum
Instances of the United States overthrowing, or attempting to overthrow, a foreign government since the Second World War.
(* indicates successful ouster of a government)
China 1949 to early 1960s
Albania 1949-53
East Germany 1950s
Iran 1953 *
Guatemala 1954 *
Costa Rica mid-1950s
Syria 1956-7
Egypt 1957
Indonesia 1957-8
British Guiana 1953-64 *
Iraq 1963 *
North Vietnam 1945-73
Cambodia 1955-70 *
Laos 1958 *, 1959 *, 1960 *
Ecuador 1960-63 *
Congo 1960 *
France 1965
Brazil 1962-64 *
Dominican Republic 1963 *
Cuba 1959 to present
Bolivia 1964 *
Indonesia 1965 *
Ghana 1966 *
Chile 1964-73 *
Greece 1967 *
Costa Rica 1970-71
Bolivia 1971 *
Australia 1973-75 *
Angola 1975, 1980s
Zaire 1975
Portugal 1974-76 *
Jamaica 1976-80 *
Seychelles 1979-81
Chad 1981-82 *
Grenada 1983 *
South Yemen 1982-84
Suriname 1982-84
Fiji 1987 *
Libya 1980s
Nicaragua 1981-90 *
Panama 1989 *
Bulgaria 1990 *
Albania 1991 *
Iraq 1991
Afghanistan 1980s *
Somalia 1993
Yugoslavia 1999-2000 *
Ecuador 2000 *
Afghanistan 2001 *
Venezuela 2002 *
Iraq 2003 *
Haiti 2004 *
Somalia 2007 to present
Honduras 2009 *
Libya 2011 *
Syria 2012
Ukraine 2014 *
Cool
Propaganda video*
It's not unlikely. Russia would conscript every man in Ukraine to go fight in the baltics
McDonald's analysis...
McDonalds comment
@@gamesisfunny wait, wait...
Stanly Stanly has a point
True
Of course is a dumb American who made this video so of course is the Macdonalds analysis brainwashed and full of propaganda
Hey. That the high school for America of course it has meaning 💀
What a Hollywood narrative
@@ytmm1 1) Putin is not a dumb4§§
2) it's unrealistically fake
3) Putin only wants Donbass as the fact they WANT to be part of Russia
Didn’t y’all say this was gonna be over in a week/month/6 months/year/…
@@jesusofbullets the West said all that, not a single Russian official
No. It’s actually the narrative of RT.
@@ericchase5045it's is the narrative of the UK. Russia is in it for long haul.
why did Russians put their country so close to US military base ?
Which is basically anywhere
Shame on those russians for having people and country
@@bugz7149 why does people have life just give all their land/resources to Americans
😂😂 glad to see people understand the reason for all these bullshit. I want to see what happen if Russia or China tries to make bases near Hawaii or in Cuba, oh wait… we know what happen
@@VonEldrichyou obviously didn’t see the cuban missile crisis then
Russia basically built those military bases by being evil
What your drunk uncle tells you at that BBQ party
Damn Skippy 😊👍
Best comment ever 😂😂😂😂
After this he'll move on to how he was abducted by Aliens back in the 70s.
Damnit 😂😂😂
You cracked me up 😅
Bro talking like Ukraine is winning 💀
Aren't they? Edit 9 months later: People here in the comment reply watch too much Russian propaganda. If you think that Russia is winning, a superpower that attacks a country much smaller than itself, and had much less military capability that is holding them off for over 2 years now, I consider it a failure. And the fact that the average person in Russia is much worse off today than before the war tells you all about the situation. The world isn’t a better place. No matter the outcome of this war, Russians and Ukrainians will still suffer the consequences much longer than the war itself.
@@qf8898i consider stopping Russia from taking the capital and pushing them back to only the Eastern part near the Russian boarder and totally embarrassing them winning for a much smaller nation.
@@TheRealAb216 are you stupid. When the Russians sing a peace deal with Ukraine by turck and other. They were already in the capital. So after the peace deal Russia take it's troops. Then Ukraine stab the back of Russia by not doing their part of the deal 🙂
@@qf8898I consider stopping enemy 3-4 times larger than yours in army size, weapons and economy, all while that enemy is deploying terrorist acts. Destroying civilian homes, killing and torturing people, destroying electricity centers and causing one of the biggest natural disasters in human history a WIN. Yes.
AND not only stopping but going on the offensive, while russia is destroying itself :)
@@TheRealAb216They didn't tho. Putin agreed to leave Kyiv because Zelensky said that no peace talks would begin until russian forces left the capital. Zelensky fucking lied and started conscriptions.
Thinking that Russia will invade Poland is just ridiculous,
Пупкін про це щороку говорить, що наступна буде Польща і країни Балтії, чому він не говорить про Молдову? Бо її захоплення це 1 день і без особливих зусиль. Доречі пупкін ще говорив, що не вторгнеться в Україну але ми усі знаємо чим це закінчилося
@@hakuto6814you dont know what ur talking about
俄罗斯现在不敢了，现在开始四处乞讨了，但是除了几个流氓国家没有人搭理他
Russia has a 500 year history of attacking its western neighbors. Putin said the downfall of the USSR aka their colonial empire in Eastern europe was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century. The goal is clear. He just lacks the military to take Ukraine let alone the rest of the former USSR.
It’s not since Putin is a chauvinistic, imperialist dictator having continuous internal affairs problem. War is his only way to keep himself in the Russian president’s seat.
The fact that people seriously think Russia would even consider the possibility of invading any of the Baltic states or Poland pre or post Ukraine war, no matter the state of their military, which would start a war with NATO, just shows how deep the propaganda runs in the west, and you can't change my mind about it.
A Z goober speaking some sense? I had no idea you guys have actual brains. Good one! 👏
Well of course a direct war is impossible to happen because they use other countries like Ukraine to do the work.
This is not western propaganda. Just anti-russian. I've never heard any politician or media news site claim that Russia will attack any of these nations.
@@LazyLifeIFreak ah another stupid person it seems. Go watch real news and use your brain. Second strongest country is going to lose. That reality not an anime
@@LazyLifeIFreak pentagon leaks says others you overdosed on western propaganda
Russia obviously wont invade poland or the baltics who is saying that lol
Ukrainian propaganda.
A k a the people who want to make it seem more than just two oligarchy regimes brawling. Just google PR army, prolly will be a first link.
Русские то же самое говорили и про Украину
@@КатеринаР-м7кщому ти пишеш це на російської? Я русский, и вам всем копзда
Anyone who knows Russia?
You're probably from the USA, France or Germany and you don't know what Russia is...
@@azazeldemon7779 russia cant win a war against nato putin isnt stupid
Then no more Coca Cola for you 😂
Извините за разочарование. Но она тут всë ещë есть в достаточном количестве, и с приемлемой ценой.
Ah, the baltic countries which are in Nato 🤣🤣
Funding rebellions in the nation could work as its not a direct attack from Russia
I saw a Latvian online trying to argue that they’re gonna be invaded by Russia next and that Russians are way more privileged than Latvians and nothing I said would convince him otherwise
the worst thing is that the Baltic countries are smaller and have a weaker army than the Ukrainian one. if there is such a massive attack as in the battle for Kyiv, any of the Baltic countries will be destroyed faster than NATO can react. more interesting. will NATO launch an attack on Russia or will it still be resigned. looking at how long NATO is reacting and what discussions are going on, for me this issue is debatable.
@@censord6960 I'd say smaller and weaker on paper. Ukraine is a massive country so of course they'll also hav a much stronger and larger army relatively to defend such a large area. Add that to the fact that Ukraine was caught off guard and struggled to quickly mobilize and get their forces in position they've done decently enough holding off the Russians. The Baltic countries should be able to dig in and hold the Russians off since they'll be on higher alert and have more time to dig in. The smaller size of the country should make it easier to concentrate their defense and bottleneck a Russian offensive. Given the fact that they're actually in NATO means they probably had NATO training and definitely have advanced weapons.
@@1ProAssassin Well, the question here is not that the Baltic countries are weak, but how NATO will react.
And in general, it is worth considering that the Russian army is really very powerful and colossal. Their tactic is to literally overwhelm with numbers. Unfortunately, it will be very difficult for the little countries to resist Russia. The Finns and Ukrainians can fight back only because they have a field for maneuver and they hit the weak points of the Russian army (logistics) in mobile groups. They attack and immediately redeploy. Against Russia, you need to have room for maneuver, otherwise this colossus will simply crush you.
I would like to point out that the USA has been using Violent Force as a "Diplomatic" strategy/tool for decades.
Most major nations do, I don't get your point
Whataboutism isn’t a real argument retard
Who cares about the US here, its Russia invading Ukraine, not the US invading
@@elirej7201 the point is the West need to shut up and stop pretending to be morally high, they committed much more war crimes than Russia even in recent 25 years
@@RandomAmerican304only for american
Bro never heard of invasion of Grenada, Vietnam, Cuba Bay of pigs, yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan.
France was already kicked out from Africa
Finally
Clearly not
Not exactly true.
French corporations continue to exploit ex-colonies by taking their resources.
This is what is referred to as neo-colonialism
So France very much still has a presence and interest in Africa
France's central bank still operates there.
@@Interestinguiniyyah the real neo-colonial power in Africa is now China. And France is doing Africa a favor by letting half the continent's people into France.
The next victim would be Moldova immediately
Agreed...💯
You wrong ,,because America's media Web,, lies,,,,how many countries are invaded by USA,,,,a Rusia is just good for blame and cover up of America's appetite,,to rule the world 🌎,
Don't agree
Trow a country dice, it'll be the next one
Most Moldovans want to rejoin in a union with Russia .
We must remain in fear and under Western hegemony: “If Ukraine falls, it will be a catastrophe for the West; it will be the end of Western hegemony” Boris Johnson.
Yes, it will be a catastrophe for the west. But how is it a bad thing?
Violent force is the source of power already. Wake up 😂😂
Since the Dawn of Time....💯
Violence is the quintessence of power I would say, always have been.
This is by far the most simpleton breakdown I’ve ever seen.
The Channel Is probably american
But violence has always been acceptable ways of carrying out foreign policy for the west. Remember Syria, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Pakistan, Vietnam... It's only surprising when other countries use violence to achieve their goals
Honestly you remain ignorant on how the actual populace reacted to these. Vietnam was famously controversial due to it being the first time you could watch war live. And it's quite famous over here in the U.S how stupid we were.
@@simpleviewer1334 unfortunately, Vietnam didn't prevent Iraq and Afghanistan, both countries that did absolutely nothing to the US. Osama lived in Pakistan, not Afghanistan. You destroyed the wrong -stan.
@@simpleviewer1334it’s only stupid according to perspective the people who wanted it to happen were well pleased
USA is an empire and empires must expand influence or they die. Unlike Russia USA would be strangled if sanctioned half the world because multinational Plutarchs have shut down our industrial might and ability to self sustain
And British colonial empire....
@@fabianabongo6284why did this happen?
Bro don't know about NATO 💀
What nato will do? Sanction me? 😂😂😂
@@FodaseNaoLigodont make me laugh, baltics and Poland are from nato, if they are attacked it will trigger the article 5, which means all nato members get involved, which will eventually lead to a world war or worse, a nuclear war and fallout and famine across the globe. Now it isn't a political problem, but a humanitarian. No one wins.
@@FodaseNaoLigono it will come to Moscow🇺🇸🇵🇱🇱🇹🇬🇧🇩🇪🇮🇹🇫🇷
And natos dad america
@@loafofbreado2162 I think bro forget about nukes lol
Reemergence of "violent force to solve international relations". Russia is not the only country doing this, USA and Other countries have done the same for 50 years
Someone really thinks its Russia vs Ukraine.
But all smart people know it's Russia vs NATO
By Ukrainians arms with “big” support and love from NATO ☺️. That is how Ukraine executing their mission for Western white men and colour gays 😂
In this case the Nato would send more money and weapons.
What about North Korea, China, Iran?
More like Ukraine supplied by west VS Russia supplied by China and North Korea. Such smart you is 🤪
@@vanmiddletonphotography tell me what help did we get? Bro im from Russia, I read everyday about special war operation. Even president of China said that he is neutral but If USA will send ukraine military they will help. NORTH KOREA AND IRAN? BRO HOOOW DID THEY HELP? 😔that's sad that all western want to do all of you versus Russia
With how things are going is not turning into a "if Ukraine loses" it's turning into a "when Ukraine loses".
What does Russia gain when it wins?
Already lost..
You meant to say when NATO losses....
Stupid take, no one winning, both countries basically destroyed. Russia might be bigger but it's much more vulnerable because it's consists of many different people and borders a lot of other countries. It's big but fragile.
@@soltysssRussia is destroyed? Wow, didn’t know (live here😂)
To think that Russia wont win is deluded
RUSSIA IS ACTING IN SELF DEFENCE.
and KICKING ASS .😂
Russia's presence in Ukraine = source of instability.
American presence in Ukraine = source of stability.
What a logical argument 😂😂
Compared to The presence of Russia in any Country, The presence of The us actually is a Source of Stability
@@lustip8194wym stability look at Afghanistan and Syria
@@WTmobileArie the us Tried but they were Not ready for democracy
99,9 % Support The Sharia ( study from 2013)
@@WTmobileArie the us tried to establish democracy there for 20 years.. they are not ready
99.99 approve the sharia in afghanistan (study from 2013)
@@lustip8194 exactly, Why did America even try to establish democracy there, knowing that the population would resist, and if they didn’t know the population would resist, why did they continue to try by force when they had already started? This isn't source of stability
"Violente force could reemerge as means of carrying out international relation", in the meantime US invaded Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, NATO bombed Serbia and break away Kosovo, bombed Lybia and killed its leader, threatened and attacked Nord Stream 1,stopped the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, refused to discuss Russia security guarantees. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. You meant "Violente force could reemerge as means to oppose US hegemony"
Well the US does everything for the better. All these counties you are talking about are authoritarian countries that the west wants to overthrow and liberate. Liberation is a good thing
So NATOz presence closer to Russia isn't a problem but Russias prese ce closer to NATO, if you can hear yourself, who has moved closer to the other of the 2?.
NATO is a defensive organisation countries are free to join Russia is a country the only way for it to grow is to conquer I guess your comment just justifies why Russia neighbour want to join NATO yes they don't want Russia to expand into their countries! Are u mad that they want to defend themselves?
Фінляндія яка до 22 року навіть не думала вступати в НАТО але геніальний стратег Пупкін все передбачив 😂😂😂 але ж це інше ) там кордон не менше ніж в Україні з оркостаном 😂
Funny how nato "moving" involves countries independently applying to join, whereas Russia "moving" involves illegally invading.
I wonder why countries bordering russia are applying to join nato?
It's like breaking into a neighbour's house to stop them joining the neighbourhood watch, then blaming the neighbourhood watch "expansion"
What is the belief that Russia will invade beyond Ukraine based on? What economic and military means do they have to make this a reality?
Тоді навіщо росія вторглася в Україну ? Вони хочуть відновити СССР от вам відповідь, це мрія Блядіміра Пупкіна
Nah Poland 'bouta have some flashbacks with this one 💀
Yep. Finland too. Russia shouldn't FAFO.
This aint happening bro
The instability source is USA not Russia
This is like me saying i caused a flooding in India because i forgot to close the tap water for 2 minutes.
People forget that Ukraine is a Russian state
As an African I don't want western influence, may Russia win❤
You don't want that, believe me
@@danilastepanovmyes everybody wants that
nobody wants negative iq influence look what you did to ur country filled it with illegal migrants that have more rights than its citizens 😂😂
What russia winning ?
You do realize the Soviet Union is dissolved, right? The only part of Russia that still resembles it is the corrupt officials and the mistreatment of its people.
Well it seems to me Chinese influence is what Africans need to start worrying about... But ultimately yall should be free!
Russia could not fight its way out of a wet paperbag
Говорит тот, кто является колонией США. ❤
@@Nakanaricz
Lmao, you didn’t deny it though. Their piss poor performance is certainly a result of at least 30 years of corruption and negligence.
You keep telling yourself that.
@@Alex462047 i dont have to look at the tree day war in Ukraine 😂
@@ulrichkristensen4087 The ostrich method. Well done!
“Bro learned history from the mc Donald’s toilet” 🤓👆
Napoleon, Hitler try to defeat Russia and die. Author seems to be the same.
but this time uk will not save Russia🗿
@@glitchchungus8318 UK? UK also can do nothing. They are not power. Truth is power, Russia is power.
@@VovaSidorOffTruth and Russia? So, two opposites?
@@navarog378 you are poisoned by propoganda
@@navarog378 Truth will win, I promise you.
"Violent force could reemerge as a means to carry out international relations". It has always been the case. You were just lucky to live away from the hotspots
Spot on
If anyone has not yet understood the reasons for the start of the conflict, open the OSCE website and read the reports starting from February 10, 2022, but not the title page of the report, but the full version with a map!
'may go on to invade Baltic countries'
Source: Boy's bathroom
I like how successful that new Ukraine counteroffensive goes.
Is there another outcome than Russian victory ?
they are winning btw
Ukraine is killing orcs 1500-2200 every day they have thousands videos killing orcs captured while you have 0 proof
Not
@@NoMouthNoScream this aged so well😅
Kursk moment.
Yeah then why is russia using the Istanbul agreement as a basis for peace. This is not a war of territory or Russian expansion.
Oh yeah, the peace treaty which would have Russia expand. Clearly this war is not Russian aggresion! Jokes aside, remind me. Who invaded who?
Lol rename the video as "what will we do when Russia defeats Ukraine"
You're living in 1945
Be real ,Remove the “if”
‘What Russia beats Ukraine?’
Nato, don't provoce Russia, or you will lose yourself and territory😂😂😂
sureee the “2nd strongest military” has been in a stalemate with a Eastern European country for almost a year
@@ChristianMapperReal
If you call obliterating 80% of the army, destroying 50% of its economy while growing its own, annexing all the territories it wanted and entirely meeting their objectives a stalemate, so be it.
@@ChristianMapperReal
Russia with their own weapons, not very technologized and old vs a NATO-supplied country with the newest weapons and military technologies
Think again… the ukrainians are struggling *AF* with all of their new weapons.. and nato- trained volunteers
@@ChristianMapperReal Russia is not fighting an Eastern European country, but with almost all the weapons and satellite intelligence of the NATO bloc.
@@ExceedtherealmAccording to Russia about 500% of Ukrainian armored vehicles have been destroyed, counting those supported by the west as an aid in the defensive war, so I don't know what the Russian army is fighting right now.
Or they keep Crimea and their black sea port access and that is the end of it.
Zelensky making wrong decisions and making others pay for it. This is what happens when ego becomes bigger than your people's well being and you start going into war with more powerful countries instead of de escalating the situation.
@Shono123i also have friends there and they want to be part of russia
@Aalijah_Matyevna be my girlfriend
Why are people hating? This analysis ain’t far from wrong if Russia were to win.
Said the frog who doesn't know shit!
Russia may have nukes, but the US, UK and France also have nukes. It's a conclusion we must never reach.
China has Nukes
India has Nukes
North Korea has Nukes
You mean when Russian defeats Ukraine.
If russia defeats ukraine, ukraine will win on the internet.
Not sure why Russia would want the Baltic States or Poland, it isn't like they would need land. This "some say" is just crap.
Зачем тогда РФ присоединила часть территории Украины, и даже внесли это в конституцию РФ?
@@КатеринаР-м7к Это наказание за то, что Украина отказалась от переговоров.
@@КатеринаР-м7ккрым, потому что там был флот, всю остальную территорию, только для того, что бы был наземный способ к нему попасть. Вся остальная Украина уже поделена между америкосами и европейцами и нахер не нужна. Спросите, захера украинцы с Александром Соросом договорились 400 квадратных км под химические отходы западных компаний отдать? И почему французов это волнует больше, чем жителей Украины?
Или у вас в рукаве туз, в виде Китайцев, которым арендовали землю на 50 лет под выращивание помидоров в России. Пример крайне нерелевантный, кстати говоря.
@@КатеринаР-м7кв качестве демонстрации что надо было соглашаться на переговоры и в качестве сухопутного коридора в крым
но если ты мыслишь только шаблоном зачем и как посмели?
то ты не поймешь
Bro, just go and live in Siberia if you want ‘land’
The iron curtain was dismantled on the Russian side, the Warshaw pact was dissolved and Russia allowed Germany to reunite. It was NATO that refused to dissolve and decided to expand. NATO created the instability. The new iron curtain is a NATO curtain.
Hmmm... have you ever wondered WHY those countries joined nato🤔
@@Kyle_Broflowski1997well they shouldn’t have set a self fulfilling prophecy by striving into nato. Russia released them and trusted them but that only works both ways. If all tvose ex soviet countries dont trust russia there is no reason for russia to trust them
@@fk4410 russia basically colonised those countries and held them against their will, and when their empire collapsed they broke free, and obviously, seeked protection from the countries that, you know, *weren't occupying them for the last 50 years* . Russia just cant handle the fact that their former colonies dont want to be under their boot anymore
@@fk4410What trust are speaking about ? When your neighbour is a militaristic dictatorship, how can you trust him, especially when he has such a background !?
@@lucatthedoor5391 you can trust a dictator more than some democracys where politicans are exchanged every few years
"Violent force could re-emerge" - dude has been living under a rock
People were seriously expecting ukraine to beat Russia ? 😂
Де саме ми програємо? Кордони майже не зрушили з місця 14 року а втрати росії вже 30% від усіх її загальних запасів , неймовірний стратег 😂
@@hakuto6814 Imagine being so deluded that you think that Russians occupying a big chunk of your land but making very slow progress is a victory for you 😂
@@iamhefulKursk moment.
@@thejp361 It wont last
Only the most stupid i.e. the majority.
lmao it wont capture Ukraine, and MUCH LESS Poland LOL!
If? You mean when.
Russia isn’t getting a desicive victory
bro forgot about NATO💀
Violence forces? U mean u.s and nato right?
The violence started by east Ukraine against East Ukraine in 2014, with the support of the US.
This is well documented, including in the western press.
Remember, some of us can remember more than a couple of weeks back in time...
The war is now in its 10th year.
Everyone knows the war in the Donbass started in 2014 but your memory can't be that good if you think that's how it started. Violence in East Ukraine started when Russian separatists stormed Ukrainian government buildings in Luhansk and Donetsk in early April and threatened an insurgency. The Ukrainian government then sent in forces to combat those who had forcibly and illegally taken control of public office. The US had no involvement in that. That's when the violence started in eastern Ukraine.
In the year before the 2022 invasion of Ukraine by Russia, there were 25 deaths (half from unexplored mines). The violence was diminishing with every passing year and was localised at this point in the war.
Then we got to February 2022. Since then at least 3 times as many civilians have died than the 8 previous years. All Ukrainian. 8 times as many soldiers killed on both sides in one year compared to 8 previous years. So when people say the war started then, it's because the level of violence and life lost compared to previous years is many, many times higher.
THANK YOU! 👏👏👏👏
I think, today, the war in Ukraine has reached the point where the West and the rest of the free world can not, should not, will not allow Ukraine to fail.
Well they still f*cked up.
I love when people say "free world." You mean the fading former colonial powers who don't' really give a rat's ass about freedom, other than their freedom to continue to impose their will upon everyone else.
But they are still spectators.
They will; don't worry. Nobody cares about Ukraine. Not even US.😅
Ukraine will become a landlocked country, and this in itself will bring an end to the United terrorist states of americas murdering and thieving around the world, and not before time.
Ukraine lost before the first shot was fired.
Even with nato support of weapons and trained volunteers can’t do nothing…
Putin expected to win in days. You shouldn’t count those chickens just yet.
😂😂😂
@@CM-ve1bzretarded 🤡
NATO: Am I a joke to you?
Yes, and no.
Good thing Ukraine will win
Russian victory will be you want it or not .
And the price is what? A split country with destroyed cities and regions uninhabitable for decades
@@poppi510 in ukraine is if not the biggest 1 of the
biggest in the world agricaltural land for bread weed production
in zaparozetsk is the biggest nuclear electric station in europe to product electricity
i am saying only 2 things and they are much more.
and ALL THOSE were created from russians in the 70 years of USSR time
and you believe Russians are going to give ALL THOSE to west becose of zele??
we see
ukraine as country was NEVER EXISTED stalin made ukraine as soviet republic for more then 1000 years was Russia and it is
ukrainian language it does not existe is russian language with polish idioms and they speak ( they know ) only 20% in west ukraine more then the half total population of ukraine are russians JUST EXACTLY how they are in the rest of Russia
they still ONLY 2 choices for the west
1 THEY FORGET ( ukraine )
2 third world thermonuclear war and the end of humanity.
NO OTHER CHOICE
the dilemma is their's
perhaps in your dreams 😂
putin said himself he is well aware that usa has much higher spending in military than russia. if usa really wants to win this war, they could.
usa is crap they LOST from vietnam HEHEHEHEHE
😀😃😀😃😀😃😀😃😀😃😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😃😃😃🤣
@@vegpvegsn6934 since then until this day many many billions of dollars have been spent in military. There is no comparison. We have 2024 if you didnt know yet, wake up!
😂😂😂😂. US was doing this until Russia interfered😅😅😅😅😅
Russian team✊
👇
Nato in Russian borders: "acceptable and reasonable", Russia 1 meter from its mainland: "PROVICATIVE!!!😡🤬🤡🤡"
Finland and Switzerland?)😂😂😂
Burger King analysis
"Given the Rus military perfomance in ukraine"? 😂 Russia has been slaughtering an army of total 800tsnd to 1million soldiers with weapons from over 30 nations. That means that ukr has been natos biggest army and they are about to go down.
Russia sent the troll farm commenters here?
понятно же, что Украина бессильна и проигрывает на войне. Слава России и русским солдатам ☦️🇷🇺
So why hasn’t Russia advanced?
@@SeanP7195это война на истощение, а не на убийство.
@@Memesoon584 no translation
@@SeanP7195 This is a war of attrition, not murder
@@Memesoon584 I don’t follow. If Russia is winning, they would be advancing.
I love Russia for it's support in mediating between Pakistan and Iran in the recent spat. Thank You Russia
Not "what if" but " when"?😂😂😂
Kharkiv?)
RUSSIA JUST WON !!! 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
@Ukraine433 yes! they told it to us for real!
rasha parasha JUST LOSSEEEE👎👎👎👎👎
@@user_uncVladef4 im not saying it because i stand with Russia, i swear. But Russia really won the war, and i heard about this.
@@theiotahimselfidkwhylie detected.
I love Russia 🇷🇺💪🇷🇺
Why?
😂 ok ..
what was the Iraq war then Libya and Syria ?
After Hitler we have Putin now. One man who opened all hell gates open
Putler is nothin, a trash compared to real leaders.
Let's not poke the nuclear bear.
What if.
Seriously real question is WHEN
Long term tactics of Russia, means long term damage of Ukraine?
😢
Just to remind u, Russia controlled territories from Ukraine to East Germany and there was no divide that is said here.
I don't see peace anytime soon especially if russia takes over ukraine
This video is made for kids i suppose
Its not "what if", its just when. 😂😂😂
How is this any different from now?
They did
With this logic let's ask "what if Russia invades Canada and Mexico?"
Это в планах москвы
Ridiculous, I live in Eastern Europe and never see so stupid theory 😂 hollywood yes
gotta love how things change. now russia couldnt even defend itself
Propaganda video... everyone knows it... Read the comments.
Да нахуй нам не нужна балтия, а польша тем более, с чего они вообще это взяли?
All the russian bots
usa, nato, israel - fascist occupation forces
North Africa? What the hell is north africa doing here? 😂
The 2 countryball kids in my school during a break making wars on paper ripped out straight from their notebook
Always makes me laugh when main stream media accuse Russia of using propaganda and then go on to use the argument “Russia might keep going and take over all of Europe”. Nice piece of propaganda right there.
Як мінімум Блядімір Пупкін щороку сам особисто говорить , що його мрія це відновити СССР а хто перший в черзі? Правильно, Україна а лише потім усі інші.
Violence MIGHT REEMERGE as a tool for foreign policy? Where have you been!?
Every war come from america.
Каждая война идет из москвы
They should have invited russia into nato. China would be checkmate.
Instead is it was very important to only have super political correct countries like turkey hungary poland israel saudi arabia as allies lol
Russia in NATO is pointless. China is irrelevant to NATO.